Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4366_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
101 Мб
Скачать
Chapter  Dorsal Augmentation: Temporal Fascia–Wrapped Diced Cartilage 315
https://t.me/medicina_free
did Iswitch from the syringe injection technique to the construct technique?” e injection technique works surprisingly well when a uniform gra is required to create a straight prole, and the patient has a tight skin envelope. However, it does not work well in most secondary cases, in which the dorsal defect is more distal and a tapered augmentation is needed. Based on experience and unsatisfactory results, Ino longer inject gra in situ and strongly favor building a construct on the back table.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
Aer completion of the operation, all incisions are closed and the dorsum is gen­tly taped with Steri-Strips. Iprefer to use a Denver splint rather than an acrylic splint. e foam is positioned along the dorsum, and the previously bent splint is gently placed on top. e pressure from the splint further ensures a smooth dorsum. When the cast is removed days postoperatively, the nose is inspected and gentle molding can be carried out as needed. If required, the patient is seen every days for gra molding for up to days. Patients are informed not to wear sunglasses for weeks. If asymmetry is present year postoperatively, it can be easily shaped by beveling with a  blade. Alternatively, the now-solid gra can be removed, shaped, and reinserted.
COMPLICATIONS
Aer a decade of experience with DC-F gras, Ihave seen no evidence of ab­sorption and no warping. To date, the problems with diced cartilage gras have been more technical rather than intrinsic to the gra itself. A correlate from tra­ditional rhinoplasty surgery is the visibility of the cephalic end of a spreader gra, which is not the fault of the gra. My problems with diced cartilage gras have been relatively minor and easily corrected. ey include visibility of DC-F gras placed in the radix area, especially in patients with very active eyebrow elevation (more than mm). It is easily corrected under local anesthesia either by reduc­tion with a pituitary rongeur or excision and replacement with fascia alone. For dorsal gras, edge show occasionally occurs in the rhinion area, whereas caudally, inadequate graing of the supratip region is sometimes seen. e former is prob­ably caused by poor technique and the very thin skin in the rhinion area. It is easily corrected under local anesthesia in the oce using a pituitary rongeur. In one patient, who had a very thin skin envelope, Iplaced a layer of fascia between the skin and the intact DC-F gra in a revision. In the rhinion area of the gra, a greater prominence than desired can be present. is can be prevented by mak­ing a very tapered construct with minimal ll at the midpoint and laying the gra into the defect rather than stung it in and molding it. Occasionally a minor depression develops in the supratip area, the result of an initial undercorrection in an attempt to create an immediate supratip break. Over time, Ihave learned
Part ree e Dorsum316
https://t.me/medicina_free
to maintain the full gra length and not shorten it to achieve tip seto. If a de­pression occurs, Icorrect it with a small fascia gra; other surgeons might prefer AlloDerm. Also, Iam now more compulsive about checking for gra widening in the supratip area. is can occur aer manual molding of the gra, which forces cartilage from cephalad to caudal. us far patients have not complained about it. is experience is in marked contrast to more rigid dorsal gras that can have serious problems, including warping, malalignment, K-wire extrusion, and total visibility from skin shrink-wrapping around the gra.
Complications with diced cartilage gras tend to be relatively minor and con­ned to shape and visibility problems, not absorption.
CONCLUSION
DC-F gras have dramatically revolutionized dorsal gras in rhinoplasty sur­gery. In my personal experience, they have replaced layered  by mm septal gras, stacked conchal gras, and carved costal cartilage gras. DC-F is techni­cally straightforward, simpler, quicker, and oen aesthetically superior to solid cartilage gras, without the risk of warping, malalignment, and K-wire extrusion. In over  patients with follow-up exceeding years, Ihave seen no evidence of gra absorption.
KEY POINTS
DC-F gras have several distinct advantages over other techniques in rhino­plasty surgery for dorsal augmentation.
It is critical to create a symmetrical dorsal platform on which to place the DC-F gra. e gra acts as a capstone to a pyramid; if the pyramid is crooked, the DC-F gra will appear to be displaced.
e length, width, thickness, and shape of the construct must be carefully de­signed.
e shape of the gra can be either uniform or tapered. Tapered gra is thicker cephalically or caudally. e shape should be as accurate as possible before insertion. Surgeons should not expect to create the ideal shape with molding.
Diced cartilage gras are not new. ey have been used ever since modern plastic surgery began. For the past decade, Ihave used DC-F rather than solid dorsal gras for dorsal augmentation.
A DC-F construct is carefully placed in the nose using percutaneous sutures. e skin is redraped and the contour checked. Pieces of cartilage can be re­moved from the open caudal end to achieve nal shape.
