Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3608_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
83 Мб
Скачать
PA RT VI
MESENTERIC VASCULAR DISEASE
CHAPTER
26 Epidemiology and Pathophysiology
of Mesenteric Vascular Disease
Rachel C. Danczyk, Gregory J. Landry, Gregory L. Moneta
Severe acute intestinal ischemia results from sudden symptomatic reduction in intestinal blood flow of sufficient magnitude to poten­tially result in intestinal infarction. bowel and/or right colon may result from mesenteric arterial occlu­sion (embolus or thrombosis), mesenteric venous occlusion, and nonocclusive processes, especially vasospasm ( dissections of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), either in asso­ciation with cystic medial degeneration of the arteries or, more commonly, as progression of an existing dissection in the descend­ing thoracic aorta into the SMA and celiac artery, may also result in acute intestinal ischemia.
Acute Arterial Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia
Acute Mesenteric Arterial Embolism
Roughly 25% of all cases of acute mesenteric ischemia are due to emboli to the SMA, 25% of cases are due to thrombosis of pre­existing atherosclerotic lesions, and the remaining 50% are due to a variety of other etiologies. left atrial or ventricular mural thrombi or from cardiac valvular lesions.1 These thrombi are most often associated with cardiac dysrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, global myocardial dysfunc­tion with poor ejection fraction, or discrete hypokinetic regions produced by previous myocardial infarction (MI).3 About 15% of emboli lodge at the origin of the SMA, but the majority lodge 3 to 10 cm distally in the tapered segment of the SMA just past the origin of the middle colic artery.2 More than 20% of emboli to the SMA are associated with concurrent emboli to another arte­rial bed. can be compounded by reactive mesenteric vasospasm, further reducing collateral flow and exacerbating the ischemic insult.
4
Intestinal ischemia due to embolic arterial occlusion
2
1
Acute ischemia of the small
Fig. 26-1). Isolated
Mesenteric emboli can originate from
2,5
cardiac surgery, with a reported mortality rate of greater than 50% in most series. by most extracorporeal circuits allows severely stenotic visceral vessels to occlude during cardiopulmonary bypass. Identified risk factors for this complication include prolonged cross-clamp times, use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, low cardiac output syndromes, blood transfusion, triple-vessel disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), and peripheral artery disease (PAD).
5,7
Presumably, the nonpulsatile perfusion delivered
7
Pathophysiology of Occlusive Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Acute mesenteric ischemia, whether the underlying cause is embolic or thrombotic, may eventually lead to intestinal infarc­tion (
Fig. 26-2). Hypoxia and hypercarbia that occur during flow
interruption, and reperfusion injury once intestinal blood flow is restored, all contribute to tissue loss injury is believed to be principally mediated by activation of the enzyme xanthine oxidase and recruitment and activation of cir­culating neutrophils (PMNs). involves production of oxygen-derived free radicals by xanthine oxidase that then causes profound local tissue injury through lipid peroxidation, membrane disruption, and increased microvascu­lar permeability. autocrine and paracrine manner by secreting chemotactic cyto­kines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-1, platelet­derived growth factor [PDGF]) that perpetuate further damage to the reperfused tissue. Once activated, PMNs degranulate, releasing myeloperoxidase, collagenases, and elastases that further injure already ischemic and vulnerable tissue. genous inflammatory cascade is not restricted to the injured organ and may also have deleterious systemic effects, with cardiac, pulmonary, and other organ system dysfunction.
5,9
The ischemic endothelium recruits PMNs in an
9
The mechanism of injury likely
8
(Fig. 26-3). Reperfusion
5,10
Activation of this endo-
5
Acute Mesenteric Arterial Thrombosis
Thrombosis of the SMA or the celiac artery is usually associated with preexisting critical stenoses. Many of these patients have his­tories consistent with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), includ­ing postprandial pain, weight loss, “food fear,” and early satiety. Superior mesenteric artery thrombosis can be regarded as a complication of untreated chronic intestinal ischemia. plaque likely progresses slowly to a critical stenosis over years until thrombosis occurs.
Unlike embolic occlusions, thrombosis of the SMA generally occurs flush with the aortic origin of the vessel. Aortic dissection involving the visceral vessels, though rare, can cause acute mesen­teric ischemia. The intimal flap of the dissection can extend into, compress, or exclude the mesenteric orifice. ischemia is also an uncommon (< 1%) but serious complication of
5
Acute mesenteric
1
The SMA
1,6
Natural History of Acute Mesenteric Arterial Occlusive Disease
The mortality rate for occlusive acute mesenteric ischemia exceeds 70% in most series. emia resulting from SMA embolism has a more favorable progno­sis than that resulting from SMA thrombosis. acute intestinal ischemia due to SMA thrombosis is rare. The more favorable prognosis associated with embolism is attributable to the fact that most emboli lodge distally in the SMA (beyond the origin of the middle colic artery), thus allowing perfusion of the proximal intestine via middle colic and jejunal artery branches. Thrombotic occlusion of the SMA usually occurs proximal to the middle colic artery, and therefore completely interrupts mid-gut arterial perfusion in patients with poorly developed celiac artery or inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) collateral flow.
1,2,5,11,12
Occlusive acute intestinal isch-
1
Survival following
1,3,6
1
323
324
Other
Acute blood flow interruption
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
10%
Nonocclusive
CH
26
MVT
15%
Embolus
25%
FIGURE 261 Etiology of acute mesenteric ischemia. MVT, mesenteric venous thrombosis.
Thrombosis
25%
Hypoxia, hypercarbia
Reperfusion
Xanthine oxidase and polymorphonuclear
neutrophil (PMN) activation
25%
Oxygen-derived free radicals
Tissue injury
FIGURE 263 Pathophysiological mechanisms of acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia.
FIGURE 262 Ischemic bowel. Arrows indicate segments of clearly
infarcted intestine.
Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia
Epidemiology
Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) accounts for 25% of all episodes of acute intestinal ischemia. arterial blood flow is inadequate to supply perfusion to the bowel. The result is intestinal ischemia and infarction in the presence of a patent macroscopic vasculature. tified multiple risk factors for development of NOMI ( Mesenteric arterial vasospasm may occur following elective revas­cularization procedures for chronic SMA occlusion. In such cases, vasoconstriction of small and medium-sized vessels is precipitated by early enteral feeding.
18
Without prompt intervention, NOMI may
1,5,13,14
In NOMI, microscopic
15
Previous reports
15–17
have iden-
Box 26-1).
Box 26-1 Risk Factors for Development of
Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia
Age >50 years Atherosclerotic mesenteric arterial disease Digitalis use Sepsis Prior hypotensive episodes Congestive heart failure (CHF) Coronary artery disease (CAD) Vasoconstrictive drugs Recent myocardial infarction (MI) Cardiac arrhythmias
progress from localized intestinal ischemia to transmural infarc­tion, peritonitis, and death. ment, owing to the underlying medical conditions that precipitate NOMI and frequent delays in diagnosis.
19,20
Mortality is high regardless of treat-
5,13–15
Pathophysiology
Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia was first recognized in autop­sies of patients with small-intestinal gangrene in the absence of arterial or venous occlusion. mechanisms of mesenteric circulation has demonstrated that the pathophysiology of NOMI is multifactorial. Virtually all patients with NOMI have a severe coexisting illness, commonly severe cardiac failure.
23
It is postulated that hypoperfusion from car­diac failure, resulting in peripheral hypoxemia and splanchnic vasoconstriction, precipitates intestinal ischemia. vasoconstriction, intestinal hypoxia, and ischemia-reperfusion injury all contribute to development of NOMI.
Mesenteric vasoconstriction, the hallmark of NOMI, represents an exaggerated homeostatic mechanism induced by excessive sympathetic activity during cardiogenic shock or hypovolemia. The body attempts to maintain cardiac and cerebral perfusion at the expense of splanchnic and peripheral circulations. Experimental evidence suggests that the mediators of this response are endothelin-1 (ET-1), nitric oxide (NO), vasopressin, and angioten­sin (Ang).
24,25
Endothelin-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor secreted
21,22
Investigation of the regulatory
13,14
Mesenteric
26
At low concentrations it acts as a vasodilator, whereas at higher concentrations it acts as an oxygen-derived free radical, impairing mitochondrial energy production.
The splanchnic autoregulatory system is affected by local arteriolar smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation, as well as increased cellular oxygen extraction.
27
Adequate oxygen delivery may be maintained despite declining perfusion pressures until a critical threshold is reached. In experimental models, maxi­mal extraction is reached at a pressure of 40 mmHg, but beyond this point, oxygen consumption declines, and ischemia ensues.28 Neri et al. recently demonstrated that postoperative cardiac sur­gery patients who develop NOMI had persistent deficits between oxygen delivery (Do2) and consumption (Vo2) because of poor cir­culatory reserve. In contrast, postoperative cardiac patients who did not develop NOMI were able to normalize their D by optimizing their cardiac output.
14
In the presence of impaired
o
:Vo2 ratio
2
perfusion, blood flow is not evenly distributed in the bowel wall. The mucosa retains its perfusion at the expense of the serosal lay­ers through mucosal production of NO, prostaglandins (PGs), and stimulation of dopamine-I receptors.
27
Histological damage is first observed at the villous tip and progresses to the deeper muscularis, submucosa, and mucosa within a few hours.
Once set in motion, mesenteric vasospasm may persist despite
correction of the precipitating event.
13,14
The etiology of persistent vasoconstriction once adequate blood flow is restored is unknown, but it may respond to direct intraarterial papaverine infusion or other vasodilators, including iloprost.
29
This phenomenon of protracted vasoconstriction, however, plays an important role in development and maintenance of occlusive and nonocclusive intestinal ischemia, and may also complicate mesenteric revascularization.
18
Use of vasoconstrictor agents and digitalis has been associated with the majority of cases of NOMI. Vasoactive agents, including α-adrenergic drugs and vasopressin, produce splanchnic vasocon­striction directly, whereas digoxin preparations alter mesenteric vasoreactivity by stimulating arterial and venous smooth muscle cell (SMC) contraction. lar vasoconstriction in the setting of acute venous hypertension.
27,29
This may enhance mesenteric arterio-
29
Restoration of blood flow to the ischemic intestine may be com­plicated by reperfusion injury. During critical ischemia, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels are depleted, causing distortion of ATP­dependent cell membrane systems. This results in loss of cellular homeostasis, with cellular swelling and electrolyte imbalances.27 Reduction in ATP levels also generates large amounts of adeno sine, a precursor of hypoxanthine. Within the swollen cells, calcium accumulates and triggers hydrolysis of the enzyme xanthine dehydrogenase into xanthine oxidase, which reacts with intracel­lular hypoxanthine to produce uric acid and toxic oxygen free radicals.
5,27
These free radicals exert direct damage to cellular membranes, causing capillary leak syndrome, and incite endo­genous inflammatory cascades that cause widespread tissue injury. The deleterious effects of free radicals are usually limited by endogenous scavengers such as glutathione, catalase, super­oxide dismutase, and NO.27 However, in cases of prolonged isch­emia, the capacity of this scavenger system to eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS) is exceeded, and continued damage occurs. The degree of reperfusion injury is thus related to the frequency and duration of the ischemic episodes. Clark and Gewertz dem­onstrated that two short 15-minute periods of low flow followed by reperfusion resulted in a more severe histological injury than a single 30-minute period of ischemia.
