Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 598 - файл
.pdf
28
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Obi and A. L. Lightner
complex perianal stulas in CD.MSCs are injected into the stula tract walls after
curettage of the internal opening. After 24weeks, closure of all external opening
without any additional collections was note in 51% of treated patients compared to
36% in the control group (p=0.021). Adverse events again remained fairly mild and
similar to previously reported complications. At 54weeks follow-up, the efcacy
and safety proles remained similar [114, 115]. Out of Mayo Clinic, the STOMP
trial recently found that MSCs could effectively be utilized in a bioabsorbable
matrix in the setting of simple stulas and another phase I study found that stula
plugs coated with MSCs could also promote signicantly high healing rates [116,
117]. These phase I, II, and III trials have provided signicant promising results in
regards to expanding treatment options for patients who otherwise had limited to no
other options for clinical improvement. While impactful, these early studies have
largely excluded patients with active proctitis, 3 or more tracts, anal canal involvement, prior diversion, or vaginal or pouch. Recently submitted phase IB/IIA RCT
data in this more severe patient population found at 1year, clinical and radiographic
healing in 70% of perianal, 37.5% of rectovaginal, and 46.2% of ileal pouch stulas
without any signicant treatment- related adverse effects [118]. As such, MSCs are
continuing to demonstrate signicant effectiveness in the treatment of perianal stulizing CD.As more research continues to be done and cost- effectiveness continues to be examined, this treatment option is likely to become less investigational and
more widely spread amongst medical practitioners (Fig.2.7).
Fig. 2.7 Injection of MSCs directly into the rectal mucosa around a stula opening as well as
along the stula tract. (Adapted from Georgiev-Hristov etal. [119])

2 Surgical vs Medical Management of Symptomatic Anal Fistulas in Patients…
https://t.me/medicina_free
29
Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC™)
In 2006, Moy etal. described the rst use of a laser, specically a carbon dioxide
laser, in the successful treatment of perianal stula in CD patients [120]. Subsequently
in 2011, Wilhelm etal. described a new technique with a radial- emitting laser probe
[Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™), Biolitec AG, Jena, Germany] that works by
destroying the epithelium of the stula tract despite lack of direct visualization of
the pathway [121]. Closure of the internal opening with an endorectal advancement
ap was also described. Initial studies demonstrated an overall healing rate of 64%
of all stula patients and 69% in specically CD patients. This rate subsequently
increased to 92% in the CD population after a second procedure [122]. FiLaC™ has
the benet of a faster recovery, it preserves the sphincter, and it has a relatively short
learning curve to incorporate into one’s practice. The cost though, can be prohibitive
and because one is unable to visualize the tracts as they are treated, there is the
potential for failure of treatment of secondary and more complex stulous tracts
resulting in decreased healing rates. Ultimately, this technology is still relatively
new and further studies are needed to describe its efcacy and benet related to
other treatment techniques, however initial ndings in CD patients has been promising [123].
Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT)
Video-assisted anal stula treatment (VAAFT) is a two stage procedure in which a
“stuloscope” is rst inserted into the external opening of a stula tract in order to
identify the internal opening as well as any secondary tracts. Once fully explored, a
special electrode is placed and cautery is used to obliterate the tract under direct
visualization followed by debridement of the tract and closure of the internal opening with suture, staples, or an advancement ap. The technique was initially
described in by Meinero etal. in 2011in non-CD patients in which they described
a 3month healing rate of 73% and 1year healing rate of 87% [124]. Subsequent
studies in CD patients demonstrated consistent high healing rates. A prospective
study in 13 CD patients who underwent VAAFT with and advancement ap closure
demonstrated a success rate of 82% at 9months without any associated morbidity
or incontinence [125]. A subsequent study in 25 CD patients who underwent
VAAFT with seton placement instead of denitive closure, demonstrated improved
self-reported pain and discharge in 84% of participants [126]. Unlike FiLaC™,
VAAFT has the benet of direct visualization in addition to sphincter preservation
but cost and longer learning curve are possible disadvantages. The VAAFT procedure remains a promising technique for the treatment of perianal stulas in CD
patients but further studies and comparisons between other techniques are still
needed (Fig.2.8).

