Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 220 - файл
.pdf
References
https://t.me/medicina_free
199
tumor [99]. In certain circumstances, it may be
justied to remove the tumor only and await fetal
maturation, while in some cases, chemotherapy
may even be given while awaiting pulmonary
maturation [4, 100].
8.6 Prognosis
8.6.1 Maternal Outcome
In Barrett’s series in 1913, in which expectant
tumor treatment was carried out, the maternal
mortality was 18.4%, as against 2% in patients
treated surgically [101]. Laparoscopy results in
decreased length of hospital stay, less blood loss,
and a lower incidence of postoperative complications [102].
8.6.1.1 Continuation ofPregnancy
Several possible pathophysiologic mechanisms
can interfere with the normal continuation of
pregnancy. First, it is a hormonal inuence. The
problem could arise if bilateral adnexectomy/
ovariectomy is performed. Fortunately, there are
cases with further normal pregnancy after that
procedure (see Sect. 8.5.4.2). Second, it obstructs
labor or pregnancy with the tumor or uterus
incarcerated in the pelvis. The third is a secondary infection of primary ovarian pathology.
Graefe stated that ovarian cysts produce abortions or premature labor in 14–20% of cases.
pregnancy does not improve the maternal prog-
nosis, and unilateral oophorectomy can be
employed [40].
8.6.2 Fetal Outcome
8.6.2.1 Fetal Morbidity
The laparoscopy and laparotomy do not differ
concerning the fetal outcome—fetal weight, ges-
tational age, growth restriction, infant survival,
and fetal malformations [65, 100, 103, 104].
Preterm labor is reduced with laparoscopy by
severalfold [6, 77, 87]. There is only one long-
term follow-up (1–8years) study, with 11 cases,
and no evidence of developmental or physical
abnormalities in children after acute but non-
obstetrical laparoscopic surgery during preg-
nancy [105].
8.6.2.2 Fetal Mortality
No signicant differences in fetal outcomes
exist between emergency laparotomy (fetal
mortality 18%) and scheduled laparotomy (fetal
mortality 23%) [9]. Non-emergent GLS adnexal
mass operations during the second trimester
were completed without fetal loss [106]. Fetal
loss is the same with laparoscopy and laparot-
omy [6, 87].
References
8.6.1.2 Malignant Tumors
In 21 reviewed cases by Jubb, the diagnosis was
followed by immediate laparotomy and unilateral
oophorectomy. Fourteen patients had no further
treatment. In 33% of re-explored patients, no
residual carcinoma was found. Unfortunately,
there is no record of grading of the carcinoma,
and follow-up was inadequate. Because of this,
the gure for the 5-year survival rate of nearly
60% is unreliable [35]. Creasman et al. treated
patients with stage IA ovarian carcinoma more
radically with good results at 5 years. It would
seem equally likely that the good survival rates
reected early diagnosis at routine antenatal
examinations of patients. The sacrice of the
1. Marino T, Craigo SD. Managing adnexal
masses in pregnancy. Contemp Obstet Gyneol.
2000;45:130–43.
2. Leiserowitz G, Cress R, et al. Adnexal masses in
pregnancy: how often are they malignant? Gynecol
Oncol. 2006;101:315–21.
3. Zanetta G, Mariani E, Lissoni A, Ceruti P, Trio D,
Strobelt N, etal. A prospective study of the role of
ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in
pregnancy. BJOG. 2003;110(6):578–83.
4. Schemeler W, Jeffrey PF, et al. Adnexal masses in
pregnancy: surgery compared with observation.
Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1098–103.
5. Bromley B, Benacerraf B. Adnexal masses during
pregnancy: accuracy of sonographic diagnosis and
outcome. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:447–52.
6. Webb KE, Sakhel K, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad
AZ.Adnexal mass during pregnancy: a review. Am J
Perinatol. 2015;32:1010–6.

200
https://t.me/medicina_free
8 Complex Ovarian Mass
7. Borgfeldt C, Andolf E. Transvaginal sonographic
ovarian ndings in a random sample of women
25–40 years old. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1999;13:345–50.
8. Castillo G, Alcázar JL, Jurado M.Natural history of
sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal
cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women.
Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(3):965–9.
9. Whitecar S, Higby MK, et al. Adnexal masses
in pregnancy: a review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999;181:19–24.
10. Giuntoli RLI, Vang RS, Bristow RE.Evaluation and
management of adnexal masses during pregnancy.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(3):492–505.
11. Yen SL, Murk W, etal. Risk analysis of torsion and
malignancy for adnexal masses during pregnancy.
Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1895–902.
12. Aujang ER.Giant ovarian cyst and pregnancy. Case
report and literature review. Ginecol Obstet Mex.
2011;79:235–8.
