Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 220 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
86 Мб
Скачать
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
10 Uterine Rupture andPerforation
for UR. One trial of second-trimester abortion using misoprostol in 720 women with one or more previous CS concluded that misoprostol was not associated with an excess of complica­tions compared with women with unscarred uteri [233].
Uterine Curettage
See Sect. 18.3.
Salpingectomy
The ectopic pregnancy site, type, and quality of suture material, suturing technique, mono- or bipolar electrocautery, and the gynecologist’s experience inuence outcomes after laparoscopic Fallopian tube resection [234, 235].
To decrease the risk of long-term complica­tions from a ruptured tubal pregnancy localized near the cornual region, using additional rein­forcing sutures during laparoscopy appears to be more appropriate management than electrosur­gery alone since cautery-induced thermal injury may compromise the myometrial tissue [236]. However, additional sutures in the cornual region may be associated with a risk of myometrial isch­emia. Therefore extensive suturing should be avoided. For unruptured tubal pregnancy, conser­vative therapy with methotrexate or laparoscopic salpingostomy is the methods of choice (see Sect.
9.1.7.3) that can prevent severe complications in
subsequent gestations [237].
Apart from the surgical approach, the time between the surgical removal of a Fallopian tube and conception is important. It was <12months in 67% of the analyzed URs in the group of non­ectopic pregnancies. Interstitial pregnancy was the cause in all cases. However, it is impossible to determine the safe interval between conception and salpingectomy with a high degree of cer­tainty, and the risk of UR during subsequent pregnancy cannot be excluded entirely after sev­eral years [238].
Uterine Artery Embolization
Except for uterine artery embolization, described cases with UR had additional risk factors for which uterine artery embolization was indicated. Most include (resected) uterine myomas or
abnormal placentation during pregnancy with UR [239241].
10.1.6 Prevention
10.1.6.1 Scarred Uterus
The most direct prevention strategy for minimiz­ing the risk of pregnancy-related UR after CS is to minimize the number of patients at the highest risk. The salient variable is the threshold for a tol­erable risk. Although this choice is arbitrary, the safety threshold is 0.5% (1/200). Therefore, the categories of patients that exceed this critical value are those with previous:
• Multiple CS,
• Classic midline CS,
• Low-vertical CS,
• Low-transverse CS with a single-layer hyster­otomy closure,
• CS with an interdelivery interval of <2years,
• Low-transverse CS with a congenitally abnor­mal uterus,
• CS without a previous history of a successful vaginal birth,
• CS with either labor induction or augmentation,
• CS in a woman carrying a macrosomic fetus weighing >4000g,
• Uterine myomectomy.
Accurate prediction of UR would be extremely
valuable, as it would allow women at low risk to proceed with a TOL, whereas women at high risk for UR could undergo a planned CS.Thinning in the lower uterine segment measured by US pre­dicts UR’s complete rupture or scar dehiscence at birth during TOLAC.A full lower uterine segment thickness cutoff of 3.1–5.1mm and a myometrium thickness cutoff of 2.1–4.0mm provided a strong negative predictive value for the occurrence of a defect during TOLAC.A myometrium thickness cutoff between 0.6 and 2.0mm provided a strong positive predictive value for the occurrence of a defect [242]. The interobserver agreement is that the lower uterine segment thickness should be measured by transvaginal US [243].
10.1 Spontaneous Uterine Rupture
https://t.me/medicina_free
271
10.1.7 Clinical Presentation
The prevalence of Müllerian duct malformations in the general population and the population of fertile women is estimated to be 4.3%, and in infertile patients, approximately 25%. The sep­tate uterus is the most common anomaly (35%), followed by the bicornuate uterus (25%) and the arcuate uterus (20%) [244]. These malformations remain asymptomatic until the patient reaches reproductive age. Such anomalies result in an increased rate of infertility, miscarriage, recur­rent pregnancy loss, preterm labor, and other obstetric complications. Clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic to vague complaints of mild lower abdominal pain with gastrointestinal upset and its severest form of acute abdomen with hemorrhagic shock. Women with a noncom­municating uterine horn may present after men­arche with progressive abdominal pain caused by hematometra, hematosalpinx, and endometriosis. However, many women remain asymptomatic.
