Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4434_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgment
- •Contents
- •About the Editors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.6 Dissection Procedure
- •1.6.2 Dissection Guide
- •1.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •1.5.3 Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- •2.3.1 Oral Cavity Surgery
- •2.3.2 Pharyngeal Surgery
- •2.3.3 Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS)
- •2.4 Laryngeal Surgery
- •2.6 Salivary Gland Surgery
- •2.7 Thyroid Gland Surgery
- •2.8 Neck Dissection
- •2.9.1 Paediatric Surgery
- •2.10 Anatomical Versus Surgical Landmarks
- •2.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.6.1 Pharynx
- •3.6.2 Nasopharyngeal Surgery
- •3.6.6 Temporal Bone Surgery
- •3.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.2.1 Perineural Tumour Spread
- •4.2.2 Carotid Artery Involvement
- •4.3.1 Oral Cavity
- •4.3.2 Nasopharynx
- •4.3.3 Oropharynx
- •4.3.4 Hypopharynx
- •4.3.5 Larynx
- •4.4.1 Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •4.4.2 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •4.4.3 Nasopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •4.4.4 Non-HPV Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •4.4.5 Unknown Primary Tumours
- •4.5 Lymph Nodes
- •4.5.1 Introduction
- •4.5.2.1 Clustering
- •4.5.2.2 Morphology
- •4.5.2.3 Inhomogeneity
- •4.5.2.4 Size
- •4.5.2.5 Lymphatic Drainage
- •4.6 Advanced Imaging
- •4.6.1 Elastography
- •4.6.2 DWI-MRI
- •4.7.1 Introduction
- •4.11 Cross-Sectional Imaging
- •References
- •5: Approach Towards Oral Cavity Cancers
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3 Diagnostic Evaluation
- •5.8.2.1 Access-Incision Planning
- •5.8.3 Surgical Techniques
- •5.8.3.1 Anaesthesia Considerations
- •5.8.4.1 Peroral Wide Local Excision
- •5.8.5.1 Access Osteotomy Through Mandibulotomy
- •5.8.5.2 Surgical Steps
- •5.8.5.3 Pull-Through Approach
- •5.8.5.4 Oral Component
- •5.8.5.5 Neck Component
- •5.8.6.1 Peroral Wide Local Excision
- •5.8.6.2.1 Surgical Steps
- •5.8.11 Hard Palate (T1–T2 Lesion)
- •5.8.11.1 Upper Alveolectomy
- •References
- •6.1 Benign Oropharyngeal Tumours
- •6.1.1 Lingual Thyroid
- •6.1.2 Epidemiology
- •6.1.3 Clinical Presentation
- •6.1.4 Histology
- •6.1.5 Imaging
- •6.1.6 Blood Investigation
- •6.1.7 Treatment
- •6.1.8 Surgical Treatment
- •6.1.9 Non-surgical Treatment
- •6.2 Pleomorphic Adenoma
- •6.2.1 Diagnosis
- •6.4.8 Early Stage
- •6.4.9 Advanced Stage
- •6.4.10 Non-surgical Treatment
- •6.4.11 Case Illustration 1
- •6.4.12 Case Illustration 2
- •6.5 Benign Hypopharyngeal Tumours
- •6.5.1 Fibrolipoma
- •6.2.3 Treatment
- •6.2.4 Case Illustration 1
- •6.3 Papilloma
- •6.3.1 Epidemiology
- •6.3.2 Clinical Presentation
- •6.3.3 Histology
- •6.3.4 Treatment
- •6.4.1 Risk Factors
- •6.4.2 Clinical Presentation
- •6.4.3 Diagnosis
- •6.4.4 Histology
- •6.4.5 Imaging
- •6.4.6 Staging
- •6.4.7 Treatment
- •6.6.1 Epidemiology
- •6.6.2 Risk Factor
- •6.6.3 Clinical Presentation
- •6.6.4 Diagnosis
- •6.6.5 Blood Investigations
- •6.6.6 Imaging
- •6.6.8 Histology
- •6.6.9 Staging
- •6.6.9.1 Primary Tumour (T)
- •6.6.9.2 Regional Lymph Node (N)
- •6.6.9.3 Distant Metastasis (M)
- •6.6.9.4 Stage Groups
- •6.6.10 Treatment
- •6.6.10.1 Surgical
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Salvage Neck Dissection
- •7.3.2.1 Procedure
- •7.3.2.2 Advantages
- •7.3.2.3 Disadvantages
- •7.3.3.1 Procedure
- •7.3.3.2 Advantages
- •7.3.3.3 Disadvantages
- •7.4.1 Procedure
- •7.4.2 Advantages
- •7.4.3 Disadvantages
- •7.5.1 Procedure
- •7.5.2 Advantages
- •7.5.3 Disadvantages
- •7.6 Subtemporal-Preauricular Infratemporal Fossa Approach
- •7.6.1 Procedure
- •7.6.2 Advantages
- •7.6.3 Disadvantages
- •7.7 Facial Translocation
- •7.7.1 Procedure
- •7.7.2 Advantages
- •7.7.3 Disadvantages
- •7.8 Endoscopic Endonasal Transpterygoid Nasopharyngectomy (EETN)
- •7.8.1 Patient Selection
- •7.8.2 Surgical Technique
- •7.8.2.1 Nasoseptal Flap
- •7.8.2.2 Sinonasal Corridor
- •7.8.2.3 Posterior Septectomy
- •7.8.2.4 Inferior Sphenoidectomy
- •7.8.2.5 Transpterygoid Dissection
- •7.8.2.6 Tumour Extirpation
- •7.10 Miscellaneous
- •7.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.6 Parotid Gland Surgery
- •8.6.1 Benign Parotid Tumour Surgery
- •8.6.2 Malignant Parotid Tumour Surgery
- •8.7.1.2 Skin Incision
- •8.7.1.4 Greater Auricular Nerve Preservation
- •8.7.1.8 Facial Nerve Branch Preservation