30
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Obi and A. L. Lightner
abc
Fig. 2.8 Fistuloscope within the external opening of a stula tract (a). View from stuloscope of
lumen of the stula tract and abscess cavity before (b) and after (c) cauterization. (Adapted from
El-Barbary and Yusof etal. [127, 128])
Conclusion
Fistulizing perianal CD is a challenging phenotype of CD associated with substantial morbidity. Innovative surgical and medical approaches have enriched the therapeutic options available, but more work is needed to provide an algorithm for
consistent ability to achieve remission. As such, a multidisciplinary approach continues to be required in order to maximize optimal patient outcomes.
Conict of Interest Amy Lightner: consultant for Takeda, Mesoblast, Ossium, Boomerang,
Direct Biologics
References
1. Feuerstein JD, Cheifetz AS.Crohn disease: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Mayo
Clin Proc. 2017;92(7):1088–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.04.010.
2. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, etal. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic
review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(1):46.e42–54.e42; quiz e30. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.
gastro.2011.10.001.
3. Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Panaccione R, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, etal.
The natural history of stulizing Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County. Minn Gastroenterol.
2002;122(4):875–80. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.32362.
4. Geldof J, Iqbal N, Warusavitarne J, Hart A. The essential role of a multidisciplinary
approach in inammatory bowel diseases: combined medical-surgical treatment in complex perianal stulas in CD. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022;35(1):21–31. https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 0041- 1740035.
5. Owen HA, Buchanan GN, Schizas A, Cohen R, Williams AB.Quality of life with anal stula.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98(5):334–8. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0136.
6. Kotze PG, Shen B, Lightner A, Yamamoto T, Spinelli A, Ghosh S, etal. Modern management
of perianal stulas in Crohn’s disease: future directions. Gut. 2018;67(6):1181–94. https://
doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl- 2017- 314918.

2 Surgical vs Medical Management of Symptomatic Anal Fistulas in Patients…
https://t.me/medicina_free
7. Hellers G, Bergstrand O, Ewerth S, Holmström B.Occurrence and outcome after primary
treatment of anal stulae in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1980;21(6):525–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/
gut.21.6.525.
8. Zalieckas JM.Treatment of perianal Crohn’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 2017;26(6):391–397.
doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.10.009.
9. Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC, Williams AB, Wiesel P, Kamm MA.Response of stulating
Crohn’s disease to iniximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(3):387–93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2036.2003.01427.x.
10. Koelbel G, Schmiedl U, Majer MC, Weber P, Jenss H, Kueper K, etal. Diagnosis of stulae
and sinus tracts in patients with Crohn disease: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1989;152(5):999–1003. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.152.5.999.
11. Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, Fletcher JG, Clain JE, Tremaine WJ, etal. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia
for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal stulas. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(5):1064–72. https://
doi.org/10.1053/gast.2001.28676.
12. Gecse KB, Bemelman W, Kamm MA, Stoker J, Khanna R, Ng SC, etal. A global consensus
on the classication, diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of perianal stulising Crohn’s
disease. Gut. 2014;63(9):1381–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl- 2013- 306709.
13. Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM, Paquette IM, Saclarides TJ, Feingold DL, et al.
Clinical practice guideline for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and
rectovaginal Fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(12):1117–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/
dcr.0000000000000733.
14. Sharma A, Yadav P, Sahu M, Verma A.Current imaging techniques for evaluation of stula in ano: a review. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s43055- 020- 00252- 9.
15. Eglinton TW, Barclay ML, Gearry RB, Frizelle FA.The spectrum of perianal Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55(7):773–7. doi: https://doi.
org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825228b0, 777.
16. Göttgens KW, Jeuring SF, Sturkenboom R, Romberg-Camps MJ, Oostenbrug LE, Jonkers
DM, etal. Time trends in the epidemiology and outcome of perianal stulizing Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(5):595–601. https://
doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000000840.
17. Park SH, Aniwan S, Scott Harmsen W, Tremaine WJ, Lightner AL, Faubion WA, etal. Update
on the natural course of Fistulizing perianal Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort.
Inamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(6):1054–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izy329.
