Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4366_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
101 Мб
Скачать
Chapter  Component Dorsal Hump Reduction and Dorsal Reconstitution 225
https://t.me/medicina_free
Radix
TDP
Radix
TDP
In women, the new dorsal line on lateral view should lie slightly posterior to a line connecting the nasofrontal angle with the tip-dening points (TDP). e dorsum should be slightly higher in men to avoid feminizing the nose.
In women, the dorsum should lie just below a line connecting the nasofrontal angle with the tip-dening points, whereas the dorsum should be no lower than this line in men to avoid feminizing the nose.
Any patient with a dorsal hump, dened by excess height above a line from the radix to the tip-dening points, is an appropriate candidate for component dor­sal hump reduction.
OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE
In primary rhinoplasty, the open approach is our preferred technique. A closed, or endonasal, approach is used on occasion in the case of the isolated dorsal hump. Guided by a precise preoperative clinical analysis, we perform the initial modication of the dorsum before addressing the tip correction. is sequence establishes the balance between the tip and the dorsum that is crucial to an opti-
Part ree e Dorsum226
https://t.me/medicina_free
mal aesthetic result. Component dorsal hump reduction followed by dorsal re­constitution of the osteocartilaginous hump involves eight essential steps:
1. Dorsal undermining
2. Separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum
3. Incremental component dorsal septal reduction
4. Incremental dorsal bony reduction (using a rasp)
5. Incremental reduction of upper lateral cartilages (if indicated)
6. ree-point dorsal palpation test
7. Reconstitution of the dorsum with sutures (most common), spreader aps, and/or spreader gras (if indicated)
8. Medial/lateral osteotomies (if indicated)
1. Dorsal Undermining
Meticulous skeletonization is used to expose the dorsal osteocartilaginous frame­work, maintaining the plane of dissection as close to the cartilaginous surfaces as possible. Dissection is continued subperiosteally over the bony vault. e peri­osteal layer protects against postoperative so tissue adhesions and camouages the reconstructed bony vault; care must be taken not to tear the periosteum ex­cessively. Preservation of the lateral so tissue and periosteal attachments to the bony sidewalls provides signicant support and stability for the nasal pyramid aer osteotomies have been performed; therefore lateral dissection must be lim­ited to the amount necessary to allow access for bony hump reduction.
Preservation of the lateral so tissue and periosteal attachments to the bony sidewalls provides signicant support and stability for the nasal pyramid aer osteotomies have been performed; therefore lateral dissection must be limited to the amount necessary to allow access for bony hump reduction.
Chapter  Component Dorsal Hump Reduction and Dorsal Reconstitution 227
https://t.me/medicina_free
Extensive undermining is needed only in older patients, patients with thick skin, and patients with a signicant osteocartilaginous hump (greater than mm). Care must be taken to avoid dissection under the nasal bones and detachment of the upper edge of the upper lateral cartilages. At times the surgeon must gently push the upper lateral cartilages down and out of the way to avoid inadvertent transection when reducing the septum and/or the bony dorsum.
2. Separation of the Upper Lateral Cartilages From the Septum
Creating bilateral superior submucoperichondrial tunnels is essential before beginning the component reduction of the dorsal hump. e mucoperichon­drium of the dorsal septum is elevated, from caudal to cephalad, until the eleva­tor reaches the nasal bones. e upper lateral cartilages can be sharply separated from their junction with the septum without damaging the mucosa. is maneu­ver also allows removal of the bony and cartilaginous hump while sparing the mucosa. Extramucosal resection of the bony and cartilaginous components is a critical concept; preservation of the mucosa reduces the potential for late cica­tricial narrowing of the internal nasal valve and webbing of the vestibule. Fur­thermore, spreader gras can then be placed in a closed space and dorsal gras separated from the nasal cavity. Preservation of mucosal integrity also aords greater overall stability aer septal reconstruction.
Creation of bilateral submucoperichondrial tunnels before component reduction of the dorsal hump prevents cicatricial narrowing of the internal nasal valve and webbing of the vestibule.
