книги / 361
.pdf070 / |
76.005.2:60.561.7 |
. . |
|
« |
|
|
» |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
( |
|
« |
– |
») |
|
. |
|
|
, |
ё |
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
ё |
( |
« |
–»).
: ,
.
E.V. Kostrova
FSBEI HE “Murmansk Arctic State University”
Murmansk, Russia
CHARITY IN THE MEDIA
(ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE NEWSPAPER “KOMSOMOLSKAYA PRAVDA – MURMANSK”)
Abstract. The article deals with the specifics of problems of charity in Murmansk region, analyzes the current state and problems of charitable work in Murmansk region. The article examines the characteristics of publications devoted to charity (in the newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda – Murmansk”).
Key words: charity, problems of charity in mass media.
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
15 |
2014 . |
|
, |
, |
|
2012 . |
|
|
2013 . |
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
« |
|
– |
» |
2013 – |
|
2015. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
101
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
« |
|
– |
» |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
, |
– |
|
, |
– 38% |
|
31% |
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|||
11% |
; |
|
|
|
– 19% |
|
|
|
|
||
8% |
– 11% |
. |
|
|
|
|
« |
|
– |
||
|
|
|
|
||
» |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
: - |
, |
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
||
|
|
- |
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; |
- |
, |
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
||
, |
|
; |
- |
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
2014 |
. (15%), |
|
|
, |
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
- |
|
. |
|
(61% |
|
|
). |
|
|
|
|
||
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
102
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
(59%) |
, |
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
, |
|
- |
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
« |
, |
– |
». |
|
|
|
|
||
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
« |
|
– |
, |
» |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
« |
|
– |
|
|
|
|
||
» |
20 |
60 |
50 |
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
« |
|
– |
» |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|||
, |
« |
|
». |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
, |
, |
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
||
. |
|
|
|
|
|
103
070:77.044 / |
76.025.34 |
. .
«
»
. ,
( |
) |
.
,
( |
|
, |
|
). |
|
: |
, |
, |
.
T.G. Kupa
FSBEI HE “Murmansk Arctic State University”
Murmansk, Russia
PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF REPORTAGE
AS A GENRE OF PHOTOJOURNALISM IN THE MODERN MEDIA
(ON THE EXAMPLE OF MURMANSK)
Abstract. The article identifies the problems and prospects of development of the reportage as a genre of modern photojournalism on the example of Murmansk media and discussed the ways of solving the existing problems. Also, there is made an attempt to consider the modern genre of photo-report in the regional press as a phenomenon, and enter it into the system of mass communication and to identify the processes which are typical to modern photojournalism.
Key words: photo-report, photojournalism, trends in photojournalism.
.
- |
. |
« |
», |
, |
|
,
.
104
|
, |
|
|
( |
. |
), |
|
|
|
||
( |
, |
) |
|
. |
, |
, |
|
) |
( |
– |
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
, |
– |
, |
, |
|
. |
, |
, |
|
, |
|
, |
, |
, |
, |
|
2. |
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
. |
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
||
, |
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
. . |
, |
|
3.
, |
, |
,
,
,
.
, |
. |
1
2
3
|
. . |
- |
// |
. . |
. 2014. № 6. . 38–45. |
|
|
|
|
// |
. 2013. № 2–2. . 40–42. |
. |
: |
. ., 2013. 13. |
105
.
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
( |
2012 |
2015 |
.) |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
«Geometria |
» − |
|
|
|
||
«Geometria.ru», |
|
|
|
«Rascaschaem.ru», |
||||
|
«Qubist». |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
( |
2011 |
2015 |
.) |
|
: |
|
|
- |
.com», |
, |
|
|
|
«MurmanOut», « |
- |
|
|
||||
« |
|
», |
- |
« |
- |
». |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 . |
, |
|
, |
|
|
- |
|
|
467 |
|
. |
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
(67,24% |
|
|
|
|
|
), |
142 |
( |
|
30,47%), |
11 |
|
(2,36%). |
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
: |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
) |
|
, |
|
( |
|
, |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
: |
. |
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
- |
, |
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Zebra, Moloko). |
, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
2015 . |
|
. |
- |
|
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
, |
. |
||
|
( |
|
||
) |
|
, |
- |
|
|
|
|
||
|
, |
|
. |
|
3. |
. |
, |
|
|
|
( |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
||
, |
, |
|
, |
, |
). |
|
|
|
. |
», 2015 . |
|
|
«Geometria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
, |
|
. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
). |
( |
, |
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
« |
.com». |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
. |
, |
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
. |
, |
- |
« |
|
» |
« |
- », |
«B-port» |
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
||
, |
|
. |
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
, |
|
: |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
||
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
. |
, |
. |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
- |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
, |
. . |
[ |
] / . . |
// |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
. 2013. № 22. . 40–42. |
|
|
|
|
||
2. |
|
, |
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
6. . 38–45. |
[ |
] / . . |
// |
|
. 2014. № |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
, . |
|
: |
|
|
: |
. |
|
. [ |
] / . |
. .: |
, 2013. 192 . |
|
|
|
108
[070:654.197]:316.42 / |
76.005.2:60.52+76.03 |
. .
«
»
. ,
( |
« |
|
|
-21») |
|
. |
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
« -21» |
: |
|
. |
, |
. |
T.V. Kufenko
FSBEI HE “Murmansk Arctic State University”
Murmansk, Russia
ROLE OF TELEVISION MEDIA IN SOLVING SOCIAL PROBLEMS
(ON THE BASIS OF SOCIAL PROJECTS
OF THE TV COMPANY «TV-21»)
Abstract. The article defines the role of regional TV in forming public opinion in solving social problems of the region and identifies pressing social issues of the Murmansk region. Also we described the activities of TV Company “TV-21” in the process of attracting the audience’s attention to social problems.
Key words: social problems, social projects in mass media.
|
2014 ., |
|
|
: |
|
|
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
, |
|
. |
, |
|
. |
||
|
||
1. |
. |
|
20% |
ё |
|
2012–2013 . |
||
- |
109
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
(11,1% |
|
|
|
10,7% |
|
|
|
). |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
10%. |
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
2000 . |
1 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
||
|
|
870 |
, |
. |
2013 . |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
1,5 |
|
|
896 |
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
2013 |
. |
|
|
, |
- |
|
|
|
( |
|
2000 |
.) |
5,5 |
. |
|
2013 . |
|
|
- |
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
, |
|
46,1%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2015 . |
|
766,3 |
. |
|
1 |
2014 . |
4,8 |
. |
( |
0,6%). |
|
|
|
3. |
2000 |
2013 |
. |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
2013 . |
|
12,9% |
1 |
000 |
|
, |
|
2,2 |
|
|
2009 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
.
. |
, |
|
|
, |
, |
|
. |
: |
, |
|
, |
|
110 |