Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 220 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
86 Мб
Скачать
148
https://t.me/medicina_free
5 Fetal Trauma
114. Hoff WS, D’Amelio LF, Tinkoff GH, Lucke JF, Rhodes M, Diamond DL, etal. Maternal predictors of fetal demise in trauma during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172(3):175–80.
115. Ali J, Yeo A, Gana TJ, McLellan BA.Predictors of fetal mortality in pregnant trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;42(5):782–5.
116. Schiff MA, Holt VL. Pregnancy outcomes fol­lowing hospitalization for motor vehicle crashes in Washington state from 1989 to 2001. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(6):503–10.
117. Morris JA, Rosenbower TJ, Jurkovich GJ, Hoyt DB, Harviel JD, Knudson MM, et al. Infant sur­vival after cesarean section for trauma. Ann Surg. 1996;223(5):481–8; discussion 488–91.
118. Leggon R, Wood G, Indeck M.Pelvic fractures in pregnancy: factors inuencing maternal and fetal outcomes. J Trauma. 2002;53:796–804.
119. Kvarnstrand L, Milsom I, Lekander T, Druid H, Jacobsson B. Maternal fatalities, fetal and neona­tal deaths related to motor vehicle crashes during pregnancy: a national population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(9):946–52.
120. Al Mulhim AS, Balaha MH, Tudiver F.Predictors of fetal demise after trauma in pregnant Saudi Arabian women. East Mediterr Health J = La revue de sant?? de la M??diterran??e orientale = al-Majallah al­sihh??yah li-sharq al-mutawassit. 2012;18(5):432–8.
121. Reis PM, Sander CM, Pearlman MD.Abruptio pla­centae after auto accidents. A case-control study. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(1):6–10.
122. Poole GV, Martin JNJ, Perry KGJ, Griswold JA, Lambert CJ, Rhodes RS.Trauma in pregnancy: the role of interpersonal violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1873–8.
123. Srinarmwong C. Trauma during pregnancy: A review of 38 cases. Thai J Surg. 2007;24:138–42.
124. El-Kady WM, Anderson J, et al. Trauma during pregnancy: an analysis of maternal and fetal out­comes in a large population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1661–8.
125. Pearlman MD, Tintinallli JE, Lorenz RP. A prospective controlled study of outcome after trauma during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(6):1502–10.
126. Ali J, Yeo A, Gana TJ, McLellan BA.Predictors of fetal mortality in pregnant trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;42(5):782.
127. Pearlman MD, Tintinalli JE.Evaluation and treat­ment of the gravida and fetus following trauma during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1990;18(2):371–81.
128. Pearlman M. Management of trauma during preg­nancy. Female Patient. 1996;21:79–98.
129. Trivedi N, Ylagan M, Moore TR, Bansal V, Wolfson T, Fortlage D, et al. Predicting adverse outcomes following trauma in pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 2012;57(1–2):3–8.
130. Tanizaki S, Maeda S, Matano H, Sera M, Nagai H, Kawamura S, etal. Elevated maternal serum alpha-
fetoprotein after minor trauma during pregnancy may predict adverse fetal outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(3):510–3.
131. Golan O, Teare AJAS.Trauma in late pregnancy. A report of 15 cases. S Afr Med J. 1980;57:161–5.
132. Almog M, Tsafrir A, etal. Management of pelvic fractures during pregnancy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36:E153–9.
133. Lavin J, Polsky S.Abdominal trauma during preg­nancy. Clin Perinatol. 1983;10(2):423–38.
134. Akman CI, Cracco J.Intrauterine subdural hemor­rhage. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(12):843.
135. Sahin S, Sari FN, Dilmen U.In utero healing femur fracture in an otherwise healthy fetus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(4):1161.
136. Reichard. Diseases alle special hygielle of females. Philadelphia, PA: Lea; 1845.
137. Guadagnini A. Laceration of the anterior wall of the uterus and hernation of placenta. Rev Med Latino-Am. 1930;15:1029.
