Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4385_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
81 Мб
Скачать
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGAUDITORY NEUROPATHY SPECTRUM DISORDER AND AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER
16. AUDITORY NEUROPATHY SPECTRUM DISORDER AND AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER
Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a phenotypically diverse group of hear­ing disorders that can aect both children and adults. It is characterised by normal outer hair cell (OHC) function but impaired neural transmission resulting in disruption of coding of acoustic signals in the auditory system.
Clinical Features
One of the key features of ANSD is hearing diculties greater than would be expected from behavioral audiometry. e hearing diculties are worse with speech compared with environmental sounds and are particularly aected by background noise. In children, this adversely aects speech and language development.
e test battery for ANSD is shown in Table 16.1. ANSD is typied by the following:
1 Speech tests (in quiet and noise) worse than expected from audiometry 2 Presence of OHC function as measured with cochlear microphonics (CM) and
otoacoustic emissions (OAEs)
3 Absence or abnormality of the auditory brainstem response (ABR)
Table 16.1 Audiological test battery for ANSD
Test type Notes
Behavioral audiometry Age-appropriate testing of hearing
thresholds, e.g. visual response audiometry or PTA
Speech discrimination
tests
Speech in noise tests For example, quick speech in noise
Objective measure of
middle ear function
Objective measure of
cochlear OHC function
Objective measure of
middle ear reex
Electrophysiological
tests
Note: ABR, auditory brainstem response; ANSD, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder; CI,
cochlear implantation, CM, cochlear microphonics; OAE, otoacoustic emission; OHC, outer hair cell; PTA, pure-tone audiogram.
88 e Ear
Speech recognition threshold (SRT) Word recognition score (WRS)
test or hearing in noise test
Tympanogram Usually normal
CM or OAEs Normal OHC function, though
Stapedial reex thresholds Absent stapedial reex in ANSD
ABR Absent or grossly abnormal in
Auditory late response May help guide assessment of
Normal to profound hearing loss
Worse than expected from
behavioral audiometry
Likely markedly impaired
this can worsen with time
If stapedial reex is present but
ABR is absent, this suggests brainstem neuropathy due to lesion higher than superior olivary complex
ANSD
level of hearing impairment; guide amplication/CI by serving as marker for auditory cortical development
AUDITORY NEUROPATHY SPECTRUM DISORDER AND AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER
15. TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
ANSD is therefore dierentiated from typical sensorineural hearing loss, in which both OAE and ABR responses are aected, and pure-tone audiogram (PTA) is usually in keeping with the level of functional hearing.
Comorbidities such as developmental delays, attention decit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, visual problems, and motor disorders are reported in up to 54% of children with ANSD.
Epidemiology
ANSD can be congenital or acquired and present at any age. e prevalence of ANSD varies between 1 and 10% in the general hearing-impaired population, and up to 40% in hearing­impaired patients with a history of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. e prevalence of ANSD in a well-baby population is estimated at 1 in 7000. It is bilateral in 75% of cases.
Pathophysiology
ANSD can arise from abnormalities of electromechanical transduction at the inner hair cell and axons, cell bodies, and myelin sheaths of the auditory nerve.
is results in disruption of temporal synchrony of the auditory neural signals as well as a reduction of amplitude of neural signals.
Risk Factors for ANSD
A wide range of age-dependent risk factors have been implicated in the development of ANSD. Perinatal factors including prematurity, hyperbilirubinaemia, respiratory distress syndrome/neonatal mechanical ventilation, ototoxic drugs, and cerebral palsy are the most common associations of ANSD in children. A number of genetic mutations causing ANSD have been identied. Mutations of the otoferl in, pejvakin, and connex in 26 gene are examples . ANSD can occur in Usher’s syndrome and may be associated with hereditary demyelinat­ing neuropathies such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome and Friedreich’s ataxia. Acquired causes of ANSD include multiple sclerosis, autoimmune disease, and hemosiderosis.
