
- •Chapter 1
- •Introduction to linear singular optics
- •I.I. Mokhun
- •Chapter 1
- •Introduction to linear singular optics
- •I.I. Mokhun
- •1.1. IntRoduction
- •1.2. Basic notions of scalar singular optics
- •1.2.1. Phase vortices
- •1.2.2. Topological charge and topological index of singular points. Elementary topological reactions
- •1.2.2.1. Topological charge
- •1.2.2.2. Topological index
- •1.2.2.3. Conservation law for topological charge
- •1.2.2.4. Elementary topological reactions
- •1.2.3. Experimental observation and identification of vortices into scalar fields
- •1.2.4. Generation of vortices using computer-generated holograms
- •1.3. Vortices and phase structure of a scalar field
- •1.3.1. Sign principle
- •1.3.2. Phase speckles. “breathing” of phase speckles
- •1.3.3. Birth of vortices
- •1.3.4. Appearance of wave front dislocations as a result of interference of waves with simple phase surfaces
- •1.3.5. Topological indices of the field of intensity. Extrema of phase and intensity. “correlation” of phase and intensity
- •1.3.6. Vortex nets. Phase skeleton of a scalar field
- •1.3.6.1. Reconstruction of the field’s phase on the basis of shifted vortex nets
- •1.3.6.2. Image reconstruction using a regular sampling found from analysis of the parameters of vortices in random field
- •1.3.6.3. Some remarks on the field reconstruction by the use of nets of the intensity sTationary points
- •1.4. Singularities of a vector field
- •1.4.1. Disclinations. Polarization singularities
- •1.4.2. Vortices of phase difference. Sign principle for a vector field
- •1.4.2.1. Field decomposition into orthogonally linearly polarized components
- •1.4.2.2. Principle of the vortex analysis of vector fields
- •1.4.2.3. Vortices of orthogonally polarized field components. Technique for study of polarizatioN singularities
- •1.4.3. “Correlation” of intensity and polariszation of the vector field
- •1.4.4. Interconnection of the component vortices and -points
- •1.4.5. Elementary polarization structures and elementary polarization singularities of vector fields
- •1.4.5.1. Polarization structures resulting from interference of orthogonally linearly polarized beams
- •1.4.5.2. Elementary polarization singularities resulting from interference of circularly polarized beams
- •1.4.5.3. Experimental mOdeling of elementary polarization singularities
- •1.4.6. Fine structure and averaged polarization characteristics of inhomogeneous vector fields
- •1.4.6.1. Avaraged stokes parameters
- •1.4.6.2. Analysis of the averaged parameters for decomposition of the field into linearly polarized components
- •1.4.6.3. Computer simulation of the vector field’s parameters
- •1.4.6.4. Analysis of the averaged parameters for the field decomposition into circular basis
- •1.4.6.5. Comparison of the experimental results and the data of computer simulation
- •1.4.7. “Stokes-formalism” for polarization singularites. “stokes-vortices”
- •1.5. Singularities of the Poynting vector and the structure of optical fields
- •1.5.1. General assumptions. Components of the poynting vector
- •1.5.2. Singularities of the poynting vector in scalar fields
- •1.5.2.1. Instantaneous singularities of a scalar field
- •1.5.2.2. Averaged singularities of the poynting vector of scalar field
- •1.5.3. Singularities of the Poynting vector at vector fields
- •1.5.3.1. Instantaneous singularities of vector field
- •1.5.3.2. Behavior of the Poynting vector in areas of elementary polarization singularities
- •1.5.3.2.1. Symmetric distributions of amplitude and phase of the interfering beams
- •1.5.3.2.2. Non-symmetrical distributions of amplitudes and phases of the interfering beams
- •1.5.3.2.3. Experimental proving of the existence of the orbital momentum in the vicinity of -point
- •1.5.3.3. The averaged Poynting vector of the vector field
- •Instantaneous singularities of the Poynting vector
- •Appendix 1.1. Wave fronts approximation
- •104. I.Mokhun, r.Brandel and Ju.Viktorovskaya, “Angular momentum of electromagnetic field in areas of polarization singularities”, ujpo, Vol. 7, pp. 63-73, (2006).
1.3.6.2. Image reconstruction using a regular sampling found from analysis of the parameters of vortices in random field
It has been shown [12] that the field at the Fourier domain (at far field) can be represented by so-called product of the wave functions:
,
(1.43)
where
is the phase change in the vicinity of the
-th
vortex.
