Павлинов И.Я. Номенклатура в систематике. История, теория, практика

Brown R. 1810. Prodromus florae Novae Hollandi et Insula Van-Diemen, exhibens characteres plantarum... Vol. 1. Londini: J. Johnson. 590 p.

Brown R.W. 1954. Composition of scientific words:Amanual of methods and a lexicon of materials for the practice of logotechnics. Baltimore (MD): Publ. by the author. 892 p.

Bull M.J., Marchesi J.R., Vandamme P. et al. 2012. Minimum taxonomic criteriaforbacterialgenomesequencedepositionsandannouncements.

— Journal of Microbiological Methods, 89 (1): 18–21.

BungeM.1977.Treatiseonbasicphilosophy.V.4.OntologyI,thefurniture of the World. Dordrecht: D. Riedel Publ. 352 p.

BurlingL.D.1912:Thenomenclatureoftypes.—JournaloftheWashington Academy of Sciences, 2 (20): 519–520.

Cain A.J. 1958. Logic and memory in Linnaeus’ system of taxonomy. — Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 169 (1–2): 144–163.

CainA.J.1959.Thepost-Linnaeandevelopmentoftaxonomy.—Proceed- ings of the Linnean Society of London, 170 (3): 234–244.

Camp W.H. 1951. Biosystematy. — Brittonia, 7 (1): 113–127.

CampW.H.,GillyC.L.1943.Thestructureandoriginofspecies,withadiscussionofintraspecificvariabilityandrelatednomenclaturalproblems.

— Brittonia, 4 (3): 323–385.

Candolle A., de. 1867. Lois de la nomenclature botanique adoptées par le Congrès international de botanique tenu à Paris en août 1867... Paris: J.B. Baillere et fils. 64 p.

CandolleA., de. 1868. Laws of botanical nomenclature adopted by the InternationalBotanicalCongressheldatParisinAugust,1867…London: L. Reeve & Co. 72 p.

CandolleA., de. 1880. La phytographie, l’art de décrire les végétaux considérés sous différents points de vue. Paris: G. Masson. 484 p.

CandolleA.,de.1883.Nouvelleremarquessurlanomenclaturebotanique. Supplementaucommentairedumemeauteurquiaccompagnaitletexte des lois. Geneve: H. Georg. 79 p.

Candolle A., de, Cogniaux C.A. 1876. Quelques points de nomenclature botanique. — Bulletin de la Société Royale de Botanique de Belgique, 15: 477–485.

CandolleA.-P., de. 1813. Théorie élémentaire de la Botanique, oe exposition des principes de la classification naturelle… Paris: Deterville. 500 p. [+ Index]

CandolleA.-P.,de.1818.Regnivegetabilissystemanaturale,siveOrdines, genera et species plantarum… Parisiis: Treuttel et Wurtz. 564 p.

CandolleA.-P.,de.1819.ThéorieélémentairedelaBotanique,oeexposition des principes de la classification naturelle… Ed. 2. Paris: Deterville. 566 p. [+ Index]

Cantino P.D., Bryant H.N., Queiroz K., de, et al. 1999. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. — Systematic Biology, 48 (4): 790–807.

Cantino P.D., Queiroz K., de. 2010. International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature. Version 4c. — http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/.

Carus J.V., Döderlein L., Möbius K. 1894. Berathung des zweiten Entwurfes von Regeln für die zoologische Nomenclatur im Auftrage der deutschen zoologischen Gesellschaft. —Verhandlungen der deutschen zoologischen Gesellschaft auf der dritten Jahresversammlung zu Göttingen, den 24 bis 26 mai 1893: 84–88.

CesalpinoA. 1583. De plantis libri XVIAndreae CesalpiniAretini… Florentiae: Georgium Marescottum. 621 p. [+ Index]

Chakrabarty P. 2010. Genetypes: a concept to help integrate molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy. — Zootaxa, 2632: 67–68.

Chaper M. 1881. Rapport fait au nom de la Comission de nomenclature de la Société Zoologique de France. — Nomenclature des êtres organisés. Paris: au Siège de la Société. P. 7–37.

