Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_103_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
468
ab
N. Bothra and S. Rath
Fig. 34.4 A clinical photograph showing an inamed swelling on the lower eyelid extending lateral to the lacri­mal sac position with a pus point along with corneal scar-
a
c
e
ring and exotropia (Panel A). The 3D CT-DCG scan demonstrates a minimally superiorly displaced sac on the right side with a postero-lateral sacdiverticulum (Panel B)
b
d
Fig. 34.5 The clinical photograph demonstrates telecan­thus on the right side (Panel A) and normal lower and upper puncta (Panels B and C). The 3D CT-DCG and maximum intensity projection sequence demonstrate a
canalicular obstruction involving the upper and lower canaliculus on the right sideand a patent lacrimal drain­age system on the left side (Panels D and E)
ab
34 Computed Tomography: Dacryocystography
469
c
d
e
Fig. 34.6 The 3D CT-DCG scans demonstrated a dilated sac on the right side and an inferiorly brosed sac on the left side, in the lacrimal sac fossa (Panels A, B, C, and D),
and the maximum intensity projection sequence showeda bilateral incomplete, inferior osteotomy indicative of a previous surgery (Panel E)
470
N. Bothra and S. Rath
Patient 6
A 48-year-old female had undergone bilateral endonasal endoscopic DCR elsewhere 3 years ago. A month after surgery, she had watering and discharge from both eyes. Endoscopic examination revealed complete scarring anterior to the middle turbinate in the sac-duct junction (inferior scarring). The CT-DCG scans showed a dilated sac on the side and a comparatively shrunken sac on the left side with an underlying incomplete bony osteotomy (Fig.34.6).
Inference: During the revision DCR surgery, the osteotomy should be enlarged (Right eye more than Left eye) to open the sac completely into the nasal cavity. It also identies that the fail­ure of the previous surgery was due to inadequate osteotomy, which was mainly inferior. The area opposite the common canaliculus was still cov­ered with bone and could likely cause failure.
34.6 Conclusion
Dacryocystography can be an adjunct to diagnos­ing and managing complex and complicated cases. It cannot be used as a single modality to understand the case scenarios. It has to be com­bined with a proper history, clinical examination, and other corroborative tests. Also, it provides a clear picture and helps make appropriate deci­sions on further management.
Funding Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation.
Disclosure Receives royalties from Springer for his trea-
tise The textbook Surgery in Thyroid Eye Disease: A Conceptual Approach.
References
1. Singh S, Ali MJ, Paulsen F.Dacryocystography: from theory to current practice. Ann Anat. 2019;224:33–40.
2. Ewing AE.Roentgen ray demonstrations of the lacri­mal abscess cavity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1909;26:1–4.
3. Zinreich SI, Miller NR, Freeman LN, et al. Tomographic dacryocystography using topical con­trast media for lacrimal system visualization. Orbit. 1990;9:79–87.
4. Goldberg RA, Heinz GW, Chiu L.Gadolinium MR imaging dacryocystogra-phy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;15:738–41.
5. Munk PL, Burhenne LW, Buffam FV, et al. Dacryocystography: comparison of water­soluble and oil-based contrast agents. Radiology. 1989;173:827–30.
6. Manseld DC, Zeki SM, Mackenzie JR.Case report: extravasation of lipiodol—a complication of dacryo­cystography. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:217–8.
7. Delaney Y, Khooshabeh R.Lipogranuloma following traumatic dacryocystography in a 4-year-old boy. Eye (Lond). 2001;15:683–4.
8. Priebe M, Mohr A, Brossman J, etal. Gadobutrol: an alternative contrast agent for digital subtraction dac­ryocystography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:208386.