- •8.7.1.10 Homeostasis Control
- •8.7.1.12 Post-operative Follow-Up
- •8.7.2.1 Case Illustration 1
- •8.8 Complications Post Parotidectomy
- •8.9.2 Post-operative Assessment
- •8.12 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.1 Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve
- •9.2.3 Berry’s Ligament
- •9.2.4 Parathyroid Gland Anatomy
- •9.2.5 Inferior Thyroid Artery
- •9.2.6 Zuckerkandl Tubercle
- •9.5 Retrosternal Thyroid Tumour
- •9.7 Intraoperative Neural Monitoring
- •9.9 Thyroid Lobectomy
- •9.9.1 Case Illustration 1: Completion Hemithyroidectomy
- •9.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Surgical Anatomy
- •10.3 Indications
- •10.4.1 Patient Preparation
- •10.4.2 Informed Consent
- •10.4.3 Preoperative Planning/Evaluation
- •10.4.4.1 Antibiotic
- •10.4.4.2 Systemic Corticosteroid
- •10.4.4.3 Topical Decongestants
- •10.4.4.4 Adrenaline
- •10.4.5 Anaesthesia
- •10.4.7 Image-Guided System (IGS)
- •10.5 Operative Techniques
- •10.5.1 Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
- •10.5.1.1 Uncinectomy
- •10.5.1.2 Middle Meatal Antrostomy (MMA)
- •10.5.1.3 Ethmoidal Bullectomy
- •10.5.1.4 Posterior Ethmoidectomy
- •10.5.1.5 Sphenoidotomy
- •10.5.1.6 Frontal Sinusotomy
- •10.6 Intraoperative Complication
- •10.6.1 Intranasal Complications
- •10.6.1.2 Arterial Injury
- •10.6.1.2.1 Sphenopalatine Artery
- •10.6.1.2.2 Anterior Ethmoidal Artery (AEA)
- •10.6.1.2.3 Posterior Ethmoidal Artery (PEA)
- •10.6.1.2.4 Internal Carotid Artery (ICA)
- •Call for Help
- •Interventional Radiologist/Endovascular
- •10.6.2 Intraorbital Complications
- •10.6.2.2 Orbital Emphysema (Grade I)
- •10.6.2.3 Intraorbital Haematoma (Grade I)
- •10.6.2.5 Extraocular Muscle Injury (Grade III)
- •10.6.2.6 Optic Nerve Injury (Grade III)
- •10.6.3 Intracranial Complications
- •10.6.3.1 CSF Leak
- •10.6.4 Post-operative Complication
- •10.6.4.1 Epistaxis
- •10.6.4.2 Nasal Synechia
- •10.6.4.3 Other Complications
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Anatomical Landmarks
- •11.3 Background
- •11.4 Patient’s Preparation
- •11.5 Equipment
- •11.6 Positioning
- •11.7 Preoperative Evaluation
- •11.8 Infrastructure Maxillectomy
- •11.9 Subtotal Maxillectomy
- •11.10 Total Maxillectomy
- •11.12 Transoral-Transnasal Endoscopic Maxillectomy
- •11.13 Endoscopic-Assisted Transfacial Maxillectomy
- •11.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.3 Laryngeal Diseases
- •12.4 Supraglottic Carcinoma
- •12.5 Glottic Carcinoma
- •12.6 Subglottic Carcinoma
- •12.8 Surgical Treatment
- •12.9.1 Skin Incision
- •12.9.5 Larynx Skeletonization
- •12.10 Open Partial Horizontal Laryngectomy (OPHL)
- •12.10.1.1 Surgical Technique
- •12.10.2.1 Surgical Technique
- •12.10.3.1 Surgical Technique
- •12.11 Total Laryngectomy
- •12.11.1 Surgical Technique
- •12.12 Future Challenges
- •12.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.5 Central Compartment Neck Dissection
- •13.6 Selective Neck Dissection
- •13.7.1 Selective Neck Dissection
- •13.7.2 Case Illustration 1
- •13.7.3 Case Illustration 2
- •13.7.4 Case Illustration 3
- •13.9 Radical Neck Dissection
- •13.11 Prognosis
- •13.12 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.3 Endoscopic Assisted Surgical Access
- •14.3.1 Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
- •14.7 Clavicle Osteotomy
- •14.7.1 Case Illustration
- •14.7.1.1 Case 1
- •14.8 Base-of-Neck Tumour
- •14.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Orbital Exenteration
- •15.2.1 Surgical Steps
- •15.2.1.1 Lid-Sparing Exenteration
- •15.2.1.2 Total Exenteration
- •15.2.2 Case Illustrations
- •15.2.3 Complications
- •15.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.1 Benign Pathology
- •16.4 Vestibular Disorders
- •16.4.1 Ménière’s Disease
- •16.4.2 Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
- •16.5.3 Temporal Bone Paraganglioma
- •16.6 Malignant Neoplasms
- •16.7.1 Diagnostic Audiology
- •16.7.2 Vestibular Tests
- •16.7.3 Imaging
- •16.8.2 Postauricular Incision
- •16.8.3 Transmeatal Incisions
- •16.8.4 Endaural Incisions
- •16.9 Anterior Atticotomy
- •16.10 Transmastoid Approaches
- •16.10.3 Posterior Tympanotomy
- •16.11 Endolymphatic Sac Decompression
- •16.12 Subtotal Petrosectomy
- •16.13 Translabyrinthine Approaches
- •16.14 Transcochlear Approach
- •16.16 Middle Cranial Fossa
- •16.19 Endoscopic Ear Surgery
- •16.19.1 Protympanum
- •16.19.2 Epitympanum
- •16.19.3 Retrotympanum
- •16.19.4 Hypotympanum
