Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4446_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
402
36.8.2 Hemangiomas
• Often appear bluish and are compressible.
• CT or MRI may help dene the extent of the
neoplasm, especially intrathoracic.
• Treatment: (depend on site, size, and severity
of symptoms) most often resolve spontane­ously within the rst decade.
• Surgical treatment is reserved for lesions with
rapid growth involving vital structures, which fail medical therapy (laser or oral propranolol in infantile type).
36.8.3 Branchial Cleft Cysts
S. S. Mohamed et al.
• Remnant of branchial cleft (second).
• Most commonly occur in the second or third
decades.
• Pain +/- (severe throbbing pain, can be
painless).
• Usually presents as a smooth, uctuant non-
tender (or tender), non-transluminal mass mobile forwards and downwards, underlying the anterior border of the SCM muscle.
• Branchial stula or sinus.
• Primary treatment is with control of infection
by antibiotics, followed by surgical excision.
36.8.4 Thyroglossal Duct Cyst
• This is a common congenital midline neck
mass.
• Can present as a mass in the lateral edge of the
thyroid cartilage.
• Pain and tenderness +/-.
• During clinical examintion, swelling can be
moved transversally but cannot be moved vertically.
• Elevates on protrusion of the tongue.
• Treatment is with initial control of infection
with antibiotics, followed by surgical exci­sion, including the mid-portion of the body of the hyoid bone (Sistrunk’s procedure). Occasionally, these lesions become infected and resolve or persist following surgery as a thyroglossal stula.
36.8.5 Sebaceous Cysts
• These are common masses often occurring in older people but can occur at any age.
• They are slow-growing, but sometimes uctu­ant and painful when infected.
• Diagnosis is made clinically; the skin overly­ing the mass is adherent, and a punctum is often identied.
• Excisional biopsy conrms the diagnosis.
36.8.6 Cervical Lymphadenopathy
• Acute lymphadenitis present as tender swelling
• Antibiotic trial, less acute inammatory nodes generally regress in size over 2–6 weeks. If lymph node did not subside then biopsy of the lymph node is advised.
infectious:
• Tuberculosis
• Toxoplasmosis
• syphilis
• glandular disease
Metastatic diease : from head and neck, chest
or abdomen
Lymphoma lymphosarcoma Reticulosarcoma
causes of
cervical lymph
adenopathy
sarcoidosis
36 An Approach toNeck Masses
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
36.8.6.1 TB Cervical Lymphadenitis
• Upper and middle deep cervical LN
• Onset: gradually
• Pain: +/-
• Systemic symptoms unusual in young (patients with abscess (painful, increase size, and skin discoloration))
• Mass: indistinct, rm, matted, uctuate in case of abcess collection
• Treatment with anti-TB (6–9 months)
– Rifampicin – Ethambutol – INH – Pyrazinamide
403
Coronal and axial CT neck with contrast for a patient with TB lymphadenitis
36.8.7 Carotid Body Tumor
• Rare tumor of chemoreceptors (age of presen­tation: 40–60 years).
• Slow-growing painless sometimes pulsating lump, may be bilateral.
• During examination: mass can be moved side to side.
• Symptoms of transient cerebral ischemia
• Potato tumors (hard, non-tender)
• Palpation may induce a vasovagal attack.
• Biopsy is contraindicated: MRI angiography is the investigation of choice.
• Surgical removal is based on patient present­ing symptoms.
36.8.8 Pharyngeal Pouch
• Diverticulum of the pharynx through the gap between the horizontal bers of the cricopha­ryngeus muscle inferiorly and the lowermost oblique bers of the inferior constrictor mus­cle superiorly.
• History of halitosis regurgitation of froth and food. There is no bile or acid taste to it.
• Pressure on the swelling causes gurgling sounds and regurgitation.
• Treatment: cricopharyngeal myotomy.
AL GRAWANY
404
Anteroposterior and lateral view of barium swallow in a pharyngeal pouch
36.8.9 Thyroid Masses
• Thyroid neoplasms are a common cause of anterior compartment neck masses in all age groups, with a female predominance and are mostly benign.
• Ultrasound and ne needle aspiration of thy­roid masses have become the standard of care.
