Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4382_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
DecreaseintypeI
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
H.
contraversiveneurons
inhibits/decreasesthe
acCvaConofthe
ipsiversivetypeII
inhibitoryneurons
throughthe
commissuralfiber
network
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
II
RVN
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
DecreasedacCvaConof
I.
theipsiversivetypeII
neuronsreleasesthe
inhibitorycontrolofthe
typeIIinhibitory
neuronsonthe
ipsiversivetypeI
neurons
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
FIGURE 3–4. continues
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
RVN
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
68

VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
(VelocityStorage)
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
Thereleaseofinhibitory
J.
controlonthe
ipsiversivetypeI
excitatoryneurons
furtheraugmentsthe
excitatoryenvironment
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
I
II
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
RVN
II
I
+++ +++
I
II
I
+++
I
II
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
II
+++
I
I
II
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
ThisincreasedexcitaConof
K.
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
HeadTurntotheRight
theipsiversiveexcitatory
typeIneuronscreatesan
augmented“neuraldrive”
wheretheprocessrepeats
itselfbyfurthersuppressing
theinhibitorycontrolon
thecontraversivetypeII
neurons
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
I
II
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
RVN
II
I
+++ +++
I
II
I
+++
I
II
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
II
+++
I
I
II
FIGURE 3–4. continues
69
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity

VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
(VelocityStorage)
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
DecreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
HeadTurntotheRight
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
II
+++
II
RVN
I
+++ +++
I
II
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
I
I
II
I
I
II
The“neuralaugmented
L.
drive”cycleisrepeated
–thisprocessisknown
asvelocitystorage
mostacCveduringlow
frequencyacceleraCons
Muchofthiscommissuralprocessis
governedthroughthecerebellum(nodulus/
ventraluvula)
VNNeurophysiologyDuringHeadTurn
I
TypeIexcitaCon
II
TypeIIinhibiCon
I
TypeIInhibitory
(VelocityStorage)
M.
asis
IncreasedAfferent
NeuralAcCvity
RepeaCngcycleof
commissuralinhibiCon
createsaugmented
inhibitory(leB)and
excitatory(right)
environments
FIGURE 3–4. continued
HeadTurntotheRight
II
I
I
LVN
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
II
II
+++
II
70
RVN
I
+++ +++
I
II
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
II
I
I
+++
I
+++
I
I
II
I
I
II

3. Anatomy and Physiology of the Central Vestibular System, Velocity Storage, and Central Compensation 71
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
illustrates the various stages that occur during
velocity storage.
Positive Feedback Loop. This process of afferent
augmentation (and preservation of the neural response), however, is not limitless or self-sustaining.
Rather, the positive feedback loop is heavily mediated by the nodulus of the vermis and the vestibulocerebellum (Barin & Durrant, 2000; Curthoys &
Halmagyi, 1996). Of course, we now know that
the net effect of this positive feedback loop effectively augments a weak afferent signal beyond
the primary peripheral input and is termed velocity storage (Baloh & Honrubia, 2001; Curthoys
& Halmagyi, 2007; Markham, 1996). Augmentation of weak peripheral afferent signals is vital
to the accurate perception and integration of
low-frequency head movement, or more specifically, low frequency accelerations that are below
0.05 to 0.1
Hz (Highstein, 1996). Fundamentally,
the process of velocity storage primarily exists to
extend (or increase) the sensitivity (gain) of low
frequency stimuli where the effectiveness of the
VOR is less efficient in transducing slow acceleration stimuli (Highstein, 1996). This loss of efficiency is primarily due to a decrease in the tuning
of vestibular afferents below 0.1 Hz (as eluded to
earlier in Highstein, 1996). Although there is some
debate as to the degree of functional consequence
that exists when the efficiency of the velocity storage no longer exists due to vestibular pathology,
this concept is further discussed in Chapter 6.
The dependency on velocity storage mecha-
nisms for stimulus frequencies greater than 0.1
Hz
is essentially zero. That is because the cupulae
are accelerometers and respond (deflect) well to
higher frequency stimuli. As the pendular model
of semicircular canal function would dictate,
deflection of the cupulae and underlying hair cells
for more robust stimuli (>0.1 Hz) produces an
afferent neural firing rate (drive) that is sufficient,
by itself, to drive the VOR. Therefore, central augmentation is not needed for such mid-to-high frequency stimuli. It is only during low frequency
accelerations that velocity storage mechanisms are
required to augment an impuissant neural afferent
drive that is, otherwise, not an issue with higher
(more robust) frequency stimuli. This concept of
the vestibular afferent drive being a frequency
dependent system is discussed and detailed again
when reviewing VOR outcome measures (specifically VOR phase) during sinusoidal acceleration
testing in Chapter 6.
Aside from the velocity storage mechanism
extending the sensitivity of low frequency stimuli, this positive feedback loop can also manage
tonic neural activity during conditions of sustained
peripheral input. Most often, the vestibular system is subjected to brief head movements similar
to those that occur during ambulation or conversations. However, the peripheral vestibular system
can, at times, be subjected to sustained peripheral
input such as that during sustained body rotation
(figure skater or playing “dizzy bats”) or even
during amusement park rides. This sustained
peripheral afferent input must be appropriately
managed by the central system, which also falls
under the control of the velocity storage mechanism. As clinicians and researchers, we can also
make use of this type of sustained stimulus and
response scenario, which we will present in Chapter 7 when discussing velocity step testing.
Velocity Storage Dependency. The synergis-
tic process of velocity storage is complex and
highly dependent on the integrity of certain neural processes and anatomical structures. As previously noted, commissural vestibular fibers are
undoubtedly essential for this process, because
sectioning of commissural fibers abolishes velocity storage (Leigh & Zee, 2006). Also paramount
to this process is the effective down-regulation
from the cerebellum, most notably from Purkinje cells within the cerebellar nodulus and
uvula (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 1996; Highstein,
1996; Leigh & Zee, 2006). Finally, velocity storage is also dependent upon afferent signals from
the vestibular periphery sensory end organs.
Sectioning of the vestibular nerve or peripheral
sensory end organ damage (either unilateral or
bilateral) essentially abates velocity storage and
significantly shortens the neural output from
the VN, similar to that of cupular mechanics or
process alone (to be reviewed in Chapter 7 when
discussing velocity step testing) (Leigh & Zee, 2006).
Collectively, these mechanisms or processes are