Chapitre V. 1858. Lois de la Nomenclature. — Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Normandie, 3: 91–94.

Clements F.E. 1902. Greek and Latin in biological nomenclature. — University Studies (Univ. Nebraska), 3 (1): 1–85.

ClerckC.1757.SvenskaSpindlarutisinahufvudslågterindeltesamtunder några… / Aranei Svecici, descriptionibus et figuris æneis illustrate...

Stockholmiae: Laurentius Salvius. 154 р. [+ plts]

Code of botanical nomenclature / Code de la nomenclature botanique / Kodex der botanische Nomenclatur. 1904. — Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 31 (5): 249–290.

Colless D.H. 1967. An examination of certain concepts in phenetic taxonomy. — Systematic Zoology, 16 (1): 6–27.

Cook L.G., Edwards R.D., Crisp M.D., Hardy N.B. 2010. Need morphology always be required for new species descriptions? — Invertebrate Systematics, 24 (3): 322–326.

Cook O.F. 1898. The method of types. — Science, New Series, 8 (198): 513–516.

Cook O.F. 1900. The method of types in botanical nomenclature. — Science, New Series, 12 (300): 475-481.

CookO.F.1901.Priorityofplaceandthemethodoftypes.—Science,New Series, 13 (331): 712–713.

Cope E.D. 1878.The report of the committee of theAmericanAssociation of 1876 on biological nomenclature. — The American Naturalist, 12 (8): 517–525.

Coquillett D.W. 1907. The first reviser and elimination. — Science, New Series, 25 (642): 625–626.

Corliss J.O. 1995.The ambiregnal protists and the Codes of nomenclature: Abrief review of the problem and of proposed solutions. — Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 52 (1): 11–17.

Coues E., Allen J.A., Ridgway R. et al. 1886. The Code of nomenclature and check-list of NorthAmerican birds adopted by theAmerican Ornithologists’Union…NewYork:AmericanOrnithologists’Union.392p.

Cronquist A. 1991. Do we know what we are doing? — Hawkswart D.L. (ed.). Improving of stability of names: Needs and options (Regnum Vegetabile, 123). Königstein: Koetz Sci. Books. P. 301–311.

Cuvier G. 1817. Le règne animal distribué d’après son organization… T. 1. Paris: Deterville. 540 p.

Dall W.H. 1877. Nomenclature in zoology and botany. A report to the AmericanAssociationfortheAdvancementofScienceattheNashville meeting,August 31, 1877. Salem (MA): Salem Press. 56 p.

DanaJ.D.1846.Reportofscientificnomenclature,AssociationofAmerican Geologists and Naturalists… New Haven: B.L. Hamlen. 7 p.

Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection… London: John Murray. 502 p.

Davis P.H., Heywood V.H. 1963. Principles of Angiosperm taxonomy. London: Oliver & Boyd. 556 р.

Dayrat B. 2010. Celebrating 250 dynamic years of nomenclatural debates.

— PolaszekA. (ed.). Systema Naturae 250 —The LinnaeanArk. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. P. 186–239.

Dayrat B., Cantino P.D., Clarke J.A., Queiroz K., de. 2008. Species names inthePhyloCode:TheapproachadoptedbytheInternationalSocietyfor Phylogenetic Nomenclature. — Systematic Biology, 57 (3): 507–514.

DayratB.,SchanderC.,AngielczykK.2004.Suggestionsforanewspecies nomenclature. — Taxon, 53, (2): 485–491.

De SmetW. 1991a. La sistemo N.B.N. (Nova Biologia Nomenklaturo). — Kalmthout:AsocioporlaEnkondukodeNovaBiologiaNomenklaturo. 94 p.

De Smet W.M.A. 1991b. Meeting user needs by an alternative nomenclature. — Hawksworth D.L. (ed.). Improvement the stability of names: Needs and options. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. P. 179–181.

DeCandolleA.P., Sprengel K. 1821. Elements of the philosophy of plants, containingtheprinciplesofscientificbotany…Edinburgh:Blackwood; London: T. Cadell. 486 p.

DouvilléH.1882.Règlesàsuivrepourètablirlanomenclaturedesespèces.

