Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 220 - файл
.pdf
15.9 Specic Considerations
https://t.me/medicina_free
401
ciated with OHSS, they may grow rapidly to form
abdominal abscesses because the ascitic uid of
OHSS serves as an excellent culture medium for
bacteria with its rich source of nutrients, including
albumin [279]. OHSS, complicated by intraperitoneal inammatory disease, may worsen its
potentially life- threatening condition.
For patients with the risk of severe OHSS,
such as rapidly increasing estradiol levels or massive follicular recruitment, a decrease in medication dosages or alteration of the ratio of individual
medications in the regimen could be attempted.
However, these medications should be withdrawn
if the non-obstetric acute abdomen is suspected
or proven. In the single case of OHSS with perforated AA, there is no mention of complications
during the prolonged (37 days) postoperative
course or perioperative care except for appendectomy and antibiotics [276].
15.9.5 Prognosis
Low birth weight and macrosomia are associated
with immediate and long-term risks to offspring,
including IVF singletons [280, 281]. The factors
leading to infertility may be responsible for the
adverse perinatal outcome rather than the process
itself [282]. Maternal characteristics—maternal
age, the source of the oocyte, and cervical causes
of infertility—are strongly associated with the
risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in
singleton live births resulting from IVF.Notably,
some associations were opposite to those seen for
successful live birth. Thus, in women who successfully have an IVF singleton live birth, the risk
of low birth weight is reduced in older compared
to younger women. Low birth weight and preterm birth are reduced when the woman’s embryo
has been used [283].
15.9.6 Sickle Cell Disease
15.9.6.1 Incidence
The incidence of AA depends on the prevalence
of SCD in different world regions. In Saudi
Arabia, the incidence is 16.9% [284]. The inci-
dence of AA is lower in a nonpregnant population
with SCD than in the general nonpregnant population [283, 285]. Also, homozygous SCD is now
widespread and has broad clinical variability.
15.9.6.2 Clinical Presentation
andLaboratory Findings
Around 75% of the SCD patients reported pain in
their RLQ [286], the same percentage as in pregnant nonsickler patients [29]. Vomiting is common (67%) [286] and is comparable to pregnant
nonsickler patients with AA [287]. Only 50% of
the AA patients had a fever, while none of the
sickler patients had pyrexia in the normal appendix group. Around 75% of the AA patients with
SCD had WBC >16,000/mm3 [286]. There is a
signicant difference in the WBC counts in AA
patients compared to those with non-inamed
appendices [27]. As with nonsickler patients,
delaying the appendectomy beyond 24h in their
third trimester is associated with gangrene and
appendiceal perforation [20, 286, 288].
15.9.6.3 Prognosis
Pregnancy in SCD patients presents a clinical
challenge as maternal mortality is 1–2% and
perinatal mortality is 5–6% [289, 290]. Maternal
mortality is rare in pregnant nonsickler patients
with AA (see Sect. 15.10.3.1), similar to SCD
patients [286]. The fetal loss and premature
delivery rates were 9 and 18%, respectively, consistent with other reports [15, 21]. The variability
of complications [291] may be due to the milder
form of SCD in the Al-Hassa area (high levels of
HbF). The high HbF levels protect against several
clinical features associated with SCD, but the
association between HbF levels and the severity
of the disease process is complex [289].
15.9.7 Appendiceal Endometriosis/
Deciduosis
15.9.7.1 Historical Considerations
During pregnancy, the ectopic decidua (deciduosis) is attributed to hormonal effects on the ectopic endometrium, namely endometriosis, or
normal subceolomic mesothelium. Karl von

402
https://t.me/medicina_free
15 Acute Appendicitis
Rokitansky rst described AE in 1860 [292].
Hirschberg, in 1905, coined the term periappen-
dicitis decidualis, describing a patient with AE
with right-sided tubal EP [293]. Sampson proposed the theory of retrograde menstruation as
the etiology for endometriosis [294] and reported
AE.Bogatko described the rst AA due to AE in
20weeks of pregnancy in 1949 with the uneventful postoperative course and later CS [295].
15.9.7.2 Incidence
Deciduosis is a benign condition not correlated
with obstetrical complications during pregnancy.
