Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2617_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
59 Мб
Скачать
18
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Lippi et al.
of nancial processes and costs, and “intelligent systems” equipped with logical activities that include calculations and comparisons (e.g., with previous data of the same patient), up to “expert systems” for the validation of analytical results and the management of appropriateness.
Organizational Models oftheLaboratory Network
The organization of laboratories in a homogeneous geo­graphical area (corporate, district, provincial, regional, and even national) has undergone considerable changes over the years. Simplifying, we have passed from a model (typical in the 70s) of extreme parceling out of laboratory diagnostics (facilities operating below a critical performance mass) to a model of progressive integration and consolidation, which has led to the unication or closure of numerous territorial realities. In Italy, this change was strongly supported by law number 296 of December 27, 2006, which states that “the Regions shall approve a reorganization plan of the network of public and private accredited facilities providing specialist services and laboratory diagnostics, in order to adjust the organizational and personnel standards consistent with the processes of increased efciency made possible by the use of automated methods.” The general principles that guide the reorganization process must be:
• Close interrelation between the type of hospital and type of hospital laboratory
• Hospital territory continuity
• Proximity to the needs of the patient and the clinician
• The role of continuing education and research
• The role of information systems and (health) technology assessment
• The role of external quality assurance
• Centrality of the promotion and control of appropriateness
• The role of a targeted reporting system on laboratory activities
ight to London from Washington, Miami, Baltimore, Indianapolis, and Atlanta, the daily number of ights from the Atlanta hub was increased (thus increasing the offer of departure times), eliminating those from spoke airports and transporting passengers by connecting ights from periph­eral airports to that of Atlanta.
In general, the hub-and-spoke model has also progres­sively spread to the organization of health-care structures and has created an impact in terms of services provided. In this case, borrowing the model of aviation, there has been, within homogeneous geographical areas, a progressive reor­ganization of laboratory facilities, also divided into spoke (peripheral laboratories) and hub (central laboratories). The former has, therefore, been assigned a much lower degree of complexity (in relation to the types and number of tests per­formed) than has the latter. In this perspective, instead of transporting passengers from a peripheral airport to the cen­tral one, it was planned to transport patients’ test tubes from a peripheral laboratory to the central one. In the economy of scale, this allowed considerable savings related to the aboli­tion of duplicate analyses between two laboratories in prox­imity, thus saving on the number of instruments, reagents, and personnel. This model functionally operates according to a network in which each laboratory has a well-dened task and function (Fig.3.3) and is qualitatively and economically sustainable after an accurate feasibility study. Briey, it is necessary to create a balance between two opposing models, characterized by an unjustied multiplication of laboratories in the same area and by an irrational concentration of exams in laboratory “mega-structures” that, because of distance and volume, risk losing proximity to the clinician and the patient. In concrete terms, the facilities operating within a network should be characterized by a proper balance between general laboratories, also divided into specialized sectors, and spe­cialized laboratories with organizational autonomy. This can be achieved in relation to the discipline and the type of activ­ity involved, even for over-company catchment areas, and in explicit compliance with all the criteria provided in the reor­ganization process. Therefore, effective departmental inte-
The paradigm that has inspired most reorganization pro­cesses is the so-called hub-and-spoke model. This model was developed in the United States following the deregulation of commercial civil aviation and was originally introduced by the airline Delta in 1955, with the identication of Atlanta airport as the nodal point on which to concentrate most long­distance ights. In particular, the channeling of long-distance connections to a reference pole, called a hub, and the cre­ation of a series of connecting ights from peripheral air­ports, called spoke, allowed the company to make much more efcient use of resources without penalizing passen­gers too much. In essence, instead of starting a daily direct
Spoke
Spoke
HUB
Spoke
Spoke
Fig. 3.3 Organization of a network of laboratories according to the hub-and-spoke model. (Copyright EDISES 2021. Reproduced with permission)
Spoke
Spoke
3 Elements ofBiomedical Laboratory Organization
https://t.me/medicina_free
19
gration of the structures in the corporate, supra-provincial, and regional network must be developed, through a strong level of coordination, sharing of management processes, quality policies, and continuous staff training. Another criti­cal aspect concerns the transport of samples, especially when the distance between the central and peripheral laboratories is considerable and transport is further complicated by com­plex orography (mountains, busy roads). The use of systems that allow adequate storage of samples and monitoring of transport conditions is therefore essential to ensure the integ­rity of samples and the quality of the results. In this highly complex scenario, there is also the problem related to the so-called decentralized diagnostics, carried out using point­of- care instrumentation, which is not dealt with in this chapter.
Roles oftheLaboratory Sta
In the description of the different professional gures work­ing in a laboratory, it is important to underline how the activ­ity is always, in any case, carried out as a team, in a harmonious equilibrium prodromal to the production of the results in the form of the nal report. For the sake of simplic­ity, we will describe in this part of the chapter the roles and functions of the director, the health manager, and the labora­tory technicians, since only for them, in Italy, there is a pro­fessional prole well-dened by law regarding the functions to be performed in a laboratory.
