Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4446_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
324
(a) Optic nerve compression, retrobulbar
hematoma, blindness, diplopia, epiphora
6. Intracranial infections
(a) Meningitis, cerebritis
• Most signicant complication
• Life-threatening
7. Cerebrospinal uid leak
(a) Prevented by achieving watertight
closure
(b) Vascularized intranasal or locoregional
ap
(c) Use of lumbar drain dependent on sur-
geon- and institution-specic variables
8. Intracranial complications
(a) Stroke
(b) Pneumocephalus
• Occurs from trapped air that enters into
nasal cavity from sinonasal tract
• High risk of brain herniation
• Treat with emergent aspiration, reexploration to identify and repair communication between sinonasal cavity
and brain
9. Neurologic complications
(a) Hypesthesia, paresthesia, seizure,
anosmia
Take Home Messages
• Malignant tumors of the sinonasal cav-
ity represent less than 1% of all cancers,
and about 3% of cancers of the upper
aerodigestive tract.
• Sinonasal tumors can be a diagnostic
challenge because they present with
symptoms that mimic common inammatory sinonasal disease.
• CT and MRI can complement each
other in determining vascular anatomy,
bony erosion into the orbit or skull base,
as well as meningeal involvement and
perineural spread of tumor.
• Surgical resection of sinonasal masses
can involve an interdisciplinary team
with multiple endoscopic and open
approaches available.
A. Tassler et al.
• Sinonasal malignancies generally
require multimodality therapy for adequate treatment.
• Complications from sinonasal tumor
treatment can include epistaxis, optic
nerve compression, cerebrospinal uid
leak, stroke, pneumocephalus, hypoesthesia/paresthesias, or tumor
recurrence.
Recommended Readings
1. Weymuller EA, Davis GE.Malignancies of the paranasal sinus. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V,
Niparko JK, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, Lesperance
MM, editors. Cummings otolaryngology head and
neck surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders;
2010. p.1121–32.
2. Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P. Benign tumors of the
sinonasal tract. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V,
Niparko JK, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, Lesperance
MM, editors. Cummings otolaryngology head and
neck surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders;
2010. p.717–27.
3. Virk JS, Chan J, Dimitrov L, Williamson A, Sandison
A, Weir J, Clarke P.Sinonasal cancer: an overview of
the emerging subtypes. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;12:1–6.
4. López F, Lund VJ, Suárez C, Snyderman CH, Saba
NF, Robbins KT, Vander Poorten V, Strojan P,
Mendenhall WM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. The impact
of histologic phenotype in the treatment of sinonasal
cancer. Adv Ther. 2017;34(10):2181–98.
5. Llorente JL, López F, Suárez C, Hermsen
MA. Sinonasal carcinoma: clinical, pathological,
genetic and therapeutic advances. Nat Rev Clin
Oncol. 2014;11(8):460–72.
6. Turner JH, Reh DD. Incidence and survival in
patients with sinonasal cancer: a historical analysis of
population- based data. Head Neck. 2012;34(6):877–
85, 877.
7. Sanghvi S, Khan MN, Patel NR, Yeldandi S, Baredes
S, Eloy JA. Epidemiology of sinonasal squamous
cell carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of 4994
patients. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(1):76–83.
8. Choussy O, Ferron C, Védrine PO, Toussaint B,
Liétin B, Marandas P, Babin E, De Raucourt D, Reyt
E, Cosmidis A, Makeiff M. Adenocarcinoma of ethmoid: a GETTEC retrospective multicenter study of
418 cases. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(3):437–43.
9. Kang JH, Cho SH, Kim JP, Kang KM, Cho KS,
Kim W, Seol YM, Lee S, Park HS, Hur WJ, Choi
YJ.Treatment outcomes between concurrent chemo-

28 Neoplasms oftheSinonasal Cavity
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
325
radiotherapy and combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy in stage III and IV maxillary
sinus cancer: multi-institutional retrospective analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(7):1717–23.
