Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_104_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
V617F+
(A)
Wild-type allele
Mutant allele
Wild-type allele
Cycle
https://t.me/med1917
P1
Mutant allele
P1
P2
P2
Myeloproliferative neoplasms 103
V617F+
2
K
JA
G
P3
Water
Normal
Control
Mutant specic
T
(B)
R
R
Figure7.2 Detection of the JAK2V617F mutation. (A) Allele- specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplification with primers P1 and
P3yields a product of 364 bp (control), whereas amplification with primers P1 and P2 yields a 203 bp PCR product from the mutant allele only.
(B)Real- time PCR using a dual- labeled probe specific for the mutant allele. Amplification from the wild- type allele results in displacement but not
destruction ofthe probe, resulting in no release of fluorescence. In contrast, amplification from the mutant allele results in Taq - dependent
destruction of the probe, releasing the reporter (R) whose fluorescence can then be detected.
Q
G
Q
T
Phylogenetic reconstruction of MPN driver mutation
acquisition and evolution has been elegantly performed
by the group of Nangalia and colleagues at Cambridge
P3
R
Q
G
R
Q
T
∆Rm
0.001
0.0001
0.1
0.01
20
22 24 26 28 30
32 34 36 38 40
JAK2
Normal
thrombotic risks to prevent those who develop MPN and
thrombotic complications later in life. Evaluation in clinical
trials would be warranted.
University. Here, using samples from MPN patients, they
delineated the timing of mutation occurrence, clonal selection, and evolution. Phylogenetic trees were established for
each patient by detecting single nucleotide variants (SNV)
across colonies. By definition, each individual had a differing
phylogenetic tree and branching structure, but commonalities were noted. Parallel clonal evolution was identified frequently– i.e. similar genetic changes happening in different
HSC populations. Intriguingly, this analysis revealed that
JAK2 V617F was acquired in utero or early childhood in
some of these individuals with an average latency period to
disease development of 31
years; this was modified by the
presence of other mutations and highly heterogenous rates of
clonal expansion. Of note, the earliest acquisition was only
several weeks following conception. As discussed by the
authors, the key to further understanding and decisions
onintervention may involve a dual approach: early detection
of low allele burden mutant clones and an estimation of
theircompetitive rate of growth. They additionally suggest
that early detection may help guide the management on
Other JAK2 mutations
JAK2 exon12mutations
In general, around 2–3% of patients with annotated PV lack
the JAK2 V617F mutation. JAK2 exon 12 mutations were
first described in 2007in “JAK2 negative polycythemia” and
have not been described in either ET or PMF. Exon 12 codes
for amino acids 505–547 and is located in a “linker region,”
situated between the JAK2 SH2 and JH2 domains. Multiple
mutations have been described in exon 12 leading to
erythrocytosis, spanning a region from residues 536–547
(Figure7.3). The most frequent mutations described from
one comprehensive study of 33 patients from the Mayo clinic
and University of Florence were the H538- K539delins (n= 8;
24%), F537- K539delins (n = 6; 18%), N542- E543delins
(n= 5; 15%), and E543- D544del (n= 5; 15%). Murine models
transduced to express one such human mutation, JAK2-
N542- E543del, displayed increased erythropoiesis, with
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

70 75 80
–1
L
(A)
Kinase Pseudokinase
https://t.me/med1917
104 Molecular Hematology
(B)
0
–5
0
HRM difference plot
Figure7.3 Types and detection of JAK2 exon 12mutations.
(A)Three main types of mutation can be described: lysine to leucine
substitution at codon 539 (shaded); deletion of glutamic acid at codon
543 (shaded); duplication affecting codons 537–546 (underlined).
(B)Detection of JAK2 exon 12mutations by high- resolution melting
analysis. Source: Frequency of mutations taken from Passamonti, F.,
Elena, C., Schnittger, S., etal. (2011). Molecular and clinical features
of the myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with JAK2 exon
12mutations. Blood 117:2813–6.
Normal
K539L
F537-K539delinsL
N542-E543del
E543-D544del
F537-I546dupF547
normal white cell and platelet counts. No increased reticulin
deposition or aberrant megakaryocytopoiesis was evident.
Expression led to increased baseline levels of both phosphoSTAT3 and phosphor- ERk1/2. Of note, these models confirmed evidence of low hepcidin levels together with elevated
Transferrin receptor protein 1 (Tfr1) expression, favoring
redirection of iron to “fuel” erythroid precursors.
Phenotypically, JAK2 exon 12 PV patients tend to be
younger and may have higher Hgb levels than those with
JAK2 V617F mutations, but this is not a consistent finding.
It appears more common to have an isolated erythrocytosis,
lacking a concomitant leukocytosis or thrombocytosis, compared to JAK2 V617F PV. Exon 12 PV cases may lack the
classical PV features on bone marrow trephine evaluation.
