Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4385_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
81 Мб
Скачать
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGSENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
e main aim in evaluating a patient with SNHL is to identify any treatable causes, and the provision of supportive treatment. e speed of onset of symptoms, laterality, and accompa­nying otological symptoms should be questioned. Previous otological conditions or surgery, a history of trauma (including barotrauma), or intense noise exposure as well as a recent viral infection may help to identify a cause. A full drug history, particularly aminoglycosides and chemotherapy, is important in considering ototoxicity. A strong family history of early-onset HL (before the age of 40) may indicate a genetic cause.
Examination should include otoscopy, tuning fork tests, cranial nerve examination, and audiometry. Speech testing can help determine the impact of the HL. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the internal auditory meatus should be performed in cases of asym­metrical HL (asymmetry on pure-tone audiometry of 15 dB or more at any two adjacent test frequencies, using test frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz; NICE 2020) to exclude a vestibu­lar schwannoma or other intracranial pathology. Blood testing may be helpful to exclude an autoimmune or infective cause.
General Management of Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Guidance should be given to patients to optimise their acoustic environment, and they should be oered psychological counseling if their HL is having a negative impact on their mood. Management may include provision of hearing aids/auditory implants, auditory reha­bilitation, and the use of hearing assistance technology (see Chapter 17).
Specic Conditions
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL)
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is dened as HL of rapid onset of 30 dB over greater than three consecutive frequencies developing over 72 hours with a subjective sensa­tion of hearing impairment. e majority of cases are idiopathic, with a cause identied in only 5–10% of cases. Routine laboratory testing is not advised, although one might consider specic blood tests (e.g. Lyme disease serology, autoantibodies, etc.) depending on the clinical history. e possible causes of ‘idiopathic’ cases include labyrinthine viral infection, vascular insult, intracochlear membrane rupture, and autoimmune inner ear disease. However, epide­miological, serological, and histopathological evidence to support these theories are inconclu­sive. In general, the shorter the history the better the prognosis. Age >60 years, the presence of vertigo, and a more severe HL with a down-sloping audiogram are all features associated with a poorer prognosis. Spontaneous recovery occurs in 32–65% of cases, typically within 2–6 weeks, even without treatment. Evidence is poor for the various proposed treatments due to the combination of low incidence and high spontaneous recovery rate. Studies using agents other than those detailed below, including antivirals, do not oer any signicant benet.
Specic Management
Steroids
Oral steroids are the standard treatment of SSNHL despite systematic reviews and meta­analyses revealing limited evidence of benet. Treatment started within 2 weeks of onset is associated with the greatest hearing recovery; there is minimal benet aer 4–6 weeks. A 10- to 14-day course of once-daily oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg [maximum 60 mg]) is associ­ated with better outcomes.
Intratympanic (IT) steroid therapy results in higher inner ear steroid levels than oral therapy. e main advantage is a reduction in systemic side eects; therefore, it can be valuable in dia­betics or patients who cannot take systemic corticosteroids. Dexamethasone and methylpred­nisolone sodium succinate are the most frequently used preparations. ere is no evidence on which steroid is superior; however, better hearing outcomes have been associated with higher doses and the cumulative eect of multiple administrations. Commonly this is administered via a grommet or injected intratympanically under local anaesthetic with the patient lying in a supine position and the injected ear facing towards the ceiling for approximately 30 minutes
78 e Ear
14. SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
to facilitate diusion of the drug across the round window membrane. Diusion across the round window membrane is variable and leads to unpredictable intracochlear bioavailability. Risks of IT administration include pain, dizziness, and persistent tympanic membrane per­foration at the site of injection. No comparative trials have shown superiority of primary IT steroid therapy over oral steroids with respect to hearing outcomes; however, combination therapy has been shown to improve overall hearing compared with oral treatment alone.
