Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4385_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
81 Мб
Скачать
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGTHE FACIAL NERVE
Figure 21.2 (A) Axial T1-weighted MRI with contrast showing enhancing nerve facial schwan-
noma lling the internal auditory meatus and extending along the greater supercial petrosal nerve into the middle fossa. (B) Coronal MRI showing a facial schwannoma arising from the geniculate ganglion and extending through the petrosal foramen into the middle fossa, pushing upwards into the temporal lobe.
highly specialised facial therapists. Additional support from an oculoplastic surgeon, expert radiologist, clinical photography and psychological services is advised. e development of support networks and groups has enabled patients to benet from the experience of others.
Physiotherapy
Tightness and shortening of the muscle bres can result in a ‘frozen face’. Specic guidance regarding muscle stretches allows the muscles to relax and facial symmetry to improve. Once the muscle length is restored, more active movement is usually achieved.
Chemodenervation with Botulinum Toxin
Botulinum toxin can be used to release the over-tightened facial muscles. In patients with synkinesis (unwanted muscle contractions resulting from aberrant reinnervation)
118 e Ear
21. THE FACIAL NERVE
VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
chemodenervation is helpful in reducing these unwanted movements. Chemodenervation can be employed to weaken the more active ‘normal’ facial muscles to achieve a more bal­anced facial appearance.
FACIAL REANIMATION
Reinnervation
Lack of recovery of facial function by 12 months is considered a permanent decit as loss of motor end-plate units likely means that reinnervation techniques will have no benecial eect. Prior to this point, nerve transfers including contralateral facial nerve, nerve to mas­seter and the hypoglossal nerve can be employed.
Static Reanimation
Periocular surgery, including lower-lid tightening, lateral canthopexy, brow li and upper eyelid positioning/weighting surgery may be performed under local anaesthesia and can provide benet for the patient with troublesome eye symptoms. Various face-liing tech­niques can improve the static position of the face.
Dynamic Reanimation
In those patients in whom active movement is desired, particularly in terms of smile, it is usually necessary to bring new tissue to the area. is may be in the form of muscle transfer, for example, a temporalis transfer or free muscle gra. In the latter case, innervation of the muscle gra may be from the facial nerve stump (e.g. in a cancer case) or more commonly the nerve to masseter or cross face nerve gra.
KEY POINTS
Most common cause is idiopathic (Bell’s palsy).
Slowly progressing weakness suggests space-occupying lesion (anywhere along the
course of the nerve).
Corticosteroids are the mainstay of acute management (antivirals indicated in
complete palsy).
Two-thirds of patients with Bell’s palsy recover completely by 6 months.
Established weakness should be managed in specialist multidisciplinary treatment.
Further Reading
1. Gagyor I, Madhok VB, Daly F, Sullivan F. Antiviral treatment for Bell’s palsy (idio­pathic facial paralysis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 9(9):CD001869. doi: 10.1002/
14651858.CD001869.pub9.
2. Peitersen E. e natural history of Bell’s palsy. Am J Otol. 1982; 4(2):107–111.
22. VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
Overview
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are the most common tumours of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) although, with an incidence of 33.8 tumours per 1,000,000 person-years, they remain rare clinical entities. ey are benign lesions t hat arise from abnorma l proliferation of Schwann cells along the vestibular divisions of the vestibulocochlear nerve (cranial nerve [CN] VIII).
e Ear 119
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGVESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
Table 22.1 Classication of VS according to size
Classication Grade Size (mm)
Grade 0 Intrameatal 0 Grade 1 Small 1–10 Grade 2 Medium 11–20 Grade 3 Moderately large 21–30 Grade 4 Large 31–40 Grade 5 Giant >40
a
Consensus Meeting on Reporting Systems on Vestibular Schwannomas (Kanzaki et al., 2003).
a
VS may be conne d to the interna l auditory cana l (IAC) or extend into the CPA. Uncommonly they can be entirely medial. Rarely, they can also invade the labyrinth. Current consensus is that the largest extrameatal dimension should be used to report tumour size (Table 22.1).
e diagnosis of VS relies mainly on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. VS are iso/ hypointense on T1- and T2-weighted sequences and they enhance avidly with contrast (gado­linium). T2-weighted imaging is adequate for diagnosis and monitoring, but a contrast-enhanced scan can help distinguish VS from other lesions, and fat suppression can diagnose lipomas. It is generally accepted that every patient with unilateral audiovestibular symptoms of unknown aeti­ology should undergo an MRI scan of the IACs. is is also true for patients presenting with sud­den sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), where an underlying VS is found in 1.9–4.9% of cases.
