Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3608_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
83 Мб
Скачать
454
thoracic false lumen is converted to a long, inverted cul-de-sac, or blind pouch. Then with flap pulsation limited by the buttressing stent, blood in the false lumen becomes stagnant and prone to thrombosis.
30–32
False lumen thrombosis is critical because the precise rupture
point in any individual patient is frequently unknown, and the
CH
breech may exist well below the entry tear. Simple coverage of
36
the proximal entry may then eliminate direct flow into the false lumen, but if distal retrograde flow from abdominal sources per­sists, the risk of a continued leak exists and morbidity remains. Although this strategy is associated with considerable mortality and procedural complications, it represents an addition to the existing treatment armamentarium.
Other Indications for Aortic Endografts
The question of unidentified patient subgroup(s) who present with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection who may ben­efit from endograft placement remains. Some investigators have identified certain high-risk features in patients with acute uncom­plicated type B dissection that may portend an increased risk of early aneurysm formation and increased mortality. These features include measurements of various aortic dimensions at the time of initial diagnosis. Initial attempts to propose high-risk criteria from CT imaging considered descriptive features associated with a poor prognosis and disease progression, such as a patent false lumen, a gaping and circumferential entry tear with resultant small true lumen, and a dominant false lumen with early fusiform expan­sion of the proximal descending aorta within 3 months of initial symptoms.
Marui et al. proposed that patients with uncomplicated aortic dissection and transaortic diameter greater than 40 mm were at high risk of rapid aortic expansion.36 When applied to larger groups of patients with dissection, this benchmark provided modest prog­nostic value. The poor results encouraged others to focus on the issues and pursue more in-depth imaging analysis. Thereafter, Marui et al. offered an improved prognostic factor that was based on the extent of proximal descending aorta dilation at the time of initial diagnosis maximum transaortic diameter of the distal aortic arch divided by the sum of the minimum diameter of the proximal aortic arch plus the aortic diameter at the level of the pulmonary artery. A value greater than 0.64 anticipates late aortic events in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. The investigators recom­mended that patients with these predictors should undergo early intervention with open surgery or stent graft implantation.
Immer et al. analyzed imaging studies (CT or MRI) over the initial 18 months after diagnosis in 84 patients with acute type A aortic dissection. the time of the initial diagnostic scan is the strongest predictor of subsequent downstream aortic enlargement. This was especially true if the true lumen was less than 30% of the overall transaortic area 6 months after aortic surgery for repair of type A dissection.
This concept of the initial false lumen diameter as a determinant of late clinical deterioration was evaluated for type B disease in 2007 by Song et al.39 These authors studied 100 consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection, including 51 with type A dissection and 49 with type B dissection. Over half of the patients underwent CT imaging follow-up through 24 months. Of these, an aneurysm (diame­ter >
60 mm) was diagnosed in 28%, with the maximal aortic diameter located in the proximal descending segment. A greater than 22-mm initial false lumen diameter of the upper thoracic segment of the descending aorta predicted late aneurysm formation with a sensi­tivity of 100% and a sensitivity of 76%. The 42 patients with an initial false lumen diameter greater than 22 mm had a higher event rate than the 58 with smaller false lumen aortic diameters (aneurysm, 42% vs. 5%; or death, 12% vs. 5%).
More recently, another predictive feature for early compli­cation and clinical deterioration was described by Tsai et al. after reviewing data from the International Registry of Aortic
37
: the fusiform index. This index is defined as the
38
They concluded that a large false lumen at
Dissection (IRAD).
40
They reviewed 201 cases of type B acute aortic dissection. During the index hospitalization, 114 patients (56.7%) had a patent false lumen, 68 patients (33.8%) had par­tial thrombosis of the false lumen, and 19 (9.5%) had complete thrombosis of the false lumen. The mean 3-year mortality rate for patients with a patent false lumen was 13.7%, for those with par­tial thrombosis was 31.6%, and for those with complete thrombo­sis was 22.6%. Although postdischarge mortality was high among patients with acute type B aortic dissection, partial thrombosis, as compared with complete patency, is a significant independent predictor of postdischarge mortality (relative risk, 2.69; 95% confi­dence interval [CI], 1.45-4.98; P = 0.002).
In the future, it is likely that more sophisticated analysis will iden­tify additional factors beyond simple dimensional aortic measure­ments to better predict patients with acute type B aortic dissection who are at increased risk of disease progression, rapid deteriora­tion, or acute rupture. As prognostic evaluation of aortic dissection improves, the use of endovascular approaches will better target and improve outcomes of this disease.
REFERENCES
1. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C, et al: Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection, Eur
Heart J 22:1642–1681, 2001.
2. Glower DD, Speier RH, White WD, et al: Management and long-term outcome of aortic
dissection, Ann Surg 214:21–41, 1991.
3. Wong DR, Lemaire SA, Coselli JS: Managing dissections of the thoracic aorta, Am Surg
74:364–380, 2008.
4. Dake MD, Kato N, Mitchell RS, et al: Endovascular stent graft placement for the treatment of
acute aortic dissection, N Engl J Med 340:1546–1552, 1999.
5. Neinaber CA, Fattori R, Lund G, et al: Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic
dissection by stent-graft placement, N Engl J Med 340:1539–1545, 1999.
6. Mukherjee D, Eafle KA: Aortic dissection–an update, Curr Probl Cardiol 30:287–325, 2005.
7. Parker JD, Golledge J: Outcome of endovascular treatment of acute type B aortic dissection,
Ann Thorac Surg 86:1707–1712, 2008.
8. Fattori R, Botta L, Lovato L, et al: Malperfusion syndrome in type B aortic dissection: role of
the endovascular procedures, Acta Chir Belg 108:192–197, 2008.
9. Patel HJ, Williams DM, Meekov M, et al: Long-term results of percutaneous management of
malperfusion in acute type B aortic dissection: implications for thoracic aortic endovascular repair, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:300–308, 2009.
10. Czermak BV, Waldenberger P, Fraedrich G, et al: Treatment of Stanford type B aortic
dissection with stent grafts: preliminary results, Radiology 217:544–550, 2000.
11. Feezor RJ, Martin TD, Hess PJ, et al: Early outcomes after endovascular management of
acute, complicated type B aortic dissection, J Vasc Surg 49:561–566, 2009.
12. Pearce BJ, Passman MA, Patterson MA, et al: Early outcomes of thoracic endovascular stent-
graft repair for acute complicated type B dissections using the gore TAG endoprosthesis, Ann Vasc Surg 22:742–749, 2008.
13. Parsa CJ, Schroder JN, Daneshmand MA, et al: Midterm results for endovascular repair of
complicated acute and chronic type B aortic dissection, Ann Thorac Surg 89:97–104, 2010.
14. Oderich GS, Panneton JM, Bower TC, et al: Aortic dissection with aortic side branch
compromise: impact of malperfusion on patient outcome, Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 20:190–200, 2008.
15. Apostolakis E, Baikoussis NG, Georgiopoulos M: Acute type-B aortic dissection: the
treatment strategy, Hellenic J Cardiol 51:338–347, 2010.
16. Williams DM, Lee DY, Hamilton BH, et al: The dissected aorta: part III. Anatomy and
radiological diagnosis of branch-vessel compromise, Radiology 203:37–44, 1997.
