Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5773_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Table of Contents
- •Physics of Flow
- •Flow Pattern and Flow Velocity
- •Ultrasound Principles
- •Doppler Effect
- •Doppler Shift and Flow Velocity
- •List of Abbreviations
- •Introduction
- •Part A Principles and Rules
- •1 Flow and Ultrasound Basics
- •Flow Dynamics
- •Ultrasound Systems
- •Ultrasound Transducer
- •Imaging Modalities, Parameters, and Settings
- •2 Vascular Anatomy and Structure of Ultrasound Examination
- •General Arterial Anatomy
- •Extracranial Arterial Anatomy
- •Intracranial Arterial Anatomy
- •General Structure of Arterial Ultrasound Examination
- •Special Arterial Anatomy and Ultrasound Anatomy
- •Extracranial Arteries
- •Intracranial Arteries
- •General Venous Anatomy
- •Intracranial Venous Anatomy
- •Extracranial Venous Anatomy
- •General Structure of Venous Ultrasound Examination
- •Special Venous Anatomy and Ultrasound Anatomy
- •Intracranial Veins and Sinuses
- •Extracranial Veins
- •3 Intracranial Hemodynamics and Functional Tests
- •Autoregulation
- •Testing of Autoregulation
- •Neurovascular Coupling
- •Testing of Neurovascular Coupling
- •Metabolic Coupling
- •Other Tests to Assess Differences Between the Right and Left Sides as Markers of Impaired Collateral Function
- •Parameters of Cerebral Hemodynamics
- •Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity
- •Resistance Indices
- •Cerebral Blood Flow
- •Cerebral Circulation Time
- •Cerebral Blood Volume
- •4 Pathogenesis of Stroke
- •Arterial Ischemia
- •Classification of Arterial Stroke
- •Microembolic Signals
- •Spontaneous Microemboli
- •Detection of Microemboli in Patent Foramen Ovale
- •Venous Ischemia
- •5 Vascular Pathology
- •Vessel Wall Pathology
- •Elongations
- •Intima-media Thickness
- •Atherosclerotic Plaques
- •Dissection
- •Fibromuscular Dysplasia
- •Vasculitis
- •Stenoses and Occlusions
- •Ultrasound Criteria of Stenoses
- •Ultrasound Criteria of Occlusions
- •Extracranial Pathology
- •Extracranial Anterior Circulation
- •Extracranial Posterior Circulation
- •Intracranial Pathology
- •Intracranial Anterior Circulation
- •Intracranial Posterior Circulation
- •Collateral Pathways
- •Intracranial Collateral Pathways
- •Intracranial Collateral Pathways in ICA Occlusive Processes
- •Intracranial Collateral Pathways in VA Occlusive Processes
- •Extracranial Collateral Pathways
- •Clinical Relevance of Collateral Pathways
- •6 Angiographic Techniques in Neuroradiology
- •Digital Subtraction Angiography
- •Historical Development
- •Technical Aspects
- •Strengths and Disadvantages
- •Magnetic Resonance Angiography
- •Historical Development
- •Technical Aspects
- •Strengths and Disadvantages
- •Computed Tomographic Angiography
- •Historical Development
- •Technical Aspects
- •Strengths and Disadvantages
- •Current Algorithm at the Charité University Hospital
- •Stroke
- •Intracranial Aneurysm
- •Vasculitis
- •Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
- •Peri-therapeutic Imaging
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course
- •Neurosonologic Findings (Day 20)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Part B: Case Histories
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 2)
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Cerebral CT
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 42)
- •Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 2)
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (1 Hour)
- •Clinical Course (3)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (Day 2)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (Day 7)
- •Clinical Course (3)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (6 Months)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 5)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (5 Years)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (2Months)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (5Months)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (6 weeks)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 3)
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (3 Months)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Evaluation of Collateral Function
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (Day 20)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Follow-up Neuroradiologic Findings (Day 3)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 3)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 4)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Neurosonologic Findings (Day 10)
- •Neuroradiologic Findings (Day 11)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques (6 Months)
- •Neurosonologic Findings (6 Months)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques (8 Months)
- •Neurosonologic Findings (8 Months)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •MRI and MR Angiography (10:00 Hours)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Neurosonologic Findings (12:00 Hours)
- •Conventional Angiography (16:00 Hours)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (6 Months)
- •Clinical Course (3)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 2)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 4)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Clinical Course (2) and Follow-up Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (10 Months)
- •Clinical Course (3)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings
- •Conventional Angiography
- •Clinical Course
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 2)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (4 Weeks)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
- •CT Angiography (CTA) (Day 1)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (Day 90)
- •Question to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (Day 180)
- •Clinical Course (2)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Initial Neuroradiologic Findings (Day 1)
- •Suspected Diagnosis
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 20)
- •Conventional Angiography (Day 22)
- •Clinical Course (1)
- •Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (Day 29)
- •Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (3 Months)
- •Final Diagnosis
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Index

Case 30 Multilocular Extra- and Intracranial Stenoses and Occlusions
346
Degree of Neurosonologic Difficulty: High
Fig. B30.25 Intracranial 3D TOF MRA: Absent left ICA signal. Re-
ducedsignalinbothproximalMCAs(arrows)aswellasinthedistal
ACAs (arrow). Note the intracranial right ICA (arrowheads).
Fig. B30.27 TCCS (transtemporal approach), left-sided insonation,
midbrain plane. Stenotic flow pattern of the left M1-MCA, but flow
velocities had decreased in comparison to the preceding investigation (flow velocity: 81/46 cm/s).
Fig. B30.26 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. High resistance
flow signal in the lef t ICA with a low and short systolic flow and
completely absent diastolic flow component consistent with distal
occlusion.
Fig. B30.28 TCCS (transtemporal approach), left-sided insonation,
midbrain plane. The left A1-ACA showed an orthograde, but marked
poststenotic flow pattern with obviously reduced flow velocity compared with the first examination (flow velocity: 53/33 cm/s).
Fig. B30.29 TCCS (transtemporal approach), left-sided insonation,
midbrain plane. Raised flow velocities were obser ved in the lef t P1PCA (flow velocity: 190/99 cm/s).
Fig. B30.30 TCCS (transtemporal approach), left-sided insonation,
upper pontine plane. Turbulences were detected in the left PCoA,
indicating collateralization of the left MCA and both ACA territories
via the left PCoA.

Final Diagnosis
347
Degree of Neurosonologic Difficulty: High
Fig. B30.31 TCCS (transforaminal approach), upper axial plane.
