Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 566 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
47
Hiatal Hernias
Patients with GERD often are found to have hiatal hernias, which can be identied on the barium esophagram. There are four types of hiatal hernias. A type I hernia is also referred to as a sliding hernia and involves displacement of the gastroesophageal junc­tion (GEJ) above the diaphragm. A type II hernia is characterized by the GEJ xed below the diaphragm with herniation of the gas­tric fundus above the diaphragm. A type III hernia involves both the GEJ and gastric fundus herniating above the diaphragm and a type IV hiatal hernia involves both gastric and non-gastric viscera herniating above the diaphragmatic hiatus [22]. Hiatal hernias can be identied on esophagography when the gastric rugal folds or a gastric bubble is noted to be above the level of the diaphragmatic hiatus (Fig.4.4). Esophagography has superiority over endoscopy in identifying hiatal hernias, especially type I sliding hernias. The improved identication of sliding hiatal hernias is a result of increased intraabdominal pressure while being in the prone posi­tion causing the hernia to be more apparent than when the stom­ach is insufated with air [23]. Identication of hiatal hernias in the workup of foregut disorders is very important as their identi­cation can alter the therapeutic plan for patients. Radiologists should be discouraged from characterizing hiatal hernias as small, medium, or large as no such standard exists. Rather, they should be described in terms of axial and transverse length, as well as relative positioning of the LES, fundus, and give information regarding evidence of organo-axial or meso-axial volvulus.
48
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 4.4 Type III paraesophageal hernia. The red line represents the outline of a type III paraesophageal hernia. The blue line represents the diaphragm
E. J. Furay et al.
Esophageal Diverticula
The esophagus can develop multiple types of diverticula, such as Zenker’s, pulsion, and traction diverticula. A Zenker’s diverticulum is an acquired outpouching of mucosa and submucosal layers between the cricopharyngeal and the inferior pharyngeal constric­tor muscles resulting in a false diverticulum [24]. On esophagogra­phy, the diverticulum usually arises from the midline of the posterior wall and is best identied on the lateral view of the esophagram (Fig. 4.5) [25]. Pulsion diverticula typically occur in the distal esophagus and are usually associated with motility disorders of the esophagus. They do not contain the muscular layer of the esopha­gus, thus making them a false diverticulum. On the esophagram, they appear as broad-based contrast-lled outpouchings and typi­cally retain barium after the esophagus has emptied [26, 27]. In
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 4.5 Zenker’s diverticulum
49
contrast, traction diverticula are typically seen in the mid-esopha­gus and contain all the layers of the esophagus and thus are consid­ered a true diverticulum. They are caused by mediastinal scarring secondary to infectious processes, leading to traction on the adja­cent esophagus [27]. On barium swallow, traction diverticula tend to have a triangular and tented appearance [27, 28]. Esophagram allows for safe identication of this diverticulum and in some cases is enough workup to warrant operative intervention.
Neoplasms
Other structural abnormalities such as malignant and nonmalig­nant tumors are able to be identied on an esophagram. These present as crescent-shaped lling defects. More benign tumors are characterized by smooth edges without irregularity or ulceration, whereas more malignant tumors commonly result in irregular luminal narrowing and ulcerations (Fig.4.6) [29]. It is important to note that these ndings and alarm symptoms for malignancy must be further evaluated using endoscopy.
50
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. J. Furay et al.
Fig. 4.6 Mid-esophageal tumor seen as a crescent-shaped lling defect on the esophagram
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
51
Perforation
Iatrogenic, spontaneous, and traumatic esophageal perforations may have different management strategies, but their diagnostic approach remains fairly similar. In an unstable patient with a high index of suspicion for esophageal perforation, regardless of etiol­ogy, operative intervention should not be delayed. In those patients who are stable and further workup is reasonable, utilizing esopha­gography is useful. Although we commonly advocate using bar­ium for most esophagrams, when investigating for a perforation we advocate for the initial use of a water-soluble contrast because barium extravasation into the mediastinum carries a risk of medi­astinitis/pleuritis and is harder to washout during surgical explo­ration [30]. If no perforation is identied using water-soluble contrast, further evaluation using barium should be considered if there is a high clinical suspicion for perforation. The identica­tion of contrast extravasation from the esophageal lumen conrms the diagnosis of esophageal perforation.
Motility Disorders
Esophageal motility disorders are commonly seen in patients with GERD, with some sources quoting esophageal dysmotility in up to 44% of patients with GERD [31]. Schima etal. reported that esophagram has about a 79% sensitivity rate for identifying dys­motility in patients with dysphagia [32]. During an esophagram, a radiologist not only assesses structural abnormalities, but also evaluate the esophagus for functional disorders. In a normal esophagus, the primary peristaltic wave and occasionally a sec­ondary peristaltic wave are able to clear a contrast bolus [13]. For a radiologist to consider clearance of the contrast bolus to be nor­mal, the patient should clear the bolus in two or fewer strippings from the esophagus [12]. Tertiary contractions are one of the nd­ings suggestive of disordered esophageal motility, but when patients with tertiary contractions were further evaluated with high-resolution manometry (HRM), only about 47% had con­rmed dysmotility [33].