• Unsatisfactory aspirates should be repeated, and negative aspirates should be followed up with a repeat FNAC and examination in 3 months time.
S. S. Mohamed et al.
36.8.10 Ludwig’s Angina
• Rare but serious connective tissue infection of the oor of the mouth
• Mostly due to dental infections
• Signs of inammation present (pain, swelling, redness, tendrenss and uctuation)
• Treatment: priority to protect the airway, drainage of the pus + antibiotic to cover aer­obes and anaerobe
36 An Approach toNeck Masses
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
405
36.8.11 Salivary Gland Neoplasm
1. Major salivary gland (a) Parotid gland (b) Submandibular gland (c) Sublingual gland
2. Minor salivary gland
• 600–1000 minor salivary glands distrib­uted throughout the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract (more common in the soft and hard palate).
• 80% of salivary gland tumors occur in the parotid.
• 10–15% in the minor salivary gland.
• 5–10% in the submandibular gland.
• 80% of the parotid tumors are benign.
• The most common benign parotid neo­plasm is pleomorphic adenoma.
• 50% of the submandibular gland tumors are benign.
• 30% of the minor salivary gland tumors are benign.
36.8.11.1 The Most Common Benign Tumor oftheParotid
• Pleomorphic adenoma (benign mixed tumor)
• Warthin’s tumor (papillary cyst adenoma
lymphomatosum)
• Monomorphic adenoma
– Basal cell adenoma – Canalicular adenomas – Oncocytoma – Myoepitheliomas
• Granular cell tumor
• Hemangioma
FNA (ne needle aspiration) The accuracy is
around 90% depending on the techniques of aspirate and the cyto pathologist.
Supercial parotidectomy is considered as a diagnostic and therapeutic for most benign tumors.
36.8.11.2 The Most Common
Malignant Neoplasm oftheParotid Gland
1. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma—40%
2. Adenoid cystic carcinoma—10%
3. Acinic cell carcinoma—10–15%
It is considered a low-grade tumor.
4. Malignant mixed tumor—7%
It is considered a high-grade malignancy.
5. Polymorphous low-grade
adenocarcinoma—10% It is a low-grade variant of adenocarcinoma.
6. Adenocarcinoma—10%
It is a high-grade with poor prognosis.
7. Squamous cell carcinoma—4%
It is high-grade, more common in elderly patients
*A case of pleomorphic carcinoma invading the skin
AL GRAWANY
406
Coronal and axial CT with contrast for left parotid mass
S. S. Mohamed et al.
36.8.12 Metastatic Lymph Nodes
• Upper cervical lymph nodes (upper aerodi­gestive tract).
• Accessory chain of nodes in the posterior tri­angle (nasopharyngeal malignancies).
• In many cases (occult primary), most common sites are tonsil, base of the tongue, nasophar­ynx, and pyriform sinus.
• Virchow’s LN (left supraclavicular lymph node): abdomen and thoracic malignancies painless, non-tender, and hard masses.
• Workup: Search for primary, treatment according to the primary disease.
36.8.12.1 Characteristics ofMalignant Neck Lumps
Lymphomas
• Painless lump, non-tender, smooth, and dis-
crete slow growing.
• Patient presented with malaise, weight loss,
pallor, fever, rigor, and hepatosplenomegaly.
• Abdomen pressure on IVC (inferior venacava)
may cause bilateral leg edema, other lymph nodes in the axilla, groin, and abdomen should be examined.
• Treatment: according to the stage:
– Chemotherapy. – Radiation therapy. – Immunotherapy.
36 An Approach toNeck Masses
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Take-Home Messages
• Neck masses are common and most often due to lymphadenopathy second­ary to a self-limited infection or inammation.
• Basic knowledge of neck anatomy and structures is required.
• Thorough history and examination usu­ally suggest a diagnosis.
• In the differential diagnosis, the three most important categories to distinguish are: infective/inammatory, congenital, and neoplastic masses.
• Appropriate investigations may be per­formed at a GP (General practitioner) or specialist level.
• Reasonable rst-line management for a suspected infective/inammatory mass is a course of a broad-spectrum antibi­otic with referral to a specialist if the mass does not resolve within 2–4 weeks.
