Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_138_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
87 Мб
Скачать
the distal radius, hamate, trapezium, pisiform, or ring and small
https://t.me/med1917
metacarpals; hypothenar hammer syndrome; and repetitive and
188
prolonged pressure (ie, cyclist’s palsy).
ere may be an asso­ciation between UTS and CTS. In a retrospective study, authors reported a high percentage (85%) of individuals with idiopathic UTS also had CTS.
204
Chen and Tsai
188
reported 20% to 30% of patients with CTS have concurrent UTS, and in a recent systematic review, authors found abnormalities in the shape and pressure of the ulnar tunnel in individuals with CTS and im­provement in ulnar nerve electrodiagnostic data in individuals
205
who underwent CTR.
Individuals with UTS complain of pain, numbness, tin­gling, and weakness in the ulnar nerve distribution of the hand that aects grip and pinch strength. Patients with more severe, or prolonged compression may demonstrate clawing of the ring and small ngers, intrinsic muscle wasting, as well as atrophy of the thumb web space. Patients with motor loss may display a positive Froment sign. Electrodiagnostic studies may conrm the clinical diagnosis.
e clinical presentation of UTS varies depending on the location of the compression. Compression proximal to the ulnar tunnel, before the bifurcation into supercial and deep branches, results in sensory loss in the volar-ulnar distribution of the hand (hypothenar eminence and small and ulnar half of the ring ngers), and weakness of all ulnar-innervated in-
188,206
trinsic muscles.
Compression of the supercial branch of the ulnar nerve produces sensory loss on the volar aspect of the ulnar-innervated ngers, but there is no signicant motor weak­ness, because the supercial branch only innervates the palmar­is brevis muscle and weakness is dicult to detect clinically.
188
Compression of the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve in
206
the hand produces isolated motor symptoms.
In the event of
arterial involvement, the patient may have a positive Allen test.
Dierentiating between proximal and distal ulnar nerve lesions includes sensory testing the ulnar-dorsal aspect of the hand. e dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve, which traverses volar to dorsal 4 cm to 5 cm proximal to the ulnar tun­nel, innervates this area. us, an ulnar-dorsal sensory loss indi­cates a more proximal lesion; whereas, retained sensation in this
206
area indicates a lesion distal to the dorsal cutaneous branch.
Nonsurgical management is indicated for patients with mild UTS without motor decit and when there is no identi­able structural abnormality, but early recognition is important. Patient education should include rest, activity modication, and use of equipment such as orthoses or gloves to minimize compression. Cyclists should alter hand and upper extremity positioning on longer rides and assure proper body mechan­ics through appropriate saddle and handle-bar positioning.
207
erapists should refer patients presenting with motor loss to a hand surgeon for further diagnostic imaging and testing and possible exploration. Surgery is indicated in patients who pres­ent with compressive lesions, motor decits, and failed non-
188
surgical management.
Surgery consists of resection of mass-
es, thromboses, aberrant brous bands, or bony protrusions causing compression.
206
Patients undergoing surgery for UTS regain ROM on their own and are unlikely to have postopera­tive therapy. Some individuals may develop complications such as hypertrophic or hypersensitive scars, and these may warrant a therapy examination. As with all nerve lesions, the therapist educates the patient to avoid contact with items that may cause damage to the insensate areas. is is especially important in the ulnar aspect of the hand because of its potential for resting on hot, sharp, or rough surfaces.
179
Radial nerve
Radial nerve injury, or compression, at the wrist, some-
times referred to as Wartenberg syndrome (or cheiralgia paresthe- sia), causes sensory changes in the radial aspect of the wrist, dorsal thumb, thumb web span, and radiodorsal aspect of the hand. e nerve is very supercial in this area and can easily be compressed by external forces. Causes of injury or compression include trauma, diabetes, repeated exposure to cold, hand exer­tion, a tightly worn wristwatch or handcus, lipoma, surgeries, or compression between the brachioradialis and ECRL mus-
208
cles.
Anomalous brous or fascial bands arising from these
muscles can also cause compression.
209
Compression can also result from a cast that is applied too tight, or from a surgical intervention around the base of the thumb, such as an inter­position arthroplasty for rst CMC joint osteoarthritis or De Quervain decompression.
Patients may complain of pain, numbness, tingling, or hy­persensitivity in the distribution of the nerve along the dorsal aspects of the thumb and radial hand. ere may be a positive Tinel sign over the radial side of the wrist, at the radial styloid, or distal radius. Manual muscle testing of the brachioradialis or radial wrist extension may elicit symptoms. Dierential di­agnosis includes cervical radiculopathy (particularly C6 nerve root entrapment), De Quervain tendinopathy, rst CMC joint osteoarthritis, intersection syndrome, and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve neuritis.
210
Patient education for care of the insensate area and pre­vention of further injury is important. Management includes eliminating compression and avoiding wrist positions that recreate symptoms. Gentle nerve gliding may be benecial; however, any treatment should not recreate an inammatory re­sponse or reproduce symptoms. Surgical intervention includes release of fascial bands or restrictions between the brachioradi­alis and ECRL, or removal of space-occupying lesions (eg, lipo­mas or bone spurs).
209
erapy post-surgery is rarely indicated in these patients unless there is a need for wrist or thumb ROM exercises, scar or nerve mobilization, or desensitization.
Double-crush and reversed double-crush syndromes
Double-crush syndrome is an important concept for phy­sicians and therapists to understand when diagnosing nerve le­sions in the upper extremity. Double-crush syndrome implies that proximal interference with axonal transport will make the
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
55
distal aspect of the nerve more susceptible to injury, such as in
https://t.me/med1917
the case of a patient with a cervical lesion who develops CTS.
211
With reversed double-crush syndromes, retrograde transport from the axon to the nerve cell body is disrupted making the
211
proximal aspect of the nerve more susceptible to injury.
is awareness allows more accurate diagnosis of patients with cer­vical radiculopathy who present with mixed nerve symptoms and patients with nerve compression syndromes who do not demonstrate classic patterns of nerve injury.
Nerve Regeneration
Following nerve compression, laceration, or surgical repair, the therapist should assess nerve regeneration. A positive Tinel sign distal to the lesion is the rst sign of nerve regeneration.
74
Begin by tapping distally to proximally along the course of the injured nerve. e level of axonal regeneration corresponds to the point where tapping produces tingling in the nerve’s dis­tribution. e therapist can use the Tinel sign repeatedly over
212
time to track the level of axonal regeneration.