Most have evidence of marked erythroid hyperplasia and
small, atypical megakaryocytes tend to be present with a lack
of clustering in comparison to the megakaryocytic atypia
and panmyelosis, most frequently seen with JAK2 V617F
mutated PV. Of particular note, there appears to be no significant difference in thrombosis risk, overall survival, or
risk of myelofibrotic transformation/blast phase evolution
when compared to JAK2 V617F PV.
JAK2 variants and eosinophilia
A novel mutation due to a common 4- AA deletion and
variable 1- AA insertion (Leu583- Ala586DelInsSer/Gln/Pro)
within the JAK2 JH2 domain has been recently described in
four patients with eosinophilia, two of whom had the Leu583Ala586DelInsSer (JAK2ex13InDel), and interestingly met the
criteria for both chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) and PV,
highlighting the degree of phenotypic heterogeneity from
variant JAK2 mutations with a novel PV/CEL MPN.
Germline JAK2 mutations
A number of gain- of- function germline JAK2 mutations,
located predominantly in the kinase or pseudokinase
domains, have been described associated with hereditary
thrombocytosis. For example, the Oxford group reported on
kindred with familial thrombocytosis due to a germline
JAK2 V617I mutation. Functional analysis revealed limited
constitutive activation but markedly reduced threshold for
cytokine- induced activation. Of note, a case of JAK2 FERM
domain variant associated with hereditary thrombocytosis
has also recently been described.
JAK2 germline haplotype
In 2009, three separate groups described an association
between a germline haplotype involving the 3′- section of
JAK2 termed the “GGCC or 46/1 haplotype.” It can be
represented by four main SNPs, (rs1159782, rs3780367,
rs10974944, and rs12343867). This is a low penetrance predisposition allele that maps to chromosome 9p and contains
three genes JAK2, Insulin- like 6 (INSL6), and Insulin- like 4
(INSL4). This 46/1haplotype can associate with some but
not all JAK2 mutated MPN, in particular PV, and also nonJAK2 mutated MPN and was not initially believed to be a
major player in driving particular clinicopathological
characteristics. More recently, Tefferi and colleagues reevaluated the phenotypic and prognostic relevance of the
JAK2 46/1haplotype in 414 annotated Primary MF cases.
The JAK2 46/1 haplotype was present in 69% of included
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

Myeloproliferative neoplasms 105
S505(A)
–1
–2
–3
–4
–5
–6
–7
–8
–9
79.5 80.0 80.5 81.0 81.5 82.0 82.5 83.0 83.5 84.0 84.5 85.0 85.5 86.0 86.5 87.0 87.5 88.0
https://t.me/med1917
Extracellular TM Cytoplasmic
(B)
4
3
HRM difference plot
2
1
0
JM
W515
Normal
W515L
W515A
S505N
W515K
W515R
Figure7.4 Detection of MPL exon 10mutations. (A) The S505 and W515 amino acid residues lie within the transmembrane domain (TM) and
juxtamembrane domain (JM), respectively. (B) Detection of MPL exon 10mutations by high- resolution melting analysis.
patients (44% in a heterozygous state and 25% in a homozygous state). Homozygous JAK2 46/1 haplotype was more
common in JAK2 mutated PMF, whereas heterozygous and
nullizygous states were more common in CALR mutated MF.
There was no significant difference in distribution across
Dynamic IPSS risk groups (a dynamic prognostic score for
primary MF that can be applied at any stage in the disease
course and not just at the time of diagnosis) as determined
by JAK2 46/1 haplotype status. Of particular interest, this
study confirmed the association of nullizygosity for JAK2
46/1 haplotype with inferior overall survival and this was
independent of karyotype and high molecular risk mutations. Links with thrombosis and symptom burden still
require clarification.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
MPL mutations in ET and MF
Mutations in the gene for the TPO receptor, MPL, were first
reported in 2006, and have since been found in 5–10% of
patients with PMF and 1–4% of patients with ET. MPL protein
has three structural domains: an extracellular domain, where
its ligand, TPO, binds; a transmembrane spanning helix; and
an intracellular region composed of a flexible juxtamembrane
region followed by a protein kinase domain and a C- terminal
region. In MPN, the most prominent mutations in MPL cluster in exon 10, affecting the transmembrane and juxtamembrane domains of MPL (Figure 7.4). The most common
mutations are W515L and W515K, but other variants at the
W515 residue have been identified (W515A and W515R).
These mutations result in the substitution of tryptophan for
another amino acid in the transmembrane domain of MPL.