- •16.21 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2.1 Vascular Lesions
- •17.2.2 Infantile Haemangioma
- •17.2.2.1 Introduction
- •17.2.2.2 Epidemiology
- •17.2.2.3 Pathogenesis
- •17.2.2.4 Phases
- •17.2.2.4.1 Proliferative Phase
- •17.2.2.4.2 Involution Phase
- •17.2.2.5 Diagnosis
- •17.2.2.6 Treatment
- •17.2.2.7 Medical Therapy
- •17.2.2.8 Laser Therapy
- •17.2.2.9 Surgical Therapy
- •17.2.3 Dermoid Cyst
- •17.2.3.1 Introduction
- •17.2.3.3 Clinical Presentation
- •17.2.3.4 Imaging
- •17.2.3.5 Treatment
- •17.2.3.5.1 Surgery
- •17.3 Thyroglossal Duct Cyst
- •17.3.1 Introduction
- •17.3.2 Embryology
- •17.3.3 Clinical Presentation
- •17.3.4 Diagnosis
- •17.3.4.1 Blood Investigation
- •17.3.4.3 Histology
- •17.3.4.4 Imaging
- •17.3.5 Treatment
- •17.3.5.1 Surgery
- •17.3.5.2 Sclerotherapy
- •17.4 Rhabdomyosarcoma
- •17.4.1 Introduction
- •17.4.3 General Characteristics
- •17.4.4 Histology
- •17.4.5 Diagnosis
- •17.4.5.1 Biopsy
- •17.4.6 Staging
- •17.4.7 Treatment
- •17.4.7.1 Chemotherapy
- •17.4.7.2 Radiation Therapy
- •17.4.7.3 Surgical Therapy
- •17.4.8 Prognosis
- •17.4.9 Recurrence
- •17.5.1 Introduction
- •17.5.2 Epidemiology
- •17.5.3 Aetiology
- •17.5.4 Pathogenesis
- •17.5.5 Presentation
- •17.5.6 Diagnosis
- •17.5.7 Imaging
- •17.5.8 Histology
- •17.5.9 Staging
- •17.5.9.1 Fisch Staging
- •17.5.9.2 Radkowski Staging
- •17.5.10 Treatment
- •17.5.10.1 Surgery
- •17.5.10.2 Outcome
- •17.5.10.3 Complications
- •17.5.10.4 Radiotherapy
- •17.5.10.5 Chemotherapy
- •17.5.10.6 Hormonal Therapy
- •17.5.10.7 Spontaneous Regression
- •17.6 Lymphatic Malformation
- •17.6.1 Introduction
- •17.6.2 Genetics
- •17.6.3 Clinical Presentation
- •17.6.4 Diagnosis
- •17.6.5 Treatment
- •17.6.5.1 Observation
- •17.6.5.2 Sclerotherapy
- •17.6.5.3 Surgery
- •17.6.5.4 Other Modalities
- •17.6.5.4.1 Novel Agents
- •17.7 Cystic Hygroma
- •17.8 Lymphoma
- •17.8.1 Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
- •17.8.2 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
- •17.8.4 Diagnosis
- •17.8.4.1 Haematology
- •17.8.4.2 Imaging
- •17.8.4.3 Surgery
- •17.8.7.1 Radiation Therapy
- •17.9 Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
- •17.9.1 Epidemiology
- •17.9.2 Pathogenesis
- •17.9.3 Clinical Feature
- •17.9.4 Investigations
- •17.9.5 Treatment
- •17.9.5.1 Solitary or Single-System Involvement
- •17.9.5.2 Multisystem Involvement
- •17.9.5.3 Induction Chemotherapy
- •17.9.5.4 Continuation Chemotherapy
- •17.9.5.5 Post-treatment Follow-Up
- •17.9.5.6 Relapsed or Refractory Disease
- •References
- •18.1.1 Case Illustration 1
- •18.1.2 Surgical Steps
- •18.2 Case Illustration 2
- •18.3 Stomatoplasty
- •18.5.1 Case Illustration
- •18.6.1 Case Illustration
- •18.7 Deep Lobe Parotidectomy
- •18.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2.1 Cross-Sectional Imaging
- •19.2.2 Emerging Applications
- •19.2.6 PET-MR
- •19.2.8 Others
- •19.2.8.1 SPECT
- •19.2.8.2 Elastography
- •19.2.8.3 Fluoroscopy
- •19.2.8.4 Narrowband Imaging
- •19.2.9 Biochemical Investigations
- •19.2.10 Imaging Biomarkers
- •19.3.1 Neck Dissection
- •19.5 Oral Cavity Cancer (OCSCC)
- •19.7 Hypopharyngeal Cancer
- •19.8 Nasopharynx Carcinoma (NPC)
- •19.10 Salivary Gland Malignancy
- •19.10.1 Parotid Tumors
- •19.11 Intraoperative Facial Nerve Monitoring
- •19.12.1 Treatment
- •19.13 Parapharyngeal Space Tumors (PPS)
- •19.14.2 Diagnostic Controversy
- •19.14.5 Optimal Resection Margins
- •19.15.1 Nonsurgical Treatment
- •19.16.2 Induction Chemotherapy
- •19.19.1 Targeted Therapy
- •19.19.2 Immunotherapy
- •19.19.3 Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs)
- •19.20 Conclusion
- •References

458
B. H. Siddiquee
19.2.3 Imaging ofHypoxia
Tissue hypoxia may decrease sensitivity to
chemoradiation. Hypoxic cells are resilient to the
toxic properties of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and require higher radiation dose than for the
non-hypoxic counterpart to achieve the same
therapeutic effect. Thus, concerned clinicians
have increasing awareness to diagnose hypoxic
HNSCC beforehand with the hope to modify
therapeutic approaches to avoid this limitation of
chemoradiation [39].
19.2.4 Evaluation ofTumor Cell
Proliferation
Cellular multiplication during treatment is
unfavorable for desired post-radiotherapy result
in HNSCC. A new PET element is advanced
(3′-deoxy-3′-18F-FLT-PET) whose signal
intensity is more specic for aggressively multiplying tumor cells in comparison to 18F-FDGPET [40].
