Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_734_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
314
and with or without pylorus preservation, and duodenum-preserving total pancre­atectomy, depending on the location and number of tumors [4, 10]. Some studies also report that radiofrequency ablation and cytoablative therapy can be performed in addition to surgery as well as IRE (irreversible electroporation) all of which are being currently studied [13].
Targeted therapy includes tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mTor inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD1, anti-PD L1, and anti-CTLA4. These are highly effective for metastatic RCC (mRCC) [8, 12]. However, there is a paucity of data and lack of evidence that shows this to be effective in treatment for mRCC to the pancreas specically [1, 12].
The 5-year survival rate for untreated mRCC was 13–47% compared to 65–88% after surgical resection [1]. Current data show the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival after surgical resection to be 88%, 72%, 33–72%, and 32%, respectively [1,
810, 14]. The overall survival rate after pancreatectomy for mRCC is longer com-
pared to pancreatectomy for other cancers [4, 11]. The median recurrence-free sur­vival after pancreas metastasectomy was 17.2months with a median recurrence rate of 44% after 27months, and a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 43% [2, 10, 12]. In line with the current data, surgical approach in well controlled and resection of iso­lated mRCC to the pancreas is now an integral part of treatment with good results. Whether synchronous or metachronous, a complete resection can lead to long-term survival [1, 2, 10, 11, 14].
R. Mudgway et al.

Colorectal Carcinoma

Introduction/Epidemiology
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with metastasis most commonly occurring to local lymph nodes (50–70%), the liver (50%), the bones (40%), the lungs (21%), the peritoneum (15%), the ovaries (15%), and the brain (5%) [15, 16]. Though CRC is one of the most common origins for metastatic pancreatic lesions, it is exceedingly rare, accounting for only 1.3–2% of pancreatic metastasis [1519]. CRC metastasis occurs via direct invasion through the colon, lymphatic channels, and via hematog­enous routes [15, 16]. There are two leading theories that explain the metastatic pattern of CRC: the mechanical/hemodynamic theory and the seed-and-soil theory [18]. The mechanical theory is based on anatomical delivery via the venous and lymphatic drainage systems [18]. The theory explains the colonic tumors spread via emboli that drain into the portal venous circulation and metastasize to the liver or by systemic routes to the lung. One study found that pancreatic metastases tend to be from right-sided tumors, which supports the mechanical spread theory where cecal tumors spread directly to the pancreas via the ileocolic and superior mesenteric ves­sels [18, 20]. The seed-and-soil theory is based on metastasizing tumor cells nding
18 Secondary Malignant Neoplasms
315
a tissue bed that is compatible for deposit and growth [18]. Given the rarity and unique location of the pancreas not found along normal anatomic drainage routes, seed-and-soil does offer a plausible mechanism [18]. Pancreatic metastases typi­cally occur 3–4 years after initial CRC diagnosis, though some cases have been reported to be more than 5 and even over 10years later [1517].
Diagnosis/Radiology/Pathology
The clinical presentation of metastatic CRC) is variable, 45–71% patients with pan­creatic metastasis from CRC are asymptomatic [15, 18]. Common presentations of a primary pancreatic tumor are abdominal pain, weight loss, and jaundice. Clinical presentation of patients with pancreatic metastasis from CRC is unique [18, 19]. The incidences of those same symptoms were abdominal pain (20%), weight loss (5%), and jaundice (30%) [19]. A major distinguishing feature is that 55% of patients whose tumor’s location was in the head of the pancreas did not present with jaundice, likely related to its location and growth [19].
