Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4446_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
39 Neoplasms oftheLarynx andLaryngopharynx
455
in assessment of cartilage and tongue base involvement, paraglottic and preepiglottic space extension of tumour. MRI is also more useful in the detection of recurrent carcinoma [13].
A chest X-ray is done to screen for distant metastasis, while a CT chest is indicated in patients with advanced stage tumours to evaluate the mediastinum and detect second primary tumours. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is not routinely used in the evaluation and treatment planning of early cases, and its role is increased in the staging of more advanced can­cers [14]. Surgery and radiation therapy change the normal laryngeal anatomy and may cause oedema, brosis and scarring making diagnosis of recurrent carcinoma with CT or MRI more dif­cult. PET scan is valuable in posttherapy moni­toring, distinguishing recurrence from these alterations. It is done at least 3months following completion of treatment. PET/CT combines PET and CT into one scanner, with fusion of anatomic and metabolic data higher diagnostic accuracy is provided [7].
Pretreatment endoscopy under anaesthesia, with the use of microscopic and endoscopic tech­niques, is recommended in all patients. Endoscopic evaluation with 0, 30, and 70° tele­scopes provide better inspection of the anterior commissure, ventricles and the subglottis. Paralysis of the cord is differentiated from arytenoids xation by palpation and manipula­tion of the arytenoid cartilage. In laryngopharyn­geal cancer bilateral pyriform fossae, lateral and posterior walls of the laryngopharynx, and the postcricoid region are examined. The distal extent of tumour should be determined, if the endoscope can be passed through the tumour; the rest of the oesophagus is examined to rule out the presence of synchronous tumours. Bronchoscopy may be performed to detect the presence of tra­cheal invasion [12].
Biopsy is needed to conrm the diagnosis because the gross appearance of sarcoidosis or Wegener granulomatosis can mimic advanced carcinoma. Deep biopsies obtained from the tumour should reach stroma or muscle to diag­nose an invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Small lesions are completely excised with a small cuff
of normal appearing submucosa to detect the depth of invasion. Biopsy is recommended for any other suspicious area discovered during endoscopy [7]. To avoid a tracheostomy, that could lead to tumour seeding and stomal recur­rence, laser is used to debulk large tumours par­tially obstructing the airway.
39.4 Treatment ofEarly Cancer Larynx
Treatment of early cancer larynx should aim to completely remove the tumour, prevent recur­rence and preserve laryngeal function by a single modality with the least morbidity. Treatment options include radiotherapy, transoral laser microsurgery or open surgery. The choice of treatment should be made depending on tumour primary site, extension and accessibility, sur­geon’s experience as well as patient’s lifestyle and preference.
39.4.1 Treatment ofEarly Glottic Cancer
Early glottic cancer refers to tumours ranging from Tis to T2 lesions. Transoral laser microsur­gery has become an established treatment modal­ity for early glottic cancer larynx [15]. It is associated with minimal bleeding, absence of post-operative oedema, less patient morbidity, short hospital stay, high local control rates, pres­ervation of function and excellent re-treatment options for local failure. Tracheostomy is rarely required. The tumour is transected and removed piecemeal; this allows for exposure of the dissec­tion plane and precise visualization of the inter­face between tumour and the underlying normal tissue. Using the magnication and good illumi­nation of the operating microscope makes this feasible. Obtaining an adequate surgical expo­sure of anterior commissure lesions in endo­scopic laser surgery is difcult but not impossible [16]. In case of suspected cartilage involvement, endoscopic cartilage resection may be performed but is technically challenging. Combined laser
456
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
I. Zohdi et al.
endoscopic and open technique may be a better alternative treatment choice. Extent of voice affection after surgery depends on the depth of resection. If limited to the supercial layer of the lamina propria and the vocal ligament resection usually results in near normal voice production. Resections extending to the vocalis muscle can cause post-operative phonatory function decits. After a post-operative period of total voice rest to facilitate healing, patients require voice therapy to maximize voice outcome. If needed recon­struction after endoscopic laser surgery is per­formed by augmentation using cordal injection or medialization thyroplasty [17].