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) delivers 100% oxygen at >1 atm pressure resulting in increas ed tissue oxygenation and aids the re sponse to infection a nd ischaemia. Compl ications of treatment are rare but include barotrauma to ears, sinuses, and lungs; temporary worsen­ing of short-sightedness; claustrophobia; and oxygen poisoning. It is an expensive and time­consuming treatment given over days or weeks and is not widely available. However, some benet has been shown when initiated within 3 months of the onset of HL; the benet is potentially greater in cases of severe to profound HL. Studies have shown some benet of both IT steroids and HBOT as salvage therapies for refractory SSNHL.
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL)
e eect of noise exposure on individuals is highly variable. Sound levels <80 dB(A) at any length of exposure will not cause damage to the human ear. Sounds 130 dB(A) will de­nitely cause damage, even if the exposure time is short. Between these levels, the ‘safe’ period of exposure decreases as the sound level increases, in a logarithmic fashion. Doubling the sound intensity (3-dB increase) eectively ‘doubles the noise dose’, which means exposure is only safe for half the time period. is is described as the ‘equal energy principle’. It only applies approximately in animal experiments.
Initially, excessive noise exposure causes a temporary threshold shi (TTS), resulting in a temporary HL. e high-frequency regions of the cochlea are most sensitive (between 3 and 6 kHz). Recovery of the TTS occurs over hours, days, or weeks following exposure. Expected recovery time is dependent on the loudness and duration of the noise presented. However, a permanent threshold shi (PTS) can occur at the initial insult, or it may evolve where there is continuous or repeated excessive noise exposure at levels that would only have otherwise caused a TTS. It is thought that this may be caused by metabolic factors such as excessive neurotransmitter release, changes in cochlear blood ow, and oxidative stress within the hair cells. Structural factors like depolymerisation of actin laments in the stereocilia, swelling of the stria vascularis, and damage to aerent nerve endings and supporting cells are also thought to play a part. Synaptic connections between inner hair cells and spiral ganglion cells may also be susceptible to noise damage. Importantly, in animal studies, these synapses can be the rst site of damage, even without an HL (‘hidden hearing loss’, or synaptopathy). Additionally, genetic susceptibility, smoking and cardiovascular disease, and diabetes have been implicated as risk factors.
Patients present with symptoms of HL and tinnitus alongside a history of excessive noise expo­sure, which may be occupational or recreational. It is more common in men. Hyperacusis may be a feature causing accompanying distress and impaired social functioning. Acoustic shock is a particular subgroup of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). It appears more oen in women, particularly in call centres, and occurs aer exposure to a brief but unexpected loud and unpleasant sound. Acoustic shock appears to cause high levels of psychological distress associ­ated with symptoms of hyperacusis, otalgia, tinnitus, and imbalance. Objective HL is rare.
When assessing a patient with NIHL, volunteered post-exposure tinnitus suggests that TTS was present. It is important to detail all potential sources of noise exposure, typical noise lev­els and periods of exposure, and any hearing protection used. A high-tone HL with a notch at 3/4/6 kHz may be present, but it may not be obvious and it is not diagnostic. Signicant asymmetrical thresholds may be present in military personnel due to the shadow eect from the head when using shoulder-borne weapons.
e Ear 79
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGSENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
e main aim in (medicolegal) assessment is to separate the eects of ageing and any other idiopathic or degenerative component from that of the noise exposure. Standardised refer­ence tables provide hearing thresholds at various ages for typical screened and unscreened populations. Comparing the patients’ (or claimants’) hearing thresholds against expected ‘average’ values for age-related and idiopathic causes should allow an estimate of any excess HL caused by noise exposure.
