Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_103_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
354
ab
Fig. 27.10 Images of the retina captured under blue light and Sodium uorescein injected into blood (a) without and (b) with a barrier lter into the imaging path
S. Pal
is presented by a continuous blue line in Fig. 27.9a. It is ltered further with a low-pass
contrast, it is required that the boundaries of the excitation and barrier lters are well separated.
lter, known as an excitation lter, with a cut-on wavelength of around 500nm (blue dotted line in Fig.27.9a). Some system uses an excitation lter
27.4.5 Image Sensors
in conjunction with a powerful white light source, such as a halogen lamp, to produce the necessary blue light beam for FA.Light scattered back from the retina is ltered just before the sensor with a long-pass lter, commonly known as a barrier l­ter, with a cut-off wavelength near 515 nm. A bandpass lter can alternatively be used for this purpose. Once illuminated with blue light, all parts of the retina reect blue light towards imag­ing optics. Only the parts of the retina containing blood (blood vessels or areas of blood spillage) absorb blue and emit in the green region. Without a barrier lter, the camera detects both green and blue light returning from all parts of the retina and captures a picture like Fig. 27.10a. Fluorescein angiograph (Fig.27.10b) is then cap­tured by blocking blue rays with a barrier lter.
Edmund Optics [34] offers a pair of excitation and barrier lters, where an excitation lter has a cut-on wavelength at 506nm, and a barrier lter (a bandpass lter) has a lower cut-off at 513nm. To prevent spillover, which could reduce image
The image sensor is the last but not the least important part of the retinal camera. Two types of sensors are commonly used; (1) charged couple device (CCD) and (2) complementary metal­oxide semiconductor (CMOS). Until the rst decade of this century, CCDs were the preferred digital sensor for retinal imaging and many other scientic experiments. CCDs are generally sen­sors having larger pixel sizes, excellent sensitiv­ity, higher dynamic range, and low noise characteristics [35]. Higher sensitivity with lower noise allows imaging at a lower light level suit­able for fundus imaging. More importantly, higher dynamic range facilitates imaging of the bright optic disc and comparatively darker peripheral region simultaneously with satisfac­tory details.
CMOS sensors remained far behind CCDs in three qualities, as mentioned earlier, for many years [36]. In the previous decade, COMOS was increasingly recognized and used in many imag-
27 Paediatric Wide-Field Retinal Imaging
355
ing products, including medical devices and sci­entic experiments. (For example, in 2015, SONY decided to discontinue CCD manufactur­ing and focus on CMOS technology).
Recent developments in the semiconductor industry helped signicantly to improve the sen­sitivity, noise quality, and dynamic range of CMOS sensors, which are now at par with CCD. Additionally, CMOS consumes much lower power than a CCD, which makes it suitable for handheld, portable, and battery-operated sys­tems. In CMOS, a pixel size of a few degrees smaller than that of CCDs can be achieved, and therefore a much higher megapixel sensor can be produced in smaller sized devices. But one must be careful about selecting cameras with very small pixel sizes as this can increase the risk of crosstalk. The possibility of erecting an ON-chip processing unit with CMOS technology makes the overall size of CMOS cameras much smaller than a CCD camera. It also facilitates high-speed readout and, subsequently faster frame rate.
The performance of any camera system depends mainly on the judicial selection of the sensor. A frame rate of at least 15 frames per sec­ond (FPS) is essential for handheld imaging of the paediatric subject. A dynamic range close to 70 dB or more is suitable for capturing bright optic disc and darker periphery with useful details. Cameras with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) higher than 40dB are desirable. Compared to colour fun­dus imaging, FA requires greater quantum ef­ciency to capture generally weak uorescence.