At diagnosis, the average tumour size is 10 mm but 33% are conned to the IAC. Approximately 30% of tumours demonstrate growth aer diagnosis (>2mm) with approxi- mately 10% showing regression and approximately 60% remaining stable. Tumour growth can, but rarely does, occur aer 5 years of radiological stability.
ose VS that demonstrate growth have a mean annual growth rate of 1.6–4.7mm. Over a 5-year period, 23% of purely intrameatal tumours will extend into the CPA.
Most tumours are solid, but cystic changes are seen in around 10% of tumours. Cystic changes are associated with more unpredictable tumour behaviour and some authors have reported that radiotherapy is less eective in these cases. Growing cystic tumours may therefore be considered earlier for surgery.
Overall, 95% of VS patients will suer from hearing loss, either at presentation or subse­quently (Table 22.2). It is usually progressive but it may be of sudden onset in up to 10% of neurobromatosis type 2 (NF2)-related tumours and 20% of sporadic tumours. Seventy percent of patients have tinnitus, usually not disturbing, and 50% have balance distur­bance at presentation. ere is no association between audiological symptoms and tumour size. Non-audiovestibular symptoms such as facial numbness, ataxia or headache may also develop but usually only occur with larger tumours. e most widely used hearing clas­sication systems for VS patients are the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classication (AAO-HNS) and the Word Recognition Scale (WRS).
Over a 10-year period of observation, 54% lose their AAO-HNS class A hearing level. Over the same period, those who had WRS class 0 hearing at presentation will deteriorate to class 2 or worse in 31% of patients.
Tumour Treatment
ere are three main treatment options: wait and rescan, radiotherapy and surgery.
Based on the current literature, a few general management principles can be established:
An initial wait and rescan approach is indicated for tumours below 20mm as long as
there is no signicant brainstem compression.
120 e Ear
22. VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
Table 22.2 Classication of hearing levels
a
Class
A 30 >70
B >30 and 50 50 C >50 50 D Any level <50
c
Class
0 100
I 70–99
II 50–69 III 1–49 IV 0
a
Class A and B hearing are referred to as ‘serviceable’, while class C and D are ‘non-serviceable’.
b
Pure-tone average: average thresholds (dB) at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz.
c
Class 0 and I hearing are considered ‘good’.
If signicant tumour growth occurs (>2 mm), active treatment (radiotherapy or sur-
gery) must be considered although it may be deferred if growth is slow and tumour size is small, or if there are medical contraindications or limited life expectancy, as around 20% of tumours stop growing aer a period of growth. Growing tumours up to around 25 mm may be treated with radiotherapy, although
surgery is an option depending on the patients risk preferences. Tumours larger than 25 mm are generally treated with surgical resection.
Pure-tone average (dB)
AAO-HNS (1995)
b
Word Recognition Scale
Speech discrimination scores (%)
Speech discrimination scores (%)
Radiotherapy
Two different types of radiotherapy treatment are currently available, stereotactic radio­surgery (SRS) and fractionated radiotherapy (FRT). SRS is generally given as a single dose of treatment. Two main types of radiotherapy are used: gamma radiation or elec­trons. The former is delivered by the Gamma Knife. The latter is delivered via a linear accelerator (LINAC) with several types of machines available that vary with regards to their method of targeting (e.g. Novalis and CyberKnife). A dose of 12–14Gy at the tumour margins is the usual dose used, which balances tumour control with risk of com­plication. In FRT, multiple treatment sessions are required (1.8–2Gy/day over 5–6 weeks or 5-7Gy/day over 3–5 fractions) and treatment is usually delivered using a LINAC. Accuracy is sub-millimetric with the head fixed by a tight mask for LINAC and by a frame fixed to the head in Gamma Knife.