Part ree e Dorsum228
https://t.me/medicina_free
3. Incremental Component Dorsal Septal Reduction
Once the subperichondrial tunnels have been made and the transverse por­tions of the upper lateral cartilages have been separated from the septum using a No.scalpel, a cartilaginous hump in three pieces results—the septum cen­trally and the transverse portions of the upper lateral cartilages laterally. Dorsal hump reduction begins with the isolated central septum, using serial incremental resections of the septal cartilage with angled septal scissors under direct vision. It is important to preserve the upper lateral cartilages—equal resection of the upper lateral cartilages and septum results in rounding of the dorsum, whereas excessive resection of the dorsal edges of the upper lateral cartilages as compared with the septum results in an inverted-V deformity or an overly narrow midvault.
Excessive resection of the dorsal edges of the upper lateral cartilages can lead to an inverted-V deformity or an overly narrow midvault.
Chapter  Component Dorsal Hump Reduction and Dorsal Reconstitution 229
https://t.me/medicina_free
4. Incremental Dorsal Bony Reduction
A sharp, downbiting diamond rasp is used to reduce the osseous hump. Reduc­tion of small and medium humps (mm or less) can usually be accomplished with incremental rasping. A slightly oblique bias should be maintained while rasping to minimize the risk of avulsion of the upper lateral cartilages or sep­tum from the bony vault. Rasping should proceed along the le and right dorsal aesthetic lines and then centrally in a methodical fashion using controlled, short rasp excursions with the thumb and index nger of the nondominant hand used to stabilize the bony vault. Infrequently, a guarded mm osteotome may be re­quired to reduce larger bony humps. e osteotomy should proceed from the caudal edge of the nasal bones to the radix at or slightly above the level of the planned dorsum in a conservative manner. is is followed with a rasp for nal bony adjustments. Alternatively, a power oscillating burr with a dorsal skin pro­tector can be used under direct visualization to remove large cranial bony humps.
Reduction of the bony hump is most commonly carried out with a downbiting rasp; large humps may require a guarded osteotome or a power oscillating burr with a dorsal skin protector.
5. Incremental Reduction of Upper Lateral Cartilages
Only aer reduction of the cartilaginous septal and bony dorsal components of the hump is reduction of the upper lateral cartilages considered. However, this may be unnecessary in some cases, and it is essential to avoid overresection of the upper lateral cartilages to prevent internal nasal valve collapse and long-term irregularity of the dorsum. nasal bones and a high and narrow osteocartilaginous framework are noted pre­operatively.
,
It is even more important to avoid this when short
Part ree e Dorsum230
https://t.me/medicina_free
Incremental reduction of the upper lateral cartilages is typically performed from either the dorsal edges with large hump reductions (greater than mm) or from the caudal border of the upper lateral cartilages when one is attempting to shorten the nose and/or reduce lateral side wall fullness in the scroll area.
6. ree-Point Dorsal Palpation Test
roughout the dorsal reduction procedure, it is crucial to repeat the three­point dorsal palpation test aer each modication of the dorsum. is test is performed with the dominant index ngertip, moistened with normal saline so­lution. e ngertip gently palpates the le and right dorsal aesthetic lines and then palpates centrally to detect any dorsal irregularities or contour depressions.
Maintaining the appropriate height of the upper lateral cartilages also preserves the dorsal aesthetic lines, permitting any necessary narrowing or straightening of the lines. Aer the skin envelope is redraped, the three-point dorsal palpation test is performed to ensure that a straight and smooth dorsum has been obtained before septal reconstruction or lateral osteotomies are begun.
Use of the three-point dorsal palpation test aer each maneuver will help to en­sure the creation of a smooth, straight dorsum.
It is important to make certain that the upper lateral cartilages are pulled in a dorsal direction to their correct position, because they have a tendency to fall away from the dorsum, giving the false impression that they have been appro­priately aligned relative to the dorsal septum and bony vault when in fact they are still excessive.
Chapter  Component Dorsal Hump Reduction and Dorsal Reconstitution 231
https://t.me/medicina_free
It is important to make certain that the upper lateral cartilages are pulled in a dorsal direction to their correct position, because they have a tendency to fall away from the dorsum giving the false impression that they have been appropri­ately aligned relative to the dorsal septum and bony vault when in fact they are still excessive.
7. Reconstitution of the Dorsum
When they have been appropriately preserved, the dorsal edges of the upper lat­eral cartilages act as “autospreaders,” maintaining the T-shaped contour of the dorsum that is critical for balanced dorsal aesthetic lines and preservation of the internal valves.
