Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_138_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
87 Мб
Скачать
common instability pattern or dissociation, the SL dissociation.
https://t.me/med1917
is is also known as a scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) wrist. In this case, one will note a signicant gap between the scaphoid and the lunate and an abnormally rotated scaphoid. e scaphoid, having freedom of motion due to its lack of as­sociation with the lunate, is exing excessively creating a view where the distal portion of the bone appears as the base of a ring and the proximal pole becomes the stone—the ring sign. A lateral view typically shows an abnormally rotated lunate (tilted in a dorsal direction) creating a DISI pattern. Compare Figure 23A, showing a positive DISI pattern on a lateral wrist lm to a normal wrist (Figure 2B). e DISI pattern develops as the lu­nate has lost its exion tendency because of its ligamentous sep­aration from the scaphoid and instead follows the triquetrum, which tends to pull the lunate into extension. e result is the dorsal tilt indicative of a SL ligament dissociation.
e much less common LT ligament disruption results in the opposite positioning with the lunate following the scaphoid into exion leading to a resting posture representative of a VISI
(Figure 23B). ese are both examples of carpal instability dis­sociative patterns where disruptions are occurring within the same carpal row.
In contrast, a carpal instability non-dissociative pattern in­stability is evident between rows. Going back to the PA wrist radiograph in Figure 22, there is also evidence of disruption of the midcarpal row as the capitate is now pressing into the distal surfaces of the lunate and scaphoid. is particular nding is that of a carpal instability combined pattern where there is now evidence of instability both within and between the carpal rows. Once the wrist reaches this point, clinically, there are current­ly few options to provide relief with proximal row carpectomy and partial wrist arthrodesis (ie, 4-corner fusion) being possi­ble treatment options that show some success with maintaining wrist mobility, recovering partial grip strength, and decreasing
121
pain levels.
Rehabilitation must be carefully progressed as re­covering pain-free or minimal pain mobility within functional ROM and strength are long-term goals at this point of wrist disruption.
Figure 22.
Scapholunate Dissociation
Figure 23.
A
B
Wrist Instability
Posterior-anterior radiograph showing ring sign, gap between scaphoid and lunate, impingement on radial styloid, and disruption of both radiocarpal and mid­carpal rows.
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
A, Dorsal intercalated segmental instability; scaphol­unate angle >60°. B, Volar intercalated segmental in­stability; scapholunate angle <30°; refer to Figure 2B for normal scapholunate angle (30-60°).
45
Symptoms and signs associated with the most common of
https://t.me/med1917
the carpal instability patterns, the SL dissociation, include the following:
Symptoms:
Pain on the radial side of the wrist at rest or with activities;
• Complaints of decreased grip strength; and
• Pain with attempts of wrist and hand weight-bearing (closed chain) activities.
Signs:
• Tenderness to palpation over the scaphoid tuberosity, waist, or SL joint line;
• Laxity of the SL joint with the ballottement test;
• Possibly a positive scaphoid shift test; and
• Radiographic evidence as noted earlier.
Surgeons treat acute ligament injuries with a primary re-
pair, pinning, and immobilization with the overall goal of re-
126
establishing soft tissue integrity.
Chronic injuries may lead to the dynamic, and then static, conditions described above necessitating more limited treatment options with expectations of only partial mobility, strength, and varying levels of pain re-
126
lief.
Distal radius fractures
Due to the frequency of this fracture, particularly in the older adult population, this injury deserves discussion; however, the literature on both treatment and rehabilitation continues to
127
point to areas of disagreement. Levin et al
noted the distal radius is the second most commonly fractured bone in elderly persons. e majority of recent studies, dene the age range for the elderly population as 50 to 75 years. Historically, patients were treated with nonsurgical care (closed reduction and cast stabilization) or surgical options such as percutaneous pinning or external xation. Advances in surgical stabilization have led to an increase in operative treatments with volar or dorsal plat­ing systems. Common thinking is that better maintenance of anatomical reduction with the opportunity to perform earlier motion following ORIF would provide better outcomes. Bales
128
and Stern
noted several studies comparing nonoperative ver­sus surgical treatment (pinning, external xation, volar and dor­sal plating systems). Surprising was the lack of support for the subjective superiority of surgical over nonsurgical treatment. e most consistent nding was increased grip strength at most data points with surgical interventions. Of note, however, is that the majority of these studies involved patients 65 years of age and older with varying levels of desired activity.
129,130
ough the use of named fractures is being discouraged to minimize confusion in describing specic injury patterns, the name Colles fracture is still often used clinically. A Colles frac­ture is an extraarticular fracture occurring 1.5 to 2 inches prox­imal to the articular surface of the distal radius with angular
displacement dorsally. e mechanism of injury is the FOOSH with the wrist in hyperextension and some forearm supination. Seen much less frequently, a fall onto the exed wrist and pro­nated forearm, results in a volar angulated distal fragment and is termed a Smith fracture. Nonsurgical care for a dorsally dis­placed distal radius fracture includes an attempt at closed man­ual reduction and stabilization by an orthosis or cast for 6 to 8 weeks. Patients are often brought back for repeat radiographs in the rst 3 weeks to assess maintenance of the reduction. Sig­nicant loss of radial height or excessive dorsal angulation of the distal radius may be cause for the patient to require surgical xation. Distal radius fractures that involve shear displacement, or articular surface step-os, may be treated with various hard­ware techniques that can range from percutaneous pinning to external xators to volar or dorsal plating systems. e volar plating systems have increased in popularity since the 1990s.
131
Proponents of this system note an improved restoration of the articular surface, radial inclination, and bone length with fewer postoperative complications compared to other xation tech-
127
niques.
e volar plate clinically has allowed earlier return to
motion of the wrist, decreased immobilization time, and posi-
132
tive patient reports on patient satisfaction surveys.
In a 2011 randomized prospective study, volar plating was compared with closed reduction and cast immobilization in patients older than
65. ough the surgery group showed better wrist function in the early postoperative period, at 6 and 12 months, there was no signicant dierence in wrist function or pain between the 2
129
groups.
e authors also reported better grip strength in the
surgical group at all time points.
