Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6009_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
Normal Postoperative Change: Disc Space
KEY FACTS
http://pdf-radiology.com
TERMINOLOGY
• Substantial imaging overlap in routine early postoperative findings vs. surgical complications ○ Early postoperative imaging not routinely obtained ○ Edema, granulation tissue at operative site may simulate
residual/recurrent disc herniation
○ Marrow changes and fluid associated with intervertebral
fusion may simulate appearance of spondylodiscitis
IMAGING
• CT: Evaluation of graft position, hardware, bony integrity,
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
and fractures ○ Graft fusion with bony bridging best evaluated by thin-
section CT
• MR: Evaluation of endplates, paraspinal soft tissues, epidural space, and intrathecal structures
(Left) Sagittal unenhanced T1W MR shows prior laminectomy and fusion with pedicle screws of the L4-L5 level. Fusion appears solid, with high signal fatty marrow conversion of the disc space ﬇ and adjacent fatty type II endplate changes ſt. There is a disc extrusion at the L5-S1 level st. (Right) Sagittal reformatted NECT shows intervertebral fusion of the L5­S1 using fusion cages ﬇. Mature bone bridges the intervertebral space ſt, demonstrating a good bony union.
○ Postoperative disc signal dependent on preoperative
degree of degeneration, specific surgery and type of implant, and presence or absence of biologic modifiers (i.e., rhBMP-2)
○ May see transient increase in disc height and T2 signal
immediately after discectomy (not related to infection)
○ Discectomy accelerates degenerative appearance of disc
with loss of T2 signal and loss of disc height
○ Solid fusion typically shown by fatty marrow
infiltration/ossification of disc with T1 hyperintensity
○ Typical postoperative discectomy enhancement consists
of smooth linear enhancement of disc paralleling endplates, with enhancement of dorsal annulus at curettage site
(Left) Sagittal T1 C+ FS MR shows marked endplate ſt and fine linear enhancement ﬇ of the intervertebral disc due to degeneration. There is no endplate irregularity or paravertebral mass to suggest disc space infection. Fine horizontal linear enhancement is pronounced but not necessarily indicative of disc space infection. (Right) Sagittal T2WI MR shows early look of L5-S1 posterior lumbar invertebral fusion (PLIF) with low signal graft material within the disc space ſt and surrounding hyperintense fluid ﬇.
50
Normal Postoperative Change: Disc Space
http://pdf-radiology.com

TERMINOLOGY

Definitions
• Discectomy or partial discectomy ○ Surgical removal of herniated portion of intervertebral
disc
• Interbody fusion ○ Disc removal by posterior (posterior lumbar
intervertebral fusion) or anterior (anterior lumbar
intervertebral fusion) approach ○ Insertion of bone graft &/or fusion hardware ○ Goal is arthrodesis (fusion) across disc space
• Disc replacement ○ Variety of intervertebral hardware ○ Preserves motion across segment: Arthroplasty rather
than arthrodesis
• Pseudoarthrosis ○ Failure to obtain bony union after fusion ○ Ideally, fused segment will show
– Mature bridging bone on radiographs, CT – Cold on bone scan 6-12 months postop – Resolution of type I endplate marrow or conversion to
type II
– No motion on flexion-extension radiographs
○ However
– Geometry of pseudoarthrosis may be complex and
difficult to appreciate on radiographs, CT
– Bone scan performs poorly, with significant false-
negative and false-positive findings □ Somewhat better performance at 12 months
relative to 6 months postop
– Stability provided by instrumentation may prevent
motion on flexion-extension films, despite pseudoarthrosis □ 2-3° motion may be present with fusion due to
compliance of normal bone
– Pedicle screw fracture can be seen with
pseudoarthrosis □ Instrumentation is temporizing mechanism until
bony union can occur
• Peridural fibrosis ○ Some degree of peridural fibrosis along margin of thecal
sac is typical finding following discectomy – Edema and tissue disruption at discectomy site
particularly conspicuous in first 6 weeks postoperatively
• Nerve root clumping, enhancement ○ Transient nerve root clumping can be identified in early
postoperative period, often resolves spontaneously
○ Solitary nerve root enhancement may be seen
perioperatively; inflammation related to compression, manipulation
○ MR: Evaluation of endplates, paraspinal soft tissues,
epidural space, and intrathecal structures – Postoperative disc signal dependent on preoperative
degree of degeneration, specific surgery and type of implant, and presence or absence of biologic modifiers (i.e., rhBMP-2)
– May see transient increase in disc height and T2 signal
immediately after discectomy (not related to infection)
– Discectomy accelerates degenerative appearance of
disc with loss of T2 signal and loss of disc height
– Disc space surrounding implants may initially show T2
hyperintensity (1st few weeks) but should disappear over time
– Solid fusion typically shown by fatty marrow
infiltration/ossification of disc with T1 hyperintensity
– Typical postoperative discectomy enhancement
consists of smooth linear enhancement of disc paralleling endplates, with enhancement of dorsal annulus at curettage site □ No edema or enhancement of paraspinal soft
tissues (this would indicate infection)