Specic Management
NIHL is a preventable health condition. Employers have a statutory duty under the Health and Safety Work Act 1974 to minimise risks to employees from excessive noise exposure. e Noise at Work Regulations 1989 were superseded by the European Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 to describe action levels at 80 and 85 dB(A) for daily personal noise expo­sure, and a peak action level of 135 dB(A). At these levels, the employer has a responsibility to conduct noise surveys and provide employees with hearing protection as well as regular hearing assessments and a programme of employee education. ese actions are compulsory when noise levels reach 85 dB(A). Personal hearing protection can be in the form of earplugs or earmus; earmus are more reliable. Electronic active noise reduction (ANR) systems are eective but expensive and are most commonly used in military and aircra environments.
Age-Related Hearing Loss
Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is a progressive, bilateral, sensorineural hearing impair­ment of mid to late adult onset (typically starting between the ages of 40 and 60 years) in the absence of any other cause of HL. Once hearing thresholds have deteriorated to approxi­mately 75–80 dB HL, further progression appears to be slow.
ARHL is associated with male gender. ere is likely to be a signicant genetic association, and recent gene-mapping studies have identied new and previously unrecognised genetic loci that are relevant to ARHL. Noise exposure, smoking, alcohol consumption, hyperten­sion, blood hyperviscosity, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease have all been suggested as possible contributory factors in developing ARHL.
Other degenerative processes in the central nervous system such as reduced neuronal plas­ticity, loss of cognitive abilities, and loss of other sensory modalities, particularly vision, can massively increase the impact of HL in the elderly. is also explains why the elderly oen require a long acclimatisation period to obtain maximum benet from hearing rehabilitation and aids. ARHL is associated with cognitive impairment including dementia, depression, and an increased incidence of falls. It has been recognised as one of the most signicant of a number of modiable risk factors active in the development of dementia. Early recognition of the need for, and encouraging the use of, hearing aids may in turn reduce the development of these psychosocial comorbidities.
Most commonly the audiogram shows an HL which tends to be worse at the higher frequen­cies. In an individual over the age of 60, with normal examination ndings and a symmetri­cal (oen predominantly high-tone) HL, a diagnosis of ARHL is fairly secure. However, in younger patients, a diagnosis of genetic, ‘non-syndromic’ HL should be considered.
Genetic Hearing Loss
Non-syndromic SNHL accounts for approximately 70% of genetic SNHL cases. e remain­ing 30% are recognised as being part of a syndrome. e inheritance pattern can be auto­somal dominant, recessive, X-linked, or mitochondrial. A genetic HL may be recognised when it is observed that several generations of family members have been aected. However, de novo mutation or, a reduced penetrance inheritance pattern, may cause a singleton case. Linkage analysis combined with whole genome/exome sequence analysis enables the iden­tication of novel genes and pathways causing inherited SNHL. To date more than 60 loci for genes causing HL have been mapped, but only just over half of the specic genes have been identied.
80 e Ear
14. SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
e audiometric pattern observed in genetic HL can vary. Some mutations result in a low-frequency HL, whereas others result in a steeply down-sloping HL involving the high frequencies. A ‘U-shaped’ or ‘cookie-bite’ audiogram is caused by an HL aecting the mid­frequencies. Although some SNHL loci are associated with particular audiometric patterns or clinical presentations, there is marked variability: the age of onset of HL, progression, and audiometric conguration can vary between individuals even within one family, mak­ing distinction between genetic causes dicult. Achieving a molecular genetic diagnosis through genetic testing may help to predict the progress of HL and guide genetic counsel­ling. is is likely to be a more rewarding process in familial clusters rather than isolated singleton cases.
Ototoxicity
Table 14.2 summarises known ototoxic agents and their mechanisms of action. ese agents
enter the inner ear through various mechanisms where they can cause damage. Entry is predominantly via the blood supply into the perilymph, although the precise mechanism of diusion across this blood-perilymph barrier is unknown. Endolymph can be accessed via perilymph through selectively permeable membranes and tight junctions between adjacent cells. Diusion can also occur via the round and oval windows from the middle ear. Any hearing decit caused by hair cell loss is usually permanent as the organ of Corti cannot spontaneously regenerate hair cells
Temporary Hearing Loss
Agents aecting ion transport across epithelia, such as loop diuretics, cause oedema of the stria vascularis. is alters the endolymph composition, resulting in a reduction in endoco­chlear potential (EP) leading to a TTS associated with a pan-frequency HL. e eects are completely reversible once administration is stopped, although this may take several days.