More research needs to be done to validate use of the Tinel sign in this manner. Monitor motor return through muscle testing or observing in­dividual muscle, strength, hand function, substitution patterns, and postural changes.
Sensory recovery can be monitored by testing the patient’s ability to sense pain (through use of a pin prick). As recovery progresses, track the individual’s response to moving 2PD and then static 2PD. Monolaments can be used to assess sensory threshold. If using monolaments, when the patient senses the
4.31 monolament (diminished protective sensation), there is
74
also a gross appreciation for static 2PD (7-10 mm).
CONCLUSION
Evaluation of the hand and wrist requires a therapist to be mindful of the intricate anatomy and appreciate the careful pal­pation required about the small and closely approximated struc­tures. Early referral allows a therapist to assess for well-tting casts or orthoses and initiate active eorts to minimize edema formation. Tendon glide exercises as early as allowed by tissue healing constraints may minimize adhesion formation thereby improving motion of multiple small joints within the hand. A sensory examination can assist in identifying a patient who could benet from either desensitization activities or sensory reeducation. Finally, one must appreciate injuries and pathol­ogies that may be treated with nonsurgical care (eg, soft tissue mallet, volar plate avulsion, mild nerve compression symptoms) versus those best referred for surgical or medical intervention (eg, stener lesion, wrist instabilities, advanced compression neu­ropathies).
CASE SCENARIOS
Case Scenario 1
A 22-year-old male college student presents to the clinic via direct access 2 days after he felt a ‘pop’ in his right ring
nger while attempting to grab another player’s jersey during a football game. He presents with pain, ecchymosis on the volar aspect of the ring nger distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, and an inability to actively ex the ring nger DIP joint. His passive range of motion (ROM) at the DIP joint is normal but pain­ful. He has 90° of active ROM at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. His active extension is normal.
1.
After taking a history and observing his active and passive ROM, you suspect:
a. Collateral ligament sprain.
Ruptured extensor tendon.
b. c. Ruptured exor digitorum profundus tendon. d. Ruptured exor digitorum supercialis tendon.
e correct answer is c. Ruptured exor digitorum pro- fundus tendon. Lack of active ROM at the DIP joint could be the result of a exor tendon rupture. e mechanism of injury
is most often a forceful extension of a exed DIP joint, such as grabbing another player’s jersey, and it occurs most often in the ring nger. e injury spares the exor digitorum supercialis
tendon leaving PIP joint active ROM intact. In collateral liga­ment sprains, PIP and DIP joint active ROM are intact. In this patient, PIP and DIP joint extension are normal, ruling out a ruptured extensor tendon.
includes:
a. Fabricate a wrist cock-up orthosis to position the wrist
in a neutral position.
Instruct the patient in passive exion exercises to be
b.
done 10 times every 1 to 2 hours. c. Refer him to a hand surgeon for a surgical consultation. d. Use an orthosis to position the DIP joint in extension
and have him return in 8 weeks.
e correct answer is c. Refer him to a hand surgeon for
a surgical consultation. ese injuries require surgical xation immediately to avoid tendon retraction into the forearm. e patient will also require a radiograph to rule out an avulsion fracture.
3. Following a 4-strand tendon repair, which of the follow­ing should be addressed early in the postoperative period to minimize friction and load to the healing tendon?
a. Edema control and full passive ROM of all digits. b. Edema control and full passive ROM of the wrist. c. Restore full active ROM of the uninvolved digits. d. Restore full active ROM of the wrist.
e correct answer is a. Edema control and full passive ROM of all digits. Following a 4-strand tendon repair, the therapist instructs the patient in strategies to reduce edema and
56
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
minimize nger stiness to reduce load on the healing tendon.
https://t.me/med1917
is also maintains joint ROM while allowing the tendon re­pair to heal. Because the exor digitorum profundus tendons are connected via the same muscle belly, active ROM at the in­dex, long, or small ngers places excessive tension on the repair site that may lead to gapping or rupture.
Based on the patient history, what structure/area(s) would
2. you focus your palpation upon?
a. Anatomical snu box. b. Hook of the hamate. c. Scaphoid tubercle. d.
Ulnocarpal joints.
4.
Which of the following exercises would be appropriate on the rst postoperative visit following a repair of the exor digitorum profundus in zone 1?
a. Active PIP joint extension with the metacarpophalange-
al joints positioned at 0°. b. Grip strengthening with putty. c. Passive DIP and PIP joint exion with the ngers posi-
tioned in the intrinsic plus position. d. Passive stretching to increase PIP joint extension with
the metacarpophalangeal joints positioned at 0°.
e correct answer is c. Passive DIP and PIP joint ex-
ion with the ngers positioned in the intrinsic plus position. e intrinsic plus position allows the repaired tendon to be on slack. Passive joint motion allows the patient to work on joint exibility and does not jeopardize the healing tendon. e other choices would place too much tension across the repair site and risk rupture.
Case Scenario 2
A 32-year-old female presents to the clinic with an acute
onset of ulnar-sided wrist pain that began after a fall on an out­stretched hand 3 days prior. She complains of pain at rest and with all directions of wrist active range of motion (ROM). She also complains of clicking in the extremity with active wrist ROM. Her grip is painful, and her grip strength is decreased compared to the opposite side. She denies numbness or tin­gling. Initial radiographs taken by her primary care physician were read as normal. Treatment up to this point has included ice and rest. e patient was referred to physical therapy for evaluation and treatment with a diagnosis of “wrist sprain.”
Which of the following structures was most likely injured
1. based on the history and complaints?
a. Hook of the hamate. b. Scapholunate ligament. c. Triangular brocartilage complex (TFCC).
Ulnar nerve.
d.
e correct answer is c. Triangular brocartilage com- plex (TFCC). e location of the pain and mechanism of in­jury are consistent with an injury of the TFCC. Scapholunate injuries tend to produce pain in the radial side of the wrist. Choice d. is a nerve injury that produces paresthesia, and this is not a complaint. Choice a. would have been ruled out with radiographs assuming the correct view was taken.
e correct answer is d. Ulnocarpal joints. Patients com­plaining of pain in the ulnar side of the wrist should have a thorough examination of all structures in this area. Palpation of the anatomical snubox, hook of hamate, and scaphoid tubercle would be done but would not be the focus of the examination.
Which of the following pathologies produces radial-sided
3.
wrist pain?
Distal radioulnar joint instability.
a.
b. Extensor carpi ulnaris tendinopathy.
c.
