Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4382_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
83 Мб
Скачать
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
DecreaseintypeI
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
H.
contraversiveneurons inhibits/decreasesthe acCvaConofthe ipsiversivetypeII inhibitoryneurons throughthe commissuralfiber network
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
II
RVN
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
DecreasedacCvaConof
I.
theipsiversivetypeII neuronsreleasesthe inhibitorycontrolofthe typeIIinhibitory neuronsonthe ipsiversivetypeI neurons
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
FIGURE 3–4. continues
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
RVN
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
68
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
(VelocityStorage)
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
Thereleaseofinhibitory
J.
controlonthe ipsiversivetypeI excitatoryneurons furtheraugmentsthe excitatoryenvironment
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
I
II
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
RVN
II
I
+++ +++
I
II
I
+++
I
II
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
II
+++
I
I
II
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
ThisincreasedexcitaConof
K.
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
theipsiversiveexcitatory typeIneuronscreatesan augmentedneuraldrive wheretheprocessrepeats itselfbyfurthersuppressing theinhibitorycontrolon thecontraversivetypeII neurons
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
I
II
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
RVN
II
I
+++ +++
I
II
I
+++
I
II
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
II
+++
I
I
II
FIGURE 3–4. continues
69
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
HeadTurntotheRight
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
II
+++
II
RVN
I
+++ +++
I
II
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
I
I
II
I
I
II
Theneuralaugmented
L.
drivecycleisrepeated –thisprocessisknown asvelocitystorage mostacCveduringlow frequencyacceleraCons
Muchofthiscommissuralprocessis
governedthroughthecerebellum(nodulus/
ventraluvula)
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
(VelocityStorage)
M.
asis
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
RepeaCngcycleof commissuralinhibiCon createsaugmented inhibitory(leB)and excitatory(right) environments
FIGURE 3–4. continued
HeadTurntotheRight
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
II
+++
II
70
RVN
I
+++ +++
I
II
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
I
I
II
I
I
II
3. Anatomy and Physiology of the Central Vestibular System, Velocity Storage, and Central Compensation 71
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
illustrates the various stages that occur during velocity storage.
Positive Feedback Loop. This process of afferent
augmentation (and preservation of the neural re­sponse), however, is not limitless or self-sustaining. Rather, the positive feedback loop is heavily medi­ated by the nodulus of the vermis and the vestibu­locerebellum (Barin & Durrant, 2000; Curthoys & Halmagyi, 1996). Of course, we now know that the net effect of this positive feedback loop effec­tively augments a weak afferent signal beyond the primary peripheral input and is termed veloc­ity storage (Baloh & Honrubia, 2001; Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007; Markham, 1996). Augmenta­tion of weak peripheral afferent signals is vital to the accurate perception and integration of low-frequency head movement, or more specifi­cally, low frequency accelerations that are below
0.05 to 0.1
Hz (Highstein, 1996). Fundamentally, the process of velocity storage primarily exists to extend (or increase) the sensitivity (gain) of low frequency stimuli where the effectiveness of the VOR is less efficient in transducing slow accel­eration stimuli (Highstein, 1996). This loss of effi­ciency is primarily due to a decrease in the tuning of vestibular afferents below 0.1 Hz (as eluded to earlier in Highstein, 1996). Although there is some debate as to the degree of functional consequence that exists when the efficiency of the velocity stor­age no longer exists due to vestibular pathology, this concept is further discussed in Chapter 6.
The dependency on velocity storage mecha-
nisms for stimulus frequencies greater than 0.1
Hz is essentially zero. That is because the cupulae are accelerometers and respond (deflect) well to higher frequency stimuli. As the pendular model of semicircular canal function would dictate, deflection of the cupulae and underlying hair cells for more robust stimuli (>0.1 Hz) produces an afferent neural firing rate (drive) that is sufficient, by itself, to drive the VOR. Therefore, central aug­mentation is not needed for such mid-to-high fre­quency stimuli. It is only during low frequency accelerations that velocity storage mechanisms are required to augment an impuissant neural afferent drive that is, otherwise, not an issue with higher (more robust) frequency stimuli. This concept of
the vestibular afferent drive being a frequency dependent system is discussed and detailed again when reviewing VOR outcome measures (specifi­cally VOR phase) during sinusoidal acceleration testing in Chapter 6.