13. Suprasert S, Siriaunkgul S, et al. Ruptured mature
cystic teratomas mimicking advanced stage ovarian
cancer: a report of 2 cases study. J Med Assoc Thail.
2004;87:1522–5.
14. Cagino K, Li X, Thomas C, Delgado D, Christos
P, Acholonu U. Surgical management of adnexal
masses in pregnancy: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
2021;28(6):1171–1182.e2.
15. Hermans DC, van der Putten HWHM, etal. Adnexal
masses in pregnancy. Onkologie. 2003;26:167–72.
16. Agarwal N, Parul, Kriplani A, Bhatla N, Gupta
A.Management and outcome of pregnancies complicated with adnexal masses. Arch Gynecol Obstet.
2003;267(3):148–52.
17. Platek CE, Goldberg GL, etal. The management of
a persistent adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1996;173:1236–40.
18. Sunoo CS, Terada KY, Kamemoto LE, Hale
R.Adnexal masses in pregnancy: occurrence by ethnic group. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:38–40.
19. Boulay E, etal. Ovarian cancer complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1998;25:385–99.
20. Harlozinska JK, Rabczynski J, etal. Density distribution and antigenic characterization of cell subpopulations isolated from cystic uids of ovarian serous
neoplasms. Anticancer Res. 1989;9:161–6.
21. Platek D, Henderson C, Goldberg G.The management of a persistent adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(4):1236–40.
22. Glanc P, Salem S, Farine D.Adnexal masses in the
pregnant patient a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultras Q. 2008;24(4):225–40.
23. Capone A. Ovarian cysts complicating pregnancy.
Am J Surg. 1943;61:387–93.
24. Gofnet F.Ovarian cysts and pregnancy. J Gynecol
Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001;30:S100–8.
25. McKerron RG.Pregnancy, labour and child-bed with
ovarian tumour. London: Rebman Limited; 1903.
26. Hill DJ, Nowak A, Tush B, etal. The role of ultrasonography in the detection and management of
adnexal masses during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1998;179:703–7.
27. Yazbek R, Woelfer B, et al. The value of ultrasound visualization of the ovaries during the routine
11–14 weeks nuchal translucency scan. Eur J Obstet
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;132:154–8.
28. Huang PH, Tsai KB, Tsai EM, Su JH.Hemorrhagic
corpus luteum cyst torsion in term pregnancy: a case
report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2003;19(2):75–8.
29. Bider S, Dulitzky M, et al. Clinical, surgical and
pathologic ndings of adnexal torsion in pregnant
and nonpregnant women. Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1991;173:363–6.
30. Hibbard L. Corpus luteum surgery. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1979;135:666–70.
31. Hallatt JG, Steele CH, Snyder M.Ruptured corpus
luteum with hemoperitoneum: a study of 173 surgical cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149(1):5–9.
32. Bernhard LM, Klebba PK, Gray DL, Mutch
DG.Predictors of persistence of adnexal masses in
pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;93:585–9.
33. Peterson EC, Edmunds FT, et al. Benign cystic
teratomas of the ovary; a clinico-statistical study
of 1,007 cases with a review of the literature. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1955;70:368–82.
34. Comerci JT, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, Gregori C, Breen
JL. Mature cystic teratoma: a clinicopathologic
evaluation of 517 cases and review of the literature.
Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:22–8.
35. Jubb E. Primary carcinoma in pregnancy. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1963;85:345–54.
36. Palmer J, Vatish M, Tidy J.Epithelial ovarian cancer
in pregnancy: a review of the literature. BJOG Int J
Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:480–91.
37. Novak ER, Lambrou CD, Woodruff JD. Ovarian
tumors in pregnancy. An ovarian tumor registry
review. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;46(4):401–6.
38. Beischer BW, Fortune DW, etal. Growth and malignancy of ovarian tumours in pregnancy. Aust N Z J
Obstet Gynaecol. 1971;11:208–20.
39. Dobashi M, Isonishi S, Morikawa A, Takahashi K,
Ueda K, Umezawa S, etal. Ovarian cancer complicated by pregnancy: analysis of 10 cases. Oncol Lett.
2012;3(3):577–80.
40. Creasman F, Smith JP, et al. Carcinoma of the
ovary associated with pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol.
1971;38:111–6.
41. Sherard CA, Williams HJ, et al. Adnexal masses
and pregnancy: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2003;189:358–63.
42. Matsumoto A, Ito T, Hamaguchi F, Kasuga M,
Mikami T, Hino M, et al. Primary and recurrent
serous borderline tumors during pregnancy: a case
report and literature review. Int Cancer Conf J.
2021;10(3):160–9.