Triangular brocartilage tear.
Scapholunate ligament tear.
d.
e correct answer is d. Scapholunate ligament tear. Of the choices given, this is the only condition that produces pain on the radial side of the wrist. All others produce ulnar-sided wrist pain.
4.
Which of the following special tests would be useful in dif­ferentiating between a lesion of the triangular brocartilage complex (TFCC) and instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ)?
a. Piano key sign or test.
b. Pisiform boost test.
c. Ulnar compression test.
d. Ulnar fovea sign.
e correct answer is a. e piano key sign or test. Both special tests aid in identifying instability in the DRUJ. e pi­siform boost test is performed to examine the integrity of the ulnocarpal ligaments and the ulnar compression test to examine the DRUJ for inammation or arthritis. e ulnar fovea sign is a good screening tool for ulnar-sided wrist pathology but does not dierentiate between a TFCC lesion and DRUJ instability.
Case Scenario 3
A 57-year-old male presents to an outpatient clinic com­plaining of an insidious onset of right-hand pain that started 2 months ago. e patient reports a past medical history that includes type II diabetes and hypothyroidism. e pain is lo­calized to the palm at the distal palmar crease, proximal to the ring nger. He also complains of ring and small nger stiness and diculty opening his hand in the morning. He reports the stiness resolves in 20 to 30 minutes. He denies numbness or tingling. Upon examination, the physical therapist notices a nodule in the palm at the level of the pain complaints and nor­mal active range of motion (ROM).
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
57
1. Which of the following conditions should be ruled out?
https://t.me/med1917
a. Collateral ligament sprain. b.
Flexor tendon rupture. c. Extensor tendon rupture. d. Trigger nger.
e correct answer is d. Trigger nger. e patient has
normal active ROM, so tendon rupture would be incorrect. A patient with a collateral ligament sprain would present with pain on the radial or ulnar border of the metacarpophalangeal or interphalangeal joint and likely report a mechanism of injury.
2. Which of the following questions would help the physical therapist in determining an accurate diagnosis?
Does the ring nger get “stuck” in a exed position?
a. b. Does pinching recreate symptoms? c. Is there any numbness or tingling? d. Do you recall a specic mechanism of injury?
usually at the distal palmar crease. However, with Dupuytren disease, the nodules are in the palmar fascia and do not move proximally with active movement. It is not a nerve compression because the patient denies numbness and tingling. e location of the pain is not consistent with dorsal intercalated segmental instability.
5. During the examination, the physical therapist notes the nodule moves proximally with active ring nger exion. In the early phases of trigger nger, which of the following in­terventions would be most appropriate?
a. An orthosis that blocks proximal and distal interphalan-
geal joint exion.
b. An orthosis that blocks metacarpophalangeal joint ex-
ion. c. Grip strengthening with putty. d. Passive stretching to improve metacarpophalangeal and
proximal interphalangeal joint exion.
e correct answer is a. Does the nger get “stuck” in a exed position? A nodule formed with a trigger nger slides proximally during exion and gets stuck on the A1 pulley. is is the classic sign for trigger nger. Pinch and sensation are nor­mal. While asking about a mechanism of injury may be an im­portant part of the history, it is less useful for determining an accurate diagnosis in this scenario.
3.
Which of the following would help the physical therapist conrm the diagnosis?
a.
Determine if the nodule moves with active nger move­ment.
Measure active ROM of the ring nger.
b.
c. Perform a collateral ligament stress test.
d.
Use Semmes-Weinstein monolaments to assess sen­sation.
e correct answer is a. Determine if the nodule moves with active nger movement. A nodule formed with a trigger nger slides proximally during exion and gets stuck on the A1 pulley. is is the classic sign for trigger nger. Active ROM and sensory assessment may be useful but would not help in conrming the presence of a trigger nger. A collateral ligament stress test is not indicated due to the nature of the patient’s symptoms.
Which of the following conditions would the therapist have
4.
to also rule out given the patient’s signs and symptoms?
a. Carpal tunnel syndrome.
b. Dorsal intercalated segmental instability.
c. Dupuytren disease.
d. Radial sensory nerve compression.
e correct answer is c. Dupuytren disease. Individu­als with Dupuytren disease also present with palmar nodules,
e correct answer is b. An orthosis that blocks metacar- pophalangeal joint exion. It is the active movement of the metacarpophalangeal joint that causes the nodule to stick on the proximal edge of the A1 pulley, so that is the joint incor­porated into the orthosis. ere are rare cases where blocking the distal interphalangeal joint would need to be added. Grip strengthening is not indicated because it may increase the te­nosynovitis and worsen the symptoms. Because the patient has normal active ROM, passive stretching would not be indicated.
Case Scenario 4
A 45-year-old female presents to the physical therapy clinic via direct access with right wrist pain that began 2 weeks prior following a fall from her bicycle. Immediately following the ac­cident, she was treated in the emergency department for a lacer­ation to her scalp. While in the emergency department, she had a radiograph of her wrist that was read as negative. She reports her wrist pain at rest is 3/10 and with motion or weight-bear­ing activities, it increases to 6/10. Palpation reveals the patient’s pain is localized to the anatomical snubox. Her wrist active range of motion (ROM) is limited in all directions.
Which of the following would least likely be the source of
1.
the pain?
a. Extensor pollicis longus muscle/tendon.
b. Hook of hamate.
c. Scapholunate ligament.
d. Waist of the scaphoid.
e correct answer is b. Hook of hamate. Tenderness in the anatomical snubox can indicate an injury to the scaphoid or the scapholunate ligament. e extensor pollicis longus ten­don is one of the borders of the anatomical snubox. e hook of the hamate however is on the volar, ulnar side of the hand.
58
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
2. Of the following special tests, which would be most appro-
https://t.me/med1917
priate for the physical therapist to perform rst?
a. Scaphoid shift test. b. Lunotriquetral ballottement test. c. Eicho test. d. Midcarpal instability test.
e correct answer is a. Scaphoid shift test. e scaphoid shift test is used to assess the integrity of the scapholunate liga­ment, which can be injured in a fall onto an outstretched hand. e Eicho test is used to look for De Quervain tendinopathy. While the lunotriquetral ballottement and midcarpal instability tests may be appropriate, the more important test at this point is the scaphoid shift test based on reported symptoms.
3.
Which of the following orthoses would be appropriate for an individual with a suspected scaphoid fracture?
a. Resting hand orthosis.
b. umb spica orthosis.