127
Levin et al
notes that patients need to be informed of the high probability of a cosmetic wrist deformity when distal radial fractures are treated nonsurgically, with malunion noted in up to 89% of patients. Decision-making algorithms for the treat­ment of distal radius fractures may be reviewed in sources such
133
as the book, Green’s Operative Hand Surgery.
ese fractures occur in patients of all ages, activity levels, and life demands leaving the management decisions up to the treating physician
132
and the individual patient. Gordan and Hanel
emphasizes that low-demand older adults may be a unique situation where patients can accept some bone deformity (lack of complete an­atomic reduction) yet do very well in their desired activities. In their discussion of the postoperative care with this patient population, they note the most appropriate rehabilitation in­tervention may include a home evaluation for balance and fall risk assessment as opposed to the isolated focus on restoring maximum wrist recovery.
Multiple associated injuries may occur with a distal radi-
134
us fracture. Rajah
lists the following: carpal and distal ulna fractures, intercarpal ligament sprains, TFCC injuries, and me­dian nerve injuries. Arthroscopic studies demonstrated rate of SL interosseous ligament injury as high as 32% and TFCC in-
20
jury as high as 49%. Fowler
in a review paper notes SL and LT
interosseous ligament injuries occur in approximately one-third
46
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
of distal radius fractures, leading to the belief that arthroscopy
https://t.me/med1917
may be required to adequately assess the integrity of the carpal ligaments. ere appears to be a correlation of fractures involv­ing the lunate facet as a predominant fracture pattern involving the intracarpal ligaments.
135
Forward et al
136
found radial short-
ening >2mm was correlated with intercarpal ligament injuries.
137
Pilny et al
followed 75 patients post distal radius fractures. Sixteen of the 75 patients developed radiographic and clinical evidence of wrist instability with all 16 patients exhibiting ev­idence of increased wrist pain with use, decreased wrist mo­tion, and decreased grip strength compared to those without
20
evidence of carpal instability. Fowler
concludes that high-level evidence to guide clinical decisions is lacking regarding treat­ment of these associated ligament injuries.
Of note, rupture of the EPL can be a late complication of nonsurgical treatment of a distal radius fracture. Potential explanations for the spontaneous rupture are irritation across fracture fragments and necrosis from a hematoma that often develops in the connes of the third extensor compartment.
138
Roth et al
reported an incidence rate of 5% with the rupture
occurring on average 6.6 weeks post-fracture.
Current literature focusing on the superiority of outcomes in regards to recovery of functional activities, pain relief, and patient satisfaction show little dierence between surgical ver­sus nonsurgical care, other than the improved grip strength as noted earlier. Also, the role of formal rehabilitation as opposed to an independent home program in this patient population have been and continue to be an area of interest. A retrospec­tive study noted that limitations in total ROM of the ngers and the motion of the forearm (total active motion [TAM] in supination and pronation) as the 2 indicators which increased
139
the number of visits to therapy.
Pain levels, edema, and wrist motions did not appear to aect the number of visits signi­cantly in this retrospective review of 89 patients with distal ra­dius fracture.
Care should always be taken that noninvolved joints of the upper extremity are moved. Casting should be comfortable and allow full motion of the ngers. is should include dieren­tial tendon gliding exercises (4-stage tendon glide, supercialis sting, and blocking exercises) and intrinsic muscle gliding ex­ercises in which the patient moves actively from the intrinsic plus (MP joints exed and IP joints extended) position to the intrinsic minus (MP joints extended and IP joints exed) po­sition. A cast distal to the distal palmar crease will block full motion of the MP joints, and should be avoided if possible. Edema management should also be initiated in this early im­mobilization stage.
Active wrist motion begins as early as 1 to 3 weeks post-sur­gery for an extraarticular fracture treated with ORIF, 4 to 6 weeks post-surgery for an intraarticular fracture treated with ORIF, and after 5 to 6 weeks of cast immobilization for extraar-
134
ticular fractures treated nonsurgically.
e patient performs
active tenodesis exercises, gravity-assisted wrist ROM exercises,
and exercises using the place-hold technique. Forearm rotation exercises also begin with the purpose to regain supination and pronation. e late stages of rehabilitation focus on wrist and hand strengthening, endurance, and return-to-work activities as needed. Naughton and Algar
140
organize the treatment plan following distal radius fracture into early, intermediate, and advanced phases with suggestions for guidance into functional and advanced strengthening as needed. Specic examples of ex­ercises are included in their book chapter.
Clinical Pearl
e therapist should watch for substitution patterns throughout rehabilitation. Two common substitution pat­terns are humerus adduction and shoulder external rota­tion to compensate for lack of supination and use of the ED muscle to extend the wrist as a substitute for weak wrist extensor muscles.
One of the most frequent complaints after a radius fracture is ulnar column pain and swelling. is likely occurs because ulnar styloid fractures and DRUJ injuries are common in dis­placed distal radius fractures. e ulnar styloid is usually not repaired if the fragment is small and asymptomatic; however, surgeons may deem pinning necessary with a signicant frag­ment. Ulnar wrist pain and discomfort often increases when the patient begins isometrics or gentle strengthening because the force relationships that normally are 80% through the radius and 20% through the ulna shift to the ulnar side if the radius is shortened after fracture. e therapist must ascertain whether the discomfort is within expectations after fracture or is pos­sibly due to other complications such as DRUJ instability, a nonunion or malunion of the styloid fracture, median or ulnar nerve injury, complex regional pain syndrome, hardware prob­lems, or associated carpal ligament injuries.
Several publications have compared home exercise pro­grams versus formal therapy (clinical supervised rehabilitation). ere is evidence that uncomplicated fractures may have good outcomes with independent programs, however 2 recent studies note patients greater than 60 years of age or patients with com­plications or comorbidities are found to benet from a clinically supervised program.