17. Williams DM, Lee DY, Hamilton BH, et al: The dissected aorta: percutaneous treatment of
ischemic complications-principles and results, J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:605–625, 1997.
18. Shiiya N, Matsuzaki K, Kunihara T, et al: Management of vital organ malperfusion in acute
aortic dissection: proposal of a mechanism-specific approach, Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 55:85–90, 2007.
19. Deeb GM, Patel HJ, Williams DM: Treatment for malperfusion syndrome in acute type A and
B aortic dissection: a long-term analysis, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:98–100, 2010.
20. Kische S, Ehrlich MP, Nienaber CA, et al: Endovascular treatment of acute and chronic
aortic dissection: midterm results from the talent thoracic retrospective registry, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:115–124, 2009.
21. Fattori R, Tsai TT, Myrmel T, et al: Complicated acute type B dissection: is surgery still the
best option?: a report from the international registry of acute aortic dissection, JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1:395–402, 2008.
22. Tefera G, Acher CW, Hoch JR, et al: Effectiveness of intensive medical therapy in type B
aortic dissection: a single-center experience, J Vasc Surg 45:1114–1118, 2007.
23. Estrera AL, Miller CC, Safi HJ, et al: Outcomes of medical management of acute type B aortic
dissection, Circulation 114:384–389, 2006.
24. Giersson A, Szeto WY, Pochettino A, et al: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:255–262, 2007.
25. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al: The international registry of acute aortic
dissection (IRAD): new insight into an old disease, JAMA 283:897–903, 2000.
26. Trimarchi S, Eagle KA, Neinaber CA, et al: Importance of refractory pain and hypertension
in acute type B aortic dissection: insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD), Circulation 122:1283–1289, 2010.
27. Slonim SM, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, et al: Percutaneous balloon fenestration and stenting for
life-threatening ischemic complications in patients with acute aortic dissections, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:1118–1127, 1999.
28. Xenos ES, Minion DJ, Davenport DL, et al: Endovascular versus open repair for descending
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
thoracic aortic rupture: institutional experience and meta-analysis, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:282–286, 2009.
29. Patel HJ, Williams DM, Upchurch GR, et al: A comparative analysis of open and endovascular repair for the ruptured descending thoracic aorta, J Vasc Surg 50:1265–1270, 2009.
30. Resch TA, Delle M, Falkenberg M, et al: Remodeling of the thoracic aorta after stent grafting of type B dissection: a Swedish multicenter study, J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:503–508, 2006.
31. Kusagawa H, Shimono T, Ishida M, et al: Changes in false lumen after transluminal stent-graft placement in aortic dissections: six years’ experience, Circulation 111:2951–2957, 2005.
32. Sayer D, Bratby M, Brooks M, et al: Aortic morphology following endovascular repair of acute and chronic type B aortic dissection: implications for management, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:522–529, 2008.
33. Tsai TT, Fattori R, Trimarchi S, et al: Long-term survival in patients presenting with type B acute aortic dissection: insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissections, Circulation 114:2226–2231, 2006.
34. Nienaber CA, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, et al: Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection. The Investigation of Stent Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial, Circulation 120:2519–2528, 2009.
35. Nienaber CA, Kische S, Akin I, et al: Strategies for subacute/chronic type B aortic dissection: the Investigation of Stent Grafts in Patients with Type B Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial 1-year outcome, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:101–108, 2010.
36. Marui A, Mochizuki T, Mitsui N, et al: Toward the best treatment for uncomplicated patients with type B acute aortic dissection: a consideration for sound surgical indication, Circulation 100(Suppl II):II-275–II-280, 1999.
37. Marui A, Mochizuki T, Koyama T, et al: Degree of fusiform dilation of the proximal descending aorta in type B acute aortic dissection can predict late events, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:1163–1170, 2007.
38. Immer F, Krahenbuhl E, Hagan U, et al: Large area of false lumen favors secondary dilation of the aorta after acute type A aortic dissection, Circulation 112(Suppl I):I-249–I-252,
2005.
39. Song JM, Kim JH, Kang DH, et al: Long-term predictors of descending aorta aneurismal change in patients with aortic dissection, J Am Coll Cardiol 50:799–804, 2007.
40. Tsai TT, Evangelista A, Nienaber CA, et al: Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection, N Engl J Med 357:349–359, 2007.
455
CH 36
EndovAsCulAR THERAPy foR AoRTiC dissECTion
PA RT X
AORTIC ANEURYSM
CHAPTER
37 Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and
Prognosis of Aortic Aneurysms
Reena L. Pande, Joshua A. Beckman
Aortic aneurysms result in significant morbidity and mortality, accounting for nearly 13,000 deaths and 55,000 hospital discharges per year in the United States. part of the aorta from the aortic root down to the abdominal aorta, the prognosis and outcome in patients with aortic aneurysms vary based on location and underlying etiology. Timely and appropri­ate intervention may improve the natural history of the disease process. This chapter reviews the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and prognosis of aortic aneurysms.
The Normal Aorta
Like other arterial structures, the aorta is composed of three layers: tunica intima, tunica media, and adventitia. The innermost surface of the tunica intima is lined by a single-cell-thick layer of endothelial cells (ECs). The intima is bound by the internal elastic lamina. The tunica media is composed of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), collagen, fibroblasts, elastin fibers, and ground sub­stance, which together control the degree of vessel constriction and vasodilation. The presence of elastin fibers in the media defines the aorta as an elastic artery and provides the tensile strength that permits the aorta to withstand pulsatile delivery of blood from the heart. Elastin content gradually decreases with distance from the heart. a thin layer that contains connective tissue, fibroblasts, and the nutritive vasa vasorum.
Definition of Aortic Aneurysm
In adults, the normal diameter of the aorta is approximately 3 cm at the origin, 2.5 cm in the descending thoracic aorta, and 1.8 to 2 cm in the abdominal aorta. Aortic aneurysm is defined as a max­imal aortic dimension greater than 3.0 cm, or a 50% increase in size compared with the normal segment proximal to the aneu­rysm. Mild expansion that does not meet these criteria may be referred to as aortic ectasia. True aneurysms are classified into two major groups on the basis of morphology: (1) fusiform ( and 37-3), defined as a circumferential expansion of the aorta, and (2) saccular, representing a focal outpouching of a segment of the aorta (
Fig. 37-4). Fusiform aneurysms are the most common mani-
festation. In contrast to true aneurysms, which involve expansion of all three layers of the aortic wall, a pseudoaneurysm, also known
1
Although aneurysms may affect any
2
The outermost layer, the adventitia, is
Figs. 37-2
as a false aneurysm, results from a disruption of the aortic wall and essentially represents a contained rupture of the aorta.
Pathophysiology of Aortic Aneurysms
A wide variety of pathological states are associated with aortic aneurysms ( ited disorders, infections, inflammatory conditions (i.e., vasculitis), and trauma. Specific disorders associated with aortic aneurysms are discussed later in this chapter. Important determinants of aortic aneurysm formation include inflammation, proteolysis of the struc­tural components of the aortic wall, and abnormal biomechanical forces ogy of aneurysm formation is critical not only for prevention of initial aneurysm formation but also for limiting aneurysm growth and expansion.