— Congrès Géologique Internatl., compte rendu de la 2-me session, Bologne, 1881. Bologne: Fava et Garaniani. P. 592–595.

Downing A.J. 1839. The fruits and fruit trees of America… New York: John Wiley. 760 p.

Du Rietz G.E. 1930. The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. — Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 24 (3): 333–428.

DuboisA.2000.Synonymiesandrelatedlistsinzoology:Generalproposals, with examples in herpetology. — Dumerilia, 4 (2): 33–98.

DuboisA. 2005. Proposed rules for the incorporation of nomina of higherrankedzoologicaltaxaintheInternationalCodeofZoologicalNomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. — Zoosystema, 27 (3): 365–426.

Dubois A. 2006. New proposals for naming lower-ranked taxa within the frameoftheInternationalCodeofZoologicalNomenclature.—Comptes Rendus Biologies, 329 (10): 823–840.

Dubois A. 2008a. Zoological nomenclature: some urgent needs and prob- lems.—Symposium“FuturetrendsofTaxonomy”(Carvoeiro,January 21st–23rd, 2008). EDIT: 15–18.

Dubois A. 2008b. A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. — Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93 (4): 857–863.

Dubois A. 2008с. Phylogenetic hypotheses, taxa and nomina in zoology.

— Zootaxa, 1950: 51–86.

Dubois A. 2010. Retroactive changes should be introduced in the Code only with great care: problems related to the spellings of nomina. — Zootaxa, 2426: 1–42.

DuboisA.2011a.TheInternationalCodeofZoologicalNomenclaturemust be drastically improved before it is too late. — Bionomina, 2: 1–104.

DuboisA.2011b.Therichbutconfusingterminologyofbiologicalnomenclature: A first step towards a comprehensive glossary. — Bionomina, 3: 1–23.

Dubois A. 2012. The distinction between introduction of a new nomen and subsequent use of a previously introduced nomen in zoological nomenclature. — Bionomina, 5: 57–80.

Dubois A. 2013. Zygoidy, a new nomenclatural concept. — Bionomina, 6: 1–26.

DupréJ.1981.Naturalkindsandbiologicaltaxa.—PhilosophicalReview, 90 (1): 66–90.

Durand E.J. 1909. A discussion of some of the principles governing the interpretation of pre-Persoonian names, and their bearing on the selec- tionofastarting-pointformycologicalnomenclature.—Science,New Series, 29 (747): 670–676.

EarleF.S.1904.ThenecessityforreforminthenomenclatureoftheFungi.

— Science, New Series, 19 (482): 508–510.

Editorial. 2012.Amendment ofArticles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. — Zootaxa, 3450: 1–7.

Ehrlich P.R. 1961. Systematics in 1970: some unpopular predictions. — Systematic Zoology, 10 (1): 157–158.

Eldredge N., Cracraft J. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 349 p.

Ellen R.F. 1993. The cultural relations of classification. An analysis of NuauluanimalcategoriesfromCentralSeram.Cambridge(UK):Cambridge Univ. Press. 322 p.

Ellen R.F. 2008. The categorical impulse: Essays on the anthropology of classifying behavior. Oxford (UK): Berghahn Books. 248 p.

Ellerman J.R., Morrison-Scot T.C.S. 1951. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indianmammals:1758to1946.London:TrustesoftheBritishMuseum (Natural History). 810 p.

Endersby J. 2008. Imperial nature, Joseph Hooker and the practice of Victorian science. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. 429 p.

Engler A., Urban I., Garcke A. et al. 1897. Nomenclaturregeln für die Beamten des Königlichen Botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin. — Notizblatt des Königlichen botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin, 1 (8): 245–250.

Ereshefsky M. 1997. The evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy. — Biology and Philosophy, 12 (4): 493–519.

Ereshefsky M. 2001. The poverty of the Linneaean hierarchy: A philosophical study of biological taxonomy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. 316 p.

EreshefskyM.2007.Foundationalissuesconcerningtaxaandtaxonnames.

— Systematic Biology, 56 (2): 295–301.