This physiological phenomenon is present in
10% of the CS on the ovary, uterine, and fallopian tube serosa and is associated with abdominal pain during pregnancy [296]. Ectopic decidua
with glands is subclassied as decidualized endometriosis, whereas, without glands, the condition
is called deciduosis.
AE is rare in the general population, occurring
in 0.2–0.3% of appendectomy specimens [297].
AE accounts for 0.0075–0.045% of extrapelvic
endometriosis [298] and 1% of pelvic endometriosis [299] in the general population. The prevalence of AE in patients with biopsy-proven
endometriosis or chronic RLQ pain is 4.1 and
3.7%, respectively [300, 301]. Pregnancy complicated with AE is rare, ranging from 3–8/10,000
deliveries [239]. There are less than 30 cases
published during pregnancy. Compared to AA,
the occurrence is higher during the third
trimester.
15.9.7.3 Risk Factors
No differences were found when age, parity, and
pregnancy duration at diagnosis were compared
for women experiencing AE and AA during pregnancy [26, 47, 302]. With pelvic endometriosis,
the odds ratio for AE was 20.9 compared to the
general population [300].
15.9.7.4 Clinical Presentation
Isolated AE in the general population is usually
asymptomatic. The lesions are discovered incidentally in appendectomy specimens or colonoscopies with an inverted or bulbous appendiceal
orice. Cyclic RLQ pain during menstruation is
typical before pregnancy. In pregnancy, the frequency of the presenting symptoms and signs,
such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and
elevated body temperature, does not differ
between acute AE and AA.Therefore, the presentation does not help establish the diagnosis
[239, 240, 294, 301, 303–320]. In contrast to AA,
the incidence of AE is much higher during the
third trimester [302].
15.9.7.5 Diagnosis
WBC counts are similar in acute AE and AA and
do not help establish the preoperative diagnosis
[239, 240, 294, 301, 304–321]. Leukocytosis due
to deciduosis (or normal pregnancy) is from the
production of granulocyte colony-stimulating
factor [322]. The gold standard to diagnose EA is
exploration, done in a standard fashion for AA
(see Sects. 15.8.2 and 15.8.3).
Histopathology gives a denitive diagnosis
(Fig.15.25).
15.9.7.6 Prognosis
The overall AE complication rate is higher than
with AA, especially during the third trimester,
partly because the incidence is the highest during
the third trimester. Intra-appendiceal decidual
cells induce a higher inammatory response
resulting in a higher occurrence of transmural
lesions, which increase the risk of perforation
[314]. Approximately 27% of cases during pregnancy were perforated, all cases during the third
trimester. There were no maternal or fetal complications in 45% of the cases [302].
15.9.8 Appendiceal Carcinoid
Even in the general population, tumors of the
appendix are rare. The most common is appendiceal carcinoid which accounts for 85% of appendiceal tumors [324], with a median age of
29.8years [325]. In 80%, the appendiceal carcinoids are incidentally discovered in the removed
organ without signs before surgery. Carcinoid
tumors are found in the general population in
0.3–0.9% of appendectomy specimens [326].
Several cases of appendiceal carcinoid in preg-

15.9 Specic Considerations
https://t.me/medicina_free
403
a
b
c
Fig. 15.25 (a) Area of deciduosis, accompanied by myx-
oid degeneration, in the subserosal layer (area marked by
arrowheads) of the tip side (bar: 2.5mm). (b) In a high-
power magnication, deciduosis comprises large polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and
nancy presented as AA [327–332]. Berriors etal.
published the rst case in 1965 [331]. The interaction between the carcinoid tumor of the appendix and pregnancy has not yet been elucidated
[329].
Postappendectomy management during pregnancy depends on (1) tumor diameter (2cm), (2)
tumor localization, (3) tumor grade and stage,
and (4) weeks of gestation.
