Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4434_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
58 Мб
Скачать
2 Principle ofHead andNeck Surgery andtheImportance ofAnatomical Characteristics
57
oropharyngectomy. Oral Oncol. 2019;99:104450.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104450.
9. Crosetti E, Arrigoni G, Manca A, Caracciolo A, Bertotto I, Succo G. 3D Exoscopic surgery (3Des) for transoral oropharyngectomy. Front Oncol. 2020;10:16. Published 2020 Jan 31. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00016.
10. Gun R, Durmus K, Kucur C, Carrau RL, Ozer E. Transoral surgical anatomy and clinical con­siderations of lateral oropharyngeal wall, para­pharyngeal space, and tongue base. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(3):480–5. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0194599815625911.
11. Mirapeix RM, Tobed Secall M, Pollán Guisasola C, etal. Anatomic landmarks in transoral oropharyngeal surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(2):e101–6. https://
doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004935.
12. Dallan I, Seccia V, Faggioni L, et al. Anatomical landmarks for transoral robotic tongue base surgery: comparison between endoscopic, external and radio­logical perspectives. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(1):3–
10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276- 012- 0983- 2.
13. Cohen DS, Low GM, Melkane AE, etal. Establishing a danger zone: an anatomic study of the lingual artery in base of tongue surgery. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(1):110–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/
lary.26048.
14. Mat Lazim N, Baharudin B. Risk factors and etio­pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In: Abdullah B, Balasubramanian A, Lazim NM, editors. An evidence-based approach to the management of nasopharyngeal cancer. Amsterdam: Academic Press;
2020. p. 11–30. ISBN: 9780128144039. https://doi.
org/10.1016/B978- 0- 12- 814403- 9.00002- 1.
15. Chintamani D. Editorial: “ten commandments” of safe and optimum thyroid surgery. Indian J Surg. 2010;72(6):421–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s12262- 010- 0217- y.
16. Irkorucu O. Zuckerkandl tubercle in thyroid sur­gery: is it a reality or a myth? Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;7:92–6. Published 2016 Apr 6. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.03.030.
17. Costanzo M, Caruso LA, Veroux M, Messina DC, Marziani A, Cannizzaro MA.Il lobo di Zuckerkandl: faro del nervo laringeo ricorrente [The lobe of Zuckerkandl: an important sign of recurrent laryngeal nerve]. Ann Ital Chir. 2005;76(4):337–41.
18. Miller FR. Surgical anatomy of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2003;36(1):221–227, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0030- 6665(02)00132- 9.
19. Subramanian S, Chiesa F, Lyubaev V, Aidarbekova A, Brzhezovskiy V.The evolution of surgery in the man­agement of neck metastases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27(2):309–16.
20. Chintamani. Ten commandments of safe and optimum neck dissections for cancer. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s12262- 015- 1277- 9.
21. Coskun HH, Medina JE, Robbins KT, et al. Current philosophy in the surgical management of neck metastases for head and neck squamous cell carci­noma. Head Neck. 2015;37(6):915–26. https://doi.
org/10.1002/hed.23689.
22. Kalaiarasi R, Kiran AS, Vijayakumar C, Venkataramanan R, Manusrut M, Prabhu R. Anatomical features of intratemporal course of facial nerve and its variations. Cureus. 2018;10(8):e3085. Published 2018 Aug 2. https://doi.
org/10.7759/cureus.3085.
23. Ni X, Zhang J. Pediatric otolaryngology–head and neck surgery in China: present situation and future prospects. Pediatr Invest. 2019;3:137–40.
24. Swift AC.Principles and practice of head and neck oncology. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(11):566–7.