18. Carr S.Fistula In Ano. In: Velasco A, editor. StatPearls [Internet]: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
19. Park MY, Yoon YS, Lee JL, Park SH, Ye BD, Yang S-K, etal. Comparative perianal stula
closure rates following autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cell transplantation or treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents after seton placement in patients with Crohn’s
disease: a retrospective observational study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):401. https://doi.
org/10.1186/s13287- 021- 02484- 6.
20. Lee WY, Park KJ, Cho YB, Yoon SN, Song KH, Kim DS, etal. Autologous adipose tissuederived stem cells treatment demonstrated favorable and sustainable therapeutic effect for
Crohn’s stula. Stem Cells. 2013;31(11):2575–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1357.
21. Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB. AGA technical review on perianal
Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(5):1508–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
gastro.2003.08.025.
22. Irvine EJ.Usual therapy improves perianal Crohn’s disease as measured by a new disease
activity index. McMaster IBD study group. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;20(1):27–32.
23. Losco A, Viganò C, Conte D, Cesana BM, Basilisco G.Assessing the activity of perianal
Crohn’s disease: comparison of clinical indices and computer-assisted anal ultrasound.
Inamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(5):742–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20826.
31

32
https://t.me/medicina_free
24. Pikarsky AJ, Gervaz P, Wexner SD.Perianal Crohn disease: a new scoring system to evaluate and predict outcome of surgical intervention. Arch Surg. 2002;137(7):774–8. https://doi.
org/10.1001/archsurg.137.7.774.
25. Garg P, Kaur B, Goyal A, Yagnik VD, Dawka S, Menon GR.Lessons learned from an audit
of 1250 anal stula patients operated at a single center: a retrospective review. World J
Gastrointest Surg. 2021;13(4):340–54. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i4.340.
26. Jones JH, Lennard-Jones JE.Corticosteroids and corticotrophin in the treatment of Crohn’s
disease. Gut. 1966;7(2):181–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.7.2.181.
27. Nielsen OH, Munck LK.Drug insight: aminosalicylates for the treatment of IBD.Nat Clin
Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;4(3):160–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0696.
28. Su JW, Ma JJ, Zhang HJ.Use of antibiotics in patients with Crohn’s disease: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis. 2015;16(2):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751- 2980.12216.
29. Thia KT, Mahadevan U, Feagan BG, Wong C, Cockeram A, Bitton A, etal. Ciprooxacin or
metronidazole for the treatment of perianal stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(1):17–24.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20608.
30. Williams JL, Shaffer VO.Modern Management of Perianal Crohn’s disease: a review. Am
Surg. 2021;87(9):1361–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820956331.
31. Taxonera C, Schwartz DA, García-Olmo D.Emerging treatments for complex perianal stula
in Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(34):4263–72. https://doi.org/10.3748/
wjg.15.4263.
32. Brandt LJ, Bernstein LH, Boley SJ, Frank MS.Metronidazole therapy for perineal Crohn’s
disease: a follow-up study. Gastroenterology. 1982;83(2):383–7.
33. Dejaco C, Harrer M, Waldhoer T, Miehsler W, Vogelsang H, Reinisch W.Antibiotics and azathioprine for the treatment of perianal stulas in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2003;18(11–12):1113–20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2036.2003.01793.x.
34. West RL, van der Woude CJ, Hansen BE, Felt-Bersma RJ, van Tilburg AJ, Drapers JA, etal.
Clinical and endosonographic effect of ciprooxacin on the treatment of perianal stulae in
Crohn’s disease with iniximab: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther. 2004;20(11–12):1329–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2036.2004.02247.x.
35. Neurath M.Thiopurines in IBD: what is their mechanism of action? Gastroenterol Hepatol
(N Y). 2010;6(7):435–6.
36. Pearson DC, May GR, Fick GH, Sutherland LR. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in
Crohn disease. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(2):132–42. https://doi.org/1
0.7326/0003- 4819- 123- 2- 199507150- 00009.
37. Chande N, Tsoulis DJ, MacDonald JK.Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine for induction of
remission in Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:Cd000545. https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD000545.pub4.
