- •Chapter 1
- •Introduction to linear singular optics
- •I.I. Mokhun
- •Chapter 1
- •Introduction to linear singular optics
- •I.I. Mokhun
- •1.1. IntRoduction
- •1.2. Basic notions of scalar singular optics
- •1.2.1. Phase vortices
- •1.2.2. Topological charge and topological index of singular points. Elementary topological reactions
- •1.2.2.1. Topological charge
- •1.2.2.2. Topological index
- •1.2.2.3. Conservation law for topological charge
- •1.2.2.4. Elementary topological reactions
- •1.2.3. Experimental observation and identification of vortices into scalar fields
- •1.2.4. Generation of vortices using computer-generated holograms
- •1.3. Vortices and phase structure of a scalar field
- •1.3.1. Sign principle
- •1.3.2. Phase speckles. “breathing” of phase speckles
- •1.3.3. Birth of vortices
- •1.3.4. Appearance of wave front dislocations as a result of interference of waves with simple phase surfaces
- •1.3.5. Topological indices of the field of intensity. Extrema of phase and intensity. “correlation” of phase and intensity
- •1.3.6. Vortex nets. Phase skeleton of a scalar field
- •1.3.6.1. Reconstruction of the field’s phase on the basis of shifted vortex nets
- •1.3.6.2. Image reconstruction using a regular sampling found from analysis of the parameters of vortices in random field
- •1.3.6.3. Some remarks on the field reconstruction by the use of nets of the intensity sTationary points
- •1.4. Singularities of a vector field
- •1.4.1. Disclinations. Polarization singularities
- •1.4.2. Vortices of phase difference. Sign principle for a vector field
- •1.4.2.1. Field decomposition into orthogonally linearly polarized components
- •1.4.2.2. Principle of the vortex analysis of vector fields
- •1.4.2.3. Vortices of orthogonally polarized field components. Technique for study of polarizatioN singularities
- •1.4.3. “Correlation” of intensity and polariszation of the vector field
- •1.4.4. Interconnection of the component vortices and -points
- •1.4.5. Elementary polarization structures and elementary polarization singularities of vector fields
- •1.4.5.1. Polarization structures resulting from interference of orthogonally linearly polarized beams
- •1.4.5.2. Elementary polarization singularities resulting from interference of circularly polarized beams
- •1.4.5.3. Experimental mOdeling of elementary polarization singularities
- •1.4.6. Fine structure and averaged polarization characteristics of inhomogeneous vector fields
- •1.4.6.1. Avaraged stokes parameters
- •1.4.6.2. Analysis of the averaged parameters for decomposition of the field into linearly polarized components
- •1.4.6.3. Computer simulation of the vector field’s parameters
- •1.4.6.4. Analysis of the averaged parameters for the field decomposition into circular basis
- •1.4.6.5. Comparison of the experimental results and the data of computer simulation
- •1.4.7. “Stokes-formalism” for polarization singularites. “stokes-vortices”
- •1.5. Singularities of the Poynting vector and the structure of optical fields
- •1.5.1. General assumptions. Components of the poynting vector
- •1.5.2. Singularities of the poynting vector in scalar fields
- •1.5.2.1. Instantaneous singularities of a scalar field
- •1.5.2.2. Averaged singularities of the poynting vector of scalar field
- •1.5.3. Singularities of the Poynting vector at vector fields
- •1.5.3.1. Instantaneous singularities of vector field
- •1.5.3.2. Behavior of the Poynting vector in areas of elementary polarization singularities
- •1.5.3.2.1. Symmetric distributions of amplitude and phase of the interfering beams
- •1.5.3.2.2. Non-symmetrical distributions of amplitudes and phases of the interfering beams
- •1.5.3.2.3. Experimental proving of the existence of the orbital momentum in the vicinity of -point
- •1.5.3.3. The averaged Poynting vector of the vector field
- •Instantaneous singularities of the Poynting vector
- •Appendix 1.1. Wave fronts approximation
- •104. I.Mokhun, r.Brandel and Ju.Viktorovskaya, “Angular momentum of electromagnetic field in areas of polarization singularities”, ujpo, Vol. 7, pp. 63-73, (2006).
Chapter 1
Introduction to linear singular optics
I.I. Mokhun
Chernivtsy University, Ukraine
1.1. IntRoduction
Propagation of a coherent radiation through inhomogeneous media with random fluctuations of local optical characteristics results in forming the optical wave that is characterized by random temporal and spatial distributions of its parameters, such as intensity, phase and, in general case, state of polarization. The fields formed in such a way are referred to as speckle fields [1,2].
While the parameters of speckle-fields are described by the complex functions of general form, one can expect that diverse peculiarities (or singularities) are inherent in them, both point-like and extended ones. Such singularities and stationary points are interconnected in the form of peculiar nets [3-26]. These nets, as skeletons, constitute the field structure, and information on the characteristics of these sets provides the feasibilities for predicting (at least qualitatively) the behavior of the field at any its point.