e main objective of radiotherapy in VS is to stop tumour growth and avoid further need for surgical intervention. Tumours may transiently enlarge up to 24 months post-treatment, aer which they usually stabilise or regress. When a tumour begins or continues to enlarge aer that period, treatment failure is conrmed and surgery is generally indicated. e reported tumour-control rate following radiotherapy ranges from 92–98% over a 3- to 10-year follow­up period. Patients may experience various complications aer treatment, including:
Trigeminal neuropathy (0, 3–27%)
Facial nerve palsy and/or facial hemispasm (<2%)
Hydrocephalus (<1%; increased risk if CPA component >2.5cm)
Brain radionecrosis and/or stroke
Hearing loss
Induction of new tumours
Conversion of a benign tumour to a malignant one
e Ear 121
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGVESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
A recent meta-analysis found that of those that had serviceable hearing (AAO-HNS class A or B), only 25% of patients retain serviceable hearing aer 10 years of follow-up. Induction of new tumours and malignant transformation in the existing tumour are very rare, occur­ring in much less than 1% of patients per decade aer treatment. ese latter risks are less relevant to the older patient and make radiotherapy, with its relatively low morbidity, par­ticularly attractive to this group.
Surgery
Surgery is the treatment of choice for tumours >25 mm and may be oered instead of radio­therapy for smaller growing tumours, particularly in the younger age group. ree surgi­cal approaches are widely used to resect VS: translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid and middle fossa (Table 22.3). e retrolabyrinthine, transcochlear and endoscopic transpromontorial approaches have also been described.
Table 22.3 Surgical approaches to the CPA
Surgical approach Key surgical steps Advantages Disadvantages
Translabyrinthine 1 Skin and periosteal ap
2 Extended cortical
mastoidectomy 3 Bony labyrinthectomy 4 Jugular bulb and facial
nerve skeletonisation 5 IAM skeletonisation 6 Identication of the
facial nerve (lateral
portion of the IAM) 7 Opening of the
posterior fossa dura 8 Tumour removal 9 Closure (with
abdominal fat graft)
Middle fossa 1 Skin incision and
division of temporalis
muscle 2 Middle fossa
craniectomy 3 Extradural approach to
the middle fossa oor
and posterior fossa 4 IAM skeletonisation 5 Identication of facial
and vestibular nerves 6 Tumour removal 7 Closure
Retrosigmoid 1 Skin and soft tissue
incisions 2 Retrosigmoid
craniectomy 3 Dural opening and CSF
decompression 4 Intradural approach to
the tumour 5 Tumour removal (± IAC
drilling) 6 Closure
1 Extradural drilling 2 No cerebellar
retraction
3 Early identication
of the facial nerve (lateral end of the IAC)
4 VS of any size can
be removed
5 Immediate repair of
facial nerve possible
1 Hearing preservation
(possible)
2 No cerebellar
retraction 3 Extradural drilling 4 Good access to the
lateral end of the
IAM compared with
retrosigmoid
1 Hearing
preservation
(possible) 2 Excellent
visualisation of the
CPA
1 No hearing
preservation
2 Increased incidence
of postop CSF leaks
1 Facial nerve
between the surgeon and the tumour (unfavorable position)
2 Temporal lobe
retraction with risk of epilepsy
3 Removal of tumour
with a maximal CPA dimension of 10–15 mm
1 Intradural drilling 2 Cerebellar
retraction
3 Increased incidence
of postoperative headache
4 Limited access to
the lateral portion of the IAM
122 e Ear
22. VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
Both the middle fossa and retrosigmoid approaches oer the potential benet of hearing preservation. is is also true for the retrolabyrinthine approach. To preserve hearing, the tumour must be small (maximal CPA component of <10 mm) and not extend up to the fundus of the IAC. Approximately 50% of patients retain serviceable hearing 10 years aer surgery. However, hearing preservation rates vary widely depending on the surgical approach used.
ere are two main factors aecting surgical outcomes and postoperative complication rates: tumour size (most important) and experience/surgical skills of the skull base unit. While mortality is rare (1%), surgical excision of a VS is a major surgical intervention that has a wide range of potential complications, the most common of which is cerebrospinal uid (CSF) leakage. e leak may occur through the wound, from the external ear canal or from the nose via the Eustachian tube. Minor leaks may be managed conservatively with a lum­bar drain. More severe CSF leaks are managed with blind sac closure and Eustachian tube obliteration, with or without CSF lumbar drainage. Refractory leaks will rarely require per­manent CSF diversion (<1%).