SELECTED REFERENCES

1. Yang H et al: MRI manifestations and differentiated diagnosis of postoperative spinal complications. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 29(4):522-6, 2009
2. Tokuhashi Y et al: Clinical course and significance of the clear zone around the pedicle screws in the lumbar degenerative disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33(8):903-8, 2008
3. Rutherford EE et al: Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances. Radiographics. 27(6):1737-49, 2007
4. Williams AL et al: CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 26(8):2057-66, 2005
5. Carmouche JJ et al: Epidural abscess and discitis complicating instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29(23):E542-6, 2004
6. Ross JS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative spine. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 4(3):281-91, 2000
7. Lonstein JE et al: Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 81(11):1519-28, 1999
8. Fritsch EW et al: The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 21(5):626-33, 1996
9. Larsen JM et al: Assessment of pseudarthrosis in pedicle screw fusion: a prospective study comparing plain radiographs, flexion/extension radiographs, CT scanning, and bone scintigraphy with operative findings. J Spinal Disord. 9(2):117-20, 1996
10. Ross JS: Magnetic resonance assessment of the postoperative spine. Degenerative disc disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 29(4):793-808, 1991
11. Ross JS et al: Lumbar spine: postoperative assessment with surface-coil MR imaging. Radiology. 164(3):851-60, 1987
12. Ross JS et al: Postoperative cervical spine: MR assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 11(6):955-62, 1987
Normal Anatomy and Techniques