Traditionally, pathological aortic aneurysm formation was ascribed to a process akin to atherogenesis. Although advances in basic and clinical investigation in both lesion types have revealed some common themes, newer studies suggest that aneurysm for­mation is fundamentally different from atherosclerosis. Preferential weakening of the adventitia and media—rather than an intimal proliferative process, as in atherosclerosis—results in diminished aortic resilience and tensile strength, culminating in aortic wall thinning, dilation, and increased wall stress, all of which may result in rupture. Although atherosclerotic changes may be seen in the wall of aneurysms, these changes may be a consequence of local turbulent flow as opposed to a cause of aneurysm formation. Moreover, the degree of systemic atherosclerosis does not correlate well with the degree of aneurysm formation.
Development of aneurysms is associated with loss of two critical structural elements in the aortic wall: elastin and collagen. Elastin provides radial and longitudinal support, enabling the aorta to respond to pulsatile flow while maintaining normal arterial dimen­sions. The importance of elastin in maintaining aortic structure is highlighted by animal models where elastase infusion results in elastin breakdown and experimental aortic aneurysm formation. However, breakdown of elastin alone appears insufficient to cause aneurysmal expansion and rupture. Loss of collagen, another important structural element, is an additional contributor, and the relative balance of elastin and collagen deposition, among other factors, may be critical for determining aneurysm formation. Early in aneurysm formation, the aorta compensates for loss of elastin by increasing production of collagen, tent decreases, collagen (as the major source of tensile strength) is overwhelmed, and aortic expansion occurs. This is exacerbated by up-regulation of collagenases, resulting in further collagen degradation as described later.9 Structural changes in each layer of the aortic wall develop that together promote aortic stiffness. As a consequence, decrease in the vessel's ability to distend nor­mally with left ventricular (LV) contraction, weakening of the
Box 37-1). These include degenerative diseases, inher-
3
(see Fig. 37-2). Understanding the underlying pathophysiol-
6
8
but as elastin con-
4,5
7
8
457
458
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
CH
37
FIGURE 371 Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the thoracic aorta. Note the different aortic segments: ascending aorta, aortic arch, and
descending aorta. Left subclavian artery separates the aortic arch from the descending aorta.
FIGURE 372 Three pathophysiological mechanisms that best characterize the process of aneurysm formation. Aortic aneurysm
specimens reveal increases in leukocyte infiltration, cytokine concentration, and leukocyte adhesion molecules. Both elastin-related and collagen­related autoantigens have been identified and may participate in initiation of process. Once process has begun, proteolytic enzymes, particularly matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9, increase in concentration and break down elastin and collagen. Increases in enzyme coactivators (e.g., urokinase plasminogen activator [uPA], tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]) further augment matrix breakdown. Increase in proteolysis is not accompanied by change in inhibitors of process, yielding a degenerative environment. Abdominal aorta is predisposed to aneurysm formation because of adverse blood flow patterns and its relative lack of elastin and vascular smooth muscle compared with thoracic aorta. (Volume-rendered computed tomography image of
abdominal aortic aneurysm used with permission of Joseph Schoepf, MD.)
FIGURE 373 Computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) of ascending aortic aneurysm. Notice that proximal descending portion of aorta is ectatic
as well. Aneurysm involves entire circumference of aorta and is thus fusiform. Normal ascending aorta size is less than 3 cm.
vessel wall, and increase in the tendency for dilation and ecta­sia follow.
10
Some of the changes in aortic structure that promote aneurysm formation may arise as a result of the normal aging pro­cess. With normal aging, aortic stiffness due to fragmentation of elastin fibers, deposition of glycosaminoglycans, fibronectin (FN), and collagen, and reduced bioavailability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) occurs.
11–14
FIGURE 374 Maximal intensity projection (MIP) of magnetic resonance (MR) image of saccular aneurysm. Note outpouching of an
otherwise normal descending aorta (arrow). This pattern of aneurysm is more common in infectious aneurysms.
Box 37-1 Disorders Associated with
Aortic Aneurysms
Degenerative
Cystic medial necrosis Aortic dissection
Developmental
Marfan's syndrome (MFS) Loeys-Dietz's syndrome Ehlers-Danlos' syndrome (EDS) Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) Turner's syndrome Aortic coarctation
Infectious
Tuberculosis Syphilis
Staphylococcus Salmonella
Vasculitis
Takayasu's arteritis (TA) Giant cell arteritis (GCA) Behçet's disease Rheumatoid arthritis Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Sarcoidosis Ankylosing spondylitis Reiter's syndrome Relapsing polychondritis Cogan's syndrome
Trauma
Pathophysiologically, the major determinants of aortic aneu­rysm formation include proteolysis of the structural components of the aortic wall, inflammation, and abnormal biomechanical
3
forces
(see Fig. 37-2). Pathology of aortic aneurysms varies in different segments of the aorta and in different predisposing dis­eases. Frequently observed histological features include cystic medial necrosis, mucoid infiltration, and cyst formation in the setting of elastin necrosis and vascular smooth muscle apopto­sis. In patients with Marfan's syndrome (MFS), bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), or Turner's syndrome, cystic medial necrosis is a common feature, but in contrast, inflammation is less prominent than in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
15,16
On the other hand, cystic medial necrosis is less likely to be observed in AAAs. Instead, AAAs typically have disrupted elastin fibers, inflamma­tion, greater vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis, and deficient glycosaminoglycan production.
17
Elastin fragmentation occurs adjacent to the inflammatory cells. Despite differences in pathophysiology due to location and underlying etiology, forma­tion of all aortic aneurysms involves to some degree the pro­cesses described in the following discussions (i.e., proteolytic degradation, inflammation, changes in biomechanical forces) that together facilitate aneurysm formation.
Proteolytic Degradation
Several proteolytic enzymes contribute to degradation of structural components of the arterial wall, ultimately increasing risk of aneu­rysm formation. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are endopepti­dases that degrade one or more components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Thus far, several classes of MMPs, comprising nearly 30 individual proteinases, have been characterized. They include collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, matrilysins, membrane-type (MT)-MMPs, and other MMPs. MMPs may be activated both intracellularly and extracellularly, and may be secreted by endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, or adventitial fibroblasts. Extracellular regulation of activation may occur as a result of an MMP–MT-MMP interaction or via interaction
18
Typically produced as proenzymes,
with plasmin or reactive oxygen species (ROS). of MMPs are the tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) and plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI) 1 and 2.
Increased local production of MMPs in aortic aneurysms was
first reported nearly 20 years ago.
22–24
19–21
The inhibitors
18
Although elevations of several MMPs have been noted, MMP-1 (collagenase) and MMP-3 (stromelysin), MMP-2 (gelatinase A), and MMP-9 (gelatinase B) represent the principal proteinases in aortic aneurysms that result in elastin and collagen degradation.
25,26
MMP-2 and MMP-9 gelati­nases specifically break down collagen. They are synthesized by local cells in the aortic wall, including infiltrating macrophages and resident aortic VSMCs. adventitia near the vasa vasorum, localizing to infiltrating macro-
29
phages.
MMP-2 is synthesized constitutively by VSMCs30 but can
also be synthesized by infiltrating leukocytes.
