Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_104_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
42 Мб
Скачать
Molecular coagulation andthrombophilia 213
https://t.me/med1917
should be reassessed at least on an annual basis as the clinical situation might change over time. Thus, the risks and bene­fits of an extended anticoagulation must be balanced with a number of different considerations, including the patient’s own preferences. However, despite new clinical data being added all the time, there is no general consensus regarding diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of symptomatic patients with VTE.
When the FV Leiden allele is present in homozygous form, or heterozygosity is combined with a second genetic defect, prophylactic treatment with heparin or oral antico­agulants is recommended in situations known to be associ­ated with a high risk of thromboembolic complications, such as surgery or pregnancy, even if the patient has never experi­enced any thrombosis or has no family history of such com­plications. For heterozygous asymptomatic carriers lacking a family history of thrombosis, short- term prophylaxis has been recommended in high- risk situations, but it remains to be established whether prophylaxis should be given in all situations associated with a risk of thrombosis.
Symptomatic heterozygous patients should be managed in the same way as any other patient with thrombotic events until more specific recommendations are established. Current data suggests that there is no increase in thrombosis recurrence risk in patients with heterozygosity for either fac­tor V Leiden or the prothrombin gene mutation. Patients with combined defects, and probably also patients with defi­ciency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S, may be at increased risk of recurrence and should accordingly be given long- term anticoagulation therapy beyond six months, even after an isolated thromboembolic event. However, more data are needed before these recommendations can be considered generally applicable.
The potential benefits of general screening for APC resist­ance and/or the FV Leiden allele prior to thrombotic events or in the presence of such circumstantial factors as oral con­traceptive use, pregnancy, and surgery are obvious, but more prospective data are needed, not least in terms of cost–ben­efit ratios before any general recommendations can be made.
Conclusions
Inherited APC resistance, caused by the Arg506Gln muta­tion in the FV gene (FV Leiden), is the most common genetic risk factor for thrombosis identified to date. The mutated FV has normal procoagulant properties, but the loss of the APC cleavage site at position 506in FV results in impaired regula­tion of coagulation and a hypercoagulable state. The preva­lence of FV Leiden in Caucasian populations varies between 2% and 15%. A genetic variant in the prothrombin gene (G20210A) is another common prothrombotic risk factor, with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the general popula-
tion. Other less common independent genetic risk factors include abnormalities in the genes for AT, protein C, and protein S. Families with thrombophilia present with variable penetrance of thrombosis explained by different combina­tions of genetic defects and environmental risk factors. Patients with combined genetic defects are at higher risk of thrombosis than those with single gene defects. Thus, evalu­ation of patients with thrombosis must be performed in order to fully estimate the risk for thrombosis in each case.
Further reading
Blood coagulation: introduction andregulation
Camire, R., M. (2016). Rethinking events in the haemostatic process:
role of factor V and TFPI. Haemophilia 22 (Suppl 5): 3–8.
Dahlbäck, B. (2005). Blood coagulation and its regulation by anticoagu-
lant pathways: genetic pathogenesis of bleeding and thrombotic diseases. J. Intern. Med. 257: 209–223.
Dahlbäck, B. and Villoutreix, B., O. (2005). Regulation of blood
coagulation by the protein C anticoagulant pathway: novel insights into structure–function relationships and molecular recognition. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25: 1311–1320.
Dahlbäck, B. (2016). Pro-
pathogenesis of thrombosis and bleeding disorders. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 38 (Suppl 1): 4–11.
Dahlbäck, B. (2017). Novel insights into the regulation of coagulation
by factor V isoforms, tissue factor pathway inhibitoralpha, and protein S. J. Thromb. Haemost. 15: 1241–1250.
Dahlbäck, B. (2023, 2023). Natural anticoagulant discovery, the gift
thatkeeps on giving: finding FV­716–727.
Dahlbäck, B., Guo, L., G., Livaja-
V- short and protein S as synergistic tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPIa) cofactors. Res. Pract. Throm. Haemost. 2: 114–124.
Dahlbäck, B. and Tran, S. (2022). The preAR2 region (1458–1492) in
factor V­ activity with protein S and the assembly of a trimolecular factor Xa- inhibitory complex comprising FV- short, protein S, and TFPIalpha. J. Thromb. Haemost. 20: 58–68.
Dahlbäck, B. and Tran, S. (2022). A hydrophobic patch (PLVIVG;
1481–1486) in the B- domain of factor V- short is crucial for its syner­gistic TFPIa- cofactor activity with protein S and for the formation of the FXa- inhibitory complex comprising FV- short, TFPIa and protein S. J. Thromb. Haemost. 20: 1146–1157.
Di Cera, E., Mohammed, B., M., Pelc, L., A., and Stojanovski, B.M.
(2022). Cryo­Haemost. 6 (7): e12830. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12830.