141,142
SOFT TISSUE DISORDERS
Ganglion Cysts
Ganglion cysts are the most common soft-tissue mass in the wrist and hand. ey are synovial cysts lled with mucoid material that arise from the synovial lining of a joint or tendon sheath. ere is no consensus on the cause, but many authors agree that ganglion cysts arise from mesenchymal cells at the sy­novial capsular junction as a result of repetitive microtrauma. Repetitive microtrauma stimulates broblasts and production of hyaluronic acid that results in the mucin material found in
143
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
47
ganglion cysts.
https://t.me/med1917
143
McKeon et al
144
found an association between symptomatic dorsal wrist ganglions and generalized ligament hyperlaxity. ey reported 2.9 times greater odds of ligament laxity in patients with dorsal wrist ganglions.
e clinical course of a ganglion cyst is variable. Ganglion cysts generally begin small and progressively increase in size, but they can spontaneously disappear and reappear later in life.
145
Ganglion cysts are usually asymptomatic but can be painful and interfere with extremes of motion eventually impairing an in­dividual’s activity level. Approximately 70% of wrist ganglion cysts are on the dorsal surface and arise from the SL ligament or
143,146
SL articulation. with a dorsal ganglion. ey arise from the scaphotrapezial joint or radiocarpal joint.
Scapholunate instability can be associated
146
Volar wrist ganglia are less common.
143
Volar ganglia can adhere to the radial artery or cause ulnar or median nerve compression. Ganglion cysts are identied during a clinical examination as a rm, palpable mass, usually 1 to 3
143
cm in size.
e dierential diagnoses include solid tumors,
proliferative tenosynovitis, and a carpal boss.
In tenosynovitis, the cyst moves during tendon excursion,
147
but a ganglion cyst remains stationary.
A carpal boss is de­scribed as an osseous protuberance on the dorsal base of the second or third metacarpal that may involve the trapezoid or
148
capitate, but there is a lack of a standard denition.
Plain lm radiographs or computed tomography scans may be use­ful in conrming the presence of a carpal boss, but clinicians rarely use imaging to diagnose a ganglion cyst. Imaging may be used when the clinician is evaluating the patient for coexisting conditions, and in these cases, the preferred studies include ul-
145
trasound or MRI. dierentiating a ganglion cyst from a vascular malformation.
Diagnostic ultrasound can be helpful in
143
ere is no treatment indicated for patients who are asymp-
tomatic and electrophysical agents are generally ineective.
147
e 3 treatment options for symptomatic wrist ganglia are ob­servation, aspiration (often combined with steroid injection),
149
and surgical excision (open or arthroscopic).
149
review and meta-analysis, Head et al
found a mean recurrence
In a systematic
rate of 21% for open surgical excision versus 59% for aspira­tion. In their study, the mean recurrence for arthroscopic cyst excision was 6%; however, this result came from low-quality ev­idence, and the authors identied the need for more data from higher quality comparative trials using arthroscopy.
Postsurgical management includes edema control through elevation and nger AROM exercises initiated immediately fol­lowing surgery. Wrist ROM may also begin immediately un-
146
less there is a ligament repair.
erapy, either supervised or through a home exercise program, continues until the patient achieves full nger and wrist ROM and functional activities. Once the wound is healed, the patient begins scar management through compression and scar mobilization. It is important for the patient to achieve full excursion of the extrinsic wrist and nger exor (volar ganglia) and extensor (dorsal ganglia) ten­dons so there is no loss in ROM or resultant stiness. Com-
plications of surgical excision include infection, excessive scar formation, arterial or nerve damage, and postoperative stiness. Open surgical excision carries the highest complication rate,
149
14%.
Dupuytren Disease
Dupuytren disease (DD) or contracture, is a broprolifer-
150,151
ative disease of the digital and palmar fascia.
It begins as
a palpable nodule or mass in the palm at the level of the distal
152
palmar crease.
As the disease progresses, cords form and ex­tend distally and proximally. Over time, the cords shorten and thicken and eventually cause joint exion contractures at the MP and/or PIP joints although the clinical manifestations are quite variable.
152
e condition can be painful, but the pain is often self-limiting, nodules may regress, and contractures may
150
progress rapidly or go through periods of inactivity.
e origin of DD is attributed to both genetic and envi-
151
ronmental factors. European descent. Lanting et al
151
e typical patient is a male of northern
150
In a systematic review and meta-analysis,
found prevalence rates ranging from 0.6-31.6% in the general population of Western countries with increasing prevalence with increasing age. ere is conicting evidence regarding suspected risk factors such as alcohol consumption, smoking, manual labor, hand use, diabetes, and epilepsy.
Clinicians diagnose DD on a clinical examination through visual observation and palpation of the palmar nodules and cords. Due to the eects DD may have on many hand struc­tures, it is important to assess MP and IP joints AROM and PROM as well as integrity of soft tissue and neurovascular structures. e eects of DD on surrounding tissue include (1) attenuation of the extensor mechanism in zone III due to long-standing PIP joint exion, (2) development of a Bouton­nière deformity, (3) MP and PIP joints capsular contracture, (4) adaptive shortening of digital nerves, (5) encasement of digital nerves and arteries in Dupuytren cords, (6) exor muscle-ten­don tightness, (7) intrinsic (lumbrical and interosseus muscle) tightness and adaptive shortening, (8) joint incongruity, and (9) skin contracture and breakdown.
153
ere is limited and inconclusive evidence on the use of
154
rehabilitative interventions in management of DD.
Instead, treatment options include surgical approaches such as collage­nase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) Xiaex (Auxilium Phar­maceuticals, Inc, Malvern, PA) injection and manipulation, needle aponeurotomy, percutaneous needle fasciotomy, and fa-
150,153
sciectomy (open, limited, and segmental).
Indications for surgical treatment include an MP joint contracture of 30º or greater or a PIP joint contracture of 20º or greater with docu­mented progression, but surgery is considered on an individual
152
When treating a patient with CCH, the surgeon injects
basis. the CCH into the cord, which weakens it. Twenty-four hours later, the surgeon manipulates the digit by passively extending
155
the nger, disrupting or distending the cord.