The gure of a laboratory director requires a length of service of no less than 7years in the discipline, a specializa­tion diploma in the discipline, or a length of service of 10 years in the discipline, participation in a management training course, and a suitable professional case history. It should be noted that law number 229 of June 19, 1999, iden­ties only one level of management for access to the apical position of director of complex operational units (UOCs) of laboratory analysis and/or clinical pathology and/or clinical biochemistry (or other similar denominations). They are, therefore, provided for single competition procedures for graduated doctors, biologists, and chemists, provided they have a specialization, thus emphasizing the subordination of the degree to the course of study and professional. In the event of an absence or an impediment, the director delegates his/her functions to a collaborating manager. In summary, the director in charge of abiomedical laboratory performs a series of complex tasks that include:
• Negotiation of the budget of the laboratory for which he/
she is responsible and transmission (“cascading”) of the
outcome of the negotiations
• Choice and approval of analytical methods, being person-
ally responsible for the reliability of test results
• Formulation of proposals for the acquisition of diagnostic systems, taking into account the state of the art of technol­ogy, consistent with predened nancial sustainability
• Organization of services and quality control, being per­sonally responsible for the suitability of equipment and facilities
• Signature of the results of analyses and/or diagnostic judgments
• Recording and archiving of test results
• Application of the internal regulations (hygienic state of the premises, good functionality of the installations, and materials used)
• Response to warnings and complaints
• Application of the rules protecting operators against the risks arising from the specic activity
• Formulation and management of proposals for the updat­ing and continuous training of personnel health in light of the company’s mission and the resources actually available
The gure of a health manager (doctor, biologist, chem-
ist, or other qualifying degrees), who works in a labora­tory, is purely managerial, requiring specic skills in the organization of activities for maintaining and improving the quality of the results, and is also expressed through an activity of advice to clinicians on the appropriateness of the request, interpretation of the results, and possible con­tinuation of the diagnostic process. A manager, however, enjoys a relative professional autonomy, as dened by his/ her organizational or functional assignment, subordinate to the organization of the activities dened by the director. Within his/her sphere of responsibility, a manager orga­nizes the activities of his/her sector in collaboration with the director, the technical coordinator, and the technical and auxiliary staff and participates in the solution of clini­cal questions using the diagnostic potential assigned. Access to health management in the laboratory requires a university degree, an exam qualifying the profession and its registration, and a postgraduate specialization in a qual­ifying discipline (clinical biochemistry, clinical pathology, microbiology, or equivalent). It follows, therefore, that the prole of a health manager is that of a professional who has in his/her curriculum vitae no less than 9–10years of targeted studies (degree and specialization) that allow him/ her to perform and/or coordinate analytical activities, both clinical and managerial. It is important to remember that, following the ItalianInter-ministerial Decree number 68 of February 4, 2015, on the reorganization of specializa­tion schools in the health area, the specializations of clini­cal pathology and clinical biochemistry have been merged under the new name of specialization in clinical pathology and clinical biochemistry. In summary, a specialist in this discipline must:
20
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Lippi et al.
• Develop theoretical, scientic, and professional knowl­edge (including the relative assistance activities) in the eld of diagnostic clinical pathology and laboratory methodology in cytology, cytopathology, immunohema­tology, and genetic pathology and in the diagnostic application of cellular and molecular methodologies in human pathology
• Acquire skills in the diagnostic clinical aspects of repro­ductive medicine and in the laboratory of medicine of the sea and sports activities
• Acquire skills in the study of cellular pathology in the elds of oncology, immunology, and immunopathology, and genetic, ultrastructural, and molecular pathology
• Acquire theoretical, scientic, and professional knowl­edge for laboratory diagnostics on human samples related to the problems of hygiene and preventive medicine, con­trol and prevention of human health in relation to the envi­ronment, occupational medicine, community medicine, forensic medicine, thermal medicine, and space medicine
• Develop theoretical, scientic, and professional knowl­edge in the study of biological and biochemical parame­ters in biological samples as well as in vivo, also in relation to the pathophysiological states and clinical bio­chemistry of nutrition and motor activities, at different levels of structural organization, from single molecules to cells, tissues, and organs, up to the whole organism, both in humans and in animals
• Acquire the necessary skills to study the indicators of alterations underlying hereditary and acquired genetic diseases
• Acquire the necessary skills for the development, use, and quality control of (1) clinical molecular biology, molecu­lar diagnostics, and recombinant biotechnology method­ologies, including for the diagnosis and assessment of disease susceptibility; (2) instrumental technologies, including automated ones, which allow a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the above parameters at high levels of sensitivity and specicity; and (3) biochemical molec­ular technologies linked to human and/or veterinary clini­cal diagnostics and to environmental diagnostics relating to xenobiotics, residues, and additives, including in food.
