Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5514_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
46 Мб
Скачать
34
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back

Prenatal Imaging Findings

Bladder Exstrophy

Demonstration of a uid-lled urinary bladder is a required component of all fetal anatomic examinations, regardless of whether the examination is a routine second­trimester screening ultrasound, a detailed fetal anatomic survey performed for a known or suspected anomaly, or a late rst-trimester anatomic survey for patients in whom earlier assessment is indicated [13]. The normal fetal urinary bladder is located in the midline anterior pelvis, is bordered on both sides by the umbilical arteries (Fig.4.1), and should ll and empty over the course of an examination. In the case of bladder exstrophy, the anterior abdominal wall and bladder fail to fuse and result in an infraumbilical wall defect with bladder mucosa exposed to the amniotic uid. Fetal urine is released directly into amniotic space, leading to the pathognomonic nding of bladder exstrophy—a non-visualized, or “absent,” uri­nary bladder (Figs.4.2 and 4.3) [4, 5].
In addition to an “absent” urinary bladder, several other sonographic ndings are typically present that assist in prenatally diagnosing bladder exstrophy. These include a low abdominal cord insertion (Figs.4.2 and 4.3); genital abnormalities (Fig.4.4), such as epispadias or bid penis in males and bid clitoris and vaginal and/or uterine anomalies in females; and bony pelvic abnormalities, such as pubic diastasis and attening of the iliac bones (Figs.4.2 and 4.3) [47]. The exstrophied bladder may vary in appearance and range from irregularity of the infraumbilical abdominal wall (Fig.4.4) to a bulging infraumbilical mass mimicking an omphalo­cele (Fig.4.5) [4, 8]. In the former instance, the infraumbilical irregularity is sec­ondary to inammation of the exposed posterior bladder wall mucosa, whereas in the latter instance, the mass-like appearance is secondary to protrusion and eversion of the bladder plate.
MRI is a powerful imaging adjunct for the assessment of complex fetal anoma­lies, and, unlike ultrasound, is not subject to some of the limitations that can con­strain sonographic evaluation, such as fetal positioning, anterior placenta, and maternal body habitus [9]. In addition, MRI offers excellent tissue contrast, which is particularly helpful in evaluating genitourinary and gastrointestinal abnormalities.
The primary MRI ndings of isolated bladder exstrophy are identical to those of ultrasound—non-visualized urinary bladder, infraumbilical abdominal wall defect with a low cord insertion, and pubic diastasis (Figs.4.6, 4.7, and 4.8)—however, the added value of MRI is in conrming the absence of other anomalies that may confer a more severe diagnosis on the EEC spectrum. The T1-signal characteristics of meconium allow for thorough assessment for hindgut abnormalities, which should be absent in isolated bladder exstrophy. T1-hyperintense meconium should be seen
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
35
a
b
c
Fig. 4.1 Normal ultrasound ndings in a 21-week gestation fetus (a) and a 22-week gestation fetus (b and c). (a) Color Doppler image through the pelvis demonstrates a normal anechoic and uid-lled bladder bordered by both umbilical arteries. (b) Transverse grayscale image through the iliac wings demonstrates a normal iliac angle. (c) A transverse grayscale image through the lower pelvis shows a normal conguration of the symphysis pubis with the ossication centers (arrows) appropriately angled toward the midline. Distance between the ossied portions of the symphysis pubis measured <1cm (not shown)
within the rectum after 20weeks gestational age, and there should be progressive lling of the more proximal colon as the pregnancy advances [10]. If an anteriorly displaced anus is present, the course of the rectum to the perineum may be easier to appreciate on MRI, as the rectal meconium signal should be readily identiable (Figs.4.6, 4.7, and 4.8).
36
ab
cd
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Fig. 4.2
Ultrasound ndings of classic bladder exstrophy at 21weeks gestation. (a) Transverse color Doppler image through the pelvis and umbilical arteries demonstrates the absence of an anechoic uid-lled bladder between the two umbilical arteries, consistent with bladder exstrophy. (b) Sagittal grayscale image through the lower abdomen demonstrates an infraumbilical defect (arrowhead) representing the exstrophied bladder immediately below the abdominal cord insertion (arrow) and cephalad to the external genitalia (open arrowhead), which were abnormal in appear­ance (not shown). (c) Transverse grayscale image through the pelvis demonstrates the infraumbili­cal defect (arrowheads) and bladder plate bulging between the exed and adducted legs. (d) Transverse grayscale image through the anterior bony pelvis reveals separation of the symphysis pubis (arrows) with the ossied portions demonstrating an abnormal parallel conguration. In addition, the distance between the ossied portions of the symphysis is abnormal and >1 cm (1.3cm, not shown), and the ndings are consistent with pubic diastasis. (e) Transverse grayscale image through the perineum reveals normal hyperechoic anal mucosa (*) surrounded by a ring of normal hypoechoic anal sphincter muscle (open arrows). (f) Sagittal grayscale image through the pelvis and perineum reveals the normal echogenic rectal mucosa (*) extending to the anal orice (open arrow). (g) Postnatal photograph demonstrating the exstrophied bladder (between open arrows) and the abnormal external male genitalia consistent with epispadias (circle)