27,28
MMP-9 is typically found in the
31
Interestingly, MMP-2 production is increased in the vasculature remote from the aorta, suggesting a systemic underlying disease process that manifests with aortic aneurysmal disease.
32
The centrality of these enzymes in aneurysm formation is sup­ported by several lines of evidence. Studies have demonstrated that MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels are higher in tissue obtained from aortic aneurysms than in atherosclerotic plaque or normal arte­rial tissue. not form aortic aneurysms in experimental models. competent macrophages from wild-type mice into MMP-9 knock­out mice enables aneurysm formation.
30,31
Furthermore, MMP-9 and MMP-2 knockout mice do
33
In addition, elevated lev-
33
Reinfusion of
els of MMP-1, MMP-8 (a neutrophil collagenase), and MMP-9 have been associated with aneurysm rupture, and levels of these MMPs may vary with aneurysm size. less clear for MMP-2.
37–40
34–36
Relationship to aneurysm size is
Elevated levels of other proteolytic enzymes such as human macrophage metalloelastase (MMP-12) and membrane type-1 metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) have also been demonstrated in aortic aneurysms.
41
Expression of MMP-12 is increased in aortic aneurysms as a result of macrophage infiltration. However, the relevance of MMP-12 to aneurysm formation is less clear, based on the finding that MMP-12 knockout mice are not completely protected from aneurysm formation.42 MT1-MMP, a collagenase produced by macrophages and increased in aortic aneurysms, likely has its greatest effect as an activator of the proenzyme form of MMP-2.
43,44
In addition to increased expression of MMPs, aneurysm forma­tion is associated with abnormal regulation of MMP levels in tissues. Matrix metalloproteinase levels are increased in states of inflam­mation and oxidant stress, both known to play a role in aneurysm formation. Compared with nonaneurysmal sections of aorta, super­oxide anion and markers of oxidative stress are increased in aneu­rysmal segments, and ROS can convert proenzymes of MMPs to their active form.
45–47
In addition, MMP levels can be augmented by plasminogen activators, such as urokinase-type plasminogen acti­vator (uPA) and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), which are specific physiological regulators of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activation and overexpressed in aortic aneurysms but not in healthy aortic specimens.
48
Matrix metalloproteinase levels are also normally regulated by TIMPs. Although early work reported decreased concentra­tions of TIMPs in aneurysmal tissue, less clear, showing no difference in certain TIMP levels between aneurysmal and healthy aortic tissue. imbalance in MMPs to TIMPs may be the more relevant factor.
49
more recent data have been
36,43,50,51
However, the relative
41
52
but TIMP knockout mice have increased MMP activ-
53
Similarly, lower expression
49,54
Increased expression of plas­minogen activators without reciprocal changes in their inhibitors alters the balance toward fibrinolysis, MMP activation, and tis­sue degradation. Experimental overexpression of PAI-1 prevents
459
CH 37
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PROGNOSIS OF AORTIC ANEURYSMS
460
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
aneurysm formation in a rat model of aortic aneurysm,55 confirm­ing the importance of relative rather than absolute concentrations.
The contribution of MMPs to the pathophysiology of aortic aneurysms is highlighted by the beneficial effect of medications known to reduce MMP levels on aneurysm expansion. For exam­ple, tetracyclines (e.g., doxycycline) have long been recognized
CH
as generalized inhibitors of metalloproteinases.56 Their poten-
37
tial value in aortic aneurysmal disease has been demonstrated in both organ culture and rodent models of aneurysm forma-
36,57–59
tion.
In humans, doxycycline limits the activity of both MMP-2 and MMP-9 in aortic wall specimens, both by reducing macrophage MMP-9 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expres­sion and diminishing activation of the proenzyme form of MMP-
60–62
2.
In a few small randomized phase 2 trials, doxycycline has
been shown to decrease aneurysm expansion rate.
63,64
these data await confirmation in larger trials, they do support the conceptual framework of the importance of proteolytic enzymes in aortic aneurysm formation and expansion.
By reducing levels of proteolytic enzymes, several other therapies may potentially be of therapeutic benefit in aneurysmal disease. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, or statins, have antianeurysm properties in experimental models by virtue of reducing oxidant stress and macrophage production of MMPs.
65–67
However, data
in humans have been inconsistent. A meta-analysis of five studies including 697 patients with small aortic aneurysms (<55 mm) treated with or without statins suggested that statin therapy was associated with lower rates of expansion.
68
On the other hand, other human studies have not shown a benefit of preoperative statin treat­ment on MMP or TIMP levels in aneurysm specimens, and no differ­ence in aneurysm expansion rate.
69–71
Indomethacin also appears to prevent aortic aneurysm formation in a rat model, mechanism may be related to inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) 2, prosta glandin E2 (PGE2), and reductions in MMP-9. PGE2 expression is up-regulated more than 30-fold in aortic aneurysms.76 Prostaglandin E2 localizes to infiltrating macrophages, and its expression is dependent on COX activity.77 Prostaglandin E2, through activation of interleukin (IL)-6, may increase VSMC apop­tosis, further weakening the structural elements of the aorta.
Inflammation
The contribution of inflammation to many pathological arte­rial processes has been well established.
80
Dent
reported mild chronic inflammation in 72.5% and mod­erate inflammation in 15.7% in 51 consecutively resected AAAs. Subsequently it was discovered that lymphocytes and macro­phages are found in greater quantity in the adventitia and media of AAAs than of atherosclerotic or normal aortas.81 In addition, surgical explant specimens from patients with aortic aneurysms demonstrated higher levels of adhesion molecules, including intra­cellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, than seen in atherosclerotic and normal aortas. Similarly, tissue levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-8, mono­cyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, interferon (IFN)-γ, and IL-6, have all been noted to be elevated in patients with aneurysms compared with control subjects.
82
Some studies have even sug­gested cytokine levels are higher in ruptured aortic aneurysms than in asymptomatic aortic aneurysms, been inconsistent.
84
Finally, other acute-phase proteins, including C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and ceruloplasmin, are also present at increased levels in plasma and in the vessel wall.
These inflammatory mediators largely derive from infiltrating macrophages, but lymphocytes and aortic ECs and SMCs also con­tribute to the inflammatory milieu. The presence of inflammation in aortic aneurysms is supported by positron emission tomographic imaging with
18
fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) showing greater FDG uptake in aneurysmal compared to nonaneurysmal aortic segments from matched control subjects, and by advanced mag­netic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques.
79
In 1981, Rose and
83
although the data have
88,89
Thus, immune cells
Although
72
and the
73–75
Indeed,
75,76,78
82,85–87
invade the aortic wall, become activated, and create an inflamma­tory environment that engages the activity of local stabilizing cells, initiating the process of elastin and collagen breakdown and aneu­rysm formation. However, the initial signals that drive inflammatory cell recruitment remain unclear. Animal studies with experimen­tal aneurysm models have confirmed the human studies and demonstrated that increased inflammation promotes aneurysm formation.
90
Given the contribution of inflammation to aortic aneurysms, it follows that strategies to reduce inflammation might reduce aneu­rysm formation or limit aneurysm growth. Indeed, as mentioned previously, some data suggest that statins, known to have benefi­cial antiinflammatory properties beyond their effect on choles­terol lowering, may limit aneurysm growth and expansion. Recent studies have also shown that limiting inflammation can reduce aneurysm formation in animal models.