27.5 Imaging Technique
Primary challenges in premature/infant screening are accessibility, poor cooperation, and a shorter time window for imaging. It is practically impos­sible to image a baby’s eyes in a supine position with conventional tabletop devices. Conversely, it is too early to make the newborn sit upright and place the chin over the chinrest. A portable hand-
held device is very much necessary for paediatric screening. A contact base operation is preferable for non-cooperative subjects, despite potential health risks like contamination or cornea scarring on rare occasions. Moreover, a wide-angle cam­era facilitates capturing a larger portion of the retina in a single image, reducing the screening time. This section will mainly focus on imaging techniques associated with the devices presented in Table27.1.
Contact devices use sterile lubricant gel between the contact lens and cornea to ensure smooth movement while manoeuvring the probe during the operation. Eye gel also creates a continuous medium of refractive index close to 1.4, which is between the corneal refractive index of 1.33 and the refractive index of a glass, commonly 1.5. It reduces Snell’s reection of light at the corneal surface, which can create glare/artefact on the nal image. A uniform contact of the imager with the cornea ensures continuity in the medium, reducing the risk of air pocket formation and unwanted artefacts due to reection.
It is comparatively easier to capture a macula­centric image. The main challenge is to capture ora serrata that needs a tilt even with the device having FoV as large as 150°. In imaging prema­ture babies, it is advisable to use an eyelid specu­lum to create space for easy manoeuvring of the imaging device, and occasionally, a depressor is used to improve the visibility of the peripheral region further (Fig.27.11).
Proper dilation of the pupil is essential for a uniformly illuminated retinal image. An inappro­priate dilation can lead to a central shadow on the captured image by blocking the light rays near the outer edge of the ring light (Fig.27.12).
FA is an invasive procedure and demands spe­cial attention. It is highly advisable to perform FA near a life support system to tackle the rare adverse effect of NaFl on the human body. Before starting the procedure for FA, a colour fundus image is generally taken to set an appropriate
356
ab
S. Pal
Fig. 27.11 (a) Speculum (b) depressor occasionally used for ROP screening
ab
Fig. 27.12 Possible image artefacts in ROP images; (a) shadow due to undilated pupil and (b) reection observed due to formation of air pockets inside lubricant gel (white arrow; images captured with the 3nethra neo-HD FA)
abc
Fig. 27.13 Progress dye into the blood after (a) 8.7 s, (b) 10.5 s, and (c) 14.3s after injecting the dye. (Camera: 3nethra neo-HD FA)
focus for the subject. A 10% solution of Sodium uorescein dye at 0.1ml per kg of baby’s weight is generally injected intravenously, followed by an isotonic saline ush [31]. In some situations,
oral NaFl dosing is used as an alternative. A timer is started at the time of injection of the dye. Software associated with the device attaches a time stamp from the timer running at the time of
27 Paediatric Wide-Field Retinal Imaging
357
the image capture and saves it with the image. Time stamps carry vital information as the con­trast and characteristic of the image primarily depends on the offset from the time of the shot. The image in Fig. 27.13a is captured when the dye reaches retinal blood vessels, and as a result, arteries are lighter compared to other parts of the retina. As time progresses, dye reaches other cap­illaries, and an image similar to Fig. 27.13c is captured.
27.6 Clinical Application
Wide-eld imaging in the paediatric sector is predominantly used for ROP screening. The retina is imaged up to 100–130° in a single click. The FoV can also be increased by mon­taging the images or using ultra-wide eld imaging system. These help in documentation, compare the retinopathy status between differ­ent follow-up visits, monitor the response to treatment, training, and telescreening. Besides better parental understanding of the disease’s progression and consequently better coopera­tion, image-based counselling allows parents to make decisions about their course of treatment and supports that course of action in the event of a medicolegal dispute. The imaging devices can pick of subtle vascular changes which a busy practitioner might miss while screening a large number of patients with indirect ophthalmo­scope. Image of mature retina without any sig­nature of ROP are presented in Panel-1(a, b) of Fig. 27.15. Whereas as mild tortuosity in the blood vessels is noticed on the image presented in Panel-1(c) of Fig.27.14, as an indication of
plus disease. Figure 27.14 also describes the various states of ROP [8].
