Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 566 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
11 High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry with and…
https://t.me/medicina_free
20. Wang YT, Yazaki E, Sifrim D.High-resolution manometry: esophageal disorders not addressed by the “Chicago classication”. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:365.
21. Ghoshal UC, Kumar S, Saraswat VA, Aggarwal R, Misra A, Choudhuri G. Long-term follow-up after pneumatic dilation for achalasia cardia: factors associated with treatment failure and recurrence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2304.
22. Stoikes N, Drapekin J, Kushnir V, Shaker A, Brunt LM, Gyawali CP.The value of multiple rapid swallows during preoperative esophageal manom­etry before laparoscopic antireux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3401.
23. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, etal. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classication version 4.0©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058. https://doi.org/10.1111/
nmo.14058.
24. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, etal. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(11):1706–12. https://
doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.289.
25. Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, etal. Rapid drink challenge in high­resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(1):e12902. https://
doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12902.
171
Impedance Planimetry:
https://t.me/medicina_free
EndoFLIP
MichelleCampbell andMichaelUjiki
Background
Impedance planimetry has been used since the late 1980s to mea­sure compliance and cross-sectional area (CSA) of luminal organs and sphincters [1]. Over the next 20years, it was rened for use in all hollow organs but found particular utility in the lumen of the esophagus [2, 3]. In 2004, a new probe was developed allowing simultaneous measurement of multiple luminal CSAs [4] and was quickly adopted for use at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) [5]. The new method, known as functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), was validated in 2005 as a quantitative method for assess­ing the EGJ in diseases such as achalasia and GERD [6].
12
M. Campbell University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
M. Ujiki (*) NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA e-mail: mujiki@northshore.org
© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2023 A. D. Patel et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Physiologic Evaluation of Foregut Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39199-6_12
173
174
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Campbell and M. Ujiki
Denition
FLIP is an endoscopic catheter-based device that utilizes high­resolution impedance planimetry to measure luminal CSA and pressure allowing for calculation of distensibility, compliance, and depiction of luminal geometry [7]. The distal end of the 72-cm exible catheter carries impedance electrodes within a dis­tensible polyester urethane balloon, impermeable to body uids and electrical current [6]. The FDA has approved FLIP in two available congurations: 8-cm balloon with 16 paired sensors spaced 0.5cm apart (EF-325) utilized for evaluation of esophago­gastric junction (EGJ) or 16-cm balloon with 16 paired sensors spaced 1cm apart (EF-322) utilized for esophageal body in addi­tion to EGJ.The catheter is most often placed transorally into the esophagus with the most distal few sensors in the stomach, thereby spanning the EGJ (Fig.12.1). Transnasal placement is also pos­sible; however, most existing data is based on transoral place­ment.
Using a mechanical pump within the attached FLIP machine, the balloon is distended at controlled speed to a target ll volume with proprietary electrolyte solution of known conductance [7]. A continuous low electric current is emitted by electrodes at either end of the balloon and the voltage across paired electrodes mea­sured. Making use of Ohm’s law (voltage=current x resistance), the electrical resistance (impedance) of the uid is proportional to CSA.The original FLIP 1.0 module, available for use with either catheter, displays the calculated CSA measurements in a 3D depiction of the lumen (Fig.12.1). More recently, the FLIP 2.0 panometry module was released for use with the 16cm balloon catheter which topographically depicts diameter-pressure changes across space-time continuum representing contraction and disten­sion of the esophageal lumen.
Clinical Role The FLIP system’s primary utility is in evaluating the biophysical and motor properties of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter (LES), although theoretically its use can be expanded to any gastrointestinal sphincter, including the anal
Fli
r
Time: seconds
12 Impedance Planimetry: EndoFLIP
https://t.me/medicina_free
175
pTM Device: Placement
16-cm EGJ
Stomach
FlipTM 1.0
Time: Instant
Impedance planimetry channels : 1-cm spacing
Pressure
0 sec 100 sec 200 sec 300 sec
TM
Flip
2.0 Panometry
Diamete
(mm)
Esophageal body
-30
Anatomic location
-25
-20
-15
-10
EGJ
-5
Stomach
40 mmHg
20 mmHg
1
Fig. 12.1 Left: FLIP device position at the EGJ. Center: correlating FLIP
1.0 images. Right: FLIP 2.0 panometry topography representing diameter changes that represent contraction and distention of the esophageal lumen. EGJ esophagogastric junction, FLIP functional lumen imaging probe
canal [811]. Reported metrics obtained during FLIP evaluation include minimum diameter (mm), CSA (mm2), intra-balloon pressure (mmHg), distensibility index (mm2/mmHg), and compli­ance. Of these, distensibility index (DI), dened as the narrowest CSA divided by the corresponding pressure, is the most widely studied with the greatest clinical utility. Normal values for DI at the EGJ range from 3.1 to 9.0mm2/mmHg [12].
