Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5790_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
36 Мб
Скачать
10.3 Pathology of the Kidney
a
bc
de
Fig. 10.30 Urinary tract trauma. ( a ) Blood sedimentation in urinary bladder after renal trauma.
( b ) Perirenal clear fl uid – consistent with posttraumatic urinoma. ( c , d ) Focal altered contour and structure of kidney ( c ) after trauma – only aCDS ( d ) clearly demarks extent of renal injury. ( e ) Relatively normal appearance of kidney, but no perfusion on aCDS (colour box) – indicating devascularisation due to hilar injury of the kidney
357

10.3.9 Renal Tumours

10.3.9.1 Benign Tumours
Mostly hamartoma, angioma, angiomyolipoma (tuberous sclerosis) and rarely adenoma.
10.3.9.2 Pre- or Semimalignant Tumours
Nephroblastomatosis (remnants of metanephrogenic tissue, may develop into Wilms’ tumour), neonatal mesoblastic nephroma (mostly benign, rare malignant entities).
10.3.9.3 Malignant Tumours
Most commonly Wilms’ tumour (nephroblastoma), rhabdoid tumour, renal sar­coma, renal cell carcinoma – other entities rare. US Findings (Fig.
10.31 ):
• Angiomyolipoma exhibits more or less typical echogenic tissue structure.
• Cystic nephroma appears as multicystic mass that may manifest segmentally with tumourous enlargement, disruption of normal echogenicity, small septae, usually with little perfusion. Larger solid areas, nodular wall structure, hyperae­mia or large cystic components with haemorrhage may indicate another underly­ing entity (e.g. cystic Wilms’ tumour).
358
a
bc
10 Ultrasound of the Urogenital Tract
d
g
ef
h
ijk
Fig. 10.31 Renal tumours. ( a ) Focal echogenic renal tumour, typical for an angiomyolipoma. ( b , c )
Focal renal tumour of similar echogenicity as renal cortex on gray scale ( b ), better visible by its exophytic behaviour and its (hyper)vascularity on CDS ( c ), in a patient with tuberous sclerosis – consistent with an atypical angiomyolipoma – needs follow-up and sectional imaging. ( d ) Nephroblastomatosis: multiple peripheral renal tumourous nodules, partially diffi cult to appreciate on gray scale, better outlined by aCDS. ( e ) Typical appearance of Wilms tumour: large mass with relatively homogenous tissue and cortex-like echogenicity. ( f , g ) More and less cystic Wilms tumours. ( h ) 3DUS in an echogenic Wilms tumour, helpful for more accurate tumour volume calculation; the right lower box shows a 2DUS image of same patient with an additional exophytic nephroblastomatotic focus in upper pole ( system caused by impaired drainage due to compression of renal pelvis by the large tumour. ( i ) Focal renal
+…+) in a child with lymphatic leukaemia – consistent with renal involvement. ( j ) (Congenital)
lesion (
1
Renal tumour in a neonate with subtotal destruction of kidney, only leaving a subtle peripheral rim of origi­nal kidney parenchyma – consistent with a mesoblastic nephroma. ( k ) Atypical tumour ( girl. Most common DDx: rhabdoid Wilms tumour, renal sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma
+…+). Note dilatation of collecting
1
+…+) in an older
1

10.4 Renal Biopsy and Interventions

359
• Other tumours have nonspecifi c appearance of any mass lesion – may exhibit pseudocapsule, growth from kidney, displacing surrounding structures, local lymph node metastases and – particularly in Wilms’ tumour – relatively often have vascular invasion with renal vein thrombosis reaching even into IVC and up to right atrium (may also occur in renal cell carcinoma). Secondary necrotic, cystic, haemorrhagic changes may be present.
• Assumption of entity depends more on age than on US/imaging fi ndings.
• Tumours usually large when diagnosed (different for angiomyolipoma/hamartoma).
DDx Focal nephroma/infl ammatory pseudotumour, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephri­tis, infi ltration in systemic disease (lymphoma), hypertrophic column of Bertin, other complex cysts. Role of US Initial diagnosis – fi nd/confi rm suspected lesion, defi ne size (volume calculation)/ relation to central renal structures, surrounding organs/tissue, assess patency of cen­tral structures (artery, vein, pelvis), give fi rst information on stage (infi ltrating/local/ liver metastases?).
Later-follow-up, assessment of complications.
Additional Investigation
• Sectional imaging by MR (or CT, if MR unavailable) mandatory, particularly in suspected malignancy – adhere to local tumour imaging protocols.
• Sometimes US-guided biopsy (varies with country/continent).
10.4 Renal Biopsy and Interventions
Also see Chap. 2 for general recommendations/guidelines.