Erikssont M., Jeppsson L., Bergman C.F. et al. 2000. Paranomenclature and the rules of Zoological Nomenclature, with examples from fossil polychaetejaws(scolecodonts).—Micropaleolntology,46(2):186–188.

Evans K.M., Mann D.G. 2009. A proposed protocol for nomenclaturally effective DNAbarcoding of microalgae. — Phycologia, 48 (1): 70–74.

EvenhuisN.L.2008a.The“Mihiitch”—abriefhistory.—Zootaxa,1890: 59–68.

Evenhuis N.L. 2008b. A compendium of zoological type nomenclature: Areference source. — Bishop Museum Technical Report, 41: 1–23.

Fabricius I.C. 1778. Philosophia entomologica sistens Scientiae fundamenta… Hamburgi et Kilonii: Carol. Ernest. Bonnii. 178 p.

Fabricius I.C. 1801. Systema Eleutheratorum secundum ordines, genera, species... T. 1. Kiliae: Bibliopol.Acad. Novi. 687 p.

Farber R.L. 1976. The type concept in zoology in the first half of the nineteenth century. —The Journal of the History of Biology, 9 (1): 93–119.

Federhen S. 2014. Type material in the NCBI Taxonomy Database. — NucleicAcids Research, D1: D1086–D1098.

Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland (MA): SinauerAssoc. 664 p.

FeltE.P.1934.Classifyingsymbolsforinsects.—JournaloftheNewYork Entomological Society, 42 (4): 373–392.

FeltE.P.CockerellT.D.A.,TroxellE.L.1930.Scientificnames.—Science, New Series, 71 (1834): 215–218.

Fischer M. 1889. Rules of nomenclature adopted by the International Zoological Congress held in Paris, France, 1889. — The American Naturalist, 26 (305): 383–388.

FisherW.K.1905.AnewCodeofNomenclature.—TheCondor,7(1):28–30. FlesnessN.R.2003.InternationalSpeciesInformationSystem(ISIS):over 25 years of compiling global animal data to facilitate collection and populationmanagement.—InternationalZooYearbook,38(1):53–61. Friedmann E.I., Borowitzka L.J. 1982.The symposium on taxonomic con- ceptsinblue-greenalgae:towardsacompromisewiththeBacteriological

Code? — Taxon, 31 (3): 673–683.

Fries E. 1821–1829 [1832]. Systema micologicum: sistens fungorum or- dines,generaetspecies…V.1–3.Lundae:Berlingiana;Gryphiswaldae: Mauritii. 520, 620, 202 pp.

FrizzellD.L.1933.Terminologyoftypes.—AmericanMidlandNaturalist, 14 (6): 637–668.

FuchsL.1542.Dehistoriastirpiumcommentariiinsignesmaximisimpensis et vigiliis elaborati… Basileae [Basel]: Isingriniana. 896 p.

Gadow H. 1893. Vögel. T. II. Systematische Teil. — Bronn H.G. (hrsg.). KlassenundOrdnungendesTheir-Velt.Amsterdam:T.J.VanHolkema.

GarrityG.M.,LyonsC.2003.Future-proofingbiologicalnomenclature.—A Journal of Integrative Biology, 7 (1): 31–33.

GentryA.,Clutton-BrockJ.,GrovesC.P.2004.Thenamingofwildanimal species and their domestic derivatives. — Journal of Archaeological Science, 31 (5): 645–651.

Ghiselin M.T. 1995. Ostensive definitions of the names of species and clades. — Biology and Philosophy, 10 (2): 219–222.

GhiselinM.T.1974.Aradicalsolutiontothespeciesproblem.—Systematic Zoology, 23 (4): 536–544.

Gill T. 1896. Some questions of nomenclature. — Science, New Series, 4 (95): 581–601.

Gilmour J.S.L. 1940. Taxonomy and philosophy. — Huxley J. (ed.). The New Systematics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. P.461–474.

Gmelin J.F. 1792. The Animal kingdom, or Zoological system of the celebrated Sir Charles Linnaeus. Class I. Mammalia… Edinburgh: A. Strahan, T. Cadell, & W. Creech. 644 p.