10. Robin TP, Jones BL, Gordon OM, Phan A, Abbott D,
McDermott JD, Goddard JA, Raben D, Lanning RM,
Karam SD. A comprehensive comparative analysis
of treatment modalities for sinonasal malignancies.
Cancer. 2017;123(16):3040–9.
11. Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Zanation A,
Prevedello D, Gardner P, Mintz A.Endoscopic skull
base surgery: principles of endonasal oncological surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(8):658–64.
12. Lund VJ, Howard D, Wei W, Spittle M.Olfactory neuroblastoma: past, present, and future? Laryngoscope.
2003;113(3):502–7.
13. Lu VM, Ravindran K, Phan K, Van Gompel JJ, Smith
TR, Donaldson AM, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Mekary
RA, Chaichana KL. Surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection for primary sinonasal
malignancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy.
2019;33(5):608–16.
14. Dong D, Wang Y, Li C, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Lai
J. Fibro-osseous lesions of paranasal sinus and craniofacial region: a retrospective study of 282 cases.
Laryngoscope. 2020;14
15. Lisan Q, Laccourreye O, Bonls P. Sinonasal
inverted papilloma: From diagnosis to treatment. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis.
2016;133(5):337–41.
16. López F, Triantafyllou A, Snyderman CH, Hunt JL,
Suárez C, Lund VJ, Strojan P, Saba NF, Nixon IJ,
Devaney KO, Alobid I.Nasal juvenile angiobroma:
current perspectives with emphasis on management.
Head Neck. 2017;39(5):1033–45.
AL GRAWANY

Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea
HamadAl Saey, AhmedShaikh, SaraAshkanani,
MansourAl Sulaiti, EmadAl Duhirat,
andShanmugamGanesan
29
29.1 Introduction
Cerebrospinal uid (CSF) rhinorrhea is result of
abnormal communication between subarachnoid
space and sinonasal cavities. It results from the
breakdown of layers separating the nasal cavity
from subarachnoid space. Rhinorrhea is a common rhinology complaint and should be differentiated from CSF leak.
H. Al Saey (*) · A. Shaikh · S. Ashkanani
M. Al Sulaiti · E. Al Duhirat · S. Ganesan
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Division,
Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation,
Doha, Qatar
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck
Surgery Division, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar,
Doha, Qatar
e-mail: Halsaey@hamad.qa;
sashkanani@hamad.qa; Malsulaiti1@hamad.qa;
EAlDuhirat@hamad.qa; sganesan@hamad.qa
Anatomy: CSF is ultraltrate of plasma which
contains electrolyte, glucose, and proteins. It is
present in the subarachnoid space helps in maintaining the hemostasis of neural tissue and maintains the chemical environment of brain. It is
produced by choroid plexus; the further ow is as
follows [1].
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
A. Al-Qahtani et al. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Otolaryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_29
327

328
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
H. Al Saey et al.
Choroid Plexus
Lateral Ventricles
Foramen of Monro
3rd Ventricles
Aqueduct of Sylvius
4th Ventricle
Foramen of Magendie and
Luschka
Subarachnoid Space
Reabsorption through
arachnoid Villi
Total Volume of CSF : 140 ml
Production: 0.33ml/ minute
Normal CSF pressure: 5 to 15 cm of H
Neurological Symptoms occur when ICP (intracranial pressure) > 15 to 20 cm of H
29.2 Aetiology
CSF rhinorrhea has been classied according to
the aetiology as follows [2]:
0
2
29.3 Diagnosis
Patients of CSF rhinorrhea present with unilateral watery discharge (90%) with salt or sweet
taste in the throat. Rhinorrhea is positional with
1. Posttraumatic: 80% of CSF leaks are from
nonsurgical head trauma, 2% of all head
trauma, 30% of all basilar skull base fractures
have CSF leak [3].
