Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_734_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
14
J. Heard et al.
the enzymes and zymogens that aid in digestion, as well as alkaline uid, which are produced by the acinar cells and secreted into the ductal system. Initially, the acinar cells drain into intercalated ducts that come together to form interlobular ducts, which then join together to form secondary ducts that drain into the main pancreatic duct, and subsequently the duodenum at the ampulla of Vater.
The composition of pancreatic uid varies depending on whether the body is in a fasting state or a stimulated phase. When fasting, pancreatic uid has a bicarbon­ate concentration of 80mEq/L and is rich in protein. However, when the pancreas is stimulated after a meal, the concentration of bicarbonate increases, and this alkaline uid enters the duodenum. The uid has a pH of 7.6–9.0 and acts to neutralize gas­tric acid while delivering digestive enzymes in their inactive state to the duodenum.
Vagal parasympathetic stimulation is largely responsible for the secretion of enzyme-rich uid, while uid and electrolyte secretion are more hormonally regu­lated. The main hormones involved are secretin and cholecystokinin. The presence of acid in the duodenum results in the release of secretin from the duodenal mucosa. Secretin subsequently stimulates the interlobular duct cells to release bicarbonate and water. As the bicarbonate concentration increases in the pancreatic uid, chlo­ride concentration decreases in order to maintain isotonicity. CCK, released in the presence of fat and protein, stimulates the pancreatic acinar cells to release proen­zymes. Pancreatic secretion is also inuenced by neuropeptides, which have an inhibitory effect [13].
Endocrine Physiology
The main endocrine function of the pancreas is regulation of carbohydrate metabo­lism and glucose homeostasis via insulin and glucagon secretion. While insulin functions to transport glucose into cells, stimulate protein synthesis, and inhibit glycogenolysis and fatty acid breakdown, glucagon stimulates glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, increasing blood glucose levels. Pancreatic islet cells of Langerhans comprise the endocrine structure of the pancreas and are of neural crest origin. Blood enters the islet cells via an afferent arteriole, which then enters into a capillary bed within the cell. Hormones secreted as part of the pancreatic endocrine system are secreted into this capillary bed, and blood then exits via an efferent col­lecting venule to the portal venous circulation.
The islets of Langerhans are composed of several types of cells, 70% of which are beta cells, which are mostly found in the core of the islet. These beta cells are surrounded by alpha cells, delta cells, and pancreatic polypeptide cells, which com­municate with each other via extracellular spaces and gap junctions, allowing for cellular products secreted from one cell type to inuence the function of another. The four main cell types—A (alpha), B (beta), D cells, and F cells—have varied distributions and secretory products. While B and D cells are found in the tail of the pancreas, F cells are primarily located in the head and uncinate process and A cells are evenly distributed throughout. B cells make up about 70% of the islet cell mass
1 Anatomy andPhysiology
15
and are located centrally in the islet cell. The primary secretory product is insulin though amylin and cholecystokinin are also secreted by B cells.
Insulin is rst produced as preproinsulin in the ribosomes of the rough endoplas­mic reticulum before being cleaved into proinsulin and transported to the Golgi apparatus, where it is packaged into secretory granules. Proinsulin is then cleaved into insulin and C-peptide, and the secretory granules fuse with the cell membrane to secrete insulin. A cells are found more peripherally in the islet cells and comprise about 10% of islet cell mass. The main secretory product is glucagon. Also found peripherally within the islets are F cells, which make up 15% of islet cell mass. These cells secrete pancreatic polypeptide. D cells are distributed evenly within islet cells and make up 5% of their mass. D cells secrete somatostatin, while D2 cells secrete VIP.
Glucose is the main regulator of insulin secretion and is taken up by Beta cells through GLUT2 transporters. Glucokinase then phosphorylates glucose into glucose- 6-phosphate and subsequently produces ATP in the process of glycolysis. When the pancreas is unstimulated, insulin is secreted at a basal rate. However, rapid increases in blood glucose result in a “rst-phase” of insulin release that peaks within 5min and decreases within 10min. If the concentration of glucose in the blood remains high, a second phase is entered and insulin secretion is sustained by the release of both stored and newly synthesized insulin [2, 13].