Diagnostic Approach
In children, perinatal history and developmental milestone attainment are important con­siderations, while in adults, family and drug history are key. Clinical examination includes assessment of developmental milestones, peripheral nerve sensation, cerebellar signs, and funduscopy. Vestibular assessment and/or testing should be considered as should refer­ral for formal ophthalmological assessment. e audiological test battery is shown in
Table 16.1. Audiometry should be performed on rst-degree relatives. Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) of the internal auditory meati and brain is necessary to identify cochlear nerve hypoplasia/aplasia. Referral to a clinical geneticist should be considered based on clinical picture and patient consent.
Management of ANSD
A multidisciplinary approach, parental counseling, and timely intervention are crucial. Broadly speaking, the main strategies involve (1) improving signal-to-noise ratio and (2) amplication and (3) early language interventions.
Directional microphones, personal frequency modulation (FM) systems, greater support in classroom, reduction in background noise, and workplace adaptations all play a part.
Judicious hearing aid amplication with close monitoring may be considered once reliable behaviora l thresholds have been established. However, amplication has been shown to have variable outcomes, since it can amplify the signal but not overcome the neural transmission decit. Some studies have also shown a detrimental impact on cochlear OHC function.
Cochlear implantation (CI) can be considered in selected cases with good outcomes. Implantation can provide consistent neural ring helping to overcome auditory desynchrony such as in synaptopathy. However, there is some evidence to suggest that CI in patients with
e Ear 89
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGAUDITORY NEUROPATHY SPECTRUM DISORDER AND AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER
ANSD involving the spiral ganglion and auditory nerve is associated with poorer outcome compared with pre-synaptic ANSD.
Early language intervention is important in young children with ANSD and will involve input from speech and language therapy, teachers of the deaf, and signicant parental involvement.
Auditory Processing Disorder
Prevalence and Denition
Approximately 5% of children and 1–10% of adults who present to audiology departments with complaints of signicant listening diculties in noise or in group conversations have normal pure-tone thresholds. In a proportion of these patients, listening symptoms are attributed to functional decits in sound processing within the extended central auditory nervous system. is clinical presentation is categorised as an auditory processing disor­der (APD). APD is a common type of hearing impairment that remains under recognised, despite its high burden on communication, social, and emotional aspects of life. is clinical presentation has attracted considerable debate. A recent European consensus proposes that APD is diagnosed on the basis of the following criteria
3
:
1 Normal audiometric thresholds in both ears 2 Abnormal performance in at least two validated auditory processing tests that assess
dierent processes in at least one ear, including in a non-speech test
3 Presence of listening diculties (Table 16.2) and/or risk factors associated with APD 4 Normal non-verbal intelligence 5 Good ability to follow test instructions
Etiology
In children, as well as in adults, APD may be diagnosed in the background of neurological disease such as brain tumors, stroke, trauma, prematurity or low birthweight, epilepsy, and brain infections or demyelinating conditions. APD may also overlap with developmental disorders such as language impairment, dyslexia, and attention-decit hyperactivity disor­der. In such cases, the clinician should carefully consider whether the clinical presentation is instead due to decits in higher order language or cognitive domains. Another subtype of APD is the ‘spatial processing disorder (SPD)’ that is attributed to a prolonged history of chronic otitis media in childhood, giving rise to decits in binaural auditory processing
The Diagnostic Approach
e diagnostic process includes history taking, including patient/teacher/parent questionnaires, followed by targeted medical examination. Children and adults with APD have speech in noise, auditory at tention, localis ation of sound, and other aud itory diculties (see Table 16.2). Chi ldren
Table 16.2 Symptoms of APD
Speech understanding difculties In background noise, acoustically challenging/complex
acoustic environments, when speech quality is degraded Speech discrimination difculties Difculties to repeat or recall similar sounding words Auditory memory/attention
difculties
Sound localisation/streaming
difculties
Relies on multisensory cues For example, seeking visual/facial cues to better understand Hyperacusis With or without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder Disproportionate educational/
cognitive/language difculties
Difculties recalling instructions; difculties concentrating in
noise
Difculties identifying the source of a sound; with
separation of auditory foreground from auditory
background
90 e Ear
AUDITORY NEUROPATHY SPECTRUM DISORDER AND AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER
Table 16.3 APD test battery (AAA 2010)
Auditory processing domain What the test assesses
Auditory discrimination Ability to differentiate similar acoustic stimuli that differ in
Auditory temporal processing Ability to analyse acoustic events over time Dichotic listening Ability to separate (i.e. binaural separation) or integrate (i.e.