It must be emphasized that the fundamentals of this approach have been developed in the epoch-making book “Natural focusing and fine structure of light” by J. Nye issued in 1999 [3]. The problems elaborated in details in Ref. 3 are only mentioned in passing in this chapter, which is intended as some (successful, as the authors hopes) addendum and sequel of this outstanding study.
On this reason, the main attention is paid here to the decisive role of singularities of various kinds in formation of the structure of electromagnetic field. The author hopes that his sight of the problems of singular optics, as well as of the advances of the singular optical approach in solving the problems of optics and of the role of the nets of singularities as the skeletons of electromagnetic field, will be of interest for many readers involved in modern optics.
For the sake of observability, the author restricts the consideration by rigorously monochromatic waves. The optical singularities arising in optical waveguides, nonlinear media etc. are not considered also, while this is the subject for another comprehensive book.
Note in conclusion that the number of publications devoted to singular optics grows as avalanche in last years, and on this reason the list of references may seem as too short, especially in regard to the concluding subsection dealing with the singularities of the Poynting vector. Nevertheless, the list of references contains the key publication concerning the main aspects of singularities in electromagnetic fields.
1.2. Basic notions of scalar singular optics
1.2.1. Phase vortices
It is known
[12,28] that uniformly polarized wave of general form with frequency
,
,
being propagating in a free space, obeys the wave equation:
,
(1.1)
where
,
and
– wave length of radiation. Among various solutions of this
equation exists the solutions, for which the following relation is
satisfied:
, (1.2)
where
is a complex amplitude of the field, and
is the unitary vector determining its state of polarization. For
that,
satisfies the Laplace equation:
.
(1.3)
The solutions of Eq. (1.3) include all analytical functions with complex variables, the simplest of which is of the form:
. (1.4)
For that,
satisfies the wave equation (1.1). Eq. (1.4) can be easily
transformed to the form that is generally accepted as the definition
of complex amplitude:
,
(1.5)
where
is the amplitude, and
is the spatial phase. It follows from Eq. (1.5) that
and
can be regarded as the polar coordinates with the origin at
.
It is seen that the amplitude of this wave approaches zero, while the
phase is undetermined as
.
In other words, one observes a phase singularity at the point
.
Such wave formations were called as the wave front dislocation or
optical vortex [3-17,27,29-39]. Taking into account that below we
will consider vortices of various nature, let us refer to these
vortices as the phase vortices.
a b с
Figure 1.1. Phase map of an isotropic vortex. Levels of gray correspond to changes of a phase: (a) and (b) correspond to the signs + and – In Eq. (1.4), respectively; (c) shows changes of a phase under circumference of the vortex (solid and dashed lines for the positive and negative vortices, respectively).
a b с
Figure 1.2. Phase map of an anisotropic vortex.
Phase
distribution (a phase map) in the vortex vicinity defined by Eq.
(1.4) is represented in Figure 1.1. One can see that under
circumference of the vortex centre the phase changes linearly, being
growing or decreasing depending on the sign + or – in Eq. (1.4). In
paper [12,27] such vortices were called as isotropic
ones. In general case (as one can see from Figure 1.1) the equiphase
line associated with zero magnitude of a phase does not coincide with
-axis
of the laboratory coordinates with the origin at the vortex centre.
Magnitude of a phase shift,
,
hereinafter is referred to as the initial
phase
of an isotropic vortex. Note, that the phase change shown in Figure
1.1(c) can be obtained from the phase distribution illustrated in
Figure 1.1(a) by a simple rotation of the coordinates at the angle
.
a b
Figure1.3. Replacing of an anisotropic vortex by the isotropic one.
Of course,
Eq. (1.4) is seldom applicable for generic optical field. The area
where the phase changes obey linear approximation is referred to as
the vortex core [3,4]. As a rule, behavior of a phase within the
vortex core is governed by any nonlinear rule (see Figures 1.2 and
1.3) that corresponds to appearance the real coefficients at
and
in Eq. (1.4), see Figure 1.2. The most general description of the
vortex structure is achieved through additional rotation of the phase
structure of a vortex, as it is shown in Figure 1.3(a). One can see
from this figure that the line of zero phase does not coincide with
the
-axis,
and the angle
between equiphase lines
and
differs from 90о.
Such vortices are called as anisotropic
ones [12,27].
There are general features of the phase changes under circumference of the vortex:
Phase surface in the vortex vicinity is the clockwise or the counterclockwise helicoid. This is the only case when the phase change by
under circumference of the vortex takes place.Phase change in the function of a polar angle is monotonic (Figure 1.3(b)). That is why, any isotropic vortex can be put in correspondence to the given anisotropic one [25,26]. Let us call this isotropic vortex as the characterizing vortex. Phase change of the characterizing vortex is depicted in figure by the dished line. Note that the maximal phase difference of the genuine vortex,
,
and of the characterizing vortex does not exceed
.
Thus, following the Rayleigh criterium, we can conclude that any
anisotropic vortex can be replaced, within accuracy
,
by an isotropic vortex with specified magnitude of the initial phase
.By passing the vortex centre, the phase undergoes a jump by
.
As a consequence, change of the phase at adjacent areas of the
magnitude
is the same,
.