• All suspected neoplastic and congenital masses should be referred for specialist attention.
407
Further Reading
1. Flint PW, Haughey BH, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, Niparko JK, Lund VJ, Lesperance MM Cummings otolaryngology- head and neck surgery E-Book: head and neck surgery.
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines in oncology: thyroid carcinoma version 2.2013
3. Cooper DS, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines task­force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1167–214.
4. Current surgical therapy: management of thyroid nodules
5. Philip S, etal. Current surgical therapy: evaluation of the isolated neck mass.
6. Pierce, Niel. Surgery at a glance. 5th ed.
AL GRAWANY
Principles ofManagement ofHead andNeck Cancers
AnilK.D’Cruz, RichaVaish, andHarshDhar
37
37.1 Introduction
Head and neck cancers is a term synonymous with the squamous cell carcinomas arising from the mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity, pharynx (oropharynx, hypopharynx), larynx and nasal cavity/paranasal sinuses. They are the seventh leading cause of cancer worldwide accounting for nearly 900,000 new cases and 450,000 deaths annually [1]. The majority of these cancers are a result of tobacco and alcohol abuse. With their decreasing consumption in parts of the developed world, there is lowering in the incidence of these cancers. Parallel to this, the last decade has wit-
A. K. D’Cruz (*) Apollo Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, India
Department of Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
R. Vaish Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
H. Dhar Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Superspeciality Hospitals, Howrah, West Bengal, India
nessed a rise in the incidence of oropharyngeal cancers attributed to infection with human papil­lomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 [2]. HPV-related cancers are the cause of 60–70% of oropharyn­geal cancers in the developed world. This change is not apparent in low- and middle-income coun­tries where oropharyngeal cancers are still pri­marily tobacco related [3]. HPV-related cancers are recognized as a distinct biological entity with differences in epidemiology, pathophysiology and responses to treatment (discussed in Chap.
38). This chapter aims to conceptualize the over-
all principles of management of head and neck cancers in light of recent developments. Because of their unique characteristics, nasopharyngeal cancers are distinct and are covered in detail in a separate section.
• Natural history of the disease
• Evaluation and diagnosis
• Treatment philosophy
• Principles of management of head and neck cancers
• Management of recurrent/metastatic cancers
• Recent advances
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 A. Al-Qahtani et al. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Otolaryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_37
409
410
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. K. D’Cruz et al.
37.2 Natural History oftheDisease
Tobacco-related head and neck cancers develop after years of substance abuse through a well­dened tumour progression model [4]. Dysplastic and molecularly altered changes occur in the entire upper aerodigestive tract exposed to the carcinogenic effects of tobacco. This phenome­non, termed as eld cancerization proposed ini­tially by Slaughter [5], predisposes patients to the development of second primary cancers. In con­trast, HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers occur de novo in normal mucosa and therefore do not have the increased risk of second primary cancers.
Second primary cancers occur following treat­ment of the index cancer at the rate of 1–5% per year [6]. The cumulative risk at 20years varies to as high as 25–40% and more so if patients persist with their addictions [79]. These tumours occur in the head and neck region, oesophagus or lung. They could be simultaneous (diagnosed at the time of index cancers), synchronous (within 6months of diagnosis of index cancers) or meta­chronous (6months after diagnosis of index can­cers). This must be kept in mind during workup and follow-up.
37.3 Diagnostic Workup
Treatment is primarily inuenced by a) patient­related factors—comorbidities, performance sta­tus, medical/family history; b) tumour factors—tumour characteristics (HPV status) and extent of disease. Diagnostic workup is therefore directed towards these two areas to help glean maximum information in an attempt to select the best treatment, improve outcomes and limit morbidity.
(a) Patient-related factors: A thorough history of
disease-related information and addictions/ substance abuse is elicited. Associated comorbidities which occur in as high as 20–50% of patients must be sought for as it has a bearing on treatment decisions [10, 11].
Fanconi’s anaemia, ataxia telangiectasia, xeroderma pigmentosa and immunosuppres­sive states are known to predispose to head and neck cancers and appropriate history must be elucidated. Dental history and exam­ination of dental hygiene such as sharp teeth, ill-tting dentures and dental caries are important.