138. Catanese KCG.Fetal gunshot wound characteristics. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47:1067–9.
139. Stone CSIP.Interpretation of unusual wounds caused by rearms. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36:736–40.
140. di Maio VJM, editor. Gunshot wounds: practical aspects of rearms, ballistics and forensic tech­niques. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999.
141. Krey AN, Dayton DH, et al. Morphogenesis and malformations of the skin NICHD/ NIADDK research workshop. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;88:464–73.
142. Catanese CA, Gilmore K.Fetal gunshot wound char­acteristics. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(5):1067–9.
143. Lorenz HP, Lin RY, Longaker MT, Whitby DJ, Adzick NS, Martin P, et al. The fetal broblast: the effector cell of scarless fetal skin repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(6):1251.
144. Ferguson MWJ, O’Kane S. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanism to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:839–50.
145. Parua S, Kundu R, Paban M, Md N. Anaesthetic management of penetrating obstetric trauma at 36 weeks of gestation: whom to save mother or baby? IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;I(14):49–54.
146. Shehu BB, Ismail NJ, Hassan I, Mahmud MR, Lasseini A.Fetal head injury from intentional pen­etrating abdominal trauma in pregnancy. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2010;30:69–72.
147. Sakala EP, Kort DD.Management of stab wounds to the pregnant uterus: a case report and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1988;43:319–24.
148. Carugno A, Brito J, et al. Gunshot wound to the gravid uterus with non-lethal fetal injury. J Emerg Med. 2008;35:43–5.
149. Ward HRG, van Deurzen DFP, van Dongen PWJ.Gunshot uterine rupture: a case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;80:279–81.
150. Hashim I, Talat N.A rare fetal rearm injury. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017;27(Suppl 1):S36–7.
References
https://t.me/medicina_free
149
151. Geggie N. Gunshot wound of the pregnant uterus with survival of the fetus. CMAJ. 1961;84:489–91.
152. Gallo P, Mazza C, Sala F. Intrauterine head stab wound injury resulting in a growing skull fracture: a case report and literature review. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2010;26(3):377.
153. Edner G, Erasmie U, Gentz J, Lundell B, Schiller B.Intrauterine cranial gunshot wound in a 32-week fetus. J Trauma. 1988;28:1605–6.
154. Gündoğmuş ÜN, Akkaya H, Karbeyaz K, Keskin A.Residual pellet in fetal brain tissue following a gunshot injury to a pregnant woman: a case report. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(4):371–4.
155. Osnaya-Moreno TA, Escoto Gomez JA, et al. Gunshot wound to the pregnant uterus: case report. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35:427–31.
156. Oumarou O, Landry TW, Joe NC, Wirwah FT, Ulrich BS, Jean-Paul EN.Abdominal stab wound in A pregnant woman resulting in evisceration, uterine perforation and fetal chest injury: a case report and literature review. J Surg Surg Res. 2019;5:10–4.
157. Buchsbaum PAHC.Gunshot wound of the pregnant uterus. Case report of fetal injury, deglutition of mis­sile, and survival. Obstet Gynecol. 1969;33:673–6.
158. Muzumdar D, Higgins MJ, Ventureyra ECG. Intrauterine penetrating direct fetal head trauma following gunshot injury. A case report and review of the literature. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2006;22:398–402.
159. Beg MH, Ali WM, Samad A, Gauraw K, Alam S, Shaquib. Fetal gunshot of the chest: an unprec­edented surgical encounter. Int J Case Rep Imag. 2012;2:1–4.
160. Pasley JD, Demetriades D.Penetrating fetal trauma with late complications: a case report. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:E9–11.
161. Lende R, Erickson T. Growing skull fracture of childhood. J Neurosurg. 1960;18:479–89.
162. Vanderbeeken Y, Sarfati M, Bose R, Delespesse G. In utero immunization of the fetus to tetanus by maternal vaccination during pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1985;8(2):39–42.
163. Tetanus vaccines: WHO position paper – February
2017. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2017;92(6):53–76.