Stage-1 ROP (Fig. 27.14, Panel 2a). A thin demarcation, relatively at, at the junction of vas­cular and avascular regions is seen.
Stage-2 ROP (Fig. 27.14, Panel 2b). The demarcation line changes into a wider elevated ridge. Isolated tufts of neovascular tissue on the retinal surface, commonly known as popcorn, may be seen posterior to the ridge in Stage-2 (white arrow, Panel 2c).
Stage-3 ROP (Fig. 27.14, Panel 3a). Extra­retinal neovascular proliferation extends from the ridge into the vitreous and is continuous, with the posterior aspect of the ridge producing a ragged appearance as proliferation progresses.
Stage-4 ROP (Fig.27.14, Panel 3b and c). It is characterized by a partial retinal detachment that spares or includes the fovea. Clinical signs of retinal detachment include loss of ne detail in the choroidal vasculature or the granular pigment epithelium, a ground glass appearance compared to the neighbouring connected retina, or both (Fig.27.14, Panel 4a).
Stage-5 ROP (Fig.27.14, Panel 4b). A total detachment is a rule.
Field of view is sometime extended beyond the limit set by the imaging system by stitching multiple images together, as presented in Fig. 27.15. Figure 27.15a shows a montage of four different colour fundus images having area of overlapping. Three angiographs, with similar time stamp, are stitched together and presented in Fig.27.15b.
Besides ROP screening, wide-angle imaging is also used to study retinoblastoma in infants (Fig.27.16).
358
abc
abc
abc
S. Pal
ab
Fig. 27.14 Panel 1. (a)†, (b) Mature retina without ROP; dichotomously branching of retinal blood vessels seen up to the end of the retina imaged, and (c) plus disease, show­ing tortuosity in the blood vessels in Zone-II.Panel 2. (a) Stage-1 with thin demarcation line in Zone-III. (b)† Stage-2 Zone-II ROP showing a ridge, hyperacutely branching retinal blood vessels, mild dilatation, and tortu­osity. (c) Stage-2 ROP shows a thick and elevated demar­cation line in Zone-III with popcorn lesion. Panel 3. (a)† The right eye shows Stage-3 Zone-II ROP with plus; note the nger like extensions from the posterior aspect of the ridge representative of extra-retinal brovascular prolif­eration. (b)† The left eye showing Stage-4A with plus and
narrowing of the angle between the temporal retinal vas­cular arcades. There was a fractional retinal detachment along the brovascular proliferation temporally, and (b) Stage-4A in Zone-III on the temporal side of the left eye with loss of choroidal detail on the extreme right of the image. Panel 4. (a)† The left eye Stage-4B Cicatricle ROP showing a retinal fold extending temporally from the optic disc. The macula and temporal vascular arcades are dragged within the retinal fold. (b)† Stage-5 ROP with total closed funnel retinal detachment. †Captured at LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India. (© Tapas R Padhi, MD, with permission)
ab
ab
27 Paediatric Wide-Field Retinal Imaging
Fig. 27.15 Montage of (a) colour fundus images and (b) uorescein angiographs. (a) shows structure created by photocoagulation at the top of the image
Fig. 27.16 (a) Colour fundus image (b) angiograph of a subject suffering from retinoblastoma
359
27.7 Conclusion
Wide-angle cameras with trans-pupillary illumina­tion are the preferred tools for paediatric screening. The study on trans-pars-planar illumination will continue to search for a potential alternative which frees the pupil for imaging and helps extend FoV beyond the current standard. Trans-pars-planar illumination, as far as the author is aware, has not yet been demonstrated for FA and may be an area to explore. However, it may encounter difculties due to the shorter penetration depth of blue light. A transition from trans-pupillary lighting to a trans­pars-planar illumination system may occur soon, whereas the imaging system may continue with its current structure. The use of CMOS sensors for retinal imaging is expected to increase after the recent advancement in the respective eld.
Funding Nil.