Low-redundancy speech
recognition (monaural)
Binaural interaction Binaural processes dependent on intensity or time differences
Other tests
Electro-acoustic measures Otoacoustic emissions, acoustic reex thresholds, and acoustic
Electrophysiological measures Auditory brainstem response usually normal (consider
15. TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
frequency, intensity, and/or temporal parameters
binaural integration) disparate auditory stimuli presented to each ear simultaneously
Recognition of degraded speech stimuli presented to one ear
at a time
of acoustic stimuli
reex decay usually normal
measuring middle latency and auditory late response)
may experience diculties in the classroom and psychosocial diculties. History should also ascertain risk factors, educational, and professional history, as well as family history of related disorders (e.g. hearing or neurological disorders). e American Academy of Audiology (2010) proposes that the central auditory processing test battery should include a number of tests in addition to PTA and speech-in-quiet tests, as detailed in Table 16.3.
Assessments of other domains such as language and cognition are of paramount importance as these factors can aect APD test performance. Age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline is such an example. Assessment of cognitive skills, such as working memory, is there­fore useful during assessment.
Management Strategies
e goal for APD rehabilitation is to improve the functional decits of individuals that impact their communication and well-being. A multidisciplinary team approach should be employed and should focus on the following areas:
1 Auditory training (AT) to harness brain plasticity and improve neuro-auditory
function (e.g. AT): AT can be a school- or home-based program, as well as therapy conducted by a speech language therapist or audiologist in the clinic. It involves predominantly language-based tasks. Examples of informal AT are discriminating similar sounding notes on a keyboard (temporal or timing skills) and listening to lyr­ics of songs (speech-in-noise ability). ere are also several commercially available computer-based AT programs. Post-training improvements are reported on a range of auditory and non-auditory measures, but long-term benets are unknown.
2 Signal enhancement strategies including environmental modications to reduce the
deleterious eects of noise and reverberation of the acoustic environment: Remote microphone hearing aids (RMHAs) are personal listening devices that bypass high­level classroom noise and transmit clearer speech to the child’s ears. A recent meta­analysis presents moderately strong evidence that use of an FM device (a specic type of RMHA) in the classroom improves children’s listening and attention. ere is case­control study evidence that these devices improve speech in noise listening in adults.
3 Teaching children and adults compensatory strategies to overcome functional di-
culties: ese strategies may include ‘active listening’ where the individual is taught how to take responsibility for their own listening and strategies that aim to enhance auditory memory/attention. Curriculum modications (e.g. pre-teaching new mate­rial, giving breaks to the student during the day) are also widely used.
e Ear 91
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGHEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
KEY POINTS
ANSD is a heterogenous group of hearing disorders characterised by normal OHC
function on OAE and CM test but abnormal ABR.
Both ANSD and APD are characterised by hearing difculties greater than would be
expected from behavioral audiometry.
Management of ANSD includes improvements in signal-to-noise ratio, amplication,
and early language interventions.
Management of APD includes improvements in signal-to-noise ratio, AT, and learning
compensatory strategies.
Further Reading
1. Moser, T. and Starr, A. (2016) ‘Auditory neuropathy–neural and synaptic mechanisms’, Nature Reviews. Neurology, 12(3), pp. 135–149. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.10.
2. ‘Guidelines for Aetiological Investigation into Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in Children and Young Adults’ (2018). British Association of Audiovestibular Physicians.
https://www.baap.org.uk/uploads/1/1/9/7/119752718/guidelines_for_ansd_ nal_version.pdf.