IMAGING

Imaging Recommendations
• Best imaging tool ○ CT: Evaluation of graft position, hardware, bony integrity,
and fractures – Graft fusion with bony bridging best evaluated by
thin-section CT
51
Normal Postoperative Change: Disc Space
http://pdf-radiology.com
(Left) Sagittal T1WI C+ FS MR shows granulation tissue enhancement in the dorsal margin of the L4-5 disc st at the site of a partial discectomy. This is a typical finding following discectomy. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ FS MR shows a small amount of enhancing peridural fibrosis at the site of a partial discectomy st. The enhancement
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
differentiates fibrosis from a recurrent disc herniation.
(Left) Axial T1WI MR through a level of prior laminectomy st shows soft tissue flattening the ventral margin of the thecal sac, particularly prominent in the right anterolateral position ﬇, where the appearance is concerning for representing recurrent disc herniation. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ MR in the same patient shows enhancing peridural fibrosis and annulus ﬇. There is extensive enhancement of the disc margin ſt reflecting diffuse disc degeneration and annular fissures.
(Left) Preoperative sagittal T1WI MR shows type I marrow changes st adjacent to degenerative spondylolisthesis of the L4-L5. The L4-5 and L5­1 discs are collapsed. (Right) Sagittal T1WI MR in the same patient demonstrates conversion of type I to type II marrow st adjacent to the L4­L5 disc space. The patient has undergone posterior instrumentation and fusion of L4-S1. Note the metallic artifact from a pedicle screw placement ſt. The L5-S1 disc shows fatty marrow conversion ﬇.
52
Normal Postoperative Change: Disc Space
http://pdf-radiology.com
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
(Left) Sagittal T2* GRE MR shows changes of a C4-C5 discectomy. Ventral extradural defect ﬇ actually represents metallic susceptibility artifact and was not present on T1WI. (Right) Sagittal T1 MR shows diffuse hyperintensity within every lumbar intervertebral disc ſt, consistent with calcification &/or fatty marrow replacement. There is typical squaring of the lumbar vertebral bodies of ankylosing spondylitis.
(Left) Lateral radiograph shows a 2-level posterior ﬇ PLIF with 3 levels of pedicle screws. Posterior rods show lucency around 1 of the L4 and 1 of the sacral screws ſt. (Right) Axial NECT in the same patient shows the interbody fusion graft ﬇ and the lucency around the left sacral screw ſt and normal appearance of the intervertebral graft. The degree of the lucency decreased on 1-year follow-up films.
(Left) Axial CT following myelography shows PLIF with 2 intervertebral grafts within the disc with radiopaque markers on each end ſt. (Right) Lateral radiograph of the cervical spine shows C5-C6 discectomy and solid anterior fusion ſt (ADCF) with metallic plate and screw placement ﬇. Hardware is intact and appears satisfactorily positioned without evidence of loosening, fracture, or subsidence.
53
Normal Postoperative Change: Epidural Space
KEY FACTS
http://pdf-radiology.com
TERMINOLOGY
• Peridural fibrosis ○ Some degree of peridural fibrosis along margin of thecal
sac is typical finding following discectomy
○ Edema and tissue disruption at discectomy site
particularly conspicuous in first 6 weeks postoperatively ○ Can simulate disc residual/recurrent disc herniation ○ Scarring has been implicated with nerve root irritation in
failed back surgery syndrome
• Postoperative fluid collection
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
○ Fluid collection in operative bed is not uncommon in
immediate postoperative setting ○ May have complex signal ○ May have fluid-fluid levels ○ May demonstrate peripheral enhancement
IMAGING
• Utility of MR in postoperative epidural space related to timing since surgery
(Left) Sagittal T1WI C+ MR shows L2-L5 laminectomy with a postoperative fluid collection within the surgical bed ﬇, effacing the dorsal thecal sac st. A small amount of enhancement is seen superiorly ſt. There was no clinical suspicion of infection, and the patient did well without further intervention. (Right) Sagittal T2WI MR in the same patient immediately following surgery shows effacement of the thecal sac ſt and ventral displacement of the cauda equina from the laminectomy site fluid collection.
○ If imaging within 4-6 weeks of surgery, normal
postoperative changes may mimic epidural mass, residual disc herniation
○ Acute imaging of postoperative spine best when limited
to definition of epidural hemorrhage or CSF leak (pseudomeningocele)
○ Definition of degree of thecal sac compression limited by
poor correlation to patient's symptomatology
• Metal artifact due to disc space implant, posterior fusion hardware ○ Usually worth attempt at imaging with MR even in face
of significant metal artifact
• MR: Best for epidural space evaluation ○ Hemorrhage ○ Pseudomeningocele ○ Scar vs. disc material
(Left) Axial T2WI MR shows an asymptomatic fluid collection in the laminectomy bed st, effacing the dorsal thecal sac. (Right) Axial image from a CT myelogram shows changes of a left hemilaminotomy. The actual bony defect is difficult to appreciate on this image. What is apparent is the absence of the left ligamentum flavum ﬉ and mild distortion of the thecal sac.
54
Normal Postoperative Change: Epidural Space
http://pdf-radiology.com