72 Rotational Vestibular Assessment
not only responsible for producing velocity storage but are also essential for ensuring effective
compensation of the vestibular neural balance following unilateral vestibular insult.
Vestibular Compensation
Vestibular compensation refers to the restoration
of symmetry in the central neural tone between
the vestibular nuclei following unilateral peripheral vestibular insult (Barin & Durrant, 2000). On a
gross level, central compensation involves a series
of steps, or processes, that occur at different rates,
and at different degrees and stages. Specifically,
static compensation will occur at a much faster
rate than that of dynamic compensation, where
motion-induced activity on asymmetric labyrinths exponentially complicates the central integration required to achieve and maintain neural
rebalancing (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). This is
particularly true for low frequency information
where velocity storage heavily contributes to the
VOR response. Furthermore, the success of vestibular compensation is dependent on a number
of physiologic factors. Such factors include commissural efficiency between the vestibular nuclei,
effectiveness of cerebellar control (i.e., clamping)
of the vestibular nuclei, adaptation of disinhibited
contralesional excitatory activity, orbital position,
changes in neural activity due to gaze changes, reweighting of spinal inputs, synaptogenesis (slow,
long-term process), and denervation sensitivity
(slow, long-term process) (Curthoys & Halmagyi,
1996; Zee, 2007). In short, because neurons located
within the vestibular nuclei receive so many afferent fibers other than the peripheral vestibular labyrinths (cerebellum, spinal, cortical, brainstem),
the processes that modulate and regulate the
recovery of neural symmetry are often complicated and sometimes slow to succeed.
Static Compensation
To understand the process of static central vestibular compensation, it is vital to understand the neurophysiologic basis of excitatory and inhibitory
interactions of type I and type II neurons within
the vestibular nuclei (see discussion on velocity
storage). Following acute vestibular insult, the
average resting neural discharge rate of the VN
on the intact side increases due to the lack of
inhibition from the ipsilesional labyrinth (Barin
& Durrant, 2000; Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007).
Concomitantly, the higher resting rate of intact
VN only serves to further “silence” or inhibit the
lesioned side. This, of course, is best illustrated by
using the fundamental neurophysiological constructs that we just discussed for velocity storage
and the inhibitory commissural network.
Following a unilateral peripheral vestibular
lesion, the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons
are substantially reduced. Recalling the direct
synaptic projections to the contralesional type II
inhibitory neurons, the pathologic reduction of
the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons causes
a decrease in the activation of the contralesional
type II inhibitory neurons (i.e., less inhibitory
control). Given the intimate neighboring relationship between the contralesional type II inhibitory
neurons and the contralesional type I excitatory
neurons, the reduction in activation of the contralesional type II inhibitory neurons (decrease of
inhibitory control over the type I excitatory neurons) causes a subsequent increase in the tonic
excitation level of the contralesional type I excitatory neurons, which occurs despite the lack of any
head rotation or movement. This neurophysiologic
process is what primarily drives the contralesional
side to a higher tonic resting firing rate, some level
above the normal 90 neural spikes per second.
However, the deleterious and insidious neurophysiologic process is not yet finished. Because
the contralesional type I excitatory neurons have
now assumed a higher level of tonic activation,
they in turn project an increase in activation across
the commissural network to the ipsilesional type
II inhibitory neurons that are directly synapsed
to their neighboring ipsilesional type I excitatory
neurons, the very same type I excitatory neurons that have been negatively impacted due to
the peripheral pathology. This signaling for an
increase in activation of the ipsilesional type II
inhibitory neurons only serves to increase their
inhibitory control over the ipsilesional type I
excitatory neurons, which in turn subsequently

