Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5780_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
42 Мб
Скачать
3.3 Sonographic Nomenclature
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
x
Intra-abdominal lymph nodes: 5 scans (celiac, superior and inferior mesenteric groups, parietal retroperitoneal, and portal)
x
Gastrointestinal tract: Document according to findings. A complete workup should be documented by 9 scans: – Stomach: Fornix, body, antrumColon: Ileocecal; ascending, transverse and descending colon; sigmoid colon;
rectum
x
Genital organs: 2 scans each (uterus + adnexa or prostate + seminal vesicle; testicular scans may be added if required)
x
Urinary tract: 6 scans (renal pelvis and ureteropelvic junction on both sides, site where the ureter crosses over the iliac vessels on both sides, bladder transverse with prevesical ureter, bladder longitudinal)
x
Adrenal glands: 2 scans.

3.3 Sonographic Nomenclature

n
Note: When reporting sonographic findings, use proper nomenclature and try to
avoid using terms drawn from radiology.
n
The report consists of an accurate description of findings and the diagnosis. Struc­tures not adequately visualized are described as such in the report.
n
Criteria for evaluating findings: It is important to evaluate the location, size,
shape, margins, relations, internal echo pattern, consistency, and dynamics (of moving structures). Tenderness to pressure, compressibility, and movement with respiratory excursions should also be assessed.
n
Examples of terms used in ultrasound reporting (listed alphabetically):
x
Acoustic enhancement
x
Acoustic shadow (Fig. 64b)
x
Coarse (coarse granularity)
x
Defect
x
Density
x
Distribution
x
Echogenicity (Fig. 64): Hypoechoic, anechoic, echogenic, isoechoic, hyperechoic; internal echoes
x
Heterogeneous
x
Homogeneous
x
Intensity
x
Internal echo pattern
x
Irregular
x
Lesion
x
Loose (rarefied) echo texture
x
Margins
x
Nonhomogeneous
x
Nonuniform
x
Normal-appearing
x
Regular
x
Sharp
x
Spacing
x
Structure (structural defect)
x
Uniform
3
Documentation and Reporting
47
3.3 Sonographic Nomenclature
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
3
ab
Documentation and Reporting
c
d
Fig. 64a–d Examples of various internal echo patterns. a Echogenic pattern (arrow). b Hyperechoic (very echogenic) pattern with an acoustic shadow (S). c Hypoechoic pattern (arrows). d Anechoic pattern (C)
n
Individual echo characteristics and echo patterns
Table 8.Individual echoes and echo patterns
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Individual echoes Echo pattern
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Intensity
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Intense (high-level echoes in a dense arrangement)
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Echogenic, hyperechoic (Fig. 64a)
Scant (low-level echoes spaced far apart) Hypoechoic (Fig. 64c)
None (devoid of echoes) Anechoic (Fig. 64b)
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Distribution
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Uniform
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Homogeneous
Nonuniform Nonhomogeneous
48
4.2 Sonographic Measurements
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
4 Function Studies

4.1 Basic Principles

n
As well as static examinations that yield morphologic findings, functional ultra­sound studies can also be done. Since they involve the assessment of dynamic phenomena, these tests significantly expand our diagnostic capabilities by supply­ing information on organ functions.
n
The following tests have proved useful in routine situations :
x
Measurement of gallbladder contractions
x
Measurement of gastric emptying (p. 50)
x
Residual urine determination (p. 51)
x
Diuresis urography (p. 52).