The loss of tryptophan is suggested to decrease the MPL helix
tilt angle relative to the lipid bilayer, bringing the dimer into
active conformation in the absence of ligand binding. The
S505N variant was originally described in hereditary thrombocytosis but has more recently been found as an acquired
mutation in ET and PMF. S505N mutation induces both a
change in receptor conformation and signal activation in the
absence of ligand binding. While mutations of W515 and
S505N operate through different mechanisms, they both result
in TPO receptor activation in the absence of TPO binding,
leading to the MPN phenotype. Whole- exome sequencing has
identified further MPL gain- of- function mutations located

106 Molecular Hematology
https://t.me/med1917
outside of exon 10, including S204F/P and Y591F/N. Many
patients acquire homozygous MPL mutations, but some
patients are found tohave multiple MPL mutations, or MPL
mutation in combination with JAK2 V617F or CALR mutation albeit this is very rare.
MPL mutations can confer cytokine- independent
proliferation in cell lines. Introduction of W515L or W515A
mutations into murine bone marrow was associated
withmarked thrombocytosis, splenomegaly, extramedullary
hematopoiesis, and MF. There was minimal effect on reticulocytes, in keeping with a selective effect on megakaryocyte
precursors and the observation that these mutations are not
associated with PV in humans. Patients with MPL- mutated
MF are more likely to be female, older, with more severe
anemia and more constitutional symptoms than MPLunmutated MF. While patients with MPL- mutated ET tend
to present with higher platelet counts, lower hemoglobin
levels, and lower white cell counts than patients with JAK2
V617F- positive ET. Patients with MPL- mutant ET also have
a higher risk of thrombosis and an increased rate of progression to PET- MF compared to JAK2V617F- positive ET.
CALR mutations in ET and MF
Calreticulin (CALR) is a highly conserved, multifunctional
protein that acts as a molecular chaperone. It normally resides
also shuttle between other cellular compartments. Functionally,
it acts as a “chaperone” for polypeptides to ensure that they are
folded into the correct configuration in the ER prior to transport to the Golgi apparatus for secretion. It also plays an
important functional role in calcium homeostasis.
In 2013, two different groups published on the discovery
of mutations in CALR using massive parallel sequencing in
ET/MF patients lacking a JAK2 or MPL mutation. The most
prevalent mutation is known as a Type 1mutation, characterized by a 529 followed in prevalence by a Type 2 mutation, a 5- bp
TTGTC insertion (p.K385fs*47) in exon 9; together these
account for >80% of all CALR mutations described in MPN
(Figure7.5) All CALR mutations induce a +1 bp frameshift
within the codon- reading frame of the DNA, leading to the
generation of a mutant CALR protein which has a positively
charged C- terminal amino acid sequence; of note Type
1 mutations eliminate all negatively charged amino acids
(AA)in the C- terminus and Type 2 to a lesser extent when
compared to the wild- type protein. More than 50mutations
in CALR have been described to date, most commonly small
insertions or deletions clustered within exon 9 and can be
classified as “Type- 1 like” and “Type- 2 like.” Mutations
induce loss of an ER- retention signal (KDEL motif) and Ca++
binding domain, coupled with structural conformational
base pair (bp) deletion (p.L367fs*46) in exon
changes in the N- domain and altered glycan binding sites,
leading to export of CALR from the ER. Mutant CALR
acquires the ability to bind to the extracellular domain of
MPL in the absence of TPO, a lectin- dependent function is
required, with consequent activation of the MPL- JAK- STAT
signaling axis. Pro- survival and anti- apoptotic pathways are
upregulated.
Compared to JAK2 mutated ET, both Type 1 and 2 CALR
mutations associated with higher platelet counts, lower white
cell counts, and lower hemoglobin. A comparative analysis
has been retrospectively performed to delineate if any
differences exist dependent on type of mutation in ET. Type
2mutation associated with higher platelet count and younger
age, and Type 1 with male sex. In MF, in general, CALR
mutations are associated with a more indolent phenotype,
most commonly in younger males, with less thrombotic
riskand better overall survival when comparing those with
Type 1 CALR mutant MF to those who have JAK2 or MPL
mutated MF. More recent MF prognostic scoring systems
incorporating molecular annotation, such as the MutationEnhanced International Prognostic Scoring System 70+ v2.0
(MIPSS70v.2.0), MYSEC- PM, and the individualized sanger
prognostic calculator incorporate CALR mutation status,
alongside other clinicopathological findings, as a prognostic
factor. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting mutant CALR
MPN include neoepitope- directed monoclonal antibodies
and vaccinations are undergoing evaluation as potential
future therapeutic strategies.
Other somatic mutations in ET,
MF,and PV
Additional somatic mutations may be found both in those
with driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL and those
without (so- called “triple- negative” MPN), with around
30–40% of patients harboring additional somatic mutations.
Of note, studies have observed that MPN has an overall lower
burden of somatic mutations (∼0.2 somatic mutations per
Mb) compared with other hematological malignancies (e.g.