38. Mejia JC, Basu A, Shapiro R.Chapter 17– Calcineurin inhibitors. In: Morris PJ, Knechtle
SJ, editors. Kidney transplantation – principles and practice. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA):
W.B.Saunders; 2014. p.231–49.
39. Sandborn WJ, Present DH, Isaacs KL, Wolf DC, Greenberg E, Hanauer SB, etal. Tacrolimus
for the treatment of stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled
trial. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(2):380–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016- 5085(03)00877- 1.
40. Hart AL, Plamondon S, Kamm MA.Topical tacrolimus in the treatment of perianal Crohn’s
disease: exploratory randomized controlled trial. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(3):245–53.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20073.
41. Hanauer SB, Smith MB.Rapid closure of Crohn’s disease stulas with continuous intravenous cyclosporin a. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(5):646–9.
42. Present DH, Lichtiger S.Efcacy of cyclosporine in treatment of stula of Crohn’s disease.
Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39(2):374–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02090211.
43. Cronstein BN, Aune TM.Methotrexate and its mechanisms of action in inammatory arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(3):145–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584- 020- 0373- 9.
M. Obi and A. L. Lightner

2 Surgical vs Medical Management of Symptomatic Anal Fistulas in Patients…
https://t.me/medicina_free
44. Soon SY, Ansari A, Yaneza M, Raoof S, Hirst J, Sanderson JD.Experience with the use
of low-dose methotrexate for inammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2004;16(9):921–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737- 200409000- 00018.
45. Mahadevan U, Marion JF, Present DH.Fistula response to methotrexate in Crohn’s disease:
a case series. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(10):1003–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-
2036.2003.01790.x.
46. Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, Hanauer SB, Mayer L, van Hogezand RA, et al.
Iniximab for the treatment of stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med.
1999;340(18):1398–405. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199905063401804.
47. Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, Chey WY, Feagan BG, Fedorak RN, etal. Iniximab
maintenance therapy for stulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(9):876–85.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030815.
48. Lichtenstein GR, Yan S, Bala M, Blank M, Sands BE. Iniximab maintenance treatment reduces hospitalizations, surgeries, and procedures in stulizing Crohn’s disease.
Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4):862–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.01.048.
49. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, Mantzaris GJ, Kornbluth A, Rachmilewitz D,
etal. Iniximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med.
2010;362(15):1383–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0904492.
50. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Fedorak RN, Lukas M, MacIntosh D, etal. Human
anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody (adalimumab) in Crohn’s disease: the
CLASSIC-I trial. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(2):323–33; quiz 591. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.
gastro.2005.11.030.
51. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, Colombel JF, Panaccione R, et al.
Adalimumab induction therapy for Crohn disease previously treated with iniximab: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(12):829–38. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003- 4819- 146-
12- 200706190- 00159.
52. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, Panaccione R, et al.
Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s
disease: the CHARM trial. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):52–65. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.
gastro.2006.11.041.
53. Colombel JF, Schwartz DA, Sandborn WJ, Kamm MA, D’Haens G, Rutgeerts P,
et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut.
2009;58(7):940–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.159251.
54. Ji CC, Takano S.Clinical efcacy of adalimumab versus iniximab and the factors associated
with recurrence or aggravation during treatment of anal stulas in Crohn’s disease. Intest Res.
2017;15(2):182–6. https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.182.
55. Hinojosa J, Gomollón F, García S, Bastida G, Cabriada JL, Saro C, etal. Efcacy and safety
of short-term adalimumab treatment in patients with active Crohn’s disease who lost response
or showed intolerance to iniximab: a prospective, open-label, multicentre trial. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(4):409–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2036.2006.03232.x.
56. Dewint P, Hansen BE, Verhey E, Oldenburg B, Hommes DW, Pierik M, et al. Adalimumab
combined with ciprooxacin is superior to adalimumab monotherapy in perianal stula closure in Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (ADAFI). Gut.
2014;63(2):292–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl- 2013- 304488.
57. Schreiber S, Lawrance IC, Thomsen O, Hanauer SB, Bloomeld R, Sandborn WJ.Randomised
clinical trial: certolizumab pegol for stulas in Crohn’s disease- subgroup results from
a placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(2):185–93. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1365- 2036.2010.04509.x.