10.4.1 Renal Biopsy

Biopsy often necessary for histologic assessment of renal parenchymal disease – biopsy of focal renal lesions far less common than in adults, particularly in Europe. Renal biopsy should always be performed under US guidance for reducing risks:
• Standardised procedure with pre-interventional assessment, time out, peri­interventional guidance, postinterventional follow-up.
• Standardised protocols should be used.
• Pre-interventional US performed to assess kidney for potential dilatation, thick­ness of renal parenchyma, potential biopsy risks (e.g. abnormal vessels or pre­existing arteriovenous malformations/fi stula) and impaired access. At that time needle length/size defi ned – depending on depth of kidney, size of sample required, thickness of parenchyma.
• Most commonly 20–18(−16) Gauge needles with 1.2(−2) cm core length advis­able, potentially using coaxial technique.
• Use of steering device (biopsy guide) and (semi-)automated biopsy guns helpful.
• Thereafter validation of indication and coagulation check, informed consent, time out.
360
ab
10 Ultrasound of the Urogenital Tract
c
de
Fig. 10.32 Renal biopsy. ( a ) Renal biopsy, dorsal approach to lower pole of left kidney: needle path
outlined by dotted lines , needle (echogenic line) already advanced to renal capsule. ( b ) Needle now fi red, position and depth of needle nicely visualised by image from cine-loop documentation. ( c ) aCDS superiorly helps to depict postinterventional subcapsular haematoma which in early stages is of similar echogenicity as renal cortex; also observe triangular perfusion defect in lower pole, indi­cating regional perfusion defect due to injury of respective vessel causing a small infarction. ( d , e ) Postinterventional follow-up (3 h after procedure) depicts focal aliasing on CDS, consistent with an arteriovenous fi stula; respective fl ow alterations of feeding artery and draining vein assessed by spectral analysis (e) confi rming shunt fl ow by demonstrating arterialised fl ow pattern in draining vein
US - guided biopsy (see also Chap. 2, and Figs. 2.12 and 2.13 ): performed in prone position (for native kidneys) – with support under belly to avoid displace­ment of lower pole of left kidney (usually targeted to avoid injury of adjacent liver on right side).
– Local and systemic analgesia/sedation may be necessary with adequate
monitoring.
– Biopsy direction – parallel to major segmental vessels branching into periph-
ery; CDS helpful to avoid large vessels.
– Real-time monitoring of needle positioning and biopsy using cine loop
advisable.
• Post-biopsy US: check for potential post-biopsy complications (e.g. bleeding, haematoma, haematuria, infarction and AV fi stula), recommended immediately afterwards, 3–6 h and 24 h after intervention. Standardised post-biopsy manage­ment helpful (Fig.
10.32 ).
• See also ESPR/ESUR recommendations in Pediatr Radiol (2014 -in press).

10.4.2 Drainage/Nephrostomy

US enables safe access to dilated system or abscess. Steering devices attached to transducer sometimes helpful; alternatively freehand technique used. Always defi ne
10.4 Renal Biopsy and Interventions
361
adequate access that allows for suffi cient parenchymal coverage of targeted area to avoid leakage/urinoma formation.
Access achieved commonly using trocar or Seldinger technique; additional sup-
plementing fl uoroscopy may be helpful to assess leakage, positioning and anatomy after contrast instillation once successful access is gained under US guidance or for Seldinger technique using guide wires and dilatation of parenchymal tract (see Chap. 2 , and Figs. 2.14 and 1.13 ).