Esmon, C.T. (2014). Targeting factor Xa and thrombin: impact on
coagulation and beyond. Thromb. Haemost. 111: 625–633.
Furie, B. and Furie, B.C. (2005). Thrombus formation in vivo. J. Clin.
Investig. 115: 3355–3362.
Long, A.T., Kenne, E., Jung, R. etal. (2016). Contact system revisited: an
interface between inflammation, coagulation, and innate immunity. J. Thromb. Haemost. 14: 427–437.
short is crucial for the synergistic TFPIalpha- cofactor
EM structures of coagulation factors. Res. Pract. Thromb.
and anticoagulant properties of factor V in
short. J. Thromb. Haemost. 21 (4):
Koshiar, R., and Tran, S. (2017). Factor
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
214 Molecular Hematology
https://t.me/med1917
Naudin, C., Burillo, E., Blankenberg, S. etal. (2017). Factor XII contact
activation. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 43: 814–826.
Mann, K.G., Brummel-
Models of blood coagulation. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 36: 108–117.
Mast, A.E. and Ruf, W. (2022). Regulation of coagulation by tissue
factor pathway inhibitor: implications for hemophilia therapy. J.Thromb. Haemost. 20: 1290–1300.
Morrissey, J.H. and Smith, S.A. (2015). Polyphosphate as modulator of
hemostasis, thrombosis and inflammation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 13 (Suppl 1): S92–S97.
Papareddy, P., Rossnagel, M., Doreen Hollwedel, F. et al. (2019). A
human antithrombin isoform dampens inflammatory responses and protects from organ damage during bacterial infection. Nat.Microbiol. 4: 2442–2455.
Petrillo, T., Ayombil, F., Van’t Veer, C., and Camire, R.M. (2021).
Regulation of factor V and factor V­between B­296: 100234.
Rau, J.C., Beaulieu, L.M., Huntington, J.A., and Church, F.C. (2007).
Serpins in thrombosis, hemostasis and fibrinolysis. J. Thromb. Hemost. 5 (Suppl 1): 102–115.
Rezaie, A.R. and Giri, H. (2020). Anticoagulant and signaling functions
of antithrombin. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18: 3142–3153.
Vincent, L.M., Tran, S., Livaja, R. et al. (2013). Coagulation factor V
(A2440G) causes East Texas bleeding disorder via TFPIα. J. Clin. Invest. 123: 3777–3787.
domain proteolysis and binding. J. Biolumin. Chemilumin.
Ziedins, K., Orfeo, T., and Butenas, S. (2006).
short by TFPIalpha: relationship
Molecular genetics ofvenous thromboembolism, APC resistance, andFV Leiden
Bertina, R.M., Koeleman, B.P., Koster, T. et al. (1994). Mutation in
blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance to activated protein C. Nature 369: 64–67.
Bezemer, I.D., Bare, L.A., Doggen, C.J.M. etal. (2008). Gene variants
associated with deep venous thrombosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 299: 1306–1314.
Castoldi, E. and Rosing, J. (2010). APC resistance: biological basis and
acquired influences. J. Thromb. Haemost. 8: 445–453.
Castoldi, E., Hezard, N., Mourey, G. etal. (2021). Severe thrombophilia
in a factor V­mutation (FV Besancon). J. Thromb. Haemost. 19: 1186–1199.
Dahlbäck, B., Carlsson, M., and Svensson, P.J. (1993). Familial throm-
bophilia due to a previously unrecognized mechanism characterized by poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C: prediction of a cofactor to activated protein C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90: 1004–1008.
Elsebaie, M.A.T., van Es, N., Langston, A. etal. (2019). Direct oral anti-
coagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombo­philia: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 17 (4): 645–656.
Greengard, J.S., Sun, X., Xu, X. etal. (1994). Activated protein C resist-
ance caused by Arg506Gln mutation in factor Va. Lancet 343: 1361–1362.
Griffin, J.H., Evatt, B., Wideman, C., and Fernandez, J.A. (1993).
Anticoagulant protein C pathway defective in majority of thrombo­philic patients. Blood 82: 1989–1993.
deficient patient homozygous for the Ala2086Asp
Heit, J.A. (2008). The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the
community. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28: 370–372.
Khan, F., Tritschler, T., Kahn, S.R., and Rodger, M.A. (2021). Venous
thromboembolism. Lancet 398 (10294): 64–77.
Koster, T., Rosendaal, F.R., de Ronde, H. etal. (1993). Venous thrombo-
sis due to poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C: Leiden Thrombophilia Study. Lancet 342: 1503–1506.
Lindqvist, P.G., Svensson, P.J., Dahlbäck, B., and Marsal, K. (1998).
Factor V R506Q mutation (activated protein C resistance) associated with reduced intrapartum blood loss: a possible evolutionary selec­tion mechanism. Thromb. Hemost. 79: 69–73.