Literature sug­gests the manipulation can occur up to 7 days following the
48
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
injection without a change in outcome.
https://t.me/med1917
156,157
After the manip-
ulation, the patient works on passive stretching exercises and
152
uses an extension orthosis at night for 3 months.
Side eects include skin breakage, tendon rupture, pulley and/or ligament damage, nerve injury, and allergic reaction.
153
Peimer et al
158
re­ported a 5-year recurrence rate of 47% after CCH injection, which is comparable to surgery.
Postoperative therapy usually involves edema control, wound care, tendon-gliding exercises to promote tendon excur­sion through the surgical site, AROM of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist, and scar management following suture removal and wound closure. Gentle PROM begins 3 to 4 weeks post-surgery once edema and inammation subside and there is no atten­uation of the extensor mechanism or PIP joint extension lag. ere is no consensus in the literature on the type of orthosis or duration of orthosis use following surgery, but it is the authors’ experience that patients wear either a volar or dorsal extension
153
orthosis up to 6 to 8 months. Sweet and Blackmore
provided postsurgical recommendations for patients with long-standing PIP joint exion contractures and attenuation of the extensor tendon at the PIP joint, which included using a PIP joint ex­tension orthosis for several weeks post-surgery and limiting composite sting during this time. e DIP joint can remain free during this time, and the patient performs active DIP joint exion to maintain the length of the oblique retinacular liga­ment. e patient gradually begins PIP joint exion and is able to progress the arc of motion if a PIP joint lag does not occur.
Evans et al
159
recommends a no-tension technique when
153
managing patients following fasciectomy, which is based on basic science literature describing the detrimental eects of ex­cessive mechanical stress that occur on a cellular level, which include capillary endothelial occlusion and tissue anoxia. In the no-tension approach, the patient avoids strenuous exercise, stretching, and orthoses that create excessive mechanical stress to the skin and healing tissues to minimize alterations in neuro­vascular function and tissue nutrition that may in turn facilitate
159
scar hypertrophy and increase edema and inammation.
De Quervain Tendinopathy
De Quervain tendinopathy is a tenovaginitis, or tendon entrapment. It causes impaired tendon gliding under a thick­ened retinaculum in the rst dorsal extensor tendon compart-
160
ment of the wrist (APL and EPB tendons).
ere are many anatomical variations in this region with the most common being an intercompartmental septum between the tendons of the APL and EPB, and another being the presence of multiple
160
tendon slips of either the APL (more common) or EPB.
De Quervain tendinopathy is a clinical diagnosis more common in women than men. It is especially common in the later stages of pregnancy and during lactation. Studies have shown inconsis­tent inammatory ndings that may relate to dierent stages of the disease.
160,161
A study by Shen et al
161
found levels of estrogen
receptor expression correlated to disease activity.
e clinical presentation includes complaints of pain in the rst dorsal compartment, tenderness upon palpation along the tendons’ course, and in some cases, tenderness 1 cm to 2 cm
78
proximal to the radial styloid.
Special tests for this condition include the Finkelstein and Eicho tests and resisted thumb ex­tension (described earlier); however, special tests alone lack suf­cient diagnostic accuracy. Clinicians rarely use imaging stud­ies; but, imaging may be necessary to rule out arthritic changes at the rst CMC and STT joints or, in cases of trauma, to rule
78
out distal radius or scaphoid fractures.
Dierential diagnoses
also include ruling-out irritation of the radial sensory nerve and
162
intersection syndrome.
Diagnostic ultrasound can be used to
identify anatomical variations.
163
Following a recent systematic review, Abi-Rafeh et al
rec­ommended a multi-modal treatment approach including both a corticosteroid injection and an orthosis. ese authors also concluded that an ultrasound-guided injection resulted in bet­ter outcomes likely due to the improved accuracy and ability to visualize the intercompartmental septum. Menendez et al
164
studied the eectiveness of 2 dierent orthosis protocols in pa­tients with De Quervain tendinopathy: wearing a thumb-spica orthosis full time compared to as-desired. Results showed no signicant dierences in pain, grip strength, DASH scores, or treatment satisfaction at the end of the intervention (nal fol­low-up mean ± standard deviation: 7.5 ± 3.3 weeks, range, 3.6 to 24 weeks).
Factors associated with poor outcomes for individuals un­dergoing nonsurgical management include the presence of met­abolic syndrome and hypothyroidism, use of growth hormone, a history of trigger nger or CTS, extensor tendon triggering, and presence of psychological factors including pain anxiety,
163
depressive symptoms, and catastrophizing.
Some individuals may require surgical intervention. Rehabilitation goals follow­ing surgery include full wrist and thumb ROM and tendon gliding, a mobile, non-painful scar, and full return to activity.
Trigger Finger
Trigger nger or trigger thumb, is a stenosing tendovag-
initis that includes snapping or locking of a nger or thumb
165
during exion, with or without pain.
It usually occurs in the palm at the level of the distal palmar crease, or MP joint, due to a size mismatch between a swollen exor tendon and a thick-
166
ened A1 pulley.
e tendon sheath extends more proximally than the pulley system and a palpable, tender nodule may de­velop at the proximal edge of the sheath. During nger exion, the exor tendon glides proximally, then as the patient tries to extend the nger, the tendon (or nodule) gets “stuck” on the proximal border of the pulley, momentarily preventing nger extension. In more severe cases, the patient reports the need to manually straighten the nger. Dierential diagnoses include DD, ganglia, lipomas, and other exor tendon masses, such as
167
tumors.
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
49
Uchihashi et al
https://t.me/med1917
166
described histopathological ndings in trigger ngers, identifying chondrocytoid cells that produce hyaluronic acid and a hypocellular collagen matrix in the teno­synovium. ese abnormal cellular changes result in hypertro­phy causing constriction in the bro-osseous A1 pulley. ese authors suggest that excess hyaluronic acid synthesis and an edematous collagen matrix are involved in the condition’s pro­gression. In their study, the incidence of those histopathological ndings was much greater than those that typically occur in tissue aected by synovitis.