Marked nonturbulent flow in the BA (flow velocity: 208/108 cm/s).
Fig. B30.32 Intracranial CTA, axial MIP. Left M1-MCA stenosis (arrowhead) and right M1-MCA near occlusion (arrow). Note that both
A2-ACAs are supplied by a prominent left A1-ACA. Note also that
the left PCoA is not visualized.
Fig. B30.33 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Color-mode image revealed no flow signal. Doppler spectrum analysis showed a
stump signal in the proximal CCA. Note the echogenic material
within the distal CCA (arrows).
Fig. B30.34 Schematic drawing of the extra- and intracranial brainsupplying arteries of the patient in Case 30 (follow-up findings).
Persisting near occlusion of the right M1-MCA (circle). Persisting
leptomeningeal collateral blood flow to the right MCA territory from
the right PCA (green arrow). Left extracranial ICA, CCA, and ECA
occlusion (circle). Persisting left intracranial MCA stenosis. Collateral
blood flow for the left MCA and both ACA territories is from the
posterior circulation via the left PCoA.

Case 30 Multilocular Extra- and Intracranial Stenoses and Occlusions
348
Discussion
Clinical Aspects
This is an instructive case of a 41-year-old woman, which
gives insights into the topic of border zone infarction (BZI).
It also illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of the
currently available angiologicmethodstoassessintracranial high-grade stenosis or near occlusion in cases of complex multilocular stenoocclusive disorders.
Our patient initially presented with repeated sensory
TIAs which, because of their repeated and monomorphic
pattern were suggestive of hemodynamic events. Corre-
Degree of Neurosonologic Difficulty: High
spondingly, MRI detected an internal BZI on the right side,
presumably due to a near occlusion of the right MCA.
Thirty days later she developed a large second internal
BZI on the contralateral side, which led to severe akinetic
mutism. She was unable to communicate while her sensorimotor functions remained unchanged. Over time
spontaneous speech function reappeared to a minimal
level. Akinetic mutism following stroke can be caused by
lesions in different regions of the brain but most frequently it occurs in cases with damage of the anteromedial
frontal lobes (Nagaratnam et al. 2004). Bilateral anterior
cerebral infarction can lead to complete and persisting
akinetic mutism (Freeman 1971, Minagar and David
1999). Akinetic mutism as a result of bilateral internal
border zone infarction has not yet been reported.
BZIs, also called “watershed infarctions,” are caused by a
low-flow state in large brain-supplying arteries. Clinical
and autopsy studies suggest that up to 10 % of brain infarctions are of hemodynamic origin (Bladin and Chambers 1994, Jorgensen and Torvik 1969). Border zone infarction may occur in the anterior or in the posterior circulation along the boundaries between the vascular territories
of the major intracranial vessels. However, the exact natureandsignificanceofborderzonelesionsarestillbeing
debated (Momjian-Mayor and Baron 2005). Infratentorial
BZI of the cerebellum is less well understood and will not
be discussed further (Amarenco et al.1993). Supratentorial
border zone infarctions occur in high-grade stenosis or
occlusion of the ICA or MCA or occasionally in cases with
a profound temporary hypotension. In general, two types
of infarcts—external and internal BZIs—can be distinguished: The external BZIs present as wedge-shaped cortical/subcortical lesions localized between the ACA and
MCA territory (anterior external BZIs) and the MCA and
PCA, or MCA, PCA, and ACA territory (posterior external
BZIs). They are also called cortical BZIs. In occlusive ICA
disorders, mainly anterior external BZIs are observed. A
posterior external BZI may be present in fetal-type PCA or
in the case of additional stenoocclusive disease in the
vertebrobasilar circulation. Interestingly, there are no
clear-cut data on the correlation between the distribution
of cortical border zone infarcts and vessel status. The internal borderzone involves a subcortical area in the corona
radiata between the superficial and deep perforators of the
MCA or between the superficial perforators of the MCA
and ACA which represents the most distal part of ICA
perfusion. Internal BZI may appear rosarylike, i. e., in the
form of small in-linewhite matterlesions, or in the form of
a prominent cigar-shaped confluent pattern (Bladin and
Chambers 1993). The two infarct patterns may occur separately or together (for further detail see chapter 4, p. 68).
Diagnostically, clear differentiation between an external
BZI and a territorial infarction near the territorial border is
often difficult. This is particularly true as these borders
show a great variability depending on the variants of the
CW even under physiologic circumstances (van Laar et al.
2006). In chronic occlusive disease (e. g., chronic ICA occlusion) this border might further be shifted, resulting in a
smaller MCA territory. In this constellation, an external BZI
may appear morphologically as a cortical territorial infarction. But even in infarctions that are clearly localized
within the border zone, it may still be debatable whether
the underlying cause is hemodynamic or embolic or a
combination of both (Caplan and Hennerici 1998). A hypothesis for combined pathogenesis is that emboli are
more likely to develop and are at the same time less likely
to subsequently disintegrate in low-flow regions, such as
the border zones, afterwards leading to embolic infarcts
within the borders. A recent diffusion-weighted MR study
supports the above hypothesis of embolic mechanisms, at
least for external BZIs. The authors compared 45 patients
with internal BZIs and 75 patients with external BZIs. The
latter patients had more small cortical infarct patterns and
fewer stenoocclusive altered vessels. In people with internal BZIs, a rosarylike infarct pattern was found and more
underlying ICA or MCA stenoocclusive pathology was
present. Occlusion or marked stenosis (≥ 50 %) were found
in 91.1 % of patients with internal BZIs, but only in 73.3 % of
patients with external BZIs. The authors concluded that
embolism maytherefore have a greater role in external BZI
and that acute hypotensive events may be of more relevance in internal BZI (Yong et al. 2006). To further analyze
the underlying pathomechanisms and toquestion or prove
the embolic hypothesis several studies have been initiated
combining the assessment of large vessel status, ultrasound embolus detection and diffusion-weighted MRI. In
MCA stenosis, microembolic signals were more frequently
observed in patients with multiple lesions on diffusionweighted MR images, especially along the border zones,
whichwereconsideredtobecausedbyimpaireddisruption and clearance of emboli (Wong et al. 2002).
Angiologic Aspects
Our patient had severe atherosclerotic disease consisting
of multiple high-grade stenoses and occlusions affecting
the intra- and extracranial brain-supplying arteries, but
obviously sparing the posterior circulation.
