Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 679 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
11 Robotic-Assisted Ligation of ThePatent Ductus Arteriosus
https://t.me/medicina_free
73
Fig. 11.7 The assistant helped the surgeon cut the tail line short
were not ligated. The tails of the second line short are also cut off (Fig.11.7). Intrathoracic bleeding was checked, and then the operation was ended.
11.6 Technical Points andSkills
Arranging the operating holes: For small patients, the instruments and mirror hole are placed in the fourth rib gap of the axillary front, the fth rib gap of the axillary midline and the sixth intercos­tal space of the scapular midline. For older chil­dren, the right trocar hole was in the fth rib gap of the scapular midline.
Arterial duct ligation: It is best to tighten the
wire knot at the upper and lower windows of the
PDA.Importantly, the surgeon ensures that the PDA is not pulled or raised.
ceral chest and parietal pleura along the longitudi­nal axis of the aorta and close to the side of the aorta. The purpose of doing this is to make it eas­ier for the assistant to assist the surgeon in expos­ing the PDA.In addition, it can better protect the vagus nerve and recurrent laryngeal nerve.
11.7 Postoperative Complications
Postoperative complications included pneumo­thorax, hoarseness caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and chylothorax. The incidence of postoperative complications is very low.
Exposure PDA: It is best to separate the vis-
74
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. Ying and X. Liu
11.8 Comparisons withConventional Thoracoscopic Surgery
Compared with conventional thoracoscopic sur­gery, the new generation Da Vinci robotic surgery system has advanced characteristics [8, 9]: (1) accurate three-dimensional eld of vision: the ordinary cavity mirror is a two-dimensional plane eld of view, which cannot accurately locate the distance in the two-dimensional eld of view, while the eld of view of robot is a three-dimen­sional eld of view, which simulates human eyes, can see more clearly and locate the distance more accurately; (2) intelligent action: the action of the manipulators hand and wrist can be transformed into accurate mechanical action in real time, which coincides with the action of the knife oper­ation; (3) motion correction and shake ltering function: the degree of bending and rotation of the surgical instrument with a rotatable wrist far exceeds the limit of the human hand. Trembling ltering and intuitive movement can make the doctors’ operation stable and natural; (4) remote control: the operator does not have to go to the operation table to save space; (5) reduce operator fatigue: compared with traditional surgery and endoscopic surgery, good three-dimensional vision, simplied cooperation mode and ergo-
nomically designed doctor consoles can mini­mize doctor fatigue and physical injury.
References
1. Lindsay FE, William BK, Hugh DA, etal. Patent duc­tus arteriosus. Pediatr Rev. 2021;42:632–4.
2. Burak DO, Unal A, Ersin K, etal. Totally endoscopic robotic-assisted cardiac surgery in children. Artif Organs. 2019;43:342–9.
3. Tang ST. Robot-assisted surgery in children: current status and prospects. Chin J Robot Surg. 2021;2:241–7.
4. Zhang SH, Gao ZG, Tou JF, etal. Current plications of robotic procedures in pediatric surgery. J Clin Ped Sur. 2021;20:701–7.
5. Yoshihiro S, Bassem NM, Tomislav M, etal. Totally endoscopic robotic-assisted repair of patent ductus arteriosus and vascular ring in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2309–13.
6. Ying LY, Liu XW, Tan Z, et al. Application of Da Vinci robot assisted endoscopic technique in the tretment of patent ductus arteriosus in children.J Clin Ped Surg. 2021;20:1179–82.
7. Le Bret E, Papadatos S, Folliguet T,et al.et.al. Interruption of PDA in children: robotically assisted versus videothoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:973–6.
8. Li S, Tang ST. Application status and prospects of robotic surgery system in pediatric thoracic surgery. Chin J Robot Surg. 2021;2:272–6.
9. Ying LY, Wang XK, Liu XW, et al. Application of robot-assisted endoscopic technique in the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in 106 children. J Robot Surg.
