Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4442_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
50 Мб
Скачать
10 Cleft Rhinoplasty-Related Complications andManagement
Fig. 10.37 Alar nose shortening. Diagram illustrating the outcome after nose asymmetry correction
Fig. 10.38 A 5-year-old male patient born with unilateral cleft lip who developed nose asymmetry characterized by alar shortening after primary cleft rhinoplasty
317
318
P. Rossell-Perry
method) and congenital hypoplasia of the ala. If the subnasal incision is not prop­erly located and it is placed higher, then the surgeon leaves a short nasal ala because part of the nasal ala is included in the lip. The second event is the congenital hypo­plasia of the ala (a rare condition), and another associated problem is the alar necro­sis after primary cleft rhinoplasty. Its diagnosis is made by carefully observing the alar’s length measured from the alar base to the nasal tip and comparing the two sides. Its correction is challenging since it requires the addition of tissues to com­pensate for the deciency. The use of composite grafts from the auricular helix has become the alternative of choice to repair these sequelae (Fig.10.39) [36]. The main disadvantage is the viability and contracture of these composite grafts, which reduce their size and change their color and texture. An alternative is the reduction of the noncleft side; however, this is altering the anatomy of the ala and affecting the natu­ral appearance of the nose.

Columella

Secondary columellar deciencies may be observed in association with the use of Mohler’s cheiloplasty especially with the extended modication published by Cutting [37]. The use of columellar tissue for lip repair reduces the width of the columellar region and leaves a visible scar. Sometimes, the defect is minor and does not require any revision. The indication for surgery depends on surgeon’s criteria and patient’s expectation.
Fig. 10.39 Diagram illustrating the surgical technique used for alar shortening based on auricular composite graft technique
10 Cleft Rhinoplasty-Related Complications andManagement
319

Nasal Sill: Wider Nasal Sill

This is a common nondesirable outcome after cleft lip repair and has been reported by different authors. This outcome is observed as a result of decient surgical tech­nique considering also the pulling action of the facial muscles or by hypertrophy of the lip scar. This problem is easier to correct by skin resection and the amount is determined by establishing the differences between cleft and noncleft alar base widths. This bad outcome is often associated with nasoalveolar stulas (Figs. 10.40,
10.41, 10.42, 10.43 and 10.44).

Narrower Nasal Sill

Alar tissue may be hypoplastic; therefore, it could explain this bad outcome; how­ever, this is mostly due to bad planning and execution of the primary surgical cor­rection, and scar contracture may also be associated with this bad outcome too. The overcorrection technique, a surgical method popularized by centers such as Chang Gung University Craniofacial center from Taiwan, uses the nostril and nasal base overcorrection during primary cleft rhinoplasty. I do not agree with this concept because the nose may be overcorrected after long term and its repair is more dif­cult [38]. Its diagnostic is made similar to that of the previous case, in which the position of the alar bases is located and their diameter differences are established. A
Fig. 10.40 Wider nasal oor. Diagram illustrating the nose asymmetry associated with right widening alar
320
Fig. 10.41 Wider nasal oor. Diagram illustrating the surgical technique used for its correction
Fig. 10.42 Wider nasal oor. Diagram illustrating the outcome after nose asymmetry correction
P. Rossell-Perry
10 Cleft Rhinoplasty-Related Complications andManagement
Fig. 10.43 A 6-year-old female patient born with unilateral cleft lip who developed nose asymmetry characterized by alar widening after primary cleft rhinoplasty
Fig. 10.44 Postoperative view after 1year of the patient presented in Fig.10.40
321
lateral ap from the cheek can be used to correct this secondary deformity, and the ap diameter is equal to the difference between the two alar bases.
The nasal oor is an anatomical structure made up of three anatomical segments: the nasal vestibule and the hard and soft palates. The anterior segment of the nasal oor (vestibular segment) is repaired during primary repair using three aps: lateral (nasal ala), medial (base of the columella), and posterior (mucosal ap raised from the lips) aps.
322
P. Rossell-Perry