43. Behtash N, Karimi Zarchi M, Modares Gilani
M, Ghaemmaghami F, Mousavi A, Ghotbizadeh

References
https://t.me/medicina_free
201
F. Ovarian carcinoma associated with pregnancy: a
clinicopathologic analysis of 23 cases and review of
the literature. BMC Pregnan Childbirth. 2008;8:3.
44. Miyakoshi M, Gabionza D, etal. Decidualized ovarian endometriosis mimicking malignancy. Am J
Roentgenol. 1998;171:1625–6.
45. DePriest CP, et al. Ultrasound screening for the
early detection of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol.
2003;21:194s–9s.
46. Caverly C. Ovarian cyst complicating pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1931;21:566–74.
47. Noreen S, Chaudhri R, Kahloon LE, etal. A large
unilocular mucinous cystadenoma in third trimester of pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak.
2011;21:426–8.
48. Machado F, Vegas C, Leon J, Perez A, Sanchez R,
Parrilla JJ, etal. Ovarian cancer during pregnancy:
analysis of 15 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:446.
49. Hertzberg MA, Bowie JD, etal. Adnexal ring sign
and hemoperitoneum caused by hemorrhagic ovarian cyst: pitfall in the sonographic diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Radiol. 1999;173:1301–2.
50. Fiegler M, Kaminski K, Rudol G, et al. Clinical
value of a single serum CA-125 level in women with
symptoms of imminent abortion during the rst trimester of pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:982–8.
51. He K, Kallner A, Blombäck M, etal. Increased concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase in pregnancy
with preeclampsia: a predictor for the birth of smallfor- gestational-age infants. Gynecol Obstet Investig.
1995;39:234–8.
52. Niloff J, Knapp R, Schaetzl E, Reynolds C, Bast
RJ. CA125 antigen levels in obstetric and gynecologic patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(5):703–7.
53. Spitzer M, Kaushal N, Benjamin F. Maternal
CA-125 levels in pregnancy and the puerperium. J
Reprod Med. 1998;4(4):387–92.
54. Szecsi PB, Andersen MR, Bjørngaard B, Hedengran
KK, Stender S. Cancer antigen 125 after delivery
in women with a normal pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2014;93(12):1295–301.
55. Han A, Gziri MM, etal. Physiologic variations of
serum tumor markers in gynecological malignancies
during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Med.
2012;10:86.
56. Bourdel N, Huchon C, Abdel Wahab C, Azaïs H,
Bendifallah S, Bolze P, et al. Borderline ovarian tumors: guidelines from the French National
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
(CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2021;256:492–501.
57. Lerner IE, Federman A, Abramovich G, et al.
Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of
ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring
system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:81–5.
58. Wheeler AC, etal. Complex adnexal mass in pregnancy: predictive value of color Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:425–8.
59. Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al.
Carcinoma of the ovary. Int J Obstet Gynecol.
2003;1(1 Suppl):135–66.
60. Yoffe N, Bronshtein M, Brandes J, Blumenfeld
Z. Hemorrhagic ovarian cyst detection by transvaginal sonography: the great imitator. Gynecol
Endocrinol. 1991;5(2):123–9.
61. Baltarowich OH, Kurtz AB, Pasto ME, Rifkin MD,
Needleman L, Goldberg BB.The spectrum of sonographic ndings in hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. Am J
Roentgenol. 1987;148(5):901–5.
62. Jain KA. Sonographic spectrum of hemorrhagic
ovarian cysts. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(8):879–86.
63. Bree RL, Edwards M, Bohm-Velez M, Beyler S,
Roberts J, Mendelson EB. Transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of normal early pregnancy:
correlation with HCG level. Am J Roentgenol.
1989;153(1):75–9.
64. Barbieri E, Oneda S, et al. Decidualized ovarian
endometriosis in pregnancy: a challenging diagnostic entity. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1818–24.
65. Yuen AM, et al. Laparoscopic management of
adnexal mass during pregnancy. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:173–6.
66. Mascilini F, Moruzzi C, Giansiracusa C, Guastaerro
F, Savelli L, De Meis L, etal. Imaging in gynecological disease (10): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of decidualized endometriomas surgically
removed during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2014;44(3):354–60.
67. Ando T, Kato H, Kawaguchi M, Furui T, Morishige
K, Hyodo F, et al. MR ndings for differentiating
decidualized endometriomas from seromucinous
borderline tumors of the ovary. Abdom Radiol.
2020;45(6):1783–9.
68. Hill CE, Lee RA, et al. Ovarian surgery in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122:565–9.
69. Gustafson SH, Stout FE, etal. Ovarian tumors complicating pregnancy; a review of 45 surgically proved
cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;67:1210–23.
70. Hess LW, Peaceman A, O’Brien WF, Winkel CA,
Cruikshank DP, Morrison JC.Adnexal mass occurring with intrauterine pregnancy: report of fty-four
patients requiring laparotomy for denitive management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(5):1029–34.