When symptoms are present or during surveillance, the majority of pancreatic metastases are initially discovered on abdominal CT with a sensitivity of 68–86% and specicity of 65% [15]. Diagnosis with imaging alone is difcult [18, 19, 21]. Enhanced CT of pancreatic metastases from CRC will show a hypodense mass that is occasionally accompanied by the dilation of the distal main pancreatic duct, a similar nding to that of a primary pancreatic cancer which makes it difcult to discern in this context, also taking into account risks for a second primary [21]. Imaging may only be good to differentiate between CRC and RCC origin, which shows an intense enhancement during the arterial phase [18, 21].
In these cases, EUS-FNA has a sensitivity of 75–95%, specicity of 60–100%, and accuracy >91% [15, 21]. EUS typically reports pancreatic metastatic lesions as hypoechoic, heterogeneous masses with well-dened margins, and other ndings suggestive of secondary lesions are multiples lesions, lack of a retention cysts, pan­creatic duct dilation, and pancreatic atrophy [15]. There is controversy over the necessity of biopsy with EUS-FNA for informed treatment decisions. The opposi­tion argues the risk of tumor cell dissemination, while advocates argue for accurate staging diagnosis with biopsy for the following indications: “(1) all other diagnostic measures failed; (2) pathological examination demonstrates certain markers or gene mutations that are needed for initiation of specic treatments; (3) biopsy results will inuence therapy; (4) biopsy results can avoid or minimize surgery; and (5) loco­regional staging of pancreatic tumors” [18].
Immunohistochemical ndings are helpful in differentiating pancreatic metasta­sis from primary pancreatic cancer [15, 17, 21]. Immunochemical staining shows a specic pattern (CK20+, CK7-, and CDX2+) [18, 21]. The respective rates of CK20 and CK7 positivity were 100% and 5% in colorectal cancer, and 62% and 92% in pancreatic cancer [21]. CDX2 is expressed positively in the majority of CRC, while in contrast the rate is only 0–50% in pancreatic carcinomas [18, 21]. When
316
performing EUS-FNA, an adequate sample of the specimen is needed [21]. Use of a thicker needle or performing a rapid on-site evaluation to assess the quantity is recommended [21].
R. Mudgway et al.
Treatment/Prognosis
Treatment for CRC metastasis to the pancreas is primarily chemotherapy and metas­tasectomy of solitary lesions without extrapancreatic metastasis, as determined on an individual basis [15]. Early pancreatic metastasis could be treated surgically with most of the diagnoses coming at advanced stages with inltration of local organs, local nodes, or distant metastasis. However, only about 20% of patients are referred for surgery [16]. These surgeries include total pancreatectomy, distal pancreatec­tomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy [16, 19]. Tumor proximity to the SMV or PV in well-selected patients is not a con­traindication to resection based on previous reviews of the topic [16]. Palliative surgery is performed to provide adequate biliary or alimentary passage which includes biliary-intestinal anastomoses and gastrointestinal anastomoses [16].
The 5-year survival of CRC with metastasis to the pancreas is 14–50% with mortality and morbidity to be 1.4% and 48.3%, respectively [17]. Patients also have a median survival time of 16.5 months, and a disease-free survival period of
1.5–43 months, with 100% of symptomatic relief until recurrence of death [18]. Though data is scarce for CRC metastasis to the pancreas, and the optimal treatment is yet to be established. Multiple literature reviews and case studies agree that pan­creatic resections may provide a denitive diagnosis as well as a survival benet and should be considered in patients who are well selected, t for surgery, free of metas­tasis to other organs, and are discussed properly in multidisciplinary fashion [1519].