References

1. Slack JM.Developmental biology of the pancreas. Development. 1995;121(6):1569–80.
2. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 20th ed. Elsevier; 2017.
3. Hurtado CW, Waasdorp C, Sferra T, Polk B. Embryology and anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract. 2023.
4. Dudek R. Embryology. In: High-yield embryology. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 1–55. 2009.
5. Jones O.The Small Intestine—Duodenum—Jejunum—Ileum—TeachMeAnatomy [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. https://teachmeanatomy.info/abdomen/gi- tract/small- intestine/
6. Talathi SS, Zimmerman R, Young M.Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, pancreas. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
books/NBK532912/.
7. Borghei P, Sokhandon F, Shirkhoda A, Morgan D.Anomalies, anatomic variants, and sources of diagnostic pitfalls in pancreatic imaging. Radiology. 2013;266(1):28–36. https://doi.
org/10.1148/radiol.12112469.
8. Raichholz G, Giménez S, Dumoulin S, Sañudo JL. Segmental anatomy of the pancreas and its developmental variants. Imagenes. 2016;5:10.
9. Aljiffry M, Abbas M, Wazzan MAM, Abduljabbar AH, Alou S, Aljahdli E.Biliary anatomy and pancreatic duct variations: a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(4):188–93.
10. Türkvatan A, Erden A, Türkoğlu MA, Yener Ö. Congenital variants and anomalies of the pan-
creas and pancreatic duct: imaging by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography and multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14(6):905–13.
11. Tol JAMG, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, et al. Denition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consen-
16
sus statement by the international study group on pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156(3):591–600.
12. Japan Pancreas Society, editor. Classication of pancreatic carcinoma. 4th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.; 2017. http://www.suizou.org/pdf/
Classication_of_Pancreatic_Carcinoma_4th_Engl_ed.pdf
13. Mulholland MW, Lillemoe KD, Doherty GM, Upchurch GR Jr, Hasan HB, Pawlik TM.Chapter 52: pancreas anatomy and physiology. In: Greeneld’s surgery scientic principles & practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
14. Yap CH, Coupland D, Au J, Raju S.Duodenum inversum: a rare cause of nausea and epigastric pain. BJR Case Rep. 2022;8(3):20210144.
15. Shaikh DH, Alemam A, von Ende J, Ghazanfar H, Dev A, Balar B. Ansa pancreatica, an uncommon cause of acute, recurrent pancreatitis. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2021;15(2):587–93.
16. Ono Y, Kaneko K, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Ando H.Pancreaticobiliary maljunction without bile duct dilatation in children: distinction from choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;46(5):555–60.