The assessment of extracranial high-grade stenosis or
near occlusion, for example of the ICA, may pose questions,
and this is discussed in Case 15 (for further discussion see

Discussion
349
p. 215). It is therefore not surprising if imaging and assessment of intracranial high-grade stenosis and near occlusion seems even more difficult because of the smaller
vessel diameters (for further details see case 25, p. 297).
Theproblemcanbeillustratedbycomparingthedifferent
evaluations of the constant right M1-MCA vascular pathology in our patient: The initially performed TOF MRA
suggested a right proximal M1-MCA occlusion and an
A1-ACA occlusion. Careful assessment of the images revealed signals of the most proximal part of the M1-MCA
and A1-ACA segments, as well as an opercular branch. In
the long segment between both the branches no signal
was seen. Such a long “gap sign” is usually considered to
represent occlusion while a short gap frequently coincides
with a high-grade stenosis. However, this algorithm is a
rough measure only and results in high interobserver variability. Accordingly, a recent study that compared TOF
MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA revealed great discrepancies in findings of assumed main stem and branch occlusion(Yangetal.2005).Apartfromcontrast-enhanced
MRA, analysis of source images may be helpful in proving
vessel patency. In our experience it is also always valuable
to analyze standard T2-weighted images. In our patient, a
long-segmented signal void was clearly visible within the
main stem of the right MCA indicating a patent vessel and
at least a residual flow (Fig. B30.4).
DSA was the second technique to be used to further
analyze the presumed proximal M1-MCA and A1-ACA occlusion. The early arterial images seemed to confirm the
diagnosis but on evaluation of the late arterial phase, insular MCA branches, probably a very temporal branch, and
lenticulostriate arteries became visible, rather suggestive
of an MCA near occlusion (Fig. B30.17). Retrograde MCA
filling was not expected because of the concomitant occlusion of the ACA. Therefore, M2 and M3 branches that
became visible after right CCA injection had to be supplied
by the ICA itself. Currently, DSA is the reference method for
imaging of intracranial vessels. However, false-negative
findings have also been reported with this technique, for
example, in low-flow vessel segments in patients with
moyamoya disease when compared with ultrasound
(Muttaqin et al. 1993, Ruan et al. 2006), and also in distal
near occlusion of the BA in comparison to CTA (Bash et al.
2005). As in our patient presenting low flow due to atherosclerotic artery disease, false-negative results might occur if only early arterial phase images are analyzed. Therefore, evaluation of the late arterial phases is mandatory, so
that low-flow states in suspected occlusion are not overlooked.
ThethirdtechniquetobeusedwasCTA.SimilartoMRA
and early arterial DSA images, CTA MIP images revealed a
signal gap within the right M1-MCA segmentvisible in the
axial and the coronal planes. Based on CTA alone a unilateral right MCA occlusion would probably have been the
final diagnosis (Fig. B30.22).
Ultrasound in this special case was superior to the angiographic techniques as it demonstrated a long-segmental
orthograde M1-MCA segment on color-mode imaging (see
Fig. B30.12). Flow velocity in the proximal right M1-MCA
was increased to values found in moderate stenoses (flow
velocity: 161/74 cm/s). The marked poststenotic flow pattern of the subsequent vessel segments changed our interpretation to presence of a hemodynamically relevant
high-grade stenosis.
Extracranial TOF MRA was suggestive of a complete left
CCA, ECA, and ICA occlusion. While the ECA occlusion was
real, the CCA and proximal ICA were open on duplex ultrasound examination. However, they had a severe high resistance flow pattern with low systolic flow and missing
diastolic flow indicative of a distal ICA occlusion.
Besides the analysis of stenoses and occlusions, hemodynamic effect and the subsequently induced collateral
pathways pose another challenge for imaging. Collateral
function and stroke are closely related. Functional ultrasound analysis using a CCA compression test revealed that
a nonfunctional ACoA/PCoA was present in 33 %/57 % of
cases in a stroke patient population but only in 6 %/43%
of healthy controls (Hoksbergen et al. 2003a), implying
that individuals with hypoplastic or aplastic, i. e., nonfunctional communicating arteries may be more likely to have
an ischemic stroke. Also, in stroke patients, the quality of
collateral function has been shown to have considerable
influence on the clinical outcome. A DSA study in acute
anterior circulation occlusion showed that favorable collateralization had a higher odds ratio than successful recanalization (5.9 vs.1.9)in terms of a good clinical outcome
(Kucinski et al. 2003).
Direct imaging of the communicating arteries that contribute as collaterals in occlusive vessel disorders might be
difficult when using TOF MRA or CTA. In our case, for
example, neither of the techniques was able to depict the
signal of the important left PCoA. This can be explained by
the flow sensitivity of TOF MRA, impairing the detection of
raised turbulent flow. With CTA analysis, the imaging of
small vessel segments might be a question of choosing the
right post-processing technique. Consideration of source
images might also be helpful. TCCSis superiorif a sufficient
acoustic bone window is present. In our case collateral
blood flow to the left MCA and ACA was provided by the
left PCoA, which yielded a strong, highly turbulent flow on
TCCS evaluation. If no direct insonation is possible, indirect
sonographic signs may be used to prove the collateral flow
pattern. Increased flow velocities within the P1-PCA segment and almost normal flow velocities in the P2- and P3PCA segments in a patient with extracranial ICA occlusion
point to a direct PCoA collateral function. Raised flow
velocities in the distal PCA segments starting at the P2PCA segment indicate a leptomeningeal collateralization.
Visualization of a nonaltererd PCoA, however, is a major
concern for ultrasound methods also. In healthy young
subjects TCCS fails to directly visualize the PCoA in up to
35 %of cases (Klötzsch et al.1996) and in elderly patients in
up to 85 % of cases (Hoksbergen et al. 2000a). The low
detection rate is mainly explained by the low flow state
Degree of Neurosonologic Difficulty: High

Case 30 Multilocular Extra- and Intracranial Stenoses and Occlusions
350
in an unaffected PCoA, its small size, and the vessel course
which often does not run straight between anterior and
posterior circulation. Especially in elderly subjects, an
elongated vessel course can be frequently observed, lead-
Degree of Neurosonologic Difficulty: High
ing to equivocal or bidirectional flow patterns (for further
discussion on collateral vessels, see also Chapter 5, “Collateral Pathways,” p.101).

References 351
References
Aaslid R, Lindegaard KF, Sorteberg W, Nornes H. Cerebral autor-
egulation dynamics in humans. Stroke 1989;20:45–52
Abbott AL, Chambers BR, Stork JL, Levi CR, Bladin CF, Donnan GA.