Melanoma

Introduction/Epidemiology
Melanoma is one of the most common malignancies that metastasizes to the gastro­intestinal tract and usually affects multiple organ sites [22, 23]. Autopsy data have revealed gastrointestinal tract involvement in 50–60% of patients with melanoma; however, the clinical diagnosis is only made in 1.5–4.4% of melanoma patients [24]. Solitary organ involvement of melanoma to the pancreas is extremely rare, occurring in <1% of metastatic melanoma cases [22, 23, 25]. There are <200 cases
18 Secondary Malignant Neoplasms
317
of pancreatic metastasis from malignant melanoma found in the literature [22, 23], with the major primary site being cutaneous and ocular [23]. Cases of melanoma metastasis from the nasal cavity to the pancreas have been reported [23]. The pri­mary lesion of melanoma may be difcult to identify. Studies have shown patients with metastatic melanoma to the pancreas who underwent pancreatic resection demonstrate a median time between the treatment of the primary melanoma and the detection of pancreatic metastases of 6years (range 14months to 34years) [22, 26]. A long disease-free interval of more than 2years after primary melanoma treatment was associated with improved survival in patients with intrapancreatic metasta­ses [26].
Diagnosis/Radiology/Pathology
Obtaining a pre-operative diagnosis of a metastatic pancreatic tumor can be difcult [27]. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan has a high sensitivity and specicity for detection of metastasis from malignant mela­noma [28]. On contrast-enhanced CT and MRI imaging, metastatic lesions from malignant melanoma demonstrate hypervascularity and rim enhancement [23, 29]. Metastatic melanoma lesions will demonstrate hyperintensity on T1 MRI, an indi­cation of changes caused by the paramagnetic properties of melanin [30, 31]. Malignant melanoma may or may not show hyperenhancement on contrast­enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS), and the lack of characteristic ndings makes diagnosis of malignant melanoma by CE-EUS difcult [23, 32]. EUS reports of malignant melanoma to the pancreas have demonstrated hypoechoic, heteroge­nous lesions [33].
Pathological examination is necessary to conrm the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma to the pancreas. EUS-FNA with effective sampling and immunohisto­chemical analysis is important in providing a cytological and histological diagnosis [23]. EUS-FNA with rapid on-site evaluation provides effective sampling and allows a cytopathologist to ensure the samples are adequate for assessment [34]. Aspirate samples of melanoma are cellular and consist of noncohesive malignant­appearing cells with nuclear pleomorphism and prominent nucleoli admixed with malignant, pigmented epithelioid and spindle-shaped cells, and can include the presence of melanin [22]. Pathology reports of melanoma lesions in the pancreas have demonstrated normal pancreatic parenchyma inltrated with a tumor com­posed of sheets of heavily pigmented and atypical epithelioid cells with high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, eosinophilic cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei with marked pleomorphism, and numerous atypical mitoses [33]. On immunohistochem­ical analysis, the markers S100, Melan A, and HMB-45 have a reported 97–100%, 75–92%, and 69–93% sensitivity for identifying metastatic melanoma. S100 and
318
R. Mudgway et al.
Melan A have a reported 75–87% and 95–100% specicity, respectively [23, 35]. The era of precision medicine has found that approximately 29–66% of melanoma cases are positive for activating mutations in the BRAF gene, with the most com­mon mutation being the V600E substitution [22].
Treatment/Prognosis
Metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis with a median life expectancy of 6–12months in cases of gastrointestinal metastasis [33]. The prognosis of meta­static melanoma to the pancreas specically is unknown. Pancreatic resection for metastatic melanoma is controversial, and there are no guidelines for indications of pancreatic resection for metastatic melanoma cases [23]. As seen for all isolated pancreatic metastases, the benet of resection on overall and disease-free survival is not clearly established but may provide some benet in selected patients [36].
For melanoma, some studies have demonstrated prolonged survival after com­plete surgical resection of localized metastatic melanoma to the pancreas [23, 37,
38]. Pancreas-sparing pancreatectomies are limited due to the limited margins
obtained and the exclusion of a formal lymphadenectomy, thus the role of these procedures for isolated pancreatic metastases is not well dened [36]. Standard pancreatic resections, such as pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatec­tomy, are associated with signicant morbidity and may only offer the advantage of improved lymphadenectomy for resection of intrapancreatic metastases, though may provide control of the disease when indicated and adequately per­formed [36]. However, some authors advocate that non-standard pancreatic resections have an increased risk of early local recurrence and higher morbidity [39, 40]. A retrospective study on survival of patients with isolated pancreatic metastasis from malignant melanoma who underwent complete surgical resec­tion demonstrated a median survival and 5-year disease-free survival of 24months and 37%, respectively [38]. This was in comparison to patients with incomplete pancreatic resections who had a median survival of 8months and 5-year disease­free survival of 0% [38]. Cases of pancreatoduodenectomy prolonging survival over 5years for patients with metastatic melanoma to the pancreas have been reported [23, 36, 41].
The decision to perform pancreatic resection requires exhaustive pre-operative evaluation and staging, with critical assessment of peri-operative risks and the expected survival benet. Surgical resection should only be considered if complete resection is possible [36], yet surgical therapy may provide palliation in selected cases [42]. Systemic or targeted therapy for melanoma may provide prolonged sur­vival and less morbidity compared to surgical resection for intrapancreatic metasta­sis and almost always is considered around the planned resection. The role of systemic or targeted therapy in combination with surgical resection is yet to be determined.
18 Secondary Malignant Neoplasms
319