Radiation therapy and conservation surgery are almost equally effective treatments for early glottic carcinoma. Endoscopic laser resection is recommended over radiation therapy for the well-dened supercial lesion located in the mid­dle third of the vocal cord. Because the surgical management of larger lesions requires the removal of greater amounts of tissue, radiation is usually the preferred initial treatment for those tumours. Older patients with greater comorbidity are selected for radiation therapy. Primary stan­dard radiation therapy is delivered at 2Gy per fraction per day, 5days a week over 7weeks for a total dose of 70Gy. It produces a control rate of 85–95% for T1 tumours, 70–80% for T2 tumours, and an ultimate local control rate including salvage laryngectomy of up to 100%. Radiotherapy, however, is a time-consuming pro­cedure necessitating several weeks; there is also a risk of radiogenic carcinoma specially in younger patients. Because the amount of normal tissue in the treatment port for early T1 or T2 glottic carci­noma is small, radiation for these lesions is asso­ciated with mild side effects. Voice disturbance may be a result of radiation induced mucositis, atrophic changes and brosis [18]. Continued smoking during treatment increases tissue sus­ceptibility to radiation injury.
Larger more inltrating T2 tumours with pos­terior extension or anterior commissure involve­ment may require open procedures, vertical hemilaryngectomy or supracricoid resection, that
have a greater local control rate. Patients usually need a temporary tracheostomy after open partial surgery. The vertical partial hemilaryngectomy includes resection of the corresponding thyroid ala along with tumour at the glottic level. Lesions involving the anterior commissure are treated with frontolateral hemilaryngectomy or supracri­coid laryngectomy. Frontolateral partial laryn­gectomy removes a vocal fold, anterior commissure, anterior third of the contralateral vocal fold, and the overlying medial thyroid car­tilage. Supracricoid laryngectomy involves resec­tion of both true and false vocal folds, the thyroid cartilage, both paraglottic spaces, and one partial or full arytenoid, but preserves at least one crico­arytenoid unit (arytenoid associated musculature, plus the superior and recurrent laryngeal nerve) and cricoid cartilage. Contraindications to this surgical procedure include bilateral arytenoid involvement, posterior commissure disease, hyoid bone involvement, and subglottic exten­sion beyond the upper margin of the cricoid ring. Reconstruction is performed with cricohyoido­epiglottopexy [19]. Supracricoid laryngectomy for T1b and T2 carcinomas results in high local control rates. It also plays an important role in the surgical salvage of selected radiation failures in patients in whom the recurrent tumour has not extended beyond its original site.
39.4.2 Treatment ofEarly Supraglottic Cancer
Early supraglottic cancer refers to tumours rang­ing from T1 to T2 lesions. The treatment options for early supraglottic lesions include radiother­apy, supraglottic laryngectomy (open or tran­soral laser microsurgery) or supracricoid laryngectomy. Patients with T1–2 lesions have a 20–30% incidence of occult nodal metastasis and a higher frank nodal disease at presentation. It carries therefore a somewhat poorer prognosis than glottic cancer. For early supraglottic tumours, the clinically N0 neck needs to be addressed due to the high risk of microscopic
AL GRAWANY
39 Neoplasms oftheLarynx andLaryngopharynx
457
lymph node metastasis. Elective treatment of the neck is performed by either radiotherapy or selective neck dissection (unilateral or bilateral) depending on the initial line of treatment [20]. The general recommendation is to irradiate patients with T1 and small exophytic T2 lesions, as well as patients with poor pulmonary func­tion, with poor access for surgery or high risk for general anaesthesia. The target volume for radiation treatment includes the primary tumour and lymph nodes bilaterally (Level II–IV).
In a supraglottic laryngectomy, the larynx is resected between the preepiglottic space and the ventricles, with preservation of both true vocal folds and both arytenoids. Tumour extension below the laryngeal ventricle and substantial car­tilage involvement contraindicates this surgical procedure. Swallowing can be temporary affected with variable degrees of aspiration. Dietary mod­ications and compensatory techniques as Mendelsohn manoeuvre, supraglottic swallow and effortful swallow can be used to improve swallowing. Patients indicated for supraglottic partial laryngectomy require adequate pulmo­nary reserve. Advance aged patients are poor can­didates for this procedure [21].
Endoscopic laser resection of supraglottic tumours is recently gaining more ground.