0.37mutations per Mb for AML and ∼1mutation per Mb for
multiple myeloma). An increased number of “nonmutations is associated with older age, and more advanced
disease, with ET and PV patients having fewer mutations on
average that those with MF. Most often, the implicated genes
affect hematopoietic stem cell differentiation and proliferation, and unsurprisingly are also seen in other myeloid malignancies and in those with CHIP, with ASXL1, DNMT3A,
and TET2 being the three most commonly mutated genes.
Mutations in genes involved in DNA methylation such as
DNMT3A (a methyltransferase), TET2, and IDH1/2 (encoding proteins involved in demethylation) may promote or
inhibit HSC differentiation dependent on context. Monoallelic
driver”
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

Myeloproliferative neoplasms 107
c.1154_1155insTTGTC
ype allele
50 75 100 125 150 175 200
(A)
(B)
https://t.me/med1917
p.K385fs*47 (Type 2)
N domain
P domain
50 75 100 125
Size (nt)
C domain
Normal
150 175 200
c.1092_1143del
(Type 1)
KDEL
c.1092_1143del
p.L367fs*46 (Type 1)
50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Figure7.5 Detection of CALR exon 9mutations.
(A) CALR mutations lie within the C- terminal
portion of the CALR protein. (B) Detection of CALR
exon 9mutations by fluorescent polymerase chain
reaction followed by high- resolution capillary
electrophoresis.
or biallelic DNMT3a mutations are found in between 7% and
10% of MPN patients and between 7% and 20% of MPN
patients display mutations in TET2, with a higher incidence
in advanced phase disease. IDH1/2 mutation “KI” mice models showed higher HSC proliferation, anemia, and extramedullary disease. Mutations such as ASXL1 and IDH1/2 in MF
associate with worse outcomes, including shorter OS and
increased rates of progression to blast- phase disease.
Mutations in spliceosome components SRSF2, U2AF1,
SF3B1, and ZRSR2 are also more commonly observed in MF
and in MDS/MPN crossover syndromes, with dysplastic
changes seen on marrow morphology, including the ring
c.1154_1155insTTGTC
(Type 2)
Wild-t
Mutant allele
sideroblasts typically associated with the SF3B1 mutation,
than in PV or ET where they are relatively rare. These mutations also confer a reduced OS in MPN and increased risk of
AML evolution. Cell signaling genes affecting the RAS pathway (NRAS and SETBP1) and STAT 5 signaling (CBL) are
associated with reduced OS, increased proliferation and may
confer resistance to JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib as highlighted above. Genes affecting transcription and tumor suppression (e.g. TP53, RUNX 1, NF1, and NFE2) are associated
with an increased risk of progression to AML from chronic
phase disease and reduce survival in the blast phase. The presence of a low VAF TP53 mutation is common in thechronic
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

108 Molecular Hematology
https://t.me/med1917
phase of MPN; however, loss of heterozygosity ofthe wildtype allele through chromosomal deletion or uniparental disomy results in a rapidly expanding clone, which drives disease
progression and leukemic transformation. Blast phase disease
in this context is associated with a dismal prognosis.
Dynamic Clonal assessment (i.e. following the mutational
profile over time) has shown that some mutations, e.g. TET2,
as well as SF3B1 and DNMT3A more often precede acquisition of a JAK2 V617F mutation. These mutations are associated with clonal hematopoiesis, suggesting an “asymptomatic
antecedent clone” predisposing to the MPN. These can be
seen in the same colony expressing the JAK2 mutation (suggesting linear clonal evolution) or less commonly in a separate clone (suggesting biclonality). Mutations in ASXL1,
EZH2, can occur before, contemporaneously or after, JAK2
mutations and IDH1 mutations are normally acquired after
JAK2 V617F. CALR mutation is generally the earliest
acquired in CALR- mutated MPN. Of interest, the order in
which mutations are acquired in MPN may in fact correlate
with clinical phenotype and possibly also response to treatment. In the example of concurrent TET2 and JAK2 mutation, as compared with patients in whom the TET2 mutation
was acquired first, patients who acquired the JAK2 V617F
mutation before TET2 mutations are often younger, have a
greater likelihood of presenting with PV than with ET, an
increased risk of thrombosis, and an increased sensitivity of
JAK2- mutant progenitors to ruxolitinib in vitro. When a
DNMT3A or TET2 mutation is acquired prior to JAK2
V617F, this associates with an ET phenotype.
Reticulin deposition in MPN
The presence/grade of reticulin deposition, or indeed its
absence, are key components of the WHO diagnostic criteriaof
MPNs. The WHO fibrosis grading system uses four grades
(MF 0–3), although there can clearly be heterogeneous reticulin deposition. Primary MF requires characteristic megakaryocyte atypia or proliferation, accompanied by reticulin grade
2/3 and or collagen fibrosis, as a major requirement. The etiology of increasing reticulin deposition is complex and reliant
on MPN-
associated hypercytokinemia, including PDGF and
transforming growth factor (TGF) beta, and a disrupted
HSC– mesenchymal stem cell– stromal microenvironment
niche. The effects of novel agents on the grade and extent of
reticulin deposition are under much review.