10.4.3 Postoperative Imaging

To assess postoperative anatomy, to detect complications and to evaluate success.
For assessment of VUR recurrence or insuffi cient success of cystoscopic tech-
niques, ce-VUS can be performed as alternative to VCUG even intraoperatively.
10.4.3.1 After VUR Treatment
Cystoscopic Treatment
Injection of material at ostium under cystoscopic guidance
US can assure patency of ostium by proving ureteric infl ow jet, may depict
impaired drainage (too large deposits), causing ureteral/pelvi-caliceal distension, potentially associated with stenotic peristalsis of ureter.
Deposits usually seen as echogenic focus in vicinity to transmural distal ureter
– may cause twinkling (Fig. 10.32 ). NOTE : Some transient dilatation of ureter normal, may disappear spontaneously; only if additional new dilatation of pelvi-caliceal system noted, obstruction needs to be considered – then may need further functional assessment/potentially guided drainage/stenting.
Antireflux Surgery
Different surgical techniques used, ostium appearance varies depending on per­formed surgery:
• Commonly altered course/potentially altered insertion of ureter visualised.
• Ureter infl ow jet more diffi cult to depict.
• Initially ureteric wall thickened/swollen, some ureteral dilatation.
• Only in signifi cant obstruction higher degree of dilatation of collecting system observed – some transient mild dilatation often seen in early postoperative phase, par­ticularly if drains acting as foreign body placed causing reduced ureteral peristalsis.
NOTE : With full bladder there may be kinking of ureter at insertion causing (tran- sient? intermittent?) obstruction. Other complications:
• Rarely perivesical haematoma/urinoma – will usually resolve spontaneously provided suffi cient bladder drainage.
• Rarely intervesical clots, commonly catheters (often placed for fi rst days).
NOTE : Search for bladder wall injury with urinoma formation, try to localise potential drains.
Findings in reimplantation for megaureter similar as with antirefl ux surgery
– preexisting dilatation of ureter and wall thickening persist, even in good result with good function.
362
a
bc
10 Ultrasound of the Urogenital Tract
de
Fig. 10.33 Postoperative US. ( a ) Swollen ostium after reimplantation of a megaureter; patency docu-
mented by CDS exhibiting ureteric infl ow jet. ( b ) Echogenic deposit at ostium after cystoscopic treat- ment of VUR (defl ux instillation). ( c ) JJ catheter in physiologically stilldilated renal pelvis after pyeloplasty. ( d ) Dilated renal collecting system after surgery, with sedimented echoes in calyx, consis- tent with postoperative intraluminal blood. ( e ) Perivesical fl uid accumulation after accidental injury to bladder wall in cystoscopic unroofi ng of a huge ureterocele, consistent with a perivesical urinoma
10.4.3.2 Findings After Pyeloplasty
Early assessment should focus on depiction of perfusion defi cits – persisting dilata­tion normal, does not indicate persisting obstruction:
• Assess position of drain/tip of JJ stent, potentially urinoma/haematoma and postop­erative infarctions. Furthermore haematoma/echoes in collecting system (Fig. 10.33 ).
• Asymmetrically elevated RI/slightly impaired renal perfusion physiologic in early postoperative setting. Sometimes sectional infarction (vascular damage).
• Perfusion should normalise unless persisting obstruction/chronic damage/scar­ring is present.
• In early state dilatation often less due to stents or drains – when withdrawn, some (particularly intrarenal) dilatation persists, degree of extrarenal dilatation depends on amount of resected pelvis, does not correlate with potentially persisting obstruction. Only gradually dilated system will eventually become narrower over time, renal pelvis usually is immediately smaller due to partial resection perioperatively – does not indicate absence of obstruction.
• Physiologically some transient increased echogenicity with reduced cortico­medullary differentiation (reactive swelling).
• Eventually renal parenchyma normalises – except for those with scarring/persis­tent damage.
• Renal (parenchymal) growth best monitored using volume calculations – also try to assess pelvi-ureteric junction, ureteric infl ow jet into bladder, potentially addi­tional vessels and scarring.
• Additional imaging: MAG3 scintigraphy and/or MR urography, rarely focused IVU.