Nogami, K., Shinozawa, K., Ogiwara, K. et al. (2014). Novel FV nutation
(W1920R, FVNara) associated with serious deep vein thrombosis and more potent APC resistance relative to FVLeiden. Blood 123: 2420–2428.
Pezeshkpoor, B., Castoldi, E., Mahler, A. etal. (2016). Identification and
functional characterization of a novel F5 mutation (Ala512Val, FVBonn) associated with activated protein C resistance. J. Thromb. Haemost. 14: 1353–1363.
Svensson, P.J. and Dahlbäck, B. (1994). Resistance to activated protein C
as a basis for venous thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 330: 517–522.
Vandenbroucke, J.P., Koster, T., Briet, E. etal. (1994). Increased risk of
venous thrombosis in oral- contraceptive users who are carriers of factor V Leiden mutation. Lancet 344: 1453–1457.
Voorberg, J., Roelse, J., Koopman, R. etal. (1994). Association of idio-
pathic venous thromboembolism with single point­Arg506 of factor V. Lancet 343: 1535–1536.
Wolberg, A.S., Rosendaal, F.R., Weitz, J.I. etal. (2015). Venous throm-
bosis. Nat. Rev. Dis Primers. 7 (1): 15006.
Zöller, B., Svensson, P.J., Dahlbäck, B. etal. (2020). Genetic risk factors for
venous thromboembolism. Expert Rev. Hematol. 13 (9): 971–981.
mutation at
Antithrombin deficiency
Van Cott, E.M., Orlando, C., Moore, G.W. et al. (2020). For the sub-
committee on plasma coagulation inhibitors. Recommendations for clinical laboratory testing for antithrombin deficiency; communica­tion from the SSC of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18: 17–22.
Mulder, R., Croles, F.N., Mulder, A.B. et al. (2017). SERPINC1 gene
mutations in antithrombin deficiency. B. J. Haematol. 178: 279–285.
de la Morena-
(2016). Hypoglycosylation is a common finding in antithrombin deficiency in the absence of a SERPINC1 gene defect. J. Thromb. Haemost. 14: 1549–1560.
Corral, J., del la Morena-
genetics of antithrombin. Thromb. Res. 169: 23–29.
Bravo- Pérez, C., de la Morena- Barrio, M.E., de la Morena- Barrio, B.
et al. (2022). Molecular and clinical characterization of transient antithrombin deficiency: a new concept in congenital thrombo­philia. Am. J. Hematol. 97: 216–225.
Barrio, M.E., Martínez- Martínez, I., de Cos, C. et al.
Barrio, M.E., and Vicente, V. (2018). The
Protein C system andprotein C deficiency
Dahlbäck, B. and Villoutreix, B.O. (2005). Regulation of blood coagula-
tion by the protein C anticoagulant pathway: novel insights into structure–function relationships and molecular recognition. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25: 1311–1320.
Esmon, C.T. (2012). Protein C anticoagulant system –anti- inflammatory
effects. Semin. Immunopathol. 34: 127–132.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Molecular coagulation andthrombophilia 215
https://t.me/med1917
Griffin, J.H., Zlokovic, B.V., and Mosnier, L.O. (2015). Activated protein
C: biased for translation. Blood 127: 2898–2907.
Segers, K., Dahlbäck, B., and Nicolaes, G.A. (2007). Coagulation factor
V and thrombophilia: background and mechanisms. Thromb. Hemost. 98: 530–542.
Dinarvand, P. and Moser, K.A. (2019). Protein C deficiency. Arch.
Pathol. Lab Med. 143: 1281–1285.
Seidel, H., Haracska, B., Naumann, J. etal. (2020). Laboratory limita-
tions of excluding hereditary protein C deficiency by chromogenic assay: discrepancies of phenotype and genotype. Clini. Appl. Thromb. Haemost. 26: 1–13.
Cooper, P.C., Pavlova, A., Moore, G.W. etal. (2020). Recommendations
for clinical laboratory testing for protein C deficiency, for the sub­committee on plasma coagulation inhibitors of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18: 271–277.
Minford, A., Brandão, L.R., Othman, M. et al. (2022). Diagnosis and
management of severe congenital protein C deficiency (SCPCD): communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 20: 1735–1743.
Protein S andprotein S deficiency
Dahlbäck, B. (2007). The tale of protein S and C4b- binding protein, a
story of affection. Thromb. Hemost. 98: 90–96.
Dahlbäck, B. (2018). Vitamin K-
tein C pathway. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 44: 176–184.
Gandrille, S., Borgel, D., Sala, N. etal. (2000). Protein S deficiency: a
data base of mutations. Summary of the first update. Thromb. Haemost. 84: 918–934.
Garcia de Frutos, G., Fuentes- Prior, P., Hurtado, B., and Sala, N. (2007).
Molecular basis of protein S deficiency. Thromb. Haemost. 98: 543–556.
Gierula, M. and Ahnstrom, J. (2020). Anticoagulant protein S-
on interactions and functions. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18: 2801–2811.