Disclosure Forus Employee.
References
1. Owens WC, Owens EU. Retrolental broplasia in premature infants. Am J Ophthalmol. 1949;32:1–21.
2. Reese AB, King MJ, Owens WC. Classication of retrolental broplasia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36(10):1333–5.
3. Patz A. Retrolental broplasia. Surv Ophthalmol. 1969;14(1):1–29.
4. Flynn JT, O’Grady GE, Herrera J, etal. Retrolental broplasia: I.Clinical observations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(2):217–23.
5. Kushner BJ, Essner D, Cohen IJ, Flynn JT.Retrolental broplasia. II. Pathologic correlation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(1):29–38.
6. Kingham JD. Acute retrolental broplasia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(1):39–47.
7. The Committee for the Classication of Retinopathy of Prematurity. An international classication of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(8):1130–4.
8. The Committee for the Classication of Retinopathy of Prematurity. An international classication of retinopathy of prematurity, Third edition. Arch Ophthalmol. 2021;128(10):51–68.
9. Wang SK, Korot E, Zaidi M, etal. Modeling abso­lute zone size in retinopathy of prematurity in relation
360
S. Pal
to axial length. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4717. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41598- 022- 08680- 5.
10. Toslak D, Chau F, Erol MK, etal. Trans-pars-planar illumination enables a 200° ultra-wide eld pediatric fundus camera for easy examination of the retina. Biomed Opt Express. 2020;11:68–76.
11. Atkinson A, Mazo C. Imaged area of the retina.
https://www.freelists.org/archives/optimal/02- 2017/ pdf91WmMGLh6Q.pdf.
12. Prakalapakorn SG, Wallace DK, Freedman SF.Retinal imaging in premature infants using the Pictor noncon­tact digital camera. J AAPOS. 2014;18(4):321–6.
13. Davitt BV, Wallace DK. Plus disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(6):663–70.
14. Vinekar A, Gilbert C, Dogra M, etal. The KIDROP model of combining strategies for providing retinopa­thy of prematurity screening in underserved areas in India using wide-eld imaging, tele-medicine, non­physician graders and smart phone reporting. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(1):41–9.
15. Vinekar A, Jayadev C, Mangalesh S, et al. Role of tele-medicine in retinopathy of prematurity screening in rural outreach centers in India—a report of 20,214 imaging sessions in the KIDROP program. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;20(5):335–45.
16. Ji MH, Zaidi M, Bodnar Z, etal. Effective eld of view of wide-eld fundus photography in the Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP). Sci Rep. 2022;12:19276.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 022- 22964- w.
17. Harris WF.Nodes and nodal points and lines in eyes and other optical systems. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;30(1):24–42.
18. Yao X, Toslak D, Son T, Ma J. Understanding the relationship between visual-angle and eye-angle for reliable determination of the eld-of-view in ultra­wide eld fundus photography. Biomed Opt Express. 2021;12:6651–9.
19. DeHoog E, Schwiegerling J.Fundus camera systems: a comparative analysis. Appl Opt. 2009;48:221–8.
20. Gullstrand A. New methods of reexless ophthal­moscopy. Berichte Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft. 1910;36:326.
21. Keeler R, Singh AD, Dua HS.Reecting on reec­tions: Gullstrand’s large reex-free ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:826.
22. Kaschke M, Kaschke KH, Rill MS.Optical devices in ophthalmology and optometry. Wiley-VCH; 2013.
23. Toslak D, Thapa D, Chen Y, et al. Trans-palpebral illumination: an approach for wide-angle fundus pho­tography without the need for pupil dilation. Opt Lett. 2016;41(12):2688–91.
24. Toslak D, Thapa D, Chen Y, etal. Wide-eld fundus imaging with trans-palpebral illumination. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2017;10045:100451X. https://doi.
org/10.1117/12.2252491.