93–97
Future studies
67,91,92
will be required to clarify whether strategies to target inflammation can prevent formation of aortic aneurysms or limit expansion in humans.
Increases in Biomechanical Wall Stress
The frequency of aneurysm formation in the abdominal aorta compared to other vascular locations suggests a predisposition in this area. Variations in biomechanical factors have been noted in the differing regions of the aorta. Relative deficiencies in struc­tural elements combined with adverse blood flow patterns predis­pose the abdominal aorta to aneurysm formation. Compensatory mechanisms occur after aneurysm formation have developed, but they do not stop the process. Thus, aneurysm expansion is pro­moted by an imbalance of biomechanical forces and compensa­tory mechanisms.
Several specific structural changes may predispose the abdom­inal aorta to aneurysm formation. For example, elastin within the aortic wall is organized into circumferential plates, or lamel­lae, that respond to the pulsatile load created by the heart. Each lamellar unit consists predominantly of two elastin bundles and vascular smooth muscle. However, deposition of elastin is not uni­form along the aorta, with the thoracic aorta incorporating 35 to 56 lamellar units compared to only 28 in the abdominal aorta. The abdominal aorta may therefore be more susceptible to elas­tin breakdown due to a relative increase in pressure withstood per lamellar unit, compared with the rest of the vessel. In addi­tion, the abdominal aorta has a decreased concentration of nutri­tive vasa vasorum compared to more proximal aortic segments. Reductions in aortic tissue perfusion stiffen the vessel, reducing compliance and ability to withstand pulsatile stress.
100
Vascular cells in the aorta attempt to restore elastin content in the setting of elastin degradation to compensate for reductions in tensile and radial strength. Human AAA samples show a four­to sixfold increase in tropoelastin protein compared with con­trol arteries.
101,126
Elastin is produced by SMCs and macrophages. In areas of macrophage infiltration, elastin deposition is not orga­nized into mature effective bundles. Indeed, compared with nor­mal specimens, aneurysm specimens have a ninefold reduction in desmosine, a marker for mature elastin cross-linking.
101
Thus, com­pensatory elastin replacement is disordered and does not improve aortic compliance.
Another factor that may make the abdominal segment of the aorta more prone to aneurysm formation is blood flow patterns specific to that segment. In experimental models, the infrarenal segment of the aorta is subject to much higher levels of oscillat­ing flow and reflected pressure waves compared with the supra­renal segment,
102
resulting in higher levels of aortic wall tension. Turbulence and pressure are exacerbated by the aneurysm's morphology, which promotes development of local vortices and turbulent flow patterns. aneurysm by placing an aortic endograft rapidly reduces plasma MMP-9 levels in patients.
103
Excluding these flow patterns from the
104,105
In a rodent elastase infusion model
of aortic aneurysm, flow conditions were examined by creating
98
99
4,106,107
106
Improved flow decreased aortic expansion by
In addition to adverse biomechanical forces creating an envi­ronment permissive for aneurysm formation, the role of intralumi­nal thrombus on wall stress and aneurysm expansion has recently been a focus of much study. Using finite element analysis in a three­dimensional (3D) model of the aorta derived from computed tomography (CT) scans, intraluminal thrombus was found to lower peak wall stress by up to 38% bus constituents.
109
Thrombus decreases transmission of luminal pressure to the aneurysm wall and may prevent aneurysm rup­ture by reducing wall strain. thrombus may also contribute to further aneurysm formation,
108
relatively independent of throm-
110–115
On the other hand, intraluminal
111
given that thrombus has been demonstrated to have higher levels of proteolytic enzymes and enzyme activators than the aneurysm
116
itself.
Intraluminal thrombus may act as a proteolytic enzyme res­ervoir through polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and enzyme accu­mulation provides a ready source of destructive elements for the adjacent aneurysm.
116
Understanding biomechanical factors may help improve assess­ment of risk of aneurysm growth and rupture above and beyond the predictive value of lumen diameter alone.
117
Several studies have used novel computational models to incorporate biomechanical factors such as wall stress, wall strength, and extent of intraluminal thrombus for assessment of abdominal aneurysms.
112,118–123
Some studies have suggested that assessment of wall stress, wall strength, and the ratio of wall stress to wall strength may be better predictors of rupture risk than diameter.
124,125
Epidemiology and Prognosis of Aortic Aneurysms
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Aortic aneurysms are typically defined as an increase in diameter of 50% compared to the adjacent normal segment of the aorta; the upper limit of normal for the abdominal aorta is 3 cm. The absolute size definition for AAA is preferable, given that body size and base­line diameter may vary on the basis of height, sex, weight, and pres­ence of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). However, all these factors should be taken into consideration when considering risk in any given individual.
PREVALENCE
The prevalence of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta has been determined on the basis of several large screening studies and autopsy series ( tive autopsies performed over 23 years, 1.97% of the subjects were found to have an AAA.
Table 37-1). In an early series of 24,000 consecu-
126
Of the 473 aneurysms found, 58% were
larger than 4 cm in diameter, nearly three quarters of the patients were men, and one fourth of the aneurysms had ruptured. More recent large screening programs in targeted populations have fur­ther evaluated the prevalence of AAA. The largest screening pro­gram performed was the Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Study Screening Program, which studied 126,196 veter­ans 50 to 79 years of age.
127
In this cohort of predominantly male American veterans, 3.6% of subjects had an infrarenal aortic dia­meter greater than 3 cm, and an AAA 4 cm or larger was found in 1.2%. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) also screened 27,147 of 33,830 invited men aged 65 to 74 and reported a 4.9% prevalence of AAA 3 cm or larger.
128
Several studies have demonstrated lower prevalence of AAA in women. The largest and most recent of these studies screened nearly 10,012 women (mean age, 69.6 years) and found an AAA prevalence rate of 0.7%, with only 4 of 74 detected aneurysms mea­suring larger than 5 cm.
129
These low prevalence rates were con­sistent with findings from earlier studies. Among 4237 subjects aged 65 to 80 who participated in a screening study among gen­eral practitioners in West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2290 women agreed to undergo abdominal ultrasonography.
130
Only 1.4% of the women had an AAA 3 cm or larger, and only 0.3% had an AAA 4 cm or larger. This dramatically lower prevalence in women has been confirmed in subsequent studies. In the Norwegian Tromso study, 2% of 2943 women aged 55 to 84 had an AAA 3 cm or larger, and 0.5% had an abdominal aneurysm 4 cm or larger. among female American veterans, the prevalence of an AAA 3 cm or larger was just 1%.
132
However, an increasing number of cardio­vascular risk factors does increase the risk of AAA in women, with a prevalence rate as high as 6.4% in this higher-risk group.
RISK FACTORS
Three risk factors predict the vast majority of AAAs: age, gender, and cigarette smoking. Aneurysms usually affect the elderly, seldom occurring in those younger than 60 years of age, and there is a clear increase in incidence with increasing age, even when limiting the studies to older individuals.
133–135
In a Norwegian population-based study of 6386 men and women aged 25 to 84, the incidence of AAA in men increased from 0% in those aged 25 to 44, to 6% in those aged 55 to 64, and to 18.5% in those aged 75 to 84.