Trigger ngers are usually idiopathic and occur much more frequently in women than men. e goal of treatment is to re­store a smooth, painless, full ROM in the aected ngers.
167
Nonoperative treatment includes ROM and tendon gliding
167
exercises, modalities, orthoses, or steroid injection,
although
there is no evidence to support nonsurgical interventions other
168
than orthoses and injection. Lunsford et al
concluded that an orthosis could be used when injection or surgical interven­tion were not viable options. ese authors concluded that the orthosis should be worn at all times for 6 to 12 weeks, and the decision to block, or immobilize, MP joint exion versus PIP joint exion should be determined by the therapist and patient preference.
According to a consensus study on the treatment of trigger
nger, one should determine treatment according to the severity
156
and duration of the patient’s symptoms.
In patients with ear­ly, mild symptoms (symptoms < 3 months and no snapping or locking), an orthosis that holds the MP joint in extension (MP blocking orthosis) is indicated.
As the duration and severity of the disease progresses, au-
thors of the consensus study recommend corticosteroid injec-
156
tion or corticosteroid injection plus orthosis use.
169
series showed 45%
and 69%
using corticosteroid injection. Wojahn et al
170
success rates with treatment
169
Two case
reported higher success in females presenting with their rst trigger nger. Fac­tors associated with success in their study included female sex and single rather than multiple nger involvement. In a review
167
of literature, Oh et al
reported the deleterious eects of cor­ticosteroid injections on subcutaneous fat atrophy, pain, skin depigmentation, transient elevation of urine and blood glucose levels, and tendon tensile strength. ese authors recommended avoiding physical activity and overload to the aected part for approximately 3 weeks following the injection to allow tendon healing to avoid tendon rupture.
Patients who fail nonsurgical management may progress to
surgery, which includes percutaneous or open release. Patients
patients will not need postoperative therapy following trigger nger release unless complications arise. e therapist then fo­cuses the treatment on complications that may include localized pain, swelling, and/or scarring; AROM loss; and joint stiness. e therapist may perform therapeutic ultrasound, gentle pain­free massage, scar compression, and dierential tendon gliding
exercises, while avoiding new signs and symptoms of inam­mation. e patient does not begin strengthening or resisted activities until 3 weeks post-surgery. Strengthening begins with submaximal, isometric activity in a pain-free position and pro­gresses gradually to avoid pain and tenosynovitis. Forceful com­posite sting should be delayed or minimized in patients prone
165
to triggering in multiple digits.
NERVE INJURIES
Peripheral nerves in the upper extremity consist of myelin­ated and unmyelinated axons that project from the nerve cell bodies. A connective tissue sheath, known as the endoneurium, surrounds the axon as it travels from the nerve cell body to its target organ. e endoneurium is comprised of broblasts (re­sponsible for collagen synthesis), capillaries, and lymphatics.
171
e perineurium, another connective tissue layer, holds togeth-
172
er a bundle of axons.
is bundle of axons is known as a
fascicle. e perineurium, along with the endoneurium, form
172
the blood-nerve barrier.
e perineurium also provides tensile strength and regulates diusion into the fascicles. e epineu­rium, a thick connective tissue layer holds together groups of fascicles. It provides additional protection and cushioning, as
171
well as a nutrient-rich blood supply.
e epineurium is thick-
er where the nerve crosses joints, likely for additional protec-
171
e number of fascicles in an individual nerve can vary
tion. from 1 to 3 in small sensory nerves to 200 in large nerves.
172
Classication of Nerve Injuries
173
Seddon
form of nerve injury and generally carries a good prognosis.
outlined 3 types of nerve injury: neurapraxia,
174
It
is characterized by a transient reduction, or complete blocking
173
of nerve conduction at the lesion site,
from etiologies such as compression or repetitive strain. In neurapraxic injuries, axon continuity remains intact, but there is disruption in neural
175
circulation with formation of endoneurial edema.
Resulting
ischemia metabolically blocks conduction by interrupting the
176,177
energy source required for axonal transport.
Clinically, it
results in sensory dysfunction, the Tinel sign is not present, and
172
electrophysiologic studies are negative. ing compression can result in brosis within the epineurium.
However, long-stand-
175
In neurapraxic injuries, recovery begins immediately following removal of the compression, recovery is complete, and occurs between hours to 3 months after removal of compression.
Axonotmesis is a more severe type of nerve injury. In these injuries, there is axonal damage but the surrounding connec­tive tissue structures (ie, perineurium and epineurium) are
172,178
preserved. the injury, causing complete denervation.
Axon and myelin degeneration occur distal to
178
e potential for recovery is good in axonotmetic injuries because the uninjured nerve latticework provides a path for subsequent sprouting ax-
178
ons to reinnervate their target organ.
In axonotmetic inju-
ries, there is sensory and/or motor dysfunction and the Tinel
50
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
sign is positive at the site of the injury.
https://t.me/med1917
172
Electrophysiologic
studies reveal decreased nerve conduction and regional muscle
178
denervation with fasciculations. immediately in axonometic injuries.
Regeneration occurs almost
179
In neurotmesis, the most severe type of nerve injury, such as a laceration, there is complete disruption to the nerve. In these injuries, there is complete functional loss. Also, there is no potential for recovery without surgical intervention due to scar formation and loss of the endoneural tube that would otherwise
178
properly direct axonal regrowth.
Following nerve laceration,
the distal aspect of the nerve disintegrates, Schwann cells lose
180
their myelin sheath, and some Schwann cells die.
Interesting-
ly, sensory neurons show greater cell death than motor neurons
180
over time if not repaired.
As many as 20% to 50% of neurons in the dorsal root ganglia may also die following an injury to a sensory nerve.