Signicance ofAnatomical Versus Surgical Landmarks inHead andNeck Surgery
NorhazaMat Lazim , ZulIzharMohd Ismail, MuhamadNorFirdausAb Rahman, andBaharudinAbdullah
3

3.1 Introduction

Head and neck surgery entails multiple proce­dures involved with important structures of the head and neck region. The organs for breathing, hearing, taste, vision, and swallowing all reside in the head region. In the neck, there are multiple neural and vascular structures that are at signi­cant risk during surgery. This includes the lower four cranial nerves, carotid artery, internal jugu­lar vein, larynx, oesophagus, thyroid glands, and so forth. In order to perform an effective and safe surgery while minimizing the morbidity, an oper­ating surgeon should have a sound anatomical knowledge as well as rened surgical skills. In addition, the availability of instruments and pro­active communications with staffs would facili­tate an efcient surgery (Fig. 3.1). Inadvertent injury to aforementioned critical structures could lead to serious and fatal complications. The avail­ability of imaging tools like CT scan (Fig.3.2) and other diagnostic optical endoscopy allows
N. Mat Lazim (*) · B. Abdullah Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia e-mail: norhaza@usm.my
Z. I. Mohd Ismail · M. N. F. Ab Rahman Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
surgical mapping that would minimize surgery­related morbidity.
A variety of methods are available to enhance the anatomical knowledge of young trainee and junior surgeons practising in head and neck sur­gery. These range across cadaveric dissection, simulation training, head and neck online courses, and many more. An efcient way to consolidate anatomical knowledge and to link this awareness for better understanding of head and neck surgery is the new interdisciplinary hands-on course [1]. The 3D simulation cadaveric dissection is prob­ably the best way, as the head and neck’s detailed anatomical structures could be mapped on virtual reconstructive models. This will facilitate greater understanding of relevant surgical landmarks during the dissection process.
The neck region is a compartmental area with supercial and deep layers of fasciae dividing the region into many small spaces. All of these spaces have clinical and surgical importance. The deep space of the neck is crucial as multiple patholo­gies such as infection, tumour spread, neck node metastasis, and spread of disease could occur inside these spaces (Table3.1). For example, the poststyloid compartment of the parapharyngeal space is well known for the occurrence of pleo­morphic adenoma of the deep lobe of parotid glands and paragangliomas that originate from the last four cranial nerves or those that arise from sympathetic bre that overlies the carotid wall. Surgical access to parapharyngeal space is
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022 N. Mat Lazim et al. (eds.), Head and Neck Surgery : Surgical Landmark and Dissection Guide,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3854-2_3
59
60
N. Mat Lazim et al.
Enhanced knowledge on head & neck anatomy
Ability to identify surgical landmarks during specific surgical procedures
Fig. 3.1 Determining factors for a safe surgery
Well-equipped operating theatre room with competent assistant, paramedic & nurse
Effective communication with anaesthetist, patient and multidisciplinary team involvment
Requirements for a
safe and efficient head
& neck surgery
Nasal cavity
Nasopharynx
Maxillary sinus
Pterygoid muscle
Mastoid bone
Fig. 3.2 Identication of the structures visualized in the CT scan images such as nasopharynx, pterygoid muscle, maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, mastoid air cells, and adja-
cent critical structures is vital for preoperative surgical mapping
3 Signicance ofAnatomical Versus Surgical Landmarks inHead andNeck Surgery
Table 3.1 Clinical importance of deep spaces of head and neck region
Deep spaces of head and neck
1. Parapharyngeal space
2. Retropharyngeal space
3. Danger space • Spaces posterior to
4. Prevertebral space
5. Carotid space • Contains the neck nodes
6. Submandibular space
7. Masticator space • Tumour spread
Clinical and surgical importance
• Paraganglioma and deep lobe pleomorphic adenoma originate from this space
• Abscess formation
• Collection of abscess and infection
• Origin of deep neck infection (DNI)
• Nodes of Rouviere/ retropharyngeal nodes impact prognostication of NPC
retropharyngeal space
• At risk of airway obstruction in extensive cases
• Indicative of inoperability if tumour inltrated this space
especially on the IJV wall, at risk of neck metastasis recurrence
• At risk of infection like Ludwig’s angina, and in severe cases can cause airway obstruction
Fig. 3.3 Skin incision and landmarks have been drawn for a bilateral selective neck dissection. The landmarks include sternocleidomastoid muscle (scm), mandible (m), external jugular vein (ejv), and outline of skin incision (sil)
during surgery and lacks the detailed knowledge of anatomical structures of the related organs, the vessels, nerves, muscles, and other organs might be injured. Consequently, the risk of surgery will be higher. Many critical tumours are located in the head and neck and need to be addressed according to the principle of oncologic surgery. Therefore, surgeons should have a thorough knowledge of this critical region’s surgical anat­omy so that the tumour can be excised with free surgical margins and without compromising the adjacent structures. Of note, an inexperienced junior surgeon with fear of causing damage to
important structures may lead to inadequate sur­technically challenging and requires a thorough knowledge of the anatomical and surgical land­marks of these spaces. In addition, a meticulous surgical technique is necessary during dissection with regard to the preservation of the delicate neurovascular structures and its relation to the adjacent tissues, so that complications could be avoided.