30,31
In NOMI, a similar scenario exists: hypoperfusion may be partial and occasionally repetitive. It is believed that episodic reperfusion creates a local environment replete with primed neutrophils within the ischemic bed that are capable of degranulating and releasing superoxide. This concept is substantiated by recent experimental evidence that reperfusion injury may be attenuated by reperfusion with leukodepleted blood or by blockade of EC surface receptors
for leukocyte adherence.32 In addition, several compounds includ­ing N-acetylcysteine and vitamin E have been shown in animal models to reduce tissue damage caused by reactive oxygen spe-
33
cies.
Application of these novel approaches in human NOMI
awaits further study.
Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis
Mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) refers to thrombosis of the veins draining the intestine (inferior mesenteric, superior mesen­teric, splenic, and portal veins). The obstruction in venous return leads to edema, distention, and in some cases, infarction of the affected segments.
Epidemiology
Mesenteric venous thrombosis is a comparatively rare form of mesenteric ischemia. The presentation may vary from asymptom­atic to fulminant with intestinal infarction and hemodynamic col­lapse. Mesenteric venous thrombosis was first described by Elliot in 1895 as “thrombosis of the portomesenteric venous system.”34 In 1935, Warren and Eberhard characterized MVT as a distinct clini­cal entity. These authors reported a 34% mortality rate following intestinal resection for venous thrombosis.
Mesenteric venous thrombosis currently constitutes no more than 5% to 15% of all cases of acute mesenteric ischemia. 372 patients with MVT were reported from 1911 to 1984, accounted for only 6.2% of 1167 patients treated for mesenteric isch­emia at the Mayo Clinic from 1972 to 1993. found that MVT represented 0.006% of hospital admissions. estimated that intestinal infarction due to MVT is encountered in less than 1 in 1000 laparotomies for acute abdomen.
Pathophysiology
Mesenteric venous thrombosis can be classified as primary or sec­ondary. Primary MVT is defined as spontaneous idiopathic thrombosis of mesenteric veins not associated with any other disease or etiologi­cal factor. substantially in the past decade because of increased recognition of inherited thrombotic disorders and hypercoagulable states.
to have secondary MVT. Currently, however, a causative factor can be identified in only 35% of patients with MVT. of secondary MVT are shown in accounts for 9% to 18% of episodes of MVT in young women. Protein C and protein S deficiency, antithrombin III deficiency, dysfibrinogenemia, abnormal plasminogen, polycythemia vera, thrombocytosis, sickle cell disease (SCD), and factor V Leiden mutation have all been associated with MVT. ondary MVT has also been reported, most commonly associated with volvulus, intussusception, or mechanical bowel strangulation.
Thrombosis due to an intraabdominal cause such as inflammatory
Trauma Surgery Cancer Cirrhosis Portal hypertension Inflammatory bowel disease Oral contraceptive use Splenomegaly Pancreatitis Dehydration Infection Diverticular disease Hypercoagulable states
1,5,36
Patients in whom an etiological factor can be identified are said
Location of the thrombus may be predicted by etiology.
Box 26-2 Causes of Secondary Mesenteric Venous
1,5
35
36
Only
37
and MVT
38
Ottinger and Austen
40
39
It is
The number of patients in this group has decreased
36,38
Known causes
Box 26-2. Oral contraceptive use
1,5,36,41,42
Localized sec-
41
Thrombosis
325
CH 26
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MESENTERIC VASCULAR DISEASE
326
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
conditions or surgery starts in the larger vessels at the site of com­pression and propagates distally to involve the smaller venous arcades and arcuate channels. underlying hypercoagulable state usually begins in the small ves­sels and later involves the larger vessels. rectae and the intramural vessels interferes with adequate venous
CH
drainage, with eventual hemorrhagic infarction of the involved
26
bowel segment. The transition from normal to ischemic bowel is
41
In contrast, thrombosis due to an
36,41
Occlusion of the venae
usually gradual, unlike that seen with acute embolic or thrombotic occlusion.
Natural History
The natural history of MVT varies based on the etiology. In most cases, it usually does not result in gangrenous bowel. symptomatic manifestations are diverse. Patients may present with a benign abdominal examination and few symptoms or with pro­found hemodynamic collapse. Most patients have abdominal pain. Although it can be sudden in onset, most frequently it begins insidi­ously and worsens over time. Approximately 50% of patients have pain from 5 to 30 days before seeking medical attention, and 27% report abdominal pain for more than 1 month.43 In a recent review, only 16% of patients had severe peritonitis, and 33% required bowel resection.
42
Despite improved diagnostic modalities and more aggressive treatment regimens, symptomatic acute MVT is an indi­cator of poor prognosis, with an approximate 10% to 20% 30-day mortality rate and a 3-year survival rate of 35%. evidence of chronic thrombosis fare somewhat better because collateral venous channels form and thereby augment intestinal venous drainage.
1,5,41,42
42,44
Patients with
Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
Symptomatic chronic mesenteric arterial insufficiency is a well-described but infrequently encountered clinical problem. Although the earliest report of chronic intestinal ischemia was by Councilman in 1894, the first individual to correctly associate postprandial pain with CMI. Eighteen years later, Dunphy suggested that the abdominal pain associated with chronic mesenteric arterial occlusion was a possible precursor of later intestinal infarction. Maynard performed the first successful endarterectomy for CMI. Morris et al. described the technique of retrograde aortovisceral bypass in 1962.
48
Epidemiology
Chronic mesenteric ischemia results from atherosclerosis in 90% of
1,5,49–51
cases. Nonatherosclerotic etiologies have been described in young adults
Neurofibromatosis Middle aortic syndrome Median arcuate ligament compression Visceral artery dissection Buerger's disease Rheumatoid arthritis Cocaine abuse Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) Cogan's syndrome Polyarteritis nodosa Aortic coarctation repair Radiation injury Thrombosis associated with TAA repair Mesenteric arteritis Congenital afibrinogenemia Ergot poisoning
Nonathero sclerotic causes of CMI are listed in Box 26-3.
Box 26-3 Nonatherosclerotic Conditions Associated
45
in 1918, Goodman credited Baccelli as
46
Later, Shaw and
with Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
Similarly,
and children as young as 30 months of age.
