Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3644_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
57 Мб
Скачать
1Embryological and Anatomical Introduction20
Fig. 1.24. Subpial space:in­flammation. Inflammatory cells (P,polymorphonuclear leukocyte; L,lymphocyte;M, monocyte/macrophage) enter the subarachnoid space or the subpial space from the veins (right) and are then distrib­uted into the perivascular spaces of meningeal vessels. There is little penetration into the perivascular spaces of the brain
Fig. 1.25. Subpial space:tu­mors. Leukemic or primary cerebral lymphoma cells (L) enter the subarachnoid and subpial spaces from the ves­sels and form a dense retic­ulin network. Cells penetrate the brain either by direct inva­sion or along perivascular spaces. Carcinoma (Ca)and malignant melanoma cells may remain in the subarach­noid space or they may pene­trate the subpial spaces and pass along perivascular spaces into the central nervous sys­tem. Carcinoma cells may also penetrate directly through the glia limitans into the brain
1.2 Leptomeninges
MRI with gadolinium enhancement (Bradley and Bydder 1990) has proved to be of great value in detecting the two major pathologies of the leptomeninges, i.e., inflammation and invasion by neoplastic cells (Weller 1990). Meningeal enhancement has been reported in a number of different conditions, including tuberculous meningitis (Kioumehr et al.
1994), Lyme disease (Demaerel 1994),and primary meningeal lymphoma (Berciano et al. 1996); MRI appears to be more suitable than computed tomography (CT) for the identification of leptomeningeal metastases, particularly in the spinal cord (Chamberlain et al. 1990).
Leptomeninges cover the surface of the brain and spinal cord as well as the nerve roots and blood vessels within the subarachnoid space (Weller
1995). The outer, arachnoid mater,is composed of multiple layers of lep­tomeningeal cells, which form an impermeable barrier to cerebrospinal fluid (Alcolado et al.1988). Separating the arachnoid and pia mater is the subarachnoid space containing cerebrospinal fluid and major arteries and veins supplying the central nervous system. Delicate ligaments and perforated sheets of leptomeninges traverse the subarachnoid space, forming compartments filled with cerebrospinal fluid.
Sheet-like and filiform trabeculae traversing the subarachnoid space are composed of bundles of collagen fibers and a thin outer coating of leptomeningeal cells (Weller 1995; Alcolado et al. 1988; Hutchings and We ller 1986).Blood vessels within the subarachnoid space are suspended by such trabeculae, which have a structure similar to the major dorsal and ventral ligaments of the spinal cord and the dentate ligaments (Nicholas and Weller 1988).
The pia mater (Alcolado et al. 1988) is a delicate sheet, often only one cell thick; it is in contact with the surface of the brain, spinal cord, and nerve roots. Pia follows the gyri and sulci of the cerebral hemispheres and the folia of the cerebellum and closely invests the surface of the spinal cord.It is separated from the surface of the brain by the subpial pace and, as it is reflected onto the surface of blood vessels in the subarachnoid space, pia mater separates the subpial space from the subarachnoid space.
Individual cells of the pia mater are joined by desmosomes and gap junctions (Alcolaclo et al. 1988; Spray et al. 1991),and they form a desig­nated interface between the cerebrospinal fluid of the subarachnoid space and the surface of the brain (Feuer 1991).The pia mater appears to act as an active barrier, and its cells actively pinocytose particulate mat­ter and contain enzymes such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (Kaplan
1981) and glutamine synthetase (Feuer 1991),which degrade neurotrans­mitters. Growth factors such as transforming growth factor b (TGFb) have also been identified in leptomeningeal cells (Johnson et al. 1992).
21Leptomeninges
1.3 Subpial Space
1.3.1 Anatomy
The anatomy of the subpial space is summarized in Fig. 1.19.The subpial space is normally difficult to discern with light microscopy and was not well recognized as a separate compartment until ultrastructural studies (Huntchings 1986) confirmed that it was bound on one side by a complete sheet of pia mater and on the other by the glia limitans (Alcolado et al. 1988; Huntchings and Weller 1986; Zhang et al. 1990).
As shown in Fig. 1.19, the pia mater is reflected onto the surface of ar­teries and veins in the subarachnoid space and coats collagenous trabec­ulae extending from the arachnoid to the pia mater.A sheath of pia mater cells extends from the deep aspect of the pia mater proper to accompany arteries into the brain, but this sheath is either incomplete or absent around veins (Zhang et al.1990).