3. Iliadou, V. V., Ptok, M., Grech, H., Pedersen, E. R., Brechmann, A., Deggouj, N., Bamiou, D. E. (2018). European 17 countries consensus endorses more approaches to APD tha n reported in Wils on 2018. International journal of audiology, 1–2. doi:10.1080/
14992 027.2018.1442937
17. HEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
Introduction
Hearing aids partially overcome the decits associated with a hearing loss. ey make audi­ble sounds, and parts of sounds, that would otherwise be inaudible. ey cannot reverse the reduced resolution with which ears with sensorineural hearing loss analyse incoming sounds. However, some signal processing algorithms within hearing aids (directional micro­phones and noise suppression, see later) help compensate for this reduced resolution and the ensuing reduced understanding of speech in noisy places. Where hearing aids do not fully meet the needs of patients, additional forms of aural rehabilitation should be considered.
Components of a Hearing Aid
e essential components in hearing aids are a microphone, an amplier with controllable characteristics, a miniature earphone (called a receiver) to output the amplied signal and a battery to power the amplier. e ampliers can be controlled so that they amplify signals at dierent frequencies by dierent amounts so that they amplify so sounds more than they amplify loud sounds. Frequency-dependent amplication is needed because the amount of hearing loss usually changes with frequency and because the high-frequency parts of speech are weaker than the low-frequency parts. Intensity-dependent amplication compensates for the reduced dynamic range of sounds between threshold and discomfort that inevitably accompanies sensorineural hearing loss. e rate at which the degree of amplication varies as the input level varies can be very fast (a few milliseconds) or very slow (a few seconds). Fast and slow compression have both advantages and disadvantages relative to each other.
92 e Ear
17. HEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
HEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
Almost all hearing aids use digital signal processing to amplify as it oers more exible manipulation of the sound, and it is more easily controlled by the computer used to adjust the hearing aid to an individual patient’s needs.
ese same basic physical components are used in some multifunction, non-professionally tted, wearable devices, termed hearables. ere is a current merging of these device types, as the hearables add amplication to their features, and hearing aids add other features such as fall detection, telephone hands-free operation and step counting.
Most hearing aids also include a wireless receiver so that audio signals can be input to the device from a mobile phone or other streaming device, a remotely located microphone (such as worn by a teacher in a classroom) and/or a hearing aid on the other side of the head. e most common style of hearing aids is behind the ear (BTE), where either the entire hearing aid, or all the components except the receiver, are positioned between the pinna and the head surface. ey connect to the ear canal via a sound tube, or via thin wires when the receiver is in the ear canal. e end of the tube or the receiver are held in place in the ear canal by either a custom-shaped ear mould, or a compliant tip that deforms to match the cross-sectional shape of the ear canal. Alternative styles include in the ear, in the canal and completely in the-canal. While the latter two styles have slight cosmetic advantages over BTE devices, BTEs can contain directional microphones, which oer performance in noise that the canal­style devices cannot match. Much less commonly, a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) hearing aid is used to pick up sounds from the side of the head with a completely deaf ear, and play an amplied version of it to the other ear.
Hearing Aid Measurement in Couplers and Real Ears
e amplication characteristics of hearing aids can be measured in a standardised way by plac­ing it in a test box, with the hearing aid output connected to a coupler that very approximately simulates the ear canal acoustic impedance. During tting, amplication characteristics on an individual are determined by placing a thin probe tube inside the ear canal, and measuring the sound pressure level in the ear canal with and without the hearing aid present. e increase in sound pressure level is called the real ear insertion gain. is gain is aected by the way the hear­ing aid is coupled to the ear canal, including by how open the tting in the ear canal is. Open t­tings enable the wearer to perceive their own voice as normal, but limit the frequency range over which the hearing aid can amplify sounds, and the eectiveness of the noise reduction strategies in hearing aids. ey are most suited for people with mild or moderate loss.