17. Urushihara N, Hamada Y, Kamisawa T, Fujii H, Koshinaga T, Morotomi Y, etal. Classication of pancreaticobiliary maljunction and clinical features in children. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(8):449–55.
18. Nagata E, Sakai K, Kinoshita H, Kobayashi Y.The relation between carcinoma of the gallblad­der and an anomalous connection between the choledochus and the pancreatic duct. Ann Surg. 1985;202(2):182–90.
19. Chen JJ, Lee HC, Yeung CY, Chan WT, Jiang CB, Sheu JC.Meta-analysis: the clinical features of the duodenal duplication cyst. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(8):1598–606.
20. Macpherson RI. Gastrointestinal tract duplications: clinical, pathologic, etiologic, and radiologic considerations. Radiographics. 1993;13:1063–80. https://doi.org/10.1148/
radiographics.13.5.8210590.
21. Cadili L, Cullen KL, Finn NJ, Singh A, Webber E, Hayashi AH.A rare case of a congenital pancreatic duplication cyst in an infant complicated by an upper GI bleed, pancreatitis, cyst infection and gastric outlet obstruction. J Surg Case Rep. 2022;2022(7):rjac326.
22. Deloose E, Janssen P, Depoortere I, Tack J. The migrating motor complex: control mecha­nisms and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(5):271–85.
23. Bowen R.Small intestinal motility [Internet]. VIVO Pathophysiology. [cited 2022 Oct 29].
http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/digestion/smallgut/motility.html.
24. Kitazawa T, Kaiya H.Regulation of gastrointestinal motility by motilin and ghrelin in verte­brates. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:278.
25. Kiela PR, Ghishan FK.Physiology of intestinal absorption and secretion. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(2):145–59.
26. Schubert ML.Gastric acid secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2016;32(6):452–60.
27. Field BCT.Neuroendocrinology of obesity. Br Med Bull. 2014;109(1):73–82.
28. Cakir M, Dworakowska D, Grossman A. Somatostatin receptor biology in neuroendocrine and pituitary tumours: part 1—molecular pathways. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(11):2570–84.
29. Villar HV, Fender HR, Rayford PL, Bloom SR, Ramus NI, Thompson JC. Suppression of gastrin release and gastric secretion by gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP). Ann Surg. 1976;184(1):97–102.
30. Modlin IM, Mitznegg P, Bloom SR.Motilin release in the pig. Gut. 1978;19(5):399–402.
31. Korimilli A, Parkman HP.Effect of Atilmotin, a motilin receptor agonist, on esophageal, lower esophageal sphincter, and gastric pressures. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(2):300–6.
32. Iwasaki M, Akiba Y, Kaunitz JD.Recent advances in vasoactive intestinal peptide physiol­ogy and pathophysiology: focus on the gastrointestinal system. F1000Res. 2019;8:F1000 Fac Rev-1629. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6743256/.
J. Heard et al.
Part II
Acute Pancreatitis
Chapter 2
Diagnosis andMedical Management ofAcute Pancreatitis
CarlosTheodoreHuerta, JodieAdamBarkin, andOnurC.Kutlu