Patients complain of less post-operative dys­phagia and rapidly recover normal swallowing. This improved outcome and better functional recovery of swallowing in contrast to open supra­glottic laryngectomy are mostly due to the preservation of the superior laryngeal nerve [22]. Patients with trismus, projecting teeth or cervical spine deformity are not suitable for endoscopic laser resection. Inserting the largest possible laryngoscope or bivalved laryngoscope into the patient increases the visibility and accessibility of these tumours to transoral excision. The local control rates with laser excision appear to be equal to open procedures for T1 and T2 lesions. Extended procedures may include resection of the tongue base, arytenoid, aryepiglottic fold, or superior medial pyriform wall. Transoral robotic surgery has emerged as a new, safe, useful proce-
dure in the management of supraglottic tumours [23]. Advantages of robotic surgery include improved optics, three-dimensional viewing, increased instrument freedom of motion and modulating tremor. A supraglottic partial laryn­gectomy is feasible in selected patients, with early supraglottic cancer, who have failed initial treatment with radiotherapy. Supracricoid laryn­gectomy with cricohyoidopexy is used for selected T2 supraglottic carcinomas that have extension from the supraglottis to the glottic level.
Key Points
• Early laryngeal cancer can be treated with single modality.
• Treatment options include radiotherapy, transoral laser microsurgery or open surgery.
• Endoscopic laser resection is recently gaining more ground.
• To maximize voice outcome, recon­struction may be needed.
• Treatment of the neck for occult meta­static disease must be considered for early supraglottic cancer.
39.5 Treatment ofSubglottic Carcinoma
Early subglottic carcinoma is treated with radia­tion therapy. More advanced disease is treated by total laryngectomy with bilateral paratracheal node dissection, and ipsilateral or total thyroidec­tomy and adjuvant post-operative radiation or chemoradiation therapy if indicated.
39.6 Treatment ofAdvanced Cancer Larynx
Advanced laryngeal carcinoma (T3–4) carry long-term survival rates ranging from 30 to 60% depending on the site and stage of the tumour.
458
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
I. Zohdi et al.
They were treated with total laryngectomy and adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation therapy. Some cases of T3 glottic or supraglottic cancers can be treated by endoscopic resection, but these patients need thorough preoperative evaluation and strict post-operative follow-up. Supraglottic cancers staged as T3 (invasion of the preepiglot­tic space with intact ventricles and vocal folds) can be treated by open supraglottic laryngectomy with resection of the hyoid bone. The supracri­coid laryngectomy plays an important role in treatment of some selected advanced tumours (T3 or early T4) and early postradiotherapy fail­ure. This is achieved with preserving physiologic speech, and respiration without the need for a permanent tracheostoma. In supraglottic tumours, with paraglottic space invasion causing vocal cord xation, supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy may be the alternative to total laryngectomy. Glottic tumours with supraglottic extension can be treated by supracricoid laryn­gectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy [19]. The high local control rate of this procedure is achieved by the wide resection of the paraglottic space, the thyroid cartilage and inferior portion of the preepiglottic space.
Radiation therapy alone is used if patients are medically unt to undergo surgery. It results in lower local control rates, and many patients may need total laryngectomy for salvage. Side effects from radiation increase with larger elds, as in patients requiring extensive nodal irradiation. It may be associated with severe acute and long­term side effects, such as skin problems, dry mouth, mucositis, difcult swallowing, tooth decay, chondronecrosis, hypothyroidism, oesophageal stricture and oedema requiring tra­cheostomy in some cases. Using radiation ther­apy causes difculty in detecting local recurrence due to laryngeal oedema, and increased post­operative complications if surgery is required for salvage. Radiation efcacy is improved with accelerated and hyperfractionated schemes. Intensity modulated radiation therapy uses advanced technology to provide higher target volume and to minimize the dose delivered to surrounding structures such as the spinal cord,
salivary glands, and swallowing apparatus hence limiting the side effects of treatment [24].
Due to the discouraging outcomes of treating advanced laryngeal carcinoma with radiotherapy alone, chemoradiation began to be used. Organ preservation strategies using chemoradiation pro­tocols is now the standard treatment option for most T3 and T4a tumours without extensive car­tilage invasion. A major advantage of chemora­diation is the synergistic effect on the tumour and the eradication of micrometastases. Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-uorouracil is evaluated after 2 or 3cycles by CT or MRI with contrast. In cases of complete response or partial response with tumour size reduction to 50% or more, denitive radiotherapy is given. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy allows preservation of the larynx in over 60% of patients. In case there is no response or insignicant reduction of tumour size the patient is subjected to surgery. Concurrent radiation ther­apy and cisplatin 100mg/m2 on days 1, 22 and 43 achieves higher rates of organ preservation and better loco-regional control compared to radia­tion therapy alone or induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy. Chemotherapy is better tolerated when given sequentially than concurrently with radiotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiation has been associated with acute and long-term toxicity [24].
