Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 679 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
166
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. Tao and H. Zhou
caused by insufcient laparoscopic anastomo­sis, postoperative anastomotic edema, fading urine extravasation or internal stent blockage and displacement. Good laparoscopic anasto­mosis, unobstructed internal stent drainage, and indwelling catheters to maintain bladder low pressure drainage to prevent reux can reduce urinary leakage. If postoperative uri­nary leakage persists, the possibility of ure­teral blockage and stent tube displacement should be considered. If necessary, internal stent tube replacement or nephrostomy should be performed, and nutrition should be strengthened to promote wound healing. Generally, improvement can be achieved after 1-2 weeks.
6. Anastomotic stenosis usually occurs in the early learning curve stage of the surgeon because the operation of suture technology is not skilled, the principle of longitudinal and transverse ureteral suture is not adopted, and postoperative drainage is not smooth, result­ing in repeated urinary tract infection, anasto­motic edema, ischemia, and inammatory hyperplasia. Skilled suture techniques can avoid clamping and pulling the anastomotic tissue during the suture process, and the prin­ciple of longitudinal and transverse suture can ensure spacious and smooth, good blood sup­ply and no tension anastomosis, which can reduce the risk of anastomotic restenosis.
24.8 Comparisons with
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
The Da Vinci robotic system facilitates many complex laparoscopic operations [8]. Robot­assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is the most popular. It was previously reported by Binder et al. in 2002, and there were many similar reports later. Similar reports have been reported in infants and young children. All these reports have fully veried the feasibility of this technique. Its surgi­cal indications and principles are the same as those of conventional laparoscopic surgery, and it has certain advantages in the accuracy, time and
postoperative recovery of anastomosis [9, 10]. The main disadvantage of robotic surgery is the high cost, usually three times that of traditional laparoscopic surgery [11].
24.9 Case Introduction and Operation Video
Figures 24.124.3
References
1. Cao H, Zhou H, Liu K, etal. A modied technique of paraumbilical three-port laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for infants and children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32:1037–45.
2. Huang Y, Wu Y, Shan W, etal. An updated metaanaly­sis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ure­teropelvic junction obstruction in children. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:4922–31.
3. Boysen WR.Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, out­comes, complications, and special considerations in infants. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33:925–35.
4. Liu D, Zhou H, Ma L, etal. Comparison of laparo­scopic approaches for dismembered Pyeloplasty in children with Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: critical analysis of 11-year experiences in a single surgeon. Urology. 2017;101:50–5.
5. Andol C, Adamic B, Oommen J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy? World J Urol. 2020;38:1827–33.
6. Kawal T, Sahadev R, Srinivasan A, etal. Robotic sur­gery in infants and children: an argument for smaller and fewer incisions. World J Urol. 2020;38:1835–40.
7. Bowen DK, Yerkes EB, Lindgren BW, etal. Delayed presentation of Ureteropelvic junction obstruction and loss of renal function after initially mild (SFU grade 1–2) Hydronephrosis. Urology. 2015;86:168–70.
8. Suda K, Koga H, Okawada M, etal. The effect of preoperative urinary tract infection on postoperative renal function in prenatally diagnosed ureteropelvic junction obstruction: indications for the timing of pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:2068–70.
9. Blanc T, Kohaut J, Elie C, et al. Retroperitoneal approach for Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: encouraging preliminary results with robot-assisted laparoscopic repair. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:209.
10. Yang K, Yao L, Li X, etal. A modied suture tech­nique for Transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Pyeloplasty of Pelviureteric junction obstruction. Urology. 2015;85:263–7.
11. Sun L, Zhao D, Shen Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young chil­dren. Asian J Surg. 2023;46:868–73.