Home Care
andTeleophthalmology
TaraprasadDas , DebananadaPadhy , KalpaNegiloni , JenilSheth , SanilJospeph , SuryasnataRath , andRameshKekunnaya
35
35.1 Introduction
Family medicine comprises comprehensive health care for people and their families and pro­vides continuing health care to everyone across all ages, genders, and diseases [1]. Although fam-
T. Das (*) Anant Bajaj Retina Institute, Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreoretinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India e-mail: tpd@lvpei.org
D. Padhy Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye Care, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
K. Negiloni Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India
J. Sheth Shantilal Shanghvi Eye Institute, Mumbai, India
S. Jospeph Lions Aravind Institute of Community Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
S. Rath Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India e-mail: suryasnata@lvpei.org
R. Kekunnaya Child Sight Institute, Jasti V Ramanamma Children’s Eye Care Center, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India e-mail: rameshak@lvpei.org
ily medicine has been an age-old practice glob­ally and in India, it has slowly given way to specialist medical care. While it is not practiced as much in eye care as it is for systemic care, even in the latter, it is decreasing. Despite its dwin­dling popularity, one of the key advantages of family medicine is last-mile access, especially to vulnerable individuals, due to their age, sickness, and/or mobility constraints.
Home care emerged as an acute need during
the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, forcing people to stay indoors for several months. As a result, vari­ous technologies for keeping patients safe and healthy emerged. Tools that enabled home care and were a matter of convenience and compli­ance at one point have now become a critical need. Moreover, home care has become essential, with the WHO reafrming the criticality of pri­oritizing primary health care to ensure that peo­ple receive comprehensive promotive, preventive, curative, rehabilitative, and palliative care as close to their everyday environments as possible [2, 3]. However, to be acceptable, home care must be technologically safe, scientically sound, socially acceptable, easily accessible, and nan­cially affordable.
Eye disease and visual impairment are fre-
quently seen in older adults. Although ophthal­mic pathology is rarely life-threatening, the consequences of visual impairment are wide­ranging. Visual impairment may be associated with social and functional decline, depression,
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 T. Das, P. Satgunam (eds.), Ophthalmic Diagnostics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0138-4_35
471
472
Table 35.1 Teleophthalmology methods
Modality Parameters Description Store and forward Process Patient information, such as medical images, is acquired and sent to
the specialist as needed.
Advantage Medical practitioners need not meet the patient in person.
It saves time and is convenient for the physician.
Disadvantage Given that it relies on history and documented information or images
rather than a physical examination, it has the potential for misdiagnosis.
Remote monitoring (self-testing)
Real-time interactive asynchronous
Real-time interactive synchronous
Process Remote monitoring uses various technological devices to remotely
monitor a patient's health and clinical signs.
Advantage It is cost-effective; hence, more frequent monitoring is possible, and
there is greater patient satisfaction.
Disadvantage Given that it is patient-dependent, the tests conducted by the patients
may not always be accurate.
Process It utilizes several different media, including phones, online
consultations, and home visits by technicians of the eld team.
Advantage A video/audio interaction between the patient and physician occurs
after the eld team has visited the individual’s home, either on the
same or another day. Disadvantage Relatively expensive and time-consuming. Process While it is similar to the asynchronous modality, the main difference
is the live consultation by an ophthalmologist/an eye care personnel. Advantage A real-time video/audio interaction between the patient and
physician occurs immediately after the eld team completes the eye
examination. Disadvantage Relatively expensive and time-consuming; logistic challenge of
coordinating the video call at the time of the home visit. Needs a
reliable network connection.
T. Das et al.
falls, and increased mortality. These could be partly met with telemedicine and home care. Telemedicine is an exchange of medical data by electronic telecommunication technology that allows a remotely located physician to evaluate and monitor the patient’s medical problems. Ophthalmology being highly visual and image intensive is uniquely suited for tele­medicine. There are three main types of tele­medicine: (1) store-and-forward, (2) remote monitoring, and (3) real-time synchronous and asynchronous interactive services. Each one has its advantages and disadvantages. (Table35.1).
This chapter describes the ophthalmic devices and technology of home eye care and teleoph­thalmology. Table35.2 lists the eight eye exami­nations for which teleconsultation and home care are available for adults.
