Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5514_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
46 Мб
Скачать
54
ab ab
Fig. 4.15 Renal anomalies in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. (a) 2-day-old boy with covered exstrophy variant. Transverse midline grayscale image from a screening ultrasound (US) shows a midline pelvic, fused kidney with multiple cysts (C=largest cyst). S=spine; P=psoas muscle. (b) 3-day-old boy with cloacal exstrophy. Sagittal grayscale US image of the pelvis, to the right of the midline, shows the right kidney in an ectopic, pelvic position with normal morphology. Note the lower lumber spine and sacrum posterior to the kidney (arrows)
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Fig. 4.16 UTD following bladder exstrophy repair. A 4-month-old boy with bladder exstrophy. 1month after stage 1 repair, a sagittal grayscale ultrasound image of the left kidney (a) and left ureter (b) showed UTD including central calyceal dilation, renal pelvic (P) and ureteral (U) dila­tion developed. Initial renal bladder ultrasound was normal (not shown). The postoperative UTD ultimately resolved
In the setting of recurrent urinary tract infections, dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and mercapto-actyl-triglycine (MAG3) nuclear medicine exams can be valuable to assess renal parenchymal scarring and function. One series found that male patients were at greater risk for UTD, both presence and degree, as well as compromised renal function [32]. However, lower tract surgical and clinical status (e.g., ureteral reimplantation, continence, bladder pressure) and risk of high blood pressure were not associated with upper tract outcomes (e.g., dilation, function) [32, 33].
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
55
ab
Fig. 4.17 Two boys with epispadias. (a) 2.5-year-old boy with epispadias. Right oblique uoro- scopic image from a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) shows bilateral vesicoureteral reux (VUR), a smooth-walled bladder, and a shortened urethral length. The arrow indicates contrast at the distal end of the urethra. (b) Left oblique uoroscopic image from a VCUG of a 7-month-old boy shows bilateral VUR, a smooth-walled bladder, and shortened urethral length. The arrow indi­cates the location of the meatus with contrast directed cephalad during the voiding phase
During closure of bladder exstrophy, ureteral stents and suprapubic cystostomy catheters are placed. Some centers perform “stentograms,” where contrast is instilled through the ureteral stents by gravity into the upper tracts and ureteral drainage is assessed prior to removing the stents (Fig.4.18). The contrast infusion is adminis­tered by gravity and is positioned at a height of 30cm or less above the level of the kidneys so that it is administered at low pressure. A cystogram through the suprapu­bic catheter can demonstrate contrast extravasation, contour of the bladder, and bladder capacity (Fig.4.19). Prior to reimplantation, the distal ureters have been described as having a “J-shape” [34]. The ureters are sometimes reimplanted at the time of primary closure and are more often reimplanted at the time of bladder neck reconstruction.
Fluoroscopic imaging can also be used to assess for complications, when suspected, including of the urethra, by retrograde urethrography or voiding cystogram. Following epispadias repair, the urethra may have an irregular appearance.
56
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
a
b
cde
Fig. 4.18 Stentograms in two patients. (a) 4-month-old boy, 2 weeks after bladder exstrophy repair. Abdominal radiograph showing right ureteral stent (open black arrowhead), left ureteral stent (open white arrowhead), and transurethral bladder (solid white arrowhead) catheters are pres­ent. A cast is partially seen due to iliac osteotomies. (b) Fluoroscopic image from the left stento­gram. Contrast is instilled into the left ureteral stent with lling of the left renal calyces and ureter (open white arrowhead). Transurethral bladder catheter (solid white arrowhead). (c) Moments later, the contrast is seen draining into the irregularly shaped bladder (asterisks). (d, e) 4-month-old girl, 2 weeks following bladder exstrophy closure with bilateral ureteral reimplantation. Right (open black arrowhead) and left (open white arrowhead) ureteral stents and a transurethral bladder catheter (solid white arrowhead) are present. Contrast was administered into the right stent with prompt contrast drainage into the bladder (not shown). Next, the contrast was administered to the left stent. There is left ureteral (open white arrowhead), renal pelvic, and calyceal dilation. No contrast drained into the bladder during the examination. A cast is seen over the upper abdomen
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
Fig. 4.19 Cystogram of a 3-month-old boy, 1month following complete primary repair of exstrophy with bladder neck reconstruction. Contrast was instilled by gravity infusion into the suprapubic cystostomy catheter (black arrowhead). The irregularly shaped bladder (asterisks) lls with contrast. There is prompt right and left vesicoureteral reux. A cast is present over the abdomen supporting iliac osteotomies
57

