Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6009_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
102 Мб
Скачать
Heterotopic Bone Formation
KEY FACTS
TERMINOLOGY
• Definition: Bone development in abnormal location
• Occurs in 3 main scenarios: rhBMP-2 related, TDR related,
Complications
ACDF adjacent segment related
IMAGING
• Thin-section CT: High-attenuation bony osteophytes extending into canal or neural foramen with narrowing
• MR for definition of neural/thecal sac compression
• May be difficult to identify on T1WI if it contains fatty marrow mimicking adjacent fat signal
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Graft migration or extrusion
• Adjacent level degenerative change
• Myositis ossificans
PATHOLOGY
Osteobiologic related: Lumbar surgery
(Left) Axial graphic shows
heterotopic bone formation in a patient who has undergone a posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Bone formation is seen within the epidural space ſt with mass effect upon the thecal sac. Heterotopic bone formation is highly correlated with the use of rhBMP-2. (Right) Sagittal NECT shows heterotopic ossification extending inferiorly from the C3 body ſt to cover superior aspect of the C4 plate. This superior margin of the plate is malpositioned & extends to the disc level ﬇.
○ Extradiscal/ectopic/heterotopic bone formation
presumably occurs when bone morphogenetic protein leaks from carrier into epidural space
○ 75% incidence in 1 series of single-level posterior lumbar
interbody fusion (PLIF)
Osteobiologic related: Cervical surgery ○ 11% of rhBMP-2 group vs. 6% in control group
CLINICAL ISSUES
• Majority of heterotopic ossification (HO) appears asymptomatic but symptomatic foraminal stenosis reported sporadically
• HO can be cause of new back pain and radiculopathy
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• HO along PLIF or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion path may be difficult to identify on axial images because it may be mistaken for normal pedicle
• Look closely at sagittal CT to identify bone projecting from disc level
360
(Left) Initial CT myelogram study shows a large facetectomy defect on the left at L5 ſt. Heterotopic bone formation mimics the appearance of facet joint in this patient status post facetectomy and posterior fusion. (Right) CT myelogram in the same patient performed 2 years later shows new heterotopic bone filling in the operative defect ſt, which has the outline of the prior facet joint margin. There is left foraminal stenosis ﬇ from the heterotopic bone.
Recurrent Disc Herniation
KEY FACTS
Complications
TERMINOLOGY
• Recurrent protrusion/extrusion
• Failed back surgery syndrome
• Focal extension of disc material beyond endplate margins at previously operated intervertebral disc level
IMAGING
• Nonenhancing, well-defined mass arising out of intervertebral disc
• Disc material shows no enhancement
• May enhance peripherally after intravenous contrast material due to granulation tissue or dilated epidural plexus
• Rare: Diffuse enhancement if associated with granulation tissue or if postcontrast imaging delayed
• Fat suppression of T1WI (pre-/postgadolinium) may increase sensitivity in detecting peridural fibrosis, differentiating fibrosis from disc
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Peridural fibrosis ○ Immediate homogeneous postcontrast enhancement
• Hemorrhage
• Abscess
• Osteophyte
• Synovial cyst/ganglion cyst
• Vertebral body/epidural tumor ○ Homogeneous enhancement
CLINICAL ISSUES
• Revision microdiscectomy with posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion vs. revision microdiscectomy ○ 30-35% success rate for repeat surgery (range: 12-100%)
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• Best reoperative result in patients with herniation at new level away from operation site
(Left) Axial graphic of the lumbar spine shows a left laminotomy defect. A large right paracentral herniation is present, compressing the thecal sac and roots adjacent to the site of the prior discectomy. (Right) Axial T1WI MR shows right-sided recurrent herniation as a focal epidural mass of intermediate signal with compression of the thecal sac ſt. The exiting right S1 root is obscured by the herniation. Note the normal position of the left S1 root ﬇.
(Left) Axial T2WI MR shows right-sided recurrent extrusion ſt as a focal low signal mass displacing the right S1 root and right lateral margin of the thecal sac. Note the normal left S1 root ﬇. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ MR shows typical central lack of enhancement of herniation ſt with peripheral enhancement of granulation tissue ﬇.