The professional prole of a laboratory technician is well-
dened by law in Italiandecree number 745 of September 26, 1994 (and subsequent law number 42 of February 26, 1999, and law number 251 of August 10, 2000), which has as its objective the “regulation concerning the identication of the gure and the relative professional prole of the biomed­ical laboratory technician.” Specically, a laboratory techni­cian is a professional gure in the health sector in possession of a qualifying university diploma, with duties aimed at anal­ysis and research related to biomedical and biotechnological
analysis, in particular biochemistry, microbiology and virol­ogy, drug toxicology, immunology, clinical pathology, hema­tology, cytology, and histopathology. Genetics and molecular biology have obviously been recently added to these disci­plines. The activities are carried out (in public and private facilities, authorized according to the current regulations) in technical and professional autonomy, in direct collaboration with the laboratory manager in charge of the various opera­tional responsibilities. A laboratory technician is also respon­sible for the correct fulllment of the analytical procedures and his/her own work within the scope of the functions in the application of the work protocols dened by the responsible managers. He/she also:
• Veries the correspondence of the services provided to the indicators and the standards predened by the head of the structure
• Checks and veries the correct functioning of the equip­ment used
• Provides for routine maintenance and the possible elimi­nation of minor inconveniences
• Participates in the planning and organization of work
• Contributes to the training of support staff and directly contributes to updating their professional prole and research
In his/her activity, a laboratory technician must be able to
autonomously assume responsibility for processes and deci­sions to implement interdisciplinary and interprofessional work in the complex care contexts in which the user expresses his/her health needs. In addition to specic professional skills, the gure of a laboratory technician is equipped with transversal skills, not specic to particular roles but related to knowing how to act in different situations. Law number 43 of February 1, 2006, regarding provisions on health profes­sions, states that as a result of the new university curricula, the graduate staff belonging to health professions are classi­ed into four categories, which contemplate the functions of health-care coordination, specialist coordination, and man­agement, reserved to holders of a specialist degree.
The technical staff is therefore subordinate to the gure of
the technical coordinator, the person in most direct contact with the director of the unit in the organization of laboratory activities. The coordinator coordinates and organizes the professional and economic resources assigned, thus full time carrying out many management tasks within a laboratory in which he/she operates. His/her role is crucial because, through an analysis of the needs of the laboratory, work­loads, and availability of staff, he/she has the task of plan­ning and managing the work, even in the event of unpredictable and unforeseen events (absences, malfunc­tions of technical and/or instrumental aids).
The Role ofStatistics inLaboratory
https://t.me/medicina_free
Medicine
MatteoVidali
4
Introduction
Statistics plays a crucial role in many areas of laboratory medicine, from validation of new methods, to verication of analytical and diagnostic performances, denition of refer­ence intervals, and design and conduction of experiments. The knowledge and the correct application of statistical methods allow to deal with the variability of laboratory data, to organize and synthesize information in order to make objective clinical decisions.
Moreover, methodological errors in quality monitoring, in terms of both data analysis and experimental design of procedures, can determine a serious clinical risk for the patient and an excessive consumption of economic resources. Finally, the introduction of new and complex statistical methods in the clinical laboratory, their increasing diffusion in scientic publications in the eld and their implementa­tion in easily available software packages, have led to con­sider as basic statistical tools those that until a few years ago were advanced statistical techniques.
In this chapter, together with introductory statistical con­cepts, the main statistical methodologies used in the most common scenarios of laboratory medicine are explained. However, these data analysis techniques are not presented as a mere list of tools, but organized into possible experiments in order to make the reader to understand their use and impact and to provide correct and practical solutions to the main problems encountered in the activity of a laboratory.
Basic Statistical Tools
Samples andPopulations
In statistics, population means the nite or innite set of all possible elementary units, homogeneous for a given charac­teristic, to which the statistical investigation refers. Rarely, the experimenter has access to all the units of the population (too costly in terms of money or time, or because the popula­tion is as innite as the innite number of measurements that can be made on a sample under specic conditions). Usually, the experimenter extracts a representative subset (sample) of the population (sampling process), calculates the desired sample statistics, and uses this information to estimate the true parameters of the population (inference process). Our interest is therefore not limited to the sample but to what the latter can tell us about the population. However, the sample estimate is affected by uncertainty (a different sample would have provided a different estimate) and must be interpreted in probabilistic terms.
We can therefore distinguish between descriptive statis­tics, which uses graphical and numerical methods to describe, summarize, and present data, and inferential statistics, which uses the information obtained from the sample to make more general statements that are valid and referable to a broader context than the data from that single experiment.