Etiology

Acute pancreatitis is a major source of economic burden with an estimated cost of AP-related hospitalizations exceeding 2 billion dollars to the US healthcare system. [1, 2] The incidence of AP has been reported ranging between 15 and 45 cases per 100,000 patients in the United States and 5 and 73 cases per 100,000 patients globally, with an increase observed in recent years [3]. However, the two most frequent etiolo­gies in the US patient population include gallstones and excess alcohol consumption, which are estimated to occur between 40–70% and 25–35% of cases, respectively [46]. Given the importance of early diagnosis and recognition of the etiology of AP to prevent future recurrent episodes, abdominal ultrasound should be used to screen for the presence of cholelithiasis in all patients with AP [7, 8, 9]. Should the presence of cholelithiasis be conrmed in the setting of AP, these patients should be referred for consideration of interval cholecystectomy to prevent future episodes of disease.
Regarding pancreatitis secondary to alcohol consumption, symptoms can mani­fest along the entire disease spectrum ranging from individual, acute episodes to recurrent, chronic pancreatic dysfunction. Although multifactorial in nature due to other sensitizing factors such as smoking and genetic factors, patients with
C. T. Huerta DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
J. A. Barkin Pancreas Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
O. C. Kutlu ( DeWitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA e-mail: okutlu@med.miami.edu
Switzerland AG 2025 E. P. Ceppa et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Evolving Techniques in Pancreatic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78409-5_2
*)
19© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
20
C. T. Huerta et al.
alcohol- induced AP may have a history of excess alcohol intake more than 50g per day for more than 5years [6, 914].
Although alcohol and cholelithiasis-related AP predominate as the most com­monly encountered cases in patients, the remaining differential includes a broad list of potential etiologies that should be carefully evaluated. While only estimated to constitute less than 4% of cases, hypertriglyceridemia is a well-studied cause of AP. Serum levels of triglycerides are often >1000 mg/dL in patients with either primary or secondary hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis, and a fasting serum triglyceride taken 30days after discharge is often recommended in this popu­lation to conrm the diagnosis [1518]. Electrolyte disturbances including hyper­calcemia in isolation, or as a result of another medical cause such as hyperparathyroidism, have been documented as a causative factor in some patients. Pharmacologic insults from drugs known to cause AP such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are capable of eliciting disease episodes [6, 19]. Although uncom­mon, polymicrobial infections and toxins have also been shown to induce AP.
Anatomic causes resulting in hepatobiliary obstruction can similarly result in AP.Both benign and malignant masses of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system as well as the duodenum that impact the main pancreatic duct have been recognized as less common causes of AP.Previous series have identied up to 14% of patients with idiopathic AP (IAP) may have underlying pancreatic or biliary malignancies [2022]. Given the increasing incidence of pancreatic malignancy, a high degree of clinical suspicion for neoplastic etiologies associated with AP should be maintained particu­larly in younger patients and those with recurrent or prolonged episodes with no clearly identied etiology on routine workup [2325]. Focused cross-sectional imaging of the pancreas through abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI/MRCP as well as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can be considered in these patients [6, 26, 27].
Aberrant pancreatic anatomy and function can further predispose patients to develop AP.Congenital anomalies such as pancreas divisum can result in ampullary stenosis or obstruction impeding outow of the main pancreatic duct [28, 29]. Physiologic outow obstruction secondary to functional biliary dysfunction syn­drome is also a rare physiologic cause of AP [30]. Instrumentation procedures of the ampulla such as endoscopic radiographic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for these and other conditions can further precipitate AP episodes [31]. Newer genetic targets including mutations and polymorphisms in genes such as SPINK1, CFTR, and PRSS1 have been implicated in the development AP, and the role of testing for these allelic defects in patients with a signicant family history of AP and pancre­atic disease is still to be fully determined in future work [28, 32]. Patients with more than one family member with pancreatic disease may benet from formal genetic counseling. Together, these native genetic defects can further worsen the risk of disease in patients with the aforementioned anatomic and environmental factors contributing to a tissue milieu highly predisposed to inammation.
IAP occurs in patients without these aforementioned risk factors and in whom no clear etiology is elucidated on diagnostic laboratory workup and imaging tests [33,
34]. In these patients without a structural cause identied on abdominal cross-
sectional imaging, EUS may be considered to interrogate for the presence of microlithiasis.
2 Diagnosis andMedical Management ofAcute Pancreatitis
Etiology ofAcute Pancreatitis
A Alcohol, autoimmune B Biliary, including gallstones, microlithiasis, and sludge C Congenital—Pancreas divisum associated with genetic abnormality and pancreas, Crohn’s
disease via inammation, ampulla, or duodenal obstruction D Drugs, toxins (including, smoking, tobacco, and marijuana use) E Post-ERCP pancreatitis, eosinophilic pancreatitis F Formations—Primary cancers (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, especially in patients
>50years, lymphomas, carcinoids, metastatic cancers, small cell of lungs, renal, melanoma G Genetic mutations and polymorphisms—cystic brosis, transmembrane conductance
regulator [CFTR], cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1), serine protease inhibitor Kayal type 1
(SPINK1) and claudin-2 (CTRC) H Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia, hypertriglyceridemia may be associated with
metabolic pancreatitis, i.e., elevated glucose, obesity, hypercalcemia associated with
hyperparathyroidism or iatrogenic infusion I Infection—Including viruses, CMV, mumps and EBV (Forsmark NEJM), ascariasis and
Clonorchis sinensis, bacteria tuberculosis J Juxta ampullary diverticula—Likely mechanism obstruction K Kinetic injury and other trauma, including seat belt injuries
Ref. Barkin JS, Barkin JA
21