176
Nerve Repair and Regeneration
Nerve repair can include a direct, or end-to-end repair, or in cases where the gap between the ends of the nerve is signif­icant, surgeons may use nerve conduits or tubes that serve as a tunnel to bridge nerve ends, and nerve grafting. Axonal regener­ation and remyelination begins as early as 2 to 3 weeks after re-
179
e smallest diameter bers tend to be the rst to show
pair. return, thus making pain one of the rst senses to reappear fol­lowing injury or repair, while the large diameter bers that carry vibration, proprioception, and motor function tend to be the last to recover.
179
Dellon et al
181
proposed the following order of sensory recovery: (1) pain measured via pin prick, (2) 30-cycle per second vibration, (3) moving touch and moving 2PD, (4) constant touch and static 2PD, and (5) 256-cycle per second vi-
182
bration. Although, Waylett-Rendall
found that some patients
have return of 30-cycle per second vibration prior to pain.
e widely understood rate for axonal regrowth is about 1
183
mm per day.
Outcomes following nerve injury vary among patients. e literature provides signicant factors inuencing recovery. ese include (1) age (children under 10 years have superior outcomes); (2) verbal and visio-spatial learning capac­ity; (3) timing (earlier repair is associated with less cell death, scarring, and Schwann cell atrophy and facilitates easier blood vessel visualization during surgery); (4) pure motor or sensory nerve injury (unlike mixed nerve repairs, there is no chance of a mismatch between bers); (5) level of injury (distal injuries only have to travel short distances to reach their target tissue); and (6) type of injury (a clean, sharp laceration with minimal to no
184
loss of tissue has improved chances at recovery).
Early surgical repair and pharmacological agents can help decrease neuronal cell death and help in achieving a reasonable outcome, although in adults, there will be some permanent
180
dysfunction.
Researchers speculate that cortical and subcor­tical (thalamus and brain stem) reorganization occurs almost immediately after transection injuries and may be a factor in
185
the suboptimal recovery of these injuries.
For example, after
a median nerve injury, there is a silent black hole in the so­matosensory brain cortex that corresponds to the median nerve
184
distribution.
Soon, adjacent areas of the brain take over and
previously inhibited areas of the brain are unmasked to compen-
184
Another deterrent to complete recovery is misdirection
sate. of axons to the incorrect target tissue. As healing progresses, a new axon may innervate a dierent area of the skin or a motor nerve may innervate a sensory area, and vice versa. Clinical­ly, patients complain of problems with touch localization. is misdirection produces additional changes in the cortex, further complicating recovery.
184
Clinical Presentation of Traumatic Nerve Injuries
Median nerve
Traumatic median nerve injuries are usually open injuries. ere is a usual pattern of sensory decit potentially involving the volar aspect of the thumb and index, long, and radial half of the ring ngers. Motor loss in traumatic median nerve injuries is more extensive when the injury is in the proximal forearm compared to the distal forearm. Motor loss in proximal medi­an nerve injuries can include the pronator teres, FCR, palmaris longus, FPL, and FDP (index and long) muscles, and the hand muscles including the lumbrical muscles I and II, FPB (super­cial head), APB, and OP muscles. Distal injuries will preserve function of the forearm, wrist exor, and extrinsic nger exor muscles, but there will be weakness of opposition and pinch due to involvement of the median-innervated thenar muscles.
186
Loss of thenar musculature results in an ape hand deformity, ie, loss of thumb opposition causes the thumb to rest in the plane of the palm. is deformity impairs ne motor function, including writing, prehension, ne motor manipulation, dex­terity, coordination between the thumb and index nger, and stereognosis (also known as tactile gnosis or object identica­tion by touch).
Ulnar nerve
Traumatic ulnar nerve injuries in the proximal forearm (high injuries) and wrist or hand (low injuries) usually result from lacerations, fractures, or dislocations, and suicide at­tempts. Injuries to the ulnar nerve may occur along with inju­ries to muscles, tendons, or arteries that complicate the patient’s prognosis and rehabilitation. High injuries result in sensory loss in the volar and dorsal surfaces of the small and ring (ulnar half) ngers. Motor loss occurs in the FCU, FDP (ring and small ngers), hypothenar, dorsal and palmar interossei, lumbricals to the ring and small ngers, AP, and FPB (deep head) muscles.
187
Lower injuries spare sensation on the dorsal-ulnar aspect of the hand due to branching of the dorsal branch of the ul­nar nerve in the forearm. In low lesions, the sensory and motor patterns are dependent on the specic location of the injury with relation to the ulnar tunnel. Lesions proximal to the ul­nar tunnel will result in sensory loss in the ulnar aspect of the hand (volar only) and motor loss in the hand similar to high
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
51
lesions (excluding the FCU and FDP muscles). Lesions distal
https://t.me/med1917
to the bifurcation of the ulnar nerve into its deep and super­cial branches will have dierent clinical manifestations. Patients with injuries to the deep branch will have normal sensation but lose motor function of the ulnar-innervated hand intrinsic mus­cles. Lesions to the deep branch that occur distal to the abduc­tor digiti minimi branch will aect the interossei but spare the hypothenar muscles. Injuries to the supercial branch of the ul­nar nerve result mostly in sensory loss to the volar-ulnar aspect of the hand. Motor loss includes the palmaris brevis, but this is rarely noticeable to the patient and dicult to detect upon a clinical examination.
188
Patients with ulnar nerve injuries are at risk for developing a claw-hand (intrinsic minus) deformity in the ulnar ngers. Loss of the muscles of the hypothenar eminence leaves the ED muscle unopposed at the MP joints, resulting in excessive MP joint extension. Loss of intrinsic muscle contribution to PIP joint extension allows the FDS and FDP muscles to overpower the ED muscle, resulting in excessive PIP joint exion. A pa­tient with clawing has diculty grasping around objects with the ulnar aspect of the hand. Patients also lack the ability to key pinch and have a positive Froment sign, in which they attempt to substitute for loss of the thumb adductor by activating the FPL muscle (innervated by the AIN) that produces thumb IP joint exion (Figure 17). ere is also atrophy in the thumb web space.