The right hemicolectomy is indicated several
weeks after delivery if the tumor is on the appendiceal base or is >2cm [329]. If CS should be
performed due to obstetric indications, a right
hemicolectomy should be performed after CS
during the same operation.
centrally placed uniform nuclei, characteristic of decidual
cells (bar: 2.5μm). (c) Immunohistochemical evaluation
shows diffuse positivity for vimentin in the decidual cell
cytoplasm (bar: 250μm). (Reproduced with permission
from [323] under the CC Attribution License)
Medical treatment like somatostatin analogues
and avoiding conditions and substances that cause
ushing may be useful during pregnancy. (North
American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society [333])
15.9.9 Perityphlitic/
Postappendectomy Abscess
The appendiceal abscess should be drained without delay due to the high risk of rupture, especially in pregnancy. The growing uterus during
pregnancy, the contracting uterus during labor,
and the shrinking during puerperium form the

404
https://t.me/medicina_free
15 Acute Appendicitis
a
Fig. 15.26 (a) T2-weighted MRI shows hyperintense
abscess formation (arrows) posterior to the uterus. (b)
After positioning in the left lateral decubitus position, a
nonferromagnetic needle (arrows) is placed in the lesion
using balanced steady-state free precession sequences. ()
b
unstable inner boundary of the abscess, increasing the possibility of rupture [48]. The highest
risk of rupture occurs during labor when the
uterus contracts, later shrink, and has a signicant impact on disseminating pus with the possibility of contamination of the genital tract. An
abscess can be drained by radiology interventional techniques. The patient is in the left lateral
decubitus position. MRI-guided puncture through
the right psoas muscle is the only safe access to
the lesion without other interposing structures.
(Fig.15.26). After a successful puncture, pus is
aspirated and sent to microbiology. The resolution of an abscess can be re-evaluated with MRI
[334].
c
After catheter placement, diluted gadobutrol was instilled
in the abscess (arrows) via the drainage catheter (arrow-
heads) to evaluate the completeness of drainage.
(Reproduced with permission from [334])
lize the minimal intra-abdominal pressure
necessary for adequate exposure. Although evidence suggests a fascial separation occurs early,
it remains to be seen what long-term status
these incisions will achieve. No hernia has
developed in these patients with a follow-up of
5.5years [335].
15.10 Prognosis
The mortality of appendicitis complicating pregnancy and the puerperium is the mortality of delay.
(Edmund Adam Babler, 1908)
15.9.10 Puerperium
The unique consideration in the postpartum
patient is the presence of a healing abdominal
incision after CS.There are no studies on outcomes for recent abdominal incisions subjected
to early pneumoperitoneum. Commonly, pneumoperitoneum is limited to 10 mmHg in CS
patients. This prevents undue mechanical strain
on the healing wound, though there were no
controls for comparison with the standard pressures (15–16mmHg). It seems prudent to uti-
15.10.1 Conservative Treatment
Previous studies of conservative treatment
found a signicant increase in maternal morbidity—septic shock (6.3×), peritonitis (1.6×),
venous thromboembolism (2×) [34], and perinatal adverse events—preterm labor and spontaneous abortion [195]. This was not conrmed in
the largest population-based study [194]. The
higher maternal mortality rate was found in
nonoperated pregnant patients [336], although a
recent study was without maternal mortality
[42]. There was no signicant difference in ges-

15.10 Prognosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
405
tational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth
weight, and APGAR scores between conservatively and operatively treated groups [42]. The
most recent population- based study did not nd
a higher fetal loss rate (5%). The authors claim
no recurrence of AA before fetal losses. They
concluded that the fetal loss might have occurred
due to other causes [194]. Gestational age and
maternal age are two major risk factors for fetal
loss. Therefore, these two factors should be
included when comparing treatment outcomes
for fetal loss. Potentially, the bias results from
lower degrees of appendiceal inammation
treated nonoperatively and included patients
without AA.
15.10.2 Perforation Rate
Previously, the perforation rate in pregnancy has
been reported as high as 55–60% compared to
4–19% in the general population [38, 45, 208,
220, 337]. Up to 1908, the perforation rate was
64% [338]. When the operation is delayed >24h,
a perforation rate is 66% compared to 0% with
the operation <24h after the presentation [45].
The timing of intervention varies by trimester:
90% in the rst trimester undergo the operation
within 24h of the onset of symptoms. In the third
trimester, up to 64% have symptoms >48h before
operation [109, 339]. Diagnostic and therapeutic
delay >48h is more common during labor and
the early puerperium [50, 340–342]. Perforation
increases the risk of generalized peritonitis
because the omentum cannot isolate the infection
[46]. Diagnostic and therapeutic delay is more
common during the early puerperium due to the
following:
• Painful and prolonged labor masks symptoms
of AA,
• Epidural analgesia during labor suppresses
symptoms of AA,
• Abdominal pain affects up to 98% of postpartum women [343, 344],
• Leukocytosis and fever are especially exaggerated in the early puerperium.