Achalasia andMotility Disorders
FLIP may be considered as a diagnostic adjunct to endoscopy, manometry, and cross-sectional imaging in the evaluation of sus­pected mechanical or motor obstruction at the EGJ. High­resolution manometry (HRM) is considered the gold standard in diagnosis of motility disorders, including achalasia in which inte­grated relaxation pressure (IRP) of the LES is >15 mmHg and peristalsis is absent. FLIP analysis reliably detects major esopha­geal motility disorders and achalasia when compared to HRM
176
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Campbell and M. Ujiki
[13]. In treatment-naïve achalasia patients, the EGJ demonstrates impaired distensibility with DI <1.0 mm2/mmHg [1417]. Moreover, FLIP may show a slight advantage over HRM, having been shown to detect impaired EGJ distensibility despite normal IRP on manometry in a subgroup of patients with typical achala­sia symptoms and abnormal peristalsis [18]. Volumetric disten­sion within the esophagus during FLIP analysis triggers secondary peristalsis [19]. The second iteration of the FLIP system, FLIP 2.0 panometry, allows serial measurements of luminal diameters plot­ted as a function of time in topographic fashion using interpola­tion to depict peristalsis in the esophagus akin to high-resolution manometry. This has led to an expanded role for FLIP 2.0 panom­etry in accurately identifying achalasia subtypes or other motility disorders using distension-induced contractility mapping [20]. FLIP panometry which is discordant from HRM may be useful in clarifying equivocal or undetected abnormalities on manometry.
The esophagus responds to distention by a bolus with contrac­tions. Similar to a food bolus, FLIP distends the esophagus and induces contractions that are repetitive and antegrade in patients with normal motility. In patients with achalasia, FILP panometry or topography can be used to identify the different achalasia classes. All three classes present with a low distensibility index at the lower esophageal sphincter, but vary in the contractile response. A patient with type I achalasia will have an absent con­tractile response. Those with type II achalasia will have decreased and disordered contractions. A patient with type III achalasia will have a topography pattern with abnormal retrograde and often, rapid contractions (Fig. 12.2). (ref: Donnan EN, Pandolno JE. EndoFLIP in the esophagus: assessing sphincter function, wall stiffness, and motility to guide treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;49 [3]:427–435.)
In addition to diagnostic utility, FLIP has shown excellent advantage in the assessment of treatment efcacy for achalasia. FLIP measurements obtained following pneumodilation, laparo­scopic Heller myotomy, or per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)
Diamete
FLIP topography: Contractile patterns
cd
12 Impedance Planimetry: EndoFLIP
https://t.me/medicina_free
Repetitive, ANTEGRADE
contractions (RACs)
ab
Pressure (mmHg)
150
120
90
60
30
0
r
(mm)
30
25
20
15
10
5
Absent
contractility
Contractility,
No RACs or RRCs
RETROGRADE
contractions
177
Repetitive,
(RRCs)
Fig. 12.2 Motility patterns in response to volumetric distention. The top panel is the high-resolution manometry image, and the bottom panel is the FLIP topography image of the representative patient. Panel (a) is a normal subject with a RAC pattern. Panel (b) is a patient with type I achalasia, and the FLIP depicts an absent contractile response and a poorly relaxing sphinc­ter. Panel (c) is type II achalasia, and the FLIP suggests that there are disor­dered non-occluding contractions in the body of the esophagus and the sphincter does not open. Panel (d) is a patient with type III achalasia, and the FLIP topography reveals an abnormal pattern where the contractions are ret­rograde and rapid in terms of the rate of contractions. Courtesy of the Esoph­ageal Center at Northwestern, Chicago, IL
have been shown to have signicant association with treatment success as reported by Eckardt scores [17, 21] and in fact show greater association when compared to manometric measurement of LES pressure [14]. Achieving an optimal DI range (4.5–
8.5mm2/mmHg) can successfully alleviate achalasia symptoms while minimizing risk of GERD [22]. Therefore, FLIP is now used with increasing frequency intraoperatively to assess extent and completeness of myotomy during laparoscopic Heller myot­omy or per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) [15, 23, 24].