10.1.7.1 Symptoms
The symptoms and signs of UR largely depend on [22] the following:
• Time of occurrence (pregnancy, early or late labor),
• Cause,
• Duration,
• Site,
• Type,
• Degree,
• Extent,
• The amount of intraperitoneal spill,
• The size of the blood vessels involved,
• Complete or partial extrusion of the fetus and placenta,
• The intensity of retraction of the uterine muscle.
Sudden, severe, shearing abdominal pain with the absence of fetal heart sounds, cessation of uterine contractions, and recession of a present-
ing part, combined with vaginal bleeding and shock, is a classical presentation [154]. Overall, only 45% of the cases reviewed have typical symptoms and signs of UR [39, 45, 54, 154, 159,
245248]. The most common presentation is
fetal distress, mainly as a nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern with variable deceleration at a time in labor when they are not characteristically seen [82, 154]. Fetal distress occurs in 81% before abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding [182].
Pregnancy
Common symptoms and signs are abdominal pain and tenderness, shock (faintness, pallor, and tachy­cardia), vaginal bleeding, fetal distress, manifested by fetal bradycardia, absence of fetal movement, undetectable fetal heartbeat, palpable fetal body parts, cessation of contractions, and signs of intra­peritoneal bleeding. Severe abdominal pain is present in 14% of patients, shock in 10–21.3%, bleeding in 16.8%, the disappearance of fetal heart sounds in 8.9%, and cessation of contractions in
5.6% [149, 247]. Epigastric pain, shoulder pain (right-sided or bilateral), abdominal distention and paralytic ileus, hypertonic uterus, altered uterine contour, and uid thrill are less commonly associ­ated with UR. Hematuria and vernixuria (vernix caseosa in urine) are additional signs resulting from a rupture extension to the bladder [249].
Labor andPostpartum
UR during labor is associated with cessation of labor pain, the recession of presenting fetal body parts, cervical lacerations, and vaginally palpable uterine defects. One of the pathognomonic signs of constriction–ring dystocia is that, despite a painful, colicky contraction originating and felt in the upper part of the uterus, no impulse of descent or pressure is imparted to the presenting fetal head below. Downward contractile impulse is cut off by the gap in the continuity of the mus­cle bers at the rupture site. After rupture, the uterus continues to contract above, but the fetal head below remains immobile to the examining nger during a contraction [22]. This phenome­non partly depends on the degree and extension of UR and the associated partial or complete expulsion of the fetus in the peritoneal cavity.
272
https://t.me/medicina_free
10 Uterine Rupture andPerforation
The most common sign is the sudden appear­ance of fetal distress during labor. Up to 81% of patients with UR during labor have evidence of fetal distress before bleeding or abdominal pain [182] and fetal heart abnormalities in 43.5% [57]. The observation of sudden fetal heart irregularity in laboring women is a dangerous sign [70].
Postpartum bleeding is present in 24%, while postpartum abdominal pain, distention, and ileus are present in 14% [149]. A large blood clot evac­uated with the spontaneous exit of the placenta, especially in patients on uterotonics or prosta­glandins for induction of labor, should raise the suspicion of UR [109]. Another suspicious sign is bloodstained liquor after the rupture of mem­branes [187].
Scarred Uterus
The symptoms and signs of UR in patients with scarred uterus differ from patients without a uter­ine scar [246]. UR at a previous uterine scar site is typically less violent and dramatic than a spon­taneous or traumatic UR because of its relatively reduced vascularity. Hypogastric tenderness is the most common sign in women with a previous uterine scar. In women without a scar, shock is the most common sign, followed by uterine bleeding, severe abdominal pain, and easily pal­pable fetal parts. Severe abdominal pain is com­mon in both groups of women with and without a uterine scar.
present in 4.5% [247]. Cases that presented as puerperal sepsis have shown to be unrecognized UR.
