Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4366_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
101 Мб
Скачать
Chapter  Structural Graing of the Nasal Tip 435
https://t.me/medicina_free
An extracorporeal septoplasty was performed and a septal-L strut was recon­structed from the septal cartilage. It was secured to the anterior nasal spine cau­dally and to the nasal bones and upper lateral cartilage remnants cephalically. e missing right middle crura was reconstructed with a septal cartilage gra. A columellar strut gra was used to stabilize the medial crura. Bilateral alar contour gras were placed to reinforce the alar rims. A diced cartilage−fascia gra was placed to augment the dorsum and camouage the dorsal irregularities.
Part Four e Tip436
https://t.me/medicina_free
e patient is shown  years postoperatively. Tip asymmetry and the hanging columella have been corrected, and a straight septum was achieved, with func­tional improvement. e nasal dorsum was augmented and the dorsum is straight and smooth.
Chapter  Structural Graing of the Nasal Tip 437
https://t.me/medicina_free
COMPLICATIONS
Tip asymmetries can occur as a result of uneven placement of structural gras. e surgeon must exercise care in placing the gras symmetrically.
If a columellar strut gra is placed directly against the premaxilla, displacement from the midline can be seen postoperatively. If the columellar strut gra over­laps the caudal septum, shiing from the midline can be seen. If a so tissue pad is not protected between the columellar strut gra and the anterior nasal spine, the patient can experience a clicking sensation while smiling.
Caudal septal extension gras can cause deviation of the nasal tip if stabilized in an overlapping fashion to the caudal septum. To avoid this, the caudal septal gra is aligned end to end with the existing caudal septum using splinting gras.
Lateral crural strut gras may displace the vestibular skin medially and compro­mise the airway if they are not extended to the piriform aperture. Lateral crural strut gras prepared from rib cartilage must be thinned enough to avoid this problem. If structural gras for lower lateral cartilage reconstruction are thick, the thickness of the gras may create bulk around the tip. is is particularly true for gras prepared from rib cartilage.
CONCLUSION
A stable, well-structured nasal tip is essential for functional and aesthetic pur­poses. Short and weak medial crura usually present with an underprojected tip. e columellar strut gra is an eective and commonly used method for strengthening the medial crura and improving the tip support. If an increase of tip projection is needed, the medial crura can be advanced on a long and strong columellar strut gra or caudal septal extension gra. For a further increase in tip projection and for improvement of tip contour, shield-shaped or onlay tip gras can be used.
Asymmetries and congenital malformations of the lower lateral cartilages can be corrected with the use of a variety of structural gras. Lateral crural strut gras are versatile tools in correcting curvature deformities of lateral crura, malposi­tion of the lateral crura, and reinforcement of weak lateral crura.
In secondary rhinoplasty, reconstruction of the nasal framework to produce an aesthetic and functional improvement should be the goal. A variety of structural gras may be required to achieve these goals. Anatomic reconstruction of weak-
Part Four e Tip438
https://t.me/medicina_free
ened or interrupted lower lateral cartilages and reconstitution of a stable nasal tip tripod must be performed for a predictable outcome. e newly reconstructed cartilaginous framework should be strong enough to withstand the even greater forces of scar contraction during the healing period.
KEY POINTS
e lower third of the nose has a tripod-like support structure that is made up of the conjoined medial crura and lateral crural complex based bilaterally on the piriform aperture. Reconstructing a stable tripod structure supports the nasal tip, strengthens the alar sidewalls, and provides an aesthetically pleasing nasal tip.
Preserving or reconstituting the structural nasal framework is essential for consistent and successful long-term results.
e open rhinoplasty approach provides better visualization without distortion of cartilages, leading to accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Autologous cartilage graing is the preferred treatment, if structural graing of the tip cartilages is considered. If available, septal cartilage is the gra of choice for autologous cartilage graing.
If signicant support is required, autologous rib cartilage is the gra of choice. Long, straight struts can be prepared from rib cartilage for reinforcement or reconstruction of the lateral crural complex.
Lateral crural strut gras are indicated for correction of concave lateral crura, a boxy tip, cephalic malposition of the lateral crura, alar rim retraction, and strengthening of weak lateral crura.
In secondary cases, anatomic reconstruction of the weakened or interrupted lower lateral cartilages and reconstitution of a stable nasal tip tripod must be performed for a predictable outcome.
In secondary cases with an overresected nasal skeleton, tip projection is usually lost and has to be reestablished. Tip projection can be achieved with a columel­lar strut gra, caudal septal extension gra, or tip gras.
e columellar strut gra is a very useful tool for stabilizing the columellar base and correcting medial crural deformities. A long and strong columellar strut gra can be used to increase tip projection by advancing medial crura on it.
Tip gras can be used to increase tip projection and improve tip contour. In secondary cases, shield-shaped tip gras are preferred to achieve tip denition and hide tip asymmetries. e sharp edges of the cartilage can be camouaged using fascia or perichondrial gras.
e lateral crural gra is a versatile tool for reshaping, repositioning, or replac­ing the missing segments of the lateral crura and domes.