Aside from the velocity storage mechanism extending the sensitivity of low frequency stim­uli, this positive feedback loop can also manage tonic neural activity during conditions of sustained peripheral input. Most often, the vestibular sys­tem is subjected to brief head movements similar to those that occur during ambulation or conversa­tions. However, the peripheral vestibular system can, at times, be subjected to sustained peripheral input such as that during sustained body rotation (figure skater or playing “dizzy bats”) or even during amusement park rides. This sustained peripheral afferent input must be appropriately managed by the central system, which also falls under the control of the velocity storage mecha­nism. As clinicians and researchers, we can also make use of this type of sustained stimulus and response scenario, which we will present in Chap­ter 7 when discussing velocity step testing.
Velocity Storage Dependency. The synergis-
tic process of velocity storage is complex and highly dependent on the integrity of certain neu­ral processes and anatomical structures. As pre­viously noted, commissural vestibular fibers are undoubtedly essential for this process, because sectioning of commissural fibers abolishes veloc­ity storage (Leigh & Zee, 2006). Also paramount to this process is the effective down-regulation from the cerebellum, most notably from Pur­kinje cells within the cerebellar nodulus and uvula (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 1996; Highstein, 1996; Leigh & Zee, 2006). Finally, velocity stor­age is also dependent upon afferent signals from the vestibular periphery sensory end organs. Sectioning of the vestibular nerve or peripheral sensory end organ damage (either unilateral or bilateral) essentially abates velocity storage and significantly shortens the neural output from the VN, similar to that of cupular mechanics or process alone (to be reviewed in Chapter 7 when discussing velocity step testing) (Leigh & Zee, 2006). Collectively, these mechanisms or processes are
72 Rotational Vestibular Assessment
not only responsible for producing velocity stor­age but are also essential for ensuring effective compensation of the vestibular neural balance fol­lowing unilateral vestibular insult.
Vestibular Compensation
Vestibular compensation refers to the restoration of symmetry in the central neural tone between the vestibular nuclei following unilateral periph­eral vestibular insult (Barin & Durrant, 2000). On a gross level, central compensation involves a series of steps, or processes, that occur at different rates, and at different degrees and stages. Specifically, static compensation will occur at a much faster rate than that of dynamic compensation, where motion-induced activity on asymmetric laby­rinths exponentially complicates the central inte­gration required to achieve and maintain neural rebalancing (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). This is particularly true for low frequency information where velocity storage heavily contributes to the VOR response. Furthermore, the success of ves­tibular compensation is dependent on a number of physiologic factors. Such factors include com­missural efficiency between the vestibular nuclei, effectiveness of cerebellar control (i.e., clamping) of the vestibular nuclei, adaptation of disinhibited contralesional excitatory activity, orbital position, changes in neural activity due to gaze changes, re­weighting of spinal inputs, synaptogenesis (slow, long-term process), and denervation sensitivity (slow, long-term process) (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 1996; Zee, 2007). In short, because neurons located within the vestibular nuclei receive so many affer­ent fibers other than the peripheral vestibular lab­yrinths (cerebellum, spinal, cortical, brainstem), the processes that modulate and regulate the recovery of neural symmetry are often compli­cated and sometimes slow to succeed.
Static Compensation
To understand the process of static central vestibu­lar compensation, it is vital to understand the neu­rophysiologic basis of excitatory and inhibitory interactions of type I and type II neurons within
the vestibular nuclei (see discussion on velocity storage). Following acute vestibular insult, the average resting neural discharge rate of the VN on the intact side increases due to the lack of inhibition from the ipsilesional labyrinth (Barin & Durrant, 2000; Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). Concomitantly, the higher resting rate of intact VN only serves to further “silence” or inhibit the lesioned side. This, of course, is best illustrated by using the fundamental neurophysiological con­structs that we just discussed for velocity storage and the inhibitory commissural network.
Following a unilateral peripheral vestibular lesion, the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons are substantially reduced. Recalling the direct synaptic projections to the contralesional type II inhibitory neurons, the pathologic reduction of the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons causes a decrease in the activation of the contralesional type II inhibitory neurons (i.e., less inhibitory control). Given the intimate neighboring relation­ship between the contralesional type II inhibitory neurons and the contralesional type I excitatory neurons, the reduction in activation of the con­tralesional type II inhibitory neurons (decrease of inhibitory control over the type I excitatory neu­rons) causes a subsequent increase in the tonic excitation level of the contralesional type I excit­atory neurons, which occurs despite the lack of any head rotation or movement. This neurophysiologic process is what primarily drives the contralesional side to a higher tonic resting firing rate, some level above the normal 90 neural spikes per second. However, the deleterious and insidious neuro­physiologic process is not yet finished. Because the contralesional type I excitatory neurons have now assumed a higher level of tonic activation, they in turn project an increase in activation across the commissural network to the ipsilesional type II inhibitory neurons that are directly synapsed to their neighboring ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons, the very same type I excitatory neu­rons that have been negatively impacted due to the peripheral pathology. This signaling for an increase in activation of the ipsilesional type II inhibitory neurons only serves to increase their inhibitory control over the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons, which in turn subsequently