Ulnar gutter orthosis.
c.
d. Wrist cock-up orthosis.
e correct answer is b. umb spica orthosis. e ulnar gutter and wrist cock-up orthoses are not appropriate because the thumb would not be immobilized. e resting hand or­thosis, which would immobilize the thumb also immobilizes the ngers, which is not necessary when a scaphoid fracture is suspected.
4. Of the following scaphoid fractures, which type is least likely
to require surgical xation?
a. A displaced fracture.
b. An unstable fracture.
c. A proximal pole fracture.
d. A waist or mid-pole fracture.
e correct answer is d. A waist or mid-pole fracture. Due to the tendency for delayed union and nonunion among scaphoid fractures, unstable and displaced fractures require sur­gical xation. Due to the limited vascularity to the proximal pole of the scaphoid, these injuries may also warrant surgical xation.
5. What should the physical therapist’s next course of action be
based on the patient’s history and examination?
Initiate active ROM exercises.
a.
b. Initiate light grip strengthening.
c. Provide the patient with a neutral wrist orthosis.
d. Refer the patient to a hand surgeon for further imaging.
e correct answer is d. Refer the patient to a hand sur- geon for further imaging. Even though initial radiographs were read as normal, the patient still may have a scaphoid frac­ture and may require cast xation or more advanced imaging.
Initiating rehabilitative exercises when suspecting an acute frac­ture would be contraindicated. e correct orthosis would be a thumb orthosis rather than a neutral-wrist orthosis.
Case Scenario 5
Your patient is a 28-year-old carpenter. He fell 10 feet o a ladder and sustained a right (dominant hand) distal radius frac­ture 2.5 weeks ago. He is now 14 days post-open reduction with internal volar plate xation and a prophylactic carpal tunnel release was also performed. He was referred to physical therapy for range of motion (ROM) exercises.
1.
Which of the following examination procedures would be most appropriate to perform prior to exercise prescription?
Active wrist ROM.
a.
b. Dexterity.
c. Grip strength.
d. Pinch strength.
e correct answer is a. Active wrist ROM. At 2 weeks post-surgery, the patient’s fracture is not healed enough for as­sessing or performing strength activities. e therapist instead should collect data on mobility of the wrist, where an active ROM assessment would be safe. Dexterity assessment may be performed at a later time but this is not the most appropriate for the rst postoperative visit.
2.
Primary goals for this early phase of recovery should include:
a. Achieve full tendon excursion and a full st.
b. Achieve full wrist active and passive ROM.
c.
Achieve grip strength at least 75% of the uninvolved side.
Achieve pinch strength at least 75% of the uninvolved
d.
side.
e correct answer is a. Achieve full tendon excursion and a full st. A priority for the rst 1 to 2 visits should be to achieve a full st. While the patient will be working on wrist ROM, at this point, nger ROM should be priority. Strength­ening is contraindicated at this point.
3. Treatment at postoperative week 2 for an individual with a
distal radius fracture and volar plating should include:
a. Edema management, dierential tendon gliding exercis-
es, and gentle wrist ROM.
b. Edema management, object manipulation, and stretch-
ing exercises for the wrist.
c. Object manipulation, grip strengthening, and uido-
therapy.
d. Scar management, grip strengthening, and stretching
exercises for the wrist.
e correct answer is a. Edema management, dierential tendon gliding exercises, and gentle wrist ROM. Edema con-
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
59
trol is very important in the hand so that it does not become
https://t.me/med1917
chronic and limit tendon excursion. Tendon gliding is also im­portant because it will help improve nger ROM, decrease ede­ma, and allow tendon excursion over the surgical plate. Tendon scarring over the surgical plate will limit nger ROM and pos­sibly lead to the need for another surgery. Gentle wrist ROM is important at this point to allow joint mobility but also protect the healing fracture site. Stretching exercises are too aggressive and should not be implemented at 2 weeks after surgery, and grip strengthening is also contraindicated at this point due to the acuity of the fracture.
4.
At 8 weeks post-surgery, the patient is able to make a full st, his wrist active ROM is 90% of the opposite side, and his baseline grip strength measurement shows grip strength
REFERENCES
that is 30% of the opposite side. Assuming the patient has adequate bone healing at this point, which of the following exercises would be appropriate to initiate?
Intrinsic muscle stretching.
a. b. Light, progressive resisted wrist exercise with dumbbells. c. Plyometrics. d. Stretching the extrinsic tendons.
e correct answer is b. Light, progressive resisted wrist
exercise with dumbbells. At 8 weeks and with adequate heal­ing, it is safe to allow resisted activities to increase forearm strength. Plyometrics are too aggressive at this point and intrin­sic and extrinsic stretching are not likely appropriate given the patient’s current ROM at the ngers and wrist.
1. Erickson M, Smith H, Waggy C, Pratt N. Anatomy and kine­siology of the hand. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:1-18.
2.
Cotterell IH, Richard MJ. Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures
in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(1):69-98. doi: 10.1016/j. csm.2014.09.009
Panchal-Kildare S, Malone K. Skeletal anatomy of the
3. hand. Hand Clin. 2013;29(4):459-471. doi: 10.1016/j. hcl.2013.08.001
4.
Duncan SFM, Saracevic CE, Kakinoki R. Biomechanics of
the hand. Hand Clin. 2013;29(4):483-492. doi: 10.1016/j. hcl.2013.08.003
American Society for Surgery of the Hand. e Hand: Examina-
5. tion and Diagnosis. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
6. Garcia-Elias M, Dobyns JH. Bones and joints. In: Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, eds. e Wrist: Diagnosis and Opera- tive Treatment. Vol 1. Mosby; 1998:61-72.
7.
Catalano LW, Minhas S V, Kirby DJ. Evaluation and man-
agement of carpal fractures other than the scaphoid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(15):e651-e661. doi: 10.5435/ JAAOS-D-20-00062
8. McKinnis LN. Radiologic evaluation of the hand and wrist. In: McKinnis LN, ed. Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Imaging. 4th ed. F.A. Davis; 2014:593-650.
9. Schuind GA, Linscheid RL. Mechanics of the distal radioul­nar joint. In: Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, eds. e Wrist: Diagnosis and Operative Treatment. Vol 1. Mosby; 1998:219-233.
10. Lauder J, Waitayawinyu T. Carpal avascular necrosis: Kien­böck Disease and Preiser Disease. In: Trumble TE, Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME, Slutsky DJ, eds. Principles of Hand erapy and Surgery. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017:490-508.