Silent antepartum UR is usually associated with a previous uterine scar from CS, myomec­tomy, or uterus perforation at the time of curet­tage. Antenatal spontaneous silent rupture of the intact uterus is exceptionally rare [162, 169, 250,
251], without predilection of UR location. High
parity is common.
Delayed Presentation
Delayed presentation with abdominal pain and minimal or absent other symptoms and signs is possible if the UR is “covered.” The rupture site may be covered from the outside by the small [252] or large intestine [253] or from the inside by fetal legs [254], preventing massive bleeding. Therefore, vital signs and laboratory data could be stable. The external covering of UR may pre­vent amniotic rupture or amniotic cavity protru­sion, explaining the initial absence of a fetal heart rate pattern indicative of cord issues (Fig.10.11).
Another delayed presentation is during early postpartum. The condition is not suspected or diagnosed until the patient has become estab­lished upon slow but progressive postpartum bleeding. The UR, which does not cause symp­toms until the early postpartum period, is impor-
Incomplete andSilent Rupture
At rst, quiet, silent, or occult rupture occurs without the symptoms and signs ordinarily asso­ciated with UR. Diagnosis may be difcult or unduly delayed, and unless the possibility of UR is suspected, it may be missed. In quiet rupture, there is the uncomplaining multipara in labor or the patient whose CS scar is stretching and nally yields in either pregnancy or labor. Nothing dra­matic happens, but an increase in the pulse rate, pallor, perhaps slight vaginal bleeding, and the patient complains of some pain is present. Contractions may continue unaltered, but the cer­vix fails to dilate further—an essential sign [22]. Uterine tenderness on internal examination is present [250]. UR as the incidental nding is
Fig. 10.11 Defect of the posterior wall of the uterus adhered to the sigmoid colon, hematoma on mesentery, and active bleeding on the rupture site. (Reproduced with permission from [253] under the CC BY 4.0)
10.1 Spontaneous Uterine Rupture
https://t.me/medicina_free
273
tant because traumatic bleeding may be attributed to atony of the uterus and collapse to so-called obstetrical shock [22].
Epidural/Spinal Anesthesia
Epidural analgesia rarely masks the symptoms and signs of UR [60, 182, 255]. The sudden development of “breakthrough pain” under epi­dural analgesia may improve the specicity of abdominal pain as a symptom of UR in patients attempting vaginal birth after previous uterine surgery [82].
10.1.7.2 Physical Examination
A physical examination reveals tenderness in the middle of the lower abdomen with or without guarding. Vaginal bleeding can be present. Blood pressure depends on the severity of uterine bleed­ing, and the patient can be hypotensive with an increased pulse rate. A lump (expelled fetus) could be palpated in a hospitalized patient with new-onset UR without the presenting part [154]. Shoulder pain (Kehr’s sign) is a valuable sign of intraperitoneal blood in the subdiaphragmatic region. Even a small amount can cause this symp­tom, but it is important to realize that it may be 24 h or longer after the bleeding has occurred before blood will track up under the diaphragm. Also, some acute massive intraperitoneal bleed­ing may not initially have shoulder pain. Sooner or later, however, shoulder pain will usually appear. In doubtful cases with slow intraperito­neal bleeding for 2 or 3days, such referred pain has great diagnostic value.