71. Cohen-Herriou S, Lucot JP, et al. Management
of ovarian cysts during pregnancy: Lille’s experience and literature review. Gynecol Obstet Fertil.
2013;41:67–72.
72. Crispens MA.Borderline ovarian tumours: a review
of the recent literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol.
2003;15(1):39–43.
73. Timmerman P, Collins WP, et al. Subjective
assessment of adnexal masses with the use of
ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1999;13:11–6.
74. Taylor TK, Walker W, etal. Decidualisation of ovarian endometriomas in pregnancy: a management

202
https://t.me/medicina_free
8 Complex Ovarian Mass
dilemma. A case report and review of the literature.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:961–8.
75. Caspi A, Ben-Arie Z, Appelman Y, etal. Aspiration
of simple pelvic cysts during pregnancy. Gynecol
Obstet Investig. 2000;49(2):102–5.
76. Caspi Y, Lurie S, etal. Ultrasound-guided aspiration
for pain relief generated by simple ovarian cysts.
Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1993;35:121–2.
77. Koo YJ, Kim HJ, Lim KT, Lee IH, Lee KH, Shim
JU, et al. Laparotomy versus laparoscopy for the
treatment of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Aust
N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:34.
78. Montes De Oca MK, Dotters-Katz SK, Kuller JA,
Previs RA. Adnexal masses in pregnancy. Obstet
Gynecol Surv. 2021;76(7):437–50.
79. Upadhyay A, Stanten S, Kazantsev G, Horoupian R,
Stanten A.Laparoscopic management of a nonobstetric emergency in the third trimester of pregnancy.
Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2007;21(8):1344–8.
80. Mandi R, Bhar D, etal. Successful vaginal delivery
despite a huge ovarian mucinous cystadenoma complicating pregnancy: a case report. Iran J Med Sci.
2013;38:339–42.
81. Teng JY, Chang CK, etal. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing hemodynamically
stable patients with ruptured corpus luteum with
hemoperitoneum. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc.
2003;10:474–7.
82. Yamada T, Okamoto Y, Kasamatsu H, Mori
H. Intraoperative autologous blood transfusion for
hemoperitoneum resulting from ectopic pregnancy
or ovarian bleeding during laparoscopic surgery. J
Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2003;7(2):97–100.
83. Phupong V, Sueblinvong T, Triratanachat S.Ovarian
teratoma with diffused peritoneal reactions mimicking advanced ovarian malignancy. Arch Gynecol
Obstet. 2004;270(3):189–91.
84. Kocak B, Ozturk N, etal. Laparoscopic management
of ovarian dermoid cysts: a review of 47 cases. Ann
Saudi Med. 2004;24:357–60.
85. Clément D, Barranger E, Benchimol Y, Uzan
S. Chemical peritonitis: a rare complication of
an iatrogenic ovarian dermoid cyst rupture. Surg
Endosc. 2003;17:658.
86. Shamshirsaz AA, Shamshirsaz AA, Vibhakar JL,
Broadwell C, Van Voorhis BJ. Laparoscopic management of chemical peritonitis caused by dermoid cyst spillage. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg.
2011;15(3):403–5.
87. Ye P, Zhao N, Shu J, Shen H, Wang Y, Chen L,
etal. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal
masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review. Arch
Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299:625–34.
88. Eichelberger LA, Balthazar U, etal. Robotic resection of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Am J
Perinatol. 2013;30:371–5.
89. Scheib HH, Boruta DM, et al. Laparoendoscopic
single-site surgery for management of adnexal
masses in pregnancy: case series. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol. 2013;20:701–7.
90. Dursun C, Cağlar M, etal. Laparoendoscopic single-
site surgery for acute adnexal pathology during
pregnancy: preliminary experience. J Matern Fetal
Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1282–96.
91. Pearl R, Richardson W, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc.
2011;25:3479–92.
92. Nezhat C, Silfen SL, Fehnel SH, etal. Laparoscopic
ovarian cystectomy during pregnancy. J
Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:161–4.
93. Uccella S, Rosa M, Biletta E, Tinelli R, Zorzato PC,
Botto-Poala C, etal. The case of a serous borderline
ovarian tumor in a 15-year old pregnant adolescent:
sonographic characteristics and surgical management. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37(S2):S61–5.
94. Pittaway DE, Takacs P, Bauguess P. Laparoscopic
adnexectomy: a comparison with laparotomy. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:385–91.
95. Dede M, Yenen M, Yilmaz A, Goktolga U, Baser İ.
Treatment of incidental adnexal masses at cesarean
section: a retrospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
2007;17(2):339–41.