131
Large North American epidemiological studies have demonstrated an increase in AAA risk ranging from 58% to 300% with each additional decade
136
of life. in all age groups, risk of AAA is two- to sixfold higher in men than women.
Gender is also an important predictor of AAA formation;
131,132,137–140
Cigarette smoking is the most potent modifi­able risk factor and increases the risk of AAA by 60% to 850%. In the ADAM study and the Edinburgh Artery Study, risk of an aneurysm increased threefold with any smoking history. of AAA development further increases with number of cigarettes smoked, duration of smoking, and lack of filtration, indicating a dose-response relationship.
149
In the Whitehall study of 18,403 male civil servants examined at age 40 to 64 years, aneurysm frequency increased from sixfold with manufactured cigarettes with filters to 25-fold with hand-rolled cigarettes.
150
Smoking cessation can
131
Finally,
129
127,148
141–147
Risk
461
CH 37
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PROGNOSIS OF AORTIC ANEURYSMS
TABLE 37-1 Prevalence of Aortic Aneurysm in Large Epidemiological Studies
AUTHOR NO. GENDER AGE YRS ANEURYSM FREQUENCY % NATION
Pleumeekers
127
Lederle
128
Ashton
131
Singh
132
Lederle
139
Scott
F, female; M, male.
137
5419 42% M >55 4.1 M, 0.7 F Netherlands
126,196 97% M 50-79 1.3 United States
27,147 M 65-74 4.9 United Kingdom
2998 F 25-84 2.2 Norway
3450 F 50-79 1.0 United States
9342 F 65-80 1.3 United Kingdom
462
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
reduce the risk of aneurysm formation, with former smokers hav­ing a lower AAA risk than current smokers.
Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in general (e.g., hyper­tension, hyperlipidemia) also increase the risk of AAA for­mation but are less potent risk factors than age, gender, and smoking.
CH
modest association of both hypertension and hyperlipidemia
37
with AAA. tionship with hypertension, to correlate best with diastolic blood pressure hypertensive medication. may be a greater risk factor for aneurysm rupture than for initial aneurysm formation. AAA is clear, although hyperlipidemia is a less potent risk factor than those mentioned previously.
127,136,152–154
155
In the REACH registry, there was a clear
Earlier studies had suggested a less consistent rela-
138,156
but aneurysm formation seems
140
Some data suggest that hypertension
158
The association between cholesterol and
135,137,159
increased 30% per 40 mg/dL total cholesterol in the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry cohort. cific components of the lipid profile, higher levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are both associated with aneurysm forma-
133,159
tion. of aneurysm formation,
Similarly, the presence of atherosclerosis increases risk
133,134,137
although as mentioned previously, aneurysm formation is likely a process distinct from atheroscle­rosis. In the ADAM study of more than 100,000 subjects, hyper­tension, elevated cholesterol, and presence of other vascular disease increased risk of aneurysm formation by 15%, 44%, and 66%, respectively.
127
In contrast, diabetes and black race appear protective against formation of an aneurysm. decreases risk of aneurysm formation by 30% to 50%.
A dramatic increase in frequency of AAA formation in relatives of patients with aortic aneurysm suggests a genetic component to the disease. Although cigarette smoking numerically accounts for the vast majority of AAAs in the population, risk factor for aneurysm formation is a history of aneurysm in a first-degree relative. Norgaard et al. dence of aneurysms in first-degree relatives of patients with AAA. In the ADAM study, a family history doubled the risk of AAA, but was reported in only 5.1% of more than 100,000 participants. Investigations specific to the impact of family history demon­strate a larger risk. Several studies have demonstrated that a fam­ily history of AAA increases the risk of AAA four- to fivefold. Family history of AAA was also related to earlier AAA formation and rupture by nearly a decade. fold higher in patients with a family history than in sporadic AAA patients. Frydman et al.
165
164
Rate of rupture was nearly four-
screened the siblings of 400 AAA patients and found an AAA in 43% of male siblings and 16% of female sib­lings. More specifically, the risk of AAA formation consistently rises above 20% for men older than 50 who have a first-degree relative with AAA.
161,166–169
Using segregation analysis, Majumder et al.
reported that the relative risk of developing an AAA is 3.97 and
4.03 with paternal and maternal history, respectively. Risk increases to nearly 10-fold with an affected male sibling and 23-fold when a female sibling is affected.
170
Twin studies further support a genetic component to AAA formation, with one study reporting an odds ratio (OR) of 71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-183) for mono­zygotic twins and 7.6 (95% CI, 3.0-19) for dizygotic twins.
Despite the wealth of data supporting a genetic component to AAA formation, no clear mode of inheritance and no single can­didate gene has been identified. Early studies suggested evidence of both sex-linked and autosomal dominant patterns of inheri­tance. Associations have been made with blood types, haptoglo­bin variations, α II (HLA-II) immune response genes.
-antitrypsin, and human leukocyte antigen class
1
genetic associations with AAA have appeared in the literature, including genes related to cardiovascular disease, inflammation, and related signaling pathways. One study suggested an associ­ation between reduced AAA growth and five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP4), as well as an allelic variant of TGFB3. showed no association between genetic polymorphisms in the
136,149,151
157
or use of an anti-
Risk of AAA formation
127,132,136,160
136
the most potent
161
identified an 18% inci-
172–174
More than 100 reports on
176
However, another study
138
For spe-
Diabetes
136,157
171
157,163
main receptors for TGF-β and AAA formation.
177
Two genome­wide association studies (GWAS) have suggested an association between AAA and a SNP located on chromosome 3p12.3 in a region near the gene CNTN3 for contactin-3, a lipid-anchored cell adhesion molecule.
178
Another GWAS in a population from Iceland and the Netherlands found a SNP on 9q33 associated with AAA with an OR of 1.21. The same SNP has been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), and pulmonary embolism (PE).
179
The SNP resides in the gene coding for DAB2IP, a gene encoding a cell growth and sur­vival inhibitor. In addition, the same gene variant associated with myocardial infarction (MI) at locus 9p21 has been associated with AAA. association between telomere length and AAA in a small cohort in the United Kingdom.
180,181
Finally, of interest but of unclear significance is the
182
This may represent the association of aging, telomere length, and aneurysm formation, but the direct pathophysiological link remains unclear.
PROGNOSIS
The natural history of AAA is one of silent coexistence and sudden lethal rupture. In a large autopsy study performed over a quarter of a century, one fourth of abdominal aneurysms were ruptured on postmortem examination.
126
The frequency of rupture was
dependent largely on size in this study population, ranging from
9.5% in aneurysms smaller than 4 cm to 45.6% in aneurysms 7.1 to 10 cm in diameter. In a comparison of patients with aortic aneu­rysms divided into two groups at a cutoff point of 6 cm, survival was markedly decreased in the patients with larger aneurysms. In a single-center study that included 60 AAA ruptures over a 30-year period, only 2 occurred in patients with an aneurysm diameter smaller than 5 cm.
184
Similarly, in a study in Rochester, Minnesota, no ruptures occurred in aneurysms smaller than 5 cm, whereas rupture occurred in 25% of AAAs larger than 5 cm. In 198 patients with aneurysms 5.5 cm in diameter or larger, but who were deemed too risky for surgery, 23% had presumed rup­ture over a mean follow-up of 1.6 years.