e facial nerve is in close proximity to the tumour and its preservation is a key aim of sur­gery. Most series report the following facial nerve outcomes, using the House-Brackmann (HB) classication:
0–15 mm: 80–95% HB grade I–II with 100% anatomical preservation
>15 –25 mm: 80–90% HB grade I–II with 90% anatomical preservation
>25 mm: 50–70% HB grade I–II with 65–80% anatomical preservation
Recurrence rate aer surgery is mainly inuenced by the completeness of resection. Following gross total excision, recurrence is observed in 1–3% of cases. For near-total (lin­ear remnant of tumour adherent to the facial nerve) and subtotal resections (solid mass of tumour le behind), regrowth rates can reach up to 21% and 22%, respectively. e tumour residuum may necessitate further treatment by radiotherapy or surgery depending on its size and whether or not it is growing on radiological follow-up.
Neurobromatosis Type 2 (NF2)
NF2 is a genetic condition associated with the development of numerous tumours involv­ing the nervous system. e disorder is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. In around 50% of cases, patients do not have any positive family history and present with a de novo mutation. Among de novo cases, up to 60% display somatic mosaicism, where one cell lineage with a mutated NF2 gene and one without any mutation develop throughout the body. In the presence of mosaicism, mutation is postzygotic and patients have more localised manifestations with less severe phenotypes. Because of mosaicism, the transmis­sion rate in de novo cases is below 50%. In the second generation and beyond, transmission is 50%, as children inheriting NF2 from a mosaic parent will have the NF2 mutation in their germline.
e NF2 gene is located on chromosome 22q12.2 and encodes the NF2 protein, also known as merlin or schwannomin. is cell cytoskeleton–associated protein is involved in cell growth inhibition. e loss of these tumour-suppressor functions is believed to be the main factor in the formation of all schwannomas and meningiomas. A range of mutation types has been identied in NF2 including missense, truncating and splice site mutations and deletions. ere is a strong genotype/phenotype relationship with missense mutations being associated with milder disease compared with truncating mutations.
e birth incidence of NF2 in the United Kingdom is estimated at 1 in 33,000 live births. By 60 years of age, almost every NF2 pat ient will be sy mptomatic. Bilateral VS are almost pathogno­monic in NF2 and 95% of patients will develop bilateral tumours by the age of 30. Schwannomas may also aect other cranial, spinal and peripheral nerves. Approximately 50% of patients have
e Ear 123
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGVESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
intracranial or spinal meningiomas. Less frequently, they can develop other low-grade intracra­nial tumours, such as ependymomas. Ophthalmic abnormalities are also frequently encoun­tered (e.g. 60–80% cataracts). Over the years, dierent clinical diagnostic criteria have been proposed, among which the ‘Revised Manchester criteria’ is the most widely used.
When NF2 is suspected, contrast-enhanced MRI scanning of the head and whole spine must be performed. At-risk individuals requiring further investigations must meet one of the fol­lowing criteria:
Positive family history of NF2
<30 years old presenting with unilateral VS and/or meningioma
Multiple spinal tumours (schwannomas and/or meningiomas)
Cutaneous schwannomas
e screening protocol for VS in asymptomatic at-risk patients is as follows:
Genetic screening
Start MRI screening from age 10
10–20 years: MRI every 2 years
21–40 years: MRI every 3–5 years (because this group have slower growing
tu mours)
If genetic screening negative and no tumour by age 40 then discharge
NF2 can also be diagnosed by identifying pathological mutations in patients’ blood, with a success rate of 93% in non-mosaic cases. e presence of the NF2 mutation in blood is much lower in mosaic cases.
Overall, 60% of patients with NF2 have bilateral VS at their initial assessment. VS in NF2 tend to be more aggressive than sporadic tumours, but behavior is inuenced by genotype/ mosaicism. Overall 65% of NF2 VS demonstrate growth over time, with an average growth rate of 2mm/year. Over the course of their disease, most patients will develop bilateral pro­found deafness either as a result of the tumour or treatment.
Historically, VS treatment in NF2 has been mainly surgical. A conservative approach is, however, indicated for small- or medium-sized stable or very slow growing tumours. New systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody of vascular endothelial growth factor A, have demonstrated considerable ecacy in controlling VS growth and may also preserve audiological function. In a limited number of cases, radiotherapy may be con­sidered, although control is less eective compared with sporadic tumours. ere is also a greater risk of inducing new tumours within the radiotherapy eld and of inducing malig­nant change in previously treated tumours (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours) compared with sporadic tumours, especially if treated at a young age.