Patients with more advanced laryngeal carci­noma, with bulky tumours, destruction of the thy­roid or cricoid cartilage, penetration through the cartilage, extralaryngeal soft tissue spread and extension beyond the posterior third of the base of tongue are treated by total laryngectomy [25]. Indications for post-operative radiation or chemo­radiation therapy include close or positive mar­gins, extracapsular extension, multiple positive nodes, invasion of the soft tissues of the neck, perineural invasion and vascular spread. It should start within 6 weeks of surgery [26]. Using chemoradiation protocols alone in these more advanced cases results in poor functional preser­vation, high failure rates and increased post­operative complications if surgery is required for salvage.
AL GRAWANY
39 Neoplasms oftheLarynx andLaryngopharynx
Fig. 39.4 Diagram
showing the extent of resection in different types of laryngectomy. (1) Horizontal partial laryngectomy (supraglottic laryngectomy), (2) Supracricoid laryngectomy, (3) Total laryngectomy
459
12 3
In total laryngectomy the larynx is resected from the vallecula to the upper trachea, including the vocal folds, hyoid bone, epiglottis, thyroid and cricoid cartilages and a few tracheal cartilage rings (Figs.39.4 and 39.5). Parts of the pharyn­geal mucosa of pyriform sinus or lateral pharyn­geal wall are resected ensuring adequate resection margins but enough mucosa should be preserved for later closure. The airway is interrupted, and patients respirate through a tracheal stoma. Post­laryngectomy rehabilitation is required to achieve intelligible speech and restore swallowing func­tion and oral feeding. Post-laryngectomy patients communicate by oesophageal speech, articial larynx, or creation of a tracheoesophageal stula with insertion of vocal prosthesis. The voice
Fig. 39.5 Specimen of total laryngectomy (the cricoid
lamina is incised showing advanced tumour in the left glottic area)
460
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
I. Zohdi et al.
prosthesis allows air from the lungs to pass into a narrow pharyngoesophageal segment that vibrates to produce sound. Tracheoesophageal speech is now the preferred form of voice reha­bilitation as it achieves longer phonation time, greater volume and better intelligibility [27].
Results of treatment in advanced laryngeal cancer patients are affected by the presence of cervical lymph node metastases, which may amount to an overall 30% incidence of occult neck metastasis. There is an inverse relation between the extent of neck disease and ultimate local control. Patients with supraglottic and advanced glottic cancer with N0 necks should undergo elective treatment of the neck by either neck dissection or radiotherapy. In supraglottic tumours, with more incidence of bilateral neck metastasis, necks should be bilaterally managed. The option of treatment of the primary decides the method used to treat the neck. If surgery is chosen for the primary tumour, neck dissection should include levels II, III and IV (Fig.39.6). Patients with N1 involvement with a complete clinical response after chemoradiation should be closely observed. Those with incomplete clinical response require neck dissection. A planned neck dissection is recommended for patients with N2 disease or greater, regardless of response to chemoradiotherapy [28].
Treating patients with combined modalities have improved local-regional control, but overall
Fig. 39.6 Specimen of total laryngectomy with left
selective and right radical neck dissection (back view)
survival has remained unchanged as result of dis­tant metastases and second primary tumours. Overall, local and regional failures after treat­ment occur in about 30% of patients, and distant metastases in 10–30% of patients depending on cancer location. About 50% of patients die of second primary tumours or other intercurrent illness.
Follow-up care after laryngeal cancer treat­ment is mandatory, it includes regular physical examinations and medical tests. Follow-up visits aim to detect recurring cancer or second primary cancer and manage late side effects of treatment. A common follow-up schedule after treatment is every 2months for the rst year, every 3months for the second year, every 4months for the third year, every 6months for the fourth and fth year, and once a year after that. It is important to iden­tify early recurrence and start salvage treatment before the disease reaches more advanced stages. PET/CT scan may be used for surveillance purposes. It gained a role in the detection of local and regional recurrences, even if CT and MRI fail to diagnose them [7].
Surgery remains the gold standard treatment in loco-regional recurrence. Salvage surgery is mostly performed by total laryngectomy. Supracricoid laryngectomy is an appropriate treatment option in selected patients, in whom the recurrent tumour has not extended beyond its original site.