When administered in high doses (i.e. 2–5 g/day), salicylates penetrate the blood-perilymph barrier easily and inhibit the activity of outer hair cells (OHCs). e degree of HL is directly proportional to the serum and perilymph drug concentration. Quinines and their deriva­tives can act as nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, disrupting synaptic transmis­sion on inner and outer hair cells and/or spiral ganglion neurons. Vestibular hair cells may be aected too, resulting in vertiginous symptoms.
Permanent Hearing Loss and Balance
Aminoglycosides
All aminoglycosides are potentially both cochleo- and vestibulo-toxic, but they vary in their site of maximal eect, for reasons unknown.
Within the inner ear, aminoglycosides specically target hair cells blocking the mechano­transduction channels at the tips of stereocilia. Apoptosis occurs once a certain concentra­tion of the drug has been reached within the cell. Reactive oxygen free radical production may also play a role. OHC loss occurs rst; inner hair cells are relatively spared but can be lost later. Subsequently, the spiral ganglion neurons that supply aerent innervation to the hair cells are lost.
In the vestibule hair cell loss occurs rst in the central epithelia of the utricular and saccular maculae, before spreading towards the peripheries.
Toxic eects usually appear aer repeated systemic treatment, although even a single topi­cal application to the middle ear cavity can initiate damage. e damage progresses even aer administration has ceased and symptoms may not present until aer the patient has completed a course of the oending drug. It must be stressed that vestibular symptoms with clinically used drugs such as gentamicin precede HL eects, and should be sought rst. Bilateral vestibular damage results in oscillopsia and severe unsteadiness that is worse in the dark. Hearing impairment initially occurs in the high frequencies and progresses to include successively lower frequencies.
e Ear 81
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGSENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
Table 14.2 The effects of medication on sensorineural hearing loss
Mechanism of action
Classication Compounds
Aminoglycoside
antibiotics
Most cochleotoxic = neomycin,
followed by gentamicin, kanamycin, and tobramycin
Least cochleotoxic = amikacin and
netilmicin
Most vestibulotoxic =
streptomycin and gentamicin
and notes
Blockade of mechano-
transduction channels at stereocilia tips, apoptosis of hair cells, and production of reactive oxygen free radicals
Mutations in the gene that
encodes 12s ribosomal mitochondrial DNA, including the ‘A1555G’ mutation (prevalence
0.19–1% prevalence) severely increases cochlear but not vestibular susceptibility to aminoglycoside toxicity
Impaired renal function increases
susceptibility to damage
Loop diuretics Bumetanide, ethacrynic acid,
frusemide (furosemide), piretanide
Disrupt ion transport across
epithelia within the inner ear, resulting in oedema of stria vascularis and reversible TTS and pan-frequency hearing loss
Effects are reversible once
administration is stopped, although it may take several days
Macrolide antibiotics Erythromycin, azithromycin,
Similar to that of loop diuretics
clarithromycin
Other antibiotics Ampicillin, capreomycin,
Specic mechanism unknown chloramphenicol, colistin (polymyxin E), minocycline, polymyxin B, rifampicin, vancomycin, viomycin
Antitumor agents Cisplatin (cis-platinum),
carboplatin, oxaliplatin (carboplatin and oxaliplatin are less ototoxic than cisplatin)
Similar to that of aminoglycosides,
but has additional effects on spiral ganglion cells and causes atrophy of stria vascularis
Actinomycin, bleomycin, nitrogen
mustards (e.g. mustine), misonidazole
Anti-inammatory
agents
Salicylate (aspirin) Direct inhibition of OHCs causes Fenoprofen, ibuprofen,
reversible TTS
indomethacin, naproxen, phenylbutazone,
Antimalarials Quinine, chloroquine Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
antagonism causing disruption of synaptic transmission within inner ear cells and reversible TTS
May also cause vertigo
Iron chelators Desferrioxamine Specic mechanism unknown Beta blockers Practolol, propranolol Specic mechanism unknown Contraceptives Medroxyprogesterone Specic mechanism unknown Industrial chemicals Trimethyltin, toluene,
trichloroethylene, styrene, xylene
Note: OHC, outer hair cell; TTS, temporary threshold shift.