Johansson, A.M., Hillarp, A., Säll, T. etal. (2005). Large deletions of the
PROS1 gene in a large fraction of mutation negative patients with protein S deficiency. Thromb. Haemost. 94: 951–957.
Peraramelli, S., Rosing, J., and Hackeng, T.M. (2012). TFPI- dependent
activities of protein S. Thromb. Res. 129 (Suppl 2): S23–S26.
Sim, M.M.S. and Wood, J.P. (2022). Dysregulation of protein S in
COVID-
19. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 35: 101376.
Marlar, R.A., Gausman, J.N., Tsuda, H. etal. (2020). Recommendations
for clinical laboratory testing for protein S deficiency: communica­tions from the SSC Committee plasma coagulation inhibitors of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 19: 68–74.
Brinkman, H.J.M., Ahnström, J., Casatoldi, E. etal. (2021). Pleiotropic
anticoagulant functions of protein S, consequences for the clinical laboratory. Communications from the SSC of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 19: 281–286.
dependent protein S: beyond the pro-
New insights
Prothrombin gene mutations
Bulato, C., Radu, C.M., Campello, E. et al. (2016). New prothrombin
mutation (Arg596Trp, prothrombin Padua 2) associated with venous thromboembolism. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 36: 1022–1029.
Danckwardt, S., Hartmann, K., Gehring, N.H. etal. (2006). 3 End pro-
cessing of the prothrombin mRNA in thrombophilia. Acta Haematol. 115: 192–197.
Dziadosz, M. and Baxi, L.V. (2016). Global prevalence of prothrombin
gene mutation G20210A and implications in women’s health: a sys­tematic review. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 27: 481–489.
Gehring, N.H., Frede, U., Neu-
ciency of mRNA 3 end formation: a new genetic mechanism con­tributing to hereditary thrombophilia. Nat. Genet. 28: 389–392.
Miyawaki, Y., Suzuki, A., Fujita, J. etal. (2012). Thrombosis from a pro-
thrombin mutation conveying antithrombin resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. 366: 2390–2396.
Poort, S.R., Rosendaal, F.R., Reitsma, P.H., and Bertina, R.M. (1996). A
common genetic variation in the 3­thrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood 88: 3698–3703.
Yilik, G. et al. (2001). Increased effi-
untranslated region of the pro-
VTE andgenome- wide association studies
Lindström, S., Wang, L., Smith, E.N. et al. (2019). Genomic and tran-
scriptomic association studies identify 16novel susceptibility loci for venous thromboembolism. Blood 134: 1645–1657.
Klarin, D., Busenkell, E., Judy, R. etal. (2019). Genome-
tion analysis of venous thromboembolism identifies new risk loci and genetic overlap with arterial vascular disease. Nat. Genet. 51: 1574–1579.
Zöller, B., Svensson, P.J., Dahlbäck, B. etal. (2020). Genetic risk factors
for venous thromboembolism. Exp. Rev. Hematol. 13: 971–981.
Ghouse, J., Tragante, V., Ahlberg, G. etal. (2023). Genome-
analysis identifies 93 risk loci and enables risk prediction equivalent to monogenic forms of venous thromboembolism. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-
022- 01286- 7 55: 399–409.
wide associa-
wide meta-
Management ofthrombophilia
Moran, J. and Bauer, K.A. (2020). Managing thromboembolic risk in
patients with hereditary and acquired thrombophilias. Blood 135: 344–350.
Stevens, S.M., Woller, S.C., Baumann Kreuziger, L. et al. (2021).
Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. CHEST 160: e545–e608.