19.2.7 Future ofMolecular Imaging
inHNSCC
Molecular imaging is rening the tumor detection, assessment, plus treatment planning. This
highly sophisticated technique also helps to
develop:
1. Screening tools—more accurate but noninva-
sive method to evaluate people at risk.
2. Efcacy of newer drugs by quick understand-
ing of the treatment response.
3. Personalized medicine, where medical treat-
ment depends on patient-specic exclusive
genetic prole.
4. In the coming years, molecular imaging is
likely to be frequently used in:
(a) Hybrid imaging—more than one imaging
technique will be combined to yield single image.
(b) Optical imaging [42].
19.2.8 Others
19.2.5 Prevention
ofNeoangiogenesis
18F-Galacto-RGD-PET images a receptor associated with tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.
This is utilized for the evaluation of tumor
response to targeted therapies. The intensity of
18F-RGD peptide accumulation relates to the
existence of stimulated endothelial cells and
microvessel attenuation [39].
19.2.6 PET-MR
PET-MR fusion image in HNSCC is promising
for further accuracy in staging. Study shows that
the precision for tumor node metastasis staging is
almost similar in PET/CT and MRI (74.6% and
73%, respectively). MRI along with PET
improves the correctness up to 92% [41].
PET-MR fusion scan is likely to be used widely
for assessing HNSCC in the near future.
19.2.8.1 SPECT
Primary HNSCC and cervical lymph nodal
metastasis can be imaged with 201 Tl
SPECT. This could furnish evidence beyond
structural changes and may be a complementary
technique for the evaluation of HNSCC [43].
19.2.8.2 Elastography
A recent development in ultrasound technique
may be used to evaluate primary lesion and also
to get information about lymph node metastases
in HNSCC patients.
19.2.8.3 Fluoroscopy
There are situations where simultaneous use of contrast swallowing and uoroscopy is required.
Possibility of aspiration or entry of dye through stula in airway is dynamically observed by video uoroscopy. Consistency of a surgical anastomosis or a
pharyngo-cutaneous stula tract could be assessed
too [44]. These assessments are usually done
together with speech therapists to facilitate management planning for better functional outcomes.

19 Updates andControversies intheManagement ofHead andNeck Malignancy
459
19.2.8.4 Narrowband Imaging
The endoscopy with narrowband imaging (NBI)
facility can create sharp image contrast in recognizing small mucosal lesions. Intraepithelial
microvasculature becomes highlighted which
helps to understand the lesion’s pathology. This
unique technique has real efciency in the early
identication of hypopharyngeal, oropharyngeal,
oral cavity, laryngeal, and nasopharyngeal cancers and metastatic lymph nodes with unknown
primary. NBI endoscopy is a useful instrument in
detecting cancers at initial stage and offers chance
for minimally invasive surgery [45, 46].
19.2.9 Biochemical Investigations
Quantitative changes have been shown to occur in
a variety of substances in serum during the development of HNSCC.These substances are collectively called tumor biomarkers. The potential role
of tumor biomarkers includes early detection,
monitoring tumor volume whether decreasing or
increasing, detecting recurrence and/or metastasis,
and anticipating prognosis. Changes from the initial serum level of biomarkers reect the existence/
nonexistence of tumor and also favorable/unfavorable prognosis following therapy. The tumor biomarkers can be categorized as oncofetal proteins,
hormones, enzymes, proteins, etc. Although many
of these are considered as nonspecic, some have
been shown to be of value in the detection and
management of various HNSCCs.
Though overall prognosis improved a little
with modern therapies, further improvement of
disease-free survival can be achieved by early
detection and relapse prevention. Research about
molecular changes and categorization during
HNSCC development and identifying biomarkers related to different HNSCC are likely to play
a crucial role in the overall management of these
diseases in the coming decades [47].
Many biomarkers possess inspiring potential
but require further clinical validation. The following markers have raised the interest of
researchers: chemokine receptors, human papillomavirus, microsatellite instability, microRNA,
p53, etc.
19.2.10 Imaging Biomarkers
In addition to biochemical biomarkers, imaging
biomarkers also have a signicant role in detecting HNSCC at initial stage. These are noninvasive newer tools for monitoring therapeutic
response and follow-up of HNSCC patients.
PET/CT is superior to MRI or CT individually in
respect to sensitivity and specicity. Newly
hosted regional PET/Gd (gadolinium-enhanced
T1-weighted)-MRI jointly with whole-body
PET-MRI seems to be fairly capable in noticing
early lesions [47].
19.3 Surgical Management
ofHNSCC
Surgical treatment of HNSCC has got a momentum as a result of tremendous advancements in
anesthesia, safe blood transfusion technique,
invention of efcient antibiotics, and newer reconstructive ideas and skill. The philosophy of radical
resection is replaced by organ preservation expertise to restore function without compromising the
ultimate goal of disease-free survival. Changing
policy in the surgical management of neck metastasis, depending upon the site and type of HNSCC,
reects in the treatment planning.
19.3.1 Neck Dissection
Efcient surgical maneuver to address the neck
metastasis in HNSCC is a crucial factor in the
overall management of HNSCC. Metastasis in
the neck is the topmost individual prognostic factor and reduces survival by 50%, but the extracapsular spread and presence of contralateral
node metastasis reduce the prognosis by another
50%. Neck dissection not only clears the
metastatic neck disease but also helps in realistic
staging of the disease. The basic concept of neck
dissection is to remove all the lymphatic and nonlymphatic structures in between the investing
layer and deeper layer of the deep fascia of the
neck. These may include IJV, SCM, and SAN but
never ever carotid arteries and vagus nerve. Other

460
B. H. Siddiquee
structures to be preserved are actually beneath
the deeper layer, e.g., brachial plexus and phrenic
nerve. Prime targets of neck dissection are:
1. To control the manifested neck metastasis in
head and neck malignancy
2. To reduce locoregional spread of head-neck
malignancy and improve survival in clinically
and radiologically negative neck
3. As salvage surgical procedure in recurrent
malignant disease of the neck (post-surgery/
post-RT)
In 1880, Emil Theodor Kocher, a Swiss
researcher and physician (1909 Nobel laureate),
proposed the removal of cervical nodal metastasis for HNSCC. In 1888, a Polish surgeon
Jawdynski described en bloc resection of the
neck along with carotid, IJV, and SCM.This article was published in polish language. In 1906,
George W.Crile (Ohio, USA) dened the radical
neck dissection (RND). His surgical procedure
included excision of all the lymph nodes along
with SAN, IJV, and SCM on one side of the neck.