TERMINOLOGY

Definitions
• Laminectomy ○ Removal of lamina to decompress spinal canal
– Unilateral (hemilaminectomy) or bilateral – Partial removal of lamina and ligamentum flavum
technically laminotomy, although terminology sometimes used interchangeably
• Posterior instrumentation ○ Including pedicle screws, paraspinous rods, transverse
rods, laminar hooks – Translaminar or facet screws; can be inserted with
minimally invasive techniques
• Posterolateral fusion ○ With severe loss of disc height, in lieu of interbody fusion ○ Lateral bone graft placement, fusion of transverse
processes
○ Usually supplemented by posterior instrumentation
• Peridural fibrosis ○ Some degree of peridural fibrosis along margin of thecal
sac is typical finding following discectomy – Edema and tissue disruption at discectomy site
particularly conspicuous in first 6 weeks postoperatively □ Can simulate disc residual/recurrent disc herniation
○ Scarring has been implicated with nerve root irritation in
failed back surgery syndrome
• Postoperative fluid collection ○ Fluid collection in operative bed is not uncommon in
immediate postoperative setting – May have complex signal – May have fluid-fluid levels – May demonstrate peripheral enhancement
○ Can be difficult to differentiate from postoperative
hematoma, pseudomeningocele, infected collection
• Malpositioned pedicle screw ○ Pedicle screw should traverse pedicle and be securely
positioned within vertebral body
○ Malpositioning includes
– Perforation of anterior cortex of vertebral body – Perforation of cortex of pedicle
□ ± compromise of intervertebral neural foramen or
spinal canal
• Lucency around pedicle screw ○ Clear zones (≥ 1 mm) around pedicle screws may be
encountered on postoperative radiographs – Traditionally, concerning for loosening or infection
○ 1 longitudinal series describes majority (2/3) of clear
zones as resolving over several years – Persistence 2 years postoperatively predictive of
pseudoarthrosis
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
– Little use in evaluation of epidural space, unless in
conjunction with intrathecal contrast for definition of thecal sac compression
○ MR: Best for epidural space evaluation
– Hemorrhage – Pseudomeningocele – Scar vs. disc material
○ Utility of MR in postoperative epidural space related to
timing since surgery – If imaging within 4-6 weeks of surgery, normal
postoperative changes may mimic epidural mass, residual disc herniation
– Acute imaging of postoperative spine best when
limited to definition of epidural hemorrhage or CSF leak (pseudomeningocele)
– Definition of degree of thecal sac compression limited
by poor correlation to patient's symptomatology
– Metal artifact due to disc space implant, posterior
fusion hardware □ Usually worth attempt at imaging with MR even in
face of significant metal artifact

SELECTED REFERENCES

1. Ghobrial GM et al: Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 139:76-80, 2015
2. Walsh KM et al: Spinal cord stimulation: a review of the safety literature and proposal for perioperative evaluation and management. Spine J. 15(8):1864­9, 2015
3. Yang H et al: MRI manifestations and differentiated diagnosis of postoperative spinal complications. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 29(4):522-6, 2009
4. Tokuhashi Y et al: Clinical course and significance of the clear zone around the pedicle screws in the lumbar degenerative disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33(8):903-8, 2008
5. Rutherford EE et al: Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances. Radiographics. 27(6):1737-49, 2007
6. Williams AL et al: CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 26(8):2057-66, 2005
7. Carmouche JJ et al: Epidural abscess and discitis complicating instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29(23):E542-6, 2004
8. Ross JS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative spine. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 4(3):281-91, 2000
9. Lonstein JE et al: Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 81(11):1519-28, 1999
10. Fritsch EW et al: The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 21(5):626-33, 1996
11. Larsen JM et al: Assessment of pseudarthrosis in pedicle screw fusion: a prospective study comparing plain radiographs, flexion/extension radiographs, CT scanning, and bone scintigraphy with operative findings. J Spinal Disord. 9(2):117-20, 1996
12. Ross JS: Magnetic resonance assessment of the postoperative spine. Degenerative disc disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 29(4):793-808, 1991
13. Ross JS et al: Lumbar spine: postoperative assessment with surface-coil MR imaging. Radiology. 164(3):851-60, 1987
14. Ross JS et al: Postoperative cervical spine: MR assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 11(6):955-62, 1987