49–51
In general, Risk factors for atherosclerotic-associated CMI are similar to those of other atherosclerotic conditions, including a positive family history, seden­tary lifestyle, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking. In contrast to other atherosclerotic vascular diseases, approximately 60% of patients with CMI are female, and nearly 50% of patients have a history of earlier cardiovascular surgery. ally manifests at a mean age of about 58 years. third of patients have hypertension, coronary artery disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease.
1,5,53–56
Nearly 20% have evidence of chronic
renal insufficiency, and 10% have diabetes.
51
Symptomatic CMI gener-
1,5,46,52–56
More than one
49,56
Although there is a high prevalence of mesenteric atherosclero­sis, the clinical syndrome of symptomatic mesenteric ischemia is uncommon. significant stenoses in approximately 50% of celiac arteries, 30% of SMAs, and 30% of IMAs.
1,54,55
An autopsy series of unselected patients found
52
In a more recent series of 120 con­secutive autopsies, however, rates of significant stenoses in the celiac, SMA, and IMA were not quite as high, with 22%, 16%, and 10% incidence, respectively.
55
The prevalence of potentially flow­limiting stenosis within the mesenteric vessels increases with age, with up to 67% of those older than 80 years of age having more than 50% stenosis in some mesenteric artery.55 Aortograms per­formed for aortic aneurysmal or occlusive disease demonstrate significant stenosis of the celiac artery in 33% of cases and SMA lesions in nearly 20%.
54–56
Pathophysiology and Natural History
Chronic mesenteric ischemia occurs when the blood supply is insufficient to meet the metabolic demands of the bowel, resulting from increased motility, secretion, and absorption after meals. ease may be explained in part by the extensive mesenteric col­lateral circulation, which includes both viscerovisceral (celiac artery-SMA-IMA), and parietovisceral (hypogastric-IMA) blood flow. sis or occlusion of one or more of the major mesenteric vessels may thus be fully compensated by collateral blood flow. In addi­tion, recent evidence suggests that preexisting significant steno­ses in even remote arterial beds may provide protective effects through the mechanism of ischemic preconditioning.
47
It has been proposed that the pathophysiology of symptomatic CMI involves a regional vascular steal phenomenon. have used tonometric assessment of splanchnic blood flow in dogs with 50% stenoses of both the celiac artery and SMA to show that food intake reduced intestinal perfusion by 50%. This reduction was associated with a significant decrease in intestinal intramural pH that was attributed to steal from the intestinal to the gastric cir­culation stimulated by a food bolus within the stomach.
Rarely, single-vessel disease of the SMA may produce symptoms characteristic of CMI. The vast majority of patients who present with symptomatic CMI, however, have arteriographic evidence of multivessel visceral artery disease.
A variety of pain syndromes characterize patients with CMI. In general, the symptoms consist of upper abdominal cramping or aching pain beginning 20 to 30 minutes after eating. At first the pain may be of short duration, but later it may become more per­sistent and last for 3 to 4 hours after eating. As the disease pro­gresses, the amount of food that precipitates abdominal pain may decrease. Patients avoid eating to prevent the resulting abdominal pain. Most patients with CMI suffer weight loss secondary to dimin­ished nutritional intake; malabsorption is not the primary mecha­nism of weight loss.
No form of bowel activity is “classic” for CMI. Patients may have diarrhea (which can potentially exacerbate their nutritional deple­tion), constipation, or normal bowel habits. Without intervention, such patients develop severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and CMI can progress to visceral infarction.
Most fatal cases of CMI occur in patients with a prolonged his­tory of chronic abdominal complaints.
57
The infrequent occurrence of symptomatic dis-
1,5,55–57
The slow development of a chronic high-grade steno-
61
1,5,49–52,55,56
57
49,50,55–57
1,49–51,55–57
Such cases are
Investigators
58–60
61
1,5,46–51
frequently characterized by months of abdominal complaints and multiple negative endoscopies, CT scans, and other diagnos­tic tests. In retrospect, the diagnosis is usually obvious. A high index of suspicion and prompt intervention are clearly indicated in cases of unexplained abdominal pain and weight loss. Early diagnosis may prevent acute thrombosis of stenotic vessels and the often fatal complication of intestinal infarction.
1,49–51,55–57
REFERENCES
1. Moneta G: Acute mesenteric ischemia. In Rutherford RB, editor: Diagnosis of intestinal ischemia, Philadelphia, 2000, WB Saunders, p 2508.
2. McKinsey J, Gewertz BL: Acute mesenteric ischemia, Surg Clin North Am 77:307, 1997.
3. Park WM, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ: Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: factors associated with survival, J Vasc Surg 35:445, 2002.
4. Kaleya RN, Sammartano RJ, Boley SJ: Aggressive approach to acute mesenteric ischemia, Surg Clin North Am 72:157, 1992.
5. Schwartz LB, McKinsey JF, Gewertz BL: Visceral ischemic syndromes. In Moore WS, editor: Vascular surgery: a comprehensive review, ed 6, Philadelphia, 2002, WB Saunders, p 572.
6. Sreenarasimhaiah J: Diagnosis and management of intestinal ischemic disorders, BMJ 326:1372, 2003.
7. Ghosh S, Roberts N, Firmin RK, et al: Risk factors for intestinal ischemia in cardiac surgical patients, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:411, 2002.
8. Wyers MC: Acute mesenteric ischemia: diagnostic approach and surgical treatment, Semin Vasc Surg 23:9–20, 2010.
9. Kozuch PL, Brandt LJ: Review article: diagnosis and management of mesenteric ischaemia with an emphasis on pharmacotherapy, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21:201–215, 2005.
10. Korthius RJ, Anderson DC, Granger DN: Role of neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion in inflammatory disorders, J Crit Care 9:47, 1994.