Replacing the system of anisotropic vortices by the system of isotropic ones, one can rewrite Eq. (1.43) in the form:
,
(1.44)
where
is the true amplitude,
,
,
the origin of the coordinates
coincides with the center of the
th
vortex, and
is the topological charge of the
th
isotropic vortex.
It follows from Eq. (1.44) and from accounting that the resulting phase of a field is the sum of elementary phases associated with the each vortex, that the sum of the initial phases of isotropic vortices,
,
(1.45)
forms only the constant phase shift [12], which is the same for the whole field. In this sense, the initial phase of an isotropic vortex is not relevant and can be neglected in consideration of the field formation. Evidently, this conclusion leads to the new insight in replacing of the anisotropic vortices by isotropic ones. The field in the vicinity of any individual speckle is formed by “equal” vortices, which differ from each other by the sign of the topological charge alone. In its turn, it means that the field reconstruction using the shifted sampling must also be different. Indeed, one can conclude that even for considerable magnitude of the sampling shift, when any reading passes from one speckle to another, this point is under “influence” of the equivalent vortex.
This
conclusion is confirmed by the results of computer simulation
represented in Figure 1.20. This figure illustrates the field
reconstruction using the shifted samplings, when anisotropic vortices
at far zone are replaced by isotropic ones. Similarly to the previous
case, the shift of sampling coordinates is performed in directions of
both the
-
axis and the
-axis.
One can see that in contrast to the results shown in Figure 1.20, the
dark area at the center of the image remains even for the shift
2
,
cf. Figure 1.20(f).
Figure
1.20.
Reconstruction of the field using the shifted sampling, when
anisotropic vortices are replaced by isotropic ones. (a)
– original image; (b)
–
Illustrating
the principle of formation of the shifted sampling;
– grey points correspond to the positions of amplitude zeroes,
black points indicate the positions of the readings of a sampling,
– shift of the readings in respect to the vortex coordinates;
(c)-(f)
correspond to various magnitudes of
:
(c)
– 0.1
;
(d)
– 0.5
;
(e)
–
;
(f)
– 2
.
In conclusion of this section, we represent the results of reconstruction of the initial field using the Shannon sampling formed using the characteristics of the system of isotropic vortices. There are the principles of the sampling formation:
spacing of the readings is of the order of magnitude 0.5 ;
amplitude of the field at the reading point is the same as its true magnitude found as the square root from intensity;
phase of the field at point
of any reading is determined as
,
(1.46)
where
are the coordinates of the nearest to the point
isotropic vortex,
and
are the topological charge and the initial phase of this vortex,
respectively.
In fact, a phase at the arbitrary point of the field is determined as the phase of the nearest isotropic vortex, while the influence of a vortex on the field structure is extended over the distance comparable with a half of the correlation length of a field, as it has been shown above. This circumstance is taken into account, while the spacing of readings equals 0.5 .
N
Figure
1.21.
Field
reconstruction using the Shannon sampling formed using the
characteristics of the system of isotropic vortices. (a)
– original image; (b)
– the results of reconstruction;
(c)
– illustrating
the principle of sampling formation.
– grey points correspond to the positions of isotropic vortices,
and black points correspond to the positions of readings. Arrows
indicate the coordinates of readings, whose phase is “determined”
by the corresponding vortex.
.
In our
consideration, an average deviation of the computed phase from the
true one did not exceed
=
,
and in some points the computed phase was equal to the true one
exactly. An average deviation,
,
in the points where the difference between two mentioned phases
exceeded
,
was not larger than
(20 – 25% of the total number of points).
The results
of the field reconstruction using such Shannon sampling are
represented in Figure 1.21(b). It is seen from figure that the field
reconstructed using the regular sampling (with
computed following
Eq. (1.46)) approaches the initial image of
the test-object. Relatively dark area at the center of the image is
explained as the result of combined influence of the system of
isotropic vortices.
Thus, the obtained results lead to the following conclusions.
1. “Phase influence” of some vortex is extended on the distance comparable with the correlation length of the field.
2. The reconstructed field is modulated by the “vortex” amplitude function, if the reconstructing sampling of the point sources coincides in coordinates with the shifted net of amplitude zeroes.
3. The net of anisotropic vortices of a random field can be replaced by the system of isotropic vortices. For that, the influence of such system of isotropic vortices and of individual vortices per se on the field structure is extended much more far than the influence of the associated system of anisotropic vortices, viz. at distances much exceeding the correlation length of the field.
4. A phase at the arbitrary point of the field can be determined reliably (with error non exceeding ) by analyzing the characteristics of the system of isotropic vortices.