Embolic signals and prediction of ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. A multicenter prospective cohort study. Stroke 2005;36:1128–1133
AbuRahma AF, Copeland SE. Bilateral internal carotid artery
occlusion: natural history and surgical alternatives. Cardiovasc Surg 1998;6:579–583
AbuRahma AF, Pollack JA, Robinson PA, et al. The reliability of
color duplex ultrasound in diagnosing total carotid occlusion.
Am J Surg 1997;174:185–187
AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Jennings TG. Carotid-subclavian
bypass grafting with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for symptomatic subclavian artery stenosis or occlusion: a 20-year
experience. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:411–418
Ackerstaff RG, Jansen C, Moll FL, Vermeulen FE, Hamerlijnck RP,
Mauser HW. The significance of microemboli detection by
means of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography monitoring
in carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:963–969
Ackerstaff RG, Moons KGM, van de Vlasakker CJW, et al. Associ-
ation of intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke
2000;31:1817–18 23
Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of sub-
type of acute stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter
clinical trial. Stroke 1993;24:35–41
AdamsHP,delZoppoG,AlbertsMJ,etal.Guidelinesfortheearly
management of adults with ischemic stroke. A guideline from
the American Heart Association / American Stroke Association. Stroke 2007;38:1655–1711
Ahl B, Bokemeyer M, Ennen JC, Kohlmetz C, Becker H,
Weissenborn K. Dissection of the brain supplying arteries
over the life span. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:
119 4 –1196
AkinsPT,GlennS,NemethPM,DerdeynCP.Carotidartery
thrombus associated with severe iron-deficiency anemia
and thrombocytosis. Stroke 1996;27:1002–1005
AkinsPT,PilgramTK,CrossDTIII,MoranCJ.Naturalhistoryof
stenosis from intracranial atherosclerosis by serial angiography. Stroke 1998;29:433–438
Aksoy FG, Lev MH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced brain perfusion
imaging: Technique and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21:462–477
Albers GW, Caplan LR, Easton JD, et al. Transient ischemic attack:
proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med 2002;347:
1713 –1716
AlecuC,FortratJO,DucrocqX,VespignaniH,deBrayJM.Duplex
scanning diagnosis of internal carotid dissections. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:441–447
Alexander CB, Burger PC, Goree JA. Dissecting aneurysms of the
basilar artery. Stroke 1979;10:294–299
Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Maggisano R, Norris JW. Measuring
carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal. Stroke 1993;24:
1292 –1296
Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Norris JW. Intracranial blood flow
velocities in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1378–1383
AlexandrovAV,BurginWS,DemchukAM,El-MitwalliA,
Grotta JC. Speed of intracranial clot lysis with intravenous
tissue plasminogen activator therapy. Sonographic classification and short-term improvement. Circulation 2001;103:
2897–2902
Alexandrov AV, Molina CA, Grotta JC, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced
systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med
2004;351:2170–2178
AlgraA,vanGijnJ.Aspirinatanydoseabove30mgoffersonly
modest protection after cerebral ischaemia. J Neurol Neuro-
surg Psychiatry 1996;60:197–199
Allendoerfer J, Goertler M, von Reutern GH. for the neurosonol-
ogy in acute ischemic stroke (NAIS) study group. Prognostic
relevance of ultra-early Doppler sonography inacute ischemic
stroke: a prospective multicenter study. Lancet Neurol
2006;5:835–840
Alper F, Kantarci M, Dane S, Gumustekin K, Onbas O, Durur I.
Importance of anatomical asymmetries of transverse sinuses:
an MR venographic study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;18:236–239
Al-Shahi R, Warlow C. A systematic review of the frequency and
prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in
adults. Brain 2001;124:1900–1926
Amarenco P, Case CS, Rosengart A, et al. Very small (border zone)
cerebellar infarcts: Distribution, mechanisms, causes and clin-
ical features. Brain 1993;116:161–186
Ambrose J, Hounsfield G. Computerized transverse axial tomog-
raphy. Br J Radiol 1973;46:148–149
Anderson DE, McLane MP, Reichman OH, Origitano TC. Improved
cerebral blood flow and CO2 reactivity after microvascular
anastomosis in patients at high risk for recurrent stroke. Neu-
rosurgery 1992;31:26–34
Anson J, Crowell RM. Cervicocranial arterial dissection. Neuro-
surgery 1991;29:89–96
Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms:
clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the
therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology
2001;218:799–808
Apruzzese A, Silvestrini M, Floris R, et al. Cerebral hemodynam-
ics in asymptomatic patients with internal carotid artery oc-
clusion: a dynamic susceptibility contrast MR and transcranial
Doppler study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1062–106 7
Arakawa S, Kamouchi M, Okada Y, et al. Ultrasonographically
predicting the extent of collateral flow through superficial
temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery anastomosis.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:886–891
Archie JPJr, Feldtman RW. Critical stenosis of the internal carotid
artery. Surgery 1981;89:67–72
Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, et al. The American College of
Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu
arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1129–1134
Arenillas JF, Alvarez-Sabin J. Basic mechanisms in intracranial
large-artery atherosclerosis: Advances and challenger. Cere-
brovasc Dis 2005;20(Suppl 2):775–783
Arenillas JF, Molina CA, Montaner J, Abilleira S, Gonzalez-
Sanchez MA, Alvarez-Sabin J. Progression and clinical recur-
rence of symptomatic middlecerebral artery stenosis: A long-
term follow-up transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. Stroke
2001;32:2898–2904
Ariyo AA, Thach C, Tracy R. Cardiovascular Health Study Inves-
tigators: Lp(a) lipoprotein, vascular disease and mortality in
the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2108–2115
Arning C. Nonatherosclerotic disease of the cervical arteries:
Role of ultrasonography for diagnosis. Vasa 2001;30:160–167
Arning C, Grzyska U. Color Doppler imaging of cervicocephalic
fibromuscular dysplasia. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2004;2:7
Arning C, Herrmann HD. Floating thrombus in the internal car-
otid artery disclosed by B-mode ultrasonography. J Neurol
1988;235:425–427

352 References
Arnold M, Bousser MG, Fahrni G, et al. Vertebral artery dissec-
tion. Presentig findings and predictors of outcome. Stroke
2006a;37:2499–2503
Arnold M, Kappeler L, Georgiadis D, et al. Gender differences in
spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Neurology 2006b;67:
1050–1052
Arteriovenous Malformation Study Group. Current concepts:
Arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults. N Engl J
Med 1999;340:1812–1818
Astrup J, Siesjö BK, Symon L. Tresholds in cerebral ischemia: the
ischemic penumbra. Stroke 1981;12:723–725
Auer A, Felber S, Schmidauer C, Waldenberger P, Aichner F. Mag-
netic resonance angiographic and clinical features of extracranial vertebral artery dissection.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:474–481
AyanzenRH,BirdCR,KellerFJ,McCulyFJ,TheobaldMR,
Heiserman JE. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy
and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2000;21:74–78
Bacon PA, Stevens RJ, Carruthers DM, Young SP, Kitas GD. Accel-
erated atherogenesis in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Autoimmun Rev 2002;1:338–347
Baehr D, Schreiber SJ, Doepp F, John M, Hornig S, Valdueza JM.