Sarcoma

Introduction/Epidemiology
Sarcomas are rare tumors with differentiation toward mesenchymal tissue and account for approximately 1% of all adult cancers [43]. Metastasis of sarcoma to the pancreas is extremely rare. Although limited, cases of sarcoma subtypes metastasiz­ing to the pancreas include those from primary osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, mes­enchymal chondrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, dermatobrosarcoma protuberans, synovial sarcoma, myxobrosarcoma, and solitary brous tumors [4450]. Most sarcomas preferentially metastasize via the vascular system rather than the lym­phatic system, and the most frequent sites of metastatic sarcoma are the lung and bone [51]. The connective interspaces and cavities in which tumor cells can become entrapped, such as the peritoneum, provide another possible route of metastatic dis­semination of sarcoma [52]. The median overall survival for metastatic sarcoma ranges from 12 to 18months from time of diagnosis [53]. Unlike other forms of cancer, the prognosis of a sarcoma depends on its grade rather than its specic his­tological type [51].
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in all age-groups, and the highest risk period for onset coincides with the adolescent growth spurt (10–14years old in females, 15–19years old in males) [45]. Distant metastasis of osteosarcoma occurs in 10–20% of patients [45]. Incidence rates of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma are similar between men and women, with the highest incidence in the second and third decades of life [54]. Approximately 20% of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma cases have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis [55]. Dermatobrosarcoma protuberans has a higher incidence in men and commonly occurs between 20 and 50years of age [48]. Metastasis of dermatobrosarcoma protuberans occurs in 1–6% of patients, and the brosarcomatous variant has a 15% risk of distant metastasis [56, 57]. Synovial sarcoma metastasizes in 50% of patients [58]. Of the three subtypes of synovial sarcoma (monophasic, biphasic, and poorly differentiated), the poorly differentiated subtype is associated with early recurrence and metastasis [59].
Diagnosis/Radiology/Pathology
As is the case with other forms of pancreatic metastases, patients with sarcoma metastasis to the pancreas may be asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis or may present with generalized abdominal pain. Metastatic sarcoma lesions of the pan­creas are often incidentally found on imaging. CT (Fig.18.3) or MRI (Fig.18.4) is recommended for radiologic evaluation [60]. PET-CT can demonstrate uorodeox­yglucose (FDG) uptake in the pancreas [48]. Osteosarcoma metastasis to the pan­creas may demonstrate the characteristic calcied lesion of osteosarcoma, but some
320
Fig. 18.3 Contrast­enhanced CT scan of osteosarcoma metastasis to the pancreas. A retroperitoneal, mixed cystic and solid mass with central calcications centered on the lesser sac is demonstrated
R. Mudgway et al.
lesions may be indistinguishable from primary pancreatic malignancies and cystic masses have been reported [45]. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma may demonstrate granular irregular calcications with a surrounding hypodense tumor on CT scan, and low-intensity calcied areas surrounded by a high-intensity tumor on T2-weighted MRI [46].
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ne needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) to obtain tissue samples for histological and immunohistochemical analysis (Fig.18.5) can aid in the diagnosis. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is histologically characterized by poorly differentiated small round cells with an abrupt transition to hyaline cartilage [60]. Leiomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma demonstrate proliferation of spindle­shaped cells with nuclear atypia on histology [47, 49]. Mesenchymal chondrosar­coma is typically positive for NKX2.2, CD99, S100, and SOX9 tumor markers on immunohistochemical stains [61]. CD99 is the most commonly reported marker associated with Ewing sarcoma [50]. Other markers associated with Ewing sarcoma
ab
18 Secondary Malignant Neoplasms
Fig. 18.4 Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography scan of osteosarcoma metastasis to the pancreas. A large, mixed cystic and solid mass lesion originating from the superior aspect of the pancreatic tail and involving the lesser sac with associated edema of the pancreatic tail is demonstrated
321
Fig. 18.5 Metastatic, high-grade osteosarcoma involving the pancreas at 10X magnication (a) and 20X magnication (b). Osteosarcoma extends into the pancreatic parenchyma. There is peri­neural invasion and perivascular invasion. Figure18.3b includes the presence of malignant osteoid
322
R. Mudgway et al.
include neuron-specic antigen, vimentin, and synaptophysin [50]. Leiomyosarcoma is typically positive for α-smooth muscle actin and vimentin on immunohistochemi­cal analysis [47]. Dermatobrosarcoma protuberans will be positive for vimentin and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) [48]. Synovial sarcoma has been found to be positive for BCL2, CD99, and cytokeratin on immunohistochem­istry and may demonstrate evidence of SS18 gene rearrangement by break-apart uorescence in situ hybridization [49].
Treatment/Prognosis
The mainstay of treatment for localized sarcoma is complete surgical resection with or without radiation [53]. For metastatic sarcoma, the mainstay of treatment is chemotherapy, and there are an increasing number of systemic therapy options available [62]. Other treatment options for metastatic sarcoma include surgery, radiation, ablation, embolization, and immunotherapy [53]. There is no standard treatment for sarcoma metastasis to the pancreas. Tumor size and extent of tumor invasion to surrounding tissues and structures contribute to treatment approach and survival. The role of surgical resection for sarcoma metastasis to the pancreas is not clearly dened, and treatment regimen should be based on a multidisci­plinary approach on an individual basis. For peripancreatic lesions minimally abutting the pancreatic parenchyma, enucleation may be considered [49]. However, involvement of the pancreatic ducts or larger lesion size may warrant pancreatectomy. Formal pancreatic resections, such as distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, have been reported for resection of osteosarcoma metastasis to the pancreas [45]. Most reports of treatment for mesenchymal chondrosarcoma metastasis to the pancreas consisted of surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy [46]. The optimal chemotherapy regimen is not well established. Radiation therapy has also been reported [55]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy fol­lowed by pancreatoduodenectomy has been reported for metastatic synovial sar­coma to the pancreas [49]. A single-institution analysis found that factors associated with long-term survival (more than 3years) included isolated pancre­atic metastasis, absence of prior recurrence, >3-year interval between resection of the primary tumor and development of primary metastasis, and if the primary tumor was renal cell carcinoma [63].
For Ewing sarcoma, patients with localized disease have a 5-year overall survival of approximately 70%.On the other hand, metastatic disease has a reported 5-year overall survival between 9% and 41% [64]. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma has a 5-year overall survival rate of 51% [46]. Synovial sarcoma has a 5-year overall sur­vival rate of 36–76%. Further studies are needed to evaluate the overall survival benet of pancreatic metastasectomy for sarcoma.
18 Secondary Malignant Neoplasms
323