Gray A. 1864. Nomenclature. — The American Journal of Science and Arts, 37 (3): 278–281.

GrayA. 1879. Structural botany, or organography on the basis of morphology, to which is added the principles of taxonomy and phytography, and a glossary of botanical terms. 6th ed. NewYork: Blakeman,Taylor & Co. 442 p.

Gray S.F. 1821. Natural arrangement of British plants, according to their relationstoeachother,aspointedoutbyJussieu,DeCandolle,Brown… V. 1. London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy. 824 p.

Green M.L. 1927. History of plant nomenclature. — Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens, Kew), 10: 403–415.

GreeneE.L.1891.Dr.Kuntzeandhisreviewers.—Pittonia,2(11):263–281. Greene E.L. 1896. Some fundamentals of nomenclature. — Science, New

Series, 3 (53): 13–16.

GreeneE.L.1909.Landmarksofbotanicalhistory.Astudyofcertainepochs in the development of the science of botany. Pt 1 — Prior to 1562. — Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 54 (1870). 329 p.

Gregg J.R. 1954. The language of taxonomy. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 71 p.

Greuter W., Garrity G., Hawksworth D.L. et al. 2011. Draft BioCode: principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. — Taxon, 60 (1): 201–212.

Greuter W., Hawksworth D.L., McNeill J. et al. 1996. Draft BioCode: The prospectiveinternationalrulesforthescientificnamesoforganisms.— Taxon, 45 (2): 349–372.

GriffithsG.C.D.1976.ThefutureofLinneannomenclature.—Systematic Zoology, 25 (2): 168–173.

GualtieriN.1742.Indextestarumconchyliorumquaeadservanturinmuseo Nicolai Gualtieri ... Florentinae:Albizzini. Tabs I–CX.

Guérin-Méneville F.E. 1843. Rapport d’une commission nommée par l’Association britannique pour l’avancement de la science, chargée d’examiner les règles d’après lesquelles la nomenclature zoologique pourraitêtresétabliesurunebaseuniformeetpermanente(in-8.Londres, 27 juin 1842). — Revue Zoologique (1843): 202–210.

Haeckel E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine GrundzügederorganischenFormen-Wissenschaft,mechanischbegrün- det durch die von Charles Darwin reformierte Descendenztheorie. Bd 1. Allgemeine Anatomie der Organismen. Bd 2. Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen. Berlin: Reimer. 576 S.

Hammen L., van der. 1981. Type concept, classification and evolution. — Acta Biotheoretica, 30 (1): 3–48.

HärlinM.2005.Definitionsandphylogeneticnomenclature.—Proceedings of the CalifornianAcademy of Sciences, 56, Suppl. I (19): 216–224.

HärlinM.,SundbergP.1998.Taxonomyandphilosophyofnames.—Biol- ogy and Philosophy, 13 (2): 233–244.

HartingP.1871.SkizzeeinesrationellenSystemsderzoologischesNomenclature. —Archive für Naturgeschichte, 1: 25–41.

Hawksworth D.L. 2010. Terms used in Bionomenclature. The naming of organisms (and plant communities), including terms used in botanical

...zoologicalnomenclature.Copenhagen:GlobalBiodiversityInformation Facility. 215 р.

Hawksworth D.L., Crous P.W., Redhead S.A. et al. 2011. TheAmsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature. — IMAFungus, 2 (1): 105–112.

HawksworthD.L.,McNeillJ.,SneathP.H.A.etal.1994.Towardsaharmonized bionomenclature for life on Earth. — Report of the IUBS/IUMS ExploratoryMeetingonharmonizationbetweencodesofnomenclature

held on 16–18 March 1994 at the International Mycological Institute, Egham, Surrey, UK. Biology International. Special Issue, 30. 44 p.

HedwigJ.1801.Speciesmuscorumfrondosorum…Lipsiae(Leipzig):J.A. Barthi. 352 p. [+ tbls]

Heise H., Starr M.P. 1968. Nomenifers: Are they christened or classified?

— Systematic Zoology, 17 (4): 458–467.

Heller J.L. 1964. The early history of binomial nomenclature. — Huntia, 1: 33–70.