Musculoskeletal System

Radiography is an excellent tool to examine the skeletal system and is often the rst radiologic imaging done on a child with EEC to assess pubic diastasis (Fig.4.20). When cross-sectional imaging is indicated to evaluate the musculoskeletal anatomy, either MRI or CT can be used. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages. While MRI is radiation-free, a young child usually requires sedation or anesthesia to remain still during image acquisition. However, MRI is preferred for soft tissue evaluation due to the high spatial resolution and better tissue contrast in those with­out external xation hardware or MRI-incompatible implants. Even though CT exposes a child to radiation, current CT technology can obtain diagnostic images with low doses and can provide valuable information about the osseous pelvis. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions can be generated from either modality (Fig.4.21). 3D-computerized and printed models can aid surgical planning, multi­disciplinary care discussions, and patient and family education, especially in more complex or variant anatomy [35]. Some centers routinely perform dedicated imag­ing of the pelvis before and after surgical repair; however, there are no set guide­lines [36].
58
Fig. 4.20 Pubic diastasis assessment. Anterior posterior pelvic radiograph in a newborn boy with bladder exstrophy on day of life one. There is wide separation of the pubic symphysis (dashed line), consistent with pubic diastasis and a typical nding associated with bladder exstrophy
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Imaging has afforded a better understanding of the pelvic musculoskeletal anat­omy in children with EEC.Studies of CT and MRI of the pelvis prior to and follow­ing exstrophy repair have described the structure of the pelvis, including angular and linear distances between bones and pelvic oor muscles, as well as how the surgeries affect these anatomic relationships and the potential sequelae on pelvis shape, acetabular morphology, and continence [37, 38]. The focus of these studies is on classic bladder exstrophy (CBE), noting that within the EEC spectrum, the pelvic structure of children with epispadias is closer to normal, and those with cloa­cal exstrophy can have greater asymmetry between each side of the pelvis compared with CBE.
Children with CBE have shorter pubic bones, external rotation of the pelvis and retroversion of the acetabulae, as well as alteration in the muscles of the pelvic dia­phragm, or levator ani muscle group [3941]. The levator ani muscle group, includ­ing the iliococcygeus, pubococcygeus, and puborectalis sling muscles, is oriented in an anterior to posterior direction and attaches to the pubis and coccyx. The levator ani muscles are further supported through lateral attachments to the obturator inter­nus muscles, which originate along the inferior aspect of the superior pubic ramus and insert on the greater trochanter of the femur. The muscular diaphragm supports the pelvic genitourinary anatomy and has sphincteric function. The levator ani in patients with CBE are wider and atter than normal with increased dome-shaped contour, which is disproportionately pulled anteriorly. As a result, the puborectalis sling is not centered on the genitourinary structures and anus, which can affect con­tinence [40, 41] (Fig.4.22).
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
ab
59
c
d
ef
Fig. 4.21 CT of the pelvis of a boy with bladder exstrophy prior to and following stage 1 repair in bladder exstrophy. (a–c) Images from preoperative CT, at 3months of age, with images at the level of the pubis (a) and S1 (b) showing the expected osseous conguration in a patient with blad­der exstrophy. The pubic bones are shortened and pubic diastasis is present (dashed line). The pelvis is externally rotated with an “open-book” appearance. (c) 3D-reconstruction rendered from 2D-preoperative images. (d–f) One month following surgery, (d) the pubic bones are more approx­imated (dashed line), and (e) posterior iliac osteotomies have been done to help close the midline repair. Healing bone is present at the osteotomies (arrows). The cystostomy catheter is partially visualized in (d) and the cystostomy and right ureteral stent are partially visualized in (d) and (e). (f) 3D-reconstruction rendered from 2D-postoperative images
60
ab
Fig. 4.22 Pelvic oor musculature in bladder exstrophy. Axial T2 SPACE MRI image of the pel­vis (a) through the level of the pubic bones in an 11-month-old boy with skin-covered exstrophy variant compared to a normal infant (b). There is pubic diastasis (dashed line). The levator ani muscle group (arrows) is disproportionately positioned anteriorly. The rectum and urethra are rela­tively anterior. O=obturator internus muscles
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Because of the origins and insertions of the pelvic oor musculature, it would follow that the skeletal differences in children with EEC would portend muscu­lar differences. Analyzing musculoskeletal relationships along with the clinical outcomes may improve attainment of the surgical goals of abdominal wall clo­sure and urinary continence while reducing morbidity [42]. However, under­standing which musculoskeletal relationships correlate with continence has been challenging as children continue to grow and develop after surgery and normative relationships are not established. Those who have attained continence have been described as having a pelvic shape closer to that of age-matched unaf­fected children [43].
In order to reduce tension on the midline closure, the pubic bones are reap­proximated. Depending on the age of the child at the time of surgery and the degree of diastasis, the pubis may be reapproximated with tension sutures alone in newborn infants or pelvic osteotomies in older infants and children. The con­sideration of which type of osteotomy is addressed in another chapter. Pubic diastasis is most commonly observed by radiographs in a newborn with classic bladder exstrophy or cloacal exstrophy. A transverse linear measurement between the midportion of the right and left pubic bones denes the distance of the diastasis. In skeletally immature children, only the ossied bone, and not the cartilage, is visible by radiograph. Diastasis can also be measured on CT and MRI.Following osteotomies, bone healing and hardware can be monitored by radiographs or CT.
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
61