The surgical plane is a plane of dissection which is used in relation to the tissues and organs, so that the normal structures can be preserved. In the surgery of malignant mass, the intention is to excise a tumour, leaving the muscles and the neu­rovascular tissues that are not affected by the tumour intact. In the majority of cases, if the dis­section continues in a correct plane, severe tissue damage is avoided, and bleeding can also be min­imized. If the surgeon loses the surgical planes
gical treatment efcacy, with a consequent risk of tumour persistence or recurrence [2].
During a neck surgical procedure, for instance a bilateral selective neck dissection for a tongue carcinoma, the surgeon should identify the land­marks of the neck structures which are ideally marked with a marker pen, before starting a skin incision (Fig. 3.3). This is a good practice in order to orientate the structures or tumoural mass dissection, so as to avoid the unnecessary bleed­ing or iatrogenic injury to neural structures.
In head and neck surgery, the subplatysmal ap is the simplest ap that is ideal for an illustra­tion for a teaching purpose, especially to the junior trainees in head and neck surgical oncol­ogy practice for attaining a right plane of dissec­tion during the surgery. In fact, it is a cornerstone ap for access and removal of signicant neck
61
62
Fig. 3.4 A subplatysmal skin ap (ssf) is raised and reected superiorly. The thicker the ap, the better it is for ap vascularization in order to avoid ap necrosis. The distal end of cut platysma is also shown (pm)
tumours such as thyroid tumour, laryngeal can­cer, and neck node metastases; submandibulec­tomy; and most of the excision of the pathology of neck region. All of these surgical procedures require the elevation of subplatysmal ap. Platysma is a supercial thin muscle that spans from the inferior border of mandible to clavicle. It criss-crosses the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) and is decient at the anterior and pos­terolateral parts of the neck (Fig.3.4). The vascu­lar supply to the ap is through the submental artery, a branch of facial artery, and suprascapu­lar artery, a branch from thyrocervical trunk. The thicker the ap, the better the vascular supply, hence less risk of developing ap necrosis.
Further dissection and skeletonization of the anterior border of SCM are required, so that it can be retracted laterally, thus exposing the carotid sheath. The dissection overlying the inter­nal jugular vein (IJV) and carotid artery equates level II, III, and IV neck dissection (Fig.3.5). The assistant nurse or surgeon should retract the man­dible superiorly with a cold instrument, while the surgeon applies traction inferiorly on the dis­sected mass (Fig.3.6). This technique of counter­traction and traction will facilitate neck dissection effortlessly.
The knowledge of anatomy and function of the nerves that innervate neck muscles may enable surgeons to avoid inadvertent injury. For example,