2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01537-7.
Robotic-Assisted Congenital
https://t.me/medicina_free
Choledochal Cyst Radical Surgery
ZhigangGao andDuoteCai
12
12.1 Introduction
Choledochal cysts are common abnormal dilata­tions of the biliary tree in pediatric surgery [1], and 80% of these cases are diagnosed before the age of 10years. In Asia, the incidence of this dis­ease is as high as 1:1000–13,000, signicantly higher than that in Europe and the United States [24]. In 1995, Farello et al. for the rst time, applied the laparoscopic technique to complete the choledochal cyst radical surgery [5], then in 2002, Li et al. improved this technique to shorten the operative time and decrease the difculty of the surgery [6]. In the following decades, through the unremitting efforts of pediatric surgery col­leagues, laparoscopic radical choledochal cystec­tomy has been gradually applied in major medical centers in China, and in recent years, it has basi­cally replaced the traditional open surgery. There has been a consensus among experts that laparo­scopic technique is superior to traditional open surgery in terms of operative time and periopera­tive complications. However, while laparoscopic technique is still on the rise, da Vinci robotic-
assisted technique is impacting the eld of pedi­atric surgery with the momentum of high-precision technology. Woo et al. performed the rst da Vinci robotic-assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery in 2006 [2], and Wong et al. performed this surgery rstly in China in 2009 [7]. Since then, various hospitals in China have been gradu­ally trying to perform this surgery. Currently, the da Vinci III (da Vinci Si system) and da Vinci IV (da Vinci Xi system) are mostly commonly used in China to perform da Vinci robotic-assisted choledochal cyst surgery. Compared with the da Vinci III, the da Vinci IV has been greatly improved in terms of loading time and intraoper­ative instrument replacement, which effectively shorten the operative time. In clinical practice, the da Vinci IV has gradually replaced the da Vinci IV.Therefore, this chapter will discuss the robotic-assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery based on the da Vinci IV system.
12.2 Indications
andContraindications
Supplementary Information The online version con­tains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 981- 19- 9693- 1_12.
Z. Gao (*) · D. Cai Department of General Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China e-mail: ebwk@zju.edu.cn; cdt1240@zju.edu.cn
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 Q. Shu (ed.), Pediatric Robotic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9693-1_12
The da Vinci technique can theoretically be applied to pediatric choledochal cysts. Previously reported, the da Vinci-assisted Kasai surgery can be performed in neonates up to 4 kg [8]. The youngest child who underwent da Vinci-assisted choledochal cyst surgery in our hospital was 42 days with a weight of 3.5 kg [9]. Compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, there are no
75
76
https://t.me/medicina_free
Z. Gao and D. Cai
absolute contraindications for da Vinci robotic­assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery, but the following relative contraindications should be noticed: (1) unstable vital signs; (2) weight less than 5 kg or age less than 3 months; and (3) severe cardiopulmonary insufciency. For chil­dren with the above- mentioned relative contrain­dications, a careful preoperative discussion by experienced senior clinicians is required to assess the suitability of the da Vinci surgery in terms of the child’s cardiopulmonary tolerance, the degree of abdominal adhesions, the technical level of the surgical team, the probability of transition to open surgery, the economic conditions and the surgery expectations of the family.