Spine

Of children with EEC, those with cloacal exstrophy most commonly have spine anomalies associated with the OEIS complex, which may take the form of vertebral segmentation anomalies and/or closed (i.e., skin-covered) spinal dysraphisms. Radiography can depict vertebral anomalies, and spinal US is used as a rst-line screening evaluation of the spinal cord (Figs.4.23 and 4.24). Spine US in the neo­nate is a non-invasive, well-tolerated examination and readily detects anomalies of the spinal canal, which can be visualized commonly up to 6months of age due to the timing of spine ossication [44]. It is ideally performed with the infant in the prone position. If additional imaging is warranted, a spine MRI can be obtained to further classify the anomaly, which can range from closed to open dysraphism (Fig.4.24) [45].
Fig. 4.23 Thoracoabdominal radiograph in a newborn girl with cloacal exstrophy shows mid-thoracic vertebral anomalies (arrows) and an omphalocele (asterisks) projecting over the pelvis
62
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
a
c
bd
Fig. 4.24 Spine US and MRI in two patients with cloacal exstrophy. (a) Sagittal ultrasound (US) image of the spine with the infant in the prone position on the day of life 0. The vertebral levels are numbered. The low-lying conus is associated with a round, echogenic lesion (asterisk) suspicious for a lipoma. The lum terminale is thickened (arrow). These features are concerning for tethered cord. (b) Sagittal T2 TSE MRI images at 1week of life, in the midline showing the same ndings as seen in US. (c) Spine ultrasound of the second child on the day of life 3 with the conus and nerve roots communicating with a uid-lled sac in the inferior soft tissues (asterisk) at the level of the hypoplastic sacrum (arrows). Skin overlies the uid-lled sac. (d) Sagittal T2 TSE image of the spine just to the left of the midline at 1month of age showing the abnormal conguration of the sacrum (arrow) and low-lying cord. On MRI tissue with fat signal characteristics was identied associated with the uid-lled sac (asterisk), consistent with a lipomyelomeningocele