Directional Microphones
Directional microphones provide more amplication for sounds arriving from broadly in front of the wearer than for sounds arriving from the side or behind the wearer. ey achieve this by sensing, and then combining the sounds arriving at two closely located sound ports on the hearing aid. Directional microphones are the major means by which hearing aids improve the clarity of the sound, in addition to simply amplifying it. Super-directional microphones, also known as beamformers, achieve a higher level of directivity by wirelessly transmitting signals sensed on one side of the head, to the hearing aid on the other side of the head. Each hearing aid thus has access to signals sensed at four dierent locations on the head. ey can allow people with moderate hearing loss to hear as well in noisy places as people with normal hearing.
Signal Processing
Digital technology makes available several signal processing schemes. ese include
Adaptive noise reduction, which makes sound more comfortable by de-emphasising
frequency bands that are dominated by noise, rather than by incoming speech Frequency lowering, which moves high-frequency speech information to slightly
lower frequencies, where the wearer has less hearing loss, and thus greater ability to use the information
e Ear 93
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGHEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
Feedback canceling, which makes whistling (an oscillation) caused by amplied
sound leaking back to the microphone less likely to occur Expansion, which lowers the hearing aid gain applied to so sounds, to make internal
hearing aid noise inaudible, even in quiet places
Candidacy
e prime requirements for a person to benet from hearing aids are that they perceive that they are having diculty hearing and that they are willing to try hearing aids. ese beliefs are much more important than the actual degree of hearing loss present (which of course is only one indicator of the extent to which the hearing and auditory processing system dier from normal).
Prescription
Because hearing loss characteristics vary with hearing loss, so too must the amount of ampli­cation that hearing aids provide. e prescription formula describes how the amplication should vary with frequency and input level to achieve the aim of that formula. e aim of the widely used National Acoustic Laboratories’ prescription is to maximise the intelligibility of speech while keeping the loudness to no more than would be perceived by a person with normal hearing thresholds listening to the same speech signal. Prescription formulae also specify the maximum output level that hearing aids should provide at any frequency. Apart from the gain-frequency response and maximum output, other aspects of the tting that must be considered when choosing the optimal hearing aid for a patient includes the physical style and size of the hearing aid, user controls, wireless connectivity and types or strength of signal processing alternatives. Despite the use of prescription procedures, because of indi­vidual dierences, there is oen a need for ne-tuning of the hearing aids aer the user has worn them for a few weeks.
Binaural Hearing
Hearing in two ears enhances our ability to understand speech in noise, and greatly enhances our ability to localise sounds. is occurs because the brain is able to take advantage of dif­ferences in the level and timing of sounds at the two ears created by the head. Bilateral tting is thus increasingly important as hearing loss increases, so that audibility is achieved at all frequencies in both ears. For a minority of people, however, binaural interference causes speech identication ability to be better when unilaterally aided than when bilaterally aided.
Children
e two major ways that hearing aid tting for babies is dierent from adults is that the small size of their ear canals must be considered, and protection against ingestion of hearing aid batteries must be provided. More subtle dierences are that whereas adults need hearing to use language, children need hearing to learn language. e earlier hearing aids are provided, preferably well before 6 months of age, the better the child’s language develops. Because children are still learning language throughout childhood, they need a better signal-to-noise ratio than adults to understand speech in challenging situations, like classrooms. e best way to achieve this is when the teacher wears a wireless remote microphone that transmits clear, non-reverberant signals to the child’s hearing aids.
More detailed information about the topics above can be found in the book Hearing Aids.
Aural Rehabilitation
While some are completely satised with the help provided by hearing aids, others have needs which cannot be fully met by them. Support for people with hearing loss may be pro­vided by an aural rehabilitation specialist such as a hearing therapist or specialist clinical psychologist. For many, the experience of losing hearing goes far beyond the frustration of mishearing speech. It can necessitate changes in lifestyle, both at work and at leisure, make conversation eortful and tiring and profoundly alter one’s sense of identity. Couples oen feel that hearing loss places a strain on their relationship. ose having diculty adjusting
94 e Ear
1
17. HEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
HEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
to life with hearing loss may well benet from an opportunity to discuss their feelings and explore ways of coping with a rehabilitation specialist. A group in particular need of urgent referral to rehabilitation services are those who develop sudden hearing loss; they oen report feelings of utter bewilderment and confusion. In a medical emergency, it is easy for emotional needs to be neglected, but timely emotional support is just as important as prompt medical treatment.