Long lateral crural gras can be prepared from rib cartilage and thinned, al lowing the gra to bend and be used to reconstruct the missing domes and the lateral crura.
-
Chapter  Structural Graing of the Nasal Tip 439
https://t.me/medicina_free
REFERENCES
1. Anderson JR. A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol :-, .
2. Janeke JB, Wright WK. Studies on the support of nasal tip. Arch Otolaryngol :-, .
3. McCollough EG, Mangat D. Systematic approach to correction of nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol :-, .
4. Adams WP Jr, Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, et al. Anatomic bases and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus closed rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discussion -, .
5. Sheen JH. Spreader gra: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg :-, .
6. Toriumi DM. Management of the middle nasal vault in rhinoplasty. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg :-, .
7. Rohrich RJ, Potter JK, Landecker A. Preoperative concepts for rhinoplasty. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, .
8. Gunter JP, Freidman RM. Lateral crural strut gra: technique and clinical applications in rhino­plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discussion -, .
9. Toriumi DM. Structure approach in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am :-, .
10. DeRosa J, Watson D, Toriumi DM. Structural graing in secondary rhinoplasty. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Qual­ity Medical Publishing, .
11. Gunter JP, Cochran CS. e tripod concept for correcting severely deformed nasal tip cartilages. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, .
12. Rohrich RJ, Raniere J Jr, Ha RY. Alar contour gra: Correction and prevention of alar rim deformi­ties in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discussion -, .
13. Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Raniere J Jr. Correction of alar rim deformities: alar contour gras. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, .
14. Cerkes N. Concurrent elevation of upper lateral cartilage perichondrium and nasal bone perios­teum: the perichondro-periosteal ap. Aesthetic Surg J :-, .
15. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Hackney FL. Open approach in secondary rhinoplasty. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, .
16. McCollough EG, Fedok FC. e lateral crural turnover gra: correction of the concave lateral crus. Laryngoscope :-, .
17. Apaydin F. Lateral crural turn-in ap in functional rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg :-, .
18. Gunter JP, Freidman RM, Hackney FL. Correction of alar rim deformities: lateral crural strut gras. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, .
19. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr. e boxy nasal tip: classication and management based on alar carti­lage suturing techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discussion -, .
20. Gruber RP, Freidman GD. Suture algorithm for broad or bulbous nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discussion -, .
21. Gruber RP, Nahai F, Bogdan MA, et al. Changing the convexity and concavity of nasal cartilages and cartilage gras with horizontal mattress sutures. Part II: Clinical results. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discussion -, .
22. Sheen JH. Malposition of the alar cartilages. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Los Angeles, May .
23. Petro MA, McCollough EG, Hom D, et al. Nasal tip projection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg :-, .
Part Four e Tip440
https://t.me/medicina_free
24. Gunter JP, Clark CP, Freidman RM. Internal stabilization of autologous rib cartilage gras in rhi­noplasty: a barrier to cartilage warping. Plast Reconstr Surg :-, .
25. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, Deuber MA. Graduated approach to tip renement and projection. In Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, .
26. Kridel RW, Konior RJ, Shumrick KA, et al. Advances in nasal tip surgery: the lateral crural steal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg :-, .
27. Foda H, Kridel RW. Lateral crural steal and lateral crural overlay: an objective evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg :-, .
28. Gibson T, Davis WB. e distortion of autogenous cartilage gras: its causes and prevention. Br J Plas Surg :-, .
29. Sheen JH. Achieving more nasal tip projection by the use of a small autogenous vomer or septal cartilage gra. A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg :-, .
30. Byrd S, Andodochick S, Copit S, et al. Septal extension gras: a method of controlling tip projec­tion, rotation and shape. Plast Reconstr Surg :-, .
31. Cerkes N. e crooked nose: principles of treatment. Aesthetic Surg J :-, .
32. Guyuron B, Poggi JT, Michelow BJ. e subdomal gra. Plast Reconstr Surg :-; discus sion -, .
-
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
https://t.me/medicina_free
21
A Predictable and Algorithmic Approach
to Tip Renement and Projection
Rod J. Rohrich  Jerey E. Janis  Ashkan Ghavami  Jamil Ahmad
Attaining a well-dened and properly projecting nasal tip is vital to success in
rhinoplasty. A thorough understanding of the anatomic structures that provide nasal tip support and their inuences on tip projection and shape is critical for the proper diagnosis and treatment of intricate nasal tip deformities.
-
e following factors help to determine tip projection
Length and strength of the lower lateral cartilages
Length and stability of the medial crura and middle crura
Suspensory ligament that spans the crura over the anterior septal angle of the upper and lower lateral cartilages
Fibrous connections between the upper and lower lateral cartilages
Abutment with the piriform aperture
Anterior septal angle
Skin and so tissue thickness and availability
e length, strength, shape, and position of the lower lateral cartilages as well as the brous/ligamentous attachments between these paired structures play a cen­tral role in supporting the nasal tip. nasal base, and piriform aperture provide additional stability and support to the nasal tip through their so tissue attachments.