Increased prevalence of internal jugular valve incompetence
in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;16(Suppl 2):17
Ballotta E, Thiene G, Baracchini C, et al. Surgical vs medical
treatment for isolated internal carotid artery elongation
with coiling or kinking in symptomatic patients: a prospective
randomized clinical study. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:838–846
BamfordJ,SandercockP,DennisM,BurnJ,WarlowC.Class-
fication and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes
of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521–1526
Baquis GD, Pessin MS, Scott RM. Limb shaking: a carotid TIA.
Stroke 1985;16:444–448
Barbut D, Hinton RB, Szatrowski TP, et al. Cerebral emboli de-
tected during bypass surgery are associated with clamp removal. Stroke 1994;25:2398–2402
Barbut D, Yao FS, Lo YW, et al. Determination of size of aortic
emboli and embolic load during coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1262–1267
Ehrenfeld WK, Wylie EJ. Spontaneous dissection of the internal
carotid artery. Arch Surg 1976;111:1294–1301
BarnettHJ,TaylorDW,EliasziwM,etal.Benefitofcarotiden-
darterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis.North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–142 5
Barnett HJM, Peerless SJ, Kaufmann JCE. “Stump” of internal
carotid artery: a source for further cerebral embolic ischemia. Stroke 1978;9:448–456
BarnettSB,RottHD,terHaarGR,ZiskinMC,MaedaK.The
sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound. Ultrasound Med
Biol 1997;23:805–812
BarnettSB,terHaarGR,ZiskinMC,RottHD,DuckFA,MaedaK.
International recommendations and guidelines for the safe
use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med
Biol 2000;26:355–366
Baron JC. Mapping the ischemic penumbra with PET: implica-
tions for acute stroke treatment. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999;9:
193 –201
Baron JC, Bousser MG, Rey A, Guillard A, Comar D, Castaigne P.
Reversal of focal misery-perfusion syndrome by extra-intracranial arterial bypass in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: a
case study with 15O positron emission tomography. Stroke
1981; 12 : 454–459
Bartels E. Evaluation of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs)
with transcranial color-coded Duplex sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:1511–1517
Bartels E, Flügel KA. Evaluation of extracranial vertebral artery
dissection with duplex color-flow imaging. Stroke 1996;27:
290–295
Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJ. Diagnosing carotid
stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 2006;27:632–637
Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJ. Carotid stenosis index
revisted with direct CT angiography measurement of carotid
arteries to quantifx carotid setnosis. Stroke 2007;38:286–291
Bartolini A, Gasparetto B, Ajmar G, Amore R, Furlan M. Hemody-
namic assessmentof vascular malformations by angio CT with
generation of functional transit time images. Comput Med
Imaging Graph 1992;16:109–115
Bash S, Villablanca JP, Jahan R, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis
and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR
angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 2005;26:1012–1021
Basseti C, Bogousslavsky J, Eskenasy-Cottier AC. Spontaneous
intracranial dissection in the anterior circulation. Cerebrovasc
Dis 1994;4:170–174
Baumgartner RW, Arnold M, Baumgartner I, et al. Carotid dis-
section with and without ischemic events: local symptoms
and cerebral artery findings. Neurology 2001;57:827–832
Baumgartner RW, Baumgartner I, Mattle HP, Schroth G. Trans-
cranial color-coded duplex sonography in unilateral flow-restrictive extracranial carotid artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:777–783
Baumgartner RW, Baumgartner I, Mattle HP, Schroth G. Trans-
cranial color-coded duplex sonography in the evaluation of
collateral flow through the circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997a;18:127–133
Baumgartner RW, Bogousslavsky J. Clinical manifestations of
carotid dissection. Front Neurol Neurosci 2005;20:70–76
Baumgartner RW, Gonner F, Arnold M, Muri RM. Transtemporal
power- and frequency-based colour-coded duplex sonography of cerebral veins and sinuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
1997b; 18:1771–17 8 1
Baumgartner RW, Mattle HP, Schroth G. Assessment of >50% and
<50% intracranial stenoses by transcranial color-coded duplex
sonography. Stroke 1999;30:87–92
Baumgartner RW, Regard M. Role of impaired CO2 reactivity in
the diagnosis of cerebral low flow infarcts. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychi atr y 1994; 57: 814 –817
Baumgartner RW, Studer A, Arnold M, Georgiadis D. Recanalisa-
tion of cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:459–461
BeletskyV,NadareishviliZ,LynchJ,ShuaibA,WollfendenA,
Norris JW. Cercical arterial dissection: Time for a therapeutic
trail? Stroke 2003;34:2856–2860
Belkin M, Mackey WC, Pessin MS, Caplan LR, O’Donnell TF. Com-
mon carotid artery occlusion with patent internal and external carotid arteries: diagnosis and surgical magament. J Vasc
Su rg 1993; 17: 1019–1027
Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R, et al. Silent embolism in
diagnosticcerebral angiography and neurointerventionalprocedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594–1597
Benninger DH, Georgiadis D, Kremer C, Studer A, Nedeltchev K,
Baumgartner RW. Mechanism of ischemic infarct in spontaneous carotid dissection. Stroke 2004;35:482–485
Benninger DH, Georgiadis D, Gandjour J, Baumgartner RW. Ac-
curacy of color duplex ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous
carotid dissection causing ischemia. Stroke 2006;37:377–381

References 353
Berger JR, Harris JO, Gregorios J, Norenberg M. Cerebrovascular
disease in AIDS: a case-control study. AIDS 1990;4:239–244
Berguer R, Higgins R, Nelson R. Noninvasive diagnosis of reversal
of vertebral-artery blood flow. N Engl J Med 1980;302:
1349–1351
Berkefeld J, Enzensberger W, Lanfermann H. MRI in human
immunodeficiency virus-associated cerebral vasculitis. Neuroradiology 2000;42:526–528