Chronic neutrophilic leukemia
CNL is a rare, often aggressive MPN defined by persistent
mature neutrophilic leukocytosis, bone marrow granulocyte
hyperplasia, and frequent hepatosplenomegaly (Table7.3). A
seminal study published in 2013 described mutations in
colony- stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) mutation as
Table7.3 Diagnostic criteria forCNL
CNL WHO 2022 diagnostic criteria
1. PB WBC ≥25 × 109/L
Segmented neutrophils plus band forms ≥80% of WBCs
Neutrophil precursors (promyelocytes, myelocytes, and
metamyelocytes) <10% of WBC
Myeloblasts rarely observed
Monocyte count <1 × 109/L
No dysgranulopoiesis
2. Hypercellular BM
Neutrophil granulocytes increased in percentage and number
Neutrophil maturation appears normal
Myeloblasts <5% of nucleated cells
3. Not meeting WHO criteria for BCR- ABL1+ CML, PV, ET, or
PMF
4. No rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1, or
PCM1- JAK2
5. Presence of CSF3R T618I or other activating CSF3R mutation
or
In the absence of a CSFR3R mutation, persistent neutrophilia
(at least 3mo), splenomegaly, and no identifiable cause of
reactive neutrophilia, including the absence of a plasma cell
neoplasm or, if present, demonstration of clonality of myeloid
cells by cytogenetic or molecular studies.
WHO 2022 diagnostic criteria for CNL.
the oncogenic driver mutation in 89% of a cohort of CNL
patients. This provided fresh insights into the molecular
pathogenesis of CNL and led to the addition of molecular
annotation to the WHO diagnostic criteria of CNL. This
requires an absence of platelet- derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha, PDGFR beta, or FGFR1, or PCM1- JAK2
rearrangements and WHO criteria for BCR- ABL1
+
CML, PV,
ET, or PMF and the presence of CSF3R T618I or other activating CSF3R mutation. Patients not meeting these criteria
must exhibit specific clinical features and markers of clonality in order to attain the diagnosis.
CSF3R is involved in mitotic and maturation signaling,
and regulates proliferation through downstream pathways
involving JAK, STAT, RAS/RAF/MAP, SYK PI3K/Akt, and
SRC kinases. The most common CSF3R mutations (in
around 75%) are point mutations in T618I and T615a. These
membrane- proximal mutations prevent o- glycosylation of
the CSF3 receptor causing increased dimeric configuration,
leading to ligand- independent receptor activation, and constitutive downstream signaling through JAK2. Such cases
of CNL may display sensitivity to treatments with JAK2
inhibitors such as ruxolitinib. Frameshift or nonsense mutations leading to premature truncation of the cytoplasmic
tailof CSF3R (D771fs, S783 fs, Y752X, and W791Z) are also
seen (in around 25%), largely as compound mutations with
membrane proximal or transmembrane CSF3R mutations.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

Myeloproliferative neoplasms 109
https://t.me/med1917
Receptor truncation mutations cause a loss of inhibitory
regulatory mechanisms, including receptor internalization,
and downregulation of binding sites for SOCS3, which targets the receptor for degradation. The relative scarcity of
truncation only CSF3R mutations in CNL suggests that they,
in isolation, are unlikely to be sufficient to cause CNL, and
this theory has been supported in KI murine models.
Truncation mutations may be resistant to JAK2 inhibition
but are often sensitive to inhibition with the SRC kinase
inhibitor dasatinib. Of note, ∼10–20% of CNL cases are negative for CSF3R T618I and other membrane- proximal mutations, suggesting that additional genetic lesions contribute to
the leukemic phenotype in CNL.
The most common concurrent mutations found in CNL
are ASXL1, SETBP1, SRSF2, TET2, and EZH2. Mutations in
both JAK2 and CALR have also having been reported.
SETBP1 mutation is seen most commonly in association
with CSF3R mutations, when it promotes hematopoietic
cell expansion through the upregulation of Myc- associated
gene expression programs, promoting self- renewal of
CSF3R- mutated hematopoietic progenitors and preventing
terminal differentiation. The involvement of mutations also
implicated in clonal hematopoiesis suggests CHIP may
function as a possible backdrop to the later development of
a CSF3R mutation. In this regard, studies have suggested
that EZH2, SETBP1, TET2, U2AF1, and SF3B1 appear to be
early mutations, while ASXL1, SRSF2, CSF3R, CBL, and
NRAS, display a wider range of allelic frequencies and
occur irregularly either in the founder clone or in later
sub- clones.