58. Vavricka SR, Spasojevic M, Rogler G, Schoepfer AM, Seibold F, Borovicka J, etal. Longterm efcacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol in an unselected Crohn’s disease population:
the FACTS III survey. Dig Dis. 2017;35(5):423–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000475494.
59. Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, D’Haens G, Lee SD, Allez M, Fedorak RN, etal. Randomised
clinical trial: vercirnon, an oral CCR9 antagonist, vs. placebo as induction therapy in active
33

34
https://t.me/medicina_free
Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(10):1170–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/
apt.13398.
60. Schwartz DA, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Lasch K, Adsul S, Danese S. Efcacy and safety of 2
Vedolizumab intravenous regimens for perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s disease: ENTERPRISE
study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(5):1059–67.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cgh.2021.09.028.
61. Khorrami S, Ginard D, Marín-Jiménez I, Chaparro M, Sierra M, Aguas M, etal. Ustekinumab
for the treatment of refractory Crohn’s disease: the Spanish experience in a large multicentre open-label cohort. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(7):1662–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/
mib.0000000000000842.
62. Dulai PS, Buckey JC Jr, Raffals LE, Swoger JM, Claus PL, OʼToole K, etal. Hyperbaric
oxygen therapy is well tolerated and effective for ulcerative colitis patients hospitalized for moderate-severe ares: a phase 2A pilot multi-center, randomized, double-blind,
sham-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(10):1516–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41395- 018- 0005- z.
63. Zabot GP, Cassol O, Saad-Hossne R, Bemelman W.Modern surgical strategies for perianal
Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(42):6572–81. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.
v26.i42.6572.
64. Lavy A, Weisz G, Adir Y, Ramon Y, Melamed Y, Eidelman S.Hyperbaric oxygen for perianal
Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19(3):202–5.
65. Wang X, Shen B.Advances in perianal disease associated with Crohn’s disease-evolving
approaches. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019;29(3):515–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
giec.2019.02.011.
66. Ferrante M, Siproudhis L, Poggioli G, Reinshagen M, Milicevic S, Roset M, etal. P801 treatment patterns of complex perianal stula in Crohn’s disease in ve European countries: the
PREFACE study, a retrospective chart review. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2020;14(Supplement_1):S628.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco- jcc/jjz203.929.
67. Broe PJ, Bayless TM, Cameron JL.Crohn’s disease: are enteroenteral stulas an indication
for surgery? Surgery. 1982;91(3):249–53.
68. Fichera A, Michelassi F. Surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. J Gastrointest Surg.
2007;11(6):791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605- 006- 0068- 9.
69. Keighley MR, Allan RN.Current status and inuence of operation on perianal Crohn’s disease. Int J Color Dis. 1986;1(2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648416.
70. Solomon MJ.Fistulae and abscesses in symptomatic perianal Crohn’s disease. Int J Color
Dis. 1996;11(5):222–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003840050051.
71. Hyder SA, Travis SP, Jewell DP, Mc CMNJ, George BD. Fistulating anal Crohn’s
disease: results of combined surgical and iniximab treatment. Dis Colon Rectum.
2006;49(12):1837–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350- 006- 0656- 5.
72. Shenoy-Bhangle A, Nimkin K, Goldner D, Bradley WF, Israel EJ, Gee MS.MRI predictors
of treatment response for perianal stulizing Crohn disease in children and young adults.
Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247- 013- 2771- 5.
73. Hämäläinen KP, Sainio AP.Cutting seton for anal stulas: high risk of minor control defects.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(12):1443–6.; discussion 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02070710.
74. Feroz SH, Ahmed A, Muralidharan A, Thirunavukarasu P. Comparison of the efcacy of
the various treatment modalities in the Management of Perianal Crohn’s Fistula: a review.
Cureus. 2020;12(12):e11882.
75. Talbot C, Sagar PM, Johnston MJ, Finan PJ, Burke D.Iniximab in the surgical management of complex stulating anal Crohn’s disease. Color Dis. 2005;7(2):164–8. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1463- 1318.2004.00749.x.