2. Iatrogenic: 16% of all leaks are from surgical
trauma [5].
increase in leaning forward or standing position
sometimes referred to as tea pot sign.
Other symptoms include headache, decrease
in vision, and sometimes dizziness and tinnitus.
Conrmation of CSF rhinorrhea can be done
by the following test.
3. Spontaneous: 14–46% of all cases of CSF rhinorrhea [6, 7].
4. Idiopathic.
• Ring sign: CSF combined with the blood leave
a ring sign or a halo sign. The nasal secretions
0
2
AL GRAWANY

29 Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea
329
mixed with blood when placed on lter paper
or bed sheets leave a central clearance of CSF
and peripheral blood termed as halo sign. This
is immediate indicator of CSF and gives a
clue, but reliability of this sign is poor [8].
• Glucose testing: Testing clear rhinorrhea for
glucose is a quick option for diagnosis; it was
traditionally considered that the glucose in the
nasal secretions is because of presence of
CSF. Recent studies have indicated that glucose is also present in 50% cases of acute viral
rhinitis, diabetes mellitus, and endotracheal
secretions of ICU patients. It has 80% specicity and low sensitivity [8].
• Beta-2 transferrin: Beta-2 transferrin is a glycoprotein that is present in CSF, but is not
detected in nasal secretions or surrounding tissue. It is used as a marker for CSF rhinorrhea.
It is detected by using immunoxation,
sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and isoelectric phoresis. It
has high sensitivity and high specicity.
Beta-2 transferrin is also present in vitreous
and perilymph [8, 9].
• Beta trace proteins: Similar to beta-2 transfer-
rin, beta trace protein is also present in high
concentration in CSF; it is produced by leptomeninges and choroid plexus. The reported
sensitivity and specicity of the test is 100%.
Bacterial meningitis and renal insufciency can
affect the level of beta trace proteins in CSF.
Once CSF leak has been conrmed, localiza-
tion of the leak is essential for preoperative
planning.
Radiological investigations are used for con-
rmation and localization of site of leak.
ing to determine which defect is denite source
of CSF leak. If only one osseous defect is identied and corresponds to clinical symptoms, then
no additional further imaging is needed to proceed surgery.
29.3.2 Computed Tomography
Cisternography [10]
CTC is performed by instilling intrathecal nonionic myelographic iodinated contrast (uorescein). Sinuses are scanned both in prone and
supine position. There is increase in >50
Hounseld units around the osseous defect in
positive study around site of leak (Fig.29.1).
When introduced in 1977, CTC was considered the study of choice to evaluate CSF stulae,
but it is now selectively used as a problem- solving
tool in specic scenarios, primarily in the setting
of multiple osseous defects on CT, to determine
the site of leak. CTC has a wide range of reported
sensitivities of 33–100% and specicity of
approximately 94% [10]. The main limitation of
CTC is that patients have to be actively leaking,
or able to elicit a leak, at the time of examination.
Low rates of sensitivity are predominantly attributed to imaging in the absence of an active leak,
with other potential causes being obscuration of
small leak in the setting of high-density contrast
media adjacent to high- density bone and high
viscosity of contrast media prohibiting leakage
through a stulous tract. The disadvantages of
CTC include high radiation dose related to multiple scans, inherent risk of a lumbar puncture,
and potential adverse outcome from iodinated
contrast.
29.3.1 High-Resolution Computed
Tomography (HRCT)
HRCT is rst choice for localization of site of
leak. It is best modality to delineate the osseous
anatomy for surgical planning. If patient has multiple osseous defects, then it becomes challeng-
29.3.3 Magnetic Resonance
Cisternogram
MRC is a common imaging modality used for
CSF leak diagnosis. It is a noninvasive study
capable of both leak conrmation and site localization by the inherent bright signal of CSF on

330
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 29.1 CT cisternography demonstrating the leak from lateral sphenoid recess (Sternberg’s canal horizontal arrow)
and cribriform plate (vertical arrow)
H. Al Saey et al.
T2-weighted images passing from intracranial
into paranasal sinuses, as well as by the identication of herniated soft tissue in skull base defects
[10].