Berthet K, Lavergne T, Cohen A, et al. Significant association of
atrial vulnerability with atrial septal abnormalities in young
patients with ischemic stroke of unknown cause. Stroke
2000;31:398–403
Bhadelia RA, Bengoa F, GesnerL, et al. Efficacyof MR angiography
in the detection and characterization of occlusive disease in
the vertebrobasilar system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:
458–465
Bhatt DL, Flather MD, Hacke W, et al. Patients with prior my-
ocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial
disease in the CHARISMA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:
198 2–1988
Biousse V, D`Anglejan-Chatillon J, Touboul PJ, Amarenco P,
Bousser MG. Time course of symptoms in extracranial internal
carotid artery dissections: A series of 80 patients. Stroke
1995;26:235–239
BiousseV,SchaisonM,TouboulPJ, D`Anglejan-Chatillon J,
Bousser MG. Ischemic optic neuropathy associated with internal carotid artery dissection. Arch Neurol 1998;55:715–719
Bisaria KK. Anatomic variations of venous sinuses in the region of
the torcular herophili. J Neurosurg 1985;62:90–95
Bisdas S, Nemitz O, Berding G, et al. Correlative assessment of
cerebral blood flow obtained with perfusion CT and positron
emission tomography in symptomatic stenotic carotid disease. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2220–2228
Bladin CF, Chambers BR. Clinical features, pathogenesis, and
computed tomographic characteristics of internal watershed
infarctions. Stroke 1993;24:1925–1932
Bladin CF, Chambers BR. Frequency and pathogenesis of hemo-
dynamic stroke. Stroke 1994;25:2179–2182
Bley TA, Uhl M, Carew J, et al.Diagnostic value ofhigh-resolution
MR imaging in giant cell arteritis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2007;28:1722–1727
Bley TA, Wieben O, Uhl M, Thiel J, Schmidt D, Langer M. High-
resolution MRI in giant cell arteritis: imaging of the wall of the
superficial temporal artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:
283–287
Bock CA. Darstellung der Venen des menschlichen Körpers.
Leipzig: Baumgärtner; 1823.
Bock RW, Gray-Weale AC, Mock PA, et al. The natural history of
asymptomatic carotid artery disease. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:
160 –169
Boczko ML, Caplan LH. Alteration of flow dynamics in the carotid
artery system of “stroke” patients. Clinical and arteriographic
study. Invest Radiol 1967;2:33–40
Bogdahn U, Becker G, Winkler J, Greiner K, Perez J, Meurers B.
Transcranial color-coded real-time sonography in adults.
Stroke 1990;21:1680–16 88
BogousslavskyJ,VanMelleG,RegliF.TheLausanneStroke
Registry: analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with first
stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1083
Bonati LH, Kessel-Schaefer A, Linka AZ, et al. Diffusion-weighted
imaging in stroke attributable to patent foramen ovale: significance of concomitant atrial septum aneurysm. Stroke
2006;37:2030–2034
Bornstein NM, Norris JW. Subclavian steal: a harmless haemo-
dynamic phenomenon? Lancet 1986;2:303–305
–1092
Borozan PG, Schuler JJ, LaRosa MP, Ware MS, Flanigan DP. The
natural history of isolated carotid siphon stenosis. J Vasc Surg
198 4;1 : 74 4 –749
Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, et al. A novel, self-expanding,
nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atheroscler-
otic stenoses: the Wingspan study. Stroke 2007;38:1531–1537
Bostom AG, Rosenberg IH, Silberhatz H, et al. Nonfasting plasma
total homocysteine levels and stroke incidence in elderly
persons: the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:
352–355
Bousser MG, Welch KM. Relation between migraine and stroke.
Lancet Neurol 2005;4:533–542
Brandt T, Grond-Ginsbach C. Spontaneous cervical artery dissek-
tion. From risk factors toward pathogenesis. Stroke 2002;33:
657–658
Brandt T, Hausser I, Orberk E, et al. Ultrastructural connective
tissue abnormalities in patients with spontaneous cervico-
cerebral artery dissections. Ann Neurol 1998;44:281–285
Brandt T, Knauth M, Wildermuth S, et al. CT angiography and
Doppler sonography for emergency assessment in acute basi-
lar artery ischemia. Stroke 1999;30:606–612
Brandt T, Steinke W, Thie A, Pessin MS, Caplan LR. Posterior
cerebral artery territory infarcts: clinical features, infarct top-
ography, causes and outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:
170 –182
Brandt T, von Kummer R, Müller-Kuppers M, Hacke W. Throm-
bolytic therapy of acute baslar artery occlusion: variables
affecting recanalization and outcome. Stroke 1996;27:
875–881
Braun J, Nolte C, Einhäupl KM, Villringer A, Valdueza JM. One
stroke – two triggers. J Neurol 2006;253:1356–1357
BroomeDR,GirguisMS,BaronPW,etal.Gadodiamide-associ-
atednephrogenicsystemicfibrosis:whyradiologistsshould
be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:586–592
Brozici M, Van der Zwan A, Hillen B. Anatomy and functionality
of leptomengeal anastomoses: a review. Stroke 2003;34:
2750–2762
Buchan A, Gates P, Pelz D, Barnett HJM. Intraluminal thrombus in
the cerebral circulation: implications for surgical manage-
ment. Stroke 1988;19:681–687
Buijs PC, Krabbe-Hartkamp MJ, Bakker CJ, et al. Effect of age on
cerebral blood flow: measurement with ungated two-dimen-
sional phase-contrast MR angiography in 250 adults. Radiol-
ogy 1998;209:667–674
Burger IM, Murphy KJ, Jordan LC, et al. Safety of cerebral digital
subtraction angiography in children: complication rate anal-
ysis in 241 consecutive diagnostic angiograms. Stroke
2006;37:2535–2539
Busuttil SJ, Franklin DP, Youkey JR, Elmore JR. Carotid duplex
overestimation of stenosis due to severe contralateral disease.
Am J Surg 1996;172:144–147
Cabanes L, Mas JL, Cohen A. Atrial septal aneurysm and patent
foramen ovale as risk factors for cryptogenic stroke in patients
less than 55 years of age: a study using transesophageal
echocardiography. Stroke 1993;24:1865–1873
Calabrese LH, Duna GF. Evaluation and treatment of central
nervous systemvasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1995;7:37–44
Call GK, Fleming MC, Sealfon S, Levine H, Kistler JP, Fisher CM.