Khan, F., Tritschler, T., Kahn, S.R., and Rodger, M.A. (2021). Venous
thromboembolism. Lancet 398: 64–77.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
https://t.me/med1917
Chapter16
https://t.me/med1917
The molecular basis ofhemophilia
Keith Gomez
Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis Unit, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Introduction: clinical features of hemophilia, 217 Inheritance of hemophilia, 218 Molecular basis of hemophilia A, 219 Molecular basis of hemophilia B, 221
Introduction: clinical features ofhemophilia
The clinical severity (bleeding phenotype) is correlated with the concentration of circulating factor VIII, or IX, in the plasma, and severe hemophilia is defined by a clotting factor concentration below 1 IU/dL (Table16.1). The hallmark of severe hemophilia, in the absence of treatment, is recurrent and spontaneous hemarthrosis. Typically, hinge joints such as the knees, elbows, and ankles are affected, but bleeds may also occur in the wrist or shoulder. Bleeding into the ball and socket hip and shoulder joints is less frequent. The acutely affected joint becomes swollen and warm, and held in a posi­tion of flexion (Figure16.1), with no external discoloration or bruising around the joint. It is unusual for an infant to suffer spontaneous hemarthroses in the first few months of life, and the first joint to be affected tends to be the ankle as the child learns to crawl. The first sign of hemarthrosis in an infant will often be obvious discomfort and distress, accom­panied by limping or reluctance to use a limb. Recurrent bleeds into a joint, leading to synovitis and joint damage, ultimately result in crippling arthritis (Figure16.2). Bleeding into muscles is also a feature of severe hemophilia, but this is usually a consequence of direct injury, albeit often minor (Figure16.3). Bleeds into limb muscles are particularly dan­gerous because of the risk of compression of neighboring structures manifesting as a compartment syndrome. Patients with inhibitory antibodies to the deficient factor are par­ticularly at risk in this regard, as bleeds may be more difficult to control. Bleeds in the tongue can obstruct the airway, and retroperitoneal bleeding within the iliopsoas muscle may result in femoral nerve compression, causing paresthesia in the anterior thigh, weakness, and wasting of leg muscles (Figure 16.3). Bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract (melena) and bleeding into the urinary tract (hematuria) may
Inhibitor formation: etiology and clinical implications, 222 Therapeutic applications of molecular biology to patient care, 224 Conclusions, 229 Further reading, 229
also occur. There is also a significant risk of intracranial hemorrhage in severe hemophilia, which in the past was a significant cause of mortality when treatment was not so readily available. Higher levels of factor VIII, or IX, above 5
IU/dL are associated with a milder form of the disease, with no spontaneous joint bleeds but a definite risk of bleeding after even relatively minor injury or procedures (e.g. dental extraction).
For decades, the only effective treatment was replacement therapy with intravenous injection of coagulation factor con­centrates (CFC). Preventive infusions of CFC are the gold standard of care (prophylaxis therapy). Patients regularly inject CFC intravenously (most commonly two to four times a week) to prevent bleeds rather than just treating on demand after bleeds or after an injury has occurred. The dose and frequency of prophylaxis infusions are determined by the half- life of the chosen CFC and increasingly after identifying the pharmacokinetics (PK) of that CFC in the candidate patient. Prophylaxis aims to maintain a measurable plasma level of clotting factor activity above the patient’s baseline (trough level) just prior to the next CFC prophylaxis dose. Patients on prophylactic therapy experience few or even no spontaneous bleeds, and thus progressive joint damage and arthritis can be minimized or avoided. The quality of life of patients on prophylaxis may be greatly enhanced, allowing them to lead much more independent lives.
Approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A can be expected to develop inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII CFC at some stage. In contrast, inhibitor development in hemophilia B is very rare and encountered in less than 5% of patients. The development of such antibodies poses con­siderable problems in treatment as these immunoglobulins (IgG) are capable of rapidly inactivating infused factor VIII, and furthermore, the antibody titer may rise dramatically after a course of factor VIII (anamnesis). Very occasionally,
Molecular Hematology, Fifth Edition. Edited by Drew Provan and Hillard M. Lazarus. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2024 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
217
218 Molecular Hematology
https://t.me/med1917
Table16.1 The relation ofblood levels offactor VIII (or IX) tothe severity ofhemorrhagic manifestations
Level (IU/dL) Hemorrhagic manifestations
>40 No increase in bleeding symptoms >5–40 Mild hemophilia. Bleeding typically occurs only after
significant injuries
1–5 Moderately severe hemophilia: Spectrum of bleed
phenotype– some with spontaneous bleeds and early arthropathy, others experiencing bleeds associated with injury, albeit often relatively minor
<1 Severe hemophilia with spontaneous and recurrent
bleeding into muscles and joints. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage
Figure16.2 Radiograph of the knee of a patient with severe hemophilic arthropathy. Joint replacement surgery was subsequently carried out in this case.
Figure16.1 Acute hemarthrosis in severe hemophilia. This usually arises in the absence of injury. The joints most frequently involved are the knees, elbows, and ankles. The joint is swollen, warm, and tender, but there is no external bruising or discoloration.
acquired hemophilia A may arise in a previously normal individual due to the formation of autoantibodies directed against factor VIII, and both males and females may be affected. Hemarthrosis is unusual in acquired hemophilia, and the principal manifestations are usually extensive super­ficial purpura and muscle bleeds. Acquired hemophilia arises most often in the elderly, associated with underlying malig­nant or autoimmune diseases in approximately half of cases, with a small, younger cohort associated with pregnancy.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Figure16.3 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing bilateral iliopsoas hemorrhage. This bleed was associated with a complete but transient paralysis in both legs, as the femoral nerve is located on the anterior surface of the muscle and may be compressed in such cases.