The perivascular space formed by this tube-like insertion of pia mater appears to be a major pathway for the drainage of interstitial fluid from the brain into the perivascular spaces of the leptomeningeal arteries and thence into the subarachnoid space (Weller et al. 1992). With the barrier and enzymatic properties of the pia mater mentioned above, the sheath of pia mater may also form a regulatory interface separating blood ves­sels and their nerve supplies from the surrounding brain tissue.
The glia limitans is composed of compacted astrocyte processes, often joined by gap junctions (Peters and Feldman 1976). A basement mem­brane coats the astrocytic component of the glia limitans and separates it from the small collagen fibers that form a web-like matrix on the surface of the brain.
Over the surface of the cerebral hemispheres,the subpial space largely contains arterioles (Fig. 1.20), small veins (Fig. 1.21) and bundles of col­lagen of varying size, dissociated pia mater cells, and occasional inflam­matory cells.
Bundles of collagen fibers extend from the trabeculae that cross the subarachnoid space and expand in a fan-like manner into the subpial space (Fig. 1.19), apparently forming an anchor for the trabecula (Alcola­do et al. 1988).Similar anchorage is seen in the arachnoid mater (Weller 1995; Alcolado et al. 1988). Arterioles within the subpial space are fine branches of the major arteries in the subarachnoid space. They have smooth muscle coats of varying thickness and an outer coating of lep­tomeningeal (pia mater) cells. Small veins in the subpial space, on the other hand, are larger in diameter and have thin walls with few smooth muscle cells and no outer coating of pia mater cells.
The subpial space of the spinal cord contains a thicker layer of collagen bundles (Nicholas and Weller 1988), as seen in the scanning electron mi­crograph in Fig. 1.22. This thick layer of collagen is continuous with the dentate ligaments laterally and may play a role in stabilizing the cord (Nicholas and Weller 1988).
The nerve supply of the leptomeninges and the vessels in the subpial space has been mainly investigated at the level of the spinal cord in exper­imental animals.Innervation of the pia and leptomeningeal ligaments by
1Embryological and Anatomical Introduction22
small sensory fibers appears to be derived from ventral roots (Risling et al. 1994;Parke and Whalen 1993), although this origin is disputed (Karls­son and Hildebrand 1993).
Over the surface of the cerebral cortex, some blood vessels may be sup­plied by branches from cortical neurons (McKenzie 1990). Small nerve branches consisting of myelinated and nonmyelinated fibers can be iden­tified within the spinal leptomeninges of the spinal cord in humans (Nicholas and Weller,unpublished observations).
1.3.2 Relationships of the Subpial Space
Although the subpial space is separated from the subarachnoid space by the pia mater, it is continuous with the perivascular spaces of the central nervous system.A sheath of pia mater surrounds the arteries as they en­ter the brain and divides the periarterial space into two compartments (Fig. 1.19). It is probably the inner space between the pia mater sheath and the vessel that is the conduit for fluid drainage (Weller 1992), but which of these spaces should be called the Virchow Robin space is un­clear. The relationships of the subpial space are particularly important when considering pathological reactions within the space.
1.3.3 Pathology
1.3.3.1 Inflammation
Inflammatory leptomeningitis may be due to a number of different types of organisms or may even be due to the escape into the cerebrospinal flu­id of sterile inflammatory agents,such as cholesterol or keratin,from epi­dermoid cysts or craniopharyngiomas. A variety of blood-borne cells may be associated with inflammation of the leptomeninges,and the time course and nature of the inflammation depend upon the stimulating agent (Weller 1990).
Pyogenic bacterial infections, such as streptococcal or staphylococcal leptomeningitis, result in exudation of large numbers of polymorphonu­clear leukocytes into the subarachnoid and subpial spaces. In the later stages of infection, when the polymorphonuclear leukocytes have ingest­ed bacteria and died, macrophages derived from blood monocytes (Fig. 1.23) replace and ingest the dead polymorphs, dead bacteria, fibrin, and tissue debris. Macrophages generally arrive 2–3 days after the initial infection.
The pattern of inflammation in viral meningitis is mainly that of lym­phocyte exudation into the subarachnoid and subpial spaces; in fungal and tuberculous infections, there is granulomatous inflammation in ad­dition to lymphocyte infiltration, often with multinucleate macrophage­derived giant cells and areas of caseation (Weller 1990).