Robot-Assisted Ureterovesical
https://t.me/medicina_free
Replantation
GuangjieChen andHuixiaZhou
25
25.1 Introduction
With the rapid development of science and tech­nology, surgery has entered the minimally inva­sive era. However, in the eld of child urinary surgery, some more complex laparoscopic surgi­cal reconstructions (such as ureter replantation) have high technical requirements and long learn­ing curves, and many doctors can not success­fully navigate the learning curve and give up, which makes laparoscopic surgery unable to serve patients universally. Even after the learning curve, surgeons are often in an awkward position during these complicated operations. Many sur­geons suffer from chronic repetitive strain inju­ries to bones and muscles. A surgeon who spent years mastering laparoscopy soon had to scale back or even abandon it because of bone and muscle strain . Since robot-assisted laparoscopic
Supplementary Information The online version con­tains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/
10.1007/978- 981- 19- 9693- 1_25.
G. Chen (*) Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China e-mail: dr.chenguangjie@zju.edu.cn
H. Zhou Department of Urology, Bayi Children’s Hospital Afliated of the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
surgery was proposed in the late 1990s, it has overcome the technical defects of traditional lap­aroscopic surgery due to its advantages such as a 3D surgical eld, 15× magnication effect, 7 degrees of mobility, and tremor ltering, and has been rapidly developed and applied in the surgi­cal eld [1]. This chapter focuses on the applica­tion of robot- assisted ureterovesical replantation, for the treatment of diseases such as vesicoure­teral reux (VUR), ureterovesical junction obstruction, ectopic ureteral opening, bladder diverticulum. This chapter will provide an over­view of robotic-assisted ureterovesical replanta­tion for VUR treatment in children.
25.2 Indications
andContraindications
25.2.1 Indications
(1) Ureteral stenosis or occlusional obstruction
(stenosis or obstruction segment < 3 cm) caused by various reasons below the pelvic cavity: congenital lower ureteral stenosis, non iatrogenic traumatic stenosis, iatrogenic traumatic stenosis (mostly caused by pelvic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology or endoscopic surgery, etc.), inammatory or tuberculous stenosis.
(2) Ectopic ureteral opening (when the renal
function of displaced ureter drainage is
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 Q. Shu (ed.), Pediatric Robotic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9693-1_25
167
168
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Chen and H. Zhou
good), ureterovaginal stula, or vesicovagi­nal stula near the ureterovesical junction.
(3) Ureteral cysts and partial obstructive
megaureter.
(4) Lower ureteral calculi after failure of conser-
vative treatment or endoscopic treatment.
(5) High-grade VUR that failed to spontane-
ously resolve at the age of 5 years old or recurrent febrile UTI.
(6) Symptomatic congenital paraureteral blad-
der diverticulum.
25.2.2 Contraindications
The obstruction of ureteral bladder junction caused by lower ureteral tumor or bladder tumor is contraindicated for this technique. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction and urinary tract infection must be treated before surgery. Low bladder vol­ume caused by pelvic chemotherapy is also a relative contraindication.
der bags will be xed in the patients with opera­tion bed (avoid head low, moves down), neck soft dressings paste, small tripod protect the patient's face (avoid collision intraoperative mechanical arm head).
Docking: An open Hassan technique is used for placement of umbilical camera trocar, fol­lowed by two 8-mm robotic trocars and a 5-mm assistant port placed under direct vision (the dis­tance between operating port and pubic symphy­sis should be more than 10 cm, to ensure the robot surgery have enough wide eld of vision, and operating space), The two arm ports are located at about 6 cm horizontally outside the camera ports (the contralateral robotic arm port can be appropriately outward and downward adjustment).The assistant port was placed about 3 cm above the midpoint of the connection between the ipsilateral surgical port and the cam­era port (Figs.25.1 and 25.2) [24].
25.3 Preoperative Preparation
Laboratory tests include routine blood and urine tests, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, blood glucose, and coagulation function. Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity tests are required for coinfected patients. Imaging exami­nations included abdominal ultrasound, chest radiographs, and preoperative IVU or retrograde pyelography to determine the location and degree of the stenosis. Abdominal or pelvic CT or MRI was performed to exclude external pressure lesions. In patients with a history of pelvic sur­gery or chemotherapy, preoperative cystoscopy can determine bladder volume. For patients with vesicoureteral reux, preoperative urodynamic examination is also feasible.