HennigW.1950.GrundzugeeinigerTheoriederphylogenetischeSystematik. Berlin: Deutscher Zentralverlag. 370 S.

Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana (IL): Univ. Illinois Press. 263 p.

Hennig W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Frankfurt: Verlag Waldemar Kramer. 436 S.

Heppel D. 1981. The evolution of the Code of Zoological Nomenclature.

— Wheeler A., Price J.H. (eds). History in the service of systematics. Papers from the Conference to celebrate the Centenary of the British Museum(NaturalHistory),13–16April,1981.London:Societyforthe Bibliography of Natural History. P. 135–141.

Herrera A.L. 1899. About a reform in nomenclature. — Science, New Series, 10 (239): 120–121.

HitchcockA.S. 1905. Nomenclatorial type specimens of plant species. — Science, New Series, 21 (543): 828–832.

HitchcockA.S. 1922. [Type-basis code]. — The Journal of Botany British and Foreign, 60 (719): 316–318.

Ho M.W. 1992. Development, rational taxonomy and systematics. — Biological Forum, 85 (2): 193–211.

Hooker W.J. 1875. The flora of British India. V. 1. London: L. Reeve & Co. 740 p.

Hull D.L. 1966. Phylogenetic numericlature. — Systematic Zoology, 15 (1): 14–17.

Hull D.L. 1968. The syntax of numericlature. — Systematic Zoology, 17 (4): 472–474.

HullD.L.1970.Contemporarysystematicphilosophies.—AnnualReview of Ecology and Systematics, 1: 19–54.

Hull D.L. 1977. The ontological status of species as evolutionary unit. — ButtsR.,HintikkaJ.(eds).Foundationalproblemsinthespecialsciences. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. P.91–102.

InternationalCodeofNomenclatureforalgae,fungi,andplants(Melbourne Code)adoptedbytheEighteenthInternationalBotanicalCongressMel- bourne,Australia,July2011.2012.—RegnumVegetabile,154.Koeltz Sci. Books. http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php.

International Code of Zoological Nomenclature / Code international de nomenclature zoologique. Ed. 1. 1961. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.176 p.

InternationalCodeofZoologicalNomenclature.FourthEdition/Codeinternationale de nomenclature zoologique. Quatrème Edition /Adopted by theInternationalUnionofBiologicalSciences.1999.London:Internat. Trust for Zool. Nomencl. 306 p.

InternationalCommitteeonBionomenclature.2001.—BulletinofZoologi- cal Nomenclature, 58 (1): 6–7.

Jahn T.L. 1961. Man versus machine: a future problem in protozoan taxonomy. — Systematic Zoology, 10 (1): 179–192.

JanickJ.2003.Herbals:Theconnectionbetweenhorticultureandmedicine.

— HortThechnology, 13 (2): 229–238.

JardineW.1866.ReportofaCommitteeappointedtoreportonthechanges which they may consider desirable to make… — Report of the thirtyfifthmeetingoftheBritishAssociationfortheAdvancementofScience (1865). London: John Murray. P. 25–42.

Jordan D.S. 1900.The first species named as the type of the genus. — Science, New Series, 12 (308): 785–787.

Jordan D.S. 1905. The method of elimination in fixing generic types in zoological nomenclature. — Science, New Series, 22 (567): 598–601.

Jordan D.S. 1907. The “first species” and the “first reviser”. — Science, New Series, 25 (638): 467–469.

Jordan D.S. 1911. The use of numerals for specific names in systematic zoology. — Science, New Series, 33 (845): 370–373.

Jörger K.M., Schrödl M. 2013. How to describe a cryptic species? Practical challenges of molecular taxonomy. — Frontiers in Zoology, 10: 59.

JungJ.1747.Opusculabotanico-physica…Coburgi:GeorgiiOttonis.183p. Jussieu A.L. 1773. Examen de la famille des renoncules. — Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Siences. Année I773. Avec les Mémoires de Mathématique & de Physique, pour la mêmeAnnée. P. 214–240. Jussieu A.L. 1789. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales dis-

posita… Parisiis: Herissant et Theophilum Barrois. 498 p.