11. Adams BD, Mitchell SA. e distal radioulnar joint and triangular brocartilage complex. In: Trumble TE, Rayan GM,
Budo JE, Baratz ME, Slutsky DJ, eds. Principles of Hand er- apy and Surgery. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017:117-143.
Norkin CC, White DJ. Normative range of motion values. In:
12.
Measurement f Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. F.A. Davis; 2016:537-541.
13.
Beasley J, Lunsford D. e arthritic hand: conservative manage-
ment. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, ed. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. Elsevier; 2020:1209-1226.
14. Meals C, Meals RA. Hand fractures: a review of current treat-
ment strategies. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(5):1021-1031; quiz
1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.017
15.
Noureldin M, Kakar S. umb fractures. In: Hayton M, Funk
L, Walton M, Ng CY, Watts A, eds. Sports Injuries in the Hand and Wrist. Springer Nature; 2019:125-150.
16.
Yu HL, Chase RA, Strauch B. Atlas of Hand Anatomy and Clini-
cal Implications. Mosby; 2004.
17. Gottschalk MB, Kakar S. Surgical management of the osteo­arthritic thumb CMC joint. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Reha- bilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:1254-1260.
18. Zelouf DS, Wilson MS, Hussain H. Anatomy and kinesiology of the wrist. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:19-27.
19. Garcia-Elias M, Cooney WP. Kinematics of the radiocarpal joint. In: Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, eds. e Wrist: Diagnosis and Operative Treatment. Mosby Inc.; 1998:205-233.
20.
Fowler TP. Intercarpal ligament injuries associates with distal
radius fractures. J Acta Orthop Surg. 2019;27(20):e893-e901. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00503
21. Horii E, Garcia-Elias M, An KN. Force transmission through the radiocarpal joint. In: Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, eds. e Wrist: Diagnosis and Operative Treatment. Mosby Inc.; 1998:190-204.
22. Palmer AK. Triangular brocartilage complex lesions: a classication. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(4):594-606. doi:
10.1016/0363-5023(89)90174-3
60
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
23. Talesnik J. e ligaments of the wrist. J Hand Surg Am.
https://t.me/med1917
1976;1(12):110-118. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(76)80004-4
24.
Seigerman D, Lutsky K, Fletcher D, et al. Complication in
the management of distal radius fractures: how do we avoid them. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(2):204-212. doi:
10.1007/s12178-019-09544-8
Trumble TE, Lemay K. Flexor tendon injuries. In: Trumble TE,
25.
Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME, Slutsky DJ, eds. Principle of Hand Surgery. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017:251-277.
26.
Moutet F, Bouyer M, Corcella D, Forli A, Semer A. Climber’s
pulley injuries. In: Hayton M, Funk L, Walton M, Ng CY, Watts A, eds. Sports Injuries in the Hand and Wrist. Springer Nature; 2019:81-100.
American Physical erapy Association. Guide to Physical
27. erapist Practice 3.0. Accessed March 29, 2019. http://guide­toptpractice.apta.org/content/1/SEC2.body
28.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C,. Development of
an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Dis­abilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) [corrected]. e Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-608. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097­0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L
29.
Institute for Work and Health. e DASH outcome measure:
disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand. Accessed April 7, 2021. https://www.iwh.on.ca/tools-and-guides/dash-out­come-measure
30. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle RS, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(8):577-586. doi:
10.1097/00005131-199811000-00009
31. Levine D, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75(11):1585-1592. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000­00002
32. Detullio LM, Wolfe DW, Strohl AB. Clinical examination of the hand. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Ama­dio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:46-61.
33. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. e patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):1960-1965; discus­sion 1966-1967. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56
34. Callahan AD. Sensibility assessment for nerve lesions-in-conti­nuity and nerve lacerations [archived version from 5th edition]. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. Published July 2011. https://expertconsult.inkling.com/read/skirven-re­habilitation-hand-upper-extremity-7e/supplemental-materials/ chapter-14-sensibility
Fawcett R, Linford S, Stulberg DL. Nail abnormalities: clues to
35. systemic disease. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(6):1417-1424.
36. Leard JS, Breglio L, Fraga L, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the gure-of-eight method of measuring hand size in patients with hand pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys er. 2004;34(6):335-340. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.6.335
37. Pettengill K, Van Strien G. Postoperative management of exor tendon injuries. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremi- ty. Vol 1. 6th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2011:457-478.
38. Carter TI, Pansy B, Wol AL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of three dierent techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(8):1422-
1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.002
39. Gajdosik RL. Comparison and reliability of three goniomet­ric methods for measuring forearm supination and prona­tion. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;93(2):353-355. doi: 10.2466/ pms.2001.93.2.353
40. Karagiannopoulos C, Sitler M, Michlovitz S. Reliability of 2 functional goniometric methods for measuring forearm prona­tion and supination active range of motion. J Orthop Sports Phys er. 2003;33(9):523-531. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.9.523
41. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, Desrosiers J, Bear-Lehman J. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-anal­ysis. Physiotherapy. 2006;92(1):11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.phys­io.2005.05.003
42. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of hand strength evaluation. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9(2):222-226. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80146-x
43. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69-74.
44. Wu F, Rajpura A, Sandher D. Finkelstein’s test is superior to Eichho’s test in the investigation of de Quervain’s disease. J Hand Microsurg. 2018;10(2):116-118. doi: 10.1055/s-0038­1626690
45. Dawson C, Mudgal CS. Staged description of the Finkelstein test. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(9):1513-1515. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2010.05.022
46. Yonnet GJ. Intersection syndrome in a handcyclist: case report and literature review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013;19(3):236-243. doi: 10.1310/sci1903-236
47. Skinner TM. Intersection syndrome: the subtle squeak of an overused wrist. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(4):547-551. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170053
48. Sauvé PS, Rhee PC, Shin AY, Lindau T. Examination of the wrist: radial-sided wrist pain. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(10):2089-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.036
49. Kayalar M, Vatansever A, Bal E, Torgos T, Ozaksar K, Ada S. e importancy of nger extension test in the diagnosis of oc­cult wrist ganglion. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(1):42-
47.
50. Kitay A, Wolfe SW. Scapholunate instability: current con­cepts in diagnosis and management. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(10):2175-2196. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.035
51. LaStayo P, Howell J. Clinical provocative tests used in evaluating wrist pain: a descriptive study. J Hand er. 1995;8(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80150-5
52. Valdes K, LaStayo P. e value of provocative tests for the wrist and elbow: a literature review. J Hand er. 2013;26(1):32-42; quiz 43. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.08.005
53. Garcia-Elias M. Carpal instability. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, eds. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 6th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2011:465-522.