12.3 Preoperative Preparation
The preoperative preparation for da Vinci- assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery includes bowel preparation, psychological preparation, blood preparation, and preoperative antibiotic adminis­tration. Bowel preparation includes eating easily digestible food, cleansing enema 24hours before surgery, fasting for 8 hours, and water- free for 2 hours before surgery. On the day of surgery, based on the situation of defecation and abdomi­nal distension, Glycerine enama can be given to make intraoperative intestinal conditions suitable for surgery as much as possible. Psychological preparation includes preoperative doctor-patient communication and nursing education to help the guardians understand the procedure, possible complications and precautions during the periop­erative period, so as to alleviate the anxiety of the family. Regarding blood preparation, with the maturity of choledochal cyst surgery in recent years, intraoperative blood transfusion is rarely required, but due to the risk of large vessel injury in the hilar anatomy, preoperative preparation of red blood cells and plasma is still routinely required. Choledochal cyst surgery requires pre­operative antibiotics and empirical antibiotics should be selected according to whether the child has biliary tract infection and the severity of the infection before the operation. For children with­out infection, the second- or third-generation
cephalosporins can be selected. Preoperative anti­biotics should be administered 30minutes before surgery, intravenously, and titrated within 30min­utes to achieve effective concentrations of antibi­otics in the serum and biliary tract. Depending on the half- life of the selected antibiotics and the length of surgery, the drugs can be administered intraoperatively to ensure that the effective con­centration of drugs covers the entire procedure.
12.4 Position andDocking
Hole position: (1) Make a midline incision (8mm) at the umbilical area to establish a pneu­moperitoneum, insert da Vinci Trocar into the abdomen (Fig.12.1 Point 3). (2) Make a vertical line (Fig.12.1 Line b) to the line connecting the umbilicus and the surface projection point of the hepatic porta (Fig. 12.1 Line a). (3) Mark one point on each side of line b about 8cm from the umbilicus (Fig.12.1 Points 2 & 4 , the distance is at least 3cm), then make 8mm incisions at each point, insert trocar. (4) Make a vertical line at the midpoint of the line connecting the umbilicus and point 4 (Fig.12.1 Line c). (5) Make a 5mm incision at the lower part of the line about 3–5cm from the intersection point (Fig.12.1 Point 5). (6) Insert a standard lumpectomy Trocar for use as an auxiliary hole.
Docking: (1) Adjust the child’s position to a
head-high and foot-low position (note: Unless the da Vinci Xi integrated operating table is con­gured, this step is very important, and the patient’s position cannot be adjusted after instal­lation). (2) Establish the pneumoperitoneum via the umbilical trocar. (3) Set the host “upper abdominal surgery” mode, leave the “arm 1” empty, connect the “arm 3” to the umbilical tro­car, use the main view mirror to determine the surgical eld, press and hold the “targeting” but­ton to adjust the other robotic arms. (4) “Arm 2” and “arm 4” are connected to the trocar at point 2 and point 4 respectively. The operating instru­ments are installed under the main viewer’s supervision. (5) Place the dissector into the trocar at point 2. (6) Place a needle holder or electroco­agulation hook into the trocar at point 4.
ab
12 Robotic-Assisted Congenital Choledochal Cyst Radical Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
77
Fig. 12.1 The layout of the Trocar for da Vinci chole­dochal cyst surgery. (a) The body surface marker points of Trocar; (b) After Trocar placement. Points 3, 2 and 4 are the positions of trocar holes, which are located at the mid­point and both ends of line b, respectively. Point 5 on the
12.5 Surgical Steps
The robotic-assisted choledochal cyst radical sur­gery (4-hole method) consists of the following ve steps:
Step 1 Position and docking (see Position and
docking section for details).
Step 2 Ex vivo jejunal Roux-Y anastomosis: The
operators hold a da Vinci primary viewer, which enters the abdomen via the umbilical da Vinci Trocar to monitor the abdominal cavity. After revealing the Treitz ligament, the opera­tors grasp and control the 20 cm jejunum under the treitz ligament using the 2,4,5 trocar lumpectomy grasping clamp, then turn off the air and close the umbilical trocar. The umbili­cal incision can be enlarged appropriately according to the situation. The jejunum can be dragged out through the umbilicus. The opera­tors complete the jejunal Roux-Y anastomosis invitro.
line c is the auxiliary hole position of standard Trocar. Line a is the line connecting the surface projection point of the hepatic porta and the umbilicus (point 3). Line b is perpendicular to line a, line c is perpendicular to the mid­point of the line connecting points 3 and 4
Step 3 Docking: See position and docking sec-
tion for details.