Conclusion

Secondary malignant neoplasms of the pancreas are rare and account for approxi­mately 1–5% of all pancreatic malignancies [2, 3, 7, 10, 65]. The most common primary malignant tumor site is of renal origin, followed by colorectal tumors. Metastasis of melanoma and sarcoma to the pancreas is even less common. Given the rarity of secondary malignant neoplasms to the pancreas, data to provide con­sensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of these metastatic neoplasms is limited. Most reports of metastases to the pancreas are single patient case reports or single-institution case reviews, yet multi-institutional reviews of published litera­ture have been performed in attempts to summarize these rare diagnoses.

References

1. Ma Y, Yang J, Qin K, et al. Resection of pancreatic metastatic renal cell carcinoma: expe­rience and long-term survival outcome from a large center in China. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24(6):686–93.
2. Shin TJ, Song C, Jeong CW, etal. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas: clinical features and treatment outcome. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123(1):204–13.
3. Cheong D, Rho SY, Kim JH, Kang CM, Lee WJ.Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for renal cell carcinoma metastasized to ampulla of Vater: a case report and literature review. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018;22(1):83–9.
4. Kitade H, Yanagida H, Yamada M, etal. Pylorus-preserving total pancreatectomy for meta­static renal cell carcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2015;9:212.
5. Tosoian JJ, Cameron JL, Allaf ME, etal. Resection of isolated renal cell carcinoma metas­tases of the pancreas: outcomes from the Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):542–8.
6. Ballarin R, Spaggiari M, Cautero N, etal. Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the state of the art. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(43):4747–56.
7. Cheng SK, Chuah KL.Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(6):598–602.
8. Malleo G, Salvia R, Maggino L, etal. Long-term outcomes after surgical resection of pancre­atic metastases from renal clear-cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(6):3100–8.
9. Schwarz L, Sauvanet A, Regenet N, etal. Long-term survival after pancreatic resection for renal cell carcinoma metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):4007–13.
10. Jo S, Yang IJ, Song S.Surgery for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the pancreatic head: a case report and literature review. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019;23(1):91–5.
11. Pannala R, Hallberg-Wallace KM, Smith AL, etal. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ne needle aspiration cytology of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas: a multi-center experi­ence. Cytojournal. 2016;13:24.
12. Sellner F, Thalhammer S, Klimpnger M.Isolated pancreatic metastases of renal cell cancer: genetics and epigenetics of an unusual tumour entity. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(6):1539.
13. Benhaim R, Oussoultzoglou E, Saeedi Y, Mouracade P, Bachellier P, Lang H. Pancreatic metastasis from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: outcome of an aggressive approach. Urology. 2015;85(1):135–40.