Magnetic resonance (MR) cisternography
(MRC) is performed by acquiring heavily
T2-weighted (T2w) images to increase conspicuity of the contrast between CSF and the adjacent
skull base. The spatial resolution of HRCT is far
superior to that of MR imaging, but the advent of
thin-slice images that can be reformatted into
multiple planes signicantly improves MR imaging of the skull base. MRC should continue to be
used in conjunction with HRCT because MR
imaging cannot provide the exquisite osseous
detail of CT [10].
29.3.4 Radionuclide Cisternography
RNC is a nuclear medicine study in which a
radioisotope is injected intrathecally via lumbar
puncture, and pledgets are placed in the nasal
cavities for several hours at a time, then removed
and measured for radioactive tracer. This study
may be able to better detect a CSF leak that is too
slow or intermittent to produce a sufcient sample for beta-2 transferrin testing. It is an invasive
study, however, and therefore carries the potential risks inherent to any other lumbar puncture
with intrathecal injection. RNC is considered a
diagnostic or conrmatory study rather than a
localization study. The tracer may exit the skull
base at the location of the stula but contact the
pledget at a second separate site. In addition, it
cannot guarantee that the CSF is from a rhinologic leak and not an otologic leak that has traveled down the Eustachian tube into the
nasopharynx.
The available data indicate that this is a more
invasive, more expensive, and less accurate test
than beta-2 transferrin or beta trace protein.
Based on these facts, RNC should not be routinely employed to conrm the presence of a CSF
leak [10].
29.4 Spontaneous CSF Leaks
Spontaneous CSF leaks represent distinct group
of pathologies, by denition spontaneous leak is
dened as CSF rhinorrhea in absence of any preceding event. Most of these patients show clinical
signs and radiographic features of increased
intracranial pressure. Accurately diagnosing
patients with spontaneous CSF leaks is critical
for the successful repair of these patients because
multiple studies have identied increased ICP as
a negative risk factor for successful repair [6–8,
11]. Although repair of nasal CSF leaks using
AL GRAWANY

29 Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea
331
endoscopic techniques has high success rates,
patients with spontaneous CSF leaks have historically had a signicantly lower success rate.
There is strong correlation between the spontaneous leak and benign intracranial hypertension.
Patients are generally obese middle-aged
women who present with spontaneous clear rhinorrhea. The diagnosis is conrmed by beta-2
transferrin.
After diagnosing CSF rhinorrhea by beta-2
transferrin, next is localization of the skull base
defect and site of CSF stula. High-resolution
computed tomography (CT) is the initial radiographic test of choice, allowing for evaluation of
the bony integrity of the skull base and paranasal
sinuses. Patients with spontaneous CSF leaks
have characteristic CT ndings that support the
diagnosis. The bone of the skull base is broadly
attenuated and thin. Arachnoid pits secondary to
the bony impressions from the arachnoid villi in
the skull base are present in 63% of patients with
spontaneous CSF leaks. The most common sites
of skull base dehiscence are the lateral recess of
the sphenoid and the ethmoid roof. Pneumatization
of the lateral recess of the sphenoid is reported in
91% of patients with spontaneous CSF leaks, in
comparison with 23–43% in normal patients
[12]. Dehiscence of the ethmoid roof or cribriform plate is seen in 14% of patients with spontaneous CSF leaks [13]. The presence of multiple
skull base defects is common and may be present
in 31% of these patients.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful adjunct in the evaluation of patients with CSF
rhinorrhea. Patients with spontaneous CSF leaks
have the highest rate of meningoencephalocele
formation, ranging from 50 to 100% [1, 9]. MRI
is effective in assessing the contents of meningoencephalocele. Another benet of MRI in the
evaluation of patients with spontaneous CSF
leaks is the recognition of the empty sella. Empty
sella syndrome is a common radiographic nding
seen in both spontaneous CSF leaks and IIH [3,
4, 14]. Increased ICP are exerted on sites of
inherent structural weakness including the fascia
of the sellar diaphragm. The resulting herniation
of the meninges and CSF through the sellar diaphragm produces the appearance of an empty
sella on MRI.The presence of empty sella syndrome has been associated with both increased
ICP and spontaneous CSF leaks [9, 15, 16].