Chronic eosinophilic leukemia andother
eosinophilic disorders
Chronic eosinophilia leukemia (CEL), myeloid or lymphoid
neoplasms associated with eosinophilia and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome are rare diagnoses, which require
careful exclusion of reactive causes of eosinophilia, and evaluation of clonality (Table7.4). In recognition of the growing
list of recurrent, molecularly-
defined primary eosinophilias
resulting from fusion tyrosine kinase genes, the major category “Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and
rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 or with
PCM1- JAK2” (MLN- Eo) has been defined, with the latter
fusion, PCM1- JAK2, added as a provisional entity in the
2016WHO categorization.
The FIP1L1- PDGFRA fusion gene occurs as a result of
cytogenetically occult 800- kb deletion on 4q12, which can be
detected by reverse transcription (RT)- PCR or fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) with a probe for the CHIC2
gene, which is located in the deleted segment. This fusion
gene in association with an MPN with prominent eosinophilia is sufficient to diagnose “MPN with eosinophilia
Table7.4 CEL NOS
CEL NOS WHO 2017 diagnostic criteria
1. PB Eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 109/L
2. Absence of BCR- ABL1, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1
rearrangements and PCM1- JAK2, ETV6- JAK2, or BCR- JAK2
3. Not meeting criteria for CML, aCML, PV, ET, PMF, CNL,
CMML, or AML
4. Myeloblasts >2% peripheral blood or 5–19% in the bone
marrow
or
5. Presence of clonal cytogenetic abnormality, including trisomy 8,
(10;11)(p14;q21), and t(7;12)(q11;p11)
associated with FIP1L1- PDGFRA.” It is the most commonly
identified genetic aberration in CEL and is often associated
with increased peripheral blood mast cell tryptase levels,
with increased numbers of loosely clustered mast cells in the
marrow, in contrast to systemic mastocytosis, which is characterized by dense mast cell aggregates, and classically the
cKIT D816V mutation.
Fusion genes involving PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1
aretypical of clonal eosinophilia, and are often identified
onkaryotyping, with the specific fusion partner gene being
confirmed with FISH. In contrast to patients with the
FIP1L1-
PDGFRA fusion, those with PDGFRB or FGFR1
rearrangements can present without eosinophilia. Rarely,
PDGFRB rearrangements are cytogenetically cryptic but
can be detected by RT- PCR or RNAseq analysis. PDGFRB
rearrangement is rare (<1%) but important if identified,
given itsresponsiveness to imatinib, with the potential to
achieve complete molecular remissions in such patients.
CEL with FGFR1 rearrangement follows an aggressive
course usually terminating in AML or T- acute lymphoblastic leukemia within 1–2 years. Imatinib is considered a
definitive treatment for PDGFRA/B- re- arranged neoplasms
with eosinophilia. Patients lacking evidence of the fusion
genes mentioned above may attract a diagnosis of CELNOS, which requires molecular and/or morphological evidence of an eosinophilic myeloid malignancy, and a clonal
cytogenetic or molecular marker, or >2% blasts in blood or
>5% blasts in bone marrow.
Integration ofmolecular information
into diagnostic algorithms
andprognostication
Increasing integration of MPN molecular annotation into both
diagnostic algorithms and prognostic scores has occurred as
our knowledge of the molecular landscape has expanded over
the last two decades. By way of example, this can be observed in
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

110 Molecular Hematology
https://t.me/med1917
the WHO and BSH MF, ET, and PV simplified diagnostic criteria (Tables7.1 and7.2, respectively), where molecular information makes the diagnostic criteria much more straightforward
for practicing clinicians. Another good example is the heterogenous etiology of clonal eosinophilia, where increasing
delineation of causative fusion genes facilitates much easier
classification and ultimately therapeutic approaches, e.g.
imatinib therapy for PDGFRA/B re- arranged neoplasms with
eosinophilia. Multiple prognostic scores exist across the MPN
spectrum, in particular for MF, and increasingly integrate
molecular details to refine prognostication. Both the MutationEnhanced International Prognostic Scoring System 70
(MIPSS70) and MIPSS70 + v2.0 integrate clinicopathological,
hematological, cytogenetic, and molecular information into
one comprehensive score. MIPSS70 + V2.0incorporates not
only the presence or absence of so- called high molecular risk
(HMR) mutations (pathogenetic mutations in ASXL1, EZH2,
SRSF2, IDH1/2, and U2AF1) but also takes into account the
number. The MYSEC- PM score, for post PV- and post ET- MF,
incorporates non- CALR mutation driver status alongside
blast %, age, hemoglobin, platelets, and presence or absence of
constitutional status. For ET, the international prognostic
score of thrombosis in WHO- defined ET (IPSET- thrombosis)
model incorporates JAK2 V617F mutation (associated with a
higher risk of thrombosis) as one of the prognostic risk factors. The personalized prognosis calculator for MPN patients
(https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/mpn- multistage), was derived
from PV, ET, and MF patient information and integrates 63
variables: demographic, clinicopathological, cytogenetic, and
molecular information and allows for personalized outcome
prediction. This can predict not only survival but also estimate
the risk of blast phase transformation.