The trend in the perforation rate is decreasing
from 25–29% [80, 345] to 15–20% during the
last several decades [24, 34]. The perforation rate
through the trimesters increases: 6–8.7%,
10–12.5%, and 13–26.1%, respectively [24, 47].
In summary, the causes for the treatment delay
include [50, 109, 229, 339, 340] the following:
• Atypical clinical picture when observation delays the intervention,
• Time delay during consultations if
departments/institutions are dislocated,
• Time delay during the patient transfer if
departments/institutions are dislocated,
• Third trimester, painful labor and early
puerperium,
• Epidural analgesia during labor suppresses the symptoms of AA,
• Lower CT use during pregnancy.
15.10.3 Maternal Outcome
15.10.3.1 Maternal Mortality
Before 1900, maternal mortality was 30%; with
perforation operated even without delay, it was
up to 58% [56, 346], while up to 100% when diffuse peritonitis was present [337, 347]. Up to
1908, maternal mortality was 24%, but 45% with
diffuse peritonitis [348]. Since 1950, mortality
has decreased partly due to the introduction of
antibiotics. In 1947, maternal mortality was lowered to 0.71% when the disease was conned to
the appendix, 30% with peritonitis, and 50%
when perforated [349]. In 1954, cases occurring
in the last 3months of pregnancy showed a mortality of 20.7% [350]. Until 1992, appendiceal
perforation had maternal mortality up to 4%
compared to <1% in non-perforated AA [345].
Today, overall, maternal mortality is <1% [27–
29, 46], or even 0% even with perforated AA [80,
244, 351]. It is rare in the rst trimester and
increases with advancing gestational age due to
the prolonged period between admission and
operation in the third trimester [46, 109, 252].
For comparison, with MD during pregnancy

406
https://t.me/medicina_free
15 Acute Appendicitis
(patients since 1949 included), maternal mortality was 17% [124]. In all deceased patients, MD
perforation was present [124]. The likelihood of
maternal death in the USA is higher in the nonHispanic black population compared to the nonHispanic white population and Hispanics (OR:
4.42 vs. 4.04 vs. 3.62, respectively) [39]. This
could be explained by underlying preexisting
conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, and cardiac conditions.
Adverse maternal (and fetal outcomes) are
associated with [21, 39, 45, 151] the following:
• A delay in surgery (>24h after onset of
symptoms),
• Appendiceal perforation,
• Maternal temperature>38°C,
• Leukocytosis >16,000/mm3,
• Non-Hispanic black population (USA).
15.10.3.2 Maternal Morbidity
Increased maternal morbidity associated with AA
was partly due to the increased peritonitis rate
[207]. Maternal morbidity with LA is the same
[195] or less [233] compared to OA.The advantages of laparoscopy include (1) decreased surgical trauma with lesser use of analgesics, especially
opioids that can lead to fetal depression, (2)
decreased gravid uterine manipulation, (3) minimal use of electrosurgery in the proximity of the
uterus, (4) earlier recovery of bowel function with
shorter time to oral intake and therefore less nutritional stress to the fetus, (5) early mobilization
with a lesser risk of thromboembolic risk associated with pregnancy, (6) shorter postoperative
length of stay in the hospital, and (7) faster return
to daily activities [151, 195, 225, 227, 236, 352–
354]. Sometimes, a similar hospital length of stay
after OA and LA is because the LA group is hospitalized for fetal surveillance, not maternal postoperative surveillance [233]. LA in pregnancy is
safe and effective, without any long-term effects
on the mother [355].
CS rates are similar in pregnant populations
with and without AA, consistent with teaching
promoting CS only for obstetric indications
[207]. The degree of appendiceal inammation
does not inuence the type of delivery at term,
with half of the patients having CS and another
half having vaginal delivery in both nonperforated and perforated groups [93]. However,
the rate of CS is almost doubled in the presence
of peritonitis. This likely reects the increased
severity of maternal illness and possible fetal
compromise requiring (1) an appendectomy with
simultaneous delivery or preterm delivery early
after appendectomy [74, 207]. Approximately
12% underwent CS as the mode of delivery and
7% at the time of appendectomy [24].