11. Lock G: Acute mesenteric ischemia: classification, evaluation and therapy, Acta Gastroenterol Belg 65:220, 2002.
12. Edwards MS, Cherr GS, Craven TE, et al: Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia: surgical management and outcomes, Ann Vasc Surg 17:72, 2003.
13. Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, et al: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy, Eur Radiol 12:1179, 2001.
14. Neri E, Sassi C, Massetti M, et al: Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia in patients with acute aortic dissection, J Vasc Surg 36:738, 2002.
15. Howard TJ, Plaskon LA, Wiebke EA, et al: Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia remains a diagnostic dilemma, Am J Surg 171:405, 1996.
16. Lock G, Scholmerich J: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia, Hepatogastroenterology 42:234,
1995.
17. Wilcox MG, Howard TJ, Plakson LA, et al: Current theories of pathogenesis and treatment of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, Dig Dis Sci 40:709, 1995.
18. Gewertz BL, Zarins CK : Postoperative vasospasm after antegrade mesenteric revas cularization: a report of three cases, J Vasc Surg 14:382, 1991.
19. Patel A, Kaleya RN, Sammartano RJ: Pathophysiology of mesenteric ischemia, Surg Clin North Am 72:31, 1992.
20. Williams LF, Anastasia LF, Hasiotis CA, et al: Non-occlusive mesenteric infarction, Am J Surg 114:376, 1967.
21. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Case 35082), N Engl J Med 240:308, 1949.
22. Haglund U, Lundgren O: Nonocclusive acute intestinal vascular failure, Br J Surg 66:155, 1979.
23. Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, et al: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy, Eur Radiol 12:1179–1187, 2002.
24. Mitsuyoshi A, Obama K, Shinkura N, et al: Survival in nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia: early diagnosis by multidetector row computed tomography and early treatment with continuous intravenous high-dose prostaglandin E1, Ann Surg 246:229–235, 2007.
25. Luckner G, Jochberger S, Mayr VD, et al: Vasopressin as adjunct vasopressor for vasodilatory shock due to non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia, Anaesthesist 55:283–286, 2006.
26. Lamarque D, Whittle BJ: Increase in gastric intramucosal hydrogen ion concentration following endotoxin challenge in the rat and the actions of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28:164, 2001.
27. Kolkman JJ, Mensink PB: Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: a common disorder in gastroenterology and intensive care, Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 17:457, 2003.
28. Mesh CL, Gewertz BL: The effect of hemodilution on blood flow regulation in normal and postischemic intestine, J Surg Res 48:183, 1990.
29. Char D, Hines G: Chronic mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis and treatment, Heart Dis 3:231,
2001.
30. Kim EH, Gewertz BL: Chronic digitalis administration alters mesenteric vascular reactivity, J Vasc Surg 5:382, 1987.
31. Clark ET, Gewertz BL: Intermittent ischemia potentiates intestinal reperfusion injury, J Vasc Surg 13:606, 1991.
32. Toledo-Pereyra LH: Leukocyte depletion, ischemic injury and organ preservation, J Surg Res 169:188–189, 2011.
33. Dimakakos PB, Kotsis T, Kondi-Pafiti A, et al: Oxygen free radicals in abdominal aortic surgery: an experimental study, J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 43:77, 2002.
34. Elliot JW: The operative relief of gangrene of intestine due to occlusion of the mesenteric vessels, Ann Surg 21:9, 1895.
35. Warren S, Eberhard TP: Mesenteric venous thrombosis, Surg Gynecol Obstet 61:102, 1935.
36. Rhee RY, Gloviczki P: Mesenteric venous thrombosis, Surg Clin North Am 77:327, 1997.
37. Abdu R, Zakhour BJ, Dallis DJ: Mesenteric venous thrombosis—1911–1984, Surgery 101:383, 1987.
38. Rhee RY, Glovickzi P, Medonca CT, et al: Mesenteric venous thrombosis: still a lethal disease in the 1990s, J Vasc Surg 20:688, 1994.
39. Ottinger LW, Austen WG: A study of 136 patients with mesenteric infarction, Surg Gynecol Obstet 124:251, 1967.
40. Kazmers A: Intestinal ischemia caused by venous thrombosis. In: Vascular Surgery, Philadelphia, 1995, WB Saunders, p 526.
41. Kumar S, Sarr MG, Kamath PS: Mesenteric venous thrombosis, N Engl J Med 345:686, 2001.
42. Harward TR, Green D, Bergan JJ, et al: Mesenteric venous thrombosis, J Vasc Surg 9:328,
1989.
43. Morasch MD, Ebaugh JL, Chiou AC, et al: Mesenteric venous thrombosis: a changing clinical entity, J Vasc Surg 34:680, 2001.
44. Harnik IG, Brandt LJ: Mesenteric venous thrombosis, Vasc Med 15:407–418, 2010.
45. Councilman WT: Three cases of occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery, Boston Med Surg J 130:410, 1894.
46. Taylor LM, Porter JM: Treatment of chronic intestinal ischemia, Semin Vasc Surg 3:186, 1990.
47. Shaw RS, Maynard EP III: Acute and chronic thrombosis of the mesenteric arteries associated with malabsorption: a report of two cases successfully treated with thromboendarterectomy, N Engl J Med 258:874, 1958.
48. Morris GC, Crawford ES, Cooley DA, et al: Revascularization of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries, Arch Surg 84:113, 1962.
49. White CJ: Chronic mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis and management, Prog Cardiovasc Dis 54:36–40, 2011.
50. Sanders BM, Dalsing MC: Mesenteric ischemia affects young adults with predisposition, Ann Vasc Surg 17:270, 2003.
51. Zeller T, Rastan A, Sixt S: Chronic atherosclerotic mesenteric ischemia, Vasc Med 15:333–338,
2010.
52. Crawford ES, Morris GC, Myhre HO, et al: Celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric artery occlusion: surgical considerations, Surgery 82:856, 1977.