Conclusions
Molecular annotation across the MPN spectrum has led to
clinically useful classification and diagnostic algorithms, led to
rationale diagnostic approaches dependent on phenotype, frequently imparts relevant prognostic information, and has
increased our ability to personalize therapeutic approaches for
some. Increased understanding of the complex proand anti- apoptotic pathways underlying MPN initiation and
propagation has led to the development of many novel agents
targeting these pathways. The development of JAK inhibitors
revolutionized the treatment pathway of MF. Ruxolitinib
was the first approved JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor following the
pivotal results from the two large international phase III
trials COMFORT- 1 and COMFORT- 2. Since then, we have
observed approval of both fedratinib pacritinib and momelotinib (in the United States) for MF and will hopefully soon see
the availability of momelotinib elsewhere globally. Other agents
in development for MF include BET inhibitors (Pelabresib) and
survival
BCL- 2inhibitors (navitoclax), either used as monotherapy or
in combination with a JAK inhibitor. More information on how
the molecular landscape determines response to these new
agents paralleled with how these agents may modify, at least in
part, aspects of the mutational profile is required.
One of the major remaining challenges in MPN management
is accurately predicting transformation events– either when ET
or PV transforms to post- ET MF and post- PV MF, respectively,
or when chronic phase disease moves into accelerated or blast
phase disease. Disparate clinicopathological and molecular features can aid prediction only in part and the unknown risks
induce significant anxiety in both clinicians and patients. A
clear predictive signal is lacking– this is a current focus in global
MPN translational studies and most likely future modeling
should incorporate not only clinical and genomic factors but in
addition immunological and proteomic characteristics to accurately model disease trajectories and highlight the best timing
and choice of therapeutic intervention.
Further reading
Introduction
James, C., Ugo, V., Le Couédic, J.P. et al. (2005). A unique clonal
JAK2mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 434 (7037): 1144–1148.
Kralovics, R., Passamonti, F., Buser, A.S. et al. (2005). A gain-
function mutation of JAK2in myeloproliferative disorders. N. Engl. J.
Med. 352 (17): 1779–1790.
Levine, R.L., Wadleigh, M., Cools, J. etal. (2005). Activating mutation
in the tyrosine kinase JAK2in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell 7
(4): 387–397.
Michiels, J.J., Berneman, Z., Schroyens, W. etal. (2015). Changing con-
cepts of diagnostic criteria of myeloproliferative disorders and the
molecular etiology and classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms: from Dameshek 1950 to Vainchenker 2005 and beyond. Acta
Haematol. 133 (1): 36–51.
The JAK2 V617F mutation in Philadelphianegative MPNs
Cross, N.C.P., Godfrey, A.L., and Cargo, C. (2021). A British Society
for Haematology good practice paper. The use of genetic tests to
diagnose and manage patients with myeloproliferative and
myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic neoplasms, and related disorders.
Br. J. Haematol. 195 (3): 338–351.
Harrison, C.N., Butt, N., Campbell, P. etal. (2014). Modification of
British Committee for Standards in Haematology diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 167 (3):
421–423.
Khoury, J.D., Solary, E., Abla, O. etal. (2022). The 5th edition of the
World Health Organization classification of Haematolymphoid
Tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia 36
(7): 1703–1719.
of-
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

Myeloproliferative neoplasms 111
https://t.me/med1917
McMullin, M.F., Harrison, C.N., Ali, S. etal. (2019). A guideline for
the diagnosis and management of polycythaemia vera. A British
Society for Haematology guideline. Br. J. Haematol. 184 (2):
176–191.
Reilly, J.T., McMullin, M.F., Beer, P.A. et al. (2012). Guideline for the
diagnosis and management of myelofibrosis. Br. J. Haematol. 158 (4):
453–471.
JAK2 exon12mutations
Lakey, M.A., Pardanani, A., Hoyer, J.D. etal. (2010). Bone marrow mor-
phologic features in polycythemia Vera with JAK2 exon 12mutations. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 133 (6): 942–948.
JAK2 variants and eosinophilia
Patel, A.B., Franzini, A., Leroy, E. etal. (2019). JAK2 ex13InDel drives
oncogenic transformation and is associated with chronic eosinophilic leukemia and polycythemia vera. Blood 134 (26): 2388–2398.
Germline JAK2 mutations
Mead, A.J., Rugless, M., Woll, P. etal. (2011). Germline activating JAK2
V617I mutation in a family with hereditary thrombocytosis. Blood
118 (21): 1738–1738.
JAK2 germline haplotype
Anelli, L., Zagaria, A., Specchia, G. et al. (2018). The JAK2 GGCC
(46/1) haplotype in myeloproliferative neoplasms: causal or random?