Patients radiologically staged N0 by CT imag­ing are not submitted to neck dissection, as they most probably are free from occult neck metasta­ses. Post-operative complication rates reach more than 50%, pharyngocutaneous stula being the most encountered local complication [
29].
Chemotherapy or chemoradiation may be used, especially if surgery is not amenable, to help con­trol local and distant disease. Immunotherapy is recently under trial among some cases. Palliative care is interdisciplinary care that provides sup­port for the physical and psychological suffering of patients.
AL GRAWANY
39 Neoplasms oftheLarynx andLaryngopharynx
Key Points
• Advanced cancer larynx is treated with combined modality, either surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy or initial chemoradiation.
• Laryngeal cartilage penetration is an indication for laryngectomy.
• Tracheoesophageal speech is now the preferred form of voice rehabilitation.
• Treatment of the neck for palpable or occult metastatic disease is indicated for all advanced laryngeal cancer.
39.7 Treatment ofLaryngopharyngeal Carcinoma
Early stage laryngopharyngeal cancer may be managed with either surgery or radiotherapy with equally good results. Choice of treatment depends on site, inferior and superior extent, circumferen­tial involvement and laryngeal spread of the tumour [30]. Surgical procedures include open partial pharyngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy and transoral laser surgery in conjunction with staged or synchronous neck dissection. Transoral robotic surgery that aims at less invasiveness and functional preservation is becoming popular. Radiotherapy is usually the treatment of choice in patients who are medically unt or cannot toler­ate early post-operative aspiration and in early lesions involving pyriform sinus apex or postcri­coid region.
Tumours of the laryngopharynx with gross thyroid cartilage destruction, advanced tumours of the postcricoid region or of the pharyngeal wall with circumferential involvement are man­aged with total pharyngolaryngectomy along with uni- or bilateral selective neck dissection with the removal of levels II–IV lymph nodes. The presence of cervical nodal metastasis requires modied radical neck dissection. Extension into the oesophagus necessitates pharyngo- oesophagectomy, paraesophageal and
461
paratracheal lymph node dissection with hemithyroidectomy. Laryngopharyngeal cancer patients commonly suffer from malnutrition increasing the risk of post-operative complica­tions. Complete resection of the tumour is fol­lowed by appropriate reconstruction and post-operative adjuvant treatment. Prevertebral musculature or cervical spine involvement, mas­sive mediastinal nodal enlargement and carotid artery involvement are contraindications to sur­gery [31].
Reconstruction after resection of tumours ensures proper wound healing and recovery of swallowing function. After partial pharyngec­tomy for tumours limited to the pyriform fossa, the pectoralis major myocutaneous ap is applied as a patch repair to reconstruct the pharynx. For reconstruction of circumferential pharyngectomy defects free ap surgery, as tubed skin aps and visceral aps, is performed by microvascular sur­gical technique. The tubed radial forearm fascio­cutaneous free ap is reliable due to the large vascular pedicle calibre. Microvascular anasto­mosis is performed under magnication to suit­able recipient vessels in the neck. Ease of harvest, immediate reconstruction, limited donor site morbidity, radiation tolerance, high ap reliability and good swallowing outcome are all advantages of the radial forearm free ap [32]. The free jeju­nal ap is harvested through an upper midline laparotomy and transferred to the neck. The advantages of using visceral aps include lower incidence of pharyngocutaneous stula and stric­ture formation at the site of anastomosis [33]. After pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy the stom­ach, fashioned into tube-like conguration, is pulled up through the retrosternal plane to the neck and anastomosed to the oropharynx. Laparoscopic gastric pull-up is recently indicated to minimize the morbidity of the open technique. In cases when gastric pull-up is not feasible, ped­icled jejunum or colonic interposition is used.
Combined chemoradiotherapy has become now the standard of care for a vast majority of patients with advanced laryngopharyngeal can­cer, among them are also patients, who are unt
462
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
for or refuse surgery. This treatment modality achieves organ preservation without compro­mising survival. Surgery for laryngopharyngeal cancer is on the retreat. In very advanced lesions T4b, not amenable for resection, chemoradia­tion is the only option. Intention of this treat­ment is mostly palliative. Combined modality therapies include concurrent chemoradiother­apy, induction chemotherapy followed by radio­therapy and sequential therapy with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemora­diotherapy [31].