Loss of OHCs with predilection for
middle and apical turns of cochlea
82 e Ear
14. SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
e dose, drug, route, and duration of administration can inuence the degree of impair­ment. Standard dosing safe levels are not calibrated for vestibular toxicity. Impaired renal function increases susceptibility to damage. Mutations in the gene that encodes 12s ribo­somal mitochondrial DNA, including the ‘A1555G’ mutation (adenosine to guanosine sub­stitution at base position 1555), severely increases cochlear but not vestibular susceptibility to aminoglycoside toxicity. Estimates of the prevalence of A1555G mutation vary from 0.19 to 1% in dierent ethnic populations, with a carrier rate of 17%.
Cisplatin
A degree of hearing impairment aects >60% of patients treated with current protocols of cis­platin. HL is bilateral, rst in the extended high frequencies then progresses with cumulative doses into the speech frequencies. HL can progress aer administration has stopped, possibly due to prolonged retention of platinum in the body. e pattern of cochlear hair cell damage greatly resembles that of aminoglycosides, although vestibular hair cells are relatively spared. Cisplatin additionally aects the spiral ganglion cells, causes atrophy of the stria vascularis, and increases the susceptibility to NIHL for several years aer treatment has nished.
ere are many proposed systems for monitoring hearing during platinum chemotherapy treatment, though adherence is sparse. e minimum requirement (adults) is for a baseline audiogram, retest if complaint of HL arises, and exit audiometry. In children more regular age-appropriate testing is required during treatment. Detection of HL is increased with more frequent testing and when extended high-frequency audiometry (10–16 kHz) is used.
KEY POINTS
Approximately 50% of idiopathic SSNHL cases will improve spontaneously; oral or IT
steroids have limited conclusive evidence of efcacy, but if used should be initiated as soon as possible.
In the assessment of NIHL one must consider the individual contributions of age and
idiopathic and noise-related components that can result in HL.
AHRL is inevitable, and it can be associated with increased social isolation and
impaired cognitive functioning.
An underlying genetic cause should be considered in younger patients presenting with
bilateral SNHL.
Ototoxic agents exert their effect on the inner ear via different pathways to cause
disruption of the EP and damage and apoptosis of hair cells and spiral ganglion cells.
The mainstay of assessment of SNHL is to identify any potentially reversible causes.
The general treatment is with hearing amplication and specic therapy for any accompanying physical or psychosocial symptoms.
15. TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
Denitions and Classication
Tinnitus is defined as the conscious perception of an auditory sensation in the absence of a corresponding external stimulus. Most tinnitus comprises simple sounds like whis­tling, buzzing, humming, or ringing, but more complex sounds such as distant voices or even music are occasionally reported. Somatosensory tinnitus is a subtype in which the percept can be altered by physical contact or movement, particularly of the cervical spine or jaw. Some tinnitus has a rhythmical nature, which may be synchronous with the heart­beat in which case it is dened as pulsatile tinnitus (Table 15.1) and a vascular origin is
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGTINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
Table 15.1 Pathological causes of pulsatile tinnitus
Type of pathology Specic pathology
Vascular Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease Arterial Arteriovenous stula
Arteriovenous malformation Intracranial aneurysm Dissection of the carotid artery
Venous Jugular bulb abnormalities
Dural venous sinus stenosis Abnormal condylar or mastoid emissary veins
Microvascular Glomus tumour
Meningioma of middle ear Cavernous haemangioma
Circulatory Increased cardiac output (anaemia, thyrotoxicosis,
pregnancy)
Aortic murmurs Perceptual Conductive hearing loss Other Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome
likely. Pulse-asynchronous rhythmical tinnitus may have an underlying muscular origin, arising from myoclonus of palatal or intratympanic muscles. Most tinnitus is subjective in that it can only be detected by the aected person. Occasionally, particularly with some types of rhythmical tinnitus, it is possible for others to hear a sound and in this case the tinnitus is objective. Disorders of sound tolerance are subdivided: hyperacusis is dislike of all sounds above a certain intensity; misophonia is dislike of particular sounds, irrespec­tive of the level of those sounds; and phonophobia is fear of particular sounds. Confusingly, hyperacusis is also used as an umbrella term for all disorders of sound tolerance.
Epidemiology
Estimates of tinnitus prevalence vary from 5.1–42.7% but a large UK study suggested a point prevalence of 10.1% in adults. Approximately 1 in 30 adults have tinnitus that is moderately annoying and 1 in 200 have tinnitus that severely aects their ability to lead a normal life. Prevalence increases with age up to the seventh decade of life: some studies show the prevalence continuing to increase thereaer, whereas others show it plateauing or even dropping. Tinnitus prevalence is similar in men and women. Children are less likely than adults to volunteer that they have tinnitus but when asked directly, the prevalence is not dissimilar to that in adults. Tinnitus is more common in people with hearing loss, but the degree of hearing loss corresponds poorly with the severity of tinnitus. About 1 in 10 people with tinnitus have normal hearing as measured by pure-tone audiometry and conversely, tinnitus can also exist aer division of the auditory nerve. ere are few longitudinal studies of tinnitus, but those that are available suggest that for most people the natural history is for tinnitus to become less intrusive with time. e prevalence of hyperacusis is unclear.
Pathophysiology
ere are multiple theories regarding the underlying cause of tinnitus and it is possible that there are multiple mechanisms. It is suggested that tinnitus emergence is a two-stage process: an initial trigger, which may be in the peripheral or central auditory systems, or even from parts of the brain outside the classical auditory pathways. is is followed by changes in the central auditory system and associated non-auditory areas of the brain, particularly areas
84 e Ear
15. TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
involved with emotion and arousal, resulting in the persistence and distress of the symp­tom. Mechanisms that have been proposed include reorganisation of the brain’s tonotopic map following deaerentation, increased spontaneous neuronal ring, increased neuronal synchrony, failure of inhibitory pathways, or errors of predictive coding. e initial trigger can be any form of hearing loss including noise-induced hearing loss, presbycusis, or senso­rineural loss secondary to administration of ototoxic drugs. Many patients, however, report that their hearing did not change; instead, they feel that the trigger was a life event such as a bereavement or nancial worry. Other triggers that have been suggested are somatosensory triggers such as temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
Associations
Tinnitus is part of the symptom complex in Meniere’s disease, otosclerosis, and vestibular schwannoma. Tinnitus and disorders of sound tolerance are frequently comorbid. Tinnitus may be associated with psychological illness, particularly anxiety and depression.
Clinical Assessment
A tinn itus patient should have a deta iled neurotological history taken. e character of the t inni­tus should be assessed to ascertain whether it is pulsatile or non-pulsatile. Evaluating the impact of the symptom should include questions on mood, sleep, and concentration. Examination is oen normal, but it is important to exclude specic neu rotological pathologies. With rhythmica l tinnitus, auscultation of the head and neck should be performed. If pulsatile tinnitus diminishes with compression of the ipsilateral jugular vein, this points to a venous cause. With pulse-asyn­chronous pulsatile tinnitus, the pharynx should be checked for myoclonic contractions.