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (4): 1152.
Tefferi, A., Lasho, T.L., Mudireddy, M. etal. (2019). The germline JAK2
GGCC (46/1) haplotype and survival among 414 molecularlyannotated patients with primary myelofibrosis. Am. J. Hematol. 94
(3): 299–305.
Vannucchi, A.M. and Guglielmelli, P. (2019). The JAK2 46/1 ( GGCC )
MPN-
predisposing haplotype: a risky haplotype, after all. Am. J.
Hematol. 94 (3): 283–285.
MPL mutations in ET and MF
Alshemmari, S.H., Rajan, R., and Emadi, A. (2016). Molecular
pathogenesis and clinical significance of driver mutations in primary
myelofibrosis: a review. Med. Princ. Pract. Int. J. Kuwait Univ. Health
Sci. Cent. 25 (6): 501–509.
Guglielmelli, P. and Calabresi, L. (2021). The MPL mutation. Int. Rev.
Cell Mol. Biol. 365: 163–178.
CALR mutations in ET and MF
Araki, M. and Komatsu, N. (2020). The role of calreticulin mutations in
myeloproliferative neoplasms. Int. J. Hematol. 111 (2): 200–205.
Holmström, M.O., Riley, C.H., Svane, I.M. etal. (2016). The CALR exon
9 mutations are shared neoantigens in patients with CALR mutant
chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia 30 (12): 2413–2416.
Klampfl, T., Gisslinger, H., Harutyunyan, A.S. et al. (2013). Somatic
mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N. Engl. J.
Med. 369 (25): 2379–2390.
Nangalia, J., Massie, C.E., Baxter, E.J. etal. (2013). Somatic CALR muta-
tions in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N.
Engl. J. Med. 369 (25): 2391–2405.
Tefferi, A., Lasho, T.L., Finke, C.M. et al. (2014). CALR vs JAK2 vs
MPL-
mutated or triple- negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic
and molecular comparisons. Leukemia 28 (7): 1472–1477.
Other somatic mutations in ET, ET, and ET
Delic, S., Rose, D., Kern, W. etal. (2016). Application of an NGS- based
28-
gene panel in myeloproliferative neoplasms reveals distinct mutation patterns in essential thrombocythaemia, primary myelofibrosis
and polycythaemia vera. Br. J. Haematol. 175 (3): 419–426.
Giai, V., Secreto, C., Freilone, R. et al. (2021). Philadelphia-
MPN: A molecular journey, from hematopoietic stem cell to clinical
features. Medicina (Mex). 57 (10): 1043.
Lundberg, P., Karow, A., Nienhold, R. etal. (2014). Clonal evolution and
clinical correlates of somatic mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 123 (14): 2220–2228.
Ortmann, C.A., Kent, D.G., Nangalia, J. etal. (2015). Effect of mutation order
on myeloproliferative neoplasms. N. Engl. J. Med. 372 (7): 601–612.
negative
Chronic neutrophilic leukemia
Carratt, S.A., Kong, G.L., Curtiss, B.M. etal. (2022). Mutated SETBP1
activates transcription of Myc programs to accelerate CSF3R - driven
myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 140 (6): 644–658.
Drexler, H.G., Nagel, S., and Quentmeier, H. (2021). Leukemia cell
lines: invitro models for the study of chronic neutrophilic leukemia.
Curr. Oncol. 28 (3): 1790–1794.
Szuber, N., Elliott, M., and Tefferi, A. (2020). Chronic neutrophilic leu-
kemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, molecular genetics, prognosis, and
management. Am. J. Hematol. 95 (2): 212–224.
Chronic eosinophilic leukemia andother
eosinophilic disorders
Morsia, E., Reichard, K., Pardanani, A. et al. (2020). WHO defined
chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS):
a contemporary series from the Mayo Clinic. Am. J. Hematol. 95 (7):
E172–E174.
Integration ofmolecular information into
diagnostic algorithms andprognostication
Grinfeld, J., Nangalia, J., Baxter, E.J. etal. (2018). Classification and per-
sonalized prognosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N. Engl. J. Med.
379 (15): 1416–1430.
Guglielmelli, P., Lasho, T.L., Rotunno, G. etal. (2018). MIPSS70: mutation-
enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation- age
patients with primary myelofibrosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 36 (4): 310–318.
Passamonti, F., Mora, B., and Barraco, D. (2018). Post- ET and post- PV
myelofibrosis: updates on a distinct prognosis from primary myelofibrosis. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 13 (3): 173–182.
Tefferi, A., Guglielmelli, P., Lasho, T.L. etal. (2018). MIPSS70+ version
2.0: mutation and karyotype- enhanced international prognostic
scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am.
Soc. Clin. Oncol. 36 (17): 1769–1770.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有

本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
https://t.me/med1917
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