54. Caggiano N, Matullo KS. Carpal instability of the wrist. Orthop Clin N Am. 2014;45(1):129-140. doi: 10.1016/j. ocl.2013.08.009
55. Prosser R, Harvey L, LaStayo P, Hargreaves I, Scougall P, Herbert RD. Provocative wrist tests and MRI are of limited di­agnostic value for suspected wrist ligament injuries: A cross-sec­tional study. J Physiother. 2011;57(4):247-253. doi:10.1016/ S1836-9553(11)70055-8
56. Lichtman DM, Wroten ES. Understanding midcarpal insta­bility. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(3):491-498. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2005.12.014
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
61
57. Feinstein WK, Lichtman DM, Noble PC, Alexander JW, Hipp
https://t.me/med1917
JA. Quantitative assessment of the midcarpal shift test. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(5):977-983. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0977
58. Tay SC, Tomita K, Berger RA. e “ulnar fovea sign” for dening ulnar wrist pain: an analysis of sensitivity and speci­city. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(4):438-444. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2007.01.022
59. Schmauss D, Pöhlmann S, Lohmeyer JA, Germann G, Bickert B, Megerle K. Clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging have limited diagnostic value for triangular brocartilaginous complex lesions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(6):873-
880. doi:10.1007/s00402-016-2441-9
60. Skirven TM, Osterman AL. Clinical examination of the wrist. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Mosby Inc; 2020:62-75.
61. Ambrose L, Posner M. Lunotriquetral and midcarpal joint instability. Hand Clin. 1999;8(4):653-668.
62. Kirchberge MC, Unglaub F, Mühldorfer-Fodorm M, et al. Up­date TFCC: histology and pathology, classication, examination and diagnostics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(3):427-
437. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2153-6
63. Kim JP, Park MJ. Assessment of distal radioulnar joint in­stability after distal radius fracture: comparison of comuted tomography and clinical examination results. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(9):1486-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.017
64. Hahn P, Wolf MB, Unglaub F. Bilateral test for poten­tial subluxation of the DRUJ. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(10):1459-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1814-6
65. Vezeridid PS, Yoshioka H, Han R, Blazar P. Ulnar-sided wrist pain. Part I: anatomy and physical examination. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39(8):733-745. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0775-x
66. Raskin KB, Beldner S. Clinical examination of the distal ulna. Hand Clin. 1998;14(2):177-190.
67. Sela Y, Seftchick J, Wang WL, Baratz ME. e diagnostic clini­cal value of thumb metacarpal grind, pressure-shear, exion, and extension tests for carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand er. 2019;32(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.005
68. Tosti R, Jacoby SM. Intraarticular and fractures and joint injuries. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, ed. Rehabiliation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2020:310-321.
69. Sartorio F, Bravini E, Vercelli S, et al. e Functional Dexter­ity Test: test-retest reliability analysis and up-to date reference norms. J Hand er. 2013;26(1):62-67; quiz 68. doi: 10.1016/j. jht.2012.08.001
70. van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, vab der Linde H. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):151-169. doi:
10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.024
71. Poole JL, Burtner PA, Torres TA, et al. Measuring dexteri­ty in children using the Nine-Hole Peg Test. J Hand er. 2005;18(3):348-351. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.003
72. Reddon JR, Gill DM, Gauk SE, Maerz MD. Purdue Pegboard: test-retest estimates. Percept Mot Skills. 1988;66(2):503-506. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.503
73. Mathiowetz V, Rogers SL, Dowe-Keval M, Donahoe L, Rennells C. e Purdue Pegboard: norms for 14- to 19-year olds. Am J Occup er. 1986;40(3):174-179. doi: 10.5014/ajot.40.3.174
74. Bell-Krotoski JA. Sensibility testing: history, instrumenta­tion, and clinical procedures. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL,
Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. Vol 1. 6th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2011:132-151.
75. Dellon AL, Kallman CH. Evaluation of functional sensation in
the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8(6):865-870. doi: 10.1016/ s0363-5023(83)80083-5
Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EW, Figarola JH. reshold detec-
76.
tion and Semmes-Weinstein monolaments. J Hand er. 1995;8(2):155-162. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80314-0
77.
Gelberman RH, Szabo RM, Williamson RV, Dimick MP. Sensi-
bility testing in peripheral-nerve compression syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65(5):632-638.
Darowish M, Sharma J. Evaluation and treatment of chronic
78.
hand conditions. Med Clin N Am. 2014;98(4):801-815, xii. doi:
10.1016/j.mcna.2014.03.006.
Lutsky KF, Giang EL, Matzon JL. Flexor tendon injury, repair
79.
and rehabilitation. Orthop Clin N Am. 2015;46(1):67-76. doi:
10.1016/j.ocl.2014.09.004
Dy CJ, Daluiski A, Do HT, Hernandez-Soria A, Marx R,
80. Lyman S. e epidemiology of reoperation after exor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(5):919-924. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2012.02.003
81.
Wu YF, Tang JB. Tendon healing, edema, and resistance
to exor tendon gliding: clinical implications. Hand Clin. 2013;29(2):167-178. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.002
Amadio PC. Advances in understanding of tendon healing and
82. repairs and impact on postoperative management. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2020:394-401.
Tang JB, Amadio PC, Boyer MI, et al. Current practice
83. of primary exor tendon repair: a global view. Hand Clin. 2013;29(2):179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.003
84.
Silva JM, Zhao C, An KN, Zobitz ME, Amadio PC. Gliding
resistance and strength of composite sutures in human exor digitorum profundus tendon repair: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2008.09.020
Miller B, Dodds SD, DeMars A, Zagoreas N, Waitayawinyu
85. T, Trumble TE. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of Fiber­wire on grasping and locking core sutures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(5):591-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.003
86. Tang JB, Zhou X, Pan ZJ, Qing J, Gong KT, Chen J. Strong digital exor tendon repair, extension-exion test, and early active exion: experience in 300 tendons. Hand Clin. 2017;33(3):455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.04.012
87.
Tang JB, Lalonde D. Surgery management of exor tendon
injuries. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabiliation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:402-414.
Cannon NM. erapy management of exor tendon injuries
88. and repairs. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabiliation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:415-441.
89. Zhao C, Amadio PC, Tanaka T, et al. Eect of gap size on gliding resistance after exor tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(11):2482-2488. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000­00019
90.