Inheritance ofhemophilia
The genes for factors VIII and IX (F8 and F9, respectively) are both located at the telomeric end of the X chromosome and thus hemophilia is inherited as an X- linked recessive condition. The daughters of affected males are obligate car­riers, but the sons are normal. The phenotype remains con­stant within a family, so the daughter of a man with only mild hemophilia may be reassured that she will not pass on a severe form of the condition. However, up to a half of all
The molecular basis ofhemophilia 219
0
Cu
Removal of signal (pre-) peptide
Binding to FIXa
50 100 150 200 kb
186 kbp
https://t.me/med1917
cases of hemophilia arise in the absence of a previous family history and are due to a new mutation. The most famous example is that of Queen Victoria, who had a hemophilic son (Leopold) and two daughters (Alice and Beatrice) who turned out to be carriers. Forensic genetic testing on exhumed remains of the assassinated Russian royal family has since proven the royal hemophilia to be severe hemo­philia B. There are instances of hemophilia affecting females due to inheritance of the defective gene from both parents and there are also case reports of hemophilia in females withTurner syndrome (XO karyotype) and androgen insen­sitivity syndrome (XY karyotype). A proportion of females carrying a hemophilia gene have factor activity levels, from that corresponding gene, below recognized laboratory nor­mal ranges through a process called skewed Lyonization. These girls/women effectively have mild hemophilia and should be identified and offered care commensurate with their levels, as would be offered to boys/men with equivalent factor levels. The remaining carrier women havenormal laboratory range factor activity in their plasma. Importantly, normal plasma factor activity can NOT be
used as a surrogate marker of whether a daughter of a carrier mother is a carrier herself. Genetic testing will always be required to clarify true carriership.
Molecular basis ofhemophilia A
Factor VIII is an essential cofactor for the activation of factor X by activated factor IX (see Chapter17). Factor VIII must itself undergo proteolytic cleavage at three distinct sites through the action of thrombin before it becomes physiolog­ically active. It circulates in plasma as a large glycoprotein bound non- covalently to the larger protein, von Willebrand factor (VWF). The factor VIII gene (F8) was first cloned in
1984. It is 186 kb in length and is situated on the long arm of the X chromosome at Xq28 (Figure16.4). The factor VIII gene consists of 26 exons, which range in size from 69 bp (exon 5) to 3.1 kb (exon 14). The factor VIII mRNA is nearly 9 kb in size and encodes a mature protein of 2332 amino acids. Approximately half of all cases of severe hemophilia and all cases of mild and moderate hemophilia result from
89 11 12
1234 56 7
1
20 760393170920392192
PreA1
19 3551667
A1 BA2 A3 C1 C2
Cleavage by Thrombin
Figure16.4 Translation of the F8 gene into the Factor VIII protein. The top panel shows the F8 gene with exons colored according to the domains that are translated from them. Exon numbers are given above the gene map. The positions of the homologous sequences that are involved in inversion events are shown (int1h- 1 and int22h- 1). The primary translated product is the FVIII precursor. Start and end amino acid numbers for each domain are shown. Removal of the signal (pre- ) peptide generates the mature FVIII procofactor that circulates in plasma. Cleavage by thrombin after the arginine residues shown in red activates the protein by removing the B and a3 domains.
10 13 14
A2 A3 C1 C2
72920382191 2351
a1
a1 a2
Arg372 Arg740 Arg1689
a2 a3
a1 a2
A1
B
A2 A3 C1 C2
2+
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
int22h-1int1h-1
2351 aa FVIII Precursor
Binding to VWF
a3
2332 aa
1383 aa
26
F8
Gene
Mature FVIII procofactor
Activated FVIII (FVIIIa)
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
220 Molecular Hematology
int22h-3 int22h-2int22h-1
Normal
T
Telomere
Centromere
https://t.me/med1917
heterogeneous single nucleotide variations that occur throughout the F8 gene.
By far, the commonest single genetic defect causing severe hemophilia is an inversion in intron 22, which is encoun­tered in as many as 40% of people with severe hemophilia A in all ethnic groups. The inversion mechanism occurs as a result of homologous recombination between nearly identi­cal sequences in intron 22 and outside the gene (Figure16.5). Homologous recombination is a key part of the evolutionary process that promotes genetic diversity and trait develop­ment through generations. During meiosis, homologous sequences recombine between both alleles of most genes, but as males have only one X chromosome, the single F8 allele is prone to recombination with extragenic sequences. This results in a rearrangement that disrupts the gene. In sporadic cases of hemophilia (those without a family history), the rearrangement occurs in about 80% of cases during grandpa­ternal spermatogenesis. This means that 80% of mothers in sporadic cases are themselves carriers through having inher­ited the hemophilia- causing variant. The inversion was pre­viously identified through Southern blotting. This required radioactive labelling of gene probes and for safety reasons is no longer the preferred detection method. Most laboratories now use either inverse polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or long- range PCR for identification of this inversion. Inversions in intron 1 of the F8 gene have also been identified as a cause of severe hemophilia and this abnormality appears tobe responsible for approximately 5% of all cases of severe hemophilia. Since approximately half of all cases of severe hemophilia are associated with these two inversions, it is
usual practice to screen samples from new cases for these two abnormalities first.