Radial nerve
Traumatic injuries to the radial nerve in the proximal arm are often associated with a humeral shaft fracture or el­bow dislocation. Lesions proximal to the radial head will aect the anconeus, brachioradialis, as well as all the wrist, thumb, and nger extensors. ese proximal lesions produce a classic wrist drop deformity due to loss of the wrist and thumb ex­tensors. Also, there will be sensory loss in the radial side of the hand including the dorsal aspect of the thumb and index and long ngers. Lesions distal to the bifurcation of the radial nerve into the PIN and supercial sensory branches produce isolated motor loss (PIN injuries) or isolated sensory loss (supercial sensory branch injuries), respectively. Individuals with injuries to the PIN will be able to extend the wrist with a radial devi­ation bias due to branching to the ECRL muscle proximal to the bifurcation of the PIN and supercial sensory branch. Oth­erwise, motor examination of the PIN-innervated muscles in proximal-to-distal order is important to determine the location of the injury. Lesions to the supercial sensory branch have little functional consequences.
Management of Traumatic Nerve Injuries
More severe traumatic nerve injuries require surgical man­agement, if only for purposes of exploration and neurolysis, and if explored early (within 5-7 days) most sharp lacerations can
186
be primarily repaired.
When primary repair is not an option,
gaps can be bridged using allografts, conduits, or grafts. A ther­apist must have a good understanding of the surgical repair to individualize a rehabilitation protocol for a patient.
e position of immobilization after surgery is determined by a variety of factors that include location and type of repair (ie, primary, conduit, etc.). Also, immobilization should prevent both over stretching of the denervated muscle-tendon units and
179
typical deformity that result from nerve injury.
e early re-
habilitation should focus on edema control through elevation
179
and active movement of noninvolved joints.
e use of ice is controversial at or distal to the repair because it slows nerve conduction and may harm insensate tissues. It is imperative for the therapist to educate the patient throughout rehabilitation to prevent injuries, such as burns, to the ngers because of sensory loss.
Once the surgeon removes the postoperative dressings and clears the patient for activity, AROM and PROM may begin, including place-and-hold activities. In place-hold exercises, the therapist passively places the limb or ngers in the desired po­sition based on the nerve repaired and asks the patient to hold the position using their own muscle contraction. If needed, the therapist provides assistance with the hold phase. e therapist also initiates gentle wrist, nger, and thumb ROM in a protect­ed range with gravity eliminated and progresses to full range
179
against gravity.
Care must be taken not to place excess tension on the nerve during this phase when regaining active motion. It is important for the therapist to instruct the patient in main­taining PROM of all aected joints to minimize stiness and avoid joint contractures, because, while awaiting motor recov­ery, patients will tend to develop stiness and contractures in typical patterns depending on the nerve repaired. Surgeons may choose to use an orthosis for optimal positioning to minimize contractures and preserve function while awaiting return of in­nervation.
Following median nerve injuries, the patient will tend
to develop a thumb adduction contracture or stiness in the
179
thumb web space. Du et al
recommended use of a resting hand orthosis with a thumb component or forearm-based op­ponens (thumb spica) orthosis to support the thumb in oppo­sition. e patient may also use a static, hand-based opponens orthosis during the day to position the thumb, facilitate pre-
179
hension, and allow some use of the ngers.
With ulnar nerve injuries, the patient uses a dorsal MP joint blocking orthosis that positions the ring and small nger MP joints in exion to minimize the claw-hand deformity. is orthosis helps prevent MP joint extension stiness and redistributes ED muscle force to the IP joints to minimize IP joints exion stiness (Figure
179
In radial nerve injuries, the patient uses a palmar resting
24). orthosis to support the ngers and wrist in extension.
When motor function begins to return, the therapist in­structs the patient in specic exercises as well as functional ac­tivities for the involved muscles. Sensory reeducation and dex­terity training are important components of the rehabilitation
52
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Figure 24.
https://t.me/med1917
Hand-based Anti-claw Orthosis (Ulnar
Gutter Orthosis)
program. e use of alternating current electrical stimulation should be considered as an adjunct to sensory and motor reed­ucation.
179
Sensory Reeducation
Rosen et al
189
described sensory reeducation, or relearning, as a process required for decoding and adapting to new and distorted aerent sensory input. ey have divided sensory re­education into 2 phases. Phase 1 occurs immediately after re­pair when the patient has no protective sensation.
189
e goal of phase 1 is to maintain the cortical hand map in the brain. Activities in this phase include motor and sensory imagery. e therapist can also instruct the patient in mirror therapy, where the patient hides the involved hand behind a mirror and some­one touches the uninjured hand. e patient, looking in the mirror sees touch as if it were happening to the injured hand (Figure 25).
Phase 2 begins when the axons have reached the hand or when the patient can feel, at minimum, the 6.65 (300 g) mono­lament in the palm and when touch localization is present.
189
In this phase, patients perform shape, texture, and object iden­tication activities.
189
Beginning sensory reeducation too early
can lead to failure and cause frustration for the therapist and pa-
190
tient.
Because pain is the rst sensation to recover following nerve injury or repair, many patients will develop hyperesthesia, or allodynia. In these cases, a desensitization program should precede sensory reeducation.
189
e therapist accomplishes this
by instructing the patient to expose the hypersensitive area to a
Figure 25.
Mirror erapy*
e patient is seated perpendicular to a mirror. e involved hand is hidden behind the mirror. e patient performs activities with both hands while watching the uninvolved hand in the mirror, which appears as if it were the involved hand.
*Reprinted with permission from Wadsworth C, Barch E, Erick­son M. e Wrist and Hand: Physical erapy Patient Manage­ment Utilizing Current Evidence: Home Study Course 21.2.4. La Crosse, WI: Orthopaedic Section, APTA Inc; 2011.
variety of textures, beginning with soft cotton and progressing to more coarse textures. Additional interventions for hypersen­sitivity include compression, percussion, vibration (low to high cycle), and dowel textures (moving stimulus), moving the hand through particle bins (static stimulus), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasound.