Chapter  Dorsal Augmentation: Temporal Fascia–Wrapped Diced Cartilage 317
https://t.me/medicina_free
When the shape of the dorsum is satisfactory, a Denver splint is applied with the foam pad, helping to ensure a smooth dorsum. When the cast is removed, the patient is instructed not to massage the nose or wear glasses for  to weeks.
DC-F gras can be used in the entire range of rhinoplasty cases, from primary cases requiring augmentation to unexpected defects encountered in second­ary cases to composite reconstruction for a collapsed nose, and for burned out cases requiring an aesthetic reconstructive rhinoplasty.
Preoperative planning can include photographic analysis using angles and lengths, CT scans, and a review of previous operative reports.
A gra will solidify within a matter of months and can be easily trimmed or removed in its entirety, shaped, and reinserted as necessary.
Deep temporal fascia should be harvested in as large a piece as possible, oen measuring  to cm vertically by  to cm transversely. Fascia contracts dra­matically!
e cartilage cannot be diced too ne. It is compressed until it is virtually a solid paste and can be passed through the hub of a tuberculin syringe.
e fascial sleeve is made to measure to t the defect. e fascia is pinned to a Silastic block under slight tension and folded to a width of  to mm. e length is determined by the size of the dorsal defect.
e goal is to create a dorsal gra with ideal dimensions and contour. e vol­ume of cartilage will determine the height, whereas the curved, natural con­tour is achieved with the nondominant hand at the time of lling. e dorsum should not be overgraed, because the gra will not be absorbed!
Time is taken to create the ideal-shaped construct while it is on the back table. Surgeons should not expect to make major changes by molding the gra once it is in the nose.
Postoperatively DC-F gras provide a smooth dorsum with signicant aug­mentation, a natural contour, and well-dened dorsal lines.
Complications with diced cartilage gras tend to be relatively minor and con­ned to shape and visibility problems, not absorption.
REFERENCES
1. Daniel, RK, Calvert JC. Diced cartilage in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg :-,
.
2. Daniel RK. Diced cartilage gras in rhinoplasty surgery: current techniques and applications. Plast
Reconstr Surg :-, .
3. Daniel RK. Mastering Rhinoplasty. New York: Springer, .
4. Calvert JW, Brenner KB, DaCosta-Iyer M, et al. Histological analysis of human diced cartilage
gras. Plast Reconstr Surg :-, .
5. Peer LA. Diced cartilage gras. Arch Otolaryngol :-, .
6. Burian F. e Plastic Surgery Atlas. New York: Macmillan, .
7. Guerrerosantos J. Temporoparietal free fascial gras to the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg :-,
.
Part ree e Dorsum318
https://t.me/medicina_free
8. Willingseder P. Cranioplasties by means of diced cartilage and split rib gras. Minerva Chir :-
, .
9. Daniel RK, Sajjadain A. Secondary rhinoplasty: management of the over resected dorsum. Facial
Plast Surg :-, .
10. Welling DB, Maves MD, Schuller DE, et al. Irradiated homologous cartilage gras: long-term re-
sults. Arch Otolaryngol Head neck Surg :-, .
11. Erol OO. e Turkish delight: a pliable gra for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg :-,
.
12. Kim EK, Daniel RK. Operative techniques in Asian rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J :-, .
13. Daniel RK. Middle Eastern rhinoplasty: anatomy, aesthetics, and surgical planning. Facial Plast
Surg :-, .
14. Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: septal saddle nose deformity and composite reconstruction. Plast Recon-
str Surg :-, .
15. Daniel RK, Brenner KA. Saddle nose deformity: a new classication and treatment. Facial Plast
Surg Clin North Am :-, .
16. Daniel RK. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little Brown, .
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
https://t.me/medicina_free
PART FOUR
e Tip
This page intentionally left blankThis page intentionally left blank
https://t.me/medicina_free
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
https://t.me/medicina_free
17
Basic Nasal Tip Surgery:
Anatomy and Technique
Jack P. Gunter  Michael R. Lee  Jamil Ahmad  Rod J. Rohrich
T
o provide proper treatment of the nasal tip, the surgeon must have a compre­hensive knowledge of relevant anatomy. Such anatomy provides the framework ultimately responsible for tip position and shape. Furthermore, understanding the role that dierent structures contribute to tip characteristics facilitates opti­mal diagnosis and treatment planning.