52
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. J. Furay et al.
In addition to minor motility disorders, barium esophagrams can be useful in diagnosing more severe forms of motility disor­ders such as achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm. While high­resolution manometry remains the gold standard for these diagnoses, barium esophagrams have proven to be a practical and benecial initial diagnostic test.
Achalasia is a condition associated with the loss of myenteric plexus ganglion cells in the distal esophagus and lower esopha­geal sphincter (LES) leading to impaired relaxation of the LES and aperistalsis in the esophageal body. On the esophagram, the most diagnostic nding is a dilated esophageal body and distal narrowing at the LES creating the classic “bird’s beak” appear­ance (Fig. 4.7). Patients with achalasia will demonstrate bolus retention in the distal esophagus [34]. Blonski etal. examined dif­ferent characteristics of the barium esophagram in patients with achalasia and proposed that a barium column height of >2cm at 5min from ingestion of barium be used as a cutoff point for iden­tifying patients with achalasia [35]. When ndings on the esopha­gram suggest achalasia, the diagnosis should be conrmed and categorized using HRM. Diffuse esophageal spasms (DES) are characterized by abnormal esophageal peristalsis with multiple simultaneous non- peristaltic contractions [36], often leading to chest pain and dysphagia This disorder is classically seen with a distinct “corkscrew appear­ance” caused by intermittent bouts of nonpropulsive contractions causing alternating areas of narrowing and normal esophageal diameter [36]. Similar to achalasia, esophagography ndings sug­gestive of DES should be conrmed with HRM prior to initiating therapy.
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
53
Fig. 4.7 Typical bird’s beak appearance in a patient with achalasia
Utilization inPre- andPost-surgical Management
The esophagram plays an important role in surgical planning for patients undergoing antireux surgery (ARS). During the upright double-contrast phase of an esophagram, the radiologist is
54
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. J. Furay et al.
sometimes able to identify a foreshortened esophagus. This becomes important in surgical planning as patients with signi­cant esophageal foreshortening occasionally require esophageal lengthening procedures such as a Collis gastroplasty. The knowl­edge of this prior to the operation can prepare the surgeon for this possibility or refer to a provider with the knowledge and skill in performing esophageal lengthening procedures [37].
Although a small sample size, Kahrilas and colleagues were able to show a correlation between normal esophageal motility in barium studies and normal peristalsis on manometry [38]. Alicuben etal. also demonstrated that an esophagram is a good screening tool for esophageal motility disorders. They were able to show that a normal esophagram, which they dened as stasis of liquid barium on less than three of ve swallows, can reliably rule out the presence of clinically signicant esophageal dysmotility in preoperative patients [39]. Overall, we do not recommend omitting manometry in the workup of a patient undergoing antire­ux surgery, but there is a select subset of patients who are unable to tolerate catheter placement during manometric studies or have a large paraesophageal hernia in which the catheter may coil in the stomach, and an esophagram may aid in surgical decision­making.
Esophageal dysmotility has been suggested as a reason many surgeons avoid complete Nissen fundoplication and instead per­form partial fundoplications because of the fear of signicant postoperative dysphagia. Two small randomized controlled trials were able to refute this notion, both showing no signicant differ­ence in outcomes between patient surgery tailored to their preop­erative esophageal motor function compared with those whose surgery was not tailored to their esophageal function [40, 41]. Baigrie etal. advocated that laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) should not be considered a contraindication in patients with disordered peristalsis as they were able to show similar satis­faction between those with and those without disordered esopha­geal peristalsis after LNF [42].
After ARS, esophagrams are extremely valuable in assessing dysphagia or recurrent GERD symptoms. They are able to evalu­ate the integrity and positioning of a fundoplication, conrm the
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
55
Fig. 4.8 Recurrent hernia after previous Nissen fundoplication
adequate position of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device, and can identify recurrent hiatal hernias (Figs. 4.8 and 4.9). During the double-contrast portion of the esophagram position­ing, the patient supine or in a slight Trendelenburg position can allow contrast to reux into the fundoplication and assess its posi­tion and ensure its integrity [37]. A form of secondary achalasia can develop in patients whose fundoplication was created too tightly and an esophagram may show the characteristic ndings of
56
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 4.9 Well­positioned magnetic sphincter augmentation device on the distal esophagus below the hiatus
E. J. Furay et al.
a patient with achalasia without the associated dilation of the more proximal esophagus [43]. Diagnosis of this early is impor­tant as treatment for this may involve dilation of the wrap or even surgical revision of the fundoplication [43].
Conclusion
The humble esophagram is an excellent initial imaging modality for the evaluation of suspected esophageal diseases or to evaluate postoperative complications in ARS. It provides excellent struc­tural detail and gives insight into esophageal function. When properly utilized and interpreted by the foregut surgeon, the esophagram is integral in the evaluation of patients with diseases of the esophagus and stomach.
Author Contributions EF involved in the literature review; EF wrote the study; and EF, SD, and FPB involved in critical revision.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025