96. Ulker V, Gedikbasi A, Numanoglu C, Saygı S, Aslan
H, Gulkilik A.Incidental adnexal masses at cesarean section and review of the literature. J Obstet
Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(3):502–5.
97. Mathew SA, Jesrani SK, etal. Conservative management of twisted ischemic adnexa in early pregnancy.
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5:142–4.
98. Lynch F. Fibroids and ovarian cysts complicating
pregnancy. Cal West Med. 1931;35:415–20.
99. Usui R. A retrospective survey of clinical, pathological and prognostic features of adnexal masses
operated during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Res.
2008;26:89–93.
100. Lenglet H, Robishong B, etal. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cyst in pregnancy. Gynecol
Obstet Fertil. 2006;34:101–6.
101. Barrett C.Ovarian tumors complicating pregnancy,
delivery, and the puerperium. Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1913;16:28.
102. Balthazar U, Steiner AZ, Boggess JF, Gehrig
PA. Management of a persistent adnexal mass in
pregnancy: what is the ideal surgical approach? J
Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:720–5.
103. Soriano Y, Saidman D, et al. Laparoscopy versus
laparotomy in the management of adnexal masses in
pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:955–60.
104. Mendilcioglu CG, Trak B, etal. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. Safety and effectiveness. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:36–40.
105. Rizzo AG.Laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: longterm follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A.
2003;13(1):11–5.
106. Akira S, Yamanaka A, Ishihara T, Takeshita T, Araki
T. Gasless laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy during pregnancy: comparison with laparotomy. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(3 Pt 1):554–7.

Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy
https://t.me/medicina_free
9
Abstract
Ectopic pregnancy is one of the most common nonsurgical abdominal conditions during pregnancy. Unfortunately, most of these
presentations are during early pregnancy
when the conceptus is not developed for
independent life and is also not “viable.”
Preoperative and early diagnosis is common
due to the specic clinical presentation and
the routine use of βHCG for women of
reproductive age presenting with pain in the
lower abdomen. Both conservative and
operative interventions are available and
successful depending on the fetal status and
severity of bleeding. The biggest diagnostic
and therapeutic dilemmas arise in patients
with heterotopic or advanced abdominal
pregnancies. The clinician should always
look for intrauterine pregnancy preoperatively, even when ectopic pregnancy is conrmed. Advanced abdominal pregnancy
poses a real intraoperative problem due to
adherence of the placenta to surrounding
organs and tissues, and insisting on its complete removal can cause signicant and
sometimes unstoppable bleeding. Hepatic
and splenic pregnancies are prone to severe
bleeding due to the pronounced vascularity
of these organs.
9.1 Ectopic Pregnancy
inGeneral
If a woman with a child be bled, she will have an
abortion, and this will be more likely to happen the
larger the fetus
(Hippocrates, 400)
If one is confronted with a pelvic condition that follows no rules and conforms to no standards, he should
think of ectopic pregnancy and pelvic tuberculosis.
(Howard Atwood Kelly)
9.1.1 Incidence
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the implantation of a fertilized egg outside the uterine endometrium. The
rate of EP is constantly increasing. EPs quadrupled
from 17,800in 1970 to 88,000in 1989 [1]. This is
an increase from 4.5/1000 to 16.8/1000. In 1992,
the USA EP rate was estimated at 1.97% of all pregnancies [2] and was rising [3]. Further increase was
during 2006–2013in the USA [4]. The prevalence
of EP among women attending an emergency
department with rst-trimester bleeding, pain, or
both ranges from 6% to 16% [5]. An EP occurs with
seasonal variation and is most common in June and
December [6]. The reason is unclear, but the reproduction is seasonal, depends on photoperiod and
temperature, and varies with different latitudes.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
G. Augustin, Acute Abdomen During Pregnancy, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26021-6_9
203

204
https://t.me/medicina_free
9 Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy
9.1.2 Risk Factors
If the egg is too big, or if the diameter of the tuba
Fallopiana is too small, the egg stops and can get
no farther but shoots forth and takes root there.
(Pierre Dionis, 1718)
The overall risk is approximately 1/200 pregnancies, but may be increased 20- to 100-fold in
specic subsets of women [6]. Risk factors are
presented in Table9.1.
As many as 50% of Fallopian tubes removed
because of an EP show prior inammatory disease.
Table 9.1 Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy [3, 7]
Pelvic inammatory disease
Previous tubal (ectopic) pregnancy
Current intrauterine device use
Previous tubal surgery, including tubal sterilization
Previous infertility treatments
Endometriosis
Emergency contraception
Spontaneous
ectopic pregnancy
Post IVF-ET
ectopic pregnancy
Although the risk of pregnancy is very low with a
tubal ligation, if a pregnancy does occur, 10–50%
are EP, representing a 20- to 100-fold increased
risk [6]. Frequency is also higher with endometriosis, assisted reproductive technology (ART), and
emergency contraception [7]. The pathogenesis of
tubal pregnancy after natural and invitro fertilization (IVF) conception is presented in Fig.9.1.
