- •American structuralism
- •The English Phonetic School
- •The problem of neutralization. The Moscow Phonological School.
- •The problem of neutralization. The leningrad Phonological School.
- •The copenhagen linguistic school. Copenhagen structuralism
- •Syllabic structure of english words
- •Theories of syllable formation
- •The parts of speech
- •The noun
- •The category of number
- •The category of case
- •The category of gender
- •The verb
- •Classifications of English verbs
- •The category of person and number
- •The category of tense
- •The category of voice
- •The category of aspect
- •The category of time correlation
- •The word group (phrase, word combination)
- •1. According to the morphological status of its components:
- •3. Phrases can be:
- •The sentence
- •Different approaches to the study of the sentence
The noun
The noun is the central lexical unit of the language. It’s the main nominative unit of speech.
Semantic features of a noun
The noun possesses the grammatical meaning of thingness, substantivity. According to different principles of classification nouns fall into several subclasses:
according to the type of nomination: proper and common
according to the form of existence: animate and inanimate
Animate nouns fall into: human and non-human
according to their quantitative structure: countable and uncountable
Morphological features of a noun
In accordance with a morphological structure of the stems all nouns can be classified into:
simple (neither suffix nor prefix)
derived (either suffix or prefix or both)
compound (2 or more stems)
composite (2 or more stems with suffixes or prefixes)
Syntactic features of nouns
The noun can be used in all syntactic functions but predicate.
It can go into right-hand and left-hand connections with practically all parts of speech.
The category of number
It is the linguistic representation of the objective category of quantity.
Number category is realized through the opposition of 2 form-classes:
the plural form
the singular form
The singular form may denote:
oneness (individual separate object, ex.: a cat)
generalization (the meaning of the whole class, ex.: the cat is a domestic animal)
indiscreetness or uncountableness, ex.: money, milk
The plural form may denote:
the existence of several objects, ex.: cats
the inner discreetness, ex.: jeans
The category of case
It expresses the relation of a word to another word in the word group or sentence.
It is realized through the opposition: the common case – the possessive case.
There is no universal point to the view as to the case system in English.
Ilyish: Case is a category of a noun expressing relations between the things denoted by a noun and other things or properties and which is manifested in the noun itself.
Boy – the zero-morpheme is a formal sign for the formal case.
Bloch: case is the immanent morphological category of the noun manifested in the forms of noun declension and showing the relations of the nounal referent to other objects and phenomena. It may be called the limited case theory.
Different scholars stick to a different number of cases.
Charles Fillmore distinguished 6 cases (syntactic, semantic approach):
agentive case, ex.: John opened the door (John – the doer)
instrumental case, ex.: The key opened the door
dative case, ex.: John believed that he would win (the case of the animate being affected by the state or action identified by the verb)
factitive case, ex.: The key was damaged (the result of the action or state identified by the verb)
locative case, ex.: Chicago is windy
objective case, ex.: John stole the book
John Lyons distinguished 7 cases (semantic approach):
nominative case, ex.: Tom died.
acusative case, ex.: John killed Tom.
dative case, ex.: John gave the money to Tom. John gave Tom the money.
genetive case, ex.: It was John’s money
instrumental case, ex.: John killed Tom with a knife
agentive case, ex.: Tom was killed by Bill. By Bill – agent of the action
comitative case (in the company with), ex.: Bill went to Tom with Mary
There are no cases at all.
The category of case has been destroyed by the theory of possessive postposition by professor Voronzova. She considers that it has the same grammatical function as a preposition. She denies the cases because these prepositional elements may be applied not to nouns but also to other words.