IMAGING

Imaging Recommendations
• Best imaging tool ○ CT: Best for definition of hardware, posterior element
integrity
55
Normal Postoperative Change: Epidural Space
http://pdf-radiology.com
(Left) Normal epidural space after laminectomy is shown. Sagittal T1WI MR shows the laminectomy site as intermediate signal at L4 and L5 levels ſt. There is mild mass effect on the dorsal thecal sac ﬇. (Right) Sagittal T2WI FS MR in the same patient shows fluid within the L4-L5 laminectomy bed st effacing the dorsal thecal sac.
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
A small amount of extraarachnoid fluid tracks cephalad ſt up to the L1 level.
(Left) Axial T2WI FS MR following lumbar laminectomy shows complex fluid collection in laminectomy bed st as well as a small amount of subdural fluid ſt. The patient did well postoperatively. (Right) Axial T2WI MR shows a large posterior fluid collection ſt following multilevel fixation and pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Note that the posterior rods by metal artifact st and bone graft present posteriorly at the level of rods ﬇. This degree of fluid is not uncommon in the immediate postoperative period.
(Left) Axial T1WI C+ FS MR shows pedicle screws ſt and a laminectomy defect st. Diffusely increased signal probably reflects the effect of field inhomogeneity generated by the pedicle screws and resulting in poor fat saturation that obscures any potential enhancement due to underlying peridural fibrosis. (Right) Axial T1WI MR shows a defect in the right lamina and ligamentum flavum st at the site of a left L5 hemilaminectomy.
56
Normal Postoperative Change: Epidural Space
http://pdf-radiology.com
(Left) Axial nonenhanced T1WI at L4-L5 demonstrates appearance of peridural fibrosis ſt surrounding the left lateral aspect of thecal sac and exiting root. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ at L4-L5 demonstrates enhancing epidural fibrotic tissue ventral to the thecal sac ſt and the traversing left L5 nerve root. Enhancing scar tissue is also present posteriorly at the laminectomy site ﬊. The enhancing scar shows no mass effect upon the thecal sac and smoothly encompasses the exiting root.
(Left) In this postlaminectomy patient, peridural fibrosis is seen as intermediate signal on a T2-weighted image surrounding the thecal sac and exiting roots ſt. (Right) Postcontrast image in the same patient shows diffuse homogeneous enhancement of the peridural fibrosis. Rounded areas of no enhancement are exiting roots and root sleeves ſt, not to be confused with nonenhancing disc herniations.
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
(Left) Typical large extrusion and free fragment with peripheral enhancement are shown. T1WI C+ FS shows peripheral enhancement of the residual herniation ﬇ within the left side of the epidural space. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ MR shows a modest­sized posterior fluid collection along the operative tract ﬇, which is commonly present in the immediate postoperative period. Epidural fibrosis shows homogeneous enhancement ſt.
57
Metal Artifact
KEY FACTS
http://pdf-radiology.com
TERMINOLOGY
• CT: Beam-hardening artifact and blooming artifact
• MR: Magnetic susceptibility artifact
• Image degradation related to metal prostheses/implants
IMAGING
• CT: Artifact from metal hardware related to image reconstruction algorithm, tube current, x-ray kilovolt peak, pitch, hardware composition, shape, & location ○ Beam-hardening artifact is dark banding between dense
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
objects, such as bone
○ Bloom artifacts result of partial volume effects or areas
of photon starvation propagated by high-density structures, such as metal, within scanned object
○ Materials with lower x-ray attenuation coefficients
produce less artifactual distortions – Plastic (best) < titanium < < tantalum < stainless steel
< cobalt chrome (worst)
(Left) Plain film shows right lateral fusion ſt extending from the L2-L5 with vertebral body screws and longitudinal rods, interbody graft material, and lower lumbar posterior pedicle screw fixation from L4­S1 ﬇. (Right) MR study in the same patient shows very little obscuration of the central canal by artifact, despite the amount of metal present. Metal artifact is present from lateral fusion ſt and posterior fixation ﬇. Solid fusion with incorporated graft is noted st by fatty disc space signal.
○ Metal composition, mass, orientation + position of
implant are important factors that determine magnitude of image artifact
• MR susceptibility artifact due to geometric distortion + signal loss secondary to dephasing
• MR methods to minimize metal artifact ○ Fast spin-echo > conventional spin-echo > gradient-echo ○ Larger field of view ○ Smaller voxel size ○ Increase transmit and receive bandwidth ○ Frequency encoding direction along long axis of
hardware ○ Lower magnet field strength ○ STIR sequences are alternative method of fat
suppression and less dependent on homogeneity of
main magnetic field
(Left) Coronal CT reconstruction illustrates bloom hardening artifact ſt. Beam artifacts are a result of partial volume effects or underranging caused by areas of photon starvation propagated by high-density structures, such as metal, within the scanned object. When subtle, these artifacts appear as shading and, when severe, as high-intensity streaks and areas of photon starvation. (Right) Axial NECT shows star artifact along the margins of the right corporal screw, which has migrated out st.
58
Metal Artifact
http://pdf-radiology.com