Pivotal to success in rhinoplasty is thorough analysis of both the face and nose. Disregarding facial analysis and focusing on the nose alone may lead to overall disharmony and an untoward result. Once the diagnosis has been established, the operative goals are determined. Proper execution of a successful treatment plan requires an understanding of the following:
1. Variations of the so tissues and cartilage framework of the tip and their contributions to external appearance
2. Factors responsible for tip support and how they are interrelated
3. e result that each surgical maneuver or combination of maneuvers has on the overall surgical result
Surgery of the nasal tip requires a comprehensive knowledge of nasal anatomy and support.
In this chapter we will review the relevant anatomy of the nasal tip and operative strategies used to alter the position and shape of the nasal tip.
321
Part Four e Tip322
https://t.me/medicina_free
Treatment planning should be individualized for each patient. Communication with the patient is extremely important to identify any unrealistic expectations and to set more appropriate expectations that are commensurate with what can be achieved with rhinoplasty. Similar deformities of the nasal tip may require dif­ferent modications depending on the aesthetic relationship of the tip with the rest of the nose as well as the face. e use of a graduated approach in modica­tions of the nasal tip allows a safe and predictable approach.
When operating on the nasal tip it is best to follow a graduated approach with constant reassessment before each maneuver.
ANATOMY OF THE NASAL TIP SUPPORT STRUCTURES
Support for the nasal tip is derived from a combination of bony, cartilaginous, and so tissue structures. Bone of the midface provides the foundation for nasal support. Medially, the maxillary crest serves as a buttress for the nasal septum. e septum in return provides crucial support for the external nose and nasal tip. So tissue attachments from the dorsal and caudal septum to the lower lat­eral cartilages have a direct inuence on tip support and location. Laterally, so tissue attachments connect the lower lateral cartilage complex to the bony piri­form aperture.
To rotate the nasal tip, the surgeon must identify and remove anatomic structures resisting upward rotation.
Nasal bones
Upper lateral
cartilage
Sidewall
Ala
Lower lateral
cartilage
Anatomy Topography
Radix
Dorsum
Tip
Tip location is ultimately dependent on the position of the anterior septum and lower lateral cartilages.
-
ere are both major and minor tip support structures.
Chapter  Basic Nasal Tip Surgery: Anatomy and Technique 323
https://t.me/medicina_free
e paired lower lateral cartilages rely signicantly on the dorsal and caudal septum for support. Lower lateral cartilage shape, position, and integrity are all important in terms of nasal tip appearance and functioning of the external nasal valves. Each lower lateral cartilage comprises a medial crus, a middle crus, and a lateral crus. e characteristics of these crura, along with so tissue connections to adjacent structures, dictate the external appearance of the nasal tip.
Major and Minor Tip Support Structures
Major Tip Support Structures
Fibrous connection of lateral crura to the upper lateral cartilages
Abutment and attachment of the lat­eral crural complex to the piriform aperture
Fibrous connection of the medial
Minor Tip Support Structures
Fibrous attachments of the lower lat­eral cartilages to the dorsal septum
Lower lateral cartilage attachments to the skin
Membranous septum
crura to the caudal septum and an­terior nasal spine
Suspensory ligament of the nasal tip
Lateral Crural Attachments to the Upper Lateral Cartilages
Nasal bones
Upper lateral cartilage
e upper lateral cartilages are secured cephalically by their connection to the nasal bones. Medially, the upper lateral cartilages abut and connect to the dorsal septum. Caudally, the upper lateral cartilages exhibit a so tissue attachment to the cephalic border of the lateral crura at the scroll area. is connection pro­vides support to the lateral crura and nasal tip.
Lower lateral cartilages:
Lateral crus Medial crus
Piriform aperture
Accessory cartilages
Septum
Maxillary crest
Anterior nasal spine
Part Four e Tip324
https://t.me/medicina_free
Connective tissue bers that attach the lateral crura to the upper lateral cartilages allow movement between the two structures while providing tip support. Violat­ing the so tissue connection between these two structures with an incision will obliterate this support as will cephalic trim of the lower lateral crura.
Lateral Crural Attachments to the Piriform Aperture
Lateral crural complex:
Lateral crus
Accessory cartilages
e lateral crura attach laterally to the piriform aperture by means of accessory cartilages. e accessory cartilages share continuous perichondrium, allowing them to function as a unit. Together the lateral crura, accessory cartilages, and associated so tissue connections to the piriform aperture create the lateral cru­ral complex. e so tissue component of this area has been named the piriform ligament, underscoring its importance in nasal support. e lateral crural com­plex provides lateral support and rigidity for the nose.
Fibrous connections
Suspensory ligament of tip
Piriform aperture abutment
Fibrous attachments
Support of the lateral crural complex results from the suspensory ligament of the tip resting on the anterior septal angle, the brous connections to the upper lateral cartilages, and the abutment with the piriform aperture.