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of AP is incompletely understood. However, the clinical and pathologic features appear similar regardless of the etiology. Inciting physiologic insults from the aforementioned etiological factors are thought to result in the loss of intracellular and extracellular compartmentalization and lead to aberrant activa­tion of pancreatic enzymes within the pancreatic acinar cells [69]. This may sub­sequently result in autodigestive injury to the pancreas. Under normal conditions, the exocrine pancreas synthesizes and secretes several inactive digestive enzymes that are released into the duodenum via the pancreatic ducts and activated by tryp­sin. Under physiologic conditions, small amounts of these zymogens are activated spontaneously within the pancreas but are offset by natural inhibitory factors includ­ing pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PSTI or SPINK1), mesotrypsin, and enzyme Y which inactivate and lyse trypsin [10, 11, 35]. Nonspecic antiproteases in the pancreatic parenchyma such as alpha-1-antitrypsin and alpha-2- macroglobulin also help to prevent damage from inappropriate trypsin activation [10, 11]. During AP episodes, an overabundant pool of trypsin is activated within the pancreas and overwhelms these native defenses. Pathologic autodigestion develops from the colocalization of lysosomal enzymes including cathepsin B and trypsinogen in the
22
acinar cells as well as subsequent activation of trypsinogen and other glandular enzymes such as chymotrypsin, phospholipase A, and elastase within the pancreas [10, 13]. Elastase overactivity may result in the breakdown of the elastic bers within the vasculature wall and lead to hemorrhage. Phospholipase A among other factors has been implicated in fat necrosis observed in AP [14, 27]. This cascade of pathological enzymatic-induced degradation spreads throughout the pancreatic gland propagating further intrapancreatic enzyme activation and cell damage in a positive loop. The resultant activation of the systemic inammatory response syn­drome (SIRS) is responsible for driving systemic complications including extra­pancreatic end organ damage and failure [36].
Although most patients typically experience minimum to mild organ dysfunction as a result of pancreatitis, approximately 10–20% develop SIRS [3638]. This is dened by the presence of at least two of the following features: temperature below 36°C or above 38°C; heart rate above 90 beats per minute; respiratory rate above 20 breaths per minute or PaCO2 below 32 torr; white blood cell count above 12,000 cells/mm3, below 4000cells/mm3, or above 10% immature cells (bands) [12]. Pancreatic inammation can trigger SIRS via the activation of an inamma­tory cascade mediated by cytokines, immunologic cells, and the complement sys­tem. These inammatory cytokines cause dispersion and trafcking of macrophages and migration distant from the pancreas such as the lungs and kidneys. SIRS can lead to a fulminant course with multiorgan failure in addition to the development of local or systemic complications [3, 15, 31].
C. T. Huerta et al.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of AP is established by the presence of two or more of the three fol­lowing criteria: (i) abdominal pain consistent with the disease (acute onset of a persistent, severe, epigastric pain often radiating to the back), (ii) serum amylase and/or lipase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, and/or (iii) charac­teristic ndings from abdominal imaging [39].

Clinical Presentation

Physical exam ndings in AP vary based on the severity of disease presentation. As a result, the nonspecic nature of AP symptomatology may lead to misdiagnosis based on physical examination alone. Patients with mild AP may present only with minimal tenderness to palpation in the epigastrium, while those with severe pancre­atitis may have signicant tenderness diffusely throughout the abdomen and associ­ated fever, tachypnea, hypoxemia, and hypotension [40, 41].
The most common presentation is signicant abdominal pain, which may be so severe that the patient is reluctant to initiate deep respiratory efforts. This may
2 Diagnosis andMedical Management ofAcute Pancreatitis
23
subsequently result in hypoventilation and contribute to the increased incidence of respiratory complications observed in these patients, such as atelectasis and pulmo­nary consolidation [42, 43]. Given these patients’ abdominal pain and associated nausea and/or emesis, they may present with profound dehydration resulting in tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension, and even shock physiology. Sequestration of uid outside of the intravascular space in the retroperitoneum and other anatomic compartments due to inammatory mediators can further compound extra­pancreatic organ system failure such as in the renal system [36, 41].
Abdominal distention precipitated by the extravasation of uid into the retroperi­toneum is common. Fulminant peritonitis may evolve as a rare, late nding associ­ated with severe AP and is associated with a worse prognosis [44, 45]. Although uncommon, palpation of abdominal masses in the epigastrium or upper abdomen may suggest the presence of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Cullen’s sign (bruising of the periumbilical area) and Grey Turner’s sign (bruising of the ank) are consistent with retroperitoneal bleeding that can manifest in severe AP.These signs are rare and are associated with increased mortality [44, 45]. Signs of hepatobiliary obstruction including jaundice may be present on exam and should raise concern for an obstruc­tive process due to neoplastic lesions or anatomic causes.
This third-spacing of extracellular uid may further precipitate hemoconcentra­tion evidenced by elevated hematocrit and leukocytosis on serologic laboratory test­ing [42, 46]. Electrolyte abnormalities, elevated blood urea nitrogen, hypocalcemia, and hyperglycemia are also seen. Elevated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase, with or without the presence of elevated aminotransferases, should raise the suspicion for biliary obstruction—a common presentation of biliary pancreatitis [42, 46].