In 1950s, Hays Martin who is known as the father
of modern head and neck surgery started using
RND routinely to control neck metastasis.
In 1960s, Oscar Suarez, E.Bocca, and Pignataro
pronounced functional neck dissection (FND)
with the idea of few structural conservation but
nearly equal efcacy where SAN, IJV, and SCM
are preserved according to the situational demand.
Oncologic success of the FND was denitively
reported by Bocca in the mid- 1970s. This operation included meticulous dissection of cervical
lymph nodes in different compartments of the
neck and conservation of IJV, SAN, and SCM,
considering functional and cosmetic aspects [48,
49]. Minimum adverse post-surgery consequences
during the management of clinically negative neck
and opportunity to do bilateral neck dissections in
the same session avoiding the hazard of cerebral
and facial edema likely to develop after removing
both sided IJVs are the main advantages [50].
FND is also known as modied radical neck dissection (MRND).
From the conceptual point of view, RND comprises all lymph node levels (I–V) together with
the IJV, SAN, and SCM. MRND embraces the
similar lymph node levels like RND but saves
IJV, SAN, and SCM (any one/two or all the
three). The selective neck dissection (SND)
addresses some of the lymph node groups
included in MRND leaving others. Therapeutic
neck dissection is done in preoperative or preoperatively positive (high clinical suspicion or frozen section proven) neck. Elective neck dissection
(END) is done on the basis of recognized threat
for occult metastases.
Lindberg and colleagues published an article
in 1972 based on the review of the records of
HNSCC patients illustrating that cervical lymph
node metastases from any subsite of the head
neck region follow a predictable pattern [51]. In
1990, Shah and his team at MSKCC, NewYork,
showed the histological patterns of nodal metastases in HNSCC patients subjected to elective
and therapeutic neck dissections [52, 53]. These
two works acted as rotating points. Depending on
this idea about the order of metastasis, elective
dissection of selected levels of lymph nodes
(elective SND) has developed as a replacement
for elective MRND.
In oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
(OCSCC), level IIb lymph node metastasis is
rarely found and nodal recurrence after supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND) is infrequent [54]. Therefore, this region may be
preserved in elective SOHND in patients of oral
cavity carcinoma.
Super-selective neck dissections conserving
level IIb are safe oncosurgical procedures if done
prophylactically in carefully chosen patients, e.g.,
elective treatment of the cN0 neck and salvage
treatment of persistent lymph node disease after
chemoradiation. It has been observed that shoulder morbidity is higher in the rst few weeks in
patients undergoing IIb-sparing neck dissections,
but in the course of time recovery is satisfactory
[55]. The following classication covers all types
of neck dissection currently in practice:
1. Comprehensive neck dissections:
(a) Radical neck dissection
(b) Modied radical neck dissection with 03
classical types

19 Updates andControversies intheManagement ofHead andNeck Malignancy
461
(c) Extended radical neck dissection
2. Selective neck dissections:
(a) Classical selective neck dissection:
All four classical types
(b) Extended selective neck dissection,
SND plus any nonlymphatic structure
is excised like IJV, SCM, or SAN
(c) Super-selective neck dissection:
SND-sparing L-IIb (in laryngeal
carcinoma)
SOHND-sparing L-Ia (in small posterior lesions of the oral cavity)
The idea of sentinel lymph node biopsy
(SLNB) is put forward as a new precise method
for histopathological staging of the negative neck
parallel to elective SND [56]. Facial lymph nodes’
frozen-section biopsy during surgery for parotid
malignancy is also described to determine the
necessity of neck dissection [56]. SLNB using
radiotracer to isolate the rst echelon nodes is in
practice for management of breast cancer and
melanoma. There is argument whether SLNB is
good for staging HNSCC with N0 neck [57].
Endoscopic neck dissection has been described in
porcine and humans with papillary thyroid cancer
[58, 59]. These super-selective nominally invasive
methods may take over an important part in the
forthcoming staging system of HNSCC [60].
Total laryngectomy with neck dissection has
become the prime choice (Figs.19.2 and 19.3).
But the operation’s consequences are loss of
voice along with loss of nasal function, swallowing complications, altered lung function, tracheostomy hazards, and also psychological impacts
during the remaining part of life.
Subsequently, two methods for surgical restoration of voice had been designed: (1) neoglottic reconstruction and (2) shunts. Various
systems have been tried for neoglottic reconstruction to develop a tracheohyoidopexy pro-
Fig. 19.2 Laryngeal carcinoma (FOL picture)
19.4 Surgery forLaryngeal
Carcinoma
Undesirable death rate of surgery for laryngeal
carcinoma rendered it as a disappointing situation in the early part of the last century. Most of
the patients used to refuse major surgical procedure because of limited hope for survival and little chance of cure. So, both the clinicians and
patients got inclined towards radiotherapy as the
rst choice. But quickly the limitations of primitive radiotherapy were understood. Rapid development of surgical skill, availability of antibiotics
and safer anesthetic agents plus efcient perioperative care directed the consensus again towards
radical surgery as the preferred choice for laryngeal cancer usually diagnosed in advance stage.