Developments in molecular biology have permitted more rapid identification of defects in hemophilia. Southern blotting has been superseded by methods involving PCR amplification of either patient DNA or material derived from the reverse transcription of mRNA (RT- PCR). Automated sequence analyzers, enabling sequencing of the entire F8 gene, are now more affordable. Where not availa­ble, previous methods may still be relevant to identify restricted areas of abnormal DNA in patients with hemo­philia, which may then be targeted for specific attention. These methods include amplification and mismatch detec­tion (AMD), conformation- sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), high- resolution melting analysis (HRM), and pyrosequenc­ing. Approximately 4% of cases of hemophilia are the conse­quence of gene deletions, which have been reported throughout the gene and are very variable in size. As with the intron 22inversion, most deletions are associated with a severe clinical phenotype.
To date, over 3000 unique variants causing hemophilia A have been identified of which about 2050 are single nucleo­tide or point variations (EAHAD F8 database at https://f8­db.eahad.org/index.php accessed in June 2023) (Figure16.6). Previously referred to as “mutations,” that term is no longer recommended by the Human Genome Variation Society because of the difficulty in establishing pathogenicity in some cases. “Polymorphism” is no longer used for the same reason and both terms have been replaced in clinical practice
ype 1 inversion
Figure16.5 The intron 22inversion. Mechanism of the intron 22inversion that causes 40% of cases of severe hemophilia A. The top panel
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
shows the normal F8 gene with exons clustered and colored according to the domains they are translated into. Intron 22 contains a sequence in red, int22h- 1, that has two homologous copies positioned some 400 kbp telomeric of the gene but orientated in the opposite direction. When homologous recombination occurs during meiosis, the int22h- 1 sequence may recombine with one of the homologous copies: int22h- 2 or int22h- 3. Because the sequences are orientated in opposite directions, this leads to inversion of the intervening sequence so that exons 1–22 of F8 are now facing the wrong direction and separated from exons 23–26 by 400 kbp as shown in the lower panel. This leads to complete disruption of the gene and abolition of transcription.
400 kbp
int22h-3 int22h-2 int22h-1
15–21 18–13 2–7
22 14 1
1 2–7 8–13 15–21 24–26
14
400 kbp
22
23
24–2623
<1%
Large indels
https://t.me/med1917
7%
Small indels
16%
Missense/nonsense
47%
The molecular basis ofhemophilia 221
yield a GT mismatch that is inefficiently repaired. It is also of interest that a missense mutation may be associated with varying degrees of clinical severity. Thus, a C → T mutation at nucleotide 1689within exon 14, resulting in the replace­ment of arginine by cysteine has been reported in association with both severe and mild clinical phenotypes.
Complex
rearrangements
21%
2–5%
Figure16.6 Relative frequency of different variant types associated with hemophilia A. Uniquely among monogenic disorders, complex rearrangements in the F8 gene cause a fifth of all cases of hemophilia and 45% of severe cases. Single nucleotide variants (shown in various shades of gray) are still responsible for the majority of cases.
None
Splice
5%
Regulatory
by “variant” with a pathogenicity classification. The majority of missense F8 variants result in non- severe forms of hemo­philia A. A further 340lead to the creation of preliminary peptide chain termination or premature stop codons and the production of truncated factor VIII molecules devoid of any functional activity. About 740 frameshift variations resulting from insertions or small deletions have also been identified as a cause of severe hemophilia. 936 unique copy number variants (duplications, insertions, or a combination of both) have also been identified in the F8 gene. Accurate identifica­tion of carriers of these variants requires specific techniques such as multiplex ligation- dependent probe amplification (MLPA). A full list of variants described in association with hemophilia is outside the scope of this chapter, but addi­tional information is provided in the Further reading section at the EAHAD Coagulation Factor Variant Databases web­site (https://dbs.eahad.org). Knowledge of an individual’s F8 variant has relevance to predicting inhibitor risk: the more severe the variant and resultant absence of translated protein, increasing the risk. However, even missense variants result­ing in single amino acid changes can still provoke an alloim­mune response, resulting in clinically important antibody formation (inhibitor).
Approximately 40% of all missense mutations arise at CG dinucleotide sites, resulting in a change to TG or CA sequences. It is generally believed that CG nucleotides repre­sent genomic hotspots. Cytosine is predominantly methyl­ated in human DNA, but this is relatively unstable and 5- methylcytosine is prone to spontaneous deamination to
Molecular basis ofhemophilia B
The factor IX gene (F9) is also located on the long arm of the X chromosome at band Xq27, and is encoded by a stretch of DNA spanning 33.5 kb that contains eight exons (Figure16.7). The basic structure of the gene is similar in organization to that of other serine proteases, such as protein C and coagula­tion factors VII and X, and it is likely that they all originated in the distant past from a common ancestral gene by duplica­tion. Factor IX mRNA comprises 2.8 kb and encodes a mature protein of 415 amino acids. This is made up of a glu­tamic acid- rich sequence (Gla domain) and two epidermal growth factor (EGF)- like domains separated from the serine protease domain by an activation region.