Table 35.2 Eight eye examinations
Sr. No. Parameter Device 1 Visual acuity Web-based/smartphone-
based (PEEK)
2 Refraction Folding Phoropter,
autoref (e-see; InstaRef)
3 Intraocular
pressure
4 External eye Pocket ashlight 5 Visual eld Head-mounted device,
6 Anterior
segment
7 Pupil Pupillometer 8 Fundus Direct and indirect
Rebound tonometer, modular slit lamp with applanation
virtual reality-based perimetry
Modular slit lamp, an anterior imaging system (Grabi ™)
ophthalmoscopy, non-mydriatic fundus camera
35 Home Care andTeleophthalmology
473
35.2 Visual Acuity
Visual acuity (VA) is essential for assessing a patient’s eye health. It is conventionally measured using a printed Snellen or ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart placed at a 6-m (20ft) distance under a standard illumination of 300 lux. With the introduction of digital charts, the distance for visual acuity mea­surement is now reduced to 3–4m. Historically, while VA testing has been done exclusively in a clinical setting under the guidance of a trained professional, in recent years, various options have been created for testing VA outside of the clinic, using web-based (e.g., www.smart-optometry.
com) or smartphone-based (e.g., PEEK; https:// peakvision.org) tests. These devices are validated
against the standard visual acuity charts [4].
35.2.1 PEEK is one ofthepopular VA
measurement devices. (Fig.35.1)
Technology: It is a smartphone-based vision check app that allows anyone to check VA using an Android smartphone. The advantages of PEEK include a visual representation of results for easy
explanation to patients, and it provides standard units of Snellen acuity.
Technique: A “Tumbling E” is used in PEEK.Only the letter “E” appears on the smart­phone, but it has a different orientation each time it appears. Once this has been explained to the patient, the smartphone is held at a distance of 1m. One eye is examined at a time, with the other eye covered.
Clinical Application: PEEK helps screen and identify people who need further examination. It is not intended to replace detailed examinations from a qualied eye health professional.
35.3 Refraction
The global burden of uncorrected refractive error is high. Refraction is the rst essential step in the correction of refractive error. The patient can be refracted at home by traditional retinoscopy using a streak retinoscope, followed by a subjec­tive correction with a series of trial lenses. While ideal, this requires an elaborate setup, including a skilled workforce. De-skilling the refraction pro­cess would reduce the cost of training. This will help increase efciency and improve the quality of spectacle prescriptions and the cost of care. Although autorefraction is an alternative option that can be performed at home, the autorefrac­tometer must be portable, lightweight, reliable enough to avoid a subjective correction, and able to transfer data to an eye clinic or optical outlet. We will describe three such devices in the follow­ing section.
Fig. 35.1 Visual acuity testing using PEEK.A new letter appears when the phone is swiped in the direction the patient identies the letter. (Photo courtesy: Krishnaveni & Monika, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India)
35.3.1 Folding Phoropter (FoFo)
(Fig.35.2)
Technology: The Folding Phoropter is a foldable paper device comprising two retractable paper tubes with a converging and diverging lens on each tube. (Fig. 35.2; Left panel) Like a tele­scope, the user can move the tubes while looking through them and stop when the target is viewed clearly. The target image becomes clear by adjusting the distance between the lenses. A scale
474
T. Das et al.
ab
Fig. 35.2 Left panel: (a) optics; (b) the FoFo device. Right panel: schematic diagram describing how the FoFo is oper- ated. (Copyrights Padhay D etal., 2023 [5] under Creative Common Attribution License)
embedded into the device approximates the refractive error when a clear image is obtained and gives the spherical equivalent of the refrac­tive error. The refractive error range for the FoFo is +4.00 to–7.00 D.It is user-dependent since it relies on a subjective assessment of refractive error.
Technique: The FoFo is held at eye level in the non-dominant hand. The subject focuses on a dis­tance target of 6/60 level at 3m. The height or level of the eye is aligned parallel with the dis­tance target. The subject then focuses on the let­ter/image (Fig. 35.2; right panel). The target image becomes clear by adjusting the distance between the lenses. The dominant hand slides the outer tube to nd the point where the target appears clear. With one eye, the user looks through the FoFo and moves the tubes while x­ating on the distant target. The measurement of refractive error for each eye is done separately. When the endpoint for each eye is obtained, the scale on the FoFo gives the spherical equivalent of the refractive error.