25. Wang B, Toslak D, Alam MN, et al. Contact-free trans-pars-planar illumination enables snapshot fun­dus camera for nonmydriatic wide eld photogra­phy. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8768. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41598- 018- 27112- x.
26. Laforest T, Künzi M, Kowalczuk L, etal. Transscleral optical phase imaging of the human retina. Nat Photonics. 2020;14(7):439–45.
27. Lingenfelder C, Koch F, Koelbl P, etal. Transscleral LED illumination pen. Biomed Eng Lett. 2017;7:311–5.
28. Kölbl PS, Lindner C, Lingenfelder C, etal. An extra­ocular non-invasive transscleral LED-endoilluminator for eye speculum integration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253:1529–35.
29. Pomerantzeff O, Govignon J.Design of wide-angle ophthalmoscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;80:420–4.
30. Pomerantzeff O. Equator-plus camera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sc. 1975;14:401–6.
31. Lepore D, Molle F, Pagliara MM, etal. Atlas of uo­rescein angiographic ndings in eyes undergoing laser for retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(1):168–75.
32. Chopdar A.Fundus uorescein angiography. Elsevier Health Service; 1996.
33. Doughty MJ. pH dependent spectral properties of sodium uorescein ophthalmic solutions revisited. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:167. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1475- 1313.2009.00703.x.
34. Fluorescence Filter Set. https://www.edmundoptics.
in/p/uorescence- lter- set- for- tc- uorescein/21528/.
35. Durini D.High performance silicon imaging: funda­mentals and applications of CMOS and CCD sensors. Elsevier Science; 2019.
36. Bigas M, Cabruja E, Forest J, Salvi J. Review of CMOS imagers. Microelectron J. 2006;37(5):433–51.
Optical Coherence Tomography
andOptical Coherence Tomography-Angiography
NirojKumarSahoo , PriyaR.Chandrasekaran , NinanJacob , andGemmyCheung
28
28.1 Introduction
28.1.1 Principles ofOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
The fundamental principle behind OCT imaging is light interference. The basic mechanism of an OCT can be described with the help of a Michelson interferometer, as described below. The light from a low coherence (high bandwidth) source is split into two paths by a coupler, directing it along two separate arms of the interferometer, the sample arm, and the reference arm. As the light exits either arm, it is passed through lenses and mir­rors to control its shape, depth of focus, intensity, etc. A reference mirror reects the light back into the reference arm, and it returns along the same path it came on, whereas the light in the sample arm is backscattered by the sample of interest. The returning light from both arms recombines at the coupler and generates an interference pattern recorded by the detector. The sample beam has to
N. K. Sahoo Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Vijayawada, India
P. R. Chandrasekaran · G. Cheung (*) Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore e-mail: Gemmy.cheung.c.m@singhealth.com.sg
N. Jacob Anant Bajaj Retina Institute, Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Vijayawada, India
be moved across the sample to record an A scan at each point, which can be combined to generate an OCT image or a B scan. For a given wavelength, the axial resolution is based on the bandwidth, whereas the lateral resolution is limited by the diffraction caused by the pupil and the minimum spot size of the focused probing beam. [1].
28.1.2 OCT Systems (Table28.1)
The early time-domain (TD)-OCT technology is based on scanning reference delay. This setup is lim­ited by the time constraints and mechanical inertia imposed by the moving reference mirror, limiting the number of A scans to a few thousand per second. Most systems in clinical use now are Fourier-domain (FD)-OCT [Fig. 28.1]. The key difference between the two is that the FD-OCT uses a static reference mirror, which facilitates higher data acquisition speeds. By performing an inverse Fourier transform, the acquired wavenumber- dependent data is trans­formed into axial scan information. FD-OCT imag­ing includes spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT). [1].