Conclusions

Prenatal and postnatal imaging are each important in the care of children with EEC but serve two distinct roles. Prenatal imaging primarily serves to make an accurate diagnosis in order to facilitate prenatal counseling and prepare for postnatal care. Postnatal imaging, however, helps to more completely dene the child’s anatomy and monitors for post-surgical complications. Understanding the prenatal imaging manifestations, pitfalls, associated anatomic anomalies, and potential complications of care strengthens the communication between the radiologist, urologist, and medical team.
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
63

References

1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(11):E13–24.
2. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice parameter for the perfor­mance of detailed second- and third-trimester diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(12):3093–100.
3. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice parameter for the perfor­mance of detailed diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations between 12 weeks 0 days and 13 weeks 6 days. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(5):E1–16.
4. Gearhart JP, Ben-Chaim J, Jeffs RD, Sanders RC.Criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(6):961–4.
5. Mirk P, Calisti A, Fileni A.Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of bladder extrophy. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5(5):291–3.
6. Antomarchi J, Moeglin D, Laurichesse H, Combourieu D, Bigi N, Maisonneuve E, etal. The pubic diastasis measurement, a key element for the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of the bladder exstrophy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(6):435–40.
7. Mallmann MR, Mack-Detlefsen B, Reutter H, Pohle R, Gottschalk I, Geipel A, etal. Isolated bladder exstrophy in prenatal diagnosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(2):355–63.
8. Pakdaman R, Woodward PJ, Kennedy A.Complex abdominal wall defects: appearances at prenatal imaging. Radiographics. 2015;35(2):636–49.
9. Manganaro L, Antonelli A, Bernardo S, Capozza F, Petrillo R, Satta S, etal. Highlights on MRI of the fetal body. Radiol Med. 2018;123(4):271–85.
10. Marine MB, Forbes-Amrhein MM.Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal gastrointestinal system. Pediatr Radiol. 2020;50(13):1895–906.
11. Weiss DA, Oliver ER, Borer JG, Kryger JV, Roth EB, Groth TW, et al. Key anatomic nd­ings on fetal ultrasound and MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of bladder and cloacal exstrophy. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(5):665–71.
12. Dannull KA, Browne LP, Meyers MZ.The spectrum of cloacal malformations: how to differ­entiate each entity prenatally with fetal MRI.Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(3):387–98.
13. Carey JC, Greenbaum B, Hall BD.The OEIS complex (omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, spinal defects). Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14(6B):253–63.
14. Carey JC.Exstrophy of the cloaca and the OEIS complex: one and the same. Am J Med Genet. 2001;99(4):270.
15. Feldkamp ML, Botto LD, Amar E, Bakker MK, Bermejo-Sánchez E, Bianca S, etal. Cloacal exstrophy: an epidemiologic study from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(4):333–43.
16. Coleman PW, Marine MB, Weida JN, Gray BW, Billmire DF, Brown BP.Fetal MRI in the identication of a fetal ventral wall defect spectrum. AJP Rep. 2018;8(4):e264–76.
17. Hamada H, Takano K, Shiina H, Sakai T, Sohda S, Kubo T. New ultrasonographic cri­terion for the prenatal diagnosis of cloacal exstrophy: elephant trunk-like image. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2123–4.
18. Goncalves LF, Hill H, Bailey S.Prenatal and postnatal imaging techniques in the evaluation of disorders of sex development. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019;28(5):150839.
19. Coblentz AC, Teixeira SR, Mirsky DM, Johnson AM, Feygin T, Victoria T.How to read a fetal magnetic resonance image 101. Pediatr Radiol. 2020;50(13):1810–29.
20. Zalel Y, Lehavi O, Aizenstein O, Achiron R.Development of the fetal spinal cord: time of ascendance of the normal conus medullaris as detected by sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(11):1397–401; quiz 1402.
21. Bronshtein M, Riechler A, Zimmer EZ.Prenatal sonographic signs of possible fetal genital anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 1995;15(3):215–9.
22. Valioulis I, Levard G, Lottmann H, Hameury F, Cendron J.A rare complex bladder exstrophy variant. BJU Int. 2000;86(3):398–400.