25.4 Position andDocking
Position: After general anesthesia, a urethral catheter in the sterile eld the patient with supine position with low head and high feet, the shoul-
Fig. 25.1 Take the umbilicus as camera port (C) and the two arm ports are located at about 6 cm horizontally out­side the camera ports, the assistant port (A) was placed about 3 cm above the midpoint of the connection between the ipsilateral surgical port and the camera port
ab
cd
25 Robot-Assisted Ureterovesical Replantation
https://t.me/medicina_free
169
Fig. 25.2 (a) Dissection of the ureter to the uretero- vesical junction (the peritoneum opened between the uterine artery and the lateral wall of the bladder). (b) The course of the ureter along the posterior wall of the
25.5 Surgical Procedures
bladder is identied and marked for a distance of 3–5 cm. (c) The submucosal tunnel is complete. (d) The detrusor reapproximated using interrupted 3-0 absorb­able suture
wall. The tunnel length, which depends on ureter size, is generally 3-5 cm. In the pro-
(1) Open the lateral peritoneum at the location of
the external iliac artery, nd the ureter and dissect as far as possible downward along the ureter until the ureterovesical junction. For girl, the peritoneum should be opened between the uterine artery and the lateral wall of the bladder, and then the ureter should be dissected to the ureterovesical junction. For boys, the peritoneum should be opened between the Vas deferens and the lateral wall of the bladder.
(2) The tunnel route was marked on the surface
of the posterior wall of the bladder along the ureter end toward the anterior abdominal
cess of building the bladder tunnel, attention should be given to properly lling the blad­der and maintain proper tension. Scissors were used to cut the detrusor muscle deep into the bladder mucosa. During this process, attention should be paid to cutting the detru­sor muscle ber bundle along a line to com­pletely separate the detrusor muscle from the mucosa, while minimizing the damage to the detrusor muscle and its nerve bers. The width of the tunnel is determined by the diameter of the ureter, which is generally
1.2–1.5cm. During the incision of the detru­sor of the bladder, attention should be given
170
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Chen and H. Zhou
to the distribution of blood vessels. If the blood vessels cannot be avoided, bipolar cau­tery is recommended for hemostasis. When the detrusor bundle is completely separated, the bladder mucosa can be seen to protrude evenly and form a dome, without residual detrusor bers on the mucosal surface, indi­cating that the established tunnel is up to standard. Tunneling is best done proximal to distal. Damage to the bladder mucosa can be avoided in the process of tunnel construction unless the bladder wall is hypertrophic and accompanied by signicant trabecular growth. If the mucosa is damaged inadver­tently, the damaged area can be repaired with gure-of-eight suture.
(3) After the tunnel is well established, the blad-
der pressure should be reduced to facilitate the detrusor suturing. The ureter should be sutured in a tension-free state. The detrusor can be sutured using 3-0 absorbable discon­tinuous sutures. Suturing usually begins at the beginning of the ureter, and a small ure­teral membrane can be sutured during sutur­ing to make the tunnel more stable [47].
25.6 Technical Points andSkills
The key step in ureteral bladder reimplantation involves establishing a long and wide submuscu­lar tunnel to embed the ureter and ensure that the ureter is anastomosed to the bladder without tor­sion or an angle. When establishing the tunnel under the detrusor, the detrusor should be cut into the mucosal layer as far as possible, and the tun­nel should be sufciently long and wide. When suturing the detrusor, it is recommended to use interrupted sutures, and at the same time, the detrusor can be sutured with the ureter adventitia to prevent ureter retraction and torsion.
25.7 Postoperative Complications
25.7.1 Early Complications
25.7.1.1 Persistent Reux
In patients with severe reux before surgery, per­sistent reux is more common after surgery, but the grade of reux tends to be low. Most postop­erative low-grade reux will spontaneously sub­side, which may be related to the improvement of inammation and function in the bladder during the early stage after surgery.