10.5 Re na l Transplant

NOTE : US poor in assessing/grading drainage – achieved by scintigraphy/MR urography; some centres perform pressure tests before withdrawal of postoperative catheter from collecting system under fl uoroscopic surveillance (pressure point for contrast drainage into ureter should be <10 cm H 2 O).
363
10.4.3.3 After Various Interventions
A variety of interventional procedures exist – balloon dilatation, percutaneous drainage/stenting, endoscopic unroofi ng of ureteroceles, etc. After Biopsy , Drainage , etc. – See above. US Findings after other interventions : Depend on performed procedure. Used to evaluate/document dilatation of collect­ing system, potential echoes/structures within system, position of drainages and stents, assessment of haemorrhage or urinoma and renal perfusion. After Extracorporeal Lithotripsy ( ESWL )
• Assess residual concretions, amount of disintegration and potential persisting obstruction (particularly at site of ureteropelvic/uretero-vesical junction) by residual deposits.
• Tissue damage by shock wave (oedema, haematoma/diffuse swelling/rupture – either of surrounding tissue and/or kidney).
• Some transient perfusion impairment (reduced peripheral vasculature on aCDS, elevated RI due to low diastolic fl ow) – commonly resolves spontaneously.
10.5 Renal Transplant
US used for pre-, peri-, post-transplant assessment (see also ESPR/ESUR recom­mendations in Pediatr Radiol 2014, in press):
• Pre-transplant assessment of donor: assess potential preexisting conditions; insure that living donor left with suffi ciently functional kidney.
• Recipient evaluation: preexisting renal disease, bladder (capacity/function), major vessels for planning anastomosis (diameter, patency, course of arteries and veins).
• During transplantation: CDS to assess perfusion of freshly implanted kidney (to depict early potential compromise of vascular anastomosis allowing for immediate repair).
• After transplantation: repeated follow-up to assess for proper function/potential complications.

10.5.1 Normal US Findings in Renal Transplant

Commonly large, in right/left iliac fossa, size/shape depend on donor organ. Cortico­medullary differentiation often pronounced. CDS exhibits normal vascular architecture – some transient aliasing at anastomosis during early postoperative period; use aCDS to demonstrate peripheral normal (perfused) vasculature. Segmental perfusion defects may correspond to site of biopsy/infarctions (e.g. sacrifi ced accessory/polar arteries). Spectral trace of arterial and venous fl ow profi les as in normal healthy kidneys (Fig. 10.34 ).
364
a
bc
10 Ultrasound of the Urogenital Tract
def
Fig. 10.34 Renal transplant/PTLD. ( a ) Typical appearance of the parenchyma of a renal trans-
plant, with prominent cortico-medullary differentiation; pelvis visible, also some fl uid at upper pole. ( b ) aCDS demonstrates normal peripheral vascularity; reduced colour coding of medullae is physiological. ( c ) CDS with spectral trace shows altered and reduced arterial peripheral fl ow and markedly turbulent and accelerated venous fl ow due to severe renal swelling– a sensitive, but non­specifi c sign (in this case rejection). ( d ) Perirenal fl uid collection – DDx: postoperative urinoma, liquefi ed haematoma, lymphatic fl uid collection. ( e ) Focal complex hypoechoic liquid lesion adja- cent to vascular anastomosis with preserved fl ow in vessels – seromatous transformation of a perivascular postoperative haematoma (DDx: thrombosed aneurysm). ( e ) Focal hypoechoic nodule in transplanted kidney; the child also had similar nodules in original kidney as well as a group of enlarged mesenteric nodes, consistent with PTLD
NOTE : RI changes nonspecifi c – depend on number of partially systemic/extrare- nal factors. Persisting singularly renal fi ndings such as elevated RI (> 80), increased/ fast venous fl ow, pathologic fl ow pattern (e.g. delayed systolic upstroke, aliasing/ turbulence), etc. Indicate transplant problems, as well as signifi cantly decreased (peripheral) perfusion, particularly on aCDS (e.g. peripheral halo/rim sign).

10.5.2 Pathologic US Findings

Early Post - transplant Findings (Fig. 10.34 ):
• Perirenal haematoma, cyst formation – may represent lymphocele, urinoma.
• More or less dilatation of collecting system with potentially swelling/thickening of urothelium.
• Peripheral zones of contusion or infarction (e.g. site of initial biopsy).
• Malposition of drain/catheter – fi ndings comparable to respective US appearance in native kidney.
• aCDS: assess focal turbulent fl ow, peripheral minor perfusion, segmental perfu­sion defects – guide spectral analysis.
• Spectral analysis: impaired diastolic fl ow, impaired systolic infl ow, missing/ turbulent venous fl ow – signs for vascular complications.