Step 4 Laparoscopic surgery: The primary sur-
geon controls the robot arm at the surgeon’s console to complete the dissection of the bili­ary tract, the resection of the common bile duct cyst and gallbladder, and the anastomosis of the jejunal biliary branch of the hepatic duct (Fig. 12.2). The assistant, on the operat­ing table, should control the auxiliary grasp­ing forceps, suction or hemolock via the 5 mm Trocar as needed, to help the primary surgeon exposing the surgical eld, passing stitches, and handling stulas, as well as da Vinci oper­ating instrument changes. The main surgeon and assistant need to communicate verbally in a timely manner during surgery, and the main surgeon’s instructions and assistant feedback must be clear and unambiguous.
Step 5 End of surgery: After completing the
biliary- enteric anastomoses, the No. 2 arm should be removed rst, the abdominal drain-
78
MN
KL
https://t.me/medicina_free
DEF
GHI
Z. Gao and D. Cai
J
Fig. 12.2 (a) Disconnection of cystic artery; (b) Dissect gallbladder to the neck; (c) Dissociate the anterior wall of the choledochal cyst; (d) Open the anterior wall of the common bile duct, explore whether there are gallstones, and determine the location of the left and right hepatic ducts; (e) Flush the distal end of the common bile duct to ensure no residual stones; (f) Dissect the distal end of common bile duct; (g) Clipping distal common bile duct by Hemolock; (h) Dissect the posterior wall of chole-
dochal cyst, and pay attention to the operation close to the cyst wall to avoid damage to the portal vein; (i) The proxi­mal end of the choledochal cyst was cut off to expose the opening of the common hepatic duct; (j) Hepaticojejunostomy: from left to right (subject to the left and right sides of the child’s body) continuous suture, fol­lowed by anterior wall and then anterior wall; (k) Knot and check whether there is stenosis or leakage in the anas­tomotic stoma
12 Robotic-Assisted Congenital Choledochal Cyst Radical Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
79
age tube should be left under the anastomosis via the No. 2 Trocar. After shutting off the gas, the No. 3 and No. 4 arm should be removed and the robotic arm should be retrieved, the da Vinci surgical cart should be removed. After washing hands, the main surgeon or the sec­ond assistant should assist the rst assistant in completing the transumbilical extraction of the choledochal cyst and gallbladder and shut­ting off the abdomen.
12.6 Technical Points andSkills
The da Vinci technique brings great advantages to the dissection of choledochal cysts, making it easier to deal with tissue gaps during cyst dissec­tion to reduce side injuries, while the possibility of complete cyst debridement is greatly improved. However, we still believe that intraoperative opening of the anterior cyst wall is necessary which can clarify the presence of stones in the distal cyst. Then we can properly ush the distal end to avoid residual stone obstruction, which may lead to postoperative pancreatitis.
Although the da Vinci robot has many advan­tages, it also has some shortcomings, such as the lack of force feedback and the absence of instru­ments specically for younger children, so clini­cians need to master the following points to compensate the shortcomings and reduce injuries:
1. Body position (Non-da Vinci integrated surgi-
cal bed): The body position should be head­high and foot-low, with the head side elevated by about 15°–30° to give the robotic arm enough space to move during surgery. In addi­tion, most da Vinci robotic devices are not equipped with an integrated surgical bed, and the bed height cannot be adjusted after dock­ing is completed, so the child’s position must be adjusted before docking.