Descriptive Statistics
M. Vidali (*) Clinical Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Ciaccio (ed.), Clinical and Laboratory Medicine Textbook, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24958-7_4
The statistical analysis of the results of an experiment should always be preceded by their visualization; for this purpose, a valid tool is the histogram which is the graphical representa­tion of the frequency distribution of a quantitative variable. The frequency distribution is obtained by dividing the mea­surement scale into intervals or classes of equal amplitude and counting the number of observations that fall within each class (absolute frequency). The histogram is made up of many
21
22
Frequency Density
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
o
µ
x
N
x
x
N
()
N
s
xx
()
()
()
N
s
xx
()
()
 
 
s
x
https://t.me/medicina_free
0.020
0.010
0.000 140 160 180 200 220
Fig. 4.1 Distribution (relative frequency density) of 300 cholesterol observations, displayed via histogram, frequency polygon, and boxplot
adjacent rectangles whose base is the class and whose height is the frequency. In order to avoid loss of information (when the number of classes is too small), or efciency in the syn­thesis (when the number of classes is high), it is advisable to choose a number of classes between 5 and 20 and of equal amplitude, or the use of formulas such as Sturges’ one k=1+(10/3)log10N, where k and N represent the number of classes and observations, respectively. As an alternative to absolute frequency, it is possible to use relative frequency (ratio of absolute frequency to the total number of observa­tions) or relative frequency density (ratio of relative frequency to class amplitude) (Fig.4.1). Note that in the case of relative frequency density, the area of each bar of the histogram is equal to the relative frequency for that class, so the area of the entire histogram is equal to 1 (sum of all relative frequencies). The histogram makes easy to check how the data are distrib­uted, that is, where the observations are concentrated, the pos­sible presence of extreme observations and/or asymmetry. From the histogram, it is possible to construct the frequency polygon by joining the midpoints of the upper bases of each rectangle and closing the polygon by joining the ends of the line thus obtained with the x-axis (Fig.4.1). The frequency polygon, unlike the histogram, allows us to compare different distributions in the same graph.
Although the frequency distribution is a useful tool to illustrate a quantitative variable, it is sometimes necessary to summarize the data with a few values: position (or central tendency) and dispersion measures are used for this purpose. One must remember the conceptual difference between pop­ulation parameters (denoted by letters of the Greek alphabet), which are generally unobservable but estimable quantities, and estimates of these parameters or statistics (denoted by letters of the Latin alphabet) calculated from sample data. The two most widely used measures of position are the arith­metic mean and the median. The former, calculated as the ratio of the sum of all observations to their number
(
for the population,
i
=
i
for the sample), has
=
M. Vidali
the advantage of synthesis and ease of calculation, but the disadvantage of being inuenced by extreme values. The second one, less dependent on extreme values, represents the value that divides an ordered set of data into two equal parts, so that half of the observations have a value lower than the median and half a value higher than the median; in other words, in an ordered set of observations, the median is the value corresponding to the [(N+1)/2]-th observation (if the number of observations is odd) or the value corresponding to the arithmetic mean of the values of the two central observa­tions (N/2) and [(N/2)+1] (if the number of observations is even).
Measures of dispersion are useful in assessing the vari-
ability of data around their central tendency. The most widely
2
x
µ
i
x
for the population,
2
µ
i
for the population,
used are the variance (
∑−
2
=
2
i
N
for the sample) and its square root, that is,
1
the standard deviation (
∑−
=
2
i
N
for the sample). The advantage of the
1
2
Ã
σ=
=
∑−
∑−
standard deviation, compared to the variance, is that it is expressed in the same units as the observations. Note that in the denominator of the variance and ofthe standard deviation does not appear N but (N 1), that is, the degrees of free­dom. In general, the degrees of freedom (df) are equal to the difference between the number of data and the number of estimated parameters (in the standard deviation, we have N1 degrees of freedom because the mean was estimated). When we want to compare the variability of two or more sets of data, in particular when the observations are expressed with different units or orders of magnitude, it is preferable to use the coefcient of variation, which expresses the standard
deviation as a percentage of the mean %CV
100 .
Other measures often used to summarize a distribution are quantiles. A quantile q is a value such that, in an ordered set, a proportion q of data is less than the value correspond­ing toq and a proportion 1− q of data is greater than the value corresponding to q. In particular, a quantile q in an ordered set is the value corresponding to the observation i=q(N + 1) (if i is not an integer, the quantile is found by interpolation). Particularly useful quantiles are the quartiles (Q) and the percentiles (P) that correspond to those values that divide an ordered set into 4 and 100 parts of equal size, respectively. The median corresponds to the second quartile (Q2) and the 50th percentile (P50). From the denition of quartiles, it is clear that 25% of a data set will have a value lower than Q1 (P25), 25% higher than Q3 (P75), and the
xe
()
σπ
z
x
µ
σ
Z
X
µ
σ
z
2
z
1
z
333
z
667
σ
4 The Role ofStatistics inLaboratory Medicine
https://t.me/medicina_free
remaining 50% will have a value within the interquartile range (Q3-Q1 or IQR). Similarly, the interval between the
2.5 percentile (P2.5) and the 97.5 percentile (P97.5) includes 95% of the observations: in fact, 2.5% of the observations will be lower than P2.5, 95% between P2.5 and P97.5 and the remaining 2.5 will be greater than P97.5. The combina­tion of ve numbers, Q1, Q2, Q3, min, and max, is a conve­nient and often used way in the literature to summarize a distribution. This information can be visualized in the box and whisker plot or boxplot, in which the box, bisected by the median Q2, has Q1 and Q3 as its ends, with whiskers extending from Q1 and Q3, respectively, to the minimum and maximum values equal to or less than 1.5 times the IQR interval. The extreme observations, not reached by the whis­kers, are represented as points (Fig.4.1).