Investigations
Audiometry
Pure-tone audiometry should be conducted and, as many people with tinnitus report that their ears feel full or blocked, tympanometry is useful. Specialist long time-base tympa­nometry may be helpful in reaching a diagnosis of middle ear myoclonus. Trying to audio­metrically match the pitch and tone of tinnitus is dicult, adds little to the subsequent management, and is unnecessary in most cases.
Imaging
For non-pulsatile tinnitus, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning should be con­sidered if the tinnitus is unilateral, associated with a signicantly asymmetric audiogram (asymmetry on pure-tone audiometry of 15 dB or more at any two adjacent test frequencies, using test frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz; NICE 2020) or if there are abnormal neu­rological symptoms or signs. Investigating pulsatile tinnitus is more complex and depends in part on local expertise and availability. Investigative algorithms may include MRI, MR angiography, computed tomography (CT), CT angiography or conventional angiography, and lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal uid (CSF) pressure measurements.
Haematological Testing
Blood tests rarely add useful information in the tinnitus clinic and should be avoided unless there is good clinical indication. Haemoglobin, pregnancy, and/or thyroid function tests may be needed if the patient has pulsatile tinnitus secondary to a hyperdynamic circulation. ere is some weak evidence that tinnitus is more common in people with vitamin B deciencies, so this should be checked in people with restrictive diets or malabsorption syndromes.
Questionnaires
ere is no current objective measure or biomarker for tinnitus. Health care questionnaires are therefore used to estimate tinnitus severity. Tinnitus-specic questionnaires include the Tinnitus Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, and the Tinnitus Functional Index. Questionnaires may also be used to assess comorbid conditions including anxiety, depression, and insomnia.
e Ear 85
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HEARINGTINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
Treatment
If the clinical assessment has revealed that the tinnitus is associated with a specic condi­tion further management may be dictated by that condition. For example, a patient with otosclerosis may need to be counselled regarding the options of watchful waiting, uoride treatment, hearing aids, or stapes surgery. Surgery for otosclerosis is generally helpful for associated tinnitus, particularly when the hearing is improved. Surgery also has a role for those with tinnitus associated with severe/profound hearing loss: cochlear implantation generally improves the tinnitus though this is not universal and there is a small risk of the procedure triggering tinnitus or worsening pre-existing tinnitus.
Investigat ion of pulse-synch ronous tinnitus may reveal a treatable cause such as a vascular tumor, carotid artery stenosis, arteriovenous stula, raised intracranial pressure, or venous obstruction or abnormality. Further treatment will then be directed as necessary to rectify that problem.
Investigation of pulse-asynchronous pulsatile tinnitus oen draws a blank. If a particular pathology is proven or strongly suspected, specic treatments are available including divi­sion of the tensor tympani and stapedius tendons for intratympanic myoclonus or Botox injection of the relevant muscles for palatal myoclonus. ese treatments have signicant risks attached and in the case of intratympanic tendon division are irreversible. Surgery should therefore probably be best regarded as an option only aer careful consideration.
Most tinnitus is non-pulsatile and not associated with any specic condition. No drug therapy is currently recommended, but helpful management strategies are available. ese fall into two broad categories: audiologically based management and psychologically based management.
Audiological management is a combination of addressing any associated hearing loss with hearing aids, assistive listening devices or, if necessary, cochlear implants, using sound therapy, explanation, education and counselling, relaxation training and, if needed, advice regarding sleep. Various protocols have been developed using these principles in a structured way, including tinnitus retraining therapy, progressive tinnitus management and tinnitus activities treatment. ere is a modest evidence base supporting these approaches.
Hearing Improvement
e rationale for addressing any hearing loss from the outset is threefold. Firstly, most tinnitus clinicians feel that hearing loss causes people to strain to listen, which makes any tinnitus seem louder. Correcting the hearing loss reverses this process. Secondly, if the per­son can hear better they pick up more environmental sound, which tends to distract their brains from the tinnitus. Finally, improving the hearing allows people to interact with the education and counselling modules of the therapy more eectively.