2. Position and Trocar depth in the younger
children: Because of the small abdominal
space in young children, the distance between the right and left abdominal da Vinci Trocar and the umbilicus should be less than 8cm, but must be greater than 3 cm, otherwise there will be a possibility of collision damage to the instrument. Da Vinci Trocar has a total of three black marking lines (one thick and two thin) at the distal end. For older children, the best position of the middle thick line is located in the muscular layer, where the trac­tion force of the Trocars on the muscles dur­ing the rotation of the robotic arm is almost zero and the damage is minimal. However, if the Trocars are placed according to this line in younger children, it will cause the Trocars to be stretched too deep into the abdominal cavity and affect the operation. In this case, the depth of the Trocar can be adjusted by using the most distal thin line at as the boundary of the peritoneum, and the abdomi­nal wall can be elevated by adjusting the mechanical arm to raise the Trocar, thus increasing the abdominal cavity space. Because the abdominal wall muscle layer is thinner in younger children, and the ability to resist pulling is stronger than that of older children and adults, so no abdominal wall injury will occur.
3. Clamping of intestines and stitches: Because of the lack of force feedback and the lack of articial control function of the bite strength of the dissector, the intraoperative action of clamping the intestines should be minimized. If it is necessary to clamp, it is appropriate to clamp the edge of the intestinal wall, which can meet the operation purpose. The surgeon should try not to clamp too much intestinal wall tissue to avoid excessive mechanical bite force and damage. When performing biliary­enteric anastomosis, if continuous sutures are used, the risk of thread breakage is greater than that of traditional laparoscopic surgery for the same reasons mentioned above. It will affect the operation process and requires attention.
80
https://t.me/medicina_free
Z. Gao and D. Cai
12.7 Post-Operative Complications
The complications after da Vinci-assisted chole­dochal radical cyst surgery are basically the same as laparoscopic choledochal cyst radical surgery, including postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, leaky gut, anastomotic stricture, pancreatitis, liver function abnormalities, intestinal adhesions and intestinal obstruction, and intra-abdominal hernia.
1. Postoperative bleeding: The da Vinci robot’s
three-dimensional magnication imaging sys­tem, jitter-ltering function, and multidegree­of- freedom rotatable manipulator will enable better vascular handling during surgery and low incidence of postoperative bleeding. However, for older children with large cysts, heavy biliary tract infections, and multiple vascular growths in the cyst wall, there is a higher risk of postoperative bleeding from the peeled surface. For postoperative bleed­ing, it is necessary to determine whether there is active bleeding and decide whether to surgically stop the bleeding. For children treated conservatively, in addition to transfu­sion therapy, adequate drainage can avoid the formation of encapsulated effusion and abdominal abscess. For children with non­acute but persistent bleeding and ineffective conservative treatment, reoperation may be considered, and laparoscopic exploration may be recommended if abdominal condi­tions allow.
2. Bile leakage: The da Vinci robotic-assisted
choledochal cyst radical surgery is better than laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of bili­aryenteric anastomoses less than 5 mm in diameter, but there is still the possibility of bile leakage, commonly due to poor anasto­motic alignment, local ischemia of the anasto­mosis, and high anastomotic tension. The clinical manifestation is the bile-like uid draining from the abdominal cavity. Most children with bile leakage can heal on their own if the leakage is well drained. However,
due to excessively large leakage or poor drain­age, a few of them will have peritoneal effu­sion or peritonitis, fever, abdominal pain, and other symptoms of abdominal infection. For children with large amount of peritoneal bile­like drainage uid after surgery and ineffec­tive conservative treatment, reoperation is required. For children with signs of peritoni­tis, reoperation is required. For children with encapsulated effusion in the abdominal cavity, puncture and external drainage of the effusion can be performed under B-ultrasound local­ization. Most of the encapsulated effusion can be improved after external drainage, while a small number of children with poor effects after external drainage need reoperation.
3. Leaky gut: Leaky gut is rare clinically, most of leaky gut are caused by anastomotic needle leakage during jejunal Roux-Y anastomosis, while a few are caused by intestinal injury due to improper instrumentation. For children with mild pneumoperitoneum after surgery, if there are no abdominal symptoms, it is neces­sary to consider that CO2 is not discharged as much as possible during the surgery, and the change of the disease should be closely observed without immediate surgical investi­gation. However, for those with intestinal con­tents or fecal uid draining from the abdominal drainage tube, immediate surgical investiga­tion is required regardless of the presence of physical signs.