164. Gill TJ, Repetti CF, Metlay LA, Rabin BS, Taylor FH, Thompson DS, etal. Transplacental immuniza­tion of the human fetus to tetanus by immunization of the mother. J Clin Investig. 1983;72(3):987–96.
165. Committee Opinion No. 718: update on immuniza­tion and pregnancy: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):e153–7.
166. Kocamer B.Abdominal gunshot wound in pregnant woman: a case report. Perinatal J. 2014;22:110–3.
167. Degos V, Loron G, Mantz J, Gressens P.Neuroprotective strategies for the neonatal brain. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(6):1670.
168. Pham T, VanWoudenberg C, Chandrasekar I. Fetal gunshot brain injury leading to late post­natal hydrocephalus. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2018;11:427–31.
169. Bithoney WG. Elevated lead levels in children with nonorganic failure to thrive. Pediatrics. 1986;77:413–6.
170. Roux P, Pocock F. Blood lead concentration in children after gunshot injuries. S Afr Med J. 1988;73(10):580.
171. Montague A, Orozco B.Systemic lead poisoning in an infant after gunshot injury to the spine and brain. Clin Toxicol. 2017;55:790.
172. de Madureira PR, de Capitani EM, Vieira RJ, Sakuma AM, Toledo AS, Mello SM.Lead poisoning due to gunshot bullet in contact with cerebrospinal uid: case report. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009;127(1):52.
173. Wandaogo A, Tapsoba T, Ouédraogo I, Béré B, Ouédraogo SF, Bandré E.Penetrating chest wound of the foetus. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2016;13:155–7.
174. Molina GA, Aguayo WG, Cevallos JM, Gálvez PF, Calispa JF, Arroyo KA, etal. Prenatal gunshot wound, a rare cause of maternal and fetus trauma, a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;59:201–4.
175. Errando C. La paciente gestante con traumatismo grave. Consideraciones para el médico especialista en anestesiología y reanimación. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2005;52:336–48.
176. Sandy E, Koerner M.Self-inicted gunshot wound to the pregnant abdomen: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6(1):30–1.
177. Martins OMCG. Ferimentos do utero gravido por arma de fogo. All Bras Ginec. 1964;58:229.
178. Kobak CHAH. Gunshot wounds of the pregnant uterus: review of the literature and two case reports. Obstet Gynecol. 1954;4:383–91.
179. Wilson DPFS.Gunshot and war projectile wounds of the gravid uterus. Case report and review of litera­ture. J Natl Med Assoc. 1972;64:8–13.
180. Gallo P, Mazza C, Sala F. Intrauterine head stab wound injury resulting in a growing skull fracture: a case report and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(3):377–84.
181. Barinov SV, Pisklakov AV, Savelyeva IV, Pavlenko NI, Polyanskaya IB, Nosova NV.Obstetric bleeding due to penetrating stab-and-cut wounds to the uterus and fetus. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya (Russian Federation). 2019;2019(9):204–7.
182. Parua S, Kundu R, Nath MP. Anaesthetic manage­ment of penetrating obstetric trauma at 36 weeks of gestation: whom to save mother or baby? IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(11):49–54.
183. Awwad JT, Azar GB, Seoud MA, Mroueh AM, Karam KS.High-velocity penetrating wounds of the gravid uterus: review of 16 years of civil war. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(2):259–64.
184. Franger AL, Buchsbaum HJ, Peaceman AM.Abdominal gunshot wounds in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160(5 PART 1):1124–8.
185. Goff HBM.Gunshot wounds to the gravid uterus. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:436–8.
186. Sakala EP, Kort DD.Management of stab wounds to the pregnant uterus: a case report and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1988;43(6):319–24.
150
https://t.me/medicina_free
5 Fetal Trauma
187. Buchsbaum HJ. Diagnosis and management of abdominal gunshot wounds during pregnancy. J Trauma. 1975;15:425–30.
188. Browns R, Jonasson O, Vidyasagar DKB.Thoracoabdominal gunshot wound with sur­vival of a 36-week fetus. JAMA. 1977;237:2409–10.