178
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Campbell and M. Ujiki
GERD
Although there was initially early excitement at the prospect of utilizing FLIP technology to diagnose and stratify GERD patients for management planning [25], FLIP has since proven to be a poor diagnostic study for GERD with distensibility and CSA showing poor correlation to clinical symptoms or pH testing [26,
27]. However, FLIP does have an important role in the intraopera-
tive setting in guiding adequacy of fundoplication during reux procedures. Hiatus repair and fundoplication result in a signicant reduction in distensibility of the EGJ during reux surgery [28
30]. These distensibility changes can be measured by FLIP in real
time in the operating room at intervals throughout the procedure (e.g., initial, following hiatal dissection and hernia reduction, fol­lowing crural closure, and following fundoplication) [28]. Toupet fundoplication results in a more distensible EGJ than Nissen fun­doplication [29]. FLIP can be used to provide objective measure­ment of distensibility when performing fundoplication with early evidence suggesting that maintaining a DI between 2.0 and
3.5mm2/mmHg alleviates reux symptoms while limiting risk of gas bloat from an overly tight wrap [30]. Similarly, using addi­tional metrics provided by FLIP, a decrease in minimum EGJ diameter of 0.15mm or less, or a decrease in CSA of 1.5mm2 or less from initial to post-fundoplication results in greater associa­tion with severe heartburn in the postoperative period [31].
Gastroparesis
FLIP has also found utility in evaluating the pylorus in the setting of gastroparesis. Patients with diabetic and idiopathic gastropare­sis show decreased sphincter diameter and CSA which correlate inversely with presence of symptoms of early satiety and post­prandial fullness [32]. Similar to achalasia and GERD treatments, FLIP can be used in evaluating the efcacy of interventions including gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM). Following G-POEM, FLIP has shown higher CSA and DI in those
12 Impedance Planimetry: EndoFLIP
https://t.me/medicina_free
179
who achieve clinical relief of symptoms and improvement on gas­tric emptying scan [33]. Further studies are yet to be performed to better characterize the predictive value of FLIP in gastroparesis, as well as the potential role for tailoring intervention such as with POEM in the achalasia population.
Summary
EndoFLIP is a novel technique with rapidly expanding clinical use in diagnostics and treatment guidance in achalasia, GERD, gastroparesis, and other motility disorders of the foregut and beyond. It is an excellent diagnostic tool in esophageal motility disorders including achalasia, serving currently as an adjunct to manometry with potential to replace HRM as further renement is made to diagnostic parameters. While not as useful in the diagno­sis of GERD, FLIP serves as a valuable tool in the intervention of both achalasia and GERD by allowing the foregut surgeon or interventional endoscopist to guide the POEM or fundoplication procedure in real time for greater treatment efcacy. Application of FLIP to other foregut disorders such as gastroparesis diagnosis and management shows similar promise. As FLIP analysis is more widely adopted, we anticipate a corresponding increase in the availability of both normative data and in-depth applications to the study of foregut pathophysiology and beyond.
References
1. Gregersen H, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H, Djurhuus JC, Mortensen SO.The four-electrode impedance technique: a method for investigation of com­pliance in luminal organs. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1988;9(Suppl A):61–
4.
2. Drewes AM, Pedersen J, Liu W, Arendt-Nielsen L, Gregersen H.Controlled mechanical distension of the human oesophagus: sensory and biomechanical ndings. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(1):27–35.
3. Rao SSC, Gregersen H, Hayek B, Summers RW, Christensen J.Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(11):950–8.
180
https://t.me/medicina_free
4. Andersen IS, Gregersen H, Buntzen S, Djurhuus JC, Laurberg S.New probe for the measurement of dynamic changes in the rectum. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16(1):99–105.
5. McMahon BP, Frøkjaer JB, Drewes AM, Gregersen H.A new measure­ment of oesophago-gastric junction competence. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16(5):543–6.