28.1.2.1 SD-OCT
Spectrometer-based FD-OCT uses a diffraction grating element to spatially separate the different wavelength contributions into a line image recorded by a high-speed charge-coupled device (CCD) line camera. A Fourier transform is
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024 T. Das, P. Satgunam (eds.), Ophthalmic Diagnostics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0138-4_28
361
362
ac
Table 28.1 Comparison of various OCT systems
TD-OCT SD-OCT SS-OCT
Fixed reference mirror
Features Wavelength 810nm 840nm 1052nm A scan/s 512 scans/s 50,000 scans/s 100,000 scans/s Axial resolution Lateral resolution Artifacts More Less Less Length of line scan 6mm Up to 9mm Up to 12mm Range of imaging Vitreoretinal interface to
Movable reference mirror
10μm 8μm 6μm 20μm 20μm 20μm
retinal pigment epithelium
Spectrometer Tunable laser light source
Posterior cortical vitreous to sclera using enhanced depth imaging mode
Posterior cortical vitreous to sclera
N. K. Sahoo et al.
b
Fig. 28.1 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). (a) Schematic diagram of a spectral-domain OCT.It uses a spectrometer for the detection of interfer­ence signals. (b) Schematic diagram of a swept-source OCT.It uses a rapid wavelength-swept light source and
performed on the spectrally resolved interference pattern detected by the camera array to obtain the A scan [1, 2].
balanced detection to detect interference signals. (c) Example of signal detection for the three partial reectors. Fourier transformation results in the production of three images corresponding to the reectors. [CCD charge- coupled device]
over a broad range of wavelengths [1, 2]. In contrast to SD-OCT, SS-OCT uses a high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera and two parallel photodetectors.
28.1.2.2 SS-OCT
The broadband light source is replaced by a tun­able laser rapidly sweeping a narrow line width
A long imaging range of nearly 7.5mm allows a better view of the vitreoretinal interface and the choroid in a single frame [1, 2].
28 Optical Coherence Tomography andOptical Coherence Tomography-Angiography
363
28.1.3 Scanning Protocols andQuantitative Measures: (Tables 28.2 and28.3)
Various pre-set acquisition protocols are avail­able on most commercial OCT instruments. These differ in the area covered, the distance between adjacent scans, the number of scans averaged at each location, and the orientation of scans. Understanding these will ensure that the most appropriate protocol is used for the pathol­ogy being evaluated. Most commercial instru-
Table 28.2 OCT scanning protocols and measurements
1. Macular cube scan A macular cube scan or a three-dimensional (3D) scan
consists of a number of horizontal line scans composed of a 6mm x 6mm, 7mm x 7mm square grid, or a 12mm x 9mm rectangular grid. It generates a 3D view of the image, which can be subject to complex analysis
2. Radial scan The radial scan consists of 6–12 line scans arranged at
equal angles with a common axis. By coinciding with the common axis with the fovea, the relationship of the lesion with the fovea can be ascertained
ments also provide the user with basic software which supports retinal layer segmentation and quantitative assessments such as retinal thick­ness. Since the boundaries used for quantication differ between instruments, quantitative values such as central retinal thickness must be con­verted before comparing the instruments. As scan speed increases, dense volume scans can be acquired, which can, in turn, be used to generate en face images. In enhanced depth imaging (EDI)-mode, the instrument is purposefully dis­placed to image the deeper layers. Since the
3. Raster scan A raster scan consists of a series of parallel line scans
that can be oriented at any angle and has a high resolution. The length, angle, and spacing between the lines can be adjusted to acquire the best view of the area of interest
Center point The intersection of the six radial scans of the fast macular
thickness protocol of the OCT
Central subeld Circular area of diameter 1mm centered around the
center point. A total of 128 thickness measurements are made in this circular area in the fast macula protocol
Center point thickness The average thickness values for the six radial scans at
their point of intersection
Central subeld mean thickness The mean value of the 128 thickness values obtained in
the central subeld
Retinal thickness
Subfoveal choroidal thickness
Value in μm of the distance between the OCT layers assumed to be the RPE and the internal limiting membrane
Value in μm of the distance from the outer edge of the hyperreective line corresponding to the retinal pigment epithelium to the inner surface of the sclera