189. Buchsbaum H. Diagnosis and management of abdominal gunshot wounds during pregnancy. J Trauma. 1975;15:425–30.
190. Katz VL, Droegmueller W, DDJ.Perimortem cesar­ean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(4):571–6.
191. Lopez-Zeno WA, O’Grady JP, etal. Infant survival following delayed postmortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:991–2.
192. Guneysel O, Yesil O, Ozturk TC, Cevik SE.Perimortem caesarean section following maternal gunshot wounds. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(8):1089.
193. Strong TJ. Perimortem cesarean section. Am J Emerg Med. 1989;7:489–94.
194. Weber C. Postmortem cesarean section: review of the literature and case reports. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110:158–65.
195. Behney C.Cesarean section delivery after death of the mother. JAMA. 1961;176:617–9.
196. Ritter J. Postmortem cesarean section. JAMA. 1961;175:715–6.
197. Molapo J.Postmortem cesarean section. S Afr Med J. 1972;46:98–9.
198. Katz V, Balderston K, Defreest M, Nageotte M, Parer J. Perimortem cesarean delivery: were our assumptions correct? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1916–21.
199. Og P. No title. Trans Am Assoc Obstet Gynecol. 1916;29:42.
200. Field DR, Gates EA, Creasy RK, Al E.Maternal brain death during pregnancy. JAMA. 1988;260:816–22.
Part II
https://t.me/medicina_free
Gynecology
Adnexal Torsion
https://t.me/medicina_free
6
Abstract
Adnexal torsion is one of the most common nonobstetric gynecologic, acute abdominal conditions in pregnancy. Due to the growing uterus, adnexa are pushed from the pelvic to an abdominal position making them more prone to torsion. With the widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies resulting in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, adnexal torsion is even more common. Due to the often nonspecic clinical presentation, differ­ential diagnosis is wide with some side­specic differential diagnoses. Sonography has high diagnostic sensitivity and specicity, and abdominal MRI is used in uncertain cases. Its use is increasing because it accurately dis­tinguishes acute appendicitis from adnexal torsion. The treatment is operative with increased use of nonresectional procedures. If malignancy is not suspected or proved, an additional reason for early operative detorsion is ovarian salvage in early pregnancy, which hormonal role is essential for the normal pro­gression of pregnancy.
6.1 Introduction
When a pregnant woman has violent diarrhea, there is a danger of her miscarrying in a pregnant woman if the breasts suddenly lose their fullness, she has a miscarriage.
If in a woman pregnant with twins, either of her breasts lose its fullness, she will part with one of her children; and if it is the right breast which becomes slender, it will be the male child, or if the left, the female. When women, in a moderate condition of the body, miscarry in the second or third month, without any obvious cause, their cotyledons are lled with mucosity, and cannot support the weight of the fetus, but are broken asunder. In women that are about to miscarry, the breasts become slender; but if again they become hard, there will be a pain, either in the breasts, or in the hip-joints, or the eyes, or in the knees, and they will not miscarry. Women with a child who are seized with fevers, and who are greatly emaciated, without any (other?) obvious cause, have difcult and dangerous labors, and if they miscarry, they are in danger.
(Hippocrates, 400BC).
Evaluation of a patient during pregnancy with acute abdominal pain should always include a search for surgical and gynecologic disorders. Parsons, in 1958, stated that 40% of women in the general population who present with symp­toms of pain in the lower abdomen and pelvis do not have the gynecologic disease [1].
Preservation of reproductive capability (child­bearing, hormonal function, and sexual health) impacts a woman’s wellness. This critical issue should be considered in the surgical management of acute gynecologic problems.
Adnexa is the anatomical area adjacent to the uterus and contains the fallopian tube, ovary, associated vessels, ligaments, and connective tis­sue. Adnexal torsion (AT) is a total or partial rota-
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Augustin, Acute Abdomen During Pregnancy, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26021-6_6
153
154
https://t.me/medicina_free
6 Adnexal Torsion
tion of the adnexa around its vascular pedicle resulting in ischemia.