76. Tanaka S, Matsuo K, Sasaki T, Nakano M, Sakai K, Beppu R, et al. Clinical advantages
of combined seton placement and iniximab maintenance therapy for perianal stulizing
Crohn’s disease: when and how were the seton drains removed? Hepato-Gastroenterology.
2010;57(97):3–7.
M. Obi and A. L. Lightner

2 Surgical vs Medical Management of Symptomatic Anal Fistulas in Patients…
https://t.me/medicina_free
77. Thornton M, Solomon MJ.Long-term indwelling seton for complex anal stulas in Crohn’s
disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(3):459–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350- 004- 0830- 6.
78. Wasmann KA, de Groof EJ, Stellingwerf ME, D’Haens GR, Ponsioen CY, Gecse KB,
etal. Treatment of perianal stulas in Crohn’s disease, Seton versus anti-TNF versus surgical closure following anti-TNF [PISA]: a randomised controlled trial. J Crohns Colitis.
2020;14(8):1049–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco- jcc/jjaa004.
79. Jimenez M, Mandava N.Anorectal Fistula. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls
Publishing Copyright © 2022. StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2022.
80. Sangwan YP, Schoetz DJ Jr, Murray JJ, Roberts PL, Coller JA.Perianal Crohn’s disease.
Results of local surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(5):529–35. https://doi.
org/10.1007/bf02058706.
81. Nordgren S, Fasth S, Hultén L.Anal stulas in Crohn’s disease: incidence and outcome of
surgical treatment. Int J Color Dis. 1992;7(4):214–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00341224.
82. Halme L, Sainio AP. Factors related to frequency, type, and outcome of anal stulas in
Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(1):55–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02053858.
83. Farag AFA, Elbarmelgi MY, Mostafa M, Mashhour AN.One stage stulectomy for high
anal stula with reconstruction of anal sphincter without fecal diversion. Asian J Surg.
2019;42(8):792–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.005.
84. Seyfried S, Bussen D, Joos A, Galata C, Weiss C, Herold A.Fistulectomy with primary
sphincter reconstruction. Int J Color Dis. 2018;33(7):911–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00384- 018- 3042- 6.
85. Murtaza G, Shaikh FA, Chawla T, Rajput BU, Shahzad N, Ansari S. Fistulotomy versus stulectomy for simple stula in ano: a retrospective cohort study. J Pak Med Assoc.
2017;67(3):339–42.
86. Grimaud JC, Munoz-Bongrand N, Siproudhis L, Abramowitz L, Sénéjoux A, Vitton
V, et al. Fibrin glue is effective healing perianal stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2010;138(7):2275–81, 81.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gas-
tro.2010.02.013, 2281.e1.
87. Vidon M, Munoz-Bongrand N, Lambert J, Maggiori L, Zeitoun JD, Corte H, etal. Long-term
efcacy of brin glue injection for perianal stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Color
Dis. 2021;23(4):894–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15477.
88. Adamina M, Bonovas S, Raine T, Spinelli A, Warusavitarne J, Armuzzi A, etal. ECCO
guidelines on therapeutics in Crohn’s disease: surgical treatment. J Crohns Colitis.
2020;14(2):155–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco- jcc/jjz187.
89. Senéjoux A, Siproudhis L, Abramowitz L, Munoz-Bongrand N, Desseaux K, Bouguen G,
etal. Fistula plug in Fistulising Ano-perineal Crohn’s disease: a randomised controlled trial.
J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10(2):141–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco- jcc/jjv162.
90. Jayne DG, Scholeeld J, Tolan D, Gray R, Edlin R, Hulme CT, etal. Anal stula plug versus surgeon’s preference for surgery for trans-sphincteric anal stula: the FIAT RCT.Health
Technol Assess. 2019;23(21):1–76. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta23210.
91. Song K.New techniques for treating an anal Fistula. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28:7–12.
https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.7.
92. Stellingwerf ME, van Praag EM, Tozer PJ, Bemelman WA, Buskens CJ.Systematic review
and meta-analysis of endorectal advancement ap and ligation of the intersphincteric stula
tract for cryptoglandular and Crohn’s high perianal stulas. BJS Open. 2019;3(3):231–41.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50129.