4. Anastomotic stricture: Anastomotic stricture mostly occurs between four months and one year after surgery. The earliest clinical manifestations are mostly liver function abnormalities, and a small number of children may present with jaundice and white stools. Anastomotic stricture can be diagnosed using B ultrasound and MRCP. For children with anastomotic stricture, reoperation can be attempted with da Vinci or laparoscopic tech­niques. In our hospital, we have completed four da Vinci- assisted and six laparoscopic surgeries, and there are no cases of transition­ing to open- abdomen surgery. The anasto­motic stricture can be disconnected and
12 Robotic-Assisted Congenital Choledochal Cyst Radical Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
81
re-anastomosed, or the distal and proximal lateral anastomosis of the stricture can be per­formed, and the surgical results are satisfactory.
5. Pancreatitis: In the clinic, post-surgical pan­creatitis is rare, and common causes of pan­creatitis include intraoperative pancreatic injury or residual protein bolus distal to the cyst. Pancreatic injury is mostly related to the management of the distal opening of the cho­ledochal cyst. Excessive dissection of the dis­tal opening will inevitably increase the risk of pancreatic tissue damage. However, inade­quate dissection of the distal opening and excessive residuals will increase the risk of postoperative bile duct stump carcinogenesis. The da Vinci has signicant advantages in dis­secting the distal opening of the choledochal cyst. For postsurgical pancreatitis, conserva­tive treatment is the mainstay. Children with obvious tenderness on the umbilical region and elevated blood and urine amylase need to be fasted and treated with Stilamin pumping. For children with no abdominal signs and blood amylase below 200 U/L, under the premise of exclusion of pancreatic gallstones, there is no need for excessive intervention and can be followed up regularly.
6. Liver function abnormalities: Liver function abnormalities within 1–2weeks after surgery are mostly related to preoperative preexisting liver injury, which can be improved after con­servative liver protection treatment. Four months after surgery, children with abnormal liver function (elevated glutamine transferase) need to be aware of the possibility of anasto­motic stenosis.
7. Intestinal adhesions and intestinal obstruc­tion: Intestinal adhesions and intestinal obstruction are common complications after conventional abdominal surgery and less common after da Vinci-assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery. They are mainly seen in children with high bile leakage during surgery or bile-intestinal leakage after surgery. Intestinal adhesions and intestinal obstruction have the risk of forming intra-abdominal her-
nia and intestinal strangulation complications. Thus, clinical differential diagnosis and parental education should be done at the time of diagnosis. The serious complications should be dealt with in time to reduce the risk of life-threatening intestinal strangulation or necrosis.
12.8 Comparisons withConventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Compared with conventional laparoscopic chole­dochal cyst radical surgery, the da Vinci robotic­assisted surgery has the following advantages: (1) fewer injuries during biliary dissection; (2) more reliable management of the distal opening of the cyst; (3) more suitable for biliary-enteric anastomosis less than 5mm in diameter; and (4) faster postoperative recovery and shorter length of hospital stay.
The dissection of the posterior wall adhesions of the choledochal cyst and the management of the proliferating vessels of the cyst wall are the main factors that inuence whether to transition to open surgery and the amount of bleeding dur­ing the procedure. The da Vinci technique is bet­ter than conventional laparoscopic surgery in dissecting the posterior wall adherent of chole­dochal cysts and proliferating cystic vessels, with lower probability of transition to open surgery and less intraoperative bleeding.
When dealing with the distal opening of the choledochal cyst, removing as much tissue as possible from the cystic wall of the choledochus and closing the stump by ligation or suture can reduce the risk of distant postoperative carcino­genesis. The da Vinci technique will make it eas­ier to visualize and manage the distal opening of the common bile duct cyst during the surgery.