53. Shanley CJ, Ozaki CK, Zelenock GB: Bypass grafting for chronic mesenteric ischemia, Surg Clin North Am 77:381, 1997.
54. Cleveland TJ, Nawaz S, Gaines PA: Mesenteric arterial ischemia: diagnosis and therapeutic options, Vasc Med 7:311, 2002.
55. Chang JB, Stein T: Mesenteric ischemia: acute and chronic, Ann Vasc Surg 17:323, 2003.
56. Chang JB, Stein TA: Mesenteric ischemia, Asian J Surg 26:55, 2003.
57. van Bockel JH, Geelkerken RH, Wasser MN: Chronic splanchnic ischemia, Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 15:99, 2001.
58. Heusch G, Schulz R: Remote preconditioning, J Mol Cell Cardiol 34:1279, 2002.
59. Cinel I, Avlan D, Cinel L, et al: Ischemic preconditioning reduces intestinal apoptosis in rats, Shock 19:588, 2003.
60. Asoyek S, Cinel I, Avlan D, et al: Intestinal ischemic preconditioning protects the intestine and reduces bacterial translocation, Shock 18:476, 2002.
61. Poole JW, Sammartano RJ, Boley SJ: Hemodynamic basis of the pain of chronic mesenteric ischemia, Am J Surg 153:171, 1987.
327
CH 26
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MESENTERIC VASCULAR DISEASE
CHAPTER
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
27 Clinical Evaluation and Treatment
of Mesenteric Vascular Disease
Rachel C. Danczyk, Gregory L. Moneta
Evaluation
Clinical evaluation of possible mesenteric ischemia begins with a careful history and physical examination and—above all—an appropriate index of suspicion for the diagnosis. The major etiologies of mesenteric ischemia include mesenteric
venous thrombosis (MVT), acute mesenteric ischemia, nonocclu- sive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), and chronic mesenteric isch- emia (CMI). These differ in their underlying pathologies and
the clinical settings in which they occur, but there may be sig­nificant overlap in their clinical presentation. The most crucial point is to understand the variety of clinical settings in which intestinal ischemia can occur and to include mesenteric isch­emia in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with abdominal pain. The goal is to achieve a diagnosis prior to the onset of bowel infarction. Without consideration of intestinal ischemia, the appropriate diagnostic evaluation is unlikely to be obtained, resulting in needless additional morbidity and mortality.
Acute Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia is caused by embolism to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or acute thrombotic occlusion of an atherosclerotic SMA. Mortality exceeds 60%.
Thrombotic occlusion of the SMA carries a worse prognosis than embolism to the SMA because with thrombotic occlusion, the SMA occludes proximal to the middle colic artery and inter­rupts arterial flow to the entire small intestine. Emboli, which usually originate from the heart, typically lodge in the SMA distal to the origin of the middle colic artery, thereby maintaining some perfusion to the small intestine via the middle colic and jejunal artery branches.
Abdominal pain is the most common presenting symptom in patients with occlusive acute mesenteric ischemia, and physical findings can range from nonspecific tenderness to an acute abdo­men. Distention, rigidity, and rebound tenderness occur, particu­larly when the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia is delayed. The classic presentation is sudden onset of acute abdominal pain out of proportion to the physical findings. This reflects profound intestinal ischemia without associated bowel perforation and peri­tonitis. Vomiting, fever, and diarrhea are present in one third of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia. Patients with embolism tend to present with an acute onset of abdominal pain, whereas patients with thrombosis of a stenotic SMA may have a more delayed presentation.
Laboratory values are typically nonspecific. The majority of patients will have moderate to marked leukocytosis, but about 10% of patients will have a normal white blood cell (WBC) count. Elevated serum amylase and metabolic acidosis may occur in patients with necrotic bowel, but an absence of these findings does not exclude bowel necrosis.
RADIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
Ultrasound has a limited role in diagnosing acute occlusive mes­enteric ischemia. Duplex ultrasonography in the setting of an acute abdomen is limited by abdominal distention, excessive bowel gas, and patient discomfort.
1
An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan is often obtained during evaluation of a patient with abdominal pain. In addition to finding other abdominal pathologies causing abdominal pain, CT scans can detect late findings of acute mesenteric ischemia with a sensitivity of 90%, including bowel luminal dilation, bowel wall thickening, submucosal edema or hemorrhage, pneumatosis intestinalis, and portal venous gas. with some degree of intestinal infarction. Emboli tend to lodge distally, and thus the sensitivity of CT scanning in detecting mes­enteric arterial embolic occlusion is low and ranges from 37% to
3
80%
(Fig. 27-1). In patients with early ischemia, there may be mini- mal findings on CT scans. These patients benefit most from early diagnosis and definitive mesenteric revascularization before the onset of intestinal infarction. Therefore, a high index of suspicion and thorough physical examination is of the utmost importance in this population of patients.
Mesenteric angiography remains the gold standard for diagnos­ing vascular lesions associated with acute mesenteric ischemia, but its use is predicated on clinical judgment. In a patient with obvious peritoneal findings and suspected necrotic bowel, as evidenced by hypotension and acidosis, an urgent exploratory laparotomy is required to resect necrotic bowel and perform revascularization. In this emergent situation, preparation and per­formance of a mesenteric angiogram may delay definitive opera­tive treatment and increase mortality.
In patients without peritoneal findings but clinically suspected to have mesenteric ischemia, angiography can be performed to make the definitive diagnosis and plan additional therapy. Abrupt occlusion of the SMA distal to the origin of the middle colic artery is typically seen in patients with an embolus (Figs. 27-2
through 27-4), whereas patients with thrombotic occlusion of a
chronically stenotic SMA show signs of occlusion beginning at its origin from the aorta.
TREATMENT
Treatment of acute mesenteric occlusive ischemia is aimed at the etiology of the disease. With acute embolic disease, embo­lectomy can be performed. Thrombotic disease should generally be addressed with a bypass operation. Bypass as an option for acute mesenteric occlusive ischemia treatment is discussed later in the chapter.