With sufcient cervical dilation, a vaginal examination may reveal intestinal loops, parts of the greater omentum in the uterine cavity, or a defect of the (lower) uterine segment [109, 256]. Considerable abdominal distension compressing the thoracic cavity results in dyspnea. Postpartum fever 38 °C after CS is associated with an increased risk of UR during a subsequent trial of labor [257]. Antepartum hemorrhage (APH) often indicates UR [33] and may be associated with shoulder tip pain due to hemoperitoneum. APH is present in 33% of posterior URs [32]. With posterior UR, bleeding may be concealed, where signs of hypovolemia develop, with a
large, concealed hemoperitoneum [29, 30]. Maternal pulse and blood pressure could remain within normal limits despite massive UR, dem­onstrating the potentially misleading capacity for compensation in an otherwise t patient. Women reported persistent abdominal pain in 33% of posterior URs [29, 32]. A hard mass can be pal­pated if the fetus is partly or entirely outside the ruptured uterus, especially if the UR is on the anterior wall [8].
10.1.8 Diagnosis
It is a worthy subject of an obstetrical truism- that is, if a multiparous patient, in pregnancy, in labour, or in the early postpartum period, should develop constitu­tional or local (abdomino-pelvic) signs and symp­toms for which there is no ready explanation, then rupture of the uterus should at least be suspected.
(John Kevin Feeney, 1956 [22])
10.1.8.1 Laboratory Findings
Only 30% of patients are diagnosed with UR pre­operatively [70, 158]. Laboratory ndings show lowered serum hemoglobin levels, and the exact value and dynamics of its decrease depend on the intensity of uterine wall bleeding. Suspicion of placenta accreta/percreta arises in the case of an unexplained elevation of alpha-fetoprotein [258].
10.1.8.2 Abdominal Ultrasound
A transvaginal and transabdominal US is helpful for the direct and indirect ndings of UR.Direct signs are a thin wall with bulging of fetal parts (Fig.10.12) or visualization of the rupture. The fetus can be partly (Fig.10.13) or entirely out of the uterus (Fig.10.14). Indirect signs include free peritoneal uid (blood), especially in the pouch of Douglas, extraperitoneal hematoma, intrauter­ine blood, empty uterus, and gestational sac above the uterus (Fig.10.15), and large uterine mass with gas bubbles [8, 259, 260]. Congenital uterine anomalies or acquired uterine changes raise the suspicion of UR.
10.1.8.3 Abdominal CT
An abdominal CT is indicated in uncertain cases such as intestinal adhesions over UR, delaying
274
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 10.12 An abdominal ultrasound of the uterine wall and the minor fetal part. A small arrow indicates a thin uterine wall, which is slightly bulging. Beneath the thin uterine wall, a minor fetal part (large arrow) is visible and palpable mass through the abdomen. (Reproduced with permission from [8] under the CC BY 2.0)
10 Uterine Rupture andPerforation
diagnosis. It is seen as a focal disruption of the myometrium with the hemoperitoneum. Other signs, as found on US (see Sect. 10.1.8.2), such as fetal parts or hemoperitoneum outside the uterus, can be visualized (Figs.10.16, 10.17, and
10.18).
10.1.8.4 Abdominal MRI
US diagnosis relies on nonspecic, secondary signs such as free uid or hematoma formation, while MRI allows the visualization of the uterine wall defect or tear with higher accuracy [262]. MRI may also be less uncomfortable for the patient with a tender abdomen.
Fig. 10.13 Unrecognized edge of the uterine rupture (diagnosed initially as synechiae (arrow) due to the his­tory of uterine curettage) and the fetal head already extruded through the uterine defect. (Reproduced with permission from [165])
Fig. 10.14 Abdominal ultrasound shows a contracted uterus with fetal extremities and amniotic sac outside the uterus. (Reproduced with permission from [259])
Fig. 10.15 Abdominal ultrasound shows a contracted uterus, endometrial stripe, and no intrauterine gestation, with the placental tissue above and bladder to the right. (Reproduced with permission from [259])
Fig. 10.16 Contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT shows a defect in the anterior wall of the uterus (arrow) and uid collection with wall enhancement and adjacent uid collection 2weeks after elective Cesarean section. (Reproduced with permission from [261])
10.1 Spontaneous Uterine Rupture
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 10.17 Axial CT of the abdomen (the same patient as in Fig.10.16) shows uid collection anterior to the uterus (arrow). (Reproduced with permission from [261])
275
Fig. 10.18 Abdominal CT shows an empty uterus (arrow) and the fetus (F) outside of the uterus, denoting uterine rupture. (Reproduced with permission from [165])
The MRI appearance consists of a focal myo­metrial defect: (1) lled with hematoma and an associated hemoperitoneum (Fig.10.19) and (2) protruding amniotic cavity (Fig. 10.20) or pro­truding placenta [264]. The characteristic sign is the shower cap sign [264]. UR is a surgical emer-
Fig. 10.19 A female in the third trimester with prior cesarean delivery. Sagittal T2WI shows a focal disruption at the uterine fundus (arrows) with associated hematoma. No part of the fetus protruded into the abdominal cavity [263]
gency, and MRI should only be considered when the diagnosis is inconclusive, and the patient is hemodynamically stable [265].