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
37
e
f
g
Fig. 4.2 (continued)
38
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Careful assessment of the abdomen and pelvis is crucial in distinguishing iso­lated bladder exstrophy from bladder exstrophy associated with cloacal exstrophy, which is discussed in greater detail in the following section. In isolated bladder exstrophy, there should be no abnormalities of the spine, such as spinal dysraphisms or anomalous vertebrae. Similarly, abnormalities of the hindgut, such as imperforate anus, should not be present in isolated bladder exstrophy. It is important to note that the anus may be anteriorly displaced in isolated bladder exstrophy and slightly dif­cult to demonstrate, potentially giving the false impression of an associated imper­forate anus. Careful assessment of the perineum can often identify a displaced anus and avoid misdiagnosis. Free-oating intra-amniotic bowel loops also should not be seen in cases of isolated bladder exstrophy, as fusion of the posterior bladder plate halves prevents extrusion of bowel loops into the amniotic uid; identication of intra-amniotic bowel loops arising through an infraumbilical defect strongly sug­gests that the bladder halves are separate and unfused, which is a feature of cloacal exstrophy. Lastly, the abdominal wall defect present in isolated bladder exstrophy should be infraumbilical and not involve or extend above the level of the cord inser­tion, as would be seen with an omphalocele.
Fig. 4.3
Ultrasound ndings of classic bladder exstrophy at 24weeks gestation. (a) Transverse color Doppler image through the pelvis and umbilical arteries demonstrates the absence of an anechoic uid-lled bladder between the two umbilical arteries. (b) Sagittal grayscale image through the lower abdomen demonstrates an infraumbilical defect (arrowhead) representing the exstrophied bladder immediately below the abdominal cord insertion (arrow) and cephalad to the external genitalia (open arrow). (c) Three-dimensional image of the lower abdominal and pelvic wall shows the abdominal cord insertion (arrow), the bladder plate (arrowhead) bulging between the exed and adducted legs, and the external genitalia (open arrowhead). (d) Transverse grayscale image through the anterior bony pelvis demonstrates pubic diastasis (arrows). Although one ossi­cation center is angled toward the midline, the other is not, and the distance between the ossied portions is abnormal and >1cm (1.6cm, not shown). (e) Transverse grayscale image through the bony pelvis at the level of the lumbosacral junction reveals posterior rotation of the iliac bones, resulting in an abnormally increased iliac wing angle
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
ba
dc
39
e
40
ab
cd
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Fig. 4.4 US ndings of the abnormal external genitalia and irregular bladder mucosa in classic bladder exstrophy at 19weeks gestation. (a) Transverse grayscale image of the external genitalia reveals an abnormal ambiguous appearance of the genitalia (circle). (b) Sagittal grayscale image through the lower abdomen demonstrates a ventral wall defect between the abdominal cord inser­tion (ACI) and external genitalia (closed arrows). The defect has a lobulated and irregular surface (open arrows). (c) Transverse grayscale image of the infraumbilical defect further illustrates the irregular contour of the defect (open arrows), corresponding to the inamed bladder mucosa. (d) Postnatal photograph reveals the lobulated exposed bladder mucosa (between open arrows) and abnormal male external genitalia with epispadias (circle)
ab
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
Fig. 4.5 Classic bladder exstrophy with ultrasound ndings mimicking a bowel-containing omphalocele at 27weeks gestation. (a) Transverse grayscale image of the abdomen demonstrates a protruding ventral wall defect containing non-dilated bowel (arrowheads). (b) Sagittal grayscale image reveals that the ventral wall defect (arrowheads) is infraumbilical and immediately below the ACI (arrow) and cephalad to the external genitalia (open arrowhead). The infraumbilical loca­tion and absence of a uid-lled bladder on other images (not shown) are consistent with bladder exstrophy with a protruding bladder plate rather than an omphalocele
41