(b) Tumour factors: Diagnosis is established by a
punch biopsy avoiding obviously necrotic areas in the majority of head and neck tumours. Imaging is preferably performed prior to biopsy in obvious cases to avoid biopsy­induced artefacts. This is particularly impor­tant before positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to avoid false positives as the consequence of inammation. Fine needle aspiration biopsy is a useful alternative in deep-seated inaccessible lesions and for neck nodes. Open node biopsy is to be avoided as it violates tissue planes and may cause tumour spillage. Excisional biopsy of nodes is done only when more material is needed for further studies (immunohistochemistry (IHC), micro­biology, etc.).
Assessment of HPV status is particularly important for oropharyngeal cancers and patients who present with unknown primary. p16 IHC staining because of its simplicity and easy availability is recommended to establish HPV infection. The expression should be present both at the cytoplasmic and nuclear level with an intensity of +2/3 and a diffuse overexpression of 75% to be considered as positive. HPV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) in situ hybridization (ISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests have a greater spec­icity but are not routinely used due to cost, the complexity of the procedure and the need for the fresh tissue [
12].
Assessment of the extent of disease is impor­tant to stage and plan treatment. The mucosal spread is best evaluated endoscopically, usually an ofce procedure. Direct/microlaryngoscopic evaluation is required for glottic cancers and to evaluate blind spots, e.g. post cricoid region and apex of the pyriform fossa. Evaluation under anaesthesia is useful when exible
AL GRAWANY
37 Principles ofManagement ofHead andNeck Cancers
411
endoscopy and imaging are incongruous with clinical ndings, e.g. root of tongue involve­ment. Imaging gives the true deep extent of dis­ease. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is the workhorse and is the investiga­tion of choice in the majority of head and neck tumours. It is excellent for assessment of corti­cal bone and cartilage involvement and also has a high sensitivity for neck nodes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its better soft tissue delineation is usually preferred for the tongue, oor of the mouth and oropharyngeal cancers. It is ideal for perineural spread, dural/ intraorbital involvement and marrow inltra­tion. Its limitation is that early cartilage and bone erosion may be overestimated. Involvement of skull base, encasement of the internal carotid artery, inltration of preverte­bral fascia and mediastinal extension of the dis­ease are denite signs of inoperability [13].
PET scan is indicated when there is a high likelihood of distant metastasis (locally advanced disease (T4), large bulky nodes (N2/ N3), lower level nodes (levels III/IV), hypo­pharyngeal cancers and recurrent tumours) [14]. In cost constraint settings, a CECT tho­rax is a suitable replacement given that the lung is the most common site of distant metas­tasis. Kim etal. demonstrated that the detec­tion rates for pulmonary metastasis between PET CT and CECT thorax were essentially the same [15]. PET CT scan is also indicated for response assessment following chemoradio­therapy (CRT) which is ideally performed 12 weeks after completion of treatment to avoid false positive nding [16]. Given its very high negative predictive value in this set­ting, a negative PET can be interpreted as the absence of disease with upwards of 90% surety [17].
PET scan is also the imaging modality of choice for an unknown primary and helps iden­tify the site of origin in 25–50% of cases [18,
19]. Blind biopsies which were in vogue in the
past are to be deprecated and should be directed based on imaging ndings. With changing epi­demiology, 90% of patients presenting with an unknown primary are HPV associated of oro-
pharyngeal origin [12] and establishing HPV status is useful. Some authors recommend a routine tonsillectomy (unilateral/bilateral) and carpet excision of the ipsilateral base of tongue which can locate the primary in as high as 90% of cases [20]. Another site commonly associ­ated with the unknown primary is the naso­pharynx which is often Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) associated. Detecting EBV encoded RNA (EBER) with ISH helps establish a naso­pharyngeal primary [12].