Operative Embolectomy
Once angiography has identified embolic disease, the patient is taken to the operating room for abdominal exploration and embo­lectomy. When performing an SMA embolectomy, a midline inci­sion in the abdomen is made, followed by a thorough examination of the abdominal contents. This may or may not reveal intestinal infarction. The transverse colon is then reflected superiorly, and the SMA is approached at the root of the small-bowel mesentery. The ligament of Treitz is divided and the proximal SMA mobilized. If the embolus is located more distally, the distal SMA may be exposed at the root of the small-bowel mesentery. Embolectomy is performed through a transverse arteriotomy using standard bal­loon catheters, and the embolus is extracted. The arteriotomy is then closed, and the intestines are again inspected for viability; any nonviable bowel is resected. A Doppler probe can be used to assess the antimesenteric border for intestinal arterial flow. If the bowel viability is equivocal, a “second look” operation can be planned in the following 24 to 48 hours to reassess the bowel and resect if necessary.
4
2
These findings are associated
328
FIGURE 271 Axial computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrating a mid-aortic thrombus that caused embolic occlusion of superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
329
CH 27
CliniCAl EvAluATion And TREATmEnT of mEsEnTERiC vAsCulAR disEAsE
FIGURE 274 Anteroposterior angiogram of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) after operative embolectomy demonstrating filling of distal SMA.
Embolic
occlusion
FIGURE 272 Anteroposterior angiogram demonstrating abrupt embolic occlusion of superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
Embolic occlusion
FIGURE 273 Anteroposterior angiogram of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) demonstrating embolic occlusion of distal SMA.
Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
Patients with CMI are typically women (3:1 female-to-male ratio) between the ages of 40 and 70 years, and a history of recurrent abdominal pain is the most critical factor in the diagnosis. The pain associated with CMI is mid-abdominal or epigastric in origin and is described as colicky or a dull intense ache that may radi­ate to the back. Pain is postprandial and generally begins 15 to 30 minutes after eating and lasts up to 4 hours. There are no signs of peritonitis, and the degree of pain may reflect the volume of the ingested meal.
Patients may ingest some meals without pain early in the course of CMI, so pain may be initially attributed to cholelithiasis, pep­tic ulcer disease, or malignancy. Patients often undergo extensive evaluation with endoscopy, CT, barium studies, and abdominal ultrasonography prior to reaching a diagnosis of CMI. As the disease progresses, patients begin to experience pain with each meal and may develop a fear of food. Weight loss, the hallmark of CMI, results from limited nutritional intake, not malabsorption; patients with CMI will have normal gastrointestinal absorption test results.
RADIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
Mesenteric Angiography
Chronic mesenteric ischemia is a clinical diagnosis. There are no absolute confirmatory tests, but contrast mesenteric angiography is the standard to diagnose arterial lesions associated with CMI. Radiographs are obtained in the lateral and anteroposterior pro­jections. Findings on angiography suggestive of CMI include steno­sis or occlusion of the celiac artery (CA) and/or the SMA ( When the origins of the CA or SMA are occluded, the more distal vessels are often patent through filling by enlarged and easily visu­alized pancreaticoduodenal arterial collaterals. Occasionally, one can find mid-SMA stenosis with a normal proximal SMA (Fig. 27-6) or a “coral reef” aorta with associated SMA occlusion ( all patients with mesenteric artery obstruction, however, have mes­enteric ischemia. It is vitally important to differentiate high-grade mesenteric artery stenosis from the clinical entity of CMI.
Duplex Ultrasonography
Duplex ultrasonography can serve as a valuable noninvasive screening test for splanchnic artery stenosis and for follow-up in patients with mesenteric artery reconstructions. Despite the
Fig. 27-5).
Fig. 27-7). Not
330
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
CH
27
SMA
stenosis
FIGURE 275 Lateral aortogram demonstrating long-segment stenosis of superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
SMA stenosis
FIGURE 276 Lateral aortogram demonstrating long-segment stenosis of middle superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
accuracy of duplex detection of mesenteric artery stenoses, an appropriate history and physical examination and angiographic confirmation of high-grade stenoses or occlusion of the splanch­nic vessels are still required for the diagnosis of CMI. Duplex exami­nation of the mesenteric arteries can be technically difficult and should be performed by vascular technologists with extensive experience in abdominal ultrasound techniques.
Celiac stenosis
Aortic coral reef plaque
SMA occlusion
FIGURE 277 Lateral aortogram demonstrating “coral reef” atherosclerotic plaque in aorta, with associated superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion and celiac artery (CA) stenosis.
In healthy individuals, fasting blood flow velocity waveforms dif­fer between the SMA and the CA. Arterial waveforms reflect end­organ vascular resistance. The liver and spleen have relatively high constant metabolic requirements and are therefore low-resistance organs. As a result, CA waveforms are generally biphasic with a peak systolic component, no reversal of end-systolic flow, and a relatively high end-diastolic velocity (EDV). The normal fasting SMA velocity waveform is triphasic, reflecting the high vascular resistance of the intestinal tract at rest (
Figs. 27-8 and 27-9). There
is a peak systolic component, often an end-systolic reverse flow component, and a minimal diastolic flow component.
Changes in Doppler-derived arterial waveforms in response to feeding are different in the CA and SMA. Because the liver and spleen have fixed metabolic demands, there is no significant change in CA velocity waveform after eating. Blood flow in the SMA, however, increases markedly after a meal, reflecting a marked decrease in intestinal arterial resistance. Waveform changes in the SMA postprandially include a near doubling of systolic velocity, tripling of the EDV, and loss of end-systolic reversal of blood flow. In addition, there is a small but detectable increase in the diam­eter of the SMA postprandially. The diameter of the SMA has been shown to be 0.60 ± after a meal. These changes are maximal at 45 minutes after inges­tion of a test meal
0.09 cm in the fasting state and 0.67 ± 0.09 cm
5
and are dependent on the composition of the meal ingested. Mixed composition meals produce the greatest flow increase in the SMA when compared with equal caloric meals composed solely of fat, glucose, or protein.