Specialist rehabilitative support can also be benecial to people who feel ambivalent about using hearing aids. ere are many reasons for this, including perceived stigma and lack of condence. An opportunity to spend time discussing one’s ambivalence in a supportive envi­ronment is likely to be more cost-eective than tting hearing aids which remain unused.
Aural Rehab Groups and Lipreading Classes
Some audiology clinics run regular aural rehab groups. ere are many possible formats, but all have the advantage of bringing people with hearing loss (and sometimes their partners) together to share experiences and ideas.
Outside the healthcare system, other groups and classes exist for people with hearing loss, including lipreading classes. ese usually involve a mixture of lipreading exercises and communication tips (such as asking people to face you and moving away from background noise). Although eects of class attendance on lipreading ability are equivocal, qualitative research indicates that people value their classes very highly. Hard-of-hearing groups or clubs are also available in some areas which oer peer support and an opportunity to take part in social activities without being restricted by hearing problems.
Auditory Training
Auditory training attempts to improve speech discrimination by presenting a variety of listen­ing tasks involving phonemes, words and sentences. Several computer-based auditory train­ing programs are available, enabling users to practice regularly at home. A systematic review of 13 computerised auditory training studies2 found evidence that performance on auditory training tasks improves signicantly with practice. Some (but not all) studies also showed generalisation of learning to untrained tasks, which of course has more real-world benet.
The Voluntary Sector
Additional support for people with hearing loss and related problems (such as tinnitus and balance disorders) is provided by charities and voluntary organisations. ese are very oen an invaluable source of information; many produce fact sheets about a range of topics and some have telephone and email help lines. ere are several forums available via the Internet and social media through which people can share information and oer support.
Technology other than Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants
ere are situations in which many users nd their hearing aids or cochlear implants inad­equate. Despite recent advances in digital signal processing, interference from background noise is still a primary cause of dissatisfaction. Telephone use can also be problematic. People with more severe hearing loss may nd the television unclear, even when using hearing aids, and family disputes over TV volume are a frequent source of irritation. Moreover, there are situations in which most people take their hearing aids or speech processors o (particularly while bathing or in bed) but still need to be aware of signals such as smoke alarms or alarm clocks. Additional technology goes some way towards solving these diculties, but aware­ness of it amongst both patients and clinicians tends to be low. Some of the more common types of hearing assistance technology is described in Table 17.1.
Using Personal Listening Equipment without Hearing Aids
Many of the devices described can be used with headphones. ese make them accessible to non–hearing-aid users and to people who need or prefer to be without their hearing aids temporarily, perhaps due to an ear infection.
e Ear 95
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGHEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
Table 17.1 Common types of hearing assistance technology
Device Description Additional information
Frequency-modulated
(FM) system
Loop system A looped wire connected to an
Streamer A small device worn around the neck
Amplied phone Landline phone with built-in volume
Pager Unit clipped to clothing vibrates to
Visual alert Bright, ashing light activated by
Receiver connects to user’s hearing
aids by direct audio input or a neckloop. Transmitter with mic placed close to any sound source or clipped to speaker’s clothing.
amplier creates an electromagnetic eld. Signal is picked up by telecoil in hearing aids, which must be activated by audiologist.
enables hearing aids to connect to Bluetooth
control.
alert wearer to phone, doorbell, alarm, baby monitor, etc.
doorbell, phone or alarm.
Often used in classrooms and
lecture theatres.
Fitted in many theatres, cinemas
and service counters. Smaller versions available for home use and travel.