The time course and intensity of breakdown of the blood–brain barri­er is different in each of these cases. In purulent leptomeningitis, signifi­cant alteration in the blood-brain barrier may only last for a few days to
23Inflammation
1week before the barrier is restored. In more chronic infections, such as tuberculosis, disruption of the blood-brain barrier may last much longer.
Inflammatory cells, polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes, or lymphocytes pass from the blood into either the subarachnoid space or the subpial space through the walls of veins (Fig. 1.24). Although in the rest of the body most of the traffic of inflammatory cells is through the walls of postcapillary venules, they escape from large veins into the sub­arachnoid space.Traffic of inflammatory cells through the walls of small­er veins in the subpial space may be an important route for cells to enter both the subpial and the subarachnoid spaces.
Figure 1.24 shows how inflammatory cells entering the subpial space may be distributed along perivascular spaces of arteries and veins in the subarachnoid space and penetrate the pia mater (Krahn 1981) to enter the subpial space. By expanding the subpial space, the relationships between the pia mater and the glia limitans become clearer by light microscopy, and the presence of a leptomeningeal sheath around blood vessels in the subarachnoid space is clearly demonstrated (Fig. 1.23).
Although there is a connection between the subpial space and perivas­cular spaces within the brain, inflammatory cells rarely extend far into the perivascular spaces of the central nervous system.It appears that the pia mater is an effective barrier to the spread of bacteria into the subpial space. The pia mater also forms a barrier to the spread of red blood cells from the subarachnoid space, and blood does not usually penetrate the perivascular spaces of the brain following subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hutchings and Weller 1986).
Hemorrhage does occur in the subpial space, particularly in infants (Friede 1972). Subpial hemorrhage can be distinguished from subarach­noid hemorrhage, since subpial hemorrhage usually remains closely confined and spreads in the subpial space into sulci rather than filling the sulci, as occurs in subarachnoid hemorrhage.
1.3.3.2 Tumor
Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier and gadolinium enhancement is well recognized in association with poorly differentiated glial tumors, such as glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma, as is the absence of a blood-brain barrier in association with solid metastatic car­cinomas and primary lymphomas in the nervous system (Bradley and Bydder 1990).
Enhancement due to breakdown of the blood-brain barrier also occurs in carcinomatous, lymphomatous, and leukemic meningitis and is well demonstrated by MRI (Berciano et al.1996; Chamberlain et al. 1990).
Neoplastic cells enter the subarachnoid and subpial spaces by pene­trating blood vessel walls. However,leukemic and lymphoma cells show a different pattern of invasion from carcinomas. Although leukemic involvement of the central nervous system is common, it is usually only primary lymphomas of the central nervous system that invade the parenchyma of the brain and spinal cord (Weller 1990; Berciano et al.
1996).
1Embryological and Anatomical Introduction24
Leukemic and lymphoma cells in the subarachnoid and subpial spaces induce the formation of a delicate network of reticulin (small collagen; Fig. 1.25). From the subpial space,cells penetrate the glia limitans and in­vade the surface of the brain or penetrate deeply into the parenchyma along perivascular spaces (Fig. 1.25). Carcinomas and malignant melanoma,on the other hand, invade the subarachnoid space but may be prevented either by the pia or the glia limitans from directly invading the brain. Some carcinomas remain almost totally confined to the subarach­noid space with minimal invasion of the brain,whereas other carcinomas and malignant melanomas enter the subpial space and penetrate deep into the brain along perivascular spaces (Fig. 1.25).
Direct invasion through the glia limitans is also seen in some carcino­mas. Such invasion may increase the thickness of the zone of blood–brain barrier breakdown and thus enhancement on MRI. The mechanisms of blood–brain barrier breakdown in carcinomatous meningitis are not entirely clear.
Once the carcinoma has entered the subpial and arachnoid spaces, it appears that the tumor cells continue to influence the characteristics of blood vessels in the region, as with solid metastases. Carcinoma cells are known to produce growth factors (Wiestler 1994),which may modify the permeability characteristics of the brain vessels in the region of lepto­meningeal metastases.
