Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3608_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
83 Мб
Скачать
Vasculitides
GIANT CELL ARTERITIS
Giant cell (temporal) arteritis (GCA; see Chapter 43) is a medium-vessel chronic inflammatory vasculitis that affects the aorta and its branch vessels. It most commonly occurs in patients older than 55 years of age and is twice as common in women as men. rysms, most commonly in the thoracic aorta. patients with GCA-related TAAs, 16 developed aortic dissection, 15 had valvular annular expansion causing symptomatic aortic valve insufficiency, and 18 required surgery. patients with GCA, 18% developed aortic aneurysm or dissection, and these occurrences were inversely associated with develop­ment of intracranial disease manifestations. aortic aneurysm itself was not associated with increased mortal­ity; however, the nine individuals who developed aortic dissec­tion had significantly increased mortality. aneurysm formation seems to be similar to patients without GCA, with increases in MMP-2- and MMP-9-associated destruction of the vessel wall.
TAKAYASU'S ARTERITIS
Named for a Japanese professor of ophthalmology, Takayasu's arteritis (TA; see Chapter 42) is a large-vessel vasculitis that typi­cally has its onset between the age of 10 and 30 years. The most common vascular presentation is occlusive disease, found in 80% to 94% of patients; however, aortic aneurysms may be found in up to one fourth of patients with TA. disease has been associated with worse outcome in a series of 120 Japanese patients followed for 13 years. and MMP-9 are elevated in TA, but the mechanism of aneurysm formation remains unknown.
BEHÇET'S DISEASE
Behçet's disease (see Chapter 41) is a small-vessel vasculitis originally characterized by a set of three symptoms: aphthous stomatitis, genital ulcers, and uveitis. sized and large arteries, as well as veins, arises not from direct vascular inflammation but rather due to vasculitis of the small arteries of the vasa vasorum that supply the vessel wall. Vascular involvement, including aneurysms, can be found in 7% to 38% of patients. in Behçet's disease depends in large part on the location of the abnormality and clinical circumstances. First-line therapy includes an antiinflammatory regimen with corticosteroids. As with other vasculitides, risk of intervention is greatest during the state of active inflammation, and there is an increased risk of rupture, dissection, and/or future aneurysmal dilation at the site of revascularization.
SERONEGATIVE SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES
The spondyloarthropathies (see Chapter 41) are characterized by inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints, association with HLA-B27, and absence of rheumatoid factor (RF). These disorders are known to be associated with an increased risk of aortic aneurysm formation. Specific spondyloarthropathies include ankylosing spondylitis, Reiter's syndrome, and relaps­ing polychondritis.
presence of four of the five following features: onset younger than 40 years of age, back pain for more than 3 months, insidi­ous onset of symptoms, morning stiffness, and improvement with exercise. Aortic root and valve disease is present in up to 80% of patients. valve disease were found in 82%; thickening of the aortic valve was noted in 41% of patients, and aortic dilation in 25%.
233
Between 1% and 20% of GCA patients develop aneu-
237,238
239,240
Development of aneurysmal
242
243
243,245
Management of aneurysmal disease
234
In a series of 41
235
In a series of 168
234
Presence of an
236
The mechanism of
241
Blood levels of MMP-2
Involvement of medium-
244
Ankylosing spondylitis is an HLA-B27 disease that requires the
242
In a series of 44 outpatients, aortic root disease and
246
Aortic
valve thickening manifested as nodularities of the aortic cusps, forming a characteristic subaortic bump.
242
Valve regurgitation was seen in almost half of patients, and 40% had moderate lesions.
Reiter's syndrome is a reactive arthritis that affects the lower limbs, causing an asymmetrical oligoarthritis. To make the diagno­sis, patients must have evidence of a preceding infection, diarrhea, or urethritis 4 weeks preceding the syndrome.
247
Less than 1% of Reiter's syndrome patients develop cardiovascular complications. Among this group, aortic insufficiency is a late finding.
Relapsing polychondritis is a paroxysmal and progressive inflammatory disease of the cartilaginous structures, affecting the ear, nose, and hyaline cartilage of the tracheobronchial tree. Cardiovascular disease, including aortic aneurysms, is found in 25% to 50% of patients.
248
Infectious Aortic Aneurysms
MYCOTIC ANEURYSMS
Also known as infective endarteritis aneurysms are rare phenomena. Two large necropsy studies including 22,000 and 20,000 patients, respectively, revealed a combined incidence of 0.03% in the United States. average age of patients with mycotic aneurysms is 65, and men are threefold more likely to develop mycotic aneurysms than women.
251,252
Hematogenous seeding, such as occurs in patients with endocarditis, affects a vessel that may be “at risk” because of preexisting atherosclerosis or previous damage and represents the most common cause of mycotic aneurysms. Indeed, as many as 15% of patients with endocarditis developed mycotic aneurysm before the antibiotic era. include septic microemboli, contiguous extension, and trauma with direct contamination. In contrast to the typical degener­ative or vasculitic fusiform expansion, mycotic aneurysms are more likely to be saccular (see range in size from 1 mm to 10 cm and include components of acute and chronic inflammation, hemorrhage, abscess forma­tion, and necrosis.
Clinical manifestations of mycotic aneurysm most commonly include pain and fever and, if related to a new aneurysm, should prompt directed investigation. The organisms that most commonly cause mycotic aneurysms include Staphylococcus and Salmonella species, which cause 40% and 20% of mycotic aneurysms, respec-
255,256
tively. to 80%.
Surgery should be prompt, since rupture occurs in up
257,258
Prognosis for cerebral vascular infection is dire, with 1-year mortality for patients who have cerebrovascular mycotic aneurysms reaching as high as 90%.
TUBERCULOUS ANEURYSMS
Aortic aneurysm due to tuberculosis is quite rare. In a series of more than 22,000 autopsies performed at one urban medical center in the first half of the 20th century, only 1 of 308 aortic aneurysms had tuberculous aneurysms, no tuberculous aneurysms among 20,000 autopsies performed in a rural setting.
250
Three mechanisms have been postulated to facilitate tuberculous adhesion and endarteritis. It is thought that direct extension from a contiguous source, such as the spine or lung, may cause 75% of tuberculous aneurysms. ties include adhesion to a vessel damaged by atherosclerosis or infiltration of the inner layers of the aorta via the vasa vasorum. The abdominal and thoracic portions of the aorta are affected similarly. The presentation of the patient with a tuberculous aneurysm varies significantly. The patient may be asymptom­atic, have a palpable or radiologically visible paraaortic mass, complain of chest or abdominal pain, or present with aortic rup­ture and hypovolemic shock. Tuberculous aneurysms that are symptomatic or rapidly expanding and pseudoaneurysms typi­cally require surgical repair.
(see Chapter 59), mycotic
254
Other etiologies
Fig. 37-4). The outpouching may
258
249
whereas there were
259
Other possibili-
249,250
The
253
259
465
CH 37
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PROGNOSIS OF AORTIC ANEURYSMS
466
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
SYPHILITIC ANEURYSMS
Although syphilis may once have been a common cause of aor­tic disease, antibiotics have greatly diminished the incidence of syphilitic aortic aneurysm (luetic aneurysm), such that fewer than 50 cases have been reported in the antibiotic era.
CH
vous system (CNS) and cardiovascular complications denote the
37
tertiary stage of syphilis. Classically, this arises after a latent phase
260
of roughly 10 to 30 years from initial spirochete infection. Syphilitic aortitis may occur in up to 10% of patients with tertiary syphilis (
Fig. 37-6). Destruction of the elastic lamina occurs as a conse-
quence of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate around the vasa vasorum, owing to direct spirochete infection of the aortic media. This ulti­mately leads to expansion but also fibrosis and calcification, pro­ducing the classic “tree bark” radiographic pattern. Luetic aortic aneurysms commonly involve the ascending aorta and are saccu­lar. Involvement of the coronary ostia may result in coronary steno­sis and resultant anginal symptoms. Survival with syphilitic aortic aneurysm is worse than the general population.
Trauma
Aneurysms related to trauma are discussed in Chapter 61.
FIGURE 376 Volume-rendered (VR) maximum intensity projections (MIPs) from computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of chest of patient with tertiary syphilis, showing extensively calcified thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) measuring 11.5 cm × 11.4 cm in short axis and 18 cm in length. (From Tomey MI, Murthy VL, Beckman JA: Giant syphilitic aortic
aneurysm: a case report and review of the literature. Vasc Med 16:360–364, 2011.)
REFERENCES
1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update:
a report from the American Heart Association, Circulation 123(4):e18–e209, 2011.
2. Wolinsky H, Glagov S: A lamellar unit of aortic medial structure and function in mammals,
Circ Res 20(1):99–111, 1967.
3. Wassef M, Baxter BT, Chisholm RL, et al: Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms:
a multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, J Vasc Surg 34(4):730–738, 2001.