Probability Distributions andtheNormal Distribution
As the sample size (N) increases, the class size (A) of the histogram may be decreased; in general, as N tends to inn­ity, A tends to zero and the histogram (or frequency polygon) is approximated by a smooth curve. When N tends to popula­tion size (i.e., with N very large), this smooth curve becomes the relative frequency density of the population. Just as the total area of the histogram is equal to 1, the area under the curve is also equal to 1. The proportion of observations that falls between two xed limits is equal to the area under the curve between those two limits. Thus, since the probability of a randomly chosen observation falling between two limits is equal to the proportion of observations falling between these two limits, the population frequency distribution is called the probability distribution or probability density function.
The most common probability distribution in statistics is
the normal or Gaussian distribution (or bell curve) (Fig.4.2).
2
z
2
Its probability density has equation: f
()
1
=
2
with
=
.
The Gaussian distribution is completely dened by mean and standard deviation. It is a symmetrical distribution in which the mean, median, and mode (most frequent value) coincide. This distribution is particularly important for at least two reasons: many biological variables of interest to the laboratory, including measurement errors, are approximately normally distributed and, in addition, many statistical meth­ods are based on the assumption of normal distribution of the data. Knowing that a variable is normally distributed and knowing the mean and standard deviation, we can know the probability that a randomly selected individual will exhibit a value greater than, less than, or within 2 xed limits. For
/
µ–3σ µ–2σ µ–1σ µµ+1σ µ+2σ µ+3σ
µ±1σ = 68.2%
µ±2σ = 95.4%
µ±3
= 99.7%
Fig. 4.2 Gaussian probability distribution
example, knowing that the variable glycemia has μ=90mg/ dl and σ=15mg/dl, we might want to know the probability that a randomly selected individual has a glucose level greater than 120, or less than 75, or between 85 and 100mg/ dl. To answer this question, we must determine the propor­tion of the area under the curve to the right of x1=120, or to the left of x2=75, or between x3=85 and x4=100 mg/dl, respectively. These areas have been calculated and tabulated and can be found in statistical texts, literature, or statistical software. However, it would not be possible to tabulate val­ues for all the innite normal curves given by the combina­tion of the different means and standard deviations. In fact, only one particular curve was tabulated, called the standard­ized normal distribution, with μ=0 and σ= 1. To use the tabulated area table in order to estimate the probability asso­ciated with a normal variable X, it is necessary to transform the normal variable X into a standardized normal variable Z
with the operation
look for the relative probability value in the table. In our
example,
85 90
=
3
15
=− . ;
0
=
1
=
120 90
15
100 90
=
4
(standardization) and then
= ;
= . . The area under
15
0
2
75 90
=
15
the curve to the right of z=2 is equal to 0.023; to the left of z=1 is 0.159; included between z=0.333 and z=0.667
is 0.378; this means that the probability that a subject ran­domly selected from this population presents a glycemia value higher than 120 P(X>120), or lower than 75 P(X<75), or included between 85 and 100mg/dl P(85 <X<100) is, respectively, equal to 2.3%, 15.9%, and 37.8% (Fig.4.3). It is easy to verify that in a Gaussian distribution 68.4% of the
23
=− ;
24
–3 –2 –1 0 +0.67 +1 +2 +3–0.33
µ = 90
Theoretical quantiles
Observed quantiles
()
λ
λλ
10
/ n
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Vidali
σ = 15
45 60 75 90 100 105 120 13585
µ
X
i
Z =
σ
µ = 0 σ = 1
Fig. 4.3 Standardization procedure: from normal curve to standard­ized normal curve with mean=0 and standard deviation=1
area under the curve is between mean ±1 standard deviation (in the standardized normal between z=1 and z=1), 95.4% between mean ±2 standard deviations (between z=2 and z = 2), and 99.7% between mean ±3 standard deviations (between z=3 and z=3) (Figs.4.2 and 4.3).
Since many statistical methods can only be used if the observations are normally distributed, it is necessary to ver­ify this assumption. Graphical and formal statistical methods can be used for this purpose. The visualization of the data through histogram and boxplot and the comparison of the position indices (mean and median) allow to easily verify the presence of deviations from normality: since, in fact, the mean is affected by extreme values, in distributions with positive asymmetry (right long tail), the mean will be higher than the median, and, in distributions with negative asym­metry (left long tail), the mean will be lower than the median. A reliable tool, also for small samples, is represented by the normal probability plot, a graphical method in which the observed quantiles (y-axis) are graphed toward the theoreti­cal quantiles (x-axis). The presence of pronounced devia­tions from the theoretical quantile-quantile line suggests the
200
180
160
140
–2 –1 012
Fig. 4.4 Normal probability plot to verify the normal distribution of the data. The points are well aligned along the theoretical line that passes through the rst and third quartiles. The graph shows only a slight curvature to the left (bottom of the curve) with a point identied as aberrant by Horn’s method
assumption of non-normality in the data (Fig. 4.4). The assumption of normality can also be veried with formal sta­tistical tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Anderson-Darling test, and the more popular Shapiro-Wilk test (not usable, however, for large samples).