9.1.3 Classication
9.1.3.1 Tubal Pregnancy
More than 95% of EPs implant the Fallopian tube.
Pregnancies can grow in the mbrial end (11%),
the ampulla (70%), the isthmus (12%), and the
cornual and interstitial part of the tube (2%) [9].
The tubal EP results from embryo retention within
the Fallopian tube due to impaired embryo-tubal
transport and alterations in the tubal environment
allowing early implantation [10].
Maternal age
Cigarette smoking
Previous ectopic pregnancy
Tubal factor infertility
Pelive inflammatory disease
Previous tubal surgery
Endometrisic
Risk factors
Tubal abnormality
Altered tubal
environment
Possible pathogenic
mechanism involved
Ectopic pregnancy
Infertility history
Uterine abnormality
Impaired tubal
transport
Impaired endometrial receptivity
Increased uterine contractility
Embryo retention and
implantation in
the fallopian tube
Infertility treatment
Transfer technique
Hydrostatic pressure
Transfer fluid medium
Uterine contractility
Controlled ovarian
hyperstimulation
Altered hormone milieu
Tubal abnorality
Retrograde transport
to fallopian tube
Uterine abnormality
Enhanced uterine
contractility
Embryonic factors
Impaired
endometrial receptivity
blastocyst & receptive
endometrium
Fig. 9.1 Potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of tubal pregnancy after natural and IVF conception
related to established risk factors. (Reproduced with permission from [8])

9.1 Ectopic Pregnancy inGeneral
https://t.me/medicina_free
205
9.1.3.2 Non-tubal Ectopic Pregnancy
Less than 5% of EPs occur in the ovary, cervix, or
intra-abdominally, and the locations slightly differ between normal conception and conception
after ART (Fig.9.2) [9].
9.1.3.3 Heterotopic Pregnancy
Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is the coexistence of
intrauterine and extrauterine gestation. The incidence of HP has been reported as 1/8000–
1/30,000 in natural conception [12]. However,
the rate is higher due to ART and is approximately 1/7000 overall and as high as 1/900 with
ovulation induction [13, 14]. The Fallopian tube
is the most common location with HP.However,
cervical and ovarian HPs have also been reported
[15, 16]. Most reported HPs are singleton intrauterine pregnancies. Triplet and quadruplet HPs
are extremely rare [17, 18], frequently after ART.
9.1.3.4 Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy
A persistent EP refers to the continuation of trophoblastic growth after a surgical intervention to
remove an EP. After a conservative procedure to
preserve the affected Fallopian tube, such as a sal-
pingotomy, some trophoblastic tissue, perhaps
deeply embedded, has escaped removal and continues to grow, generating a new rise in βHCG levels [19]. After weeks, this may lead to new clinical
symptoms, including bleeding. A less than 55%
decline at day 3 predicts persistent EP and may
select early cases for second-line methotrexate
(MTX) therapy [20]. βHCG dynamics in the week
before salpingotomy and bleeding activity at surgery may identify patients at risk of persistent EP
after laparoscopic linear salpingotomy [19].
9.1.4 Clinical Presentation
Textbooks from the rst half of the twentieth century claimed that the diagnosis of EP was based
on clinical criteria (gastric and mammary symptoms of pregnancy, cessation of the menstrual
cycle, palpation of a tumor near an enlarged
uterus, ballottement in the tumor, and purple discoloration of the vagina) and had 20% false preoperative diagnosis of a ruptured EP.In contrast,
diagnosing an unruptured EP was virtually
impossible [21].
Fig. 9.2 Sites and incidence of implantation in ectopic pregnancy following natural conception (left) and assisted
reproductive technology (right). (Modied from [11])

206
https://t.me/medicina_free
9 Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy
9.1.4.1 Medical History
The clinical features are complex and subject to
signicant variations in character and severity. A
quote from Howard A.Kelly seems timely that if
one is confronted with a pelvic condition that follows no rules and conforms to no standards, he
should think of ectopic pregnancy and pelvic
tuberculosis [22]. The explanation of these dif-
culties lies in the fact that the symptoms associated with extrauterine gestation arise not directly
from the presence of the growing ovum in the
Fallopian tube but from certain secondary lesions,
either traumatic or inammatory, which supervene. These secondary lesions may be briey
enumerated as follows [23]:
• intraperitoneal ooding from tubal abortion or
rupture,
• intratubal bleeding leading to acute distension
of the tube, the abdominal ostium being
sealed,
• slowly progressive or recurrent bleeding lead-
ing to the formation of encysted collections of
blood (pelvic hematoma, in the broad liga-
ment, pelvic hematocele, in the pouch of
Douglas, peritubal hematocele, around the
abdominal end of the tube),
• infection of the gravid tube or an encysted col-
lection of blood leading to suppuration.