Can be used with any Bluetooth-
enabled device (mobile phones, MP3 players, tablets, etc.).
Additional features (e.g. extra-
large buttons) also available.
Under-the pillow vibrating unit
available for nighttime.
May be portable or
wall-mounted.
A personal amplier with headphones can be particularly helpful in hospital. Many hearing­impaired patients on a ward will not be wearing their hearing aids. is sometimes results in sensitive information being spoken at high volume by hospital sta and being clearly audible to all those around. Speaking to the patient via a simple amplier can make all the dierence to condentiality and dignity.
Hearing Dogs
People with severe or profound hearing loss can apply for a hearing dog. Such dogs are trained to alert their owners and lead them to the source of sounds like doorbells, phones and timers. ey are also taught a ‘danger’ signal in response to a smoke alarm. Hearing dogs are identied by a special coat and can accompany their owners in public places. Many deaf people feel more condent with a hearing dog by their side.
Language Service Professionals
Language service professionals (LSPs) are sometimes employed to enable participation in meetings, conferences, training courses or court proceedings. Examples of LSPs are sign lan­guage interpreters, speech-to-text transcribers and lip speakers (who repeat what a speaker is saying voicelessly to enable lip reading). However, improvements in voice recognition so­ware mean that it is becoming increasingly easy to provide real-time transcription without the need for a third party.
Conclusion
e consequences of hearing loss are far reaching. Modern hearing aids can provide great benets, but many people with hearing loss also need additional or alternative rehabilitation services. While it is not the responsibility of otorhinolaryngologists to provide such services, it is important to be aware of what is available in the local area and to be able to make appro­priate referrals and recommendations.
96 e Ear
17. HEARING AIDS AND AUDITORY REHABILITATION
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND AUDITORY BRAINSTEM IMPLANTS
KEY POINTS
Advances in digital technology mean that as well as being able to adjust hearing aids
to meet individual hearing loss characteristics, hearing aids now automatically adapt in various helpful ways to the environment in which they are being used.
Super-directional microphones, and streaming of wireless signals originating from
mobile phones, remotely located microphones, televisions and other audio sources are amongst the advances that enable hearing-impaired people to hear well, even in noisy places.
Despite the huge benet that hearing aids can provide, they may not completely
reverse the negative impact of hearing loss on well-being.
Emotional and behavioural support for people struggling with hearing loss can
be provided individually and in groups by clinicians with specialist training in rehabilitation.
Hearing assistance technology and LSPs can help in many situations in which hearing
aids or cochlear implants do not provide adequate benet.
Further Reading
1. Dillon, H. 2012. Hearing Aids. ieme, New York.
2. Henshaw, H. & Ferguson, M. A. 2013. Ecacy of Individual Computer-Based Auditory
Training for People with Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. PLoS One, 8.
18. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND AUDITORY BRAINSTEM IMPLANTS
Cochlear Implants
Cochlear implants (CIs) are neuroprosthetic devices that directly stimulate the auditory nerve. is technology has proven revolutionary in restoring hearing to individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, enabling speech and language development in children, and improving speech perception in adults.
How a CI works
e main components of CI devices are shown in Figu re 18.1. e electrode array consists of multiple electrode contacts (between 12 and 22 depending on the manufacturer), each of which is intended to stimulate a distinct population of auditory neurons. CIs attempt to mimic natural tonotopic encoding by representing high frequencies at the basal and low frequencies at the apical end of the array. e array is ideally placed in the lower compart­ment of the cochlea, the scala tympani, where it lies closer to target auditory neurons. Peri­modiolar electrodes are pre-curved and sit closer to target auditory neurons in the modiolus, while lateral wall electrodes are further from these neurons but are associated with less trau­matic insertion.
Sound processing refers to how the acoustic signal is transformed into an electrical stimulus and varies between device manufacturers. Most strategies decompose the signal into fre­quency bands and extract the envelope information (slow amplitude uctuations) and use this information to modulate electrical pulses at corresponding electrode contacts.
e Ear 97