37.4 Pathology
World health organization (WHO) describes vari­ous histological variants of SCC, namely acan­tholytic, adenosquamous, basaloid, cuniculatum, papillary, spindle cell or sarcomatoid and verru­cous carcinoma. Although having specic patho­logical characteristics and disease biology, these variants are all essentially treated similarly [21]. Verrucous cancers are unique in that differentiat­ing them from verrucous hyperplasia is often dif­cult and deep biopsies may need to be performed to obtain representative sections demonstrating invasion of the basement membrane (essential prerequisite to establish cancer). Up to 10–20% of verrucous carcinoma may be hybrid and reveal foci of SCC on nal histology.
Histopathology is preferably reported by dedi­cated pathologists and captured in a synoptic reporting proforma to ensure recording of essen­tial parameters to prognosticate and plan treat­ment. Histological parameters are best captured under the headings of essential, desirable and optional (Table37.1).
37.5 Current American Joint
Committee onCancer (AJCC) Staging Eighth Edition Highlighting Major Stages
The current staging system followed is the eighth edition AJCC TNM staging system [22]. This replaced the seventh edition from 2018 [23]. The major changes are in the T stage of oral cancers
412
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Table 37.1 Synoptic pathology report of head and neck tumours
Essential Desirable Optional
T stage
• – Size (bidimensional) – Depth of invasion
Contiguous structure involvement – Skin – Muscle – Bone – Cartilage
Nodes – Size – Number (positive/total nodes harvested) – Level – Extra nodal extension
p16 IHC for HPV status in oropharyngeal
cancer
Tumour morphology – Endophytic – Exophytic – Ulcerative – Inltrative
Grade Lymphovascular invasion
Perineural invasion/spread Extra nodal extension
• – Microscopic (≤2mm) – Macroscopic (>2mm)
Worst pattern of invasion (WPOI)
Histological variants of SCC
EGFR expression Markers of
• immunotherapy when relevant (e.g. PDL1, PD1)
A. K. D’Cruz et al.
and N stage of head and neck cancers. In addi­tion, HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer is recog­nized as a separate entity with a dedicated staging.
Depth of invasion (DOI) has been incorpo­rated into the T stage of oral cancers. DOI is different from tumour thickness and is measured as the perpendicular line dropped from the base­ment membrane of the most adjacent normal mucosa to the deepest point of invasion. This line is also referred to as the ‘plumb line’. The restag­ing denes the tumours which are 2 cm in greatest dimension with DOI 5 mm as T1; tumours >2cm and 4cm in the greatest dimen­sion with DOI 10 mm and 2 cm in greatest dimension with DOI >5mm and 10mm as T2; tumours >4cm in greatest dimension with DOI 10 mm and 4cm in the greatest dimension with DOI >10mm as T3; and tumours >4cm in greatest dimension with DOI >10mm considered now as T4 [22].
The other important change is in the N stage with the incorporation of extranodal extension (ENE). ENE is dened as the extension of the carcinoma through the brous capsule of the node into the surrounding tissue. Presence of ENE upstages nodal disease to N2 if the size is ≤3cm and to N3 if nodal size >3cm. Both minor and major ENE are at present given similar importance but the AJCC task force recommends capture and documentation of ENE as minor <2 mm and major >2 mm from the capsule.
Studies have shown a difference in outcomes with minor and major ENE and hence the need to capture this data which might be of help to mod­ify staging subsequently [24]. ENE places the patients into a high-risk group and warrants adju­vant chemoradiotherapy.
With the growing evidence that HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers are a biologically differ­ent disease with better prognosis, the new stag­ing system identies these tumours as distinct and accords a separate staging system. Carcinoma in situ (Tis) and subdivision of T4a and T4b have been removed from HPV positive cancer. N staging for HPV cancers has under­gone signicant change with separate clinical and pathological N staging. Metastatic neck nodes ipsilateral single or multiple 6 cm is classied as N1 while bilateral/contralateral nodes 6cm are staged as N2. Any node >6cm in size is staged as N3. Pathological N stage is applicable to the group of patients undergoing surgery. The size of the node and laterality did not impact the outcome in patients treated with surgery. The N staging is done based on positive neck nodes: N1 being 4 and N2 being >4 meta­static lymph nodes.
Another minor change is the elimination of the stage T0 category from the staging of unknown primary for all subsites of head and neck except HPV-related oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal cancers, where a diagnosis can be established with HPV ISH and EBER ISH in
AL GRAWANY