In the presence of signicant deviations, it is possible to attempt mathematical transformations of the data in order to proceed subsequently to a new normality check. Several transformations can be applied to the data (including loga­rithm, reciprocal, square root, power-elevation), and it is often necessary to proceed by trial and error. Instead of using arbitrarily chosen transformations, it is possible to use the transformation proposed by Box and Cox, a technique that allows to determine which is the best transformation to apply to the variable y. The transformation is dened by
y
=
log,ifif
/,
y
()
Where W is the transformed
=
λ
0
variable, y the original variable, and λ the parameter dening the transformation estimated using the maximum likelihood criterion.
Inferential Statistics: Condence Intervals andHypothesis Tests
Imagine extracting all possible samples of size n from the population and calculating the mean of each of them. The distribution of all possible averages is called the sampling distribution of the mean. More generally, we speak of sam­pling distributions to denote the distribution of the values of different statistics computed over all possible samples.
The sampling distribution of the mean will have its own mean and standard deviation. It can be shown that: (1) the mean of the sampling distribution (i.e., the mean of the aver­ages) is equal to the population mean μ; (2) the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean, or stan­dard error (es), is equal to
; (3) if n is sufciently large,
µµ
−<<+
61
./ÃÃnx n
x
i
µσ
±
./n
x n±
./
σ
x n±
./
σ
x n
./
σ
x n+
./
σ
/ n
zn
/
xs
//
xs
//
x
sn
µ
x tsn
n±−
α
.;
rse×k
4 The Role ofStatistics inLaboratory Medicine
https://t.me/medicina_free
25
the sampling distribution is approximately normal (the more the population deviates from normality, the larger n must be).
Condence Intervals
Just as 95% of the observations in a normal distribution are within ±2 standard deviations (more precisely 1.96 sd) from the mean (Fig.4.2), so, if n is sufciently large, 95% of the averages in the sampling distribution of the mean are within ±1.96 standard errors from μ (i.e., x
19
there is a 95% probability that the average sample is within the range is equivalent to saying that μ is within the range
96./
), which means that
of a particular
196
); this, conversely,
196
or that there is a 95% probability that the limits of the inter­val delimited by
196
contain the true population mean μ. This interval is called the 95% condence interval, and the extremes of the interval
196
are called the 95% condence limits. In real
196
and
life, we do not have all possible samples of size n extracted from a population, and σ is unknown; however, if n is suf­ciently large (n>60), not only does the sampling distribution approximate well to a normal distribution but s (the sample standard deviation) is a good estimate of σ (the unknown standard deviation of the population) and good estimate of
. This result allows us to associate a
/ is a
statistics calculated on a sample (point estimate) with an interval in which we have some level of condence that it contains the true population parameter (interval estimate). The condence interval ±
σ
increases as the selected condence level increases (z=1.64 for 90%, z = 1.96 for 95%, z = 2.58 for 99%) and decreases as n increases (the estimate becomes less uncertain). With small samples (n<60), s may not be a reliable estimate of σ, because s can vary greatly from sample to sample, and the ratio
2
µ
n
does not follow a standardized normal dis­tribution. However, for small samples, it can be shown, that if the observations come from a normal distribution, the ratio
2
µ
n
follows a Student’s t distribution with (n 1) degrees of freedom. The t distribution is atter and has thicker tails than the normal distribution. It is actually a family of distributions whose shape depends on the number of degrees of freedom. In general, for the same proportion of observations under the curve or the same probability, t has a larger value than z, resulting in wider condence intervals and hence greater uncertainty in the estimate. As n, and hence degrees of freedom, increase, t tends to z.
Hypothesis Testing
A second type of inference is represented by statistical hypothesis testing. Hypothesis testing checks the validity of a hypothesis and involves rst formulating a hypothesis rela­tive to a characteristic of the population and then evaluating the probability of obtaining the observed sample (and there­fore the statistics calculated on the sample) if the hypothesis
is true. The hypothesis to be tested is called null hypothesis and is indicated with H0, while the alternative hypothesis, complementary to the null hypothesis, is indicated with H1. Since hypothesis testing is a procedure based on probability, two errors may occur: an error of the rst type, or alpha error (α), which is the one committed if we reject H0 when it is true, and an error of the second type, or beta error (β), which is committed if we accept H0 when it is false.
In general, we proceed as follows: (1) we x H0 and H1; (2) we calculate the desired sample statistic and the value of the statistical test; (3) using the tables of the appropriate distribu­tion, we calculate the probability p of obtaining a statistic like the observed one, or more extreme, under the hypothesis that H0 is true; (4) we compare p with α (xed in general equal to
0.05): if p is less than α, we consider the test statistically signi­cant and reject the null hypothesis (the null hypothesis is not consistent with the observed results) otherwise we accept it.
Example: To test the hypothesis that smoking affects blood pressure, we design a study in which the mean blood pressure of 20 heavy smokers is measured. The working hypothesis or alternative H1 is “heavy smokers have a differ­ent mean blood pressure than the non-smoking population,” while the null hypothesis H0 is “heavy smokers have the same mean blood pressure as the non-smoking population.” The value of the mean arterial pressure of the population (obtained from previous studies) is μ= 148 mmHg; we set α=0.05; H0:μ=148mmHg; H1:μ148mmHg; the sample of subjects studied (n=20) has mean x=152mmHg and standard deviation s=8mmHg; we calculate the value of the
statistical test that in this case is
=
n
1
152 148
=
//
820
=
.