6. McMahon BP, Frøkjaer JB, Liao D, Kunwald P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H.A new technique for evaluating sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for the evalua­tion of the oesophago-gastric junction. Physiol Meas. 2005;26(5):823–
36.
7. Savarino E, di Pietro M, Bredenoord AJ, Carlson DA, Clarke JO, Khan A, etal. Use of the functional lumen imaging probe in clinical esophagology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1786.
8. Alqudah MM, Gregersen H, Drewes AM, McMahon BP. Evaluation of anal sphincter resistance and distensibility in healthy controls using EndoFLIP ©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(12):e591–9.
9. Sørensen G, Liao D, Lundby L, Fynne L, Buntzen S, Gregersen H, etal. Distensibility of the anal canal in patients with idiopathic fecal inconti­nence: a study with the functional lumen imaging probe. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(2):255–63.
10. Gourcerol G, Granier S, Bridoux V, Menard JF, Ducrotté P, Leroi AM.Do endoip assessments of anal sphincter distensibility provide more infor­mation on patients with fecal incontinence than high-resolution anal manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(3):399–409.
11. Leroi AM, Melchior C, Charpentier C, Bridoux V, Savoye-Collet C, Houivet E, etal. The diagnostic value of the functional lumen imaging probe versus high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(6):e13291.
12. Carlson DA, Kou W, Lin Z, Hinchcliff M, Thakrar A, Falmagne S, etal. Normal values of esophageal Distensibility and distension-induced con­tractility measured by functional luminal imaging probe panometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):674–681.e1.
13. Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, Hirano I, Gonsalves N, Listernick Z, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1726–35.
14. Rohof WO, Hirsch DP, Kessing BF, Boeckxstaens GE.Efcacy of treat­ment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction. Gastroenterology. 2012 Aug;143(2):328–35.
15. Rieder E, Swanström LL, Perretta S, Lenglinger J, Riegler M, Dunst CM.Intraoperative assessment of esophagogastric junction distensibility during per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):400–5.
16. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Sternbach J, Donnan EN, Friesen L, etal. The functional lumen imaging probe detects esophageal contractil-
M. Campbell and M. Ujiki
12 Impedance Planimetry: EndoFLIP
https://t.me/medicina_free
ity not observed with manometry in patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1742–51.
17. Pandolno JE, de Ruigh A, Nicodème F, Xiao Y, Boris L, Kahrilas PJ.Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction assessed with the func­tional lumen imaging probe (FLIP™) in achalasia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(6):496–501.
18. Ponds FA, Bredenoord AJ, Kessing BF, Smout AJPM.Esophagogastric junction distensibility identies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(1).
19. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Rogers MC, Lin CY, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolno JE. Utilizing functional lumen imaging probe topography to evaluate esophageal contractility during volumetric distention: a pilot study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(7):981–9.
20. Carlson DA, Kou W, Rooney KP, Baumann AJ, Donnan E, Triggs JR, etal. Achalasia subtypes can be identied with functional luminal imag­ing probe (FLIP) panometry using a supervised machine learning pro­cess. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;33(3):e13932.
21. Ngamruengphong S, von Rahden BHA, Filser J, Tyberg A, Desai A, Sharaiha RZ, etal. Intraoperative measurement of esophagogastric junc­tion cross-sectional area by impedance planimetry correlates with clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2886–94.
22. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolno JE, Kahrilas PJ, Hirano I, Boris L, etal. Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):522–8.
23. Su B, Callahan ZM, Novak S, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB.Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to evaluate myotomy and predict outcomes after surgery for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(4):964–71.
24. Holmstrom AL, Campagna RAJ, Cirera A, Carlson DA, Pandolno JE, Teitelbaum EN, etal. Intraoperative use of FLIP is associated with clini­cal success following POEM for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2020;35:3090.
25. Kwiatek MA, Pandolno JE, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ. Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(2):272–8.
26. Tucker E, Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Telakis E, Knowles K, etal. Measurement of esophago-gastric junction cross-sectional area and dis­tensibility by an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe for the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(11):904–10.
27. Carlson DA, Kathpalia P, Craft J, Tye M, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, etal. The relationship between esophageal acid exposure and the esophageal response to volumetric distention. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(3).
181
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025