Fig. 19.3 CT scan showing cartilage invasion

462
B. H. Siddiquee
cedure, but almost all are abandoned because
of multiple complications. Guttman fashioned
a surgical tracheoesophageal stula in 1932
[61]. A great conceptual upgrading surfaced
in 1970s through Eric Blom and Mark Singer.
Tracheoesophageal puncture and use of prosthesis have dramatically changed the rehabilitation of the patients following laryngectomy.
Subsequently in Europe, indwelling voice
prosthesis was developed [62, 63]. The Provox
voice prosthesis, developed in the Netherlands
(1988), is currently one of the widely used
devices [64, 65]. The Provox Vega is the latest
version which can be used for both primary and
secondary procedures. Other available solutions for voice rehabilitation are esophageal
speech and electro-larynx.
Pressman etal. noticed the compartmentalized structure of the larynx and its implication
for feasibility of subtotal laryngectomies [66].
Subsequently, approaches for various partial
laryngectomies came into practice. Supraglottic
laryngectomy was reported in 1940s and supracricoid laryngectomy in the late 1950s [67,
68]. The objective of these procedures was to
ensure oncologic disease clearance along with
restoration of the functions (speech and swallowing) and to avoid permanent tracheostome.
Transoral laryngeal surgery (TOLS) by carbon
dioxide laser started in the 1970s with reported
cure rates as good as open surgery and radiotherapy [69, 70]. Transoral endoscopic laser
resection became popular for smaller lesions
(T1 and T2) and also for some selected larger
tumors. Now the robot-assisted supraglottic
laryngectomy has been validated (TORS),
which is rationalizing the transoral resection of
laryngeal cancer [71].
The robotic system makes a provision for a
very clear and accurate operation eld, ensuring
wonderful hemostasis, superb visualization with
identication of submucosal soft tissue and skeletal landmarks of the larynx, and threedimensional resection of cancer [72]. The robotic
system also provides tremendous visualization as
well as controlled microdissection at the vocal
cord level [73].
19.5 Oral Cavity Cancer (OCSCC)
OCSCC is still a major component of HNSCC
causing suffering as well as death among patients,
especially in Southeast and East Asia. Although
the incidence has been declining over the last few
decades, outcomes remain as before with little
improvement in the overall survival. Although
surgical resection is considered as the primary
therapeutic modality, many sectors of dispute and
disagreement are persisting about investigations,
overall surgical management, and also concerning adjuvant therapy.
Subsites of oral cavity proper are buccal
mucosa, hard palate, lower alveolus, upper alveolus, oor of mouth, and oral tongue. Retromolar
trigone SCCs are classied as buccal mucosa
tumors although they have special features of
early posterior spread and mandible involvement
(Figs.19.4 and 19.5).
Subsite of the oral cavity involved and stage of
the tumor are key issues inuencing the selection
of therapeutic modality for OCSCC.The performance status of individuals is also a major consideration because primary therapeutic approach
is often drastic with many untoward effects. Oral
cavity cancer cases are conventionally treated by
surgery, chemoradiation, or combinations of
these modalities. The NCCN guideline generally
Fig. 19.4 Tongue carcinoma

19 Updates andControversies intheManagement ofHead andNeck Malignancy
463
Fig. 19.5 Buccal carcinoma of the retromolar area
endorses surgery for early lesions and surgery or
concurrent chemoradiotherapy for those with
advanced lesions [74]. But the decision is absolutely individualized and multifactorial. The
combined treatment can be offered concurrently
or sequentially. Surgery is typically the starting
modality in sequential therapy. Denitive highdose radiation may induce osteoradionecrosis
[75, 76]. The target of operation is resection of
the entire primary tumor maintaining safe margins around and comprehensive/selective removal
of cervical lymph nodes and also perfect staging
of the disease.
Operating approaches for oral cavity resection
are decided by the site, surface extension, and
deep invasion. To achieve three-dimensional
margin clearance is the crucial issue in choosing
surgical approach. There are a wide range of
approaches in practice, e.g., transoral for smaller
lesion up to transmandibular approaches (mandibulotomy/segmental mandibulectomy) along
with free ap reconstruction. The standard treatment for this type of cancer is radical excision
and preservation of function and aesthetics as
much as possible. Surgery can be performed with
electrocautery or laser to minimize bleeding and
to get a clear operating area (Figs.19.6 and 19.7).
Different prognostic factors are identied like
primary subsite, levels of lymph nodes involved,
tumor thickness, and surgical margins. Status of
the excision margin is one of the critical vari-
Fig. 19.6 Buccal carcinoma with adjacent leukoplakia
Fig. 19.7 Skin carcinoma involving buccal mucosa
ables related to survival [77, 78]. Macroscopic
tridimensional margins from 15 mm onwards
should be obtained for a microscopic margin
>5 mm taking into account that up to 70%
shrinkage may occur in pathology specimen
[79]. Somewhat poor survival is seen in cases
where instant repeat resection is done to ensure
negative margins after excising through positive
margins in comparison to resection done conrming negative margin on the rst attempt
(31% vs. 49%, respectively) [80].
Narrowband imaging p53 chromosomal analysis mutation status of the excision margins has
revealed potentiality to identify tumors with his-

464
B. H. Siddiquee
tologically negative margins but biologically
positive margins [81, 82]. NBI shows great
potential to improve detection rates of oral premalignant conditions, identify oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and dene
surgical margins and thus reduce the risk of
recurrence for OCSCC and OPSCC. However,
lot of controversies still exist about the utility of
molecular analysis of the resection margin, and
this is yet to be used routinely in medical practice. Time and nancial involvement are other
factors limiting its use.
Evolution of oncosurgery has exerted decisive
inuence to perform less invasive surgical procedures. CO2 laser demonstrates that this is an
acceptable surgical method for the management
of small lesions of the oral cavity [83]. Transoral
robotic surgery (TORS), a minimal invasive surgery, has been practiced in many centers to treat
early OCSCC with minimum or no blood loss
and favorable outcome.