25.7.1.2 Contralateral Reux
For contralateral reux after surgery, the relevant literature indicates that there is no signicant dif­ference between different surgical techniques, but the grade of ipsilateral corrected reux is a risk factor for contralateral reux. The higher the grade of ipsilateral corrected reux, the higher the grade of contralateral reux. Management of contralateral reux: most patients without obvi­ous clinical symptoms can be closely observed, and a few patients need intervention and control of pyelonephritis. For asymptomatic children under 4–5 years of age, contralateral reux can be treated with prophylactic antibiotics. If the child remains asymptomatic and infection-free, repeat VCUG testing is not necessary because contralateral reux will resolve spontaneously in most patients.
25.7.1.3 Obstruction
Early after reux surgery, transient terminal ure­teral obstruction is often present, with mild hydronephrosis and ureteral dilatation on ultra­sound. The problem will ease over time. Acute postoperative ureteral terminal obstruction may be associated with compression caused by sub­mucosal hematoma or edema at the suture site, or may be associated with distortion or kinking of
25 Robot-Assisted Ureterovesical Replantation
https://t.me/medicina_free
171
the ureter in the new tunnel. Most patients have no clinical symptoms, and some patients present with acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Postoperative urinary tract infections are rare, but when they do occur they are often accompanied by severe terminal ureteral obstruction. If the end of the ureter is obstructed after surgery, it can be resolved by retrograde insertion of a double “J” stent or percutaneous nephrostomy. Most cases do not require further surgery.
25.7.2 Long-Term Complications
25.7.2.1 Obstruction
Progressive ureter dilatation and hydronephrosis after vesicoureteral replantation can be caused by a variety of factors and can be classied accord­ing to the site of obstruction
Hiatus
The obstruction point is located at the hiatus where the ureter enters the bladder. Most com­monly, the hiatus is located too close to the abdominal wall due to a small bladder capacity or a long tunnel, so that when the bladder is full, the ureter pulls toward the abdominal wall, resulting in a phenomenon called “high ureteral reinstalla­tion.” When the bladder is not full, the ureter empties well, and most of this situation resolves on its own.
Tunnel
Inadequate submucosal tunnel establishment may compress the ureter in the tunnel, leading to ureteral obstruction. When detrusor muscle hypertrophy and trabecular hyperplasia are evi­dent, establishing a smooth, wide submucosal tunnel can be quite challenging. Ischemia of the ureteral and submucosal tunnels is another important factor leading to ureteral obstruction.
Persistent Reux
For patients with low-grade vesicoureteral reux, the success rate of anti-reux surgery is very high, and surgical failure is very rare. Most oper­ations fail because severe vesicoureteral reux persists after surgery. A short tunnel or large ure­teral diameter without ureteral cutting is an important factor for surgical failure. Another important factor in the persistence of postopera­tive reux is the failure to identify secondary reux before surgery, such as vesicoureteral reux associated with neurogenic bladder. In these patients, reux is secondary to bladder dys­function, and these problems need to be addressed before surgery. In most cases, improved bladder function results in spontaneous resolution of residual postoperative reux [6, 814].
25.8 Comparisons
withConventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Traditional laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir cystoure­thral reimplantation has been limited in its wide application in recent decades due to its high requirements for dissection, suturing, and knot­ting techniques. The introduction of robotic sur­gical systems has made ureter dissection and suture techniques simple and feasible, greatly shortening the learning curve and enabling urolo­gists in most hospitals with robotic surgical sys­tems to perform this procedure [810, 12, 14].
1. Compared with the traditional laparoscope,
the three-dimensional magnied eld of vision of the robot system is clearer and has higher resolution. It can maintain lens clarity for a long time without being affected by smoke, which guarantees a smooth surgical process.
172
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Chen and H. Zhou
2. The highly exible robotic arm system can complete difcult operations such as grasp­ing, holding, hemostasis, suturing, and liga­tion in a narrow space, which cannot be achieved by laparoscopic instruments and human hands. Moreover, the robot system can lter the shaking of human hands, reduce the fatigue of surgeons, and reduce misoperation.
3. The learning curve of the robot system for dif­cult surgery is signicantly lower than that of traditional laparoscopy, and doctors with certain experience in laparoscopic surgery can quickly adapt to surgical operations.