4.2 Sonographic Measurements

Gallbladder Contractions
..............................................................................................................
n
Indications:
x
Suspected cystic duct obstruction
x
Prior to litholysis
x
Prior to lithotripsy
n
Measurement:
x
With a planimetry unit: Measure the maximum longitudinal area by scanning points around the gallbladder circumference (Figs.
65 and 66).
4

Function Studies

Fig. 65 Gallbladder planimetry for determining maximum longitudinal area
Fig. 66 Sonographic gallbladder planimetry for determining maximum longitudinal area. L = liver, GB = gallbladder
49
4.2 Sonographic Measurements
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
4
x
Without a planimetry unit : Measure the three greatest diameters in two planes and multiply them (length q depth q width) to calculate the gallbladder volume using the formula for an ellipsoid (sonographic residual urine determi­nation; see Fig.
n
Test meal: A large, fatty, nonstandardized breakfast or a standardized beverage
69).
(e.g., 350 mL of cocoa).
n
Procedure:
x
The gallbladder is measured in the fasted patient (see above).
Function Studies
x
The patient consumes a fatty breakfast (e.g., rolls with butter and cheese, 1 egg, and 1 cup of hot chocolate).
x
The measurements are repeated at intervals of approximately 10 min.
n
Findings:
x
More than a 50 % decrease in gallbladder volume indicates a significant contrac­tion. Gallbladder contractions are maximal at 30–45 min.
x
Contractions are absent or deficient in patients with cholecystitis, cystic duct obstruction, hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, or celiac disease.
Gastric Emptying
..............................................................................................................
n
Indications: Detection of impaired gastric motility, which may occur in diabetic
neuropathy, nondiabetic neuropathy, and systemic diseases.
n
Measurement: Cross-sectional area of the antrum in the aortomesenteric plane
(Figs.
67 and 68).
Fig. 67 Antral planimetry in the aortomesenteric plane
n
Test meal : Tea
n
Procedure:
x
The fasted patient is examined in the morning in the sitting or standing position.
x
Antral planimetry is carried out in the aortomesenteric plane.
x
The patient drinks 300 mL of unsweetened tea with a straw.
x
Antral planimetry is repeated at 5 min intervals.
n
Findings: Determine the time required for the maximum antral area measured
after ingestion of tea to return to the initial area measured before ingestion of tea:
x
Normal value : 25 min.
x
A value of 40 min or more signifies impaired gastric emptying.
50
4.2 Sonographic Measurements
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
Fig. 68 Sonographic antral planimetry. VMS = superior mesenteric vein, L = liver, AO = aorta, AN = antrum
Residual Urine Determination
..............................................................................................................
n
Indications: Determination of residual urine.
n
Measurement: Calculate bladder volume using the formula for an ellipsoid
(see below).
n
Procedure:
x
Have the patient empty the bladder completely.
x
Measure the residual urine volume sonographically using the formula (Fig. 69): volume (mL) = width (cm) q depth (cm) q length (cm) q 0.5.
4
Function Studies
ab
Fig. 69a, b a Measurement in transverse section. W = width, D = depth. b Measurement in sagittal section. L = length
n
Findings:
x
A residual urine volume I 50 mL is still within the normal range.
x
Bear in mind that the residual urine values calculated for small volumes are too large, and that those calculated for large volumes are too small.
51
4.2 Sonographic Measurements
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
4
Diuresis Urography
..............................................................................................................
n
Indications: Detection of subpelvic stenosis.
n
Measurement: Transverse diameter of the anechoic separation of the renal sinus
echo complex (Fig.
n
Test substance : Furosemide
n
Procedure:
x
Measure the transverse diameter of the central echo complex at the widest
Function Studies
point (Fig.
x
Administer 20 mg of furosemide by i.v. bolus.
x
Repeat the measurement at 5 min and 15 min.
n
Findings:
x
In a normal examination, the separation of the central echo complex measured
70).
71).
at 15 min is less than the separation measured at 5 min.
x
If the separation increases or shows no change, an obstructive subpelvic steno­sis should be suspected.
Fig. 70 Measurement of the separation of the renal sinus echo complex
Fig. 71 Sonographic measurement. ++ = separation of central echo complex, K = kidney
52
5.1 Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB)
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
5 Interventional Ultrasound

5.1 Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB)