Detection of Splanchnic arterial StenoSiS
6
Duplex ultrasound can detect hemodynamically significant steno­ses in splanchnic vessels. In 1986, investigators at the University of Washington found that flow velocities in stenotic SMAs and CAs were significantly increased when compared with normal SMAs and
7
CAs.
Quantitative criteria for splanchnic artery stenosis were first
developed and validated at Oregon Health & Science University.
8
In a blinded prospective study of 100 patients who underwent mesenteric artery duplex scanning and lateral aortography, a peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the SMA of 275 cm/s or more indicated 70% or greater SMA stenosis with a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of
Aorta/Superior Mesenteric Artery
FIGURE 278 Duplex ultrasonography of aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
96%, positive predictive value of 80%, negative predictive value of 99%, and accuracy of 96%
9
(Fig. 27-10). In the same study, a PSV of 200 cm/s or higher identified 70% or greater angiographic CA ste­nosis with a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 63%, negative predictive value of 94%, and accuracy of 82% (
Fig. 27-11).
Other duplex criteria for mesenteric artery stenoses are also in use. An SMA EDV greater than 45 cm/s correlates with 50% or greater SMA stenosis with 92% specificity and 100% sensitivity. A CA EDV of 55 cm/s or higher predicts 50% or greater CA stenosis with 93% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% accuracy.
10,11
Postprandial mesenteric duplex scanning has been used as an adjunct to fasting duplex scanning to aide in the diagnosis of mes­enteric artery stenoses.
12
In patients with less than 70% SMA ste­nosis, postprandial SMA PSV increases by more than 20% over baseline velocity. The percent increase in SMA PSV is less in patients with 70% or greater SMA stenosis. Specificity for the combination of fasting SMA PSV and postprandial PSV, however, is marginally improved over that provided by a fasting duplex scan alone. Therefore, although theoretically attractive, postprandial duplex
331
CH 27
CliniCAl EvAluATion And TREATmEnT of mEsEnTERiC vAsCulAR disEAsE
FIGURE 279 Duplex ultrasono­graphy of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), with peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 208 cm/s signifying a normal SMA.
FIGURE 2710 Duplex ultrasono­graphy of superior mesenteric artery (SMA), with peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 389 cm/s signifying 70% or greater SMA stenosis.
332
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
CH
27
FIGURE 2711 Duplex ultrasono­graphy of celiac artery (CA), with peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 331 cm/s signifying 70% or greater CA stenosis.
scanning offers no significant improvement over fasting mesenteric duplex scanning; its routine use as part of ultrasound assessment of mesenteric artery stenosis is unnecessary. Postprandial exami­nations are occasionally useful in technically difficult ultrasound studies in that if there is a postprandial response, the insonated vessel can be confirmed as being the SMA.
Duplex ultrasonography is best used as an initial screening study to evaluate for visceral artery stenosis in patients with chronic abdomi­nal pain that may be consistent with CMI. Angiography is required to establish a definitive diagnosis of mesenteric artery stenosis.
Computed Tomography
Standard CT imaging can be of some value in mesenteric artery ste­nosis evaluation (also see Chapter 14). Currently, however, no stud­ies have compared the accuracy of spiral CT with angiography in assessing visceral artery stenoses. Computed tomography angiogra­phy can detect but not precisely quantify proximal stenosis of the CA and SMA, and it is limited by lower resolution and bowel motion artifact in its ability to detect lesions involving more distal branches. Computed tomography scans are often obtained to evaluate abdom­inal pain. Findings suggestive of mesenteric artery stenosis include calcification at the origin of the CA and SMA and lack of contrast enhancement within the vessel lumen (
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Development of fast breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium­enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3D Gd-enhanced MRA) has improved the ability of MRA to detect proximal splanch­nic artery lesions (also see Chapter 13). Magnetic resonance angiog­raphy is limited in its ability to image more distal visceral branches because of limited spatial resolution, peristaltic and respiratory motion, and chemical shift changes between the vessels and fat. The accuracy of 3D Gd-enhanced MRA in detecting visceral artery stenosis has been well studied. Overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting 75% or greater stenosis or occlusion of the CA, SMA, or inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) were 100% and 95%, respectively.
In addition to providing anatomical details, magnetic resonance (MR) technology can quantify arterial flow using the phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, which provides information about the presence, magnitude, and direction of blood flow and has been studied in patients with CMI. prandial flow in the SMA have been compared in patients with documented atherosclerotic disease and normal volunteers. Mean fasting SMA blood flow has been shown to be higher in atheroscle­rotic patients than in normal individuals. This difference can be used to evaluate for CMI. The addition of MR oximetry technology, where increased oxygen extraction after a meal is seen in those with significant mesenteric vessel atherosclerosis, is promising with
Fig. 27-12).
15
Fasting and post-
13
FIGURE 2712 Computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) demonstrating a patent supraceliac aorta to common hepatic artery, and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) bypass. Proximal SMA is occluded.
regard to diagnosing CMI.15 Further validation studies correlating the degree of change in mesenteric blood flow and oxygenation with angiographic percentage of stenosis will be necessary before phase-contrast MRI and MR oximetry are universally adopted as routine noninvasive diagnostic methods for patients with CMI.
14
Treatment
Chronic and Acute Mesenteric Occlusive Disease
The available literature includes no randomized or controlled clinical trials of surgical intervention for treatment of mesenteric ischemia, and none are likely to be performed. Published clinical reports include varied recommendations for treatment, and many do not include descriptions of operative methods. Others describe technically demanding procedures requiring extensive dissections in difficult areas. postoperative graft patency been included in clinical series. For all these reasons, there is no current consensus regarding the surgical details of treatment for intestinal ischemia.
16,17
Only recently has objective determination of
18,19