Optimising hearing rehabilitation in NF2 is critical as bilateral hearing loss has a very sig­nicant impact on quality of life. In those who develop profound hearing loss in an ear with a stable tumour (whether through its natural behaviour or through treatment with radiotherapy/bevacizumab) there is now good evidence for the eectiveness of cochlear implantation. Similarly, there is good evidence that, in selected cases, tumour removal with preservation of the cochlear nerve together with cochlear implantation oers reasonable hearing outcomes. Outcomes are, however, less good in NF2 than the average non-NF2 cochlear implant user, with untreated ears having the best outcome and those having had radiotherapy or nerve-preserving surgery having poorer outcomes. For most patients hav­ing surgery, cochlear nerve preservation is not possible and the only way to provide some audition is through auditory brainstem implantation (ABI). ese provide environmen­tal sound awareness and act as an aid to lipreading in most cases. Only 10% of recipients achieve open-set speech discrimination. Both cochlear implantation and ABI have a non­user rate of around 20% in NF2.
124 e Ear
LESIONS OF THE CEREBELLOPONTINE ANGLE, PETROUS APEX AND JUGULAR FORAMEN
KEY POINTS
Sporadic and NF2-related VS are rare benign slow-growing tumours originating from
the vestibular divisions of CN VIII.
They most often present with hearing loss, tinnitus or balance disturbance.
While there is no correlation between tumour size and hearing loss at presentation,
other non-audiological symptoms are associated with larger tumour size.
MRI scan with contrast is the diagnostic modality of choice for VS and must be
performed in the presence of unilateral or asymmetric audiovestibular symptoms of unknown aetiology.
NF2 is an autosomal dominant disorder associated with a mutation on chromosome
22q12.2. Bilateral VS is almost pathognomonic of this condition.
Small- or medium-sized VS may be managed conservatively (watch and wait) with
only 30% demonstrating growth. Growing small- or medium-sized tumours may be managed with surgical resection or with radiotherapy. Large tumours (>3cm) are generally managed with surgical resection. In NF2, systemic drug therapies, such as bevacizumab, have demonstrated signicant efcacy in controlling tumour growth.
Radiotherapy has a high tumour control rate (92–98%) and low short-term
complication rates. Hearing loss increases greater than it would otherwise do following treatment and there is a small risk of inducing new tumours or inducing malignant change in the treated tumour in the long run.
Surgery is the treatment of choice for large tumours or following radiotherapy failure.
It is also a viable option for growing small- and medium-sized VS. There is a risk of facial palsy, which increases with increasing tumour size.
22. VESTIBULAR SCHwANNOMA
Further Reading
Borsetto D., Faccioli C., and Zanoletti E., Sporadic acoustic neuroma: current treatment
options with focus on hearing outcome. Hearing, Balance and Communication, 2018. 16(4): p. 248–254.
Carlson M.L. (Ed.), Comprehensive Management of Vestibular Schwannoma, New York:
ieme, 2019.
Kanzaki J, Tos M, Sanna M, et al. New and modied reporting systems from the consen-
sus meeting on systems for reporting results in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24(4): 642–648.
23. LESIONS OF THE CEREBELLOPONTINE ANGLE, PETROUS APEX AND JUGULAR FORAMEN
Introduction
Most conditions of the petrous apex (PA), cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and jugular foramen (JF) can be distinguished by using a combination of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) without the need for biopsy (Table 23.1). Bony destruction in the CT is sugges- tive of a malignant process, whereas well-dened expansion is indicative of a benign process.
Petrous Apex Lesions
Anatomy
e PA is the anteromedial pyramid-shaped portion of the petrous temporal bone.
It is divided into two compartments by the internal auditory meatus: an anterior por-
tion, principally consisting of bone marrow/air cells and a posterior portion, from the dense bone of the otic capsule (Figure 23.1).