29.5 Traumatic CSF Rhinorrhea
Approximately 80% of CSF leaks result from
nonsurgical trauma, 16% from surgical procedures, and the remaining 4% are nontraumatic.
Of the traumatic leaks, more than 50% are evident within the rst 2days, 70% within the rst
week, and almost all present within the rst
3months. Delayed presentation may result from
wound contraction or scar formation, necrosis of
bony edges or soft tissue, slow resolution of
edema, devascularization of tissues, posttreatment tumor retraction, or progressive increases in
intracranial pressure (secondary to brain edema
or other process). As with most maxillofacial
trauma, traumatic CSF leaks occur most commonly in young males and complicate 2% of all
head traumas, and 12–30% of all basilar skull
fractures. Anterior skull base leaks are more
common than middle or posterior leaks, due to
the rm adherence of the dura to the anterior basilar skull. The most common sites of CSF rhinorrhea following accidental trauma are the sphenoid
sinus (30%), frontal sinus (30%), and ethmoid/
cribriform (23%), When looking at surgical
trauma, the most common sites of CSF leak following FESS are ethmoid/cribriform (80%), followed the frontal sinus (8%) and sphenoid sinus
(4%). After neurosurgical procedures, the most
common site of CSF leak is the sphenoid sinus
(67%) because of the high number of pituitary
tumors that are addressed via transsphenoidal
approach [17–19].
29.6 Management ofCSF Leaks
29.6.1 Conservative Management
Conservative treatment consists of strict bed rest
and elevation of the head at least 30°. In addition,
patients should be advised to refrain from coughing, sneezing, nose blowing, and straining or

332
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
H. Al Saey et al.
Valsalva maneuvers. Stool softeners are recommended, as well as antiemetics to avoid emesis or
retching, antitussives to avoid coughing, and
strict blood pressure management. The goal of
these measures is to reduce active ow through
the leak, reduce CSF pressure, and allow healing
of the defect to seal the leak, avoiding surgical
intervention; the overall rate of cessation with
conservative treatment was 39.5% when used for
3days. Resolution with conservative treatment of
CSF stulas involving temporal bone origin was
60%, whereas anterior skull base defects resolved
26.4% of the time with conservative treatment. If
conservative management is extended to 7days,
resolution rates improve to 85%.
29.6.2 Prophylactic Antibiotics
Cochrane Database review was performed to
address these deciencies. The analysis included
208 patients from four randomized controlled trials and an additional 2168 patients from 17 nonrandomized controlled trials. The analysis
concluded that the evidence does not support the
use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk
of meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures or basilar skull fractures with active CSF
leak. Analysis of both randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials failed to show a benet
or adverse effects of prophylactic antibiotic use
in patients with active CSF leak; therefore, the
current available literature suggests that prophylactic antibiotics do not decrease the risk of meningitis. It should be stated that perioperative
antibiotics are indicated for surgical repair of
CSF leaks, and in certain circumstances (such as
active bacterial rhinosinusitis or grossly contaminated tract leading to the intracranial cavity) antibiotic coverage is reasonable [4, 13, 20].
29.6.3 Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion
If there is persistence of the leak with conservative treatment, CSF diversion (most commonly
with a lumber drain but occasionally serial lumbar punctures) is pursued. Lumbar drains are pas-
sive devices yet they require active management.