15.10.4 Fetal Outcome
15.10.4.1 General Considerations
The effects of any medical intervention on fetal
mortality must be considered in the context of
certain preexisting background risks common to
all pregnancies. These include a 3% risk of birth
defects, 15% for miscarriage, 4% for prematurity,
4% for growth retardation, and 1% for mental
retardation or neurological developmental problems. A variety of non-obstetric surgical interventions resulted in a spontaneous miscarriage
(5.8%), premature delivery (8.2%), and major
birth defects (2%) [102].
Surgery (appendectomy) and general anesthesia are not signicant risk factors for
spontaneous abortion and do not increase
the risk of major birth defects, even during
the rst trimester.
15.10.4.2 Historical Perspective
In the nineteenth century, many pregnant
patients with AA presented with the consequences of advanced intraperitoneal inammation. In that period, miscarriage and preterm
labor resulted in fetal mortality of 100% [103,
104, 356]. Fetal mortality was higher in the
years before 1990 when the current possibilities
offered by modern neonatology, fast and accurate (imaging) diagnostic workup, intensive
care, and antibiotic therapy were limited or not
available. Abrahams, in 1897, collected 15 cases

15.10 Prognosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
407
from the literature and stated that the fetal mortality in cases of perforative AA during pregnancy, even when operated upon without delay,
was up to 90% [56]. Until 1908, fetal mortality
was 40%. Edmund Adam Babler concluded that
“the mortality of appendicitis complicating
pregnancy is the mortality of delay” [348]. This
statement was published several years earlier by
Heaton [53]. Until 1973, fetal mortality was
20% (perforated AA 30% and non-perforated
AA 3%) and seemed to be related to the severity
of the disease rather than the period of gestation
[244].
15.10.4.3 Fetal Mortality
Without appendiceal perforation, fetal mortality
is 0–5% [22, 24, 40, 69, 80, 93, 351], while perforation raises fetal mortality to 10–36% [24, 27,
28, 69, 80, 93, 351]. For a comparison, fetal mor-
tality of 13.6% (1949–2005) was found when
MD in pregnancy was the cause of acute abdomen [124].
Apart from premature labor, the risk of intrauterine fetal death increases if the infant remains
in utero in the presence of peritonitis. One reason
is the rare incidence of infection-induced placental abruption (see Sect. 4.7.2). Another is high
pyrexia and bacterial toxemia (see Chap. 4). The
adjusted odds for fetal loss increased signicantly for the non-Hispanic black population
with AA in the USA. They were about three
times as likely to experience fetal death as the
non-Hispanic black population without the disease [39].
15.10.4.4 Fetal Morbidity
Approximately 17% of women with AA deliver
in the same admission, with a 3× increase in preterm birth [207]. Unexplained antepartum hemorrhage was 4×, and placental abruption was 2×
more likely with AA.The systemic inammation
associated with AA and the proximity of the
appendix to the uterus may lead to transuterine
neutrophil and inammatory cytokine inltration
(chorion and amnion) and lead to placental
abruption or preterm birth [207]. Premature rupture of membranes and postpartum hemorrhage
were less common in AA patients, and the CS
rate was similar [207]. Notably, there was no
increase in intrauterine death, and infants were
less likely to be small for gestational age. Preterm
birth in Columbia is 12% [219, 357].
The risk of appendiceal perforation increases
with gestational age, and perforation in the third
trimester often results in preterm labor [46].
Patients with peritonitis are more likely to deliver
preterm and by CS [207]. Appendectomy in the
third trimester has a 1.6× greater risk of preterm
birth than in the rst or second trimesters and a
3.4× greater likelihood of birth at gestational
ages <33weeks [219].
In patients with uncomplicated AA, rates of
preterm delivery rate (7.7%) were within the
range of the total preterm delivery rate (10.9%),
while the rate of preterm delivery with MD was
26% [124]. Compared to the general rate of preterm birth of 7.7–12.3%, appendectomy during
pregnancy did not signicantly increase preterm
delivery [37, 358, 359]. Others claim a signicantly higher preterm delivery rate (10.9%) in
patients with AA in comparison with normal
pregnancy (4.4%) [195]. The summary of fetal
outcomes is [13, 22, 26, 27, 207, 208, 219]:
• The increase in preterm delivery:
– During the rst week after appendec-
tomy (>23weeks gestation),
– Age over 35,
– BMI greater than 30,
– Peritonitis,
• The decrease in mean birth weight at
term (<3000g or even 2500g),
• An increase in live-born infants dying
within 7days of birth,
• An increase in APGAR <7,
• No increase in stillborn infants,
• No increase in congenitally malformed
infants,
• Negative appendectomy with positive
uterine pathology/inammation carries
a signicantly higher incidence of fetal
loss and early delivery.