191
Compression Neuropathies
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compression neuropathy. Incidence, prevalence, and risk factors have been reported in the 2019 Clinical Practice Guideline of the Acad­emy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy.
192
With CTS, patients complain of pain, numbness, and tingling in part or all the median nerve distribution, which includes the volar aspect of the thumb and index, long, and radial half of the ring ngers. Sensation of the skin around the scaphoid tubercle is normal because the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve in­nervates this area.
Management of CTS begins with making an accurate di­agnosis, which includes ruling out conditions that mimic CTS, such as cervical radiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, dia­betic neuropathy, demyelinating disorders, and pronator teres syndrome (where the median nerve becomes entrapped be­tween the 2 heads of the pronator teres muscle). e examina-
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
53
tion should include a medical screening and history, risk factor
https://t.me/med1917
and symptom assessment, and self-report measures such as the
192
Katz hand diagram, CTQ-SSS, CTQ-FS, or DASH.
Authors of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of CTS reported 98% sensitivity and 54% specicity for diagnosing CTS if 3 of the following are present: shaking hands provides relief, wrist ratio (anterior-posterior width/medial-lateral width) greater than 0.67, CTQ-SSS score greater than 1.9, decreased thumb
193
sensation, and age greater than 45 years.
e best likelihood
ratio (4.60) came when 4 of the 5 items were present, or pos-
193
is clinical prediction rule requires further validation
itive. in additional samples. Clinicians should also combine ndings from multiple special tests including the carpal compression and Phalen tests and the Tinel sign.
192
If the clinical examination shows ndings consistent with CTS, a clinician should assess the severity of nerve compres­sion. is is done through assessing for presence of a Tinel sign,
192
sensory threshold testing, and 2PD testing.
e Tinel sign is important when assessing severity because it is a sign of axo­nal regeneration that appears in the later stages of compression. Baseline grip and pinch strength and dexterity testing could be done to assess functional implications of nerve compression. Electrodiagnostic studies, such as electromyography or nerve conduction studies, can be useful in conrming the diagnosis of CTS and in grading its severity when the clinical examination is inconclusive. However, there are some individuals who have surgically relieved median nerve compression but show normal electrodiagnostic studies prior to surgery.
194,195
Nonsurgical management of CTS begins with the use of a
thosis), with increasing dosage as needed to include full-time wear. One may also consider extending the orthosis distally to
192
immobilize the MP joints in a neutral position,
especially in the absence of electrodiagnostic studies. Classications based on clinical signs and symptoms alone or combined with elec­trodiagnostic studies are largely based on anecdotal evidence, expert consensus, or the pathophysiology of nerve compression and lack independent validation. According to evidence pre­sented, the frequency of symptoms (mild demonstrating more intermittent symptoms and moderate demonstrating more con­stant symptoms) immobilizing the MP joints prevents lumbri­cal muscle moving proximally into the carpal tunnel (lumbrical incursion) where they compromise space. Weaker evidence ex­ists for interventions such as supercial heat, interferential cur­rent, phonophoresis, manual therapy, and lumbrical or general stretching.
192
is monograph’s authors agree that patient education, including activity modication during ADLs, work activities, and recreational activities, are other important components of nonsurgical management. Computer workstations and hand tools should position the wrists as close to neutral as possible, and the patient should attempt to avoid prolonged palm and volar wrist pressure, vibration, and cold exposure. Other pro-
longed positions to avoid include a tight full (composite) st and the intrinsic plus positions. Patients should be advised to use large handle grips and padded work gloves. Patients should avoid forceful gripping (especially combined with wrist exion or extension) and loading the nger exors with the wrist in a neutral, exed, or extended position and pinching because these positions increase intraneural pressure.
Clinicians managing patients nonoperatively for CTS should realize the detrimental eects of prolonged nerve com­pression including the potential for permanent loss of sensa­tion and motor function. In a systematic review, Shi et al
196
showed that benets of nonsurgical management plateau after 3 months, while the clinical benets of surgery continue for at least 12 months. Surgical outcomes often surpass those seen with nonsurgical care on symptom, function, and electrophys­iologic measures.
196
According to Boyd et al,
197
the CTQ-SSS, an 11-item self-report questionnaire, is the best predictor of failed nonsurgical management. Other authors have shown that CTQ-SSS scores of 2.5 or less are 89% specic for a positive
198
response to nonsurgical management.
Individuals with severe symptoms or who fail to respond to nonsurgical management may progress to surgery. For those un­dergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR), early mobilization is rec-
199
ommended.
ere is no evidence to support the routine use of therapy following CTR. It should be reserved for those who demonstrate complications, including but not limited to scar
200
hypersensitivity, ROM decits, or prolonged pain.
Patient education described previously for nonsurgical management continues to be important after surgery. After suture removal, 2 weeks post-surgery, the patient can begin scar mobilization. Repetitive gripping and pinching as well as strengthening with putty or hand grippers is not recommended at this point be­cause these activities can contribute to inammation in the ex-
201
or sheath, the A1 pulleys, and the thumb.
Return to work
depends on hand involved and handedness, patient occupation,
199
and the availability of return to work.
Results show favorable outcomes in the majority of pa-
202,203
tients following CTR.
In a recent prospective cohort study, results showed symptom duration and electrophysiological se­verity were signicant predictors of change score in the CTQ­SSS, while age was the only predictor of change in the CTQ­FS. Preoperative grip strength was the only predictor of patient
203
satisfaction following CTR.
In another study, authors found
that higher preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scores (>30) neg-
202
atively inuenced patient satisfaction.
Ulnar nerve
Ulnar tunnel syndrome (UTS), or compression of the ul­nar nerve at the wrist, occurs near the ulnar tunnel, or Guyon canal. It is generally accepted that the incidence is less than both
188
CTS and cubital tunnel syndrome at the elbow.
Common causes of UTS include ganglia; anatomical abnormalities such as anomalous muscles, brous bands or ligaments; fractures of
54
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.