Nasal Vestibule

The vestibule is an important functional area of the nose, and its involvement during primary cleft rhinoplasty may affect breathing. Thus, the incisions made in this anatomical segment may produce scar retractions or synechiae, and this is the rea­son why the use of nasal conformers is recommended after primary cleft rhino­plasty. They can be associated with patient idiosyncrasy but also with the use of extended incisions through the nasal vestibule during primary cleft rhinoplasty (i.e., VYZ cleft rhinoplasty). Its diagnosis is made through the physical examination and airway obstruction symptoms (Figs.10.45, 10.46, 10.47 and 10.48). Treatment of these conditions is challenging for the reconstructive surgeons, and recurrence is a common problem. Management is surgical, and different techniques are used for
Fig. 10.45 Contracture of the nasal vestibule scar. Diagram illustrating the surgical technique markings used for correction of the nose vestibular scar contracture
Fig. 10.46 Contracture of the nasal vestibule scar. Postoperative diagram illustrating the correction of the vestibular scar contracture using the VYZ method
10 Cleft Rhinoplasty-Related Complications andManagement
323
this purpose, ranging from skin grafts to local aps. The conservative use of steroid inltration seems to help although only in the early stages and should be used in combination with nasal stents. In a recent study, we observed a reduced rate of this bad outcome after using these devices [39]. The proposed surgical technique for its correction is the V-Y composite ap plus lateral Z plasty in combination with post­operative nasal conformers. In addition, due to the increased rate of recurrence, the use of postoperative nasal stents for at least 6months is recommended. The purpose of this technique is to lengthen the nasal vestibule while the scar contracture is breaking.
Fig. 10.47 A 10-year-old patient who developed a severe scar contracture of the nose after primary cleft rhinoplasty
Fig. 10.48 Immediate postoperative view of the patient presented in Fig.10.47 illustrating scar contracture release after correction using the VYZ method
324
P. Rossell-Perry
Poor Outcomes Associated withBilateral Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty
Compared with unilateral cleft lip, the bilateral cleft lip is more frequently associ­ated with bad outcome and complications [1]. Brown described the nature of the bilateral cleft lip and palate as follows: “twice as difcult to repair compared to the unilateral cleft lips with outcomes that were half as good” [40]. Sir Harold Gillies, pioneer of reconstructive surgery, noted “the skeleton rst,” highlighting the impor­tance of rebuilding the skeletal structure rst in craniofacial reconstruction [40]. During primary lip and nose repair, the soft tissues are corrected before the skeleton which explains many of the bad outcomes observed after bilateral cleft lip surgery. Asymmetries, hypertrophic scars, and dental skeletal sequelae are commonly observed after primary bilateral cleft lip surgery due to the unrepaired skeleton. Another important factor is that due to the low incidence of bilateral cases (com­pared to unilateral cases), it takes more time for surgeons to acquire the necessary experience to treat them. Bad outcomes are often observed after bilateral cleft lip surgery, mostly in severe cases, and practiced by inexperienced surgeons. Based on the author’s classication, a severe bilateral cleft lip and palate is one that has an alveolar cleft wider than 1cm [1]. The author described the clock diagram, a practi­cal scheme to illustrate this pathology in a better way [41]. An effective and timely interdisciplinary team management is essential to prevent these nondesirable out­comes. The use of presurgical treatment helps to improve the quality of the results but should be provided early (during the rst weeks of life). These devices mobilize the cleft segments and premaxilla in a more anatomical position facilitating the primary surgical repair and preventing sequelae, and they are indicated for severe cases. When the lip and nose are repaired under tension, there are increased rates of dehiscence, hypertrophic scarring, premaxilla malpositioning, and nasal sequelae. Presurgical nasal molding combined with alveolar molding (known as NAM) was developed by the University of New York based on Matsuo’s ndings and is an alternative for facilitating nasal surgery; however, there is a lack of scientic evi­dence supporting its long-term effect, and similar outcomes can be achieved by using primary cleft rhinoplasty alone [42]. Different publications show a signicant improvement in outcomes for bilateral nasal deformity after primary repair mini­mizing the psychological impact of patients [43, 44].
The secondary nasal deformity of bilateral cleft lip presented the following characteristics:
• Bad alar cartilage positioning and lack of projection of the nasal tip.
• Absent or short nasal columella. “Short” columella resulting from lateral dis-
placement of the alar cartilage. In fact, this is not short; it is “hidden in the nose,”
as Mulliken pointed out for bilateral cleft lips.
10 Cleft Rhinoplasty-Related Complications andManagement
325
• Obtuse labial columellar angle
• Wide nasal oor
• Ectopic insertion of nasal muscles
• Different degrees of maxillary hypoplasia
Some surgical technique shortcomings described in the literature are the use of banked fork aps using lip tissues for nose repair which results in an unnatural out­come (Millard), skin resection from the soft triangle of the nose proposed by Tajima and Mulliken bringing a turned-up appearance of the nose and visible scars affect­ing vestibular function, and the Mc Comb’s method which is associated with a high rate of nasal deformity relapse [28].
The author’s philosophy for the secondary correction of the bilateral cleft lip nose deformity is based on the following principles:
• Any severe bilateral cleft lip form (alveolar gap greater than 1cm) should receive
presurgical treatment at an early age before primary cleft rhinoplasty. Older
patients may be treated by vomer osteotomy and setback of the premaxilla.
• Columellar lengthening is based on alar cartilage reposition and vestibular
lengthening, via the VYZ technique [13].
• Compared with unilateral clefts, the need for septal correction is less frequent,
and this is mostly used for nonsymmetrical bilateral cleft lips.
• Any severe aesthetic or functional condition should be treated at an early age;
this is before school age, preventing the psychosocial and functional impact of
the patient. Any minor sequela can be corrected later in adulthood.
Careful physical examination and photographic documentation are recom­mended to address aesthetic and functional problems to be treated.
The anatomical areas to be analyzed include the nasal tip, columella, vestibule, alar bases, and septum.

Nasal Tip

The lateral displacement of alar cartilages in bilateral cleft lip is the reason for the lack of projection and denition. The proposed surgical technique for secondary nasal tip correction is based on medial repositioning of the alar cartilages which allows lengthening of the columella and nasal tip projection and lengthening of the nasal vestibule.
The technique used is a combination of V-Y (Potter’s concept) and lateral Z plasty (Berkeley’s concept), and it is indicated for complete bilateral cleft lips [31,
33]. By lengthening the nasal vestibule, it is possible to reposition the alar cartilages
326
P. Rossell-Perry
improving the nasal tip projection, and the lateral Z plasty prevents scar contracture of the lateral incisions. The surgical approach can be performed in an open or closed manner. Cartilaginous grafts are required to reinforce the area of the nasal vestibule that remains without cartilaginous reinforcement after medial displacement of the alar cartilages. An alternative for bilateral incomplete cleft lip cases is the rotational composite ap technique. This is based on the medial displacement of the compos­ite ap through rotation, but really the alar cartilage is displaced in three dimensions (vectors) as medial, vertical, and posterior movements (Fig.10.49). In case of minor deformities, the vestibular marginal skin excision is a good alternative providing long-term nasal symmetry [45] (Figs.10.50, 10.51 and 10.52).
Fig. 10.49 Lack of tip projection in a patient with bilateral cleft lip after primary cleft rhinoplasty