In the USA (2000–2016), LA was associated
with a lower preterm labor risk than OA.On the
other hand, no difference in the risks of abortion

408
https://t.me/medicina_free
and CS between LA, OA, and conservative treatment was observed [194]. Conservative treatment
was associated with a lower risk of preterm labor
by 60% compared to OA [194]. Another
population- based study showed that infants of
patients with AA were less likely to be growth
restricted at the time of birth, which is in contrast
to previous reports of the increased risk of fetal
weights <3000g [22] or even <2500g [13]. The
study evaluated only patients who delivered in
the context of an AA.There was no opportunity
for placental insufciency to develop or for the
fetus to be exposed to the inammatory environment and develop possible associated sequelae,
such as growth restriction over the remainder of
the pregnancy. If the authors had been able to follow patients who developed AA and delivered
later, the fetal weight at birth would be more
helpful in determining the impact of AA on intrauterine growth. Furthermore, as only 1% of pregnancies with AA were complicated by growth
restriction, this raises the possibility of a coding
error and missing data.
15.10.4.5 Negative Appendectomy
The issue raised was the rate of increased fetal
loss after the appendectomy of a normal appendix. Fetal loss rate within 30days and preterm
delivery of 2–4% for both NA and non-perforated
AA was reported [208, 223, 247, 360]. These
percentages are even lower than in the nonoperated pregnant population [361–363].
Therefore, it is questionable that NA causes
adverse perinatal results [176, 247]. Long-term
follow-up after an appendectomy did not increase
perinatal and intrauterine deaths in the total (normal) pregnant population [45, 252]. Other studies
have limitations because only fetal demise and
early delivery occur during the hospitalization for
appendectomy.
The same percentage in NAR and simple AA
can be explained by other inammatory causes
(15%) found with NA [208, 360]. Also, some
studies did not exclude patients with a previous
history of (multiple) spontaneous abortions as
confounding factors.
15 Acute Appendicitis
The underlying (inammatory) pathology,
not (the type of) procedure, inuences fetal
risk rates. Without other pathology during
NA, there is no increase in the fetal loss
rate.
If there was an effect of surgical trauma on the
fetoplacental-uterine elements, it should have
ceased approximately 1week after the appendectomy of uncomplicated cases [22, 27]. In one
study with NA, those without further surgery
were considerably more likely to continue their
pregnancy undisturbed than those who proceeded
with appendectomy (89% versus 57%, respectively) [244]. The week following surgery, this
increased risk of delivery was present when performed after 23 weeks of gestation [26]. Any
complication and increased risk of preterm delivery after that period in a patient without surgical
complications should not be related to the operation itself [22, 27]. The premature delivery rate
was often omitted in reports on AA, but it ranges
from 15–45% [21, 108, 364]. It is now believed
that subclinical IAI is a cause of preterm premature rupture of membranes or preterm labor and,
as such, contributes to the leading cause of infant
morbidity and mortality complications from prematurity (see Chap. 4).
There are still conclusion issues [360]. First,
some authors included adverse perinatal outcomes after 30days post-surgery. Many patients
had a history of previous multiple spontaneous
abortions and should be excluded from this analysis. Second, without intraoperative pathology, the
patients’ abdominal pain could indicate a pregnancy-related complication that caused the fetal
demise. Third, in pregnant patients who underwent an NA, the percentage of LA was greater
than in those with inamed or perforated AA,
which may account for this observation. Fourth,
NA was present most frequently during the rst
trimester. Generally, the incidence of miscarriage
is highest in the rst trimester (10–15%) than in
the 2nd (up to 5%) or third trimester (<1%) [365].