Central ner-
4. Hoshina K, Sho E, Sho M, et al: Wall shear stress and strain modulate experimental aneurysm cellularity, J Vasc Surg 37(5):1067–1074, 2003.
5. Golledge J, Norman PE: Atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm: cause, response, or common risk factors? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30(6):1075–1077, 2010.
6. Johnsen SH, Forsdahl SH, Singh K, et al: Atherosclerosis in abdominal aortic aneurysms: a causal event or a process running in parallel? The Tromso study, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30(6):1263–1268, 2010.
7. Halpern VJ, Nackman GB, Gandhi RH, et al: The elastase infusion model of experimental aortic aneurysms: synchrony of induction of endogenous proteinases with matrix destruction and inflammatory cell response, J Vasc Surg 20(1):51–60, 1994.
8. Baxter BT, Davis VA, Minion DJ, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysms are associated with altered matrix proteins of the nonaneurysmal aortic segments, J Vasc Surg 19(5):797–802, 1994 discussion 803.
9. Dobrin PB, Mrkvicka R: Failure of elastin or collagen as possible critical connective tissue alterations underlying aneurysmal dilatation, Cardiovasc Surg 2(4):484–488, 1994.
10. Groenink M, Langerak SE, Vanbavel E, et al: The influence of aging and aortic stiffness on permanent dilation and breaking stress of the thoracic descending aorta, Cardiovasc Res 43(2):471–480, 1999.
11. Movat HZ, More RH, Haust MD: The diffuse intimal thickening of the human aorta with aging, Am J Pathol 34(6):1023–1031, 1958.
12. Kawasaki T, Sasayama S, Yagi S, et al: Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries, Cardiovasc Res 21(9):678–687, 1987.
13. Breithaupt-Grogler K, Belz GG: Epidemiology of the arterial stiffness, Pathol Biol (Paris) 47(6):604–613, 1999.
14. Lakatta EG: Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part III: cellular and molecular clues to heart and arterial aging, Circulation 107(3):490–497, 2003.
15. Lin AE, Lippe BM, Geffner ME, et al: Aortic dilation, dissection, and rupture in patients with Turner syndrome, J Pediatr 109(5):820–826, 1986.
16. Nataatmadja M, West M, West J, et al: Abnormal extracellular matrix protein transport associated with increased apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in Marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve thoracic aortic aneurysm, Circulation 108(Suppl 1):II329–II334, 2003.
17. Zhang J, Schmidt J, Ryschich E, et al: Increased apoptosis and decreased density of medial smooth muscle cells in human abdominal aortic aneurysms, Chin Med J (Engl) 116(10):1549–1552, 2003.
18. Visse R, Nagase H: Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry, Circ Res 92(8):827–839, 2003.
19. Louwrens HD, Kwaan HC, Pearce WH, et al: Plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor expression by normal and aneurysmal human aortic smooth muscle cells in culture, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10(3):289–293, 1995.
20. Allaire E, Hasenstab D, Kenagy RD, et al: Prevention of aneurysm development and rupture by local overexpression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, Circulation 98(3):249–255,
1998.
21. Reilly JM, Sicard GA, Lucore CL: Abnormal expression of plasminogen activators in aortic aneurysmal and occlusive disease, J Vasc Surg 19(5):865–872, 1994.
22. Vine N, Powell JT: Metalloproteinases in degenerative aortic disease, Clin Sci (Lond) 81(2):233–239, 1991.
23. Brophy CM, Marks WH, Reilly JM, et al: Decreased tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) in abdominal aortic aneurysm tissue: a preliminary report, J Surg Res 50(6): 653–657, 1991.
24. Herron GS, Unemori E, Wong M, et al: Connective tissue proteinases and inhibitors in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Involvement of the vasa vasorum in the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysms, Arterioscler Thromb 11(6):1667–1677, 1991.
25. Newman KM, Malon AM, Shin RD, et al: Matrix metalloproteinases in abdominal aortic aneurysm: characterization, purification, and their possible sources, Connect Tissue Res 30(4):265–276, 1994.
26. Newman KM, Ogata Y, Malon AM, et al: Identification of matrix metalloproteinases 3 (stromelysin-1) and 9 (gelatinase B) in abdominal aortic aneurysm, Arterioscler Thromb 14(8):1315–1320, 1994.
27. Newman KM, Jean-Claude J, Li H, et al: Cellular localization of matrix metalloproteinases in the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall, J Vasc Surg 20(5):814–820, 1994.
28. Patel MI, Melrose J, Ghosh P, et al: Increased synthesis of matrix metalloproteinases by aortic smooth muscle cells is implicated in the etiopathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg 24(1):82–92, 1996.
29. Thompson RW, Holmes DR, Mertens RA, et al: Production and localization of 92-kilodalton gelatinase in abdominal aortic aneurysms. An elastolytic metalloproteinase expressed by aneurysm-infiltrating macrophages, J Clin Invest 96(1):318–326, 1995.
30. Davis V, Persidskaia R, Baca-Regen L, et al: Matrix metalloproteinase-2 production and its binding to the matrix are increased in abdominal aortic aneurysms, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 18(10):1625–1633, 1998.
31. McMillan WD, Patterson BK, Keen RR, et al: In situ localization and quantification of seventy-two-kilodalton type IV collagenase in aneurysmal, occlusive, and normal aorta, J Vasc Surg 22(3):295–305, 1995.
32. Goodall S, Crowther M, Hemingway DM, et al: Ubiquitous elevation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression in the vasculature of patients with abdominal aneurysms, Circulation 104(3):304–309, 2001.
33. Longo GM, Xiong W, Greiner TC, et al: Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 work in concert to produce aortic aneurysms, J Clin Invest 110(5):625–632, 2002.
34. Wilson WR, Anderton M, Choke EC, et al: Elevated plasma MMP1 and MMP9 are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35(5):580–584, 2008.
35. Wilson WR, Anderton M, Schwalbe EC, et al: Matrix metalloproteinase-8 and -9 are increased at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture, Circulation 113(3):438–445,
2006.
36. Petersen E, Wagberg F, Angquist KA: Proteolysis of the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall and the association with rupture, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 23(2):153–157, 2002.
37. Nishimura K, Ikebuchi M, Kanaoka Y, et al: Relationships between matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms, Int Angiol 22(3):229–238, 2003.
38. Papalambros E, Sigala F, Georgopoulos S, et al: Immunohistochemical expression of metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 in abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with symptoms and aortic diameter, Int J Mol Med 12(6):965–968, 2003.
39. Petersen E, Gineitis A, Wagberg F, et al: Activity of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Relation to size and rupture, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 20(5):457–461, 2000.
40. Petersen E, Wagberg F, Angquist KA: Serum concentrations of elastin-derived peptides in patients with specific manifestations of atherosclerotic disease, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24(5):440–444, 2002.
41. Tamarina NA, McMillan WD, Shively VP, et al: Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in aneurysms and normal aorta, Surgery 122(2):264–271, 1997; discussion 271–262.
42. Pyo R, Lee JK, Shipley JM, et al: Targeted gene disruption of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (gelatinase B) suppresses development of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Clin Invest 105(11):1641–1649, 2000.
43. Annabi B, Shedid D, Ghosn P, et al: Differential regulation of matrix metalloproteinase activities in abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg 35(3):539–546, 2002.
44. Crowther M, Goodall S, Jones JL, et al: Localization of matrix metalloproteinase 2 within the aneurysmal and normal aortic wall, Br J Surg 87(10):1391–1400, 2000.
45. Henrotin YE, Bruckner P, Pujol JP: The role of reactive oxygen species in homeostasis and degradation of cartilage, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11(10):747–755, 2003.
46. Miller FJ Jr, Sharp WJ, Fang X, et al: Oxidative stress in human abdominal aortic aneurysms: a potential mediator of aneurysmal remodeling, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22(4): 560–565, 2002.
47. Siwik DA, Colucci WS: Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases by cytokines and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species in the myocardium, Heart Fail Rev 9(1):43–51, 2004.
48. Carmeliet P, Moons L, Lijnen R, et al: Urokinase-generated plasmin activates matrix metalloproteinases during aneurysm formation, Nat Genet 17(4):439–444, 1997.
49. Defawe OD, Colige A, Lambert CA, et al: TIMP-2 and PAI-1 mRNA levels are lower in aneurysmal as compared to athero-occlusive abdominal aortas, Cardiovasc Res 60(1): 205–213, 2003.
50. Saito S, Zempo N, Yamashita A, et al: Matrix metalloproteinase expressions in arteriosclerotic aneurysmal disease, Vasc Endovasc Surg 36(1):1–7, 2002.
51. Ailawadi G, Knipp BS, Lu G, et al: A nonintrinsic regional basis for increased infrarenal aortic MMP-9 expression and activity, J Vasc Surg 37(5):1059–1066, 2003.