162
64% are observed in patients who present with a ruptured aortic aneurysm.
187
186
Mortality rates as high as
On the basis of these data, two large trials have been conducted to determine whether early recognition and treatment can alter the natural history of AAA. The U.K. Small Aneurysm Trial randomized 1090 patients aged 60 to 76 years with asymptomatic AAAs 4 to 5.5 cm in diameter to undergo early elective open surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance.
188
In the surveillance
group, surgery was performed when the aneurysm reached
5.5 cm. Early surgery did not affect overall mortality. At 3 years, nearly 20% of both groups had died, although abdominal
170
aneurysms accounted for only a quarter of the deaths in both groups. Cardiovascular mortality unrelated to the aneurysm accounted for 40% of total mortality, and cancer caused slightly more than 20% of the deaths. In a similar study performed by the U.S. Veterans Administration, 1136 subjects aged 50 to 79 years with asymptomatic AAA 4 to 5.5 cm in diameter were randomized to undergo either early elective open surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance
153
(Fig. 37-5). After 5 years, there was no significant difference in survival between the groups, each with a near 25% mortality rate. In this study, aneurysm-related deaths accounted for only 3% of total mortality. More recently, the PIVOTAL study demonstrated no difference between surveillance and early endovascular repair in patients with small aneurysms (measuring 4-5 cm), and no difference in aneurysm-related death in the two groups after 3 years of follow-up.
175
that early repair of small aneurysms does not alter outcomes.
189
Together, these data suggest
Several factors can predict the likelihood of expansion and rup­ture of AAAs and can help identify which patients require inter­vention. The factor most predictive of rupture is initial size of the aneurysm. In one study of patients too ill for surgery, aneurysm rupture rates ranged from 9.4% for AAA of 5.5 to 5.9 cm to 32.5% for AAA of 7 cm or more.
186
In the U. K. Small Aneurysm Study, rate
183
185
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
Cumulative survival
0.2
0.1
0
0
No at risk
Surveillance Immediate repair
FIGURE 375 Survival curves in early surgery group compared with ultrasound surveillance group in Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. No significant difference in
mortality was found between the two groups. (From Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al: Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 346:1437, 2002.)
567 569
552 545
Immediate-repair group
Year of study
513
530
502
526
153
of rupture was 0.9% in aneurysms 3 to 3.9 cm, 2.7% in aneurysms 4 to 5.5 cm, and 27.8% in aneurysms 5.6 cm and larger.
Surveillance group
274 264
183 172
393 383
158
aneurysm size also predicted a more rapid increase in diameter. Similar to factors that predispose to initial development of AAA, cigarette smoking and higher blood pressure increase the risks of rapid expansion and rupture. In contrast to the decreased risk of AAA development in women, being female actually increases risk of rupture and death after rupture in those with established
158,191,192
AAA. threefold higher risk of AAA rupture than men.
In the U.K. Small Aneurysm Study, women had a
158
As mentioned previously, some have advocated use of biomechanical factors (wall stress, wall strength) to help with risk prediction. Prospective studies will be required to determine whether these factors can improve assessment of patients at high risk for aneurysm rupture and can improve selection of patients for aneurysm repair.
Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms
PREVALENCE
196
63 individuals (0.14%) had died of a ruptured TAA. The relative infrequency of TAA is confirmed by a retrospective analy­sis in Rochester, Minnesota. 45,000 residents, 72 (0.16%) were diagnosed with a TAA; 61% were women, and 67 patients had thoracic aortic involvement only. Most studies, however, suggest that men are twice as likely to develop a TAA as women. aneurysms occur even more infrequently. Of the 44,332 people to undergo necropsy in Malmo, Sweden, a mere 10 had TAAA.
195
In autopsy records reported
Of the 44,332 autopsies performed,
197
Over 30 years, of approximately
197,198
Thoracoabdominal aortic
87654321
76 67
Larger
190
193
193,194
196
In the Rochester, Minnesota, experience the incidence was 0.37 per 100,000 person-years of follow-up.
197
Because of the relatively small sample sizes reported in the literature, risk factors for TAAA development are less well defined. Risk factors currently associ­ated with development of TAAA include smoking, hypertension, and atherosclerotic vascular disease.
193
ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Aneurysms involving the thoracic aorta commonly develop as a result of cystic medial necrosis, a degenerative process that histo­logically involves degeneration of elastic fibers and SMCs. Cystic medial degeneration can arise as an isolated abnormality or as a result of an underlying connective tissue disease, such as MFS or Ehlers-Danlos' syndrome (EDS). Degeneration of the media within the arterial wall results in impaired structural integrity of the aorta, leading to eventual aortic dilation, aneurysm formation, and risk of rupture.
As with AAA, age is a significant risk factor for development of TAA; median age for presentation varies from 64 to 69 years. Cystic medial necrosis develops to some degree as a natural consequence of aging and may be accelerated by comorbid conditions such as hypertension.
199
Although a degenerative aneurysmal process is found in the majority of patients with TAAA, several other etiologies should be considered, including inher­ited collagen vascular disorders (e.g., MFS), BAV disease, aortic dissection, infection, and vasculitis (e.g., giant cell or Takayasu's arteritis). Rarer causes of TAA include coarctation of the aorta and trauma. Finally, some aneurysms develop because of a famil­ial predisposition termed familial thoracic aortic syndrome.
NATURAL HISTORY AND PROGNOSIS
The natural history and prognosis for TAAs and TAAAs remain poor but not completely defined, in part because modern imaging tech­niques now allow for early detection and intervention of aneu­rysm before rupture, and because the natural history is dependent in large part on underlying etiology. However, in a study accumu­lated over 25 years that followed 94 patients with TAAAs who did not undergo operative repair, 76% died within 2 years of follow-up, with half of the deaths resulting from aneurysm rupture. recent experience with 57 TAAA patients managed without oper­ation revealed a 69% 2-year survival, with aneurysm rupture as the cause of death in 19%. expansion and rupture include smoking, chronic obstructive pul­monary disease (COPD), and renal insufficiency.
201
Features associated with aneurysm
202
Dissection as an underlying cause of aneurysm formation is also associated with a greater risk of rupture compared with degenerative causes. Extension of a TAA into the abdomen is associated with a 50% rela­tive increase in risk of rupture, compared with those limited to the thoracic aorta alone.
204
The natural history of TAA depends in large part on rate of expan­sion. Initial aneurysm size at the time of diagnosis is the most important predictor of thoracic aneurysm growth. data have suggested that the mean rate of growth of thoracic aneu­rysms averages 0.1 cm/yr. rate of growth. Growth rate is increased in the setting of an aortic dis-
205
Several factors also contribute to the
section. In one study, presence of a chronic aortic dissection was associated with a 0.37 cm/yr rate of growth.
193
Longitudinal
205
Descending TAAs tend to increase in size more rapidly than ascending TAAs. Those who smoke have a twofold increased rate of growth over nonsmokers.
Survival rates for TAA range from 39% to 87% at 1 year and from
13% to 46% at 5 years.