N. Mat Lazim et al.
Fig. 3.5 A subplatysmal skin ap (ssf) is raised exposing the sternocleidomastoid muscle (scm) and tissue at levels I, II, III, and IV.This is the extent of exposure required in selective neck dissection. The SCM is retracted laterally, in order to dissect the brofatty tissue and fascia overlying IJV (levels II, III, and IV). The distal end of cut platysma is also shown (pm)
Fig. 3.6 Mandible is retracted with the assistance of a nurse or surgeon to facilitate efcient dissection of bro­fatty tissues and neck node metastases. A good traction and countertraction allow a quick dissection and will shorten the operating time
ansa cervicalis is a loop of nerve that arises from cervical plexus, which lies supercial to the inter­nal jugular vein in the carotid triangle. It is the nerve that innervates the sternohyoid, sternothy­roid, and omohyoid muscles. Lesion to this nerve would result in paralysis of these muscles. In addition, the cervical plexus also gives rise to the cutaneous nerves of the neck, which are located supercially on the lateral neck muscles, namely the great auricular, posterior auricular, transverse cervical, and supraclavicular nerves. Lesion to any of these would result in paraesthesia to the skin areas supplied by the respective nerves.
Stemocleidomastoid muscle
Spinal accessory nerve
3 Signicance ofAnatomical Versus Surgical Landmarks inHead andNeck Surgery
Trapezius muscle
Clavicle
63
Stemum
Fig. 3.7 The course of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the posterior triangle or level V is critical for neck dis­section. SAN exits at upper two-thirds at the posterior
Another important nerve in the posterior tri­angle which is of importance is the spinal acces­sory nerve (SAN). The SAN lies 1–2cm superior to the exit point of cutaneous nerve branches from cervical plexus at the posterior border of SCM.This nerve runs in the posterior triangle of the neck or level V crossing the carotid sheath, SCM, and trapezius muscle in 45° angles (Fig.3.7). Several landmarks are being used to identify the SAN.These include
1. Erb’s point
2. SCM
3. Trapezius muscle
4. Transverse process of C2 vertebra
These landmarks allow the identication and preservation of SAN during neck dissection at level V region, as this nerve is located super­cially (Table3.2). Injury and traction of the SAN
border of SCM and enters the anterior border of trapezius at 5.0cm above the clavicle. The landmarks for identica­tion of SAN are C2 vertebrae and Erb’s point
cause signicant morbidity like frozen shoulder syndrome, which is characterized by limited arm abduction, painful scapular region, and inability to shrug the shoulder.
In the head and neck region, there is an exten­sive anastomotic network of the lower cranial nerves. The understanding of the neural intercom­munications of the skull base is vital in diagnos­ing and treating patients with pathology in this critical area [3]. Facial nerve, hypoglossal nerve, and vagus nerve are particularly important nerves that need to be recognized and preserved during the surgery. Injury to these nerves or inadvertent denervation during aggressive dissection causes signicant morbidity to patients as these nerves are involved in many critical functions of the facial-neck complex, such as mastication, swal­lowing, speech, and facial expression. Awareness of the anatomy of these neural connections would be especially useful in facial reconstructive sur-
64
N. Mat Lazim et al.
Table 3.2 Surgical landmarks of the spinal accessory nerves, cranial nerve XI
Surgical landmarks for SAN (CNXI) Description
1. Erb’s point The exit point of cutaneous nerve branches from cervical plexus at the posterior border of SCM.The SAN lies 1–2cm above this point
2. Transverse process of
cervical vertebra
3. Sternocleidomastoid
muscle
4. Trapezius muscle The SAN runs 5cm
5. Great auricular point The point of exit of
The SAN can be palpated over the transverse process, at level IIB neck as the nerve runs over this vertebra
The SAN pierces through this muscle at its superior one-third. It may also lie deep to this muscle
above the clavicle at the anterior border of trapezius, before piercing and supplying the muscle
great auricular nerve at the posterior border of sternocleidomastoid muscle. The SAN lies 1–2cm above this point
gery, neck dissection, and various nerve transfer procedures as well as in understanding the patho­physiology of various cranial, skull foundation, and neck disorders [4]. Hypoglossal nerve injury leads to tongue atrophy, fasciculation, and devia­tion of the tip of the tongue. Vagus nerve injury causes hoarseness of voice and aspiration, whereas facial nerve injury causes facial asymme­try. All of these complications will indenitely impair the patient’s quality of life.