52. Allaire E, Forough R, Clowes M, et al: Local overexpression of TIMP-1 prevents aortic aneurysm degeneration and rupture in a rat model, J Clin Invest 102(7):1413–1420, 1998.
53. Silence J, Collen D, Lijnen HR: Reduced atherosclerotic plaque but enhanced aneurysm formation in mice with inactivation of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) gene, Circ Res 90(8):897–903, 2002.
54. Falkenberg M, Holmdahl L, Tjarnstrom J, et al: Abnormal levels of urokinase plasminogen activator protein and tissue plasminogen activator activity in human aortic aneurysms, Eur J Surg 167(1):10–14, 2001.
55. Qian HS, Gu JM, Liu P, et al: Overexpression of PAI-1 prevents the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm in mice, Gene Ther 15(3):224–232, 2008.
56. Thompson RW, Liao S, Curci JA: Therapeutic potential of tetracycline derivatives to suppress the growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms, Adv Dent Res 12(2):159–165, 1998.
57. Manning MW, Cassis LA, Daugherty A: Differential effects of doxycycline, a broad­spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, on angiotensin II-induced atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysms, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23(3):483–488, 2003.
58. Bartoli MA, Parodi FE, Chu J, et al: Localized administration of doxycycline suppresses aortic dilatation in an experimental mouse model of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Ann Vasc Surg 20(2):228–236, 2006.
59. Chung AW, Yang HH, Radomski MW, et al: Long-term doxycycline is more effective than atenolol to prevent thoracic aortic aneurysm in Marfan syndrome through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9, Circ Res 102(8):e73–e85, 2008.
60. Curci JA, Mao D, Bohner DG, et al: Preoperative treatment with doxycycline reduces aortic wall expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinases in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg 31(2):325–342, 2000.
61. Baxter BT, Pearce WH, Waltke EA, et al: Prolonged administration of doxycycline in patients with small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: report of a prospective (phase II) multicenter study, J Vasc Surg 36(1):1–12, 2002.
62. Lindeman JH, Abdul-Hussien H, van Bockel JH, et al: Clinical trial of doxycycline for matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibition in patients with an abdominal aneurysm: doxycycline selectively depletes aortic wall neutrophils and cytotoxic T cells, Circulation 119(16): 2209–2216, 2009.
63. Mosorin M, Juvonen J, Biancari F, et al: Use of doxycycline to decrease the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, J Vasc Surg 34(4):606–610, 2001.
64. Dodd BR, Spence RA: Doxycycline inhibition of abdominal aortic aneur ysm growth–a systematic review of the literature, Curr Vasc Pharmacol 9:471–478, 2011.
65. Nagashima H, Aoka Y, Sakomura Y, et al: A 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, cerivastatin, suppresses production of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in human abdominal aortic aneurysm wall, J Vasc Surg 36(1):158–163, 2002.
66. Ejiri J, Inoue N, Tsukube T, et al: Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of thoracic aortic aneurysm: protective role of statin and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, Cardiovasc Res 59(4):988–996, 2003.
67. Schouten O, van Laanen JH, Boersma E, et al: Statins are associated with a reduced infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm growth, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32(1):21–26, 2006.
68. Takagi H, Matsui M, Umemoto T: A meta-analysis of clinical studies of statins for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion, J Vasc Surg 52(6):1675–1681, 2010.
69. Rahman MN, Khan JA, Mazari FA, et al: A randomized placebo controlled trial of the effect of preoperative statin use on matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases in areas of low and peak wall stress in patients undergoing elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Ann Vasc Surg 25(1):32–38, 2011.
70. Hurks R, Hoefer IE, Vink A, et al: Different effects of commonly prescribed statins on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall biology, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39(5):569–576, 2010.
71. Ferguson CD, Clanc y P, Bourke B, et al: Association of statin prescription with small abdominal aortic aneurysm progression, Am Heart J 159(2):307–313, 2010.
72. Holmes DR, Petrinec D, Wester W, et al: Indomethacin prevents elastase-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms in the rat, J Surg Res 63(1):305–309, 1996.
73. Franklin IJ, Walton LJ, Greenhalgh RM, et al: The influence of indomethacin on the metabolism and cytokine secretion of human aneurysmal aorta, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 18(1):35–42, 1999.
74. Miralles M, Wester W, Sicard GA, et al: Indomethacin inhibits expansion of experimental aortic aneurysms via inhibition of the COX2 isoform of cyclooxygenase, J Vasc Surg 29(5):884–892, 1999; discussion 892–883.
75. Walton LJ, Franklin IJ, Bayston T, et al: Inhibition of prostaglandin E2 synthesis in abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for smooth muscle cell viability, inflammatory processes, and the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms, Circulation 100(1):48–54, 1999.
76. Reilly JM, Miralles M, Wester WN, et al: Differential expression of prostaglandin E2 and interleukin-6 in occlusive and aneurysmal aortic disease, Surgery 126(4):624–627, 1999; discussion 627–628.
77. Holmes DR, Wester W, Thompson RW, et al: Prostaglandin E2 synthesis and cyclooxygenase expression in abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg 25(5):810–815, 1997.
78. Bayston T, Ramessur S, Reise J, et al: Prostaglandin E2 receptors in abdominal aortic aneurysm and human aortic smooth muscle cells, J Vasc Surg 38(2):354–359, 2003.
79. Libby P: Inflammation in atherosclerosis, Nature 420(6917):868–874, 2002.
80. Rose AG, Dent DM: Inflammatory variant of abdominal atherosclerotic aneurysm, Arch Pathol Lab Med 105(8):409–413, 1981.
81. Satta J, Laurila A, Paakko P, et al: Chronic inflammation and elastin degradation in abdominal aortic aneurysm disease: an immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15(4):313–319, 1998.
82. Golledge AL, Walker P, Norman PE, et al: A systematic review of studies examining inflammation associated cytokines in human abdominal aortic aneurysm samples, Dis Markers 26(4):181–188, 2009.
83. Treska V, Kocova J, Boudova L, et al: Inflammation in the wall of abdominal aortic aneur ysm and its role in the symptomatology of aneurysm, Cytokines Cell Mol Ther 7(3):91–97, 2002.
84. Wilson WR, Wills J, Furness PN, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture is not associated with an up-regulation of inflammation within the aneurysm wall, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40(2):191–195, 2010.
85. Parry DJ, Al-Barjas HS, Chappell L, et al: Markers of inflammation in men with small abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 52(1):145–151, 2010.
86. Hellenthal FA, Buurman WA, Wodzig WK, et al: Biomarkers of abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Part 2: inflammation, Nat Rev Cardiol 6(8):543–552, 2009.
87. Vainas T, Lubbers T, Stassen FR, et al: Serum C-reactive protein level is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm size and may be produced by aneurysmal tissue, Circulation 107(8):1103–1105, 2003.
88. Truijers M, Kurvers HA, Bredie SJ, et al: In vivo imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms: increased FDG uptake suggests inflammation in the aneurysm wall, J Endovasc Ther 15(4):462–467, 2008.
89. Howarth SP, Tang TY, Graves MJ, et al: Non-invasive MR imaging of inflammation in a patient with both asymptomatic carotid atheroma and an abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case report, Ann Surg Innov Res 1:4, 2007.
90. Tang EH, Shvartz E, Shimizu K, et al: Deletion of EP4 on bone marrow-derived cells enhances inflammation and angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31(2):261–269, 2011.
91. Shiraya S, Miyake T, Aoki M, et al: Inhibition of development of experimental aortic abdominal aneurysm in rat model by atorvastatin through inhibition of macrophage migration, Atherosclerosis 202(1):34–40, 2009.
92. Kalyanasundaram A, Elmore JR, Manazer JR, et al: Simvastatin suppresses experimental aortic aneurysm expansion, J Vasc Surg 43(1):117–124, 2006.
93. Schultz G, Tedesco MM, Sho E, et al: Enhanced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in thrombin-activatable procarboxypeptidase B-deficient mice, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30(7):1363–1370, 2010.
94. Leeper NJ, Tedesco MM, Kojima Y, et al: Apelin prevents aortic aneurysm formation by inhibiting macrophage inflammation, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296(5):H1329–H1335, 2009.
95. Onoda M, Yoshimura K, Aoki H, et al: Lysyl oxidase resolves inflammation by reducing monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in abdominal aortic aneurysm, Atherosclerosis 208(2):366–369, 2010.
96. K aneko H, Anzai T, Morisawa M, et al: Resveratrol prevents the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm through attenuation of inflammation, oxidative stress, and neovascularization, Atherosclerosis 217:350–357, 2011.
97. Hannawa KK, Cho BS, Sinha I, et al: Attenuation of experimental aortic aneurysm formation in P-selectin knockout mice, Ann N Y Acad Sci 108:353–359, 2006.