Lalonde D, Martin A. Epinephrine in local anesthesia in
nger and hand surgery: the case for wide-awake anesthesia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(8):443-447. doi: 10.5435/ JAAOS-21-08-443
Lalonde DH, Martin AL. Wide-awake exor tendon repair
91. and early tendon mobilization in zones 1 and 2. Hand Clin. 2013;29(2):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.009
62
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
92. Von Der Heyde R. Flexor tendon injuries in children: re-
https://t.me/med1917
habilitative options and confounding factors. J Hand er. 2015;28(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.12.002
93.
Cooper L, Khor W, Burr N, Sivakumar B. Flexor tendon repairs
in children: outcomes from a specialist tertiary centre. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2015;68(5):717-723. doi: 10.1016/j. bjps.2014.12.024
Abzug JM, Weesner H, Case AL. Pediatric upper extremity
94. trauma. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabiliation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:1798-1814.
95.
Cao Y, Tang JB. Investigation of resistance of digital subcuta-
neous edema to gliding of the exor tendon: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(6):1248-1254. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2005.07.010
Morrell NT, Hulvey A, Elsinger J, Zhang G, Shafritz AB. Team
96. approach: repair and rehabilitation following exor tendon lacerations. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(1):01874474-201701000-00003. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00013
97.
Piper SL, Lattanza L. Extensor tendon injuries. In: Trumble TE,
Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME, Slutsky DJ, eds. Principles of Hand Surgery and erapy. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017.
98. Evans RB. Rehabilitation following extensor tendon injury and repair. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. Vol 1. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2020:464-480.
99. Roh YH, Lee BK, Park MH, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Ef­fects of health literacy on treatment outcome and satisfaction in patients with mallet nger injury. J Hand er. 2016;29(4):459-
464. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.004
100. Grau L, Baydoun H, Chen K, Sankary ST, Amirouche F, Gon­zalez MH. Biomechanics of the acute Boutonniere deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(1):80.e1-80.e6. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2017.07.011
101. Lovy AJ, Elhassan BT. Rehabilitaiton following extensor tendon injury and repair. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabiliation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:442-
463.
102. Dy CJ, Rosenblatt L, Lee SK. Current methods and biome­chanics of extensor tendon repairs. Hand Clin. 2013;29(2):261-
268. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.008
103. Evans RB, ompson DE. e application of force to the healing tendon. J Hand er. 1993;6(4):266-284. doi: 10.1016/ s0894-1130(12)80328-0
Merritt WH. Relative motion splint: Active motion af-
104. ter extensor tendon injury and repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(6):1187-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.03.015
105. Howell JW, Merritt WH, Robinson SJ. Immediate controlled active motion following zone 4-7 extensor tendon repair. J Hand er. 2005;18(2):182-190. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.02.011
Cheah AEJ, Yao J. Hand fractures: indications, the tried and
106. true and new innovations. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(6):712-
722. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.03.007
107. Day CS, Stern PJ. Fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, eds. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 6th ed. Elsevier Churchill Liv­ingstone; 2011:239-290.
108. Carpenter S, Rohde RS. Treatment of phalangeal frac­tures. Hand Clin. 2013;29(4):519-534. doi: 10.1016/j. hcl.2013.08.006
109. Lehman TP. Hand fractures: current concepts. Orthop Knowl Online J. 2012;10(3).
110. Shuler MS, Roskosky M, Kinney J, Elstad Z. Phalangeal frac­tures and interphalangeal joint injuries. In: Trumble TE, Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME, Slutsky DJ, eds. Principles of Hand Surgery and erapy. 3rd ed. Elsevier Inc; 2017:27-55.
111.
Baltzer HL, Moran SL. Flexor digitorum profundus avulsion in-
juries. In: Hayton M, Ng C, Funk L, Watts A, Walton M, eds. Sports Injuries in the Hand and Wrist. Springer Nature; 2019.
Wahl EP, Richard MJ. Management of metacarpal and phalan-
112. gealfractures in the athlete. Clin Sport Med. 2020;39(2):401-
422. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.002
113.
Feehan LM. erapy management of exrta-articular hand frac-
tures. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2020:295-301.
Baratz ME, Bauman JT. Simple hand fractures that aren’t. Hand
114. Clin. 2006;22(3):243-251. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2006.03.002
115.
Geissler WB. Operative xation of metacarpal and phalan-
geal fractures in athletes. Hand Clin. 2009;25(3):409-421. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2009.05.005
116.
Lehman TP, Rayanm G.M. Fractures and ligament injuries
of the thumb and metacarpals. In: Trumble TE, Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME, Slutsky DJ, eds. Principles of Hand Sur- gery and erapy. 3rd ed. Elsevier Inc; 2017:1-26.
117. Strub B, Schindele S, Sonderegger J, Sproedt J, von campe A, Gruenert JG. Intramedullary splinting or conservative treatment for displaced fractures of the little nger metacarpal neck? A prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;35(9):725-729. doi: 10.1177/1753193410377845
118. Gallagher KG, Blackmore S, Corbin S, Feldscher SB. In­tra-articular hand fractures and joint injuries, part II: therapy management. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, ed. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:322-344.
Chinchalker SJ, Gan BS. Management of proximal interpha-
119. langeal joint injuries. J Hand er. 2003;16(2):117-128. doi:
10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80007-8
120.
Trumble TE. Scaphoid fractures. In: Trumble TE, Rayan GM,
Budo JE, Baratz ME SD, ed. Principles of Hand Surgery and erapy. 3rd ed. 2017:100-116.
121. Strauch RJ. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis--update on evaluation and treatment. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(4):729-735. doi:
10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.018
122. Marchessault J, Conti M, Baratz ME. Carpal fractures in ath­letes excluding the scaphoid. Hand Clin. 2009;25(3):371-388. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.05.013
123. Lichtman DM, Alexander AH. e Wrist and Its Disorders. 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders; 1997.
124. Mayeld JK, Johnson RK, Kilcoyne RK. Carpal disloca­tions: pathomechanics and progressive perilunar instability. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5(3):226-241. doi: 10.1016/s0363­5023(80)80007-4
125.
Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH. e Wrist: Diagnosis
and Operative Management. Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1998.
126. Rosenwasser MP, Zeltser DW. Carpal instability. In: Trumble TE, Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME SD, ed. Principles of Hand Surgery and erapy. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017:70-99.