Reversible cerebral segmental vasoconstriction. Stroke
1988;19:1159–1170
Canhao P, Falcao F, Ferro JM. Thrombolytics for cerebral sinus
thrombosis: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15:
159–166
Caplan LR. “Top of the basilar” syndrome: selected clinical as-
pects. Neurology 1980;30:72–79

References354
Caplan LR. Bilateral distal vertebral artery occlusion. Neurology
198 3;3 3:552 –558
Caplan LR. Migraine and vertebrobasilar ischemia. Neurology
1991; 41:55–61
Caplan LR. Posterior Circulation Disease: Clinical Findings, Diag-
nosis, and Management. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishers; 1996
Caplan LR, Amarenco P, Rosengart A, et al. Embolism from verte-
bral artery origin disease. Neurology 1992;42:1505–1512
Caplan LR, Baquis G, Pessin MS, et al. Dissection of the intra-
cranial vertebral artery. Neurology 1988;38:868–879
Caplan LR, Gorelick PB, Hier DB. Race, sex and occlusive cere-
brovascular disease: a review. Stroke 1986;17:648–655
Caplan LR, Hennerici M. Impaired clearance of emboli (washout)
is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and
ischemic stroke.Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;55:1475–1e482
Caplan LR, Sergay S. Positional cerebral ischemia. J Neurol Neu-
rosurg Psychiatry 1976;39:385–391
Caplan LR, Stein R, Patel D, Amico L, Cashman N, Gewertz B.
Intraluminal clot of the carotid artery detected radiographically. Neurology 1984;34:1175–1181
Caplan LR, Wityk RJ, Glass TA, et al. New England Medical Center
Posterior Circulation Registry. Ann Neurol 2004;56:389–398
Cardoso JS, Moura B, Martins L, Mota-Miranda A, Rocha GF,
Lecour H. Left ventricular dysfunction in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Int J Cardiol 1998;63:
37–45
CASANOVAStudyGroup.Carotidsurgeryversusmedicaltherapy
in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 1991;22:1229–1235
CaselliRJ, HunderGG, Whisnant JP. Neurologic diseasein biopsy-
proven giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Neurology 1988;38:
352–359
Castaigne P, Lhermitte F, Gautier J, et al. Arterial occlusions in the
vertebro-basilar system: a study of 44 patients with postmortem data. Brain 1973;96:133–154
Castel JP, Kantor G. Morbidity and mortality after surgical treat-
ment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurochirurgie 2001;47:369–383
CAVATAS investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment
in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral
Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1729–1737
Celsis P, Chan M, Marc-Vergnes JP, etal. Measurementof cerebral
circulation time in man. Eur J Nucl Med 1985;10:426–431
Chan WS, Ray J, Wai EK. Risk of stroke in women exposed to low-
dose oral contraceptives: a critical evaluation of the evidence.
Ar ch Inte rn Me d 20 0 4;164: 741–747
Chang CL, Donaghy M, Poulter N, The World Health Organisation
Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid
Hormone Contraception. Migraine and stroke in young
women: case-control study. BMJ 1999;318:13–18
Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC. Comparison of computed
tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis.
Neurosurgery 2003;52:624–631
Chaves C, Estol C, Esnaola MM, et al. Spontaneous intracranial
internal carotid artery dissection: report of 10 patients. Arch
Neurol 2002;59:977–981
Chen A, Shyr MH, Chen TY, et al. Dynamic CT perfusion imaging
with acetazolamide challenge for evaluation of patients with
unilateral cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disease. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 2006;27:1876–1881
Chen CJ, Lee TH, Hsu HL, et al. Multi-slice angiography in diag-
nosing total versus near occlusion of the internal carotid
artery. Comparison with catheter angiography. Stroke
2004a;35:83–85
ChenCJ,TsengYC,LeeTH,HsuHL,SeeLC.MultisectionCT
angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2004b;25:769–774
Chen M, Caplan L. Intracranial dissections. Front Neurol Neurosci
2005;20:160–173
Chetty R, Batitang S, Nair R. Large artery vasculopathy in HIV-
positive patients: another vasculitic enigma. Hum Pathol
2000;31:374–379
Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J, et al. The Warfarin-Aspirin
Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology 1995;45:
1488 –1493
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, et al. Comparison of
warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial
stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–1316
Chiu D, Shedden P, Bratina P, Grotta JC. Clinical features of
moyamoya disease in the united states. Stroke 1998;29:
1347–1351
Choi CG, Lee DH, Lee JH, et al. Detection of intracranial athero-
sclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:439–446
Choi JH, Mohr JP. Brain arteriovenous malformations in adults.
Lancet Neurol 2005;4:299–308
Chou CH, Chao AC, Hu HH. Ultrasonographic evaluatipn of verte-
bral venous valves. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:
1418–1420
Christoforidis GA, Mohammad Y, KehagiasDm Avutu B, Slivka AP.
Angiographic assessment of pial collaterals as a prognostic
indicator following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1789–179 7
Chung JW, Kim HC, Choi YH, Kim SJ, Lee W, Park JH. Patterns of
aortic involvement in Takayasu arteritis and its clinical implication: evaluation with spiral computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:906–914
Cina CS, Clase CM, Hynes RB. Carotid endarterectomy for symp-
tomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;
(2):CD001081
Clark WM, Wissman S, Albers GW, et al. Recombinant tissue-
type plasminogen activator (Alteplase) for ischemic stroke 3
to 5 hours after sympton onset. The ATLANTIS Study: a randomised controlled trial. Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute
Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke. JAMA
1999;282:2019–2026
Cloft HJ, Jensen ME, Kallmes DF, Dion JE. Arterial dissections
complicating cerebral angiography and cerebrovascular interventions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:541–545
Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in
patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm,
and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke
199 9;3 0:317–320
Cloud GC, Crawley F, Clifton A, McCabe DJH, Brown MM,
Markus HS. Vertebral artery origin angioplasty and primary
stenting: safety and restenosis rates in a prospective series. J
Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:586–590
Collaborative WHO. Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid
Hormone Contraception. Ischemic stroke and combined oral
contraceptives: results of an international, multicentre, casecontrol study. Lancet 1996;348:498–505
Combe J, Poinsard P, Besancenot J, et al. Free-floating thrombus
of the extracranial internal carotid artery. Ann Vasc Surg
199 0;4 : 558–562

References 355
ConnorMD,LammieGA,BellJE,WarlowCP,SimmondsP,
Brettle RD. Cerebral infarction in adult AIDS patients: observations from the Edinburgh HIV Autopsy Cohort. Stroke
2000;31:2117–2126
Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral He-
modynamic Symposium. Basic identification criteria of Doppler microembolic signals. Stroke 1995;26:1123–1124
Coutts SB, Simon JE, Eliasziw M, et al. Triaging transient ischemic
attack and minor stroke patients using acute magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 2005;57:848–854
Crompton MR. The visual changes in temporal (giant-cell) arter-
itis. Report of a case with autopsy findings. Brain 1959;82:
377–390
Crouse JR. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art. J Lipid Res
2006;47:1677–169 9
Cullinane M, Wainwright R, Brown A, Monaghan M, Markus HS.