Laboratory Tests

Serum amylase and lipase are the most common laboratory tests used to diagnose AP [47, 48]. Early during AP, there is blockage of pancreatic digestive enzymes secretion while synthesis continues. Digestive enzymes leak from acinar cells through the basolateral membrane and into the interstitial space eventually entering systemic circulation. Serum amylase levels may rise 6–12h after the onset of symp­toms and usually return to normal within 3–5days in uncomplicated cases [49]. Serum amylase elevation is considered a nonspecic nding with sensitivity and specicity for the diagnosis of AP of 67–83% and 85–98%, respectively [48]. Serum amylase may be elevated in other conditions with an extra-pancreatic cause, such as diseases of the salivary glands, which also produce amylase. Patients with alcoholic pancreatitis may have an inability to produce sufcient amylase levels to meet cri­teria for pancreatitis in as high as 20% of cases and elevated triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis may interfere with accuracy of the amylase assay in up to 50% of patients [50, 51]. Furthermore, mild elevations in amylase or lipase in the setting of multiorgan failure and shock may be incidental ndings of systemic hypoperfusion and not true acute pancreatitis. A threefold
24
C. T. Huerta et al.
elevation of serum lipase level is more diagnostic, especially in patients seen several days after the acute attack, and serum lipase is elevated in both alcoholic and nonal­coholic pancreatitis [48]. Serum lipase has a sensitivity of 82–100% for the diagno­sis of acute pancreatitis, often rising within 4–8h after symptom onset and peaking at 24h. Lipase levels remain elevated longer than amylase, generally returning to normal within 8–14days after an episode of acute pancreatitis [48, 50, 51]. Trending of amylase and lipase levels in an acute episode is not indicated, and once a diagno­sis of acute pancreatitis is made, management should be driven only by symptom­atology. The only utility to repeating enzyme levels is when a patient has initially improved, then clinically declines with concern for complication such as a collec­tion (necrotic or inammatory) or recurrent episode of acute pancreatitis [39].

Imaging

At presentation, abdominal radiographs are useful in the exclusion of other causes of abdominal pain, such as bowel obstruction, ileus, or perforated bowel, but are not diagnostic for AP.Chest X-ray studies may show inltrates, left lower lobe atelec­tasis, or effusion [52, 53]. Abdominal lms may be unremarkable or show localized ileus of the small intestine, paucity of air in the distal colon to the splenic exure due to functional spasm of the descending colon, or ground glass appearance indi­cating an acute peripancreatic uid collection [52, 53].
On abdominal ultrasonography, the pancreas may appear diffusely enlarged and hypoechoic in AP [53]. Peripancreatic uid collections can be seen as anechoic areas that may contain internal echoes if pancreatic necrosis is present. Sensitivity of abdominal ultrasonography is as high as 95% in diagnosing uncomplicated cho­lelithiasis though its sensitivity decreases in the setting of biliary pancreatitis due to concurrent bowel distention [52, 53]. Up to 25–35% of patients have a limited radiologic exam on abdominal ultrasonography due to ileus or bowel gas that pre­cludes adequate visualization of the gland or the bile duct [54]. Nonetheless, abdominal ultrasonography is recommended to be performed in all patients with acute pancreatitis to evaluate for biliary etiologies and gallstones [53, 55]. Additional imaging should be used only when the diagnosis is not conclusive from the history, physical examination, and laboratory ndings or when a complicated course is anticipated.
CT imaging is not routinely indicated as the diagnosis is obvious in many cases, and many patients may have a mild and uncomplicated course. Despite this, intra­venous contrast-enhanced CT scanning is a useful imaging technique not only for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis but also for detection of local complications of pan­creatitis. This should be delayed until the patient is rehydrated if there is uncertainty of diagnosis because impairment of pancreatic perfusion and signs of pancreatic necrosis, recognized by the lack of enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT, can take several days [52]. After this time contrasted CT has been demonstrated to reliably identify the presence and extent of necrosis as well as local complications. If a