3. Anatomy and Physiology of the Central Vestibular System, Velocity Storage, and Central Compensation 73
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
drives their tonic neural activity even lower, if this is even possible (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). Of course, this cycle of further-and-further inhibi­tion of the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons and increase in tonic excitation of the contrale­sional type I excitatory neurons will continue in a vicious cycle, similar to the process of velocity storage; thus continuously driving a higher level of tonic neural firing rate in the contralesional VN concomitant to a decreasing level of tonic neural firing rate in the ipsilesional VN.
Neural Clamping. As our discussion on velocity
storage would previously suggest, this cyclical commissural process, albeit pathological, would propagate and persist unless otherwise inter­rupted and regulated. Such regulation has been identified (at least in rats) within the cerebellum, specifically from the nodulus of the caudal ver­mis and the flocculi during periods of early cen­tral vestibular asymmetry (Kitahara et al., 1998; Kitahara, Fukushima, Takeda, Saika, & Kubo,
2000). This intervention has been termed “neu­ral clamping,” which involves the down regula­tion of neural activity within the intact VN (Barin & Durrant, 2000; Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). Evidence shows that a reduction in the efficiency of the neurotransmitter receptor for gamma-ami­nobutyric acid (GABA) on the type I excitatory neurons on the intact side would allow for greater (recovery) activity of ipsilesional type I neurons. This is because ipsilesional type I excitatory neu­rons would not be affected by as much inhibition from their synaptic neighboring type II inhibitory neurons due to a decrease (or elimination) of inhi­bition signaling from the now “stabilized” con­tralesional type I excitatory neurons (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). In fact, this process of “neural clamping” can be clinically induced within hours of a non-pathologic vestibular asymmetry, such as that from sustained unilateral vestibular stimula­tion (Barin & Durrant, 2000). Within a week of a
unilateral vestibular lesion, neural activity from the type I excitatory neurons can be measured within the vestibular nuclei from the lesioned side. Supplemental evidence has also shown this “neu­ral regeneration” to originate not from the afferent periphery, but rather from other sources within the CNS (Barin & Durrant, 2000).
During the later stages of asymmetric central repair, a progressive increase and rebalancing in neural activity is observed as the “neural clamp­ing” from the cerebellum is adapted and modi­fied. Kitahara and associates (1998; 2000) have proposed that neurons in the flocculus may regu­late the “hyperactive” type I excitatory neurons in the intact vestibular nucleus. In turn, and more importantly, this action would serve to regulate the inhibition of the type I excitatory neurons in the ipsilesional side, (via a reduction in the inhibi­tion of the ipsilesional type II inhibitory neurons), thus allowing for a restoration of type I neural activity in the absence of any afferent peripheral input from the damaged labyrinth. This process likely continues and is continually modified by the cerebellum until the neural activity of the “clamped” contralesional side returns to pre­lesioned levels, and a symmetrical central neural tone is restored between the two vestibular nuclei. Figure 3–5 (A–V) complements the previous dis­cussion on static compensation, and illustrates the various stages that occur during the compensa­tion process.
This process of central compensation is most stable and effective when the lesion is stable and the environment (individual) is static. In fact, the process of static compensation is extremely robust, and very little appears to hasten or hin­der it (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). Conversely, the restoration of dynamic equilibrium, or the pro­cess of dynamic compensation, is much more com­plex and involves the integration of all systems involved with movement, such as the vestibuloco­llic reflex and the autonomic reflex system.






  













































         

 

FIGURE 3–5. A–V. Progressive stages associated with process of central vestibular compensa-
tion following a unilateral vestibular lesion. Large boxes represent the right and left vestibular nuclei. Smaller vertical rectangles (two flanking each bottom side) represent the hypothetical level of neural tonic activity within the peripheral (P) and the central (C) vestibular systems. continues
74

Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/










    


  

 





















































       
Higher

 













































FIGURE 3–5. continues
75


 












Higher

 











































        


 










Higher

 












































         




 



FIGURE 3–5. continues
76





Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/










       
Higher

 



















































Higher

 













































 

         




 



FIGURE 3–5. continues
77