Despite some improvement inlocal and func­tional outcomes with the advent of organ laryn­geal preservation, overall survival for patients with laryngopharynx cancer remains poor. The average rates lies between 25 and 40% 5 years survival. Prognosis is considered to be the worst among all head and neck sites. Up to 95% of all recurrences occur in the rst 36months and over half of the rst recurrences are distant metastases.
Key Points
• In early laryngopharyngeal cancer, tran­soral laser microsurgery and robotic sur­gery show good oncological benets.
• In advanced cases, organ preservation by chemoradiation took ground from surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation.
• Radical surgery (pharyngolaryngec­tomy) has a role in the non-functioning larynx, in advanced volume disease and in salvage surgery.
• Treatment of the neck is determined according to tumour location and neck stage.
I. Zohdi et al.
Take Home Messages
• True benign tumours constitute 5% or less of all laryngeal tumours. The most common benign tumour of the larynx is papilloma.
• Hoarseness lasting longer than 3weeks and persistent odynophagia or dyspha­gia in elderly patients are warning symptoms suggesting cancer, and should be thoroughly investigated.
• Preoperative evaluation is essential for planning treatment; it includes history, examination, endoscopy and imaging.
• Early laryngeal and laryngopharyngeal cancer can be treated with single modal­ity either conservation surgery or radiotherapy.
• Laryngopharyngeal carcinomas have a worse prognosis, as most of the patients have advanced stage disease when rst diagnosed.
• Organ preservation strategies using chemoradiation protocols is now the standard treatment option for a vast majority of patients with advanced laryngeal and laryngopharyngeal cancer.
• Treatment of the neck for palpable or occult metastatic disease must be con­sidered for all supraglottic, laryngo­pharyngeal and advanced laryngeal cancer.
• Follow-up care after cancer treatment is mandatory, salvage treatment is less successful once the disease reaches the advanced stages.
• Surgery remains the gold standard treat­ment inloco-regional recurrence.
AL GRAWANY
39 Neoplasms oftheLarynx andLaryngopharynx
463
References
1. Stamataki S, Nikolopoulos TP, Korres S, Felekis D, Tzangaroulakis A, Ferekidis E. Juvenile recur­rent respiratory papillomatosis: still a mystery disease with difcult management. Head Neck. 2007;29(2):155–62.
2. Bajaj Y, Kapoor K, Ifeacho S, et al. Great Ormond Street Hospital treatment guidelines for use of pro­pranolol in infantile isolated subglottic haemangioma. JLaryngolOtol. 2013;127(3):295–8.
3. Sataloff RT, Ressue JC, Portell M, Harris RM, Ossoff R, Merati AL, etal. Granular cell tumours of the lar­ynx. J Voice. 2000;14(1):119–34.
4. Naik S, Shenoy A, Chavan P, Patil A, Gupta S. Laryngeal paraganglioma. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(Suppl 1):95–104.
5. Devaney K, Ferlito A, Silver CE. Cartilaginous tumours of the larynx. Ann Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;104:251.
6. Tibbetts K, Than M. Role of advanced laryngeal imaging in glottic cancer. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2015;48:565–84.
7. Chu E, Kim Y. Laryngeal cancer: diagnosis and preoperative work-up. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2008;41:673–95.
8. Hoffman H, Karnell L, Shah J, Ariyan S, Brown G, Fee W. Hypopharyngeal cancer patient care evalua­tion. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:1005–17.
9. Thekdi AA, Ferris RL. Diagnostic assessment of laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002;35(5):953–69.
10. Mor N, Blitzer A.Functional anatomy and oncologic barriers of the larynx. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48:533–45.
11. Tufano R, Stafford E. Organ preservation surgery for laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41:953–69.
12. Piazza C, Paderno A, Ravanelli M, Pessina C.Clinical and radiological evaluation of hypopharyngeal carci­noma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:35–46.
13. Blitz A, Aygun N. Radiologic evaluation of larynx cancer. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2008;41:697–713.
14. Isles MG, McConkey C, Mehanna HM. A system­atic review and meta-analysis of the role of PET in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carci­noma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. ClinOtolaryngol. 2008;33:210–22.
15. Gallo A, Vincentiis M, Manciocco V, Simonelli M, Fiorella M, Shah J. CO2 laser cordectomy for early-stage glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:370–4.
16. Steiner W, Ambrosch P, Rodel R, Kron M.Impact of anterior commissure involvement on local control of early glottic carcinoma treated by laser microresec­tion. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1485–91.