4. Similar to the traditional laparoscopic system, all operations of the robot system rely on the eld of vision provided by the primary lens. If the eld of vision is polluted or massive bleeding cannot expose the operating eld, the robot system cannot replace open surgery.
5. The robotic arm of the robot system will occupy a certain space, and the selection and operation space of the assistant hole will be more limited than that of the traditional laparoscope.
References
1. Li Z, Song HC. Robotic-assisted procedures in pediat­ric urology. Chin J Pediatr Surg. 2021;8:764−9.
2. Passoni N, Peters CA. Robotic Ureteral Reimplantation. J Endourol. 2020;34:S31−4.
3. Cannon GM, Ost MC. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary
Vesicoureteral Reux in Children. J Urol. 2017;197:1379−81.
4. Zhu W, Zhou H, Li P et al. Comparison of clinical efcacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir procedure and gas-bladder laparoscopic Cohen ure­teral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reux. J Clinic Pediatr Surg. 2022;5:437−44.
5. Zhu W, Zhou H, Cao H, et al. Modied technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic infantile ureteral reim­plantation for obstructive megaureter. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57:1011−7.
6. Gerber JA, Koh CJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ure­teral reimplantation in children: a valuable alternative to open surgery. World J Urol. 2020;38:1849−54.
7. Koehne E, Desai S, Lindgren B, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic diverticulectomy with ureteral reimplan­tation. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16:508−09.
8. Deng T, Liu B, Luo L, et al. Robot-assisted laparo­scopic versus open ureteral reimplantation for pedi­atric vesicoureteral reux: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2018;36:819−28.
9. Carbonara U, Branche B, Cisu T, et al. Robot­Assisted Ureteral Reimplantation: A Single-Center Comparative Study. J Endourol. 2021;35:1504−11.
10. Fan G, Li K, Wang Y. Efcacy and safety of robot­assisted laparoscopic, laparoscopic and open surgery in ureteral reimplantation: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. Updates Surg 2022;74:1491–9.
11. Smith RP, Oliver JL, Peters CA. Pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2011;185:1876–81.
12. Chalmers D, Herbst K, Kim C.Robotic-assisted lapa­roscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an ini­tial experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8:268–71.
13. Akhavan A, Avery D, Lendvay TS. Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: Outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:864–8.
14. Grimsby G, Dwyer M, Jacobs M, et al. Multi­institutional review of outcomes of robotic assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation. J Urol. 2015;193:1791–5.
Robotic-Assisted Prostatic
https://t.me/medicina_free
Cystectomy andSeminal Reconstruction for Prostatic Utricle Cyst
26
26.1 Introduction
Prostatic utricle cyst is a complication of severe hypospadias, and it has been reported that the incidence of perineal and scrotal hypospadias is 10–15% [1, 2]. Prostatic utricle cyst may be the consequence of paramesonephrosis or hypomas­culinization of the urinary sinus. It opens in the posterior wall of the prostatic urethra and may cause infection, orchiepididymitis, stones, etc. [3] and may also affect ureteral catheterization. VCUG can be detected, and ultrasound and CT can provide a clear location [4]. Treatment can­not be given for lack of symptoms. If recurrent urogenital tract infection is present, surgery should be performed [5]. The surgical methods can be divided into open resection and laparo­scopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic resection, but the previous surgery often required simulta­neous amputation of both vas deferens [6, 7]. The extensive development of robotic surgery, espe-
cially pelvic surgery, which has great advantages. Surgeons have begun to try to perform seminal reconstruction at the same time as prostatic utri­cle cyst resection [8].
26.2 Indications
andContraindications
Asymptomatic prostatic utricle cyst may not need surgical intervention, but if repeated urinary tract infections, recurrent orchiepididymitis, or compression symptoms of large cysts are present, surgery may be considered.
There are generally no obvious contraindica­tions to surgery unless vital signs are unstable. Relative contraindications include a history of pelvic surgery and underweight (<5 kg), or younger than 6 months. Prostatic utricle cysts that are too small (long diameter of <2.5 cm), will increase the difculty of reconstruction, and can also be considered as a relative contraindication.