10.6 Adrenal Glands and Pararenal Space

NOTE : US poor in differentiating between various causes of acute transplant failure (e.g. acute tubular necrosis, acute ischaemia, renal vein thrombosis, acute rejection).
• DDx narrowed by clinical signs with detailed history of surgery, US features – eventually may need US-guided biopsy.
Late Post - transplant Findings Entities : Lymphocele, infection, cyclosporine toxicity, vasculopathy/stenosis/aneu­rysm, rejection, urinary obstruction. Most fi ndings refl ect respective sonomorpho­logic features in native kidney. Rejection : Most sensitive sign – acute enlargement of transplant organ, RI not specifi c (tend to be elevated). In suspected rejection only renal biopsy will eventually establish or exclude the diagnosis:
• Some centres perform protocol driven biopsies; others only perform biopsy on clinical indication.
NOTE : Helpful to have baseline US in stable uneventful post-transplant period to allow for comparison during phases with transplant complications. Always include assessment of potentially remaining native kidneys (e.g. cystic disease, tumour) + major abdominal structures (e.g. post-transplant lymphoproliferative dis­ease – PTLD, Fig. 10.34 ) on follow-up US. Role of US
• Major imaging tool for assessment and follow-up, also at bedside.
• May help decisions on additional imaging.
Additional Investigations
• VCUG/ce-VUS, scintigraphy, MR urography/angiography.
• Rarely CT, interventional radiology for potential percutaneous treatment.
365
10.6 Adrenal Glands and Pararenal Space

10.6.1 General Remarks

Prominent in fi rst months of life (length 10–12 mm), will then shrink to approxi­mately 50 %.
Thereafter constant growth over years – eventually ends in puberty with normal
size (length ~ 2 cm). Medulla prominent in neonate; cortex later becomes prominent.

10.6.2 Typical Normal US Finding

V- or Y-shape structure situated on upper pole of kidney (Fig. 10.35 ):
• Shape variable, particularly in ectopic position of kidney.
• Centrally echoic, less echoic peripheral cortex, surrounded by more or less echo­genic perirenal fat.
NOTE : In neonates adrenal gland easy to visualise; the older and more obese a patient, the more diffi cult to assess by US. Volume : Various methods with partially complicated calculations reported. Rough estimate of size achieved by maximal sagittal length.
366
ab c
Fig. 10.35 Normal adrenal gland. ( a ) Normal shape and appearance of adrenal gland in neonate.
( b ) Enlarged view nicely showing typical neonatal differentiation of adrenal medulla and cortex. ( c ) Atypical shape of neonatal adrenal gland due to missing right kidney
10 Ultrasound of the Urogenital Tract
NOTE : Differentiation of prominent adrenal gland (e.g. reactive to stress/other physiologic conditions) from hyperplasia/enlargement in other conditions may be impossible. Normal variations : Hypoplasia/aplasia; associated with severe hormonal defi cits if bilateral. Hypertrophy/hyperplasia diffi cult to defi ne sonographically, usually in combination with clinical symptoms/syndrome and respective hormonal fi ndings.

10.6.3 Pathologic Findings

10.6.3.1 Adrenal Gland Haemorrhage
Typically in newborns, asphyxia, after trauma/stress – but also with sepsis, systemic conditions.
• May occur fetally. Varies in size, uni- or bilateral.
• May cause displacement of surrounding structures (e.g. thus impairing renal blood fl ow with consequent renal vein thrombosis).
• Rupture/retroperitoneal haematoma/haematoperitoneum extremely rare.
US Findings
• Initially inhomogeneously echogenic enlargement of adrenal gland with shape of complex cyst (Fig. 10.36 ).
• Then increasingly hypoechoic with complex liquid aspect, septations, sedimentations.
• Shrinkage/resolution, potentially with some remnant calcifi cation (echogenic, with dorsal shadowing):
• Usually easy to differentiate from similar entities.
CDS : haemorrhagic cyst, complex dysplastic upper moiety of duplex kidney, para- renal/subcapsular haematoma, psoas haematoma/abscess, urinoma, cystic­haemorrhagic tumour. Role of US : In neonates US the ideal method; in older children sectional imaging may become necessary, as well as in equivocal situations (provided a therapeutic consequence).