17. Zeitels S. Optimizing voice after endoscopic par­tial laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004;37:627–36.
18. Wedman J, Heimdal JH, Elstad I, Olofsson J.Voice results in patients with T1a glottic cancer treated by radiotherapy or endoscopic measures. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;259:547–50.
19. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99:421–6.
20. Redaelli de Zinis LO, Nicolai P, Tomenzoli D, etal. The distribution of lymph node metastases in supra­glottic squamous cell carcinoma: therapeutic implica­tions. Head Neck. 2002;24(10):913–20.
21. Peretti G, Piazza C, Cattaneo A, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes after endoscopic versus open neck supraglottic laryngectomies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:827–32.
22. Sasaki CT, Leder SB, Acton LM, etal. Comparison of the glottic closure reex in traditional “open” versus endoscopic laser supraglottic laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:93–6.
23. Smith R.Transoral robotic surgery for larynx cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2014;47:379–95.
24. Lee N, O’Meara W, Chan K, et al. Concurrent che­motherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced laryngeal and hypo­pharyngeal cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:459–68.
25. Agrawal N, Goldenberg D. Primary and sal­vage total laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2008;41:771–80.
26. De Stefani A, Magnano M, Cavalot A, etal. Adjuvant radiotherapy inuences the survival of patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck who have poor prognoses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(5):630–6.
27. Kao WW, Mohr RM, Kimmel CA, etal. The outcome and techniques of primary and secondary tracheo­esophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(3):301–7.
28. Ferlito A, Silverb C, Rinaldoa A, Smith R. Surgical treatment of the neck in cancer of the larynx. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2000;62:217–25.
29. Holsinger FC, Funk E, Roberts DB, etal. Conservation laryngeal surgery versus total laryngectomy for radiation failure in laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2006;28:779–84.
30. Eckel H, Bradley P.Treatment options for hypopharyn­geal cancer. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:47–53.
31. Habib A.Management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma: systematic review of survival following surgical and non-surgical treatments. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:385–400.
32. Scharpf J, Esclamado R. Reconstruction with radial forearm aps after ablative surgery for hypopharyn­geal cancer. Head Neck. 2003;3:261–6.
33. Wei W, Chan J.Surgical treatment of advanced staged hypopharyngeal cancer. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:66–75.
Cancer oftheNasal Cavity
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
andParanasal Sinuses
AhmedEldaly, MohammedHassab, andAliAl Ansari
40
40.1 Introduction
Cancers of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are rare. They comprise about 3% of head and neck malignancies and less than 1% of all human malignancies [1]. The estimated annual incidence is about 0.56–1:100,000 of population. The male–female ratio is about 2:1 with an average age at presentation between 50 to 60years [2].
The maxillary sinus is the most common site of origin (55%) followed by the nasal cavity (23%) and the ethmoid sinus (20%) [3]. Primary tumors of the sphenoid and the frontal sinus are exceedingly rare. However, extension of parana­sal sinus malignancies to involve the sphenoid and frontal sinuses occurs frequently because of the anatomic contiguity of the paranasal sinuses and because a signicant number of tumors may involve more than one site at the time of initial diagnosis making it difcult to ascertain the pri­mary site of origin.
A. Eldaly · M. Hassab (*) Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alexandria, Tharwat, Alexandria, Egypt
A. Al Ansari Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
40.2 Pathology andBiology
Paranasal sinus malignancies include a heteroge­neous group of tumors with widely varying his­tology and prognosis. The World Health Organization classication of tumors includes more than 40 unique histopathological types for malignancies of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses [4].
These etiologies are broadly subclassied into epithelial or nonepithelial malignancies. Epithelial neoplasms constituted more than two­thirds of all malignant neoplasms in the sinonasal tract [5].
The distribution of those tumors varies from one geographical region to another however globally; Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and glandular malignancies are the most common epithelial tumors whereas rhabdomyosarcoma and lymphomas are well-known nonepithelial tumors that occur in this region.
Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the sinonasal tract occurring with a frequency between 36% and 58% of all parana­sal sinus cancers. These tumors have a peak inci­dence between 60 to 70years of age and occur more commonly in males [6].
The maxilla is the most common site of origin within the sinonasal region followed by the nasal cavity and the ethmoids [7, 8]. Associations between the development of paranasal SCC and working in nickel rening industry have been
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 A. Al-Qahtani et al. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Otolaryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_40
AL GRAWANY
465