98. Wolinsky H, Glagov S: Comparison of abdominal and thoracic aortic medial structure in mammals. Deviation of man from the usual pattern, Circ Res 25(6):677–686, 1969.
99. Benjamin HB, Becker AB: Etiologic incidence of thoracic and abdominal aneurysms, Surg Gynecol Obstet 125(6):1307–1310, 1967.
100. Stefanadis C, Vlachopoulos C, Karayannacos P, et al: Effect of vasa vasorum flow on structure and function of the aorta in experimental animals, Circulation 91(10): 2669–2678, 1995.
101. Krettek A, Sukhova GK, Libby P: Elastogenesis in human arterial disease: a role for macrophages in disordered elastin synthesis, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23(4): 582–587, 2003.
102. Moore JE Jr, Ku DN, Zarins CK, et al: Pulsatile flow visualization in the abdominal aorta under differing physiologic conditions: implications for increased susceptibility to atherosclerosis, J Biomech Eng 114(3):391–397, 1992.
103. Egelhoff CJ, Budwig RS, Elger DF, et al: Model studies of the flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms during resting and exercise conditions, J Biomech 32(12):1319–1329, 1999.
104. Sangiorgi G, D'Averio R, Mauriello A, et al: Plasma levels of metalloproteinases-3 and -9 as markers of successful abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion after endovascular graft treatment, Circulation 104(12 Suppl 1):I288–I295, 2001.
467
CH 37
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PROGNOSIS OF AORTIC ANEURYSMS
468
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
105. Lorelli DR, Jean-Claude JM, Fox CJ, et al: Response of plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 to conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or endovascular exclusion: implications for endoleak, J Vasc Surg 35(5):916–922, 2002.
106. Nakahashi TK, Hoshina K, Tsao PS, et al: Flow loading induces macrophage antioxidative gene expression in experimental aneurysms, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22(12): 2017–2022, 2002.
107. Sho E, Sho M, Hoshina K, et al: Hemodynamic forces regulate mural macrophage
CH
37
infiltration in experimental aortic aneurysms, Exp Mol Pathol 76(2):108–116, 2004.
108. Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, et al: Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 36(3):598–604, 2002.
109. Di Martino ES, Vorp DA: Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress, Ann Biomed Eng 31(7):804–809, 2003.
110. Thubrikar MJ, Robicsek F, Labrosse M, et al: Effect of thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall dilation and stress, J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 44(1):67–77, 2003.
111. Speelman L, Schurink GW, Bosboom EM, et al: The mechanical role of thrombus on the growth rate of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 51(1):19–26, 2010.
112. Bluestein D, Dumont K, De Beule M, et al: Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm--FSI modelling, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 12(1):73–81, 2009.
113. Georgakarakos E, Ioannou C, Kostas T, et al: Inflammatory response to aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus may cause increased 18F-FDG uptake at sites not associated with high wall stress: comment on "high levels of 18F-FDG uptake in aortic aneurysm wall are associated with high wall stress", Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39(6):795, 2010; author reply 795–796.
114. Li ZY, U-King-Im J, Tang TY, et al: Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 47(5):928–935, 2008.
115. Wiernicki I, Cnotliwy M, Baranowska-Bosiacka I, et al: Elastin degradation within the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall–relationship between intramural pH and adjacent thrombus formation, Eur J Clin Invest 38(12):883–887, 2008.
116. Fontaine V, Jacob MP, Houard X, et al: Involvement of the mural thrombus as a site of protease release and activation in human aortic aneurysms, Am J Pathol 161(5): 1701–1710, 2002.
117. Breeuwer M, de Putter S, Kose U, et al: Towards patient-specific risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Med Biol Eng Comput 46(11):1085–1095, 2008.
118. Sheidaei A, Hunley SC, Zeinali-Davarani S, et al: Simulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth with updating hemodynamic loads using a realistic geometry, Med Eng Phys 33(1):80–88, 2011.
119. Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Papaharilaou Y, et al: Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk: what have we learned so far? J Endovasc Ther 18(2):214–225, 2011.
120. Reeps C, Gee M, Maier A, et al: The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 51(3):679–688, 2010.
121. Malkawi AH, Hinchliffe RJ, Xu Y, et al: Patient-specific biomechanical profiling in abdominal aortic aneurysm development and rupture, J Vasc Surg 52(2):480–488, 2010.
122. Maier A, Gee MW, Reeps C, et al: A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction, Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3124–3134, 2010.
123. Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Kamarianakis Y, et al: The role of geometric parameters in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39(1):42–48, 2010.
124. Vande Geest JP, Di Martino ES, Bohra A, et al: A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application, Ann N Y Acad Sci 1085:1–21, 2006.
125. Vande Geest JP, Dillavou ED, Di Mar tino ES, et al: Gender-related differences in the tensile strength of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Ann N Y Acad Sci 1085:400–402, 2006.
126. Darling RC, Messina CR, Brewster DC, et al: Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection, Circulation 56(3 Suppl):II161–II164, 1977.
127. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al: The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators, Arch Intern Med 160(10):1425–1430, 2000.
128. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, et al: The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet 360(9345):1531–1539, 2002.
129. Derubertis BG, Trocciola SM, Ryer EJ, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: prevalence, risk factors, and implications for screening, J Vasc Surg 46(4):630–635, 2007.
130. Scott RA, Ashton HA, Kay DN: Abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4237 screened patients: prevalence, development and management over 6 years [see comments], Br J Surg 78(9):1122–1125, 1991.
131. Singh K, Bonaa KH, Jacobsen BK, et al: Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: the Tromso Study, Am J Epidemiol 154(3): 236–244, 2001.
132. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE: Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women, J Vasc Surg 34(1):122–126, 2001.
133. Alcorn HG, Wolfson SK Jr, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al: Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in older adults enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16(8):963–970, 1996.
134. Kurvers HA, van der Graaf Y, Blankensteijn JD, et al: Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: comparing the yield between patients with manifest atherosclerosis and patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis only, J Vasc Surg 37(6):1226–1233, 2003.
135. Tornwall ME, Virtamo J, Haukka JK, et al: Life-style factors and risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of Finnish male smokers, Epidemiology 12(1):94–100, 2001.
136. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al: Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group, Ann Intern Med 126(6):441–449, 1997.
137. Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, van der Does E, et al: Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults. The Rotterdam Study, Am J Epidemiol 142(12):1291–1299, 1995.
138. Rodin MB, Daviglus ML, Wong GC, et al: Middle age cardiovascular risk factors and abdominal aortic aneurysm in older age, Hypertension 42(1):61–68, 2003.
139. Scott RA, Bridgewater SG, Ashton HA: Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women, Br J Surg 89(3):283–285, 2002.
140. Vardulaki KA, Walker NM, Day NE, et al: Quantifying the risks of hypertension, age, sex and smoking in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, Br J Surg 87(2):195–200, 2000.
141. Doll R, Peto R, Wheatley K, et al: Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observations on male British doctors, BMJ 309(6959):901–911, 1994.
142. Goldberg RJ, Burchfiel CM, Benfante R, et al: Lifestyle and biologic factors associated with atherosclerotic disease in middle-aged men. 20-year findings from the Honolulu Heart Program, Arch Intern Med 155(7):686–694, 1995.
143. Hammond EC: Smoking in relation to the death rates of one million men and women, Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 19:127–204, 1966.
144. Nilsson S, Carstensen JM, Pershagen G: Mortality among male and female smokers in Sweden: a 33-year follow-up, J Epidemiol Community Health 55(11):825–830, 2001.
145. Rogot E, Murray JL: Smoking and causes of death among U.S. veterans: 16 years of observation, Public Health Rep 95(3):213–222, 1980.
146. Tang JL, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al: Mortality in relation to tar yield of cigarettes: a prospective study of four cohorts, BMJ 311(7019):1530–1533, 1995.
147. Weir JM, Dunn JE Jr: Smoking and mortality: a prospective study, Cancer 25(1):105–112,
1970.
148. Lee AJ, Fowkes FG, Carson MN, et al: Smoking, atherosclerosis and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Eur Heart J 18(4):671–676, 1997.
149. Wilmink TB, Quick CR, Day NE: The association between cigarette smoking and abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg 30(6):1099–1105, 1999.
150. Strachan DP: Predictors of death from aortic aneurysm among middle-aged men: the Whitehall study, Br J Surg 78(4):401–404, 1991.
151. Lederle FA, Nelson DB, Joseph AM: Smokers' relative risk for aortic aneurysm compared with other smoking-related diseases: a systematic review, J Vasc Surg 38(2):329–334, 2003.
152. Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM: Clinical practice. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms, N Engl J Med 348(19):1895–1901, 2003.
153. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al: Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, N Engl J Med 346(19):1437–1444, 2002.
154. Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance, Circulation 110(1):16–21, 2004.
155. Baumgartner I, Hirsch AT, Abola MT, et al: Cardiovascular risk profile and outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in out-patients with atherothrombosis: data from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry, J Vasc Surg 48(4):808–814, 2008.