224
; using the distribution t (non-large sample) with (n−1=19) degrees of freedom, we look for the probability value corre­sponding to t
= 2.24, which is p = 0.037. This means
α/2;n1
that, if the null hypothesis is true (μ=148mmHg), the prob­ability of obtaining by chance a result like the observed (x=152mmHg), or even more extreme, is 3.7%. Therefore, since p<α, we have sufcient evidence to reject H0 and con­clude that the mean arterial pressure of smokers is different from the pressure of non-smokers. With the data from the previous example, we can also calculate the 95% condence interval of the mean:
152 820 152 2 093 179 148 3 155 7
±× =± ×= −t
0 025 19
.;
/...
/;/21
, that is,
conrming what previously concluded, the condence inter­val does not contain the value 148mmHg (we are 95% con­dent that the observed sample does not come from the population with mean μ=148mmHg).
In general, from a sample statistic (a mean, a difference between means, or some other estimator), it is possible to con­struct a condence interval and to calculate the test statistic:
5%CI Estimatedparamete
26
T
rse=
with
=≠
d
HH
δ
µδ
::
0121
00
s
2
s
2
2
F ss=
222
s s
2
>
±+
µµ
()
()
ns
22
11
s
1
s
2
2
pp
22
11
()
z
pp
nn
()
−−
12
12
11
()
ππ
np np
nn
+
22
12
()
=
=
i
xx
2
∑−
()
=mj
()
=mj
2
within
within
F F>
within between
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Vidali
estEstimated paramete
/
with the standard error (se) calculated in different ways depending on the estimator and k depending on the distribu­tion considered. Let us see some examples (z can substitute t for large n), where the statistical test,calculations for CI and the specic statistics are reported, together with H0 and H1:
1. Test for two paired samples (e.g., subjects measured before and after a treatment): t-test for paired samples with (n1) degrees of freedom, where n is the number of pairs of observations
CI
=
dt sn t
α
=−
δµ
n
/;
21
d
/;
sn
d
and
/
with d e sd mean and standard deviation of the differ­ences, respectively, and δ the true difference between population means
2. Test for two independent samples (n1 and n2): Student’s t-test with (n1+n2 2) degrees of freedom
(a) With variances
and
1
equal (hypothesis of homo­geneity or homoscedasticity of variances veriable by tests for variance
/ with
1
122
and F fol­lowing a Fisher distribution with (n1–1) and (n2–1) degrees of freedom (other tests that can be used for the same purpose are Bartlett’s test and Levene’s test):
2
p
with
.
11
nn
12
H
01 2
:
=
2
2
CI
=−
xx ts
()
xx
()
t
=
−−
12 12
11
//
sn
p
1
and
H
+−
nn12 22
α
/;
12
µµ
()
nn
+
2
:
µµ
11 2
where μ1 andμ2 are the population means and s
is the common or pooled variance: s
2
nn
12
+−
+−
2
2
e
non-homogeneous (heterosce-
ns
11
=
(b) With variances
dasticity): other tests must be used (e.g., Welch test)
3. Test for two proportions (p1 and p2 calculated in two sam­ples of size n1 and n2): test z
(( )(
CI =−
pp z
()
±
12 2
α
/
pp
11
n
1
+
;
n
2
4. Tests for three or more independent samples: ANOVA test or analysis of variance
The null hypothesis H0 in this case is that the samples are from the same population (same means). One approach would be to perform as many two-way comparisons with as many Student’s t-tests. However, with m groups, the possible two-way comparisons are m(m1)/2 and, as the number of groups, and hence comparisons, increases, the probability that at least one comparison is statistically signicant increases even if H0 is true (i.e.greater probability of com­mitting a Type I error: if for one comparison the probability of not rejecting H0, when true, is 0.95, for k comparisons it is (0.95)k and so the probability of rejecting H0 in at least one comparison, if H0 is true, is 1–0.95k; for example, if m=5 groups, k =10 comparisons and the probability of rejecting H0, when true, in at least one comparison is 1–0.9510=0.40 much larger than α xed).
The ANOVA test instead of considering averages consid­ers variances. It is in fact based on the reasoning that when dealing with several populations (e.g., different treatments), the total variability depends on the variability of individual values with respect to the mean of their population, or within­group variance (due to measurement error, individual char­acteristics, or uncontrollable factors), and on the variability of their population averages with respect to the overall mean, or between-group variance. If the variability within popula­tions (within-group variance) is small compared to the vari­ability between population averages (between-group variance), we conclude that the averages are different. With m groups, we proceed in this way by calculating:
1
• Deviance within groups:
n11 degrees of freedom, which measures the vari-
j
S
within
1
=∑∑−
mjn
ij j
j
, with
ability of the data around the group mean
p
• Deviance between groups:
p
(m1) degrees of freedom, which measures the variabil-
S
between
1
=∑
nx x
jj
ity of group averages around the overall mean
• Total failure: SS
df
total
=df
within
+df
• Variance within groups: MS
• Variance between groups: MS
total
between
 = SS
within
within
between
 + SS
SS
=
df
=
within
SS
df
between
between
between
, with
, with
12
=
pp
(
1
()
H0:π1=π2 and H1:π1π2, whereπ1 andπ2 are the popu-
lation proportions, assuming that, n1p, n1(1-p), n2p and n2(1-p)are all 5.