Preparations and Technique
..............................................................................................................
n
Setup (Fig. 72): The supplies include sterile drapes and gloves.
n
Prerequisites:
x
Adequate coagulation: Quick PT i 70 %, platelets i 100 000/mm3. Factor analy- sis (e.g., factor XIII) may be indicated in patients with a hematologic systemic disease.
x
Secure informed consent.
x
Confirm a safe puncture route.
Fig. 72 Materials for fine-needle aspiration biopsy: 1 Syringe, needle, razor, local anesthesia.
2 Syringe with citrate. 3 Angiomed core needles.
Otto needles 0.8 mm,
0.95 mm, 1.2 mm, or 4 glass slides with a for­malin-filled Eppendorf tube
5

Interventional Ultrasound

n
Technique with a FNAB transducer (Fig. 73):
x
To maintain asepsis, the transducer must be sterilized (e.g., by placing it in dis­infectant solution), and it may be necessary to line the guide channel of the biopsy transducer with sterile film. An antiseptic spray can be used as the ultra­sound coupling medium.
x
Visualize the target lesion (Figs. 74a, 75a).
x
Mark the puncture route (Figs. 74b, 75b).
x
Measure the depth of needle insertion (Figs. 74b, 75b).
x
Anesthetize the puncture site.
x
Swiftly advance the biopsy needle along the designated path under sonographic guidance.
x
Remove the inner stylet, and visually check the position of the needle tip echo at the target site (Figs.
x
Apply gentle suction and rotate the core needle to sample material for cytohis-
74b, 75c).
tologic analysis.
53
5.1 Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB)
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
5
Interventional Ultrasound
Fig. 73a–c Ultrasound-guided percutaneous FNAB
54
5.1 Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB)
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
ab
Fig. 74a, b Fine-needle aspiration biopsy. a Rounded, hypoechoic intrasplenic mass (TU). b The lesion is visualized, here using a linear transducer with a central biopsy channel. The needle path is marked on the screen. The insertion depth is measured (arrow), and the posi tion of the tip echo at the target site (arrow) is checked. S = spleen
5
Interventional Ultrasound
abc
Fig. 75a–c FNAB. a Elliptical, hypoechoic mass (TU) in the region of the right adrenal gland. L = liver. b The mass is visualized, the needle path is marked, and the depth is measured (arrowhead). c The position of the tip echo at the target site (arrow) is checked
55
5.1 Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB)
Schmidt, Ultrasound © 2007 Thieme
All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license.
5
n
Preparation of the sample:
x
Expel the material (mixed with citrate) onto a glass slide.
x
Transfer larger tissue particles into a formalin-filled Eppendorf tube.
x
Spread out and air-dry the cytologic sample.
x
Liquid samples should undergo cytologic and bacteriologic analysis (Fig. 76).
Interventional Ultrasound
abc
Fig. 76a–c Therapeutic fine-needle aspiration and drainage. a Rounded, sharply circumscribed intrasplenic mass with a nonhomogeneous internal echo pattern. b Diagnostic fine-needle aspiration yielded abscess material. Arrow: needle tip echo. c The abscess material (140 mL) was therapeutically evacuated at the same sitting. S = spleen, A = abscess
Indications and Guidelines for Specific Organs
..............................................................................................................
n
Liver:
x
Indications: Investigation of diffuse and focal abnormalities.
n
Note: With superficial lesions, make sure the lesion is biopsied through normal
liver tissue.
n
Spleen:
x
Indications: Abscess, primary focal lesions (Figs. 74, 76).
n
Note: The spleen is a very vascular organ, and strict criteria should be applied
in patient selection.
n
Pancreas:
x
Indication: Carcinoma
n
Note: It is unnecessary to establish a preoperative histologic diagnosis for inde-
terminate pancreatic masses that are localized and operable.
x
FNAB of a pancreatic mass is unnecessary if diagnostic imaging indicates a malignant tumor and operative treatment is planned.
n
Adrenal gland:
x
Indication: Indeterminate mass lesion (Fig. 75).
!
Caution: Before puncturing an adrenal mass, first exclude pheochromocytoma
clinically and by laboratory tests.
n
Lymph nodes :
x
Indications: Malignant lymphoma, metastasis, reactive lymphadenopathy.
x
Limitations: FNAB is inadequate in most cases for the evaluation of a suspected malignant lymphoma; surgical lymphadenectomy is usually required.
56