e Ear 125
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGLESIONS OF THE CEREBELLOPONTINE ANGLE, PETROUS APEX AND JUGULAR FORAMEN
Table 23.1 Conditions of the PA, CPA and JF with characteristic radiological ndings
MRI
Pathology Location CT
Cholesterol
Granuloma
Asymmetric
marrow
Epidermoid cyst PA/CPA Expansile No High signal on DWI Mucocele PA Expansile No DWI with no restricted
Meningioma PA/CPA/JF Hyperostosis /↑ →/Yes Dural tail, calcication Arachnoid cyst CPA CSF density No Same signal as CSF Schwannoma CPA/JF Isodense to
Paraganglioma JF Expansile Yes ‘Salt and pepper’
Lipoma CPA Fat density No Saturation on T1 fat
Chordoma Clivus Chondrosarcoma PA/petro-
Metastasis,
myeloma
Sarcoma,
Langerhans cell histiocytosis
Petrositis PA / Rim-
PA Expansile No Peripheral low-signal
PA No expansile
changes
the brain
occipital ssure
PA/CPA
PA ↓ age
Aggressive Bony
destruction
T1 T2 Contrast Peculiarity
hemosiderin ring (T2) Consistency on T2 can be variable reecting contents
No Saturation on T1 fat
sequences
diffusion
/ Ye s Can contain cystic
areas
appearance in larger lesions
sequences
/ Ye s Honeycomb
enhancement
age
/↓ →/Yes
Meningeal thickening,
enhancing
enhancing Meckel cave, cranial nerves (especially cranial nerves V and VI)
e tentorium inserts onto the petrous ridge to separate the middle and posterior
cranial fossae. Relations of the PA include the petro-occipital ssure and clivus (medial), the inner
ear (lateral), the petrous carotid artery as it exits the foramen lacerum (anterior), the CPA (posterior), the jugular bulb and inferior petrosal sinus (inferior), the middle cranial fossa and Meckel’s cave (superior). Dorello’s canal carries the sixt h cranial nerve and is found at the medial end of petrous
ridge at the conuence of the inferior petrosal and cavernous sinus.
Clinical Conditions
Cholesterol granulomas and epidermoids: Cholesterol cysts or granulomas are
thought to arise from haemorrhage into the air cell system causing an inammatory reaction. Causative theories for this bleeding include Eustachian tube dysfunction and marrow exposed to the air cell system. Epidermoid lesions are thought to origi­nate from transplantation of epithelial cell rests by the laterally migrating optic and
126 e Ear
LESIONS OF THE CEREBELLOPONTINE ANGLE, PETROUS APEX AND JUGULAR FORAMEN
Figure 23.1 Anatomy of the petrous apex. IAM, internal auditory meatus.
otic capsules or developing neurovasculature. While cholesterol granulomas oen present with uctuating conductive hearing loss (presumably related to Eustachian tube dysfunction or cyst content leakage), epidermoids are more likely to present with progres­sive sensorineural hearing loss. Epidermoids may present with progressive facial nerve palsy while cholesterol granulomas rarely do. Trigeminal neuralgia, otalgia and ear pain can feature in cholesterol granulomas but this is unusual for epidermoids. Epidermoids show low signal on Tl-weighted images, while cholesterol granulomas exhibit high signal. Both types of cyst give high signal on T2-weighted images, but they can exhibit signal inhomogeneity depending on the nature and amount of cyst content.
22. VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA
Factors that must be considered when considering treatment approach include patient’s symptoms, life expectancy and surgical anatomy. Neural decits are rarely reversed by sur­gery. Figure 23.2 shows a proposed approach to management. Most cholesterol cysts can be drained into the mastoid or sphenoid system, allowing hearing to be retained. Approaches include the infra-labyrinthine and infra-cochlear approach (both limited by the height of the jugular bulb) and the trans-sphenoidal approach (limited by the position of the carotid). Drainage is associated with higher recurrence rate. For patients with facial palsy, pain, recur­rent cysts and without serviceable hearing, resection may be favoured. A middle fossa, or subtotal petrosectomy + cochlear drill out may be used for small cysts, whilst an infratem­poral fossa type B approach can be used for larger lesions.
Infection: Petrous apicitis may present with middle ear infection, retro-orbital pain
and sixth nerve palsy. Tumours: Chordomas arise from notochord remnants and are locally malignant
(regional metastasis rare) and have a high tendency to recur. Chordomas almost always arise in the midline, and spread to the PA is common. ey can present indolently with headache, visual disturbance or lower cranial nerve palsies. Chondrosarcomas likely develop from cartilaginous remnants from development. ey too present insidiously and can cause various cranial nerve palsies. Surgery is considered the standard of care in the treatment of skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Radiation therapy, in the form of proton beam therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or conventional fractionated radiation, is oen used as adjuvant therapy.
e Ear 127