Average drainage rates are around 10 mL per
hour. Optimal drainage lowers CSF pressure to
decompress the leak; however, if drainage is too
high, severe headaches and pneumocephalus may
result from drawing of air through the skull base
defect into the cranial vault. There is also the
added risk of meningitis. The benets are that the
addition of CSF diversion to conservative measures raises success rates to 70–90% with the
average duration of drainage being 6.5 days.
Another benet of this treatment is that it can be
performed at the bedside, even if patients are not
stable enough to go to the operating room.
Lumbar drains can also be used as an adjunctive
treatment to increase the success rates following
a variety of surgical repairs.
29.6.4 Surgical Management
Open intracranial approaches have historically
been used for CSF leak repair, but in recent
decades these have largely been replaced by
endonasal endoscopic approaches, given their
high success rate and lower morbidity prole.
Commonly utilized endoscopic repair techniques
for CSF leak are numerous, including free tissue
grafts, vascularized aps, and tissue sealants, as
well as various multilayer combinations of these
methods. Studies have shown that vascularized
aps are superior in the setting of large dural
defects or high-ow CSF leaks [7, 8]; otherwise,
implementation of a specic repair technique is
directed more by surgeon preference than by
evidence- based guidance.
29.6.5 Transcranial Approach
Although CSF rhinorrhea was initially described
in the seventeenth century, it was not until 1926
that Dand [21] reported the rst successful repair
by using a bifrontal craniotomy for access and a
fascia lata graft for repair. After craniotomy the
brain is retracted and the site of the defect is identied. Multiple tissues can be used for repair
including fascia lata grafts, muscle plugs, and
AL GRAWANY

29 Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea
333
pedicled galeal or pericranial aps. Tissue sealants, such as brin glue, can be used to hold the
graft in position; however, this will only last a
few weeks, leading the authors to prefer suture
closure to the dura distal to the defect, which
more securely holds the graft in place. Reported
success rates vary; however, recurrence rates as
high as 27% have been reported. The clear advantage of this approach is that it provides direct
access to the defect and allows for repair of multiple sites; however, with high reported failure
rates, the morbidity of a craniotomy, and brain
retraction (including potential hematoma, seizures, and anosmia), extracranial techniques are
now preferred in most circumstances. At present
these techniques are mostly used in patients who
require a craniotomy and exposure of the skull
base to treat associated intracranial pathology.
29.6.6 Endoscopic Repair
There are a variety of different graft materials
available for endoscopic repair of CSF leaks,
including fat, bone, allografts, free mucosal
grafts, and vascularized grafts, as well as glues or
sealants to secure these materials in place.
Following an extensive literature search on the
topic of endoscopic repair for CSF rhinorrhea,
the overall success rate ranges from 70 to 100%
on rst attempt and 86 to 100% on second for all
reported repair materials. Endoscopic techniques
have emerged as the preferred approach to the
repair of skull base defects since their initial
description by Wigand in 1981. This initial report
described repair of a defect encountered during
sinus surgery. In 1989, the rst report of the use
of rigid transnasal endoscopy for the endonasal
repair of CSF rhinorrhea was described.
Following identication and localization of the
skull base defect, standard endoscopic techniques
are used to expose the defect site. This approach
provides excellent exposure of the ethmoid roof,
cribriform plate, and the sphenoid sinus. The
choice of graft material has been a source of
debate for some time; however, based on a recent
meta-analysis, it appears that graft material does
not affect success rate as long as sound surgical
technique is used. Graft choices include temporalis fascia, fascia lata, muscle plugs, mucosal
grafts (with or without bone), autogenous fat,
free cartilage grafts (from the nasal septum or
auricle), and free bone grafts (from the nasal septum, calvarium, or iliac crest). For small defects,
free mucosal or free fascial grafts can be placed
in an overlay fashion.
Overlay, underlay, combined, and the obliteration techniques can be used for CSF closure.