Sound Therapy
ere are many options for delivering sound therapy: simply opening a bedroom window can allow sound from the outside world into an otherwise quiet domestic environment; sound can be generated by a stand-alone electronic device; there are tinnitus apps for mobile phones or computers; sound from electric fans, sh tank aerators, or indoor water features can be used; and the tinnitus-aected person can wear ear-level devices resembling small hearing aids that produce wideband sound. e consensus is that the sound used should be something that the person nds neither intrusive nor too interesting and should be delivered at a low level that mixes with the tinnitus perception rather than tries to mask it. When used at nighttime, sound therapy can be delivered directly into the bedroom environment or can be delivered more locally via pillow speakers, a small loudspeaker under the pillow, or via Bluetooth headbands. If hyperacusis is the main problem, desensitisation using sound therapy is oen helpful.
Combination Devices
All the major hearing aid manufacturers now oer devices that combine hearing aids and sound therapy devices in the same unit with the aim that the device is normally set to the
86 e Ear
15. TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
TINNITUS AND HYPERACUSIS
hearing aid setting, but if the person is in a quiet environment they can switch to the sound therapy program.
Psychological Treatments
e treatment with the be st evidence base for ec acy in manag ing tinnitu s is cognitive behav­iour therapy (CBT). Newer psychological treatment modalities including mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) also seem helpful. In the United Kingdom there is a dearth of audiologically literate psychologists to deliver such treatments, and alternative care pathways are being investigated including educating audiologists to provide CBT or using the Internet to deliver CBT.
Other Treatments
Although there is no drug approved specically for the management of tinnitus, drugs have a role in the management of comorbid conditions such as anxiety and depression. Physical therapies may have a role in the management of somatosensory tinnitus. Complementary and alternative medicine treatments do not have any specic anti-tinnitus eect but can improve relaxation and general well-being. Various experimental treatments are being explored, par­ticularly neuromodulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).
KEY POINTS
Tinnitus is the conscious perception of an auditory sensation in the absence of a
corresponding external stimulus. Hyperacusis is both a dislike of sounds above a certain intensity and a blanket term for several forms of impaired sound tolerance.
Modern models suggest that tinnitus is due to increased awareness of spontaneous
electrical activity in the auditory system. Although changes in the auditory periphery can trigger tinnitus, the processes that cause the symptom to perpetuate and become distressing occur in the central auditory pathways and in associated brain regions, particularly the limbic system.
Tinnitus is more common in people with a hearing loss, but the degree of hearing
impairment correlates poorly with tinnitus severity. About 1 in 10 people presenting with tinnitus have a normal audiogram. Tinnitus can exist after division of the auditory nerve.
Patients with tinnitus and/or hyperacusis should undergo a basic audiological assessment.
Further investigation should be undertaken in the those with pulsatile tinnitus, objectively audible tinnitus, unilateral tinnitus, tinnitus in association with asymmetric hearing loss, and tinnitus in association with neurological symptoms and/or signs.
Patients are often given negative counselling and being told that nothing can be
done for tinnitus. While a cure for tinnitus remains elusive, there are many helpful management strategies, particularly sound-based therapies, counselling, and psychological therapies.
Further Reading
McFerran D, Hoare DJ, Carr S, Ray J, Stockdale D. Tinnitus services in the United Kingdom:
a survey of patient experiences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):110. doi:10.1186/
s12913-018-2914-3
McFerran DJ, Stockdale D, Holme R, Large CH, Baguley DM. Why is there no cure for tin-
nitus? Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:802. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00802
Phillips JS, McFerran DJ, Hall DA, Hoare DJ. e natural history of subjective tinnitus in
adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of no-intervention periods in controlled trials. Laryngoscope. 2018; 128(1):217–227. doi:10.1002/lary.26607
e Ear 87