Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5199_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
59 Мб
Скачать
6.18 Case 18
159
Fig. 6.139 Maxillary framework design. (a) Labial and occlusal view. (b) A4-short buccally retained clasp
a
Fig. 6.140 Check for no metal exposure with the esthetic dental assistant
b
160
6 Case Analysis ofEsthetic Clasp
a
e
b
Fig. 6.141 (continued)
a
c
d
Fig. 6.141 Mandibular framework design. (a) Buccal view. (b) Occlusal view. (c) D7, D8-united short-arm clasp. (d) D4-C clasp. (e) C8-ring clasp
b
Fig. 6.142 Grinding and polishing after the framework forming. (a) Maxillary framework completion. (b) Mandibular framework completion
6.18 Case 18
Fig. 6.143 The teeth arrangement and wax pattern
Fig. 6.144 Trying in of the
wax pattern
161
Fig. 6.145 Comparison before and after restoration in the facial frontal view
162
Fig. 6.146 Comparison before and after restoration in the facial lateral view

6.19 Case 19

E-Clasps Combined with Deformed Occlusal Rest in Digital Framework RPD Design to Correct Spee Curve
1. Before repair A woman, 60 years old. Maxillary and mandibular
dentition defects have been for more than 30 years.
Smile analysis: The patient’s face is symmetrical with
a relatively normal proportion, and the height of basifa­cial 1/3 is acceptable (Fig.6.147). The patient has a low smile line, whose upper teeth cannot be exposed when smiling. The esthetic teeth are C4–D3 with the visible cervix of teeth (Fig.6.148).
Dentition analysis: The patient with Kennedy III den-
tition defect in the upper and lower jaw has deep overbite (Fig.6.149). And there is no bounce or pain in the tem­poromandibular joints. Her oral hygiene is average.
2. RPD analysis design and manufacturing We design a lingual bar as the maxillary major con-
nector to reduce globus sensation. Short buccally retained clasp is placed on the abutments A5, B4, C4, and D2 to reduce the clasp exposure when smiling. A combined clasp is placed on B6 and B7 to ensure the retention of the maxillary framework.
Because the remaining teeth of the lower jaw are worn,
the contour of the retaining teeth is utilized for clasp design as full as possible. The undercut of C4 is concen­trated on the lingual surface, so a three-arm clasp with lingual retentive arm and buccal resistant arm is designed. At the same time, taking advantage of the existing gap between D2 and D3, a short buccally retained clasp is placed on D2. A distal adjacent surface plate is placed on
6 Case Analysis ofEsthetic Clasp
Fig. 6.147 Facial analysis. Normal proportion of the three courts and proper height of lower facial 1/3
D3 to enhance friction retention. Because the crown of C7 is short, metal occlusal surface is designed on C7 to restore a certain occlusal curve. The major connector design of the mandible framework adopts a lingual plate to ensure the stability of the framework (Fig.6.150); try the wax pattern in the mouth after teeth arrangement (Fig.6.151). When the patient is satised, complete the restoration (Fig.6.152).
3. After restoration The nal repair effect is shown in Fig.6.153. The clasp
exposure is minimal when the patient smiles. The maxil­lary articial teeth and denture base improve the facial pro­trusion. The patient’s face is younger than the condition before restoration (Fig.6.154). She is quite contented.
6.19 Ca se 19
Fig. 6.148 Smile analysis. This patient is low smile line. Esthetic teeth are C4–D3
163
Fig. 6.149 Intraoral view
164
Fig. 6.150 Framework design
6 Case Analysis ofEsthetic Clasp
Fig. 6.151 Trying in after teeth arrangement
6.19 Ca se 19
Fig. 6.152 Restoration completion
165
Fig. 6.153 Intraoral view with denture
166
6 Case Analysis ofEsthetic Clasp
Fig. 6.154 Comparison before and after restoration. (a) Facial frontal view. (b) Facial lateral view
a
b

6.20 Case 20

E-Clasps Combined with Metal Occlusal Surface in Digital Framework RPD Design for Patient with Dentition Defect and Insufcient Restoration Space
1. Before restoration A male, 52 years old. Ten years ago, the patient under-
went maxillary and mandibular prosthesis. Due to the partial fracture of the denture clasp, the denture was unstable. Now, he requires restoration.
The patient has a scar on the left cheek, mouth- opening
limitation, and poor oral hygiene condition. The patient has Kennedy III dentition defect on the maxilla and Kennedy IV dentition defect on the mandible. There is a residual root B4 and deep overbite. His occlusion is so tight that the left mandibular teeth contact on the maxil­lary alveolar ridge. The position of the alveolar ridge in
the upper jaw is too close to the outside of paired jaw teeth. If the occlusal function is ensured according to the conventional teeth arrangement and occlusal design, the position of the articial teeth will be too close to the lin­gual side, which affects the esthetics. Or if we arrange teeth and improve esthetics in accordance with the con­tour of the upper jaw, this position will lose occlusal con­tact, which affects function and may cause elongation of the paired jaw teeth. Therefore, in this case, the design of dentures with both esthetics and function becomes dif­cult. In addition, a large amount of soft tartar deposits can be seen in the patient’s mouth, which indicates his poor oral hygiene (Figs.6.155 and 6.156).
2. RPD analysis design and manufacturing In consideration of both esthetics and function of the
denture, we apply the design of double dentition for B4, B5, and B6in the upper jaw: the inner metal occlusal sur-
6.20 Case 20
167
Fig. 6.155 Intraoral view
Fig. 6.156 Intraoral partial view
168
6 Case Analysis ofEsthetic Clasp
face to restore function and the outer plastic articial tooth to improve esthetics. In the anterior region, a united short-arm clasp is placed on A3 and A4, and a short buc­cally retained clasp is placed on B3. At the same time, a three-arm clasp is placed on B7in the posterior region to ensure the retention of the framework. A rest is set on B7, and a lingual plate is used as the major connector to ensure the entire stability. On C4 and C5, D4, and D5in the lower jaw, united short-arm clasps are placed to ensure retention (Fig. 6.157). After the framework is
Fig. 6.157 Framework design
completed (Fig.6.158), try it in the mouth. The denture is in good position, the clasps t the abutment, the retention force is moderate, and there is no movement (Fig.6.159). The restoration is nally completed (Fig.6.160).
3. After restoration There is little clasp exposure, and denture is retentive
and stable without movement. This solution restore the patient’s occlusal function while taking into account the esthetics. Finally, the patient expresses satisfaction (Fig.6.161).
Fig. 6.158 Framework completion