Clinical Application: The FoFo is useful in screening during home visits. It could be used for screening children at schools as well. It is valu­able for refractive error assessment in low­resource settings. Its relative advantages and disadvantages are shown in Table35.3 [5].
35.3.2 QuickSee (e-See)
Technology: The QuickSee is a portable open­view wavefront aberrometer capable of conduct­ing binocular autorefraction. There is also a monocular model of the QuickSee, the
Table 35.3 Advantages and disadvantages of the FoFo
Advantages Disadvantages Easy to
understand and use
Requires less time
Inexpensive Cannot measure astigmatism Lightweight Breaks easily Portable Works well with literate people No need for
electricity/ battery
Difcult to measure the refractive error in people in extremes of age—Very elderly and young children
Findings are not reliable if used improperly
Cannot determine higher refractive errors
“QuickSee Flip” or “e-see,” specically designed to market at a lower price to increase accessibil­ity in low- and middle-income countries [6]. (Fig.35.3).
Technique: The subject holds the autorefractor to the face and looks through the device at a back-lit VA chart placed at 3 or 6m. The interpu­pillary distance wheel on the autorefractor and the pitch of the instrument are manually adjusted until one sees a red spot on the autorefractor. A trained technician is usually required to guide the subjects using it. The device illuminates the eye using a low-power laser diode through the pupil, and the light captured by the inbuilt wavefront sensor provides an estimate of the magnitude of various aberrations in the subject’s eye. An approximately 10-s video of the captured light is recorded for each eye. The device then uses this information to estimate the subject’s refraction and generate the spectacle prescription on a lap­top [7, 8].
Clinical Application: The e-see provides glass prescriptions that satisfy most individuals with-
ed (IR) Laser beam
35 Home Care andTeleophthalmology
475
out requiring highly trained personnel to perform subjective refraction.
35.3.3 InstaRef
Technology. InstaRef R20™ is a portable, Hartmann Shack wavefront aberrometer-based autorefractometer. It is a monocular handheld
Fig. 35.3 The e-See is used to refract one eye at a time
a
c
device weighing 400 g, allowing monocular refractive error measurements. (Fig.35.4) A spe­cic point on the retina is illuminated using an Infrared (IR) beam (Fig.35.4c-red) with a wave­length of 850nm, emitted from a laser module. The reected IR laser beam (Fig. 35.4c-blue) passes through the lens system. The wavefront sensor comprises a micro lenslet array measuring
12.92×8.75mm and 1.55mm thick. This array connes the reected light to a pattern of spots, which are detected by an image sensor measuring
4.76×5.61mm. (Fig.35.5) The tilt of the wave­front that enters each lenslet corresponds directly to the position of each spot on the image sensor. By determining the positions of the spots, the phase of the wavefront, which relates to the ocu­lar aberrations, is calculated. Using standard mathematical calculations, these spot-position coordinates are used in modal reconstruction to approximate the three-dimensional wavefront
Beamsplitter-1
Beamsplitter-2
Pupil centering Camera Module
Lens-1
Lens-2
b
Lenslet Array
Sensory Board
Fig. 35.4 InstaRef: (a) monocular device capture mode, (b) measurement recordings, and (c) optical components of the system. (Source: Rao DP, etal. [9])
IR Laser Module
Optical path details
InfraR Reflected IR laser beam Anterior Imaging path
476
Fig. 35.5 Optics of the InstaRef. (Kalpa-more details)
T. Das et al.
topology for lower order aberrations. The device also includes a pupil-centering module and an audible tilt warning system. The refractive error range is 10.0 D to +10.0D sphere and5.0D to +5.0D cylinder.
Technique. Using the non-testing eye, the subject is instructed to xate on a distant target (~20feet). This can eliminate the inuence of accommodation on measurement. The exam­iner places the device in front of the testing eye (Fig.35.4a). It is advisable to test under dim illumination so that the pupil diameter is large and the wavefront-based measurements are more reliable. The pupil-centration crosshair in the device is aligned with the center of the sub­ject’s pupil. The device alerts the examiner if there is any signicant tilt in the device through a tilt warning system. Once the crosshair is centered and after ensuring that the fellow eye is xed for the distance, the examiner triggers the measurement button. The device lets the examiner capture three readings per eye in 3s. Based on the three readings, the device auto­matically calculates the average of spherical, cylindrical, and axial values. It also allows the negative and positive representations of the cylindrical values. The same procedure is fol­lowed for refractive error measurement in the other eye. The results can be immediately
printed using Bluetooth-enabled printers or accessed on an electronic medical record system.