Scar dehiscence results in an extensive uid collection with air bubbles in the bladder ap as a sign of local infection. The differential diagnosis includes bladder ap hematoma, endometritis, and regular CS incision changes, better depicted with MRI than CT.MRI may provide a preopera­tive diagnosis of uterine sacculation [176] or uterine diverticulum [177].
10.1.8.5 Cardiotocography
CTG abnormalities are associated with 55–87% of URs [266]. Other recognized signs of UR include loss of station of presenting part and new inefcient contractility [267].
276
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 10.20 Abdominopelvic MRI (T2WI, coronal sec­tion) reveals a bulging amniotic cavity protruding through the defect in the uterine wall (arrows). Neither peritoneal uid nor hemoperitoneum was observed. (Reproduced with permission from [11] under the CC Attribution License). The intraoperative nding is presented in Fig.10.4
10 Uterine Rupture andPerforation
CTG is mandatory in patients with clinical
suspicion of UR because fetal distress is
the most common sign or symptom of UR
and frequently precedes any other clinical
manifestations of this complication [154].
External monitoring (external tocodynamom­eter) demonstrates the classic sign of complete loss of uterine tone. In contrast, internal monitor­ing (internal pressure transducer) demonstrates increased uterine resting tone. Both techniques reveal a stepwise gradual decrease in contraction amplitude followed by a sudden onset of pro­found and prolonged fetal bradycardia in patients with rupture of an unscarred uterus at the term— staircase sign (Fig.10.21). With internal moni- toring, the intrauterine pressure catheter does not show a complete loss of resting tone (Fig.10.22). Internal monitoring has better sensitivity for detecting fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. UR shows the persistence of uterine contractions and increased resting tone, monitored by an intra­uterine catheter—ndings not observed with external monitoring [12, 182]. However, few
Fig. 10.21 Uterine contraction pattern during rupture of an unscarred uterus at term. External cardiotocography was used for the tracing. Black arrows show the gradual decrease in the amplitude of uterine contractions (stair-
case sign). A black arrowhead with a dashed body indi­cates prolonged fetal bradycardia. (Reproduced with permission from [268])
10.1 Spontaneous Uterine Rupture
https://t.me/medicina_free
277
Fig. 10.22 Uterine contraction pattern during term rup­ture of an unscarred uterus. An intrauterine pressure cath­eter was used for the tracing. The black arrow shows the gradual decrease in the amplitude of uterine contractions
papers in the literature documented the type of uterine monitoring used. Furthermore, the uterine contraction pattern may differ depending upon the presence or absence of a uterine scar or the site and direction of rupture. Bradycardia is the most common fetal heart rate abnormality with UR [182, 269]. It may occur due to cord com­pression within the UR, loss of uterine perfusion, or placental abruption. This staircase pattern appears to be a unique combination of fetal heart rate pattern and uterine contraction pattern that may be of value in diagnosing UR.Fetal brady­cardia starts right after or several minutes after the staircase sign [268]. Intermittent fetal heart tone auscultation is mandatory while the patient is off continuous monitoring.