207
201,207,208
In a study of 67 patients with TAA (mean age, 65 years), those with an aortic diameter less than 5 cm had a 90% 3-year survival rate, compared to 60% for patients with a TAA larger than 5 cm. with TAAs 6 cm or larger had a higher mortality rate than those with smaller aneurysms. is recommended when the aneurysm reaches 5.5 cm or greater in the ascending aorta.
207
Similarly, in two other studies, patients
206
Based on these data, referral for surgery
209
200
A more
205,206
463
CH 37
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PROGNOSIS OF AORTIC ANEURYSMS
193
203
464
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
However, several factors increase risk of aneurysm rupture and may prompt earlier referral for intervention. Guidelines rec­ommend that patients with MFS or other genetic disorders (e.g., vascular Ehlers-Danlos', Loeys-Dietz's, and Turner's syndromes, BAV disease, or familial aortic aneurysm) may require interven­tion at smaller diameters, such as 4.0 cm to 5.0 cm, depending
CH
on clinical circumstances.
37
rapid rate of growth than expected (i.e., increased risk of rupture and require repair at diameters less than 5.5 cm.
209
Finally, repair should be considered in patients with ascending aortic diameter greater than 4.5 cm if undergo­ing aortic valve surgery.
209
206,209–214
In addition, those with a more
0.5 cm/yr) may be at
For aneurysms involving the aortic arch, surgery should be considered when the diameter reaches 5.5 cm or greater. degenerative descending TAAs, repair is recommended when the diameter exceeds 5.5 cm, although in individuals with TAAAs or those with high surgical risk, elective surgery is recommended when the diameter exceeds 6.0 cm.
209
Other factors reported to significantly increase rate of rupture or need for surgery include older age, history of COPD, pain possibly related to the aneurysm, higher blood pressure, and extension of the aneurysm into the abdomen.
202,204
Inherited and Developmental Disorders
Marfan's Syndrome
Marfan's syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited disor­der of connective tissue arising from mutations in FBN1, a gene on chromosome 15 encoding the ECM protein fibrillin-1 (FBN1). Abnormalities in fibrillin synthesis may affect multiple tissues in patients with Marfan syndrome, including the cardiovascular, skeletal, and ocular systems. Excessive signaling through the TGF-β cascade has been suggested as a contributing factor. This is supported by experiments showing that TGF-β-neutralizing antibodies reverse aortic disease in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome, and by the demonstration that losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with anti-TGF-β properties, can partially reverse aortic wall defects in these mice. tions of MFS include ectopia lentis, hyperelasticity and ligamen­tous redundancy, valvular heart disease, and abnormalities in skin, fascia, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue.
However, potentially the most lethal complication in MFS is dis­ease of the ascending aorta resulting in aneurysm, dissection, and rupture. Dilation of the aortic root has been demonstrated early in childhood in patients with Marfan syndrome. Histologically, changes in the media seen in patients with MFS include cystic medial necrosis with fragmentation and disarray of elastic fibers, a paucity of smooth muscle cells, and separation of muscle fibers by collagen and glycosaminoglycans.
Ehlers-Danlos' Syndrome
Ehlers-Danlos' syndrome type 4 (vascular type) is a rare con­genital defect in the synthesis of type 3 collagen resulting from a mutation in the COL3A1 gene. ent with acrogeria (distinctive facial appearance), bruising, thin skin, and vascular or visceral rupture. Histological examination reveals a thinned, fragmented internal elastic lamina. deposition of glycosaminoglycans in the media of major arteries and intima of smaller arteries, with intimal thickening, has been
219
noted. stability or prevent formation of collagen, decreasing vascular wall stability.
Abnormalities in type 3 collagen fiber formation reduce
218
In a study of 199 patients with confirmed Ehlers­Danlos syndrome, 25% of patients suffered a ruptured vessel or vis­cus by age 20 and 80% by age 40. There were 131 deaths, 103 of which were due to vascular rup­ture. Complications of pregnancy caused the death of 15% of the women who became pregnant.
217
Patients with EDS typically pres-
220
215
Clinical manifesta-
216
Mean survival was 48 years.
209
218
Moreover,
For
Loeys-Dietz's Syndrome
Loeys-Dietz's syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition aris­ing from mutations in either the type I or type II receptor for TGF­β (TGFBR1 or TGFBR2). Individuals with Loeys-Dietz's syndrome have several characteristic features, including abnormal uvula, hypertelorism (increased space between the eyes), and arterial aneurysms, among other abnormalities, some of which are sim­ilar to Marfan syndrome.
214
The syndrome is characterized by particularly aggressive arterial disease manifested as aortic aneu­rysm with high risk of aortic dissection and rupture. As such, the average age of death of 26 years. Because of the high morbidity and mortality and the high rate of aortic dissection, even with aneurysms of less than 5.0 cm in size, early repair at smaller diam­eters is recommended.
209,214
Bicuspid Aortic Valve
Presence of a BAV increases the risk of ascending aortic aneurysm formation. dilation was a “post-stenotic” phenomenon arising secondary to abnormal flow through a diseased aortic valve, more recent data support the notion that aortic expansion occurs independently of valvular dysfunction, severity, age, and body size. dence that aortic dilation is not dependent on valve dysfunction is found in a study of 118 consecutive patients with BAV in whom the diameter of the ascending aorta was not correlated with sever­ity of aortic stenosis. can arise even when there is no hemodynamically significant aor­tic valve disease, and replacement of a diseased valve does not change the rate of aortic expansion.
In one study comparing aorta and pulmonary artery specimens in patients with BAV and tricuspid aortic valve disease, those with BAV had decreased FBN1 concentrations in both the aor­tic and pulmonary specimens, suggesting a systemic disorder. Vascular smooth muscle cells from patients with BAV show intra­cellular accumulation and reduction of extracellular distribution of several structural elements including fibrillin, fibronectin, and tenascin. inflammation and increased expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in patients with BAV compared to those with tricuspid aortic valve disease. risk of developing BAV, also exhibit an increased rate of aneurysm formation.
193
Although it was once thought that the aneurysmal
221
Further evi-
222
Moreover, abnormalities in the aortic wall
223
16
Surgical specimens demonstrate greater amounts of
225,226
Patients with Turner's syndrome, who are at increased
227
224
Aortic Coarctation
Coarctation of the aorta represents 5% of congenital heart disease. The clinical consequences of aortic coarctation are varied, rang­ing from being life-threatening in infancy to remaining unappre­ciated until adulthood.
228
Coarctation has long been recognized as associated with de novo aortic aneurysm development, and aneurysms can also develop at the site of coarctation repair— specifically patch angioplasty repair—in up to 20% of patients.
229,230
Some reports indicate aneurysm formation can even occur sev­eral decades after initial repair. Intermediate follow-up studies suggest that percutaneous balloon angioplasty repair results in a 2% to 5% rate of repair-site aortic aneurysm formation.
231,232
A potential explanation for the relationship between coarctation and aortic aneurysm is the common link with the presence of BAV in approximately 15% of patients with aortic coarctation.
212
Other Conditions Associated with Aortic Aneurysm
Although most aortic aneurysms occur as a result of degenerative processes in the aortic wall as described earlier, certain disease states including vasculitis, infection, and inherited abnormalities of structural proteins predispose patients to aortic aneurysm forma­tion (see
Box 37-1).