Until these secondary lesions, extrauterine
pregnancy gives no more local or general disturbance than an early pregnancy in the uterus. An
important symptom associated with this phase, a
brief period of amenorrhea, is the most helpful in
diagnosis, but it is not always present. When a
healthy adult woman, who is usually regular,
goes for 2–3weeks over the expected date of her
period, there is a “strong presumption of pregnancy.” However, at this time, there is nothing to
indicate whether the pregnancy is uterine or
extrauterine. In the latter case, however, amenorrhea is of very brief duration, seldom more than
7–8weeks, and then gives place to hemorrhage.
In 30% of the cases, there is no amenorrhea at all.
As it is quite unusual for an extrauterine gestation
to continue undisturbed beyond the end of the
second month, there is consequently no time for
the appearance of other general pregnancy symptoms. However, occasionally, morning sickness
and early breast changes may be present.
When the course of the gestation becomes
interrupted by any of the occurrences mentioned
above, the clinical features undergo rapid transformation, and symptoms of extrauterine pregnancy appear—those that result from the
interruption of the pregnancy by injury to the
developing ovum or its containing sac. These
symptoms, regarded as secondary symptoms, are
highly variable in character and intensity in correspondence with the nature of the lesion which
has given rise to them. The most easily recognized is intraperitoneal ooding; the symptoms
that attend to it are uniform and characteristic.
With a clinical history of amenorrhea and a careful pelvic examination made, mistakes are rare.
Perforation of a hollow viscus, such as the stomach, duodenum, or gall bladder, is the only condition for which it is likely to be mistaken, even
under the circumstances unfavorable for diagnosis. Constant bleeding from the uterus is a secondary symptom of extrauterine gestation. If no
period of amenorrhea has occurred, it forms the
initial symptom, and if there has been amenorrhea, it succeeds it. Mostly, it is the earliest indication of anything wrong. However, as the same
thing frequently occurs from the disturbance of a
uterine pregnancy, little importance is usually
given to it. The bleeding is slight or moderate in
degree, sometimes continuous, sometimes irregular; it is usually dark, thick, and syrupy in
appearance. It may continue for several weeks if
the patient is not relieved by the operation. The
bleeding is due to separation and discharge of the
uterine decidua, sometimes complete, more often
in fragments. However, in most cases, the pieces
of membrane do not attract attention. The most
interesting phenomenon is this attempt on the
uterus to throw off its decidua when the tubal
ovum has been damaged. Some reex mechanism is initiated, which excites uterine contraction insufciently powerful to detach portions of
the membrane from the uterine wall and gives
rise to bleeding, which continues until the whole
decidua has been expelled. It is possible that at
the commencement, some blood that escapes

9.1 Ectopic Pregnancy inGeneral
https://t.me/medicina_free
207
from the uterus may have made its way there
from the gravid tube through the interstitial portion. In cases submitted to an operation, the hemorrhage always ceases a few days after removing
the tube. Retained portions of decidua give rise to
persistent bleeding.
The effects produced by the rapid effusion of
a large quantity of blood into the peritoneal cavity are, in the order of their occurrence, as follows
[23]:
1. acute abdominal pain,
2. fainting and the constitutional signs of
bleeding,
3. shock, attended by vomiting and lasting for
several hours.
No matter the nature of the secondary lesions
with tubal pregnancy, two symptoms are common—uterine bleeding and pain. The pain has
certain characteristics—sudden in onset, usually
spontaneous, although muscular effort, such as
lifting something heavy or the act of defecation,
may appear to excite it. It is always severe and
often most intense. First, it affects the whole
abdomen. Later it may become localized. It is
frequently attended with vomiting and signs of
shock, sometimes with faintness or actual syncope; after lasting acutely for several hours, it
subsides and may recur at varying intervals of a
few days or a week until several attacks have
been sustained; sometimes continuous pain without exacerbation follows the rst attack. The initial pain attack is almost always due to bleeding;
the subsequent attacks have a more complex origin. However, pain bearing the broad characteristics described above is a constant symptom of
extrauterine gestation. In cases not immediately
submitted to an operation, recurrent attacks of
intense pain may occur from repeated intraperitoneal hemorrhages. The classic signs of hemoperitoneum except abdominal pain include shoulder
pain caused by phrenic nerve irritation, an urge to
defecate, and syncope, even in the absence of
hypovolemia.
Rupture of ovarian pregnancy classically
occurs during the rst trimester and is preceded
by pain corresponding to distension of the ovar-
ian capsule. In developed countries, due to early
diagnosis, only 8–21% of ovarian pregnancies
are observed with hemodynamic shock [24].