with p
+
MS
11
=
,
+
• Fisher’s test: F=
if
α
;;df df
between
MS
, then p<α and we reject H0: at least one of the m groups is signicantly differenttinct from the others. A signicant F-test indicates that not all averages are equal but does not allow us to know which and how many are dif-
αα
==
()
12
n
i
()
()
=
1
xx
ini
∑−
()
=
s
xx
i
()
=∑1
n
()
y
i
b
b
()
yy
ii
()
yi
yy
ii
()
r
xxyy
∑−
()
()
∑−
()
()
==
4 The Role ofStatistics inLaboratory Medicine
https://t.me/medicina_free
27
ferent from each other. To answer this question, we need to run tests for multiple comparisons, that is, comparisons for each pair of averages. To avoid, as shown before, that increas­ing the number of comparisons leads to an increase in the probability of committing a type I error, various approaches or various corrections can be used. For example, Bonferroni’s correction suggests xing the type I error by calculating a
modied α as
numberofcomparisons mm
,
/
where m is the number of groups. The main drawback of the Bonferroni correction is the decrease in statistical power as the number of comparisons increases (i.e., the probability of rejecting H0,when it is false, decreases). Several other tests for multiple comparisons are described in the literature including the Student-Newman-Keuls test, Tukey’s method, and the Holm-Bonferroni method.
Like the t-test, two assumptions must be met for the ANOVA test: (1) the variable is normally distributed; (2) the variances of the groups are equal (homoscedasticity). Both assumptions can be veried through graphical methods (his­togram, normal probability plot, scatter plot) and formal sta­tistical methods (Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and Levene’s test for homoscedasticity). While moderate deviations from normality can be ignored (especially for groups of equal numerosity), non-homogeneity of variances can greatly inu­ence the results. In the presence of violations of these assump­tions, it is advisable to try a mathematical transformation (which can both normalize the distribution and make the vari­ance similar across groups) or to use non- parametric meth­ods, that is, methods that do not depend on the shape of the distribution and do not involve the estimation of statistical parameters: the Mann-Whitney test for two independent sam­ples, the Wilcoxon test for two paired samples, and the Kruskal-Wallis test for three or more samples. Although non­parametric tests do not require the assumptions underlying parametric tests, it should be remembered that, if these assumptions are met, non-parametric tests have less statistical power.
Correlation andLinear Regression
Sometimes we are interested in evaluating the relationship between two quantitative variables. In this situation, it is nec­essary to initially display the data in a scatter plot, that is, a dot plot whose coordinates are represented by the two vari­ables being studied. Linear regression allows us to estimate the mathematical relationship between an independent vari­able (x-axis) and a dependent variable (y-axis). Correlation, on the other hand, allows us to estimate the strength of the association between the two variables.
The regression provides the equation of the line that best describes the dependent variable as a function of the inde­pendent variable: Y=a+bX+E, where a and b are, respec-
tively, the intercept and the slope coefcient (or regression coefcient) of the line and E is the error, that is, the part of the variability of Y not explained by the line. The parameters of the line are estimated through the method of least squares, that is, looking for the values of the parameters that mini­mize the sum of the squares of the vertical distances of the points from the line. The following formulas are used:
=
n
()
xxyy
ii
i
=
1
xx
i
aybx
=−
;
2
The parameters can then also be used to make predictions
by the equation of the line.
As with other estimators, we can calculate condence
intervals and conduct hypothesis tests for a and b.
The condence intervals are as follows:
2
for a: CI=a± t
for b: CI=b±t
∑−
inii
with
s
=1
=
α/2; n−2
α/2; n2
yy
SE(a) with
SE(b) with
2
, where
2
E as
()
E( )b
1
=+
n
=
are the corresponding
x
1
n
i
2
2
values of yi predicted by the regression line. The degrees of freedom are (n2) because we estimated two parameters a and b.
It is also possible to test the null hypothesis that the popu­lation regression coefcient is 0, that is, that there is no linear relationship between X and Y.
So for H0:β=0 we have
=
SE
.
The use of the least squares method and the t distribution for hypothesis testing and condence intervals are based on
the assumption that the residuals
are normally dis­tributed and have equal variance. These assumptions can be veried by a normal probability plot of the residuals andbygraphing the predicted values
. Analysis of the residuals can also reveal extreme
toward the residuals
points that are highly inuential on the regression line.
Instead, the strength of the association between two quan­titative variables is expressed by the linear correlation coef­cient r estimated by:
inii
=
=
()
1
2
xx yy
∑−
()
inii
1
n
1
2
i
The coefcient r ranges from 1 (perfect association, as one variable increases, the other decreases) to +1 (perfect association, as one variable increases, the other also increases). If r=0, there is no relationship between the vari­ables. The correlation coefcient measures the strength of