6.2 Historical Perspective
Morgagni rst described AT in 1748 and Rokitansky in 1850. Kuestner, in 1891, rst described an ovarian torsion (OT) in a nonpreg­nant female [2]. Hartmann, in 1898, rst described AT in pregnancy [3], then Pinard in 1901 [4], Nicholson J. Eastman (President of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, (1961–62) in 1927 [5], Green­Armytage in 1929 [6], and Sheldon in 1936 [7]. In 1909, Gifford Nash published a case of iso­lated torsion of paraovarian cyst during early pregnancy [8], and Fleming, in 1920, published an ovarian cyst in the fth month of pregnancy [9], both without AT.Due to the adherence and the size of the ovarian cyst, Fleming resected the involved left Fallopian tube.
6.3 Incidence
The prevalence is probably underestimated pri­marily due to spontaneous detorsion [10, 11] or ovarian autoamputation without other symptoms or complications (Fig.6.1). Surgical treatment of AT constitutes 2.7% of all gynecological emer­gent surgeries during pregnancy [12]. The preva-
lence of AT is 1–5/10,000 spontaneous pregnancies [12, 13]. Isolated OT has reported an incidence of 1–10/10,000 spontaneous pregnan­cies [1416].
Torsion of hydatids of Morgagni involving the ipsilateral Fallopian tube causes acute abdominal pain in adolescents; AT constitutes approximately 25%. However, the condition is uncommon in adult females [18], representing a marginal part of ATs, rarely during pregnancy (see Chap. 7).
However, AT has been reported in 7–28% of all pregnancies complicated by adnexal masses [1924]. AT is an essential concern of pregnancy­associated adnexal masses and had a much higher incidence (13.8%) than malignancy (3.4%) [25]. The reported incidence of adnexal tumor torsion varies widely, ranging from 0.8% [26] to 53.8% of tumors undergoing antepartum surgery [27].
In an 80-year review, Jubb collected only 34 cases of ovarian cancer during pregnancy [28]. In 1973, Munnell emphasized the infrequent associ­ation between ovarian cancer and pregnancy at 1/18,000 pregnancies [29]. More recent compre­hensive reports summarized the incidence of
0.18–2.8/10,000 pregnancies [30, 31]. It is uncer­tain whether the incidence of ovarian cancer asso­ciated with pregnancy rises. However, since the childbearing age among older women increases, cancer incidence is also likely to rise during preg­nancy. In one study, 98% were elective cases with only one emergent operation for AT [32]. Bilateral torsion is infrequent, simultaneously or sequen­tially, with few cases reported [33, 34].
An incidence of AT with adnexal mass decreases as the gestational age increases [14, 33,
35]. In contrast, torsion of the normal adnexa
during pregnancy or the postpartum period is extremely rare, without known incidence.
Fig. 6.1 Macroscopic appearance of incidentally found autoamputated ovary in the cul-de-sac during Cesarean section for the lack of labor progress. (Reproduced with permission from [17])
6.4 Risk Factors
6.4.1 Adnexal Mass
Depending on the method and denition of a clinically signicant adnexal mass, the preva­lence of pregnancies complicated by an adnexal mass is 1–8% [3639]. Approximately 5% of
6.4 Risk Factors
https://t.me/medicina_free
155
these represent malignant tumors, making ovar­ian cancer the fth most common cancer diag­nosed during pregnancy (see Chap. 8) [40]. The incidence of simple or complex ovarian cysts in pregnancy is 5–8%, of which 0.7–3.8% undergo torsion [39, 41, 42]. Table 8.1 lists adnexal masses unique to pregnancy, while Table 8.2 shows the incidence of histopathologically con­rmed ovarian tumors during pregnancy. The most common tumor in pregnancy is benign cys­tic teratoma (22–40% of all ovarian tumors) [43]. Therefore, it is the most common tumor found with AT.Torsion occurs in 19% and ruptures in 17% of mature cystic teratomas in pregnancy
Table 6.1 Pathological ndings of ovarian torsion in pregnant women
Pathological nding Teratoma 30 Corpus luteum cyst 20 Follicular cyst 15 Serous cystadenoma 15 Endometrioma 10 Mucinous cystadenoma 5
Reproduced with permission from [68]
a
Two cases undergoing detorsion were without pathologi-
cal results
a
(%)
[44]. Complete torsion causes a venous and lym­phatic blockage, leading to stasis, venous con­gestion, hemorrhage, and necrosis. The cyst/ tumor becomes tense and may rupture. Whether the type of tumor has a predilection for isolated tumor torsion or AT in pregnancy is unknown.