Overlay grafts are placed over the defect and
these are outside the bony cranial cavity. The
underlay grafts could be of two types (these are
inside the bony cranial cavity). The epidural
underlay graft is between the bone and the dura
matter. The intradural underlay graft is placed in
the subdural space. The combined techniques can
be used. In a meta-analysis of the literature, both
techniques yielded similar results. In the epidural
underlay technique, the intact dura is separated
from the edge of the skull base defect to expose
an adequate buttress for the stabilization of the
graft. The free graft should be designed in such a
way that it can be pushed few millimeters
between the bone and the dura on all the sides of
the defect. Bone or cartilage underlay grafts are
advocated for large bony defects associated with
herniating brain or meninges. The inlay technique is technically more demanding than the
overlay technique. Inlay grafting is also suited to
repair defects of the posterior wall of the frontal
sinus, the cribriform plate, the ethmoid roof, and
the sphenoid sinus in some cases. The onlay
(overlay) technique is recommended if there is a
risk of nerves or vessels injury. It is also indicated
when an inlay technique is not technically possible. The graft is placed generally over the dural
lesion and over the exposed bony margins, which
have been denuded of the mucosa. The graft is
supported in place with layers of Gel foam/Gel
lm or Surgicel; followed by a packing, overlay
grafts (79%) are more frequently used as compared to inlay grafts (12%). As an alternative, a
vascularized haddad ap (nasoseptal ap) can be
used designed over the nasal septal branch of
sphenopalatine artery (Fig.29.2a–c).

334
H. Al Saey et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
ab
c
Fig. 29.2 (a) Cribriform plate with exit of olfactory bers (yellow arrow), meningocele is seen at the level of fovea
ethmoidalis (Red arrow). (b) Fat plug inserted into the defect. (c) Fascia lata placed as overlay graft
3. Loew F, Pertuiset B, Chaumier EE, et al. Traumatic,
Take Home Messages
• Any unilateral nasal discharge should be
investigated for CSF rhinorrhea.
• Beta-2 transferrin is the diagnostic lab
test with high sensitivity and
specicity.
• Endoscopic CSF rhinorrhea repair has
high rate of success.
• Early diagnosis and localization of site
of leak is key for successful
management.
References
1. Han CY, Backous DD.Basic principles of cerebrospinal uid metabolism and intracranial pressure homeostasis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2005;38:569–76.
2. Har-El G.What is “spontaneous” cerebrospinal uid
rhinorrhea? Classication of cerebrospinal uid leaks.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108:323–6.
spontaneous and postoperative CSF rhinorrhea. Adv
Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1984;11:169–207.
4. Friedman JA, Ebersold MJ, Quast LM.Posttraumatic
cerebrospinal uid leakage. World J Surg.
2001;25:1062–6.
5. Kerman M, Cirak B, Dagtekin A. Management of
skull base fractures. Neurosurg Q. 2002;12:23–41.
6. Friedman JA, Ebersold MJ, Quast LM. Posttraumatic cerebrospinal uid leakage. World J Surg.
2001;25:1062–6.
7. Banks CA, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, et al. Endoscopic
closure of CSF rhinorrhea: 193 cases over 21 years.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:826–33.
8. Kerr JT, Chu FW, Bayles SW. Cerebrospinal uid
rhinorrhea: diagnosis and management. Otolaryngol
Clin N Am. 2005;38:597–611.
9. Schlosser RJ, Bolger WE.Signicance of empty sella
in cerebrospinal uid leaks. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2003;128:32–8.
10. Reddy M, Baugnon K. Imaging of cerebrospinal uid rhinorrhea and otorrhea. Radiol Clin N
Am. 2017;55(1):167–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
rcl.2016.08.005. Review. PubMed PMID: 27890184.
11. Schlosser RJ, Wilensky EM, Grady MS, etal. Elevated
intracranial pressures in spontaneous cerebrospinal
uid leaks. Am J Rhinol. 2003;17:191–5.
AL GRAWANY
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