156. Franks PJ, Edwards RJ, Greenhalgh RM, et al: Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in smokers, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11(4):487–492, 1996.
157. Blanchard JF, Armenian HK , Friesen PP: Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a case-control study, Am J Epidemiol 151(6):575–583, 2000.
158. Brown LC, Powell JT: Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants, Ann Surg 230(3):289–296, 1999; discussion 296–287.
159. Hobbs SD, Claridge MW, Quick CR, et al: LDL cholesterol is associated with small abdominal aortic aneurysms, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(6):618–622, 2003.
160. Gillum RF: Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States, J Clin Epidemiol 48(11):1289–1298, 1995.
161. Norrgard O, Rais O, Angquist KA: Familial occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysms, Surgery 95(6):650–656, 1984.
162. Lederle FA: Ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, Ann Intern Med 139(6):516–522, 2003.
163. Baird PA, Sadovnick AD, Yee IM, et al: Sibling risks of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Lancet 346(8975):601–604, 1995.
164. Verloes A, Sakalihasan N, Koulischer L, et al: Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: familial and genetic aspects in three hundred thirteen pedigrees, J Vasc Surg 21(4):646–655, 1995.
165. Frydman G, Walker PJ, Summers K, et al: The value of screening in siblings of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(4):396–400, 2003.
166. Adams DC, Tulloh BR, Galloway SW, et al: Familial abdominal aortic aneurysm: prevalence and implications for screening, Eur J Vasc Surg 7(6):709–712, 1993.
167. Cole CW, Barber GG, Bouchard AG, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm: consequences of a positive family history, Can J Surg 32(2):117–120, 1989.
168. Webster MW, Ferrell RE, St. Jean PL, et al: Ultrasound screening of first-degree relatives of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 13(1):9–13, 1991 discussion 13–14.
169. Webster MW, St. Jean PL, Steed DL, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a family study, J Vasc Surg 13(3):366–372, 1991.
170. Majumder PP, St Jean PL, Ferrell RE, et al: On the inheritance of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Am J Hum Genet 48(1):164–170, 1991.
171. Wahlgren CM, Larsson E, Magnusson PK, et al: Genetic and environmental contributions to abdominal aortic aneurysm development in a twin population, J Vasc Surg 51(1):3–7, 2010; discussion 7.
172. Wiernicki I, Gutowski P, Ciechanowski K, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysm: association between haptoglobin phenotypes, elastase activity, and neutrophil count in the peripheral blood, Vasc Surg 35(5):345–350, 2001; discussion 351.
173. St Jean P, Hart B, Webster M, et al: Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency in aneurysmal disease, Hum Hered 46(2):92–97, 1996.
174. Schardey HM, Hernandez-Richter T, Klueppelberg U, et al: Alleles of the alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotype in patients with aortic aneurysms, J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 39(5):535–539,
1998.
175. Hinterseher I, Tromp G, Kuivaniemi H: Genes and abdominal aortic aneurysm, Ann Vasc Surg 25(3):388–412, 2011.
176. Thompson AR, Cooper JA, Jones GT, et al: Assessment of the association between genetic polymorphisms in transforming growth factor beta, and its binding protein (LTBP), and the presence, and expansion, of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Atherosclerosis 209(2):367– 373, 2010.
177. Golledge J, Clancy P, Jones GT, et al: Possible association between genetic polymorphisms in transforming growth factor beta receptors, serum transforming growth factor beta1 concentration and abdominal aortic aneurysm, Br J Surg 96(6):628–632, 2009.
178. Elmore JR, Obmann MA, Kuivaniemi H, et al: Identification of a genetic variant associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms on chromosome 3p12.3 by genome wide association. J Vasc Surg 49(6):1525–1531, 2009.
179. Gretarsdottir S, Baas AF, Thorleifsson G, et al: Genome-wide association study identifies a sequence variant within the DAB2IP gene conferring susceptibility to abdominal aortic aneurysm, Nat Genet 42(8):692–697, 2010.
180. Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP, et al: The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm, Nat Genet 40(2):217–224, 2008.
181. Thompson AR, Golledge J, Cooper JA, et al: Sequence variant on 9p21 is associated with the presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm disease but does not have an impact on aneurysmal expansion, Eur J Hum Genet 17(3):391–394, 2009.
182. Atturu G, Brouilette S, Samani NJ, et al: Short leukocyte telomere length is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39(5):559–564, 2010.
183. Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP, Smith RF: Clinical fate of the patient with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm and unfit for surgical treatment, Arch Surg 104(4):600–606, 1972.
184. Bickerstaff LK, Hollier LH, Van Peenen HJ, et al: Abdominal aortic aneurysms: the changing natural history, J Vasc Surg 1(1):6–12, 1984.
185. Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallett JW Jr: Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study, N Engl J Med 321(15):1009–1014, 1989.
186. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al: Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair, JAMA 287(22):2968–2972, 2002.
187. Harris LM, Faggioli GL, Fiedler R, et al: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: factors affecting mortality rates, J Vasc Surg 14(6):812–818, 1991 discussion 819–820.
188. Mor tality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants, Lancet 352(9141):1649–1655, 1998.
189. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent KC, et al: Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg 51(5):1081–1087, 2010.
190. Brown PM, Sobolev B, Zelt DT: Selective management of abdominal aortic aneurysms smaller than 5.0 cm in a prospective sizing program with gender-specific analysis, J Vasc Surg 38(4):762–765, 2003.
191. Powell JT, Brown LC: The natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms and their risk of rupture, Acta Chir Belg 101(1):11–16, 2001.
192. Evans SM, Adam DJ, Bradbury AW: The influence of gender on outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, J Vasc Surg 32(2):258–262, 2000.
193. Isselbacher EM: Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms, Circulation 111(6):816–828,
2005.
194. Svensson LG: Natural history of aneurysms of the descending and thoracoabdominal aorta, J Card Surg 12(2 Suppl):279–284, 1997.
195. Ince H, Nienaber CA: Etiology, pathogenesis and management of thoracic aortic aneurysm, Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 4(8):418–427, 2007.
196. Svensjo S, Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D: Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and dissection: an investigation based on autopsy, Br J Surg 83(1):68–71, 1996.
197. Bickerstaff L, Pairolero P, Hollier L, et al: Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study, Surgery 92(6):1103–1108, 1982.
198. Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, et al: Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations, J Vasc Surg 17(2):357–368, 1993; discussion 368–370.
199. Guo D, Hasham S, Kuang SQ, et al: Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections: genetic heterogeneity with a major locus mapping to 5q13–14, Circulation 103(20):2461– 2468, 2001.
200. Crawford ES, DeNatale RW: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: observations regarding the natural course of the disease, J Vasc Surg 3(4):578–582, 1986.
201. Cambria RA, Gloviczki P, Stanson AW, et al: Outcome and expansion rate of 57 thoracoab­dominal aortic aneurysms managed nonoperatively, Am J Surg 170(2):213–217, 1995.
202. Griepp RB, Ergin MA, Galla JD, et al: Natural history of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms, Ann Thorac Surg 67(6):1927–1930, 1999; discussion 1953–1928.
203. Pitt MP, Bonser RS: The natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysm disease: an overview, J Card Surg 12(2 Suppl):270–278, 1997.
204. Juvonen T, Ergin MA, Galla JD, et al: Prospective study of the natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms, Ann Thorac Surg 63(6):1533–1545, 1997.
205. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al: Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size, Ann Thorac Surg 73(1):17–27, discussion 27–18, 2002.
206. Elef teriades JA: Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms: indications for surgery, and surgical versus nonsurgical risks, Ann Thorac Surg 74(5):S1877–S1880, 2002; discussion S1892–1878.
207. Dapunt OE, Galla JD, Sadeghi AM, et al: The natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107(5):1323–1332, 1994; discussion 1332–1323.
208. Pressler V, McNamara JJ: Aneurysm of the thoracic aorta. Review of 260 cases, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89(1):50–54, 1985.
209. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al: 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/ STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine, Circulation 121(13):e266–e369, 2010.
210. Gott VL, Greene PS, Alejo DE, et al: Replacement of the aortic root in patients with Marfan's syndrome, N Engl J Med 340(17):1307–1313, 1999.
211. Svensson LG, Kouchoukos NT, Miller DC, et al: Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts, Ann Thorac Surg 85(1 Suppl):S1–S41, 2008.
212. Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, et al: Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves, JAMA 300(11):1317–1325, 2008.
213. Vallely MP, S emsarian C, Bannon PG: Management of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease, Heart Lung Circ 17(5):357–363, 2008.
214. Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T, et al: Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF­beta receptor, N Engl J Med 355(8):788–798, 2006.
215. Habashi JP, Judge DP, Holm TM, et al: Losartan, an AT1 antagonist, prevents aortic aneurysm in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome, Science 312(5770):117–121, 2006.