Adnexal masses of 6–8cm have a higher
risk of adnexal torsion [25].
An explanation could be that a larger ovarian mass hardly goes into a torsion due to the mass effect. AT before the tenth week and after the 20th week of gestation had a tumor 6–8cm. However, tumors with larger diameters could undergo AT within the tenth and 17th week of gestation, likely because the adnexal tumor had been carried out of the pelvic cavity by the gravid uterus and had a larger surrounding environment. After the 20th week, the incidence of AT declines [25].
6.4.2 Anatomic Variations
ofAdnexa
Table 6.2 Differential diagnosis of right-sided and left-
sided adnexal torsion (side differences in italic)
Right-sided Left-sided Renal colic Renal colic Renal or urethral calculi/
obstruction Ectopic/heterotopic pregnancy Hemorrhagic/corpus luteum cysts Pyosalpinx/hydrosalpinx Pyosalpinx/hydrosalpinx Pelvic inammatory disease Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Nonpregnant horn of bicornuate uterus Bowel obstruction/ perforation
Periappendicular abscess/inltrate Meckel’s diverticulitis Ileocolic Crohn’s disease Ovarian vein thrombosis
Renal or urethral calculi/ obstruction Ectopic/heterotopic pregnancy Hemorrhagic/corpus luteum cysts
Pelvic inammatory disease Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Nonpregnant horn of bicornuate uterus Bowel obstruction/ perforation
Sigmoid diverticulitis/ abscess
The torsion of normal ovaries is due to hypermo­bile ovarian ligaments, long ovarian ligaments, or other inherent ovarian mobility. Other mecha­nisms include abrupt changes in intra-abdominal pressure with vomiting and coughing, adnexal venous congestion during pregnancy, and sudden acceleration/deceleration movements [4547]. The location changes of the adnexa and the uterus (i.e., the ovaries emerging from the pelvis by the increasing size of the uterus) may predispose the ovaries to twist by allowing them greater mobil­ity [48]. The main histopathologic ndings are follicular or corpus luteum cysts [49].
6.4.3 Assisted Reproductive
Technologies
The increased use of assisted reproductive tech­nologies (ART), such as controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, invitro fertilization (IVF), and
156
https://t.me/medicina_free
6 Adnexal Torsion
intracytoplasmic sperm injection, increase the risk of AT, particularly when ovarian hyperstimu­lation syndrome (OHSS) develops. The increased risk of AT with OHSS is due to the bilaterally enlarged ovaries with multiple follicular or lutein cysts in hyperstimulated patients, especially in those who become pregnant with persistent cysts. There is no side predilection [50]. Even bilateral AT was described [50, 51].
OHSS is the risk factor in 50% of twin pregnancies from ART [52].
The incidence of AT with OHSS in nonpreg­nant is 2.3% and 16% in pregnant women [26]. However, 12–25% of all AT occurs in pregnant women, often combined with ART and its com­plications. The incidence is low for oocyte dona­tion cycles (0–0.2%) and IVF cycles (0–0.13%). However, the incidence increases to 6% with stimulation for ART and to 16% with OHSS [13,
26, 42, 5357]. However, even when AT occurs
simultaneously with OHSS, the incidence varies between 1 and 33% [33]. Seventy percent of tor­sions occur in multiple pregnancies [53, 54, 58]. The incidence of fresh embryo transfer is 0.35% [59]. There are cases with OHSS treated success­fully, but patients developed AT in the more advanced pregnancy [53]. The proportion of patients with a twin pregnancy and ART in the <28 weeks group was signicantly higher than that in the 28weeks group [60].