10.1.9 Dierential Diagnosis
Differential diagnoses in the third trimester and during delivery include placenta previa, placen­tal abruption, uterine atony, and uterine inver­sion. Moreover, any condition unrelated to pregnancy that may cause hemoperitoneum should be considered in the differential diagno­sis. Acute pubic symphysis rupture will be dis­cussed in detail.
10.1.9.1 Acute Pubic Symphysis Rupture
Incidence
The incidence of acute pubic symphysis rupture caused by pregnancy varies greatly between
(staircase sign). Black arrowheads with a dashed body indicate prolonged fetal bradycardia. The gray arrow shows an increased resting tone. (Reproduced with per­mission from [268])
1/600–1/800 [270, 271] and 1/30,000 (older and probably underdiagnosed studies). Risk factors include large fetal birth weight, prolonged labor, epidural anesthesia, nulliparity, shoulder dysto­cia [272], forceps delivery, and maternal develop­mental hip dysplasia. Even with these conditions, there is a low risk of a pubic symphysis rupture during or after labor.
Pathophysiology
The nonpregnant woman’s symphysis pubis gap is 4–5mm, and it is normal to widen 2–3mm, without discomfort, during the last trimester of pregnancy. Widening over 10mm is considered pathologic.
Mechanically, acute pubic symphysis rupture occurs when the fetus descends rapidly into the birth canal during stage 2 of labor, and the head drives into the true pelvis [271]. Despite physio­logic laxity during pregnancy, the pelvis cannot adjust quickly enough in rare cases, and the pel­vic ring begins to fail at its weakest point—the pubic symphysis.
Clinical Presentation
Acute frank pubic symphysis rupture often pres­ents as a sudden onset of severe tearing pain and a sensation of separation directly over the sym­physis at delivery or early postpartum. Pain is often immediate and preceded by a “popping” or “snapping” sensation. Other symptoms include tenderness, instability, allodynia, hyperesthesia, or hyperalgesia at and around the joint site. In addition, many women will have difculty walk­ing. The gait is described as waddling or painful
278
https://t.me/medicina_free
10 Uterine Rupture andPerforation
with the inability to stand or walk. Sometimes, it is possible to hear a clicking sound when the patient walks.
The examination may reveal (1) a palpable gap with edema or hematoma on the soft tissue overlying the symphysis pubis [273, 274], (2) anteroposterior or superoinferior displacement of the upper border of the pubic symphysis or pubic tubercle, or (3) pain during lateral to medial compression of the iliac wings or greater trochanters. One or both SI joints may be tender to palpation. The less acute presentation includes pain, weight- bearing difculty, and a waddling or wide-based gait. The patient may have a positive Patrick test—pain at the sacroil- iac joint with exion, abduction, and external rotation of the hip (with one iliac spine held in a xed position by the examiner, the woman lies in a supine position, placing her opposite heel on the ipsilateral knee with the leg falling pas­sively outward) [275].
Injuries associated with pubic symphysis rup­ture include massive bleeding, resulting in hemo­dynamic instability [276], sacroiliac dislocation [275], sacral fracture, lumbosacral plexopathy [277], and urinary bladder injury.
Diagnosis
A plain pelvic X-ray is diagnostic. Severe palpa­tory tenderness of the sacroiliac joint or plain X-ray ndings suggests a widening of the sacro­iliac joint or sacral fracture. A pelvic CT denes the extent of the injury and posterior ring involve­ment [275]. According to the clinical presenta­tion, soft tissues are evaluated with MR of the abdomen and pelvis [272].
Treatment
The rst-line treatment is a closed reduction and application of a pelvic binder. Internal surgical xation is indicated if a gap of the pubic sym­physis is >40 mm [272, 277]. Even a gap >40mm can be treated conservatively, but post­partum pelvic pain persists in most patients [277, 278]. Associated injuries are treated accordingly—sacroiliac joint disruption, vagi­nal tears, etc. Implants are removed after 6months [278].