216. El-Hamamsy I, Yacoub MH: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of thoracic aortic aneurysms, Nature Reviews Cardiology 6(12):771–786, 2009.
217. Germain DP: Clinical and genetic features of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Ann Vasc Surg 16(3):391–397, 2002.
218. Arteaga-Solis E, Gayraud B, Ramirez F: Elastic and collagenous networks in vascular diseases, Cell Struct Funct 25(2):69–72, 2000.
219. Nishiyama Y, Manabe N, Ooshima A, et al: A sporadic case of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV: diagnosed by a morphometric study of collagen content, Pathol Int 45(7):524–529, 1995.
220. Pepin M, Schwarze U, Superti-Furga A, et al: Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type, N Engl J Med 342(10):673–680, 2000.
221. Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, et al: Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves, Heart 82(1):19–22, 1999.
222. Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Plappert T, et al: Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions, Circulation 102(19 Suppl
3):III35–III39, 2000.
223. Yasuda H, Nakatani S, Stugaard M, et al: Failure to prevent progressive dilation of ascending aorta by aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with tricuspid aortic valve, Circulation 108(Suppl 1):II291–II294, 2003.
224. Fedak PW, de Sa MP, Verma S, et al: Vascular matrix remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve malformations: implications for aortic dilatation, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(3):797–806, 2003.
225. Schmid FX, Bielenberg K, Holmer S, et al: Structural and biomolecular changes in aorta and pulmonary trunk of patients with aortic aneurysm and valve disease: implications for the Ross procedure, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25(5):748–753, 2004.
226. Boyum J, Fellinger EK, Schmoker JD, et al: Matrix metalloproteinase activity in thoracic aortic aneurysms associated with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127(3):686–691, 2004.
227. Sybert VP: Cardiovascular malformations and complications in Turner syndrome, Pediatrics 101(1):E11, 1998.
228. Jenkins NP, Ward C: Coarctation of the aorta: natural history and outcome after surgical treatment, QJM 92(7):365–371, 1999.
229. Knyshov GV, Sitar LL, Glagola MD, et al: Aortic aneurysms at the site of the repair of coarctation of the aorta: a review of 48 patients, Ann Thorac Surg 61(3):935–939, 1996.
230. Benzaquen BS, Therrien J: Thoracic aortic aneurysm occurring at a coarctation repair site, Can J Cardiol 19(5):561–562, 2003.
231. Rao PS, Galal O, Smith PA, et al: Five- to nine-year follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation in infants and children, J Am Coll Cardiol 27(2):462–470, 1996.
232. Fletcher SE, Nihill MR, Grifka RG, et al: Balloon angioplasty of native coarctation of the aorta: midterm follow-up and prognostic factors, J Am Coll Cardiol 25(3):730–734, 1995.
233. Beck man JA: Giant cell arteritis, Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2(3):213–218, 2000.
234. Nuenninghoff DM, Hunder GG, Christianson TJ, et al: Incidence and predictors of large­artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-artery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based study over 50 years, Arthritis Rheum 48(12):3522–3531, 2003.
235. Evans JM, Bowles CA, Bjornsson J, et al: Thoracic aortic aneurysm and rupture in giant cell arteritis. A descriptive study of 41 cases, [published erratum appears in Arthritis Rheum 38(2):290, 1995], Arthritis Rheum 37(10):1539–1547, 1994.
236. Nuenninghoff DM, Hunder GG, Christianson TJ, et al: Mortality of large-artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-ar tery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based study over 50 years, Arthritis Rheum 48(12):3532–3537, 2003.
237. Nikkari ST, Hoyhtya M, Isola J, et al: Macrophages contain 92-kd gelatinase (MMP-9) at the site of degenerated internal elastic lamina in temporal arteritis, Am J Pathol 149(5): 1427–1433, 1996.
238. Tomita T, Imak awa K: Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in giant cell arteritis: an immunocytochemical study, Pathology 30(1):40–50, 1998.
239. Subramanyan R, Joy J, Balakrishnan KG: Natural history of aortoarteritis (Takayasu's disease), Circulation 80(3):429–437, 1989.
240. Kerr GS, Hallahan CW, Giordano J, et al: Takayasu arteritis, Ann Intern Med 120(11):919–929,
1994.
241. Ishikawa K, Maetani S: Long-term outcome for 120 Japanese patients with Takayasu's disease. Clinical and statistical analyses of related prognostic factors, Circulation 90(4):1855–1860, 1994.
242. Roldan CA, Chavez J, Wiest PW, et al: Aortic root disease and valve disease associated with ankylosing spondylitis, J Am Coll Cardiol 32(5):1397–1404, 1998.
243. Sakane T, Takeno M, Suzuki N, et al: Behcet's disease, N Engl J Med 341(17):1284–1291,
1999.
244. Yazici H, Yurdakul S, Hamuryudan V: Behcet disease, Curr Opin Rheumatol 13(1):18–22, 2001.
245. Ehrlich GE: Vasculitis in Behcet's disease, Int Rev Immunol 14(1):81–88, 1997.
246. Roldan CA, Chavez J, Wiest PW, et al: Aortic root disease and valve disease associated with ankylosing spondylitis, J Am Coll Cardiol 32(5):1397–1404, 1998.
247. Amor B: Reiter's syndrome. Diagnosis and clinical features, Rheum Dis Clin North Am 24(4):677–695, vii, 1998.
248. Letko E, Zafirakis P, Baltatzis S, et al: Relapsing polychondritis: a clinical review, Semin Arthritis Rheum 31(6):384–395, 2002.
249. Parkhurst GF, Dekcer JP: Bacterial aortitis and mycotic aneurysm of the aorta; a report of twelve cases, Am J Pathol 31(5):821–835, 1955.
250. Sommerville RL, Allen EV, Edwards JE: Bland and infected arteriosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms: a clinicopathologic study, Medicine (Baltimore) 38:207–221, 1959.
251. Bennett DE, Cherry JK: Bacterial infection of aortic aneurysms. A clinicopathologic study, Am J Surg 113(3):321–326, 1967.
469
CH 37
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PROGNOSIS OF AORTIC ANEURYSMS
470
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
252. Sedwitz MM, Hye RJ, Stabile BE: The changing epidemiology of pseudoaneurysm. Therapeutic implications, Arch Surg 123(4):473–476, 1988.
253. Mansur AJ, Grinberg M, Leao PP, et al: Extracranial mycotic aneurysms in infective endocarditis, Clin Cardiol 9(2):65–72, 1986.
254. Anderson CB, Butcher HR Jr, Ballinger WF: Mycotic aneurysms, Arch Surg 109(5):712–717,
1974.
255. Jarrett F, Darling RC, Mundth ED, et al: The management of infected arterial aneurysms,
CH
37
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 18(4):361–366, 1977.
256. Vogelzang RL, Sohaey R: Infected aortic aneurysms: CT appearance, J Comput Assist Tomogr 12(1):109–112, 1988.
257. Taylor LM Jr, Deitz DM, McConnell DB, et al: Treatment of infected abdominal aneurysms by extraanatomic bypass, aneurysm excision, and drainage, Am J Surg 155(5):655–658,
1988.
258. Johansen K, Devin J: Mycotic aortic aneurysms. A reappraisal, Arch Surg 118(5):583–588,
1983.
259. Long R, Guzman R, Greenberg H, et al: Tuberculous mycotic aneurysm of the aorta: review of published medical and surgical experience, Chest 115(2):522–531, 1999.
260. Pugh PJ, Grech ED: Syphilitic aortitis, N Engl J Med 346(9):676, 2002.
CHAPTER
38 Clinical Evaluation of Aortic
Aneurysms
Joshua A. Beckman, Mark A. Creager
Clinical History
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
Aneurysms of the thoracic aorta typically produce no symptoms, but a variety of symptom complexes may arise related to aneurysm size and location within the thorax.
Patients with aneurysmal dilation of the ascending thoracic aorta may develop clinical manifestations of congestive heart failure (CHF) as a consequence of aortic valvular regurgita­tion. Enlargement of the sinuses of Valsalva may cause myo­cardial ischemia or infarction due to direct compression of the coronary arteries or coronary arterial thromboembolism. Right ventricular (RV) outflow tract obstruction and tricuspid regurgitation may result from aneurysmal deformation of the noncoronary sinus. Aneurysms of the sinuses of Valsalva may rupture directly into the RV cavity, right atrium, or pulmonary artery, causing heart failure associated with a continuous mur­mur. Chest pain may occur when the aneurysm compresses sur­rounding structures or erodes into adjacent bone such as the ribs or sternum. Compression of the superior vena cava may pro­duce venous congestion of the head, neck, and upper extremi­ties. Symptoms are frequently a harbinger of rupture or death. Rupture may occur into the left pleural space, pericardium, pul­monary artery, or superior vena cava.