361
Peridural Fibrosis
KEY FACTS
TERMINOLOGY
• Scar formation within epidural space after lumbar surgery
• Part of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS)
Complications
IMAGING
• Infiltration of epidural/perineural fat by enhancing soft tissue density (intensity)
• Variable signal intensity on T2WI
• Immediate homogeneous postcontrast enhancement
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Recurrent disc herniation
• Epidural abscess/phlegmon
• Pseudomeningocele
• Postoperative hemorrhage
• Arachnoiditis
(Left) Axial T1WI MR shows a right laminectomy defect and extensive epidural fibrosis ſt surrounding the right lateral and dorsal aspect of the thecal sac and the exiting root ﬇. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ MR shows a right hemilaminectomy defect and diffuse enhancement of epidural fibrosis surrounding the right lateral aspect of the thecal sac ſt. The nerve root is seen as a nonenhancing structure within the fibrosis ﬇. Enhancement continues into the operative defect in the disc st.
PATHOLOGY
• Postoperative scarring is part of normal reparative mechanism
• May be asymptomatic; contribution to clinical symptoms controversial
• Up to 1/4 of all FBSS cases
• Most patients with some degree of fibrosis are asymptomatic
CLINICAL ISSUES
• Adult with gradual onset low back pain following initially successful disc surgery
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• Identification of only epidural fibrosis in FBSS patient is contraindication to reoperation, yields poor reoperative result
362
(Left) Axial T2WI MR a shows hemilaminectomy defect and absence of ligamentum flavum ﬇. Epidural fibrosis surrounding the left S1 root shows slight increased signal relative to adjacent disc material ſt. (Right) Axial T1WI C+ MR shows a left hemilaminectomy defect ﬊. A small amount of epidural fibrosis surrounds the exiting left S1 root, which diffusely enhances ſt, as does the operative defect in the posterior anulus.
Arachnoiditis/Adhesions
KEY FACTS
Complications
TERMINOLOGY
• Postinflammatory changes usually involving cauda equina
IMAGING
• Thickening and clumping of nerve roots in cauda equina
• Adhesion of nerve roots to peripheral dura (empty sac sign)
• Soft tissue mass (pseudomass)
• Minimal to mild pial, dural enhancement
• Nerve root calcification (rare) or calcific mass (arachnoiditis ossificans)
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Spinal stenosis
• Cauda equina neoplasms
• Carcinomatous meningitis
• Intradural metastases
PATHOLOGY
• Inflammatory, collagenous mass
• Historically related to trauma or spinal meningitis, now more commonly associated with prior lumbar surgery
CLINICAL ISSUES
• Most common symptoms are chronic low back pain or leg pain (radicular or nonradicular) ○ Simulates spinal stenosis and polyneuropathy
• Less common are paraparesis, hypoesthesia, gait disorder, bowel/bladder dysfunction
• Treatment ○ Pain rehabilitation ○ Spinal cord stimulation
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• Absent discrete nerve roots in thecal sac with clumping or empty sac sign highly suggestive of lumbar arachnoiditis
• Radiological findings may be present without clinical symptoms
(Left) Sagittal T1 C+ MR shows clumping of the nerve roots of the cauda equina ſt. There is faint enhancement. A L2-L3 laminectomy defect is noted. (Right) Sagittal CECT myelography shows a large, mass-like filling defect in the caudal thecal sac (pseudomass) st engulfing the cauda equina due to chronic changes of arachnoiditis.
(Left) Axial T2WI MR shows diffuse thickening of the distal dural sac and clumping of the roots consistent with severe arachnoiditis. Note the thickening low signal dural margin suggestive of calcific arachnoiditis ﬇. (Right) Axial T2WI MR in this patient with ankylosing spondylitis shows peripheral adhesion of the nerve roots to the margins of the thecal sac st, resulting in the empty sac sign of arachnoiditis. This pattern may cause cauda equina syndrome in patients with longstanding spondyloarthropathy.