127. Levin SL, Rozell JC, Pulos N. Distal radius fracture in the elderly. J Acta Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):179-187. doi: 10.5435/ JAAOS-D-15-00676
128. Bales JG, Stern PJ. Treatment strategies for distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012;28(2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j. hcl.2012.02.003
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
63
129. Arora R, Gabl M, Erhart S, Schmidle G, Dallapozza C, Lutz
https://t.me/med1917
M. Aspects of current management of distal radius fractures in the elderly individuals. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011;2(5-
6):187-194. doi: 10.1177/2151458511426874
130. Egol KA, Walsh M, Romo-Cardoso S, Dorsky S, Paksima N. Distal radius fractures in the elderly: operative com­pared with non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(9):1851-1857. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00968
131. Orbay J. Volar plate xation of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2005;21(3):347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.02.003
132.
Gordan JA, Hanel DP. Surgery management of distal radius
fractures. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Ama­dio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, ed. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:818-832.
133. Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 6th ed. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone;
2011.
Rajah G. Fractures and malunions of the distal radius. In:
134. Trumble TE, Rayan GM, Budo JE, Baratz ME SD, ed. Prin- ciples of Hand Surgery and erapy. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2017:151-
179.
135. Geissler WB, Freeland AE, Savoie FH, McIntyre LW, Whipple T. Intracarpal soft-tissue lesions associated with an intra-artic­ular fracture of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(3):357-365. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199603000­00006
Forward DP, Lindau TR, Melsom DS. Intercarpal ligament
136. injuries associated with fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2334-2340. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.F.01537
137.
Pilny J, Kubes J, Hoza P, Mechl M, Visna P. Scapholunate
instability of the wrist following distal radius fracture. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007;74(1):55-58.
Roth KM, Blazar PE, Earp BE, Han R, Leung A. Incidence of
138. extensor pollicis longus rupture after nondisplaced distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(5):942-947. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsa.2012.02.006
139. Kirby E, Sparrow S. A retrospective analysis of the number of therapy visits after distal radius fractures using a new provid­er-scored severity scale. J Hand er. 2018;31(4):480-485. doi:
10.1016/j.jht.2017.06.008
140. Naughton N, Algar L. erapy management of distal radius fractures. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Ama­dio PC, Feldscher SB, Shin EK, ed. Rehabiliation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:833-850.
141. Gutierrez-Espinoza H, Rubio-Oyarzun D, Olgun-Huerta C, Gutierrez-Monclus R, Pinta-Concha S, Gana-Hervias G. Su­pervised physical therapy vs home exercise program for patients with distal radius fractures: a single-blind randomized clinical study. J Hand er. 2017;30(3):242-252. doi: 10.1016/j. jht.2017.02.001
142.
Valdes K, Naughton N, Burke CJ. erapist supervised hand
therapy versus home therapy with therapist instruction follow­ing distal radius fracture. J Hand er. 2015;40(6):1110-1116. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.036
143. Gregush RE, Habusta SF. Ganglion cyst. In: StatPearls. LE- COM/Millcreek Community Hospital; LECOM: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2020.
144. McKeon KE, London DA, Osei DA, et al. Ligamentous hyperlaxity and dorsal wrist ganglions. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(11):2138-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.109
145. Friere V, Guérini H, Campagna R, et al. Imaging of hand and wrist cysts: a clinical approach. AJR Amer J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5):W618-W628. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8087
146. Mathoulin C, Gras M. Arthroscopic management of dorsal
and volar wrist ganglion. Hand Clin. 2017;33(4):769-777. doi:
10.1016/j.hcl.2017.07.012
147.
Minotti P, Taras JS. Ganglion cysts of the wrist. J Hand Surg
Am. 2002;2(2):102-107. doi: 1-/1-53kssj/2002.33318
Goiney C, Porrino J, Richardson ML, Mulcahy H, Chew FS.
148. Characterization and epidemiology of the carpal boss utiliz­ing computed tomography. J Wrist Surg. 2017;6(1):22-32. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1583941]
149.
Head L, Gencarelli JR, Allen M, Boyd KU. Wrist ganglion
treatment systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(3):546-553.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.12.014
Cheung K, Walley KC, Rozental TD. Management of compli-
150. cations of Dupuytren contracture. Hand Clin. 2015;31:345-
354. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.01.005
151.
Lanting R, Broekstra DC, Werker PMN, van den Heuvel ER.
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of Du­puytren disease in the general population of western countries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):593-603. doi: 10.1097/01. prs.0000438455.37604.0f
152.
Hurst LC, Le T, MacGillis K. Surgery management of Dupu-
ytren’s disease. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldsher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:223-237.
Sweet S, Blackmore SM. Surgical and therapy update on the
153. management of Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand er. 2014;27:77­83; quiz 84. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.10.006
Ball C, Izadi D, Verjee LS, Chan J, Nanchahal J. Systematic
154. review of non-surgical treatments for early dupuytren’s disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):345. doi:10.1186/ s12891-016-1200-y
155. Cooper TB, Poonit K, Yao C, Jin Z, Zheng J, Yan H. e ecacies and limitations of fasciectomy and collagenase clostridium histolyticum in Dupuytren’s contracture management: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(2):2309499020921747. doi: 10.1177/230 9499020921747
156.
Huisstede BM, Gladdines S, Randsdorp MS, Koes BW. Eec-
tiveness of conservative, surgical, and postsurgical interventions for trigger nger, Dupuytren disease, and De Quervain disease: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(8):1635-
1649.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.014
157. Soreide E, Murad MH, Denbeigh JM, et al. Treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(9):1138-1145. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B9. BJJ-2017-1194.R2
158. Peimer CA, Blazar P, Coleman S, Kaplan FT, Smith T, Lindau T. Dupuytren contracture recurrence following treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CORDLESS [collagenase option for reduction of Dupuytren long-term evaluation of safety study]): 5-year data. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(8):1597-
1605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.036
159. Evans RB, Skirven TM, DeTullio LM. erapy management of Dupuytren’s disease. In: Skirven TM, Osterman AL, Fedorczyk JM, Amadio PC, Feldsher SB, Shin EK, eds. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity. 7th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2020:238-
249.
160. Sato J, Ishii Y, Noguchi H. Clinical and ultrasound features in patients with intersection syndrome or de Quervain’s disease. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41(2):220-225. doi:
10.1177/1753193415614267
161. Shen PC, Wang PH, Wu PT, Wu KC, Hsieh JL, Jou IM. e estrogen receptor-β expression in De Quervain’s disease.
64
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.