6.4.4 Pregnancy andTrimester
Most ATs occur in the rst (by some 70% [62]) or second trimester of pregnancy, with 5.9– 10% in the third trimester [13, 25, 26, 45, 59,
6366]. Conception by ART is prone to rst tri-
mester AT [62]. The puerperal patient is more prone to AT because of the rapid anatomic changes in the pelvis, accompanied by the invo­lution of the uterus. At the same time, the utero­ovarian ligament remains disproportionately stretched, allowing the normal-sized ovary increased space to move and twist. This is most common during the rst postpartum week [47,
67], although it can occur after 3 weeks postpar-
tum [25]. Probably the women start to move, bend, and lift more. Sudden movement/rotation is a risk factor for AT.
The gravid uterus generally experiences
dextrorotation, and 80% of AT in preg-
nancy are right-sided [59, 62].
No signicant differences between <28weeks group and28weeks group in terms of the size of the adnexal mass, the cycles of AT, and the duration from onset to operation exist [61].
6.5 Pathology
It is important to dene the pathologic cause of AT.  Table 6.1 shows the pathology of adnexal masses causing torsion in pregnancy. If the mass is benign, there is no need for additional surgical or oncologic therapy.
Pregnancy is a risk factor for (recurrent) AT or isolated OT without ovarian mass, despite the method of conception and gestational age at the time of torsion. Recurrent torsion is more fre­quent in multicystic ovaries [14, 35]. The risk of OT rises by ve times during pregnancy [25], and prevalence decreases in late pregnancy [13], as well as isolated OT [14, 15]. Ectopic pregnancy can also be found on the contralateral side, pre­senting with AT [61].
6.6 Clinical Presentation
6.6.1 Medical History
The presenting complaint of AT is abdominal pain, in more than 80% of patients, abrupt in nature, very severe, in the right or left lower abdominal quadrant, with no relieving factors, including analgesics [52, 6971]. It is often described as sharp and “knifelike,” although it
6.8 Diagnosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
157
can be colicky and persists for 24h [26, 72, 73]. Abdominal pain is usually followed by nausea and vomiting [52]. The pain is proportional to the degree of circulatory obstruction; complete obstruction interrupting venous return results in sudden severe pain with nausea and vomiting developing rapidly. In addition to abdominal pain, ank pain is commonly present [54, 67], and the pain may radiate to the back or groin. There may be a history of waxing and waning pain if the adnexa has been twisting and untwist­ing or has undergone partial torsion, causing vas­cular slowdown but not thrombosis [26, 57, 74]. The infundibulopelvic ligament may twist and untwist by itself, reducing and increasing the pain. There may be a history of some jarring or movement that has caused the torsion, such as exercise before the onset of the pain or even just turning over in bed. Patients could have adnexal masses diagnosed before or even during preg­nancy. Commonly, there is no history of vaginal bleeding or discharge, diarrhea, constipation, fever, or urinary complaints [52, 71].
6.6.2 Physical Examination
Signs of peritoneal irritation, considered funda­mental for the diagnosis, are present in 43% of pregnant women and 19% of nonpregnant women [14, 33, 75]. Pelvic examination usually reveals a tender mass on the affected side. If the patient had normal adnexa before the torsion, she might not have a mass present until later in the torsion when edema and swelling of the adnexa have set in. Therefore, serial examinations may be neces­sary for a patient suspected of AT.The pain is usually lower with a twisted ovarian cyst than with acute appendicitis. It is more continuous and followed early by a mass that rapidly increases in size. Patients rarely have evidence of abdominal guarding or rebound tenderness on physical examination. Patients are mostly afebrile [52,
54]. A low-grade fever may occur [71], but sig-
nicant fevers point to another cause of pain. Tachycardia with normal blood pressure, pulse, and temperature indicate a noninammatory con­dition [76]. The extent of bleeding depends on
the degree and duration of torsion. Hemorrhagic infarction occurs later but never with a large amount of hemoperitoneum. Bimanual examina­tion denes mass felt through the fornix sepa­rately from the uterus. Tenderness is present, and mass is not moving with movements of the cer­vix. If not advanced pregnancy, the cervix is closed without signs of bleeding or discharge [71]. In advanced pregnancy, cervical dilation can be present. Uterine contraction or preterm labor, in addition to abdominal pain, is found in advanced pregnancy [52, 53].