Exons 1 and 2 encode the signal and pro- peptides necessary for transport into the endoplasmic reticulum and post- translational modification. Exons 2 and 3 encode the Gla domain, which contains 12 glutamic acid residues that undergo post- translational γ- carboxylation, which is neces­sary for binding of calcium. Once calcium is bound the Gla domain can dock the protein onto negatively charged phos­pholipid surfaces, which is necessary for catalytic function. Exons 4 and 5 encode the EGF domains which are involved in factor VIII binding. Exon 6 encodes the activation peptide that is cleaved off during the activation of factor IX by either factor XI or a complex of tissue factor and factor VII. Exons 7 and 8 encode the catalytic regions of factor IX, which are responsible for the subsequent activation of factor X in the coagulation cascade. The gene is controlled by a promoter.
The F9 gene, cloned in 1982, is considerably smaller than F8. The first defects identified in hemophilia B were gross deletions, detected by Southern blotting. The EAHAD factor IX database lists 1244 unique variants (https://f9­org accessed in June 2023). Large gene insertion- deletions account for 6% of all cases of hemophilia B with 32 unique variants listed (Figure16.8).
There are 670 unique missense variants listed and 94non­sense. In contrast to missense F8 variants causing non- severe hemophilia A, inhibitor formation in non- severe hemophilia B is unheard of. The likely explanation is that factor IX shares epitopes with other serine proteases which have a similar quaternary structure. Our immune system is therefore less likely to consider epitopes on exogenous factor IX protein as foreign. Factor VIII, on the other hand, is not part of a
db.eahad.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
222 Molecular Hematology
0
Removal of signal peptide
Phospholipid binding FVIIIa binding
10 20 30 40 kb
Gene
https://t.me/med1917
1234 56 78
Exon
F9
1
Signal
Removal of pro-peptide
Removal of activation peptide
Figure16.7 Translation of the F9 gene into the FIX protein. Derivation of activated FIX from the F9 gene. The top panel shows the F9 gene with exons colored according to the domains that are translated from them. Exon numbers are given above the gene. The primary translated product is the FIX precursor. Start and end amino acid numbers for each domain are shown. Removal of the signal peptide generates the FIX procofactor. The pro- peptide directs γ- carboxylation of glutamic acid residues in the Gla domain. Removal of the pro- peptide produces the mature protein that circulates in plasma. Cleavage by FXIa after Arg191 and Arg226 removes the activation peptide leaving the active protease.
protein super family. Thereare some similarities to factor V, but the sequence homology is relatively low. The unusually high frequency of variants at CG dinucleotide sites in hemo­philia B probably reflects the high number of CG dinucleo­tides at critical sites in the F9 gene.
Variants in the promoter region of the F9 gene (e.g. T
at −20 and G → A at −6) are relatively rare and account for
29 47 93 130 192 227
Pro Gla EGF1 EGF2 Catalytic domain
28 46 92 129191 461
γ–carboxylation
Pro Gla EGF1 EGF2 Activation
Gla EGF1 EGF2
Gla EGF1 EGF2
Activation
Activation
Cleavage by Factor XIa
226
factor IX levels in the one- stage activity assay. This variant
FIX Precursor 461 aa
Catalytic domain
FIX Procofactor 433 aa
Catalytic domain
Mature FIX Zymogen 415 aa
FX binding and cleavage
Catalytic domain
Activated FIX (FIXa) 380 aa
is now used in gene therapy for hemophilia B as a way ofachieving the desired factor IX activity with lower doses ofvector.
Full details of the many genetic abnormalities associated
→ A
with hemophilia B can be found at the websites listed at the
end of this chapter. around 2% of all cases. However, they are of particular inter­est as they can give rise to the unique hemophilia B Leyden phenotype, where the factor IX level rises significantly after puberty with loss of the bleeding tendency (Figure 16.9).
Inhibitor formation: etiology andclinical implications
Most of these variants are located in regions that contain binding sequences for liver- enriched transcription factors, which are influenced by androgen levels that rise during puberty.
A gain- of- function F9 variant R338L, F9 Padua (substitu­tion of leucine for arginine at position 338), results in juve­nile thrombophilia rather than hemophilia B. This has been shown to be because the variant molecular activates factor X much faster than wild- type leading to much higher apparent
A proportion of patients with hemophilia will develop allo­immune immunoglobulins directed against infused factor VIII (or IX) CFC. The individual’s immune system perceives the infused, wild- type CFC as “foreign” because it has not been tolerized through exposure to immunogenic epitopes in the exogenous protein. This is potentially very serious, as individuals become refractory to conventional doses of coag­ulation factor concentrates and bleeding can be very difficult
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有