19.6 Oropharyngeal Cancer
(OPSCC)
With the advent of laser and robotic instruments,
the surgery for OPSCC has undergone noteworthy renement. Until the end of the twentieth
century, open surgery was the primary choice.
Because of severe morbidities associated with
these approaches leading to functional incapacity
of the patients, these were largely abandoned.
Formerly, most OPSCC cases were related to
consumption of tobacco and alcohol and affected
older people. Nowadays, most patients diagnosed
with a tonsillar or base-of-tongue disease are
usually HPV-positive cases. These patients are
somewhat younger, and their long-term prognosis is relatively favorable [84, 85]. These facts
have altered the clinical scenario and imposed a
plea to design minimally invasive techniques to
reduce functional morbidity and also treatmentrelated toxicity induced by nonsurgical therapy,
i.e., chemoradiation.
The relentless advances in minimally invasive
surgical procedures, particularly the transoral
laser microsurgery (TOLS) and transoral robotic
surgery (TORS), have redesigned the surgical
landscape. These procedures assure excellent
functional outcome, and surgery appears to be reestablishing its position as the primary therapeutic option for these cancers (Fig.19.8).
Taking into account the complex structural
arrangement and functional signicance of the
oropharynx, several open-access surgical options
are available. Mandibulotomy, mandibulectomy,
and/or pharyngotomy along with reconstructions
by different aps are suitable to treat advancedstage cancers and for salvage operation after
radiotherapy/chemoradiation failure. But because
of the signicant morbidity induced by surgery
including prolonged hospital stay, nasogastric/
gastrostomy feeding tube, necessity for tracheostomy, and also cosmetic deformity, there is a
mounting preference for transoral minimally
invasive procedures.
The benets of transoral techniques are slightest damage to the normal tissues, better safeguard
for the vital neurovascular structures, as well as
quick recovery [86]. Initially although used for
smaller lesions limited within the oropharynx,
presently less invasive procedures are proved as
feasible, useful, and fruitful techniques in
selected cases of advanced OPSCC [87, 88].
Both TOLS and TORS techniques have exhibited
appreciable local control of cancer and disease-
Fig. 19.8 Left tonsillar carcinoma

19 Updates andControversies intheManagement ofHead andNeck Malignancy
465
free survival for primary OPSCC while minimizing functional and aesthetic shortcomings [89,
90]. TOLS and TORS are also efcient for sal-
vage surgical procedure in cases following RT/
CRT failures [91, 92].
TORS provides clearer and wider visualization of the operating ground and better 3D idea of
tissue plane than TOLS, allowing safer access to
the cancer. Another benet of TORS is miniaturized multiarticulate equipment, which mimics
ordinary surgical instruments but offers wider
range arm rotation, with tremor ltration. It also
allows to reach “blind corners” of the pharynx
and larynx by using a 30° telescope [72].
Complications of TORS are also not ignorable.
Hemorrhage represents 23% of complication
related to TORS.Even revision surgical procedure may be required for hemostasis [93]. Cost is
also a major constraint. While comparing the cost
with that of conventional surgery, it appears
excessive. But actually, it should be compared
with nonsurgical options like radiation or chemoradiation or with transcervical/transmandibular
operations. Reducing hospital stay itself could be
enough to balance the cost. Superiority due to
less invasive method, faster recovery, and functional consequences rationalize the expenditure.
TORS, as surgical maneuver, allows assessment of the primary lesion for pathological staging. Concomitant neck dissections permit the
perfect staging based on the histopathological
examination. TORS may be the decisive treatment in selected T1–T2 cases of OPSCC and
erases the necessity of adjuvant treatments [94].
19.7 Hypopharyngeal Cancer
In smaller hypopharyngeal carcinomas, surgical
resection keeping adequate safe margin and
external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) were the
options depending on the expertise and experience of the treating physicians. For advanced
hypopharyngeal carcinomas, radical resection
plus reconstruction of the surgical defect followed by postoperative adjuvant irradiation was
the standard form of management in the
1970s–1990s [95, 96].
In the present era, standard protocol is multimodal treatment, using surgery, radiotherapy, and
chemotherapy with curative intent. Most studies
dealing with hypopharyngeal cancer compare various chemo- and radiotherapy regimens, but do not
compare with a surgical protocol [97]. For patients
categorized as unt for curative treatment, palliation is a choice. Because of signicant submucosal
spread, hypopharyngeal carcinoma is generally
diagnosed in advanced stage (III and IV), commonly with cervical and/or distant metastases, and
therefore bears worse prognosis [98].
Surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal cancers
is determined by the lesion’s subsite involvement
and extension and often requires reconstruction.
Postsurgical reconstructive policies for hypopharynx are usually exible and vary according
to whether the larynx is to be preserved or not. If
the whole larynx is excised, separate channels for
respiration and swallowing are to be created for
maintaining the chief purposes of this organ. In
2003, Disa et al. suggested various types of
repairs depending on the surgical defect in the
pharyngo-esophageal portion after total laryngectomy [99]. The defect including the lateral
wall of the pyriform fossa can be repaired
straightway if it is small. In other cases, reconstruction is required. These procedures may
involve a pedicled myocutaneous ap or free ap
like radial forearm (RFFF) anterolateral thigh
ap (ALT) [100, 101]. If the patient has been
exposed to radiation/chemoradiation prior to surgery, the risk of pharyngo-cutaneous stula or a
stricture formation is much higher.
Recent upsurge in robotics technology is providing scope for more delicate surgical procedures
to be performed utilizing minimal invasive route.
It has many advantages over conventional surgical
approaches, including rapid recovery, lower incidence of postoperative infection, decreased intensity of pain, better postoperative functional
restoration, and cosmetic superiority [102]. Moore
etal. stated that almost all patients regain normal
swallowing at different stages of follow-up within
2 years [103]. Boudreaux et al. found effective
swallowing in 79% at the end of 3months, while
Weinstein etal. reported a successful swallowing
in 97.6% at 12-month follow- up [88, 104].