The significance of the subpial space lies mainly in the blood vessels that traverse it,in its proximity to the surface of the brain and in its con­nections with the perivascular spaces of the central nervous system. For the most part, inflammatory cells entering the subpial space pass into the subarachnoid space rather than into the brain. In many cases of lepto­meningitis, there is only a microglial reaction in the surface regions of the brain rather than direct invasion by inflammatory cells. The picture is rather different in carcinomatous or lymphomatous meningitis,in which invasion of the surface of the brain is as common as invasion of the perivascular spaces.
25Tumor
2.1 Introduction 28
2.2 From Adults to Children 28
2.3 Vascular Lesion Types and Disease Groups 31
2.3.1 Nonproliferative Lesions 34
2.3.1.1 Arteriovenous Lesions 34
2.3.1.2 Isolated Brain AVMs 35
2.3.1.3 CAVFs 39
2.3.1.4 VGAMs 39
2.3.1.5 Cerebrofacial Arteriovenous Metameric Syndromes 39
2.3.1.6 Dural Lesions 41
2.3.1.7 Telangiectasias 41
2.3.1.8 The Blue Rubber-Bleb Nevus or Bean Syndrome 41
2.3.1.9 Venous Malformations (Cavernomas) 44
2.3.1.10 Venous Angiomas or Developmental Venous Anomalies 45
2.3.1.11 Cerebrofacial Venous Metameric Syndrome
(Formerly Sturge-Weber Syndrome) 47
2.3.1.12 Induced Pial Shunts 47
2.3.1.13 Spinal Cord AVM 48
2.3.1.14 General Conclusions on Vascular Lesions 48
2.3.2 Proliferative Lesions 49
2.3.2.1 PHACE or PHACES 51
2.3.2.2 Diffuse Angiodysplasia 51
2.4 Classification of CAVMs by Age Group 56
2.4.1 Fetal Age 56
2.4.2 Neonatal Age 59
2.4.3 Infancy 59
2.4.4 After 2 Years 62
2.5 Classification by Symptom Group 63
2.5.1 Congestive Cardiac Manifestations 63
2.5.2 Hydrodynamic Disorders 64
2.5.3 Melting-Brain Syndrome 73
2.6 Clinical Evaluation Scores 77
2.7 Revised Concept of the Congenital Nature
of Vascular Malformations 85
2.7.1 Genetics 85
2.7.1.1 Familial Hemiplegic Migraine 85
2.7.1.2 Familial Cerebral Aneurysms 86
2.7.1.3 PKD1 and Bourneville PDK1-PDK2 86
2.7.1.4 Ehlers-Danlos Type IV 87
2.7.1.5 Multiple Cutaneous Mucous Venous Malformations,
Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome 87
2.7.1.6 CADASIL 87
2.7.1.7 Familial Paragangliomas 87
2.7.1.8 Familial Cavernomas 87
2.7.1.9 Neurofibromatosis-1 and Other Collagen Diseases 88
2.7.1.10 Hemorrhagic Hereditary Telangiectasia
or Rendu-Osler-Weber Disease 88
2Introduction and General Comments Regarding Pediatric Intracranial Arteriovenous Shunts
2.8 Vascular Remodeling and the Congenital Nature of Arteriovenous Shunts 93
2.8.1 Endothelium as a Sensor and Transducer of Signals 94
2.8.2 Endothelium-Specific Receptor-Coupled Event 95
2.8.3 Endothelium and Mediator-Effector Molecules Involved with Remodeling 95
2.8.4 Role of Matrix Modulators in Vascular Remodeling 95
2.8.5 Clinical Implications of Vascular Remodeling 95
2.1 Introduction
Since 1982, more than 3,000 patients with cerebral arteriovenous mal­formations (CAVMs) have been referred to the three authors, including 800 children under the age of 16 years. Our active involvement in the management of vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations (VGAMs) started in 1984; since then, 350 children with VGAMs have been seen by the group in Bicêtre Hospital alone, where it accounts for 50% of total pediatric intradural intracranial AVS patients. More than 25 new VGAM patients are now referred to us each year. Over the past 20 years, these centers combined have collected about 500 VGAMs. In comparison, the two historically important series describing the surgical management of this disease show referral patterns of roughly one new patient with VGAM per year: the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto (29 patients over 30 years) and the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Sydney (13 patients in 10 years). It is also of interest to note that in these surgical series,VGAM represented 34% of all the CAVM managed in children.