Supplementary Information The online version con­tains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/
10.1007/978- 981- 19- 9693- 1_26.
C. Tao (*) · Z. Xu Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China e-mail: dr.taoc777@zju.edu.cn;
dr.xuzheming@zju.edu.cn
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 Q. Shu (ed.), Pediatric Robotic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9693-1_26
26.3 Preoperative Preparation
If there was a urinary tract infection, the infection was controlled for 2weeks before surgery.
Laboratory tests included routine hematuria, coagulation function, liver and kidney function, etc. Imaging tests include abdominal and urinary B-ultrasound, VCUG, CT, etc. No operation con-
traindications were found after anesthesia
https://t.me/medicina_free
consultation.
Bowel preparation included cleansing enema 24 h before surgery, fasting for 8h, and being water-free for 2h before surgery.
Preoperative antibiotics should be adminis­tered intravenously 30min before surgery.
Depending on the half-life of the selected anti­biotics and the length of surgery, the drugs can be administered intraoperatively to ensure that the effective concentration of drugs covers the entire procedure.
26.4 Position andDocking
Position: after general anesthesia, a urethral catheter was placed in the sterile eld. The patient was in the supine position with a low head and high feet, and the shoulder bags were xed in the patient’s opera­tion bed (avoid head being low and downward movement); neck soft dressing paste and small tri­pod to protect the patient’s face (avoid collision with the intraoperative mechanical arm head).
Docking: an open Hasson technique is used for transperitoneal placement of an 8 mm umbilical camera trocar (Fig.26.1, point C), followed by two 8mm robotic trocars (Fig.26.1, point 1, 2) and a 5 mm assistant port placed under direct vision (Fig. 26.1). The distance between the operating port and pubic symphysis should be more than 6cm to ensure that the robot surgery has a suf­ciently wide eld of vision and operating space. The assistant port was placed about 3cm above the midpoint of the connection between the ipsilateral surgical port and the camera port.
Fig. 26.1 Layout of the trocar for robotic-assisted laparo­scopic prostatic cystectomy and seminal reconstruction
26.5 Surgical Steps
1. Position and docking (see Position and Docking section for details).
2. The urethra is examined by cystoscopy at a lithotomy position, and, if possible, the posi­tion and size of the prostatic utricle cyst are determined and an indwelling catheter is placed under cystoscopy guidance.
3. Supine position with low head and high feet, with needle and thread through the anterior abdominal wall, and then through the anterior
wall of the bladder and out of the abdominal
https://t.me/medicina_free
wall on the other side (Fig.26.2a), pulling the bladder, exposing the surgical area behind the bladder (Fig.26.2b).
4. The pelvic oor peritoneum was opened, and prostatic utricle cyst along the bilateral vas deferens was identied. The anterior and pos­terior walls of the prostatic utricle cyst were mobilized and exposed, and the rectum and ureter were avoided (Fig.26.2c).
5. Dissociate the lateral wall of the prostatic utri­cle cyst and separate the vas deferens from the prostatic utricle cyst. When the prostatic utri­cle cyst and vas deferens are clearly exposed (Fig.26.2d), the anterior wall was cut to clar­ify the position of the vas deferens in the pros­tatic utricle cyst.
6. The top of the prostatic utricle cyst is sepa­rated, and the opening of the vas deferens is
retained (Fig. 26.2e). The main body off the prostatic utricle cyst was fully dissoci­ated (Fig.26.2f); the neck of the prostatic utricle cyst was cut off near the urethra; the proximal stump was retained at about
0.5cm, and the center section was removed (Fig.26.2g).
7. The proximal stump and the distal stump con­nected with the vas deferens can be sutured continuously with 6-0 Biosyn (Fig. 26.2h). The rst stitch located at 6 o’clock is continu­ously sutured to the left half circle, and the second stitch located at 6 o’clock is continu­ously sutured to the right half circle (Fig.26.2i). The knot can be tied at 12 o’clock (Fig. 26.2j). After ushing the wound and achieving hemostasis, a drainage tube is placed on the wound, and then the broken peritoneum was closed (Fig.26.2k).