466
B. H. Siddiquee
19.8 Nasopharynx Carcinoma (NPC)
The incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is
highest in Southern China. Southeast Asia and
North Africa have a lot of cases, but it is rare in
other parts of the globe. There has been a signicant conceptual change regarding etiology and
pathogenesis of NPC in the recent past.
Hypothesis has been put forward that NPC is initiated by an interplay between essential basic factors (persistent Epstein-Barr virus) and cofactors
(bacterial fatty acid and catalytic ingredients of
plant origin habitually consumed). Epstein-Barr
virus (EBV) is triggered by this approach, which
initiates a series of events leading to the malignant transformation [105].
To develop clear knowledge about the biological behavior of NPC, some molecular variables have been evaluated to testify the
hypothesis that p53 dysfunction in NPC is
linked with EBV.The existence of EBV seems
to be the predictor for higher survival, but the
mechanism is yet to be claried [106]. In contrast to other HNSCCs, NPC was previously
considered as “unresectable” due to difcult and
narrow surgical access, high incidence of early
extension beyond the nasopharyngeal cavity,
and also cervical metastasis at presentation.
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was the
prime option for treating such cases. The USA’s
NCCN guidelines endorse intensity-modulated
radiotherapy (IMRT) as the primary curative
treatment for freshly detected NPC, but radiotherapy-induced hazards are hardly acceptable
[107, 108].
Various surgical approaches to nasopharynx
have been designed since the starting of skull
base surgery. Multiple approaches are in practice
for tumours of different size and subsite involved
within the nasopharyngeal space, like
Infratemporal fossa, Transpalatal, Mandibular
swing, Maxillary swing approaches and also
Facial translocation combined with neurosurgical
craniotomy approach for tumours with skull base
extension [109].
With the availability of CT scan and other
imaging, an increasing number of patients are
screened and diagnosed in early stage [110, 111].
This creates an opportunity to radically resect out
the lesions limited in the nasopharyngeal cavity
surgically. Moreover, emergence of nasoendoscopic systems in the modern era, the endoscopic
endonasal approach (EEA), provides scope for
surgeons to excise deeply situated cancers, even
those once labeled as inoperable [112]. Still there
are some limitations and obstacles remaining
during performing the radical excision of NPC
due to troubles faced during instrumentation via a
narrow nasal cavity. Another shortcoming is to
perform en bloc resection. To overcome these
problems and for recurrent NPC, a technical system has been established and employed successfully for using endoscopic nasopharyngectomy
(ENPG) plus reconstruction by pedicle mucoperiosteal ap from nasal septum and oor [113,
114]. ENPG could overcome the previous limita-
tions and achieve satisfactory overall survival,
minimizing posttreatment complications
inlocally recurrent NPC [115].
19.9 Nose andParanasal Sinuses
Paranasal sinus cancers are a group of heterogeneous malignancies, which originate in proximity
to vital structures. Close relation with orbit, cranial nerves, carotid arteries, and intracranial structures including brain makes surgical resection
highly critical with risk of serious morbidity.
Relatively low incidence and heterogeneity render randomized controlled trials regarding management of these cancers difcult. Till the
transition between the twentieth and the twentyrst centuries, the operative procedures for paranasal sinus cancers were mainly different types of
maxillectomy, nasal cavity exenteration, exenteration of ethmoid cells, and exploration and curettage of sphenoid sinuses with an average 5-year
survival rate of 28% [116]. In 1963, Ketcham
etal. reported the craniofacial resection (CFR) for
paranasal sinus cancers [117]. In the 1980s and
1990s, the craniofacial approach became the gold
standard for sinus malignancies. Overall 5-year
survival rate reported was around 51% except for
olfactory neuroblastoma [118] (Fig.19.9).

19 Updates andControversies intheManagement ofHead andNeck Malignancy
467
Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to
sino-nasal malignancies were the rst that came
into practice at that time. Increase in skill over
endoscopic handling; availability of sophisticated investigative tools, e.g., intraoperative
imaging systems; understanding of detailed complex anatomy of the paranasal sinuses and their
relations with the adjacent vital structures; and
expertise in endoscopic resection are growing
rapidly [119] (Fig.19.10).
At the beginning, early-stage malignancies
were handled endoscopically and combined with
craniotomy for more advanced cancers.
Indications for EEA expanded as experience with
endoscopic cancer surgery and cerebrospinal
Fig. 19.9 Orbital bulging in sino-nasal carcinoma
uid (CSF) leak repair increased. The limit has
now extended up to resecting cancers invading
intracranial structures. The idea of the EEA
derives from the observation that these sinus cancers are frequently polypoidal and have a localized attachment and the main tumor bulk lls up
the hollow sinus or nasal cavity at its starting.
The endoscopic surgery removes tumor by piecemeal with the target to reach, identify, and excise
the tumor pedicle and ensure a safe margin facilitated by minimizing bleeding, better illumination, and improved visualization of the tumor
origin [120]. The application of da Vinci robotic
system in the paranasal sinuses has been less successful. Morbidities associated with these
approaches are not negligible [121].
19.10 Salivary Gland Malignancy
19.10.1 Parotid Tumors
Salivary gland malignancies are infrequent, and
the understanding of this disease is mostly based
on reported clinical series rather than randomized
evidence. Salivary gland tumors manifest a
diverse range of histological and clinical behaviors. Parotid tumors are usually found in the
supercial lobe. This lobe is well imagined by
high-frequency ultrasonogram (US) [122]. In
addition, ultrasonography is helpful for guided
ne needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). FNAC
under US guidance has a high rank in investigative accuracy and safety [123]. The trunk of the
a
Fig. 19.10 (a–c) CT scans of sino-nasal carcinoma: (a) ocular extension, (b) palatal extension, and (c) intracranial
extension
b
c
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