TERMINOLOGY

Definitions
• Magnetic susceptibility ○ Partial magnetization of material in presence of applied
external magnetic field
○ Nonferromagnetic metals may produce local electrical
currents induced by changing scanner magnetic field
○ Tissues with greatly different magnetic susceptibilities in
uniform magnetic field lead to difference of susceptibilities, causing distortion in magnetic field → distortion on MR
○ Magnetic susceptibility artifact consists of 2 additive
components

IMAGING

General Features
• Trade-off must occur in choice of metal ○ Titanium wires exhibit least artifact on CT when
compared to cobalt chrome or stainless steel but are more susceptible to failure
○ Titanium screws + cages produce fewer artifacts than
tantalum but may not have desirable biologic properties
• Use of high peak voltage (kilovolts peak), high tube charge (milliampere-seconds), narrow collimation, and thin sections helps reduce metal-related artifacts ○ Caution should always be exercised, particularly in
children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations
○ Cone beam artifacts caused by geometry of
multichannel CT scanners ↓ by using narrower x-ray beam collimation and low-pitch setting
• Reduce metal-related artifacts ○ Thick sections, lower kernel values (similar to standard
reconstruction algorithm), and extended CT scale
• MR: Potential safety and biologic considerations ○ Stainless steel is safe but produces severe artifacts
(especially with low nickel content)
○ Titanium = tantalum implant artifact; much less, relative
to stainless steel
• Location ○ Intervertebral disc level related to fusion cages, anterior
plates + screws, iatrogenic metal ○ Pedicles related to pedicle screws ○ Dorsal elements related to dorsal stabilization rods,
interspinous process wiring
• Size ○ Variable
• Morphology ○ Central low signal, with indistinct margins, spatial
mismapping of signal giving peripheral curvilinear high signal
Radiographic Findings
• Radiography ○ Visualize hardware malposition and alignment
CT Findings
• NECT ○ Missing data from metal attenuation cause classic
"starburst" or streak artifacts
Normal Anatomy and Techniques
MR Findings
• T1WI ○ Focal central signal loss with peripheral "halo" of ↑ signal
related to spatial mismapping
• T2WI ○ Focal central signal loss with peripheral "halo" of ↑ signal
related to spatial mismapping
○ Artifact minimized with FSE technique
• T2* GRE ○ Blooming of susceptibility artifact with gradient-echo
techniques, worse with increasing echo time
Nonvascular Interventions
• Myelography ○ May be necessary if extensive hardware precludes
adequate MR examination
○ Fluoroscopic positioning will obtain most favorable
projection with overlapping hardware
Imaging Recommendations
• Best imaging tool ○ MR best sequence choice: Fast spin-echo > conventional
spin-echo > gradient-echo
• Protocol advice ○ CT: Thin-section spiral imaging has improved quality
compared to conventional discrete slices
○ MR: Optimum sequence should not contain gradient-
echoes – Preferably FSE technique – FSE: Maintain short echo spacing (short echo train less
critical)
– Single shot FSE sequences with half-Fourier (HASTE)
useful
– Hybrid imaging sequences that use both gradient-
echo and spin-echo components should not be used
– Frequency-selective fat saturation yields poor image
quality with metal implants
– Orienting frequency encoding direction along long
axial of pedicle screws minimizes artifact (except in area just beyond tip of implant)

PATHOLOGY

General Features
• Etiology ○ In anterior cervical discectomies, sufficient metals to
produce artifacts are deposited by contact of metal drill bits + suction tips

CLINICAL ISSUES

Presentation
• Most common signs/symptoms ○ Typically asymptomatic, ancillary finding of surgical
procedure

DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

Image Interpretation Pearls
• Minimize pedicle screw artifact by orienting frequency encoding gradient parallel to screw long axis, using FSE technique; slice thickness 3-4 mm is adequate; thinner sections yield little artifact reduction
59