Cloacal Exstrophy

Cloacal exstrophy represents a more severe constellation of urogenital and gastroin­testinal malformations and is considered by many to represent the most severe clini­cal entity on the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex spectrum [11, 12]. In addition to bladder exstrophy, an omphalocele, imperforate anus, and spine abnor­mality are classically present, leading to the acronym by which this entity is also known—omphalocele, bladder exstrophy, imperforate anus, and spine anomalies (OEIS) complex. The acronym OEIS was originally coined as a mnemonic for the typical anomalies seen in cloacal exstrophy [13], and the terms “cloacal exstrophy” and “OEIS complex” should be considered synonymous [14]. It is also important to recognize that not all four components of classic cloacal exstrophy need to be pres­ent for its diagnosis [15]. Indeed, in one series of cloacal exstrophy, only 22.6% had all four components (OEIS), 32.8% had cloacal exstrophy without spine abnormali­ties (OIE), and 18% had cloacal exstrophy without omphalocele (EIS) [15]. Therefore, when making a prenatal diagnosis of cloacal exstrophy, it is likely best to specify which individual components are present (e.g., “Cloacal exstrophy, char­acterized by …”), as this will help optimize prenatal counseling, delivery planning, and neonatal management [16].
42
ab
cd
E. R. Oliver and S. J. Back
Fig. 4.6 MRI ndings of classic bladder exstrophy at 22weeks gestation. (a) Transverse FSE T2-weighted image (TR/TE ms, 1100/84) through the lower abdomen just below the level of the umbilical cord insertion demonstrates the absence of a uid-lled bladder and a relatively small infraumbilical defect (arrowheads). (b) Sagittal SSFP image (TR/TE ms, 3.99/1.74) through the mid-abdomen demonstrates a ventral wall defect (arrowhead) located immediately below the level of a low ACI (black arrowhead) representing the exstrophied bladder. *, umbilical cord. (c) Transverse EPI image (TR/TE ms, 5841/50) through the lower bony pelvis demonstrates widening of the symphysis pubis (measured distance 1.2cm). (d) Sagittal T1-weighted gradient echo image (TR/TE ms, 202/4.76) through the lower abdomen and pelvis demonstrates a normal course of the T1-hyperintense meconium (arrows) extending to the perineum, arguing against the presence of an imperforate anus/anorectal malformation. A uid-lled bladder was not identied on any other sequences, and the constellation of ndings is consistent with classic bladder exstrophy
4 Prenatal and Postnatal Imaging of the Bladder Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex
43
a
b
c
Fig. 4.7 MRI ndings of classic bladder exstrophy at 21weeks gestation (same case as Fig. 4.2). (a) Transverse FSE T2-weighted image (TR/TE ms, 1100/76) through the lower abdomen just below the level of the umbilical cord insertion demonstrates the absence of a uid-lled bladder and a relatively small infraumbilical defect (arrowheads) protruding between the adducted legs. (b) Sagittal SSFP image (TR/TE ms, 4.18/1.92) through the mid-abdomen demonstrates a ventral wall defect (arrowhead) that was immediately below the level of the ACI (not shown) representing the exstrophied bladder and cephalad to the external genitalia (open arrowhead). (c) Sagittal T1-weighted gradient echo image (TR/TE ms, 209/4.76) through the lower abdomen and pelvis demonstrates a normal course of the T1-hyperintense meconium (arrows) extending to the perineum, which argues against imperforate anus/anorectal malformation. A uid-lled bladder was not identied on any other sequences, and the ndings are consistent with classic bladder exstrophy