Asymptomatic embolization in subjects with atrial fibrillation
not taking antikoagulants. A prospective study. Stroke
199 8;2 9 : 1810–1815
Curry TK, Messina LM. Fibromuscular dysplasia: when is inter-
vention warranted? Semin Vasc Surg 2003;16:190–199
DaffertshoferM,GassA,RinglebP,etal.Transcraniallow-fre-
quency ultrasound-mediated thrombolysis in brain ischemia:
increased risk of hemorrhage with combined ultrasound and
tissue plasminogen activator: results of a phase II clinical trial.
Stroke 2005;36:1441–144 6
de Bray JM, Glatt B. Quantification of artheromatous stenosis in
the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis
1995; 5:414–426
de Bray JM, Joseph P,Jeanvoine H, Maugin D, Dauzat M, Plassard F.
Transcranial Doppler evaluation of middle cerebral artery
stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:611–616
de Bray JM, Marc G, Pautot V, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia may
herald symptomatic recurrence of cervical artery dissection.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:448–452
de Bray JM, Pasco A, Tranquart F, et al. Accuracy of color-Doppler
in the quantification of proximal vertebral artery stenoses.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;11:335–340
de Bray JM, Penisson-Besnier I, Dubas F, Emile J. Extracranial and
intracranial vertebrobasilar dissections: diagnosis and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;63:46–51
de Bray JM, Zenglein JP, Laroche JP, et al. Effect of subclavian
syndrome on the basilar artery. Acta Neurol Scand 1994;90:
174–178
de Bruijn SF, Stam J. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of
anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin
for cerebral sinus thrombosis. Stroke 1999;30:484–488
de Freitas GR, André C. Sensitivity of transcranial Doppler for
confirming brain death: a prospective study of 270 cases. Acta
Neurol Scand 2006;113:426–432
de GrootK, Gross WL. Wegenersgranulomatosis: disease course,
assessment of activity and extent and treatment. Lupus
199 8;7:28 5–291
de la Monte SM, Moore GW, Hutchins GM. Patterned distribution
of metastases from malignant melanoma in jumans. Cancer
Res 1983;43:3427–3433
de Monye C, Dippel DW, Dijkshoorn ML, Tanghe HL, van der
Lugt A. MDCT detection of fibromuscular dysplasia of the
internal carotid artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:
W367–W369
Del Corso L, Moruzzo D, Conte B, et al. Tortuosity, kinking, and
coiling of the carotid artery: expression of atherosclerosis or
aging? Angiology 1998;49:361–371
Delcker A, Haussermann P, Weimar C. Effect of echo contrast
media on visualization of transverse sinus thrombosis with
transcranial 3-D duplex sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol
1999;25:1063–1068
Demchuk AM, Burgin WS, Christou I, et al. Thrombolysis in brain
ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clin-
ical severity, early recovery, and mortality in patients treated
with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke
2001;32:89–93
Demchuk AM, Christou I, Wein TH, et al. Specific transcranial
Doppler flow findings related to the presence and site of
arterial occlusion. Stroke 2000;31:140–146
Denzel C, Balzer K, Muller KM, Lell M, Lang W. Imaging techni-
ques for showing the morphology and surface structure of
extracranial internal carotid artery plaques. Dtsch Med Wo-
chenschr 2005;130:1267–1272
Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Turjman F, et al. Intravenous tPA in
acute ischemic stroke related to internal carotid artery dis-
section. Neurology 2000;54:2159–2161
Desai MY, Stone JH, Foo TK, Hellmann DB, Lima JA, Bluemke DA.
Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI of the aortic wall in Takaya-
su`s arteritis: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2005;184:1427–1431
Desfontaines P, Despland PA. Dissection of the internal carotid
artery: aetiology, symptomatology, clinical and neurosono-
logical floow-up, and treatment in 60 consequtive cases.
Acta Neurol Belg 1995;95:226–234
Diehl RR. Cerebral autoregulation studies in clinical practice. Eur
JUltrasound2002;16:31–36
Diehl RR, Berlit P. Funktionelle Dopplersonographie in der Neu-
rologie. Berlin– Heidelberg: Springer; 1996
Diehl RR, Henkes H, Nasher HC, Kuhne D, Berlit P. Blood flow
velocity and vasomotor reactivity in patients with arteriove-
nous malformations. A transcranial Doppler study. Stroke
199 4;2 5 : 1574–1580
Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P. Phase relationship between
cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure. A clinical test
of autoregulation. Stroke 1995;26:1801–1804
DienerHC,BogousslavskyJ,BrassLM,etal.MATCHinvestigators.
Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone
after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:331–337
Diener HC, Kurth T, Dodick D. Patent foramen ovale, stroke, and
cardiovascular disease in migraine. Curr Opin Neurol 2007;20:
310–319
Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, Barnett HJ, Blom RJ. Clinical events
following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke
1987;18 : 997 –10 04
Dippel DW, van Kooten F, Bakker SL, Koudstaal PJ. Interobserver
agreement for 10% categories of angiographic carotid stenosis.
Stroke 1997;28:2483–2485
Dittrich R, Dziewas R, Ritter MA, et al. Negative ultrasound
findings in patients with cervical artery dissection. Negative
ultrasound in CAD. J Neurol 2006;253:424–433
Divry P, Van Bogaert L. Sur une maladie familiale characterisée
par une angiomatose diffuse cortico-méningéenoncalcifi-
cante et une démyélinisation progressive de la substance
blanche. J Neurosurg 1946;9:42–54
Doege CA, Tavakolian R, Kerskens CM, et al. Perfusion and dif-
fusion magnetic resonance imaging in human cerebral venous
thrombosis. J Neurol 2001;248:564–571
Doepp F, Hoffmann O, Einhäupl KM, Valdueza JM. Normal blood
flow velocities in the distal jugular vein and response during
compression of the contralateral internal jugular vein. Cere-
brovasc Dis 1998;8(Suppl 3):1–21
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