In addition to preservation of the upper lateral cartilages, proper reconstitution of the upper lateral cartilages with sutures (most common), spreader aps, and/or spreader gras (if indicated) is also essential. of dorsal reconstitution techniques that rely solely on appropriate suture place­ment. is approach has largely obviated the need for spreader gras.
,
We typically employ three types
Type 1: Midvault Restoration Using the Upper Lateral Cartilage Tension-Spanning Suture
2-4 mm
A - PDS suture is placed from the dorsal edges of both upper lateral cartilages to the distal septum, advancing both upper lateral cartilages mm distally along the septum.
Part ree e Dorsum232
https://t.me/medicina_free
A second suture can be placed proximally along the upper lateral cartilages and septum as needed to give extra support and improve contour at any points of irregularity or bulging if a symmetrical upper lateral cartilage position was not achieved with placement of the previous suture.
e upper lateral tension-spanning suture stabilizes the upper lateral cartilages to the septum on slight tension, thereby providing a straighter and more anatomic contour. Use of the upper lateral tension-spanning suture is particularly bene­cial in thin-skinned patients because of increased visibility of contour irregulari­ties, and in patients requiring larger (mm or greater) dorsal hump reduction in which the dierential between the septum and upper lateral cartilages is more pronounced, leading to a greater propensity for midvault irregularity.
Type 2: Midvault Restoration Without Using the Upper Lateral Cartilage Tension-Spanning Suture
e - PDS suture is placed without advancing the edge of both upper lateral cartilages distally along the dorsal septum. is is indicated in patients with upper lateral cartilages that can maintain a straight contour aer release from the septum. is is oen the case for patients with strong cartilage who require minimal dorsal hump reduction. is is also indicated in patients where narrow­ing at the distal end of the midvault must be avoided. e upper lateral tension-
Chapter  Component Dorsal Hump Reduction and Dorsal Reconstitution 233
https://t.me/medicina_free
spanning suture oen re-creates and enhances the natural taper seen with the upper lateral cartilages as they reach the supratip region in their distalmost dor­sal attachment. By not placing the upper lateral cartilages on tension when reap­proximating them to the septum, the surgeon is able to diminish the narrowing eect of this suture.
Type 3: Midvault Restoration With Spreader Flap Modication
Type 3A
Type 3B
e - PDS sutures are placed caudal to the upper edge of the upper lateral cartilages, thereby infolding the superior edge of the upper lateral cartilages. is serves a spreader-type function. is technique should be employed when attempting to widen the midvault. It can be used with (see type A, above) or without (see type B, below) advancement of the upper lateral cartilages along the dorsal septum acting as an upper lateral cartilage tension-spanning suture. e decision to perform the spreader ap with an upper lateral cartilage tension­spanning suture is based on the particular anatomic goals for the patient as de­scribed earlier with the type  and  techniques.
Part ree e Dorsum234
https://t.me/medicina_free
Reconstitution of the upper lateral cartilages following component reduction with sutures, such as the upper lateral cartilage tension-spanning suture, is an important component to achieving smooth and symmetric dorsal aesthetic lines.
Since the introduction of spreader gras in , surgeons have used them ex­tensively in both primary and secondary rhinoplasty.
,,
Many rhinoplasty sur­geons have embraced the concept, leading several authors to describe variants of the spreader gra and/or spreader aps with dierent indications.
-
However, the enthusiasm behind spreader gras and/or aps may have extended their ap­plication beyond their utility, resulting in their application when not indicated.
Patients undergoing primary rhinoplasty with no existing nasal obstruction are unlikely to need spreader gra placement when the midvault is properly re­stored. Avoiding spreader gra placement may obviate the need for cartilage gra harvest and prevents dorsal widening when this is not desired. Use of the aforementioned approach for reconstituting the dorsum has proved reliable and reproducible while avoiding the use of spreader gras in a majority of cases. Situations in which spreader gra and/or ap use is more likely to be required include secondary rhinoplasty midvault reconstruction, existing internal nasal valve dysfunction, and narrow nose syndrome in primary cases.
Criteria for Using Spreader Gras and/or Flaps
in Primary Rhinoplasty
1. Inverted-V deformity
2.
Existing nasal obstruction secondary to internal valve insuciency Asymmetrical dorsal aesthetic lines despite the use of upper lateral tension-
3. spanning sutures
4.
Correction of dorsal septal deviation Dorsal reduction greater than mm
5.
6.
Ethnic nose with weak cartilaginous support Males with a narrow nose
7.