363
Arachnoiditis Ossificans
KEY FACTS
TERMINOLOGY
• Intradural ossification associated with postinflammation adhesion and clumping of lumbar nerve roots
Complications
IMAGING
• Calcification morphology ○ Thin, linear ○ Mass-like, globular
• Calcific density on CT ○ Contrast may obscure calcifications on CT myelography
• T1WI: Areas of ossification are variable, mixed signal ○ Hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense
• T2WI: Linear or globular hypointensity if calcifications are present ○ Larger areas of ossification can occasionally be
hyperintense on T2WI
• May exert mass effect on conus and cauda equina
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR through the lumbar spine shows a nodular hypointense signal along the margins of the caudal thecal sac ſt due to calcific arachnoiditis. Note the prior multilevel anterior fusions. (Right) Sagittal NECT through the lumbar spine more clearly shows the coarse calcifications of the dura and thecal sac ſt. CT also shows intervertebral fusion at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1.
PATHOLOGY
• Etiologies ○ Prior trauma ○ Spinal surgery ○ Subarachnoid hemorrhage ○ Pantopaque myelography ○ Spinal anesthesia
• Gross pathology: Calcified, inflammatory, collagenous mass
CLINICAL ISSUES
• No defining clinical symptomatology ○ Low back pain ○ Radicular or nonradicular leg pain ○ Paraparesis ○ Bladder and bowel dysfunction
364
(Left) Axial T2WI MR again shows irregular hypointensity about the margins of the thecal sac st due to dystrophic calcifications. (Right) Axial NECT shows coarse calcifications of the caudal thecal sac st. Also seen is a surgical defect of the left L5 lamina ﬈.
Accelerated Degeneration
KEY FACTS
Complications
TERMINOLOGY
• Accelerated degeneration of disc space/facets at level(s) adjacent to surgical fusion
• Transitional degenerative syndrome, accelerated segmental degeneration, adjacent segment disease
IMAGING
• Degenerative disc/facet changes directly above or below fusion ○ Also occurs adjacent to congenital segmentation
anomalies
• May show increased motion at degenerated level adjacent to fused segment ○ Flexion/extension views for definition of instability
• Plain films most economical way to demonstrate presence of adjacent segment degenerative changes and to serially follow for progression
• MR best identifies soft tissue abnormalities that are occult on plain film
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Disc space infection
• Pseudoarthrosis
• Spondylolysis
• Spondylolisthesis
• Normal postoperative changes
PATHOLOGY
• Produced by altered biophysical stresses from altered normal spinal motion
• Solid fusion alters biomechanics at adjacent mobile levels
• More common with multilevel fusion but also seen following single level fusion
• Presence of osteopenia at time of cervical surgery increases risk of adjacent segment degeneration
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• Pseudoarthrosis if extensive signal abnormality involving anterior and posterior elements in horizontal fashion
(Left) Sagittal graphic shows solid L4-L5 interbody fusion and laminectomy. Note severe disc degeneration at L3-L4 with spondylolisthesis, loss of disc height, osteophytes and central stenosis, and severe degeneration at L5-S1 due to altered biomechanics. (Right) Sagittal T1WI MR shows a solid fusion at C5-C6 with normal fatty marrow signal. There is disc degeneration at C6-C7 with decreased disc height and large disc extrusion compressing cord ſt.
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR shows a patient post C4-C7 fusion with anterior plating giving low signal artifact ﬇. There is a large synovial cyst showing central hyperintensity at the C3-C4 level ſt. (Right) Anteroposterior myelography (left) shows block to contrast at L1-L2 ſt at the upper margin of posterior fusion. Lateral view (right) shows contrast block and severe L1­L2 degeneration ﬇.