3. Anatomy and Physiology of the Central Vestibular System, Velocity Storage, and Central Compensation 73
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
drives their tonic neural activity even lower, if this
is even possible (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). Of
course, this cycle of further-and-further inhibition of the ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons
and increase in tonic excitation of the contralesional type I excitatory neurons will continue in
a vicious cycle, similar to the process of velocity
storage; thus continuously driving a higher level
of tonic neural firing rate in the contralesional VN
concomitant to a decreasing level of tonic neural
firing rate in the ipsilesional VN.
Neural Clamping. As our discussion on velocity
storage would previously suggest, this cyclical
commissural process, albeit pathological, would
propagate and persist unless otherwise interrupted and regulated. Such regulation has been
identified (at least in rats) within the cerebellum,
specifically from the nodulus of the caudal vermis and the flocculi during periods of early central vestibular asymmetry (Kitahara et al., 1998;
Kitahara, Fukushima, Takeda, Saika, & Kubo,
2000). This intervention has been termed “neural clamping,” which involves the down regulation of neural activity within the intact VN (Barin
& Durrant, 2000; Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007).
Evidence shows that a reduction in the efficiency
of the neurotransmitter receptor for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on the type I excitatory
neurons on the intact side would allow for greater
(recovery) activity of ipsilesional type I neurons.
This is because ipsilesional type I excitatory neurons would not be affected by as much inhibition
from their synaptic neighboring type II inhibitory
neurons due to a decrease (or elimination) of inhibition signaling from the now “stabilized” contralesional type I excitatory neurons (Curthoys &
Halmagyi, 2007). In fact, this process of “neural
clamping” can be clinically induced within hours
of a non-pathologic vestibular asymmetry, such as
that from sustained unilateral vestibular stimulation (Barin & Durrant, 2000). Within a week of a
unilateral vestibular lesion, neural activity from
the type I excitatory neurons can be measured
within the vestibular nuclei from the lesioned side.
Supplemental evidence has also shown this “neural regeneration” to originate not from the afferent
periphery, but rather from other sources within
the CNS (Barin & Durrant, 2000).
During the later stages of asymmetric central
repair, a progressive increase and rebalancing in
neural activity is observed as the “neural clamping” from the cerebellum is adapted and modified. Kitahara and associates (1998; 2000) have
proposed that neurons in the flocculus may regulate the “hyperactive” type I excitatory neurons
in the intact vestibular nucleus. In turn, and more
importantly, this action would serve to regulate
the inhibition of the type I excitatory neurons in
the ipsilesional side, (via a reduction in the inhibition of the ipsilesional type II inhibitory neurons),
thus allowing for a restoration of type I neural
activity in the absence of any afferent peripheral
input from the damaged labyrinth. This process
likely continues and is continually modified by
the cerebellum until the neural activity of the
“clamped” contralesional side returns to prelesioned levels, and a symmetrical central neural
tone is restored between the two vestibular nuclei.
Figure 3–5 (A–V) complements the previous discussion on static compensation, and illustrates
the various stages that occur during the compensation process.
This process of central compensation is most
stable and effective when the lesion is stable and
the environment (individual) is static. In fact,
the process of static compensation is extremely
robust, and very little appears to hasten or hinder it (Curthoys & Halmagyi, 2007). Conversely,
the restoration of dynamic equilibrium, or the process of dynamic compensation, is much more complex and involves the integration of all systems
involved with movement, such as the vestibulocollic reflex and the autonomic reflex system.

FIGURE 3–5. A–V. Progressive stages associated with process of central vestibular compensa-
tion following a unilateral vestibular lesion. Large boxes represent the right and left vestibular nuclei.
Smaller vertical rectangles (two flanking each bottom side) represent the hypothetical level of neural
tonic activity within the peripheral (P) and the central (C) vestibular systems. continues
74

Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
“”
Higher
FIGURE 3–5. continues
75

Higher
“”
“
”
Higher
“
”
FIGURE 3–5. continues
76

Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Higher
Higher
FIGURE 3–5. continues
77
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