For simultaneous intestinal obstruction with
ectopic pregnancy, see Sect. 18.12.2. Subjective
symptoms of pregnancy may also be present,
such as breast tenderness and emesis
gravidarum.
9.1.4.2 Physical Examination
Cullen’s sign (Fig. 9.3) is the bluish-black
appearance around the umbilicus, unassociated
with any history of injury, and a denite uterine
history usually typical of the slow tubal abortion
type of bleeding. Although Cullen rst described
the sign in 1918 and labeled it a new sign in ruptured extrauterine pregnancy [26], discoloration
of the umbilicus due to peritoneal extravasations
had been previously reported by Ransohoff in
1906. He described jaundice of the umbilicus in a
patient with a ruptured common bile duct. In
1909, Hofstatter observed a blue discoloration of
an umbilical hernia (Hofstatter’s sign) in a patient
with a ruptured tubal gestation. However, the discoloration in Hofstatter’s case was not due to
ecchymosis, but rather the transmission of the
Fig. 9.3 Cullen’s sign is a bluish-black appearance
around the umbilicus; extension does not depend on the
amount of bleeding but the duration of the primary process and other undetermined factors. (Reproduced with
permission from [25])

208
https://t.me/medicina_free
9 Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy
color of the blood through the thinned-out semitransparent hernia.
Meyers etal., by computed tomography, rst
noted that blood in the abdominal wall might be
responsible for these signs [27]. They dened
the anatomy of various retroperitoneal spaces
and compartments, revealing a direct extension
of hemorrhagic uid from the posterior pararenal space to the lateral edge of the quadrates
lumborum muscle, where a defect in the transversalis fascia permits access to the abdominal
wall musculature. The intramuscular hemorrhagic uid presumably reaches the subcutaneous tissues via interruptions in muscular
continuity. Cullen’s sign results from tracking
blood along the round ligament to the umbilicus. The portal of entry to the round ligament
complex from the retroperitoneum is via the
gastrohepatic ligament to the falciform ligament at the inferior-posterior liver edge [28].
The falciform ligament contributes to the connective tissue tube covering the round ligament
(obliterated left umbilical vein) as it passes to
the umbilicus.
The appearance of periumbilical ecchymosis
is a rare and late manifestation of intraperitoneal bleeding. In Cullen’s case, the discoloration began 1 week after the onset of pain.
Undoubtedly, prompt surgical treatment prevents the development of that sign in many
cases. It is possible that in some cases, the sign
appears after the operation without being
observed preoperatively. One also wonders how
many patients with tubal abortion, who undergo
spontaneous resolution without operation, may
develop the sign and never come under medical
observation. The presence or degree of discoloration is not related to the amount of bleeding but
rather to its duration and other undetermined
factors (Table9.2).
Adnexal masses are often not palpable [29,
30], and tachycardia is not always present.
Atypical ndings include paradoxical bradycardia [31], fever [32], and uterine enlargement suggestive of an IUP [32]. Rectal bleeding is a sign
of communication (inltration) between colorectum and EP (see Sect. 26.6).
Table 9.2 Conditions associated with non-iatrogenic
Cullen’s sign
Acute pancreatitis
Pancreatic trauma
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy
Ruptured aortic/iliac aneurysm
Ruptured spleen
Perirenal hematoma/bleeding
Ruptured common bile duct
Perforated duodenal ulcer
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatic lymphoma
Amebic liver abscess
Metastatic thyroid cancer
Rectus sheath hematoma
9.1.5 Dierential Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis of Cullen’s sign includes
several conditions. Periumbilical cellulitis typically causes blanching erythema that is warm to
the touch. Sister Mary Joseph’s sign (nodule)—a
metastatic spread of an intra-abdominal malignancy to the umbilicus—may present with thickening and erythema of periumbilical skin or as a
palpable mass lesion around the umbilicus [33].
Subcutaneous administration of heparin may
result in abdominal wall ecchymoses, which are
typically distant from the umbilicus. Patients
with psoriasis may develop periumbilical erythema with a silvery scale that bleeds on removal
(Auspitz’s sign). Umbilical endometriosis is
accompanied by bleeding in conjunction with the
menstrual cycle. Ulceration of a recanalized
umbilical vein in the setting of cirrhosis may
cause periumbilical skin darkening [34].
Signs of intra-abdominal bleeding without
Cullen’s sign have various nontraumatic causes.
9.1.6 Diagnosis
HP can have various presentations. Before symptoms, it is more likely: (1) with persistent or rising β-human chorionic gonadotropin (βHCG)
levels after dilatation and curettage for an
induced/spontaneous abortion, (2) when the uterine fundus is larger than for menstrual dates, and
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