3.2 Importance ofSurgical Landmarks
The knowledge on the anatomical and surgical landmarks will assist surgeons to perform the surgery with most minimum complication as
possible. During the surgery, dissection is started with the designing and drawing of the skin inci­sion together with other landmarks. For instance, during a tracheostomy, a skin incision drawing is placed at 2.0cm above the sternal edge. In addi­tion, the cricoid, thyroid, and hyoid cartilage locations are also identied and drawn. This is to ensure that tracheostomy is performed in the midline, thus avoiding the crucial vascular struc­tures such as the carotid artery and the laterally positioned IJV in the carotid sheath. A correct technique of tracheostomy would also prevent the development of post-surgical stenosis, which is due to the recurrence and would be very debilitating.
During the skin incision, surgeons need to anticipate the fascial layer of the neck that would be encountered during the procedure. The super­cial cervical fascia is encountered right after the elevation of platysma muscle. The pretracheal fas­cia layer is the next layer to be incised, exposing the strap muscles. Deep to the strap muscles is the thyroid gland, which needs to be retracted superi­orly. Once thyroid gland is retracted, the tracheal ring could be easily palpated and visualized. So, in essence, by knowing the order of the structures of the neck from supercial to deep, it would facili­tate a safe dissection and minimize complications such as active bleeding, muscle injury, or nerve transection. The ability to visualize the supercial musculoaponeurotic system and its relationship to crucial neurovascular structures allows surgeons to plan the operation and minimize post-operative complications [2]. As the surgical procedure is performed, crucial neural structure injury should be avoided as it can have a signicant impact on patient’s functions like swallowing, speech, breathing, and facial expression.
In addition, supercial skin lesion and its related surgery should also be performed with a sound knowledge of anatomical landmarks. Most skin surgical procedures are performed in sun- damaged areas of the face and head because of the development of skin tumour like basal cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma. Surgeons or dermatologists should have a very good knowl­edge of the important layers of epidermis, der­mis, and hypodermis in these areas so that they
3 Signicance ofAnatomical Versus Surgical Landmarks inHead andNeck Surgery
65
can perform an aesthetically safe skin surgical procedure.
3.3 Thyroid Surgery andRelated Surgical Landmarks
The thyroid mass surgery is one of the most com­mon neck pathologies that are managed by the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeon in selected centres. The surgical management of thyroid tumour is critical as it is involved with the preser­vation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), which innervates the intrinsic muscles of the lar­ynx (except the cricothyroid muscle). The mobil­ity of vocal cord is crucial for the normal voice production. Injury to the RLN will impair the vocal cord mobility, hence resulting in hoarse­ness of voice. This impairs patient’s effective communication and quality of life.
In the identication and safe dissection of the RLN, sufcient knowledge of its surgical anat­omy, clinical experience, and meticulous surgical
techniques are key factors. The RLN can be iden­tied during a thyroidectomy using four different approaches, depending on the type of thyroid growth and the surgeon’s choice. These approaches include the lateral, inferior, superior, and medial approaches [5]. It depends on the sur­geon’s preference and intraoperative ndings in choosing the type of surgical approach. The sur­gical landmarks that are commonly used during thyroid surgery include the laryngeal cartilages such as the thyroid, cricoid, hyoid bone, and also trachea. The easily palpable parts of laryngeal cartilages are, for instance, the inferior cornua of the thyroid cartilage, the thyroid cartilage inferior tubercle, and the most anterior portion of the cri­coid cartilage arch. These palpable landmarks have been recognized as critical landmarks dur­ing thyroid surgery (Fig.3.8). Of note, the dis­tances between these structures and the RLN entry point on the medial aspect of the cricoid cartilage arch have been recognized as a land­mark for the identication and preservation of recurrent laryngeal nerves [6].