6.7 Dierential Diagnosis
AT should always be a differential diagnosis of acute pelvic/abdominal pain in women, especially those with pelvic masses diagnosed by examina­tion or ultrasound (US). The differential diagnosis differs for right-sided and left-sided AT mostly due to surgical conditions (Table6.2) [70, 73, 77]. Gynecologic/Obstetric and urologic differential diagnoses are the same for both sides. The differ­ential diagnosis of AT is challenging in combina­tion with OHSS, as abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting are symptoms of hyperstimulation or pregnancy. The abdomen is already distended and tender because of the enlarged cystic ovaries [74]. Low-grade fever can accompany AT, but with high fever, inammatory conditions such as tubo­ovarian abscess, pyosalpinx, or pelvic inamma­tory disease (see Chap. 13) or non- obstetric inammatory conditions should be suspected.
6.8 Diagnosis
6.8.1 Laboratory Findings
Serum leukocyte levels are commonly normal [71], especially in the early phase. Leukocytosis may be present [54] but is not predictive, primar­ily because of common physiologic leucocytosis of pregnancy [33, 72, 73]. In the general female population, it is present in 56% [69]. Leukocytosis may change with OHSS.If necrosis and infection of the twisted organ occur, then higher fever and
158
ab
cd
https://t.me/medicina_free
6 Adnexal Torsion
higher (or progression of) leukocytosis may be present. βHCG should be routinely checked in suspected or proven cases of AT because preg­nancy is a risk factor for AT (see Sect. 6.4.4), especially if additional risk factors for ectopic pregnancy are present (see Chap. 9).
Hemoglobin/hematocrit is commonly normal [54, 71]. Physiologic anemia of pregnancy com­plicates the interpretation. With a AT lasting 12–24 h, a small decrease in values can be observed due to transudation of the blood-stained uid or (hemorrhagic) cyst rupture [46] or hem­orrhagic infarction. Urinalysis is normal [54].
6.8.2 Transvaginal Ultrasound
The transvaginal US often shows an enlargement of the ovaries and polycystic changes without this being evidence of torsion. It is extremely rare
for AT to occur with a mass <5 cm [59, 78]. Nonetheless, a large mass might sometimes be missed in the third-trimester presentations when a large uterus can hide the adnexa. The ovarian parenchyma is initially congested because of varying degrees of ovarian arterial, venous, and lymphatic occlusion with AT (Fig.6.2), and hem­orrhagic infarction occurs later [20, 79]. US nd­ings associated with the diagnosis of AT include a predominantly solid-appearing ovary, unilateral ovarian enlargement, peripheral cystic structures, and marked stromal edema and pelvic uid [57,
7983].
OHSS presents a signicant differential diag­nostic problem. Twisted adnexa is usually char­acterized by a solid-appearing ovary on US, organ enlargement, ovarian peripheral cystic structures, and marked stromal edema and pelvic uid. These characteristics are routinely present in a hyperstimulated ovary, and usually, both
Fig. 6.2 Different ultrasound images of twisted ovaries in pregnancy. (a) A transabdominal scan of an enlarged ovary with a 20mm simple unilocular cyst. The ovarian parenchyma appears edematous; (b) transabdominal scan of an enlarged 130×92mm ovary with multicystic com-
ponents; (c) transabdominal scan of an enlarged 65mm ovary without cystic components. The ovarian paren­chyma appears edematous; (d) laparoscopic view of tor­sion. Arrowheads point to the twisted ovarian pedicle. (Reproduced with permission from [48])