Clinical Applications. The InstaRef is a good starting point for subjective refraction in all age groups and is useful in clinical and community vision screening as a quick and reliable tool. The advantages of this tool are: it requires less clini­cal space, provides a quick reading, requires less training, and has electronic compatibility. Compared with the open-eld autorefractometer (OFAR), the device works well in adults [9], can be used pre- and post-cycloplegic treatment, and can be used for subjective refraction in children older than 8 [10].
35.4 Intraocular Pressure
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of visual impairment and blindness globally. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is one of the signs of glaucoma. The development and progression of glaucoma can be slowed only by controlling the IOP. Therefore, accurate measurement of IOP is of paramount importance. It can be measured at home by allied ophthalmic personnel using a handheld device. One such device is described below.
Generation of a voltage fluctuation in the
35 Home Care andTeleophthalmology
477
35.4.1 Rebound Tonometer
The Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT) is the current reference standard in IOP measure­ment. However, it requires a slit lamp, topical anesthesia, and sodium uorescein dye; it can only be measured with the patient in a sitting pos­ture. Other ocular tonometers, such as the rebound tonometer, are comparable to the GAT [11] while also portable, lightweight, easy to use, and do not require topical anesthesia.
Technology: The rebound tonometer consists of a tiny probe (of variable length) made of stainless steel with a 1.8mm diameter plastic ball. The probe is held in the device by an electromagnetic eld powered by a battery. When the button on the device is pushed, a spring drives the probe with its plastic ball to hit the corneal surface. The speed of deceleration of the probe when it hits the corneal surface is measured and converted into an IOP measurement. (Fig. 35.6) The speed of decelera­tion depends on the IOP; it is rapid for high IOPs and slow for low IOPs. The motion parameter (probe deceleration) and contact time (when the probe hits the cornea) are measured by an induc­tion-based coil system and analyzed by an advanced algorithm in the device. The rebound tonometer was introduced as the Icare TAO1i (Helsinki, Finland) device in 2003. Updated versions of the rebound tonometer, i.e., the Icare Pro, Icare 100, and Icare 200, were introduced subsequently. It weighs around 250–400g. It is handheld, recharge­able battery-operated, lightweight, and portable.
Technique: For recording the IOP, the patient sits upright, looks straight ahead, and keeps his/ her eyes steady (the device can also be used on the subject in a supine position). The device is held in front of the eye so that the ball of the probe is around 4–8mm from the center of the cornea and is perpendicular to the corneal sur­face. When the push button of the device is pressed, the probe touches the center of the cor­nea rapidly. Six consecutive measurements are taken, and the result is displayed on an LCD screen facing the examiner. The IOP measure­ment in the rebound tonometer does not need any prior eye preparation and does not need corneal anesthesia.
Unlike the rst-generation rebound tonome­ter, the current versions have magnetized probes and position sensors; these allow IOP measure­ments only if the probe is perpendicular to the center of the cornea (in sitting or supine posi­tions), thereby improving the reliability and repeatability of the IOP recordings.
Clinical Application: The rebound tonometer is particularly useful for recording IOP in condi­tions like corneal scarring, active inammatory and infectious corneal conditions, where other tonometers cannot record the IOP reliably. Additionally, in post-refractive surgery, for patients where an air-puff and/or applanation tonometer is contraindicated due to the risk of ap displacement, a rebound tonometer would be very useful for measuring IOP.However, its reli­ability decreases with increasing corneal thick-
Fig. 35.6 Rebound tonometer. Left: the device in use; the green circle indicates correct alignment; Right: the principle of the rebound tonometer works; (Reprinted
coil ends leads to a movement of the tonometer probe
tonometer
tonometer probe
Moving direction of the tonometer probe
with permission from Ruokonen PC etal. [12] Copyright, 2007, Springer Nature)