Aneurysms of the aortic arch may produce symptoms by compression of contiguous structures, but most are asymptomatic. Dyspnea or cough may be caused by compression of the trachea or mainstem bronchi, dysphagia by compression of the esopha­gus, or hoarseness secondary to left vocal cord paralysis related to compression of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve. The superior vena cava syndrome and pulmonary artery stenosis result when these vessels are compressed. pression of adjacent structures or to erosion of ribs or vertebrae, is typically positional. Aneurysms of the aortic arch may rupture into the mediastinum, pleural space, tracheobronchial tree (causing hemoptysis), or esophagus (causing hematemesis). Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) may result from rupture into the superior vena cava or pulmonary artery. Tuberculous aneurysms, akin to other causes of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs), may present with pain but are commonly asymptomatic or may present with hypovolemic shock as a consequence of rupture.
Symptoms of descending TAAs include chest pain from compression of surrounding soft tissues or erosion of vertebrae. Irritation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve may produce hoarseness. Dyspnea may result from bronchial compression, and hemoptysis from direct erosion into the lung parenchyma. Dysphagia and hematemesis are features of esophageal compression or erosion. Rupture may occur into the mediastinum or left pleural space.
1,2
Chest pain, related either to com-
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Although most patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) are asymptomatic, discomfort occasionally develops in the epigastrium or left upper quadrant of the abdomen. Back or flank pain may occur when the patient lies in left lateral decubitus position. Erosion of the anterior surfaces of the vertebral bodies may occur, leading to radiculopathy. Visceral artery occlusion may occur, but frank ischemia and infarction are infrequent. Patients who complain of claudication also may have occlusive athero­sclerotic disease of the aorta, iliac, or more distal arteries. Because mural thrombosis is so common in atherosclerotic aneurysms, they may be the source of peripheral atheroembolism, causing occlu­sion of distal vessels. Rupture of the thoracic component of these aneurysms generally occurs into the left pleural space, producing a hemothorax; the abdominal component may rupture into the retroperitoneum, inferior vena cava, or duodenum.
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Occasionally, nascent or frank rupture occurs and causes symp­toms indicating a life-threatening emergency. The mortality of patients with AAA rupture is 60%; patients with symptoms sugges­tive of rupture require emergent surgical referral. The classical triad associated with AAA rupture includes hypotension, back pain, and a pulsatile abdominal mass; however, fewer than 50% of patients have all components of this triad. Diverticulitis, renal colic, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage represent common disorders in the differential diagnosis in these patients.
In the absence of patient complaints, physicians must intuit the presence of aneurysm based on the clinical characteristics of the patient. Risk factors for aortic aneurysm disease (see Chapter 37) can be used to guide directed physical examination and, if neces­sary, diagnostic testing.
Physical Examination
Physical examination is usually unhelpful in diagnosing TAAs because the rib cage precludes palpation of the aorta. Physical examination may demonstrate right sternoclavicular lift or tra­cheal deviation. Dilation of the aortic root may cause aortic valve regurgitation.
The key physical finding for an AAA is a pulsatile abdominal mass. The patient should be positioned supine with the knees flexed. A pulsatile epigastric or periumbilical mass may be visible as well as palpable. To distinguish an AAA from paraaortic masses
471
472
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
CH
38
FIGURE 381 Examination to detect lateral borders of an aortic aneurysm should be performed with fingertips of both hands. Aneurysm
should expand laterally with each heart beat. Aortic aneurysm transverse diameter may be estimated as distance between closest fingers.
requires that the examiner's hands address the lateral borders (
Fig. 38-1). An aneurysm expands laterally with each systole. This
technique also permits estimation of the transverse diameter of the aneurysm. Auscultation may reveal a bruit over the mass, but abdominal bruits are not specific for aneurysm formation, and
only about 40% of such aneurysms are associated with bruits. Proper physical examination of the abdomen may detect the pres­ence of an AAA in 30% to 48% of patients with AAA. of 15 studies, sensitivity of abdominal examination for aneurysm detection was 49%
4
(Table 38-1).
3,4
In a review
Several factors limit the potential for AAA diagnosis. First, palpation for an aneurysm requires consideration of the diagno­sis prior to examination. Routine physical examination decreases the sensitivity of the exam. Second, size matters; as the size of an aneurysm increases, so does the likelihood of making the diagnosis. Sensitivity of palpation increases to 75% in patients with aneurysms greater than 5 cm in diameter.4 Third, increas­ing abdominal girth decreases the likelihood of discovery. In one study of 201 patients, all six aneurysms present were diagnosed in patients with an abdominal girth less than 100 cm, but only 3 of 12 were detected when the abdominal girth exceeded 100 cm.5 So although the directed physical examination has moderate sensitivity and specificity for AAA diagnosis, routine examination misses the diagnosis more commonly than making it.
The finding of a pulsatile mass in the groin, suggesting an iliac artery aneurysm, or in the popliteal fossa, suggesting a popliteal artery aneurysm, should raise the index of suspicion that an AAA may be present, since multiple aneurysms often coexist. Physical signs such as carotid bruits or diminished arterial pulses in the lower extremities may reflect atherosclerosis of other vessels.
Rupture of an AAA usually produces the clinical picture of extreme distress as a result of abdominal catastrophe. Despite surgical advances, mortality is still the rule because of the abrupt nature of circulatory collapse, which prevents timely intervention in most cases. Patients frequently have severe abdominal or back pain, but the pattern of pain varies considerably and may be either persistent or intermittent, sharp or dull, constricting or burning. The aneurysm may rupture into the retroperitoneum or into the peritoneal or pleural cavities. Patients may develop hypotension, tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, or shock, depending on the extent of rupture and associated blood loss into the extravascular space. On occasion, rupture occurs directly into the duodenum, causing an aortoduodenal fistula and acute gastrointestinal bleeding. This possibility should be considered when gastrointestinal bleeding is evident along with signs of an aneurysm on physical examination.
TABLE 38-1 Sensitivity and Specificity of Physical Examination for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
SOURCE AGE RANGE NO. SCREENED ALL AAA SENSITIVITY 44.9 CM AAA SENSITIVITY 5 CM AAA SENSITIVITY
55
Cabellon
56
Ohman
57
Twomey
58
Allen
59
Allardice
5
Lederle
60
Collin
61
Shapira
Andersson
Spiridonov
MacSweeney
Karanjia
Molnar
al-Zahrani
Arnell
Fink
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
SUMMARY 3155 293 49%
AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; NA, not available. Adapted from Lederle FA, Simel DL: The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 281:77–82, 1999.
43-79 73 9 22% NA NA NA NA
50-88 50 3 0% 1 0% 0 NA
>50 200 14 64% 3 100% 4 75%
>65 168 3 0% 0 NA 1 0%
39-90 100 15 33% 3 100% 2 100%
60-75 201 20 45% 5 20% 5 80%
65-74 426 23 35% NA NA NA NA
31-83 101 4 0% 0 NA 2 0%
38-86 288 14 29% NA NA NA NA
17-67 163 10 70% 4 100% 3 100%
NA 200 55 24% 16 44% 6 100%
55-82 89 9 100% 5 100% 2 100%
65-83 411 7 43% 3 33% 2 50%
60-80 392 7 57% 4 50% 2 100%
55-81 96 1 100% 0 NA 0 NA
51-88 200 99 68% 44 69% 14 82%
Rupture may also occur into the inferior vena cava or iliac veins, producing an arteriovenous fistula; this is suggested by rapid development of leg swelling or so-called high-output CHF in the presence of an AAA.
Screening and Surveillance of Aortic Aneurysms
Several trials have evaluated the possibility of reducing AAA event rates as a result of screening. In a study from Chichester, United Kingdom, 15,775 men and women aged 65 to 80 years were divided in two, and half were invited for an abdominal ultrasound screening. invitation, and aneurysm was detected in 4%. A 55% reduction in rate of aneurysm rupture (2.8 per 1000 vs. 6.2 per 1000 subjects) and a 42% reduction in AAA-related mortality in men only (3 per 1000 vs. 5.3 per 1000 male subjects) were noted in the screening group compared to controls. A similar study in Denmark offered 12,658 65- to 73-year-old males a screening invitation, of whom 9620 accepted and 3038 declined. tion in AAA-related death in the group that accepted the invita­tion compared with those who did not (.006% vs. .06%). Only one trial has assessed the impact of screening on total mortality. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) assessed the impact of AAA screening in 67,800 men aged 65 to 74 years.8 Half were invited for AAA screening, and the others were not. Long-term mortality was monitored in both groups. In the screened group, there was a 42% relative risk reduction in aneurysm-related mortal­ity from 0.33% to 0.19%, representing 48 fewer deaths. Reduction in absolute mortality, however, was a statistically insignificant 0.27%.