93. Soltani A, Kaiser AM. Endorectal advancement ap for cryptoglandular or Crohn’s
stula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(4):486–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/
DCR.0b013e3181ce8b01.
94. Nielsen OH, Rogler G, Hahnloser D, Thomsen O.Diagnosis and management of stulizing Crohn’s disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(2):92–106. https://doi.
org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1340.
35

36
https://t.me/medicina_free
95. Bessi G, Siproudhis L, Merlini l’Héritier A, Wallenhorst T, Le Balc’h E, Bouguen G, etal.
Advancement ap procedure in Crohn and non-Crohn perineal stulas: a simple surgical
approach. Color Dis. 2019;21(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14417.
96. Lightner AL, Faubion WA, Fletcher JG. Interdisciplinary Management of Perianal
Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2017;46(3):547–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
gtc.2017.05.008.
97. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K.Total anal sphincter
saving technique for stula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric stula tract. J Med Assoc
Thail. 2007;90(3):581–6.
98. Mujukian A, Truong A, Fleshner P, Zaghiyan K.Long-term healing after complex anal stula
repair in patients with Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(8):833–41. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10151- 020- 02238- 1.
99. Kamiński JP, Zaghiyan K, Fleshner P. Increasing experience of ligation of the intersphincteric stula tract for patients with Crohn’s disease: what have we learned? Color Dis.
2017;19(8):750–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13668.
100. Gingold DS, Murrell ZA, Fleshner PR.A prospective evaluation of the ligation of the intersphincteric tract procedure for complex anal stula in patients with Crohn’s disease. Ann
Surg. 2014;260(6):1057–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000479.
101. Wood T, Truong A, Mujukian A, Zaghiyan K, Fleshner P.Increasing experience with the
LIFT procedure in Crohn’s disease patients with complex anal stula. Tech Coloproctol.
2022;26(3):205–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151- 022- 02582- 4.
102. Lo OSH.Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula tract (LIFT). In: Meng WCS, Cheung HYS,
Lam DTY, Ng SSM, editors. Minimally invasive Coloproctology: advances in techniques and
technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p.175–82.
103. Sangar P.Fistula-in-ano: how I do the LIFT procedure. Sri Lanka J Sur. 2012;29:97.
104. Yamamoto T, Allan RN, Keighley MR. Effect of fecal diversion alone on perianal Crohn’s
disease. World J Surg. 2000;24(10):1258–62; discussion 62–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s002680010250.
105. Singh S, Ding NS, Mathis KL, Dulai PS, Farrell AM, Pemberton JH, etal. Systematic review
with meta-analysis: faecal diversion for management of perianal Crohn’s disease. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(7):783–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13356.
106. Bell SJ, Williams AB, Wiesel P, Wilkinson K, Cohen RC, Kamm MA.The clinical course
of stulating Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(9):1145–51. https://doi.
org/10.1046/j.1365- 2036.2003.01561.x.
107. Wolff BG, Culp CE, Beart RW Jr, Ilstrup DM, Ready RL. Anorectal Crohn’s disease. A
long-term perspective. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28(10):709–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/
bf02560279.
108. Maeda Y, Heyckendorff-Diebold T, Tei TM, Lundby L, Buntzen S.Gracilis muscle transposition for complex stula and persistent nonhealing sinus in perianal Crohn’s disease. Inamm
Bowel Dis. 2011;17(2):583–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21311.
109. Collie MH, Potter MA, Bartolo DC.Myocutaneous aps promote perineal healing in inammatory bowel disease. Br J Surg. 2005;92(6):740–1. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4872.
110. Marzo M, Felice C, Pugliese D, Andrisani G, Mocci G, Armuzzi A, etal. Management
of perianal stulas in Crohn’s disease: an up-to-date review. World J Gastroenterol.
2015;21(5):1394–403. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1394.
111. García-Olmo D, García-Arranz M, García LG, Cuellar ES, Blanco IF, Prianes LA, etal.
Autologous stem cell transplantation for treatment of rectovaginal stula in perianal Crohn’s
disease: a new cell-based therapy. Int J Color Dis. 2003;18(5):451–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00384- 003- 0490- 3.