In laparoscopic operations, biliary-enteric anastomosis is extremely challenging in the diameter less than 5 mm. Even surgeons who have completed the laparoscopic learning curve will still be anxious due to unclear vision and unsatisfactory needle insertion angle.
82
https://t.me/medicina_free
Z. Gao and D. Cai
Furthermore, the risk of postoperative anasto­motic leakage or stricture will increase. Thanks to da Vinci’s outstanding magnication imaging system and precise multi-angle rotating manipu­lator system, the operating experience and satis­faction with the anastomosis reported by surgeons are better than that of laparoscopic surgery for anastomoses less than 5mm in diameter.
The postoperative abdominal drainage and the length of postoperative hospital stay directly reect the postoperative recovery of the child, and also indirectly reect the delicacy of the sur­gery. The amount of postoperative abdominal drainage in the da Vinci group was signicantly less than that in the laparoscopic group, which may be related to less exudation from the surgical wound in the da Vinci group. Discomfort com­plaints, such as mild abdominal pain and wound pain, were less frequent in children after da Vinci robotic-assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery than in laparoscopic surgery, which may be related to signicant less stretching of the abdom­inal wall layers by manipulation of the da Vinci Trocar via a robotic arm. The length of hospital stay after da Vinci robotic-assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery is also shorter than that of laparoscopic surgery.
Compared with laparoscopic surgery, da Vinci surgery also has disadvantages: (1) the hospital­ization cost is signicantly higher than that of laparoscopy, and (2) the da Vinci surgery takes longer operative time.
The high cost of da Vinci robotic-assisted sur­gery is currently the biggest obstacle to the rou­tine clinical implementation of this technology [10, 11]. The total per capita cost of hospitaliza­tion for children undergoing da Vinci robotic­assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery is much higher than that of conventional laparoscopic sur­gery, and more than half of the cost still needs to be paid by parents. Therefore, with the current maturity of laparoscopic surgery, parental accep­tance of da Vinci technology is much lower than that of laparoscopic technology when it was newly introduced. It can be foreseen that the eld of da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery is a new tech­nological high ground that pediatric surgeons need to seize in the next few years. However, how
to screen patients and carry out the correspond­ing procedure still needs to be in line with medi­cal ethics. First of all, doctors should be familiar with the characteristics of the disease, while con­sidering the economic situation of the patient’s family, so as to develop appropriate surgical indi­cations, fully reecting the value of the ne and precise da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery. Doctors should neither be afraid to recommend the da Vinci procedure to suitable patients nor blindly pursue the numbers of surgery, and only in this way can they better promote the application of da Vinci technology in the treatment of choledochal cyst.
The operative time of da Vinci robotic-assisted choledochal cyst radical surgery is signicantly longer than that of conventional laparoscopic sur­gery. This is mainly because the loading time of da Vinci is longer than the connection time of laparoscopic instruments. However, compared with the previous model, the loading time has been signicantly optimized (the loading time of da Vinci Si is about 40–60 minutes, while the loading time of da Vinci Xi is about 15–20min­utes), which greatly shortens the operation time. With the rapid development of articial intelli­gence and mechanical engineering, greater improvements and updates are expected in the next generation models.
References
1. Gao ZG, Zhang YB, Cai DT, et al. Complications of laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision: a report of 205 cases. J Clin Ped Sur. 2017;16:65–9 (in Chinese).
2. Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16:179–83.
3. Pham HD, Okata Y, Vu HM, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children: early experi­ence at Vietnam National Children’s Hospital. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35:1211–6.
4. Narayanan SK, Chen Y, Narasimhan KL, et al. Hepaticoduodenostomy versus hepaticojejunos­tomy after resection of choledochal cyst: a sys­tematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:2336–42.
5. Farello GA, Cerofolini A, Rebonato M, et al. Congenital choledochal cyst: video-guided lapa-