365
Postsurgical Deformity
KEY FACTS
TERMINOLOGY
• Deformity: Abnormality of alignment, angulation, or shape of vertebral column following surgery
Complications
○ May be associated with clinically significant findings such
as instability
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Infection
• Tumor
• Degenerative instability
• Isthmic spondylolisthesis
PATHOLOGY
• Risk factors for deformity ○ Age (pediatric at increased risk), number of levels ○ Location of laminectomy ○ Intramedullary disease ○ Facet joint involvement ○ Bone density
(Left) Sagittal NECT shows severe kyphotic deformity at site of anterior fusion ſt at C5-C6 and adjacent segment degeneration ﬇ at C6-C7. There had been prior laminectomy and posterior fusion. (Right) Sagittal NECT shows near normal alignment after 2 stages of surgery. The 1st stage was posterior osteotomies; the 2nd stage was anterior vertebrectomies with strut graft with plate/screws. The 3rd stage was posterior instrumented fusion (not shown).
• Preexisting degenerative disease risk factor for cervical deformity ○ 30% incidence of kyphosis in patients with straight spine
• Thoracolumbar junction ○ Particularly susceptible to deformity
• Spinal deformity reoperation complications as high as 33% ○ Implant failure ○ Adjacent segment degeneration (10%) ○ Pseudoarthrosis
CLINICAL ISSUES
• Surgery for progressive neurological decline, intractable pain, cosmetic appearance
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• Thresholds for optimal correction of adult deformity include sagittal vertical axis < 50 mm, pelvic tilt < 25°, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis < 10°
366
(Left) Sagittal NECT shows severe multilevel spondylolisthesis ſt with multilevel laminectomy defect st. (Right) Sagittal CT shows increased kyphotic angulation in this patient following posterior laminectomy and corpectomy. Note the angulation of the cage with the displacement of the posterior superior margin into the canal ﬇.
Radiation Myelopathy
KEY FACTS
Complications
TERMINOLOGY
• Chronic progressive radiation myelitis
• Delayed radiation myelopathy
IMAGING
• Spindle-shaped cord swelling with irregular, focal rind of enhancement (early)
• Focal cord atrophy (late)
• Clinical signs may reflect longer segment of damage than demonstrated on MR
TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
• Transverse myelitis
• Multiple sclerosis
• Spinal cord infarct
• Astrocytoma
• Syrinx
PATHOLOGY
• Demyelination, lipid-laden microphages, swollen astrocytes, endothelial damage, necrosis, local Ca⁺⁺ deposition, hyalinosis of intramedullary vessel walls
CLINICAL ISSUES
• Onset of progressive numbness and weakness ± sphincter dysfunction 1 month → several years after fractionated radiotherapy
• Relentless progression without significant improvement in most cases
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
• Late focal atrophy at sites of previous enhancement
• Fatty marrow replacement in treatment field provides clue to etiology
• Pathologic cord changes not always visible on MR imaging
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR in a patient following radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma demonstrates abnormal intramedullary T2 hyperintensity in conjunction with fatty marrow replacement, characteristic of postradiation vertebral and spinal cord changes. (Right) Sagittal T1WI C+ MR confirms abnormal spinal cord parenchymal enhancement in the area of greatest radiation myelopathic injury. Note also the marked T1 shortening in the vertebral marrow reflecting fatty replacement.
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR following radiation treatment for melanoma shows extensive radiation myelopathy involving the cervical and thoracic cord with diffuse cord hyperintensity ſt. (Right) Sagittal T1 C+ MR in this patient with extensive radiation myelopathy involving cervical and thoracic cord following treatment for melanoma shows ill-defined mild enhancement of the upper thoracic cord from T1 to T3 ﬈.
367
This page intentionally left blank
SECTION 11
Remote Complications
Remote Complications Overview 370 Donor Site Complications Deep Venous Thrombosis Pulmonary Embolism Aspiration Pneumonia Acute Myocardial Infarction 376 Cerebral Infarction Cerebellar Hemorrhage Intracranial Hypotension Extraaxial Hematoma, Brain Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage 381 Retroperitoneal Lymphocele Ophthalmic Complications Esophageal Perforation Acute Pancreatitis Pseudomembranous Colitis (Clostridium dicile) 386 Rhabdomyolysis Bowel Perforation Ureteral Trauma
372 373 374 375
377 378 379 380
382 383 384 385
387 388 389