Some clinical features exist to suggest which patients should definitely undergo screening for aortic aneurysm, and AAA in particular. These include patients with a family history for aneu­rysm and inherited disorders of connective tissue (e.g., Marfan's syndrome [MFS]) and those with arteritis (e.g., Takayasu and giant cell arteritis [GCA]). Siblings of patients with an AAA have a 25% chance of having an aneurysm.
On the basis of these data, the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Practice Guidelines for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease recommends that “Men 60 years of age or older who are either the siblings or off­spring of patients with AAAs” and “men who are 65 to 75 years of age who have ever smoked should undergo a physical examina­tion and one-time ultrasound screening for detection of AAAs.” The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends one-time screening for AAA by ultrasonography in men aged 65 to 75 who have ever smoked, but does not recommend routine screening in women. ing the “Welcome to Medicare” preventive visit if the patient has a family history of AAA or is a man aged 65 to 75 who has smoked at least 100 cigarettes in his lifetime.
6
Nearly 70% of those offered screening accepted the
7
There was a tenfold reduc-
9
11
Medicare will pay for a one-time ultrasound screen dur-
10
Screening for TAAs is less well established. Recent data have shown that bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is an autosomal dominant condition that may be associated with TAA formation. Interestingly, patients with this condition may manifest the valvular or aneurysmal findings alone or in tandem.
12
Thus, the ACC/AHA thoracic aortic disease guidelines recommend that all patients with a BAV should have both the aortic root and ascending tho­racic aorta evaluated for evidence of aortic dilatation. In pedigree analysis of more than 500 patients with TAA, Albornoz et al. have shown that one in five non-MFS patients have an inherited pattern of disease.
13
Because of the frequency of both known and unknown genetic conditions associated with TAA, the ACC/AHA thoracic aortic disease guidelines recommend that first-degree relatives of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve, premature onset of thoracic aortic disease with minimal risk factors, and/or a familial form of TAA and dissection should be evaluated for the presence of a BAV and asymptomatic thoracic aortic disease.
14
Diagnostic Testing
Major objectives of imaging studies include identifying the aorta and its branches, diagnosing and characterizing the type of aneu­rysm (fusiform or saccular), determining the transverse and lon­gitudinal dimensions of the aneurysm, and detecting associated pathology that may affect treatment. Imaging studies are also indicated for longitudinal surveillance of known aneurysms, or for anatomical definition before endovascular or surgical repairs. An understanding of the benefits and limitations of the several imaging modalities will enable appropriate test selection (Table 38-2).
Chest roentgenography may provide the first indication of a TAA (
Fig. 38-2). Aneurysms of the ascending thoracic aorta are usually
evident on the right side of the mediastinum. Aneurysms of the aortic arch widen the mediastinal shadow and may project more toward the left. These aneurysms may displace or compress the trachea or left mainstem bronchus. Descending TAAs typically appear as mediastinal masses extending into the left hemithorax. Assessment of the aorta by chest roentgenography requires both posteroanterior and lateral projections. Failure to detect TAA roent­genographically, however, does not exclude the diagnosis, since aneurysms may not become apparent until considerable dilation has occurred.
Similarly, plain abdominal roentgenography frequently dis­closes an unsuspected AAA. of the abdomen may disclose a curvilinear rim of calcification in the wall of the aneurysm, and the diameter of the aneurysm may be estimated when such calcification is visible in two oppos­ing walls. In 25% to 50% of suspected cases, however, the walls of the aneurysm are not sufficiently calcified to permit radiographic identification. Furthermore, it may underestimate anteroposterior aneurysm size by 15%.
3
Anteroposterior and lateral views
473
CH 38
CliniCAl EvAluATion of AoRTiC AnEuRysms
TABLE 38-2 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Imaging Modalities: Strengths and Weaknesses
MODALITY ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES OPTIMAL USE
Ultrasound Highly accurate sizing Unable to discern longitudinal extent Initial diagnosis
Inexpensive Cannot define branch artery anatomy Follow-up until repair
CT Highly accurate sizing Ionizing radiation Pre-repair assessment
Defines branch artery involvement well Contrast required Stent graft follow-up
MRA Highly accurate sizing Cannot image some stent grafts Pre-repair assessment
No ionizing radiation Defines branch artery involvement well
Contrast angiography Defines branch artery involvement well Cannot size aneurysm Stent graft implantation
Invasive Ionizing radiation Contrast required
NOTE: Sensitivity and specificity of each examination exceed 95% for diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). CT, computed tomography; MRA, magnetic resonance angiography.
474
AB
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
CH
38
FIGURE 382 Posterior-anterior chest radiograph demonstrating widened mediastinum in patient with a 5-cm ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA).
Ultrasound
Ultrasonography is the most commonly used method for identifica­tion and characterization of AAA. It is the least expensive modality, does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation, and can accu­rately determine the anteroposterior, transverse, and longitudinal dimensions of an AAA ( 3 cm or larger approaches 100%.10 The examination is rapid and easily performed. The abdominal aorta is subject to anteropos­terior, transverse, and longitudinal evaluation. Sonographic clas­sification of AAA begins when the maximum diameter exceeds 3 cm in either anteroposterior or transverse dimensions. Care must be taken to image the aorta perpendicular to its longitudi­nal axis to avoid eccentricity, which may lead to overestimating its true diameter. Thrombus is frequently identified within the lumen, and echodense calcification may be present in or adjacent to the aortic wall. Beyond determining the size of an aneurysm, ultrasound imaging may help define the relation of major arterial branches and adjacent organs. Certain ultrasound characteristics have potential value in predicting rupture. Intramural hematoma, appearing as a hypoechoic soft-tissue mass surrounding the aorta that may silhouette the psoas muscle, appears to represent such a sign.15 This may be indistinguishable from periaortic fibro­sis, which appears on ultrasound examination as a hypoechoic mantle surrounding the aortic wall in patients with inflammatory aortic aneurysms.
Several groups have recently demonstrated the reliability of a “quick screen” in emergency departments. 125 emergency department patients, quick evaluations did not miss an AAA. Emergency department testing had 100% sensitivity
Fig. 38-3). Sensitivity for diagnosis of an AAA
16,17
In a prospective study of
and 98% specificity.18 Indeed, accuracy is maintained at 100% when the “quick screen” and classical examination approaches are com­pared within a noninvasive vascular laboratory.
19
Accuracy of ultrasonography should be considered in respect to other imaging modalities (see later discussion). In the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group study, computed tomog­raphy (CT) and ultrasound were compared. Although both tech­niques demonstrated sizing variability between local and central reading sites,
20
in a third of subjects, the variation between ultra­sound and CT was 0.5 cm or more. Ultrasonographic evaluation undersized the aneurysm by a mean of 0.27 cm compared with CT measurements. Similarly, in 334 patients participating in an aneu­rysm endograft study, CT reported a greater aneurysm diameter than ultrasound 95% of the time.21 The correlation between the two measurements was strong at 0.7, but in nearly half the patients, aortic diameter varied by a centimeter or more between the ultra­sound and CT studies. Smaller studies confirm both the high sensitivity yet consistent undersizing by ultrasound.
Despite these observations, two large surgical trials have shown that ultrasonography is an appropriate method to evaluate and follow AAA. The U.K. Small Aneurysm Trial Detection and Management Trial
23
used ultrasonographic monitor-
22
and the Aneurysm
ing to determine the time of surgical repair in the group of patients randomized to surveillance. More recently, in the Comparison of Surveillance versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR) trial, which compared early endovascular repair to watchful waiting, ultrasonographic monitoring was used simi­larly for monitoring.
24
In the absence of any clinical data suggest­ing the inadequacy of ultrasound, it remains the primary tool for diagnosis and follow-up.
Postoperatively, ultrasound can evaluate important ongoing clin­ical issues including perianeurysm aortic size and anastomotic aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm formation. Currently, duplex ultra­sonography is not the ideal imaging test following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Its sensitivity and specificity are less than computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for a variety of problems encountered after endovascular aortic stent grafting (e.g., endoleaks, device migration, thrombosis), so it should not be used as the primary method of follow-up.25 Improvements in technique, including contrast agents and three-dimensional (3D) imaging, are currently in development and likely will improve ultra­sound's accuracy to diagnose complications of endografts. Indeed, recent data suggest that ultrasonography may be approach­ing acceptability for EVAR follow-up.
29
In a prospective study, 108
26–28
patients underwent color Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, CTA, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for follow-up after EVAR. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonog­raphy demonstrated accuracy similar to CTA and MRA, while all three were superior to color Doppler ultrasonography.
30
Ultrasound can also be employed to diagnose and moni­tor TAA. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTA) visualizes the aortic root and a portion of the ascending aorta. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images much of the thoracic aorta well,
FIGURE 383 A, Transverse B-mode ultrasound image of widest portion of abdominal aorta. Electronic calipers have been applied and demonstrate a
5.6-cm transverse diameter and 5.2-cm anteroposterior diameter. B, Sagittal view of same vessel demonstrating transition from normal to aneurysmal aorta.