A survey on the European continent (Raimondi 1992) showed that in the year 1989 in a population of 530 million people, 189 surgical proce­dures were performed for vascular disease in children, i.e., about one procedure a year per 3 million people. Most active neurosurgical centers in Europe perform between 10 and 15 procedures for this disease in chil­dren, which in most cases consists of cavernoma removal. In our inter­ventional centers, 100–170 pediatric neurovascular procedures are per­formed each year, mostly AVMs. The large number of patients seen does not reflect a true population profile with any epidemiological signifi­cance,but rather our status as a quaternary referral center for Europe and North America. In view of the distances involved, only the more complex cases tend to be referred while the simpler ones are more likely managed locally.Our current practice and management reflects both the improve­ment in fetal and neonatal diagnosis and care of children with neurovas­cular disease as well as the progressive shift toward endovascular man­agement in the treatment of children with brain AVSs.
2.2 From Adults to Children
Cerebral arteriovenous (AV) shunts have different characteristics in chil­dren than in adults. Children can have multifocal lesions,induced remote AV shunts (Garcia Monaco 1991c; Iizuka 1992),large venous ectasias, high­flow lesions,and single hole arteriovenous fistulas (Weon et al. 2005;Yoshi-
2Introduction and General Comments Regarding Pediatric Intracranial Arteriovenous Shunts28
da et al. 2004),venous thrombosis,brain atrophy, and systemic phenomena (Cronqvist 1972; Cumming 1980; Willinsky et al. 1990a). Conversely, high­flow angiopathic changes are rare in children, as are flow-related arterial aneurysms (Lasjaunias 1988a), while proximal occlusive arteriopathy is more frequent.For this reason,management protocols derived from expe­rience in adults should not be applied to the pediatric population. In par­ticular, adult-based classifications and AVM grading according to the ex­pected surgical outcome is particularly inappropriate in children,in whom (a) cerebral eloquence is difficult to assess,particularly in the first few years of life, (b) most lesions are fistulas or multifocal, (c) drainage usually affects the entire venous system,and (d) the potential for recovery is different.It is often believed that the adult type of classification and grading of AVMs in­dicates or in some way corresponds to the natural evolution of the lesion, and, although unintentionally, this has created a significant amount of mis­understanding and confusion.A difficult to operate AVM (i. e.,a high-grade AVM) is not necessarily a dangerous one for the patient if not operated up­on or more dangerous for the patient than a low-grade AVM. In addition to the conventional objectives,the decision-making process in children must take into consideration additional specific details pertaining to the veins and the myelinization process.Thereafter,staged partial treatment of pro­gressive deficits associated with congested cerebral veins,poorly controlled seizures,hemorrhagic episodes with or without specific changes upstream or downstream from the AVM, or headaches in children without ventricu­lar enlargement or macrocrania may all represent good indications for treatment.Neurocognitive evaluation is the key follow-up criterion in chil­dren even without deficits, hemorrhage, or seizures, as it helps in the assessment of treatment quality and success. Failure to obtain a normal maturation process may constitute a therapeutic failure if the optimum moment for intervention has been missed (therapeutic window).
When discussing CAVMs or vascular diseases in children, one might wonder whether it represents an artificially created grouping. AVMs in children are primarily characterized by diagnostic and therapeutic diffi­culties specific to the population in which they occur. CAVM corresponds more to a clinical group than a nosological one. However, some rare le­sions (see Chaps. 4,7,12, this volume) are exclusively encountered in chil­dren, mainly in neonates and infants.
In addition, the anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the neo­natal and infant brain and the immaturity of its systemic flexibility (hy­drovenous) create a specific group of nonhemorrhagic symptoms and therapeutic challenges. This vulnerability means that the lesion rapidly becomes lethal or creates a disabling state,whereas a similar lesion in an adult might produce only few symptoms.
The clinical characteristics of CAVMs in children are therefore related to the children themselves and their specific anatomy and physiology. Children are not small adults and the therapeutic challenges cannot be measured in terms of size of the target, but is related to our capability to understand the other structures and processes involving the brain and its vasculature and anticipate the potential interferences between the CAVM and the maturing brain.
For a long time, vascular lesions in children were divided into nonpro­liferative and proliferative lesions. The former group comprises vascular
29From Adults to Children
2Introduction and General Comments Regarding Pediatric Intracranial Arteriovenous Shunts30
Scheme 2.1. Role of structural weaknesses in disease development
Scheme 2.2. Vascular diseases according to the arterio-veno-lymphatic tree