Joll’s triangle
Trachea &
esophagus
Surgical
Inferior thyroid
artery
External laryngeal
nerve
Fig. 3.8 The critical structures encountered during a thyroid surgery
structures &
landmarks in
thyroid
surgery
Beahr’s triangle
Recurrent
laryngeal nerve
Parathyroid glands
Tracheoesophageal
groove
66
Left vagus nerve
Right vagus nerve
Right common carotid artery
N. Mat Lazim et al.
Thyroid gland
Left common carotid artery
Fig. 3.9 Anatomical relationship between vagus nerves, recurrent laryngeal nerves, arch of aorta, right subclavian artery, common carotid arteries, and thyroid glands
between the right and the left sides of the neck. At the point where the brachiocephalic artery is divided into two branches, the right RLN, which arises from the vagus nerve, rotates backwards around the right subclavian artery and advances towards the tracheoesophageal groove after pass­ing the trachea at an angle of 15–45° posterior to the carotid artery. While on the left neck, at the level of the ligamentum arteriosum, the left RLN branches out from the vagus nerve, turns posteri­orly from the anterior aspect of the aortic arch, and reaches the tracheoesophageal groove from the medial side of the left common carotid artery (Fig.3.9) [5].
important structures associated with the RLN.In majority of the cases, the RLN is located anterior or posterior to ITA, or passes within its branches. After passing the ITA level, the RLN usually fol­lows the same anatomical route on both sides, and next runs close to the Zuckerkandl tubercle (ZT)
Right recurrent laryngeal nerve
The anatomical course of the RLN is different
The inferior thyroid artery (ITA) is one of the
Trachea
Left recurrent laryngeal nerve
Arch of aorta
and the Berry’s ligament. The Berry’s ligament is encountered when the dissection is performed posterior to the thyroid glands. The risk of RLN injury in this area of Berry’s ligament is very high [5]. The surgical procedure in thyroid surgery is illustrated in Figs.3.10, 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13.
During the thyroid surgery, other important neural structures are also at risk. In addition to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), protection must be provided to the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) [7]. This EBSLN supplies the cricothyroid muscle, which tenses vocal cord. This is particularly crucial for a professional voice user like singer, teacher, and tutor. The entry point of the EBSLN into the mus­cle is usually 1.1mm from the insertion of the sternothyroid into the oblique line of the thyroid cartilage and 5–12mm from the muscle’s ante­rior border. There is a classication system by Cernea etal., which highlights the course of the external laryngeal nerve in relation to the upper lobe of the thyroid glands. Ideally, the superior
3 Signicance ofAnatomical Versus Surgical Landmarks inHead andNeck Surgery
Fig. 3.13 Thyroid mass has been removed exposing the
Fig. 3.10 Important landmarks should be marked before
the rst skin incision in order to orientate the critical structures that need to be addressed safely during the sur­gery. Outline of the mass is in dotted lines (big arrow), skin incision (star), anterior border of SCM (small arrow), and hyoid bone (hb)
trachea (T). The sternocleidomastoid muscle is visible on either side of the neck, left SCM (L SCM) and right SCM (R SCM)
67
Fig. 3.11 A midline thyroid mass is visualized on lateral inspection
Fig. 3.12 A subplatysmal skin ap has been raised (black arrow), and the strap muscle overlying the thyroid mass is exposed. Classically, the skin ap can be retracted with a Joules retractor (white arrow) or an assistant with a cold retractor instrument
Fig. 3.14 Intraoperative neural monitoring in thyroid gland surgery is vital for preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. The ground electrode (star) and the elec­tric lead inserted to the intubation tube (arrow) are secured
thyroid artery should be ligated 1.0 cm away from the upper pole of thyroid gland to avoid injury to EBSLN. Before ligating the superior thyroid vessels, these useful landmarks enable the nerve to be consistently located, identied, and preserved during thyroid surgery [8]. Thus, a meticulous dissection needs to identify and pre­serve these nerves.
In addition to visual identication, the intra­operative neural monitoring (IONM) (Fig.3.14) is able to assist surgeons to better identify the nerves, both the RLN and ESBLN.The use of IONM application can functionally locate the EBSLN so that muscle twitch, i.e. the cricothy­roid muscle, is a reliable evidence of the EBSLN’s functional integrity. In the majority of patients, activation of the EBSLN causes a recordable