References
https://t.me/medicina_free
409
15.10.4.6 Open Vs. Laparoscopic
Approach
Spirtos etal. conducted one of the rst studies on
LA inuence on fetal outcome in 1987. All pregnant patients were in the rst trimester, with no
fetal losses [5]. All four systematic reviews [366]
reported a signicantly higher fetal loss rate after
LA than OA but included a different number of
studies. However, all four systematic reviews
reported that a survey by McGory et al. [208]
predominantly affected the result because of its
size. It included more than half of the total participants in all studies. That study is databaserelated with many limitations. Fetal loss in all
four systematic reviews indicated that only
McGory etal. have shown that LA is signicantly
worse than OA for fetal loss. The remaining studies have shown no signicant difference between
the two operative approaches for this outcome.
LA does have a higher fetal loss rate than
OA [366–368].
15.10.4.7 Conversion
fromLaparoscopic toOpen
Approach
Caution should be present because of the small
number of patients that have undergone such
conversions [369]. Theoretically, if the conversion is indicated, then mostly (1) the anatomy is
complex, or (2) the inammation is advanced in
the form of perforation or an abscess. Both situations result in a longer operative time and a
higher incidence of uterine manipulation, potentially leading to a higher rate of complications.
Current studies show a low (1%) rate of conversion to laparotomy that is better than most published rates of nonpregnant patients [223]. It
may reect that the LA in pregnancy is usually
performed by experienced surgeons [223, 224].
The conversion rate to the open approach is 14%,
associated with 50% of preterm labor and no
fetal loss [235, 370].
15.10.4.8 Long-Term Outcome
In most reports, the length of fetal follow-up is
not dened or stated as “uneventful” [222]. Even
with follow-up, no specic tests for child development were mentioned [354]. LA in pregnancy
is safe and efcacious, without any long-term
effects on the fetus or resulting child [371].
Studies with both laparoscopic and OA did not
nd developmental delays in children up to
9years old, regardless of the trimester [227, 372].
Children may demonstrate the acquisition of
developmental skills at varying rates. However,
all children had a normal motor, sensory, and
social development by age 3. No long-term fetal
effects were noticed on gravid ewes after CO2
pneumoperitoneum [389].
References
1. File:Henry Hancock. Lithograph by T.H. Maguire,
1849. Wellcome V0002559.jpg - Wikimedia
Commons [Internet]. https://commons.wikime-
dia.org/wiki/File:Henry_Hancock._Lithograph_
by_T._H._Maguire,_1849._Wellcome_V0002559.
jpg. Accessed 19 Nov 2022.
2. Hancock H.Disease of the appendix caeci cured by
operation. Lancet. 1848;52:380–2.
3. Peterson R. A case of appendicitis occurring on
the seventh day following labor; rupture into the
bowel; recovery. Medical News, Philadelphia.
1893;42:515–7.
4. Mundé P.Premature delivery of a dead child, induced
by acute appendicitis, with remarks on appendicitis
in women. Med Rec. 1894;46:678–9.
5. Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Spirtos TW, Poliakin RI,
Hibbard LT.Laparoscopy-A diagnostic aid in cases
of suspected appendicitis. Its use in women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:90–4.
6. Paddock C.Pregnancy complicated by appendicitis.
Am J Obstet. 1913;68:401–19.
7. Mussey R. Operations of necessity during pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1927;2:729–36.
8. Douglas PL. In: Douglas PL, editor. Report on
maternal morbidity and mortality in Scotland.
London: HMSO; 1935. p.73.
9. Child RG. Surgical problems arising during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1944;47:213–28.
10. Sprong WF.Acute appendicitis complicating pregnancy. Calif Med. 1959;91:258–60.
11. Taylor J. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy and
the puerperium. A N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.
1972;12:202–5.

410
https://t.me/medicina_free
15 Acute Appendicitis
12. Aird I, editor. Companion in surgical studies. 2nd ed.
Edinburgh: E. & S.Livingstone; 1958. p.51.
13. Wei JJ, Liang HH, Lin HC. Acute appendicitis
and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide
population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg.
2012;16:1204–11.
14. Agholor L, Okonofua F.Rate of negative appendectomy in pregnant women in Benin City. Nigeria J
Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:1540–8.
15. Eryilmaz M, Bas G, etal. Acute appendicitis during
pregnancy. Dig Surg. 2002;19:40–4.
16. Al-Qudah M, Sroujieh A, etal. Appendectomy in
pregnancy: the experience of a university hospital. J
Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;19:362–4.
17. Unal SE, Ozel L, etal. Acute abdomen in pregnancy
requiring surgical management: a 20-case series. Eur
J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:87–90.