Prognosis
The prognosis is good to excellent in most cases. All fusions heal, and symptoms improve. Radiographic loosening of implants is observed in subacute cases [279].
10.1.10 Treatment
The patient with threatened UR should be exam­ined gently but thoroughly, under anesthesia, by someone experienced enough to carry out what­ever treatment method may be indicated. If UR is not diagnosed until after delivery, the procedure depends on the extent of the laceration. The com­plete UR mandates laparotomy; a cautious plug­ging from below may be employed in partial UR.
10.1.10.1 Anesthetic andPerioperative Management
See Chap. 2.
10.1.10.2 Operative Treatment
The uniformly fatal termination in a very short space of time, of every case of rupture of the uterus that had come to my knowledge in the practice of my friends, or of my own, induced me seriously to reect what could be done, or what might be ratio­nally attempted, in these deplorable cases
(William Jackson, 1845 [148])
Around 1845, maternal and fetal mortality was near 100%, and William Jackson (an anato­mist and physiologist at the Medical Institution, Shefeld, UK) advocated surgical exploration when UR was suspected [148]. Despite this con­clusion, in 1932, Mahfouz still urged conserva­tive treatment whenever possible [280], but today the key to successful treatment is early surgical intervention.
The time available for successful interven-
tion after a frank UR and before the onset
of major fetal morbidity is only 10–37min
from fetal distress on the electronic fetal
heart rate monitor [80, 102, 269].
10.1 Spontaneous Uterine Rupture
https://t.me/medicina_free
279
After the fetus is successfully delivered, the type of surgical treatment should depend on the following factors:
• Type of UR,
• Location of UR,
• The extent of UR,
• The degree of bleeding,
• The condition of the mother,
• Future childbearing.
Suture Repair
Before deciding on the type of surgical manage­ment, all rupture locations should be dened. Most URs are at the single site, but anterior and poste­rior UR (10.7%), bladder, and vaginal involve­ments (9% and 5%, respectively) are present [43]. Uterine bleeding is more profuse when the uterine tear is longitudinal rather than transverse. “Conservative surgical management” involving uterine suture repair (Figs. 10.23 and 10.24) is reserved for the following ndings [149, 250]:
• The desire for future childbearing,
• Low-transverse UR,
• Fundal UR,
• No extension to the broad ligament, cer­vix, or paracolpos,
• Easily controllable uterine hemorrhage,
• Good general condition,
• No coagulopathy.
Suture repair is not contraindicated in the con­genitally malformed uterus [172]. Repair of a UR is achieved in 13–74% of cases [43, 60, 79, 181,
182, 282]. Suture repair carries a recurrence risk
of 4–19% in a subsequent pregnancy [14, 283,
284]. Therefore, the women with a previous
suture repair of UR should undergo an elective CS when fetal lung maturity is demonstrated [285], or the patient is hospitalized and moni­tored until 37 weeks. Then CS is performed [286]. Recommendations are not strong because there are no prospective studies.
The type and location of UR dictate the type of uterine repair. When the lower anterior uter­ine wall ruptures, the primary repair is accom­panied by hemostatic techniques such as hypogastric artery ligation [149]. The percent­age of patients with the simple repair of the uterus is signicantly higher in the scarred (90.2%) than in the unscarred uterus group (57.5%). Hysterectomy is performed in 25% of the patients with a previously unscarred uterus, signicantly higher than the 9.8% in patients with a scarred uterus [65].
However, if an obvious cause is detected dur­ing surgery, and the multiparous woman does not desire future pregnancy, or the future con­ception may be dangerous, suture repair of the rupture with tubal ligation for sterilization could be performed instead of hysterectomy [287,
288].
In most cases, simple repair of the uterine tear is repaired with a double-layer closure using con­tinuous absorbable sutures [289]. There are cases
a
Fig. 10.23 (a) The ruptured and contracted uterus during emergent exploration. (b) The uterine rupture, extending inferiorly from the left side of the previous lower segment scar. (Reproduced with permission from [259])
b