112. García-Olmo D, García-Arranz M, Herreros D, Pascual I, Peiro C, Rodríguez-Montes
JA.A phase I clinical trial of the treatment of Crohn’s stula by adipose mesenchymal
stem cell transplantation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(7):1416–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10350- 005- 0052- 6.
M. Obi and A. L. Lightner

2 Surgical vs Medical Management of Symptomatic Anal Fistulas in Patients…
https://t.me/medicina_free
113. Garcia-Olmo D, Herreros D, Pascual I, Pascual JA, Del-Valle E, Zorrilla J, etal. Expanded
adipose- derived stem cells for the treatment of complex perianal stula: a phase II clinical trial.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181973487.
114. Panés J, García-Olmo D, Van Assche G, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Baumgart DC, etal.
Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cx601) for complex perianal stulas in Crohn’s disease: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Lancet.
2016;388(10051):1281–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140- 6736(16)31203- x.
115. Panés J, García-Olmo D, Van Assche G, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Baumgart DC, etal. Longterm efcacy and safety of stem cell therapy (Cx601) for complex perianal stulas in patients
with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(5):1334–42.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.
gastro.2017.12.020.
116. Lightner AL, Wang Z, Zubair AC, Dozois EJ.A systematic review and meta-analysis of
mesenchymal stem cell injections for the treatment of perianal Crohn’s disease: Progress
made and future directions. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(5):629–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/
dcr.0000000000001093.
117. Dietz AB, Dozois EJ, Fletcher JG, Butler GW, Radel D, Lightner AL, et al. Autologous
mesenchymal stem cells, applied in a bioabsorbable matrix, for treatment of perianal stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(1):59–62.e2. https://doi.
org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.001.
118. Lightner AL, Otero Pineiro A, Reese J, Ream J, Nachand D, Bena J, etal. One year follow
up of three phase IB/IIA clinical trials of Ex Vivo expanded Allogeneic Bone marrow derived
mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease In Press 2022.
119. Georgiev-Hristov T, Guadalajara H, Herreros MD, Lightner AL, Dozois EJ, García-Arranz
M, etal. A step-by-step surgical protocol for the treatment of perianal Fistula with adiposederived mesenchymal stem cells. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(11):2003–12. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11605- 018- 3895- 6.
120. Moy J, Bodzin J.Carbon dioxide laser ablation of perianal stulas in patients with Crohn’s disease: experience with 27 patients. Am J Surg. 2006;191(3):424–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
amjsurg.2005.10.050.
121. Wilhelm A. A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal stula repair using a novel
radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):445–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10151- 011- 0726- 0.
122. Wilhelm A, Fiebig A, Krawczak M.Five years of experience with the FiLaC™ laser for
stula-in-ano management: long-term follow-up from a single institution. Tech Coloproctol.
2017;21(4):269–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151- 017- 1599- 7.
123. Alam A, Lin F, Fathallah N, Pommaret E, Aubert M, Lemarchand N, etal. FiLaC(®) and
Crohn’s disease perianal stulas: a pilot study of 20 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol.
2020;24(1):75–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151- 019- 02134- 3.
124. Meinero P, Mori L.Video-assisted anal stula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving
procedure for treating complex anal stulas. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):417–22. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s10151- 011- 0769- 2.
125. Schwandner O.Video-assisted anal stula treatment (VAAFT) combined with advancement
ap repair in Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(2):221–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10151- 012- 0921- 7.
126. Adegbola SO, Sahnan K, Tozer PJ, Strouhal R, Hart AL, Lung PFC, etal. Symptom amelioration in Crohn’s perianal stulas using video-assisted anal Fistula treatment (VAAFT). J
Crohns Colitis. 2018;12(9):1067–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco- jcc/jjy071.
127. El-Barbary HM.Video assisted anal Fistula treatment “VAAFT technique” for complex perianal stulas. Open Access J Sur: Juniper Publishers. 2016;1:555571.
128. Yusof S, Zhao Y.Novel use of video-assisted anal stula treatment (VAAFT) stuloscope
in the treatment of chronic sinus tracts following low anterior resection. Asian J Sur.
2020;43(8):851–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.04.015. Copyright Elsevier 2020
37
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