18. Retzke H, Schmidt M.Appendizitis in graviditate.
Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123:61–5.
19. Jr Bailey RK, Miller SF, Jones LM.Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am Surg. 1986;52:218–21.
20. Gomez M.Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am
J Surg. 1979;137:180–3.
21. Horowitz GA, Santiesteban R, Burkett G. Acute
appendicitis during pregnancy. Diagnosis and management. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1362–7.
22. Mazze B. Appendectomy during pregnancy: a
Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol.
1991;77:835–40.
23. Sivanesaratnam V. The acute abdomen and the
obstetrician. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol. 2000;14:89–102.
24. Ueberrueck A, Meyer L, etal. Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during
pregnancy. World J Surg. 2004;28:508–11.
25. Kazim KM.Appendicitis in pregnancy: experience
of thirty-eight patients diagnosed and managed
at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Int J Surg.
2009;7:365–7.
26. Mourad JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis
in pregnancy: new information that contradicts
long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2000;182:1027–9.
27. Hee L. The diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcome after appendectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1999;65:129–35.
28. Al-Mulhim A.Acute appendicitis in pregnancy. A
review of 52 cases. Int Surg. 1996;81:295–7.
29. Andersen TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:758–62.
30. Bonfante Ramírez A, Bolaños Ancona R, Juárez
Garcia L, Castelazo Morales E.Appendicitis during
pregnancy. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1998;66:126–8.
31. Duqoum W. Appendicitis in pregnancy. East
Mediterr Health JJ. 2001;7:642–5.
32. Barros Fde JR, Jdo A RF.Acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Rev Paul Med. 1991;109:9–13.
33. Zingone AA, Humes DJ, West J. Risk of acute
appendicitis in and around pregnancy: a population-
based cohort study from England. Ann Surg.
2015;261:332–7.
34. Abbasi V, Abenhaim HA. Management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnancy—
population- based study of over 7000 cases. BJOG.
2014;121:1509–14.
35. Raja NB, Iqbal J.Appendicitis in pregnancy. Rawal
Med J. 2003;28:52–5.
36. Butte MF, Fernández F, etal. Appendectomies for
suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy:
Experience at a Chilean public hospital. Rev Med
Chil. 2006;134:145–51.
37. Maslovitz G, Lessing JB, etal. The signicance of
clinical signs and blood indices for the diagnosis
of appendicitis during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet
Invest. 2003;56:188–91.
38. Brennan AL. Postpartum abdominal pain. Ann
Emerg Med. 1989;18:83–9.
39. Dongarwar D, Taylor J, Ajewole V, Anene N,
Omoyele O, Ogba C, et al. Trends in appendicitis among pregnant women, the risk for cardiac
arrest, and maternal–fetal mortality. World J Surg.
2020;44(12):3999–4005.
40. Babaknia H, Woodruff JD. Appendicitis during
pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;50:40–4.
41. Addiss DG, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United
States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–25.
42. Liu J, Ahmad M, Wu J, Tong XJ, Zeng HZ, Chan
FSY, etal. Antibiotic is a safe and feasible option
for uncomplicated appendicitis in pregnancy—a
retrospective cohort study. Asian J Endosc Surg.
2020;14(2):207–12.
43. Lee SH, Lee JY, Choi YY, Lee JG. Laparoscopic
appendectomy versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Surg.
2019;19(1):41.
44. Cunningham JH. Appendicitis complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;45:415–20.
45. Tamir FS, Klein SR.Acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg. 1990;160:571–6.
46. Tracey HS. Appendicitis in pregnancy. Am Surg.
2000;66:555–60.
47. Andersson M.Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1281–5.
48. Findley P. Appendicitis complicating pregnancy.
JAMA. 1912;59:612–4.
49. Lehner B, Stengg K, et al. Premature labor in
a women with perforating appendicitis at 36
weeks of gestation. A case report. J Reprod Med.
2002;47:327–8.
50. Munro PF. Abdominal surgical emergencies in the
puerperium. BMJ. 1975;20:691–4.
51. DeLee J. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy with at
term. Surg Clin North Am. 1921;1:1003–12.
52. Erbes J. Appendicitis complicating pregnancy.
1939.
53. Heaton G. Some peculiarities of appendicitis in the female sex, with special reference to
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