-
e upper lateral cartilages, nasal septum,
-
:
441
Part Four e Tip442
https://t.me/medicina_free
Ultimately, tip projection and denition are determined by the dynamic inter­play between the aforementioned tip-supporting structures and the overlying skin and so tissue envelope. Since the relative contribution of each structure in tip projection varies from one patient to another, all tip-supporting components should be critically assessed and the treatment plan individualized.
Preoperatively, an underprojecting nasal tip may be diagnosed as the primary nasal deformity or may accompany other nasofacial imbalances. Iatrogenic loss of tip support may result from purposeful or unintended violation of critical tip-supporting structures.
,
Maneuvers such as cephalic trim of the lower lat­eral cartilages, caudal septal resection, dorsal reduction, transxion incisions, and alar base resections aect tip support and can cause a substantial reduction in tip projection. projection through disruption of skin and so tissue supports.
,,
e open approach can also lead to a small reduction in tip

Over the past two decades, conventional destructive and irreversible tip modi­cation techniques such as cartilaginous resection, transection, morselization, and scoring have been replaced by nondestructive, reversible, incremental, and dy­namic tip-suturing techniques.* e popularity of visible/palpable cartilage gras placed in a subcutaneous pocket underneath nasal skin has declined in recent years in favor of invisible/nonpalpable gras placed within or underneath the cartilaginous framework.
PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING
Accurate diagnosis of the nasal deformity and understanding the patient’s ex­pectations are the initial essential steps to a successful outcome. Patients may desire simple tip renement but may not understand the dynamic relationships between the upper, middle, and lower nasal thirds and the resultant eects of these relationships on overall nasal shape and balance. erefore patient edu cation plays an important role. Performing a comprehensive nasofacial analysis will allow the detection of both prominent and subtle factors that contribute to the nasal tip deformity and will assist the surgeon in developing a treatment plan directed at each specic component. In addition, meticulous surgical technique, frequent intraoperative reassessment, and proper postoperative management all contribute to a successful outcome.
*References , , , , -.References , , , , , .
-
Chapter  A Predictable and Algorithmic Approach to Tip Renement and Projection 443
https://t.me/medicina_free
Natural horizontal
facial plane
Comprehensive nasofacial analysis should include evaluation of the lip-chin com­plex. Byrd and Hobar suggested establishing a nose-lip-chin plane (NLCP), with ideal chin projection (in females) dened as mm posterior to a plumb line drawn perpendicular to the natural horizontal Frankfort plane. e appearance of ideal tip projection depends on this relationship, because an underprojected chin will make the nasal tip seem overprojected, and vice versa.

e appearance of ideal tip projection is dependent on the relationship of the nose-lip-chin complex, because an underprojected chin will make the nasal tip seem overprojected, and vice versa.
e thickness and sebaceous character of the nasal skin should also be evalu­ated. Males and certain ethnic subgroups such as those of black, Mediterranean, Hispanic, and Middle Eastern descent tend to have thicker, more sebaceous
-
skin.
e thicker skin envelope may camouage the results of tip modica­tion, so more aggressive maneuvers in these patients may be necessary to achieve the desired result.
-
However, the need for more aggressive techniques to obtain an increase in tip projection, denition, or nasal length must be balanced with the limitations of stretching the skin envelope, because an iatrogenic tension tip may be produced that can lead to vascular compromise and skin loss in severe cases.

In a patient with thick, sebaceous skin, alterations to the cartilaginous frame­work may need to be more aggressive to produce adequate tip denition and projection.
Part Four e Tip444
https://t.me/medicina_free
Next, attention is turned toward proportional nasal analysis, which has been thoroughly described previously. and basal views.
,
e presence of domal asymmetry, tip morphology (boxy or
,
Tip denition is best assessed on the frontal
bulbous tip), the degree of nostril show, columellar excess, caudal septal devia­tion, and a hanging (static) or hyperdynamic (animated) tip are noted. Animated views should be obtained to diagnose depressor septi nasi muscle hyperactivity resulting in hyperdynamic tip ptosis.

Tip projection is best assessed on the lat­eral view; it is evaluated by determining the proportion of the tip that lies anterior to a vertical line drawn adjacent to the most pro­jecting part of the upper lip. Fiy percent
A
B
to % of the tip should lie anterior to this vertical line. If less than % of the tip proj­ects anterior to this reference line, the tip is
A 50%-60%
of AB
underprojected.
1. 0
Adequate tip projection is dened as the presence of 50% to 60% of the tip lying anterior to the most projecting point of the upper lip.
0.67
Tip projection can also be measured as . times the ideal nasal length.
