
- •1. Definition of culture and main approaches in its comprehension
- •2. Correlation between the world culture, ethnoculture, and national culture
- •3. Early forms of religious experience: animism, fetishism, totemism.
- •4. Cucuteni-Trypillian culture: main characteristics
- •7. Functions of culture
- •8. Scythian culture
- •9. Sarmathian culture
- •11 The idea of national culture
- •12 Sources of Ukrainian culture
- •13. Parts of Ukrainian culture
- •14. The differences between Ukrainian ethnoculture and professional culture
- •15. Sources of information about culture of Pre-Slavic and Slavic population in Ukrainian lands
- •16. Peculiarities of Slavic mythology
- •18. Cosmology in Slavic mythology
- •20. General characteristics of Kyivan Rus’ culture
- •21. Origins of Kyivan Rus’
- •22. Christian influence on cultural development of Kyivan Rus’
- •23. Literature of Kyivan Rus’
- •24. Slovo o polku Ihorevi (The Tale of Ihor’s Compaign)
- •27. Iconography in Kyivan Rus’
- •28. Prominent activists of Kyivan Rus’ culture (Ilarion, Nestor the Chronicler, St.Antony of the Caves)
- •29. Renaissance humanism in Europe
- •30. Cultural impulses of Reformation and Contrreformation in Europe
- •31. Religious life after the Church Union of Berestia
- •32. Cultural dimensions of Early Modern civil society
- •33. Brotherhoods as a cultural phenomenon
- •34. Education and Brotherhoods’ activity: general characteristics
- •35. Cultural role of Ostrih Academy
- •36. Kyivan Mohyla Academy
- •37. Ivan Fedorov and book printing activity of Brotherhoods.
- •38. Architecture of Cossack Baroque
- •39. Baroque style in Europe
- •41. Polemic literature and I.Vyshensky
- •42. H.Hrabianka and his Chronicle
- •Th.Prokopovich and his role in Ukrainian culture
- •H.Scovoroda in Ukrainian culture
- •45. Cultural meaning of the Enlightenment
- •46. The process of Russification in Ukrainian lands of Russian Empire: main waves
- •47. An Old Ukrainian tradition: Bard (kobzars, bandurysts, and lirnyks)
- •48. Rococo architecture in Ukraine
- •49 The style of Classicism in Europe
- •51. Classicism literature of Ukraine
- •52. I.Kotliarevsky and the new Ukrainian literature
- •53. Cultural activity of Cyril and Methodius Brotherhood
- •54. Hromada movement and the growth of Ukrainian national consciousness Hromadas
- •55. Realism and Romanticism as the main styles in literature and arts of the 19th century: general characteristics
- •56. Poetry of Ukrainian Romanticism
- •57. Romanticism in Ukrainian music (s.Hulak-Artemovsky, m.Lysenko)
- •58. Peredvizhniki and their role in Ukrainian culture
- •59. Ukrainian civil press of the 2nd half of the 19th century
- •61. Main representatives of Ukrainian theater
- •62.Prominent scholars of the 19th century (m.Maksymovych, m.Kostomarov, V.Antonovych, o.Potebnia)
- •63. Ukrainian writers of the 19th century (p.Kulish, Marko Vovchok, m.Kotsiubynsky, s.Rudansky)
- •64. Creative activity of n.Gogol
- •65. Creative activity of t. Shevchenko
- •67. Creative activity of I.Franko
- •68 Cultural activity of m.Drahomanov
- •70. Modernism in Ukrainian culture: general characteristics
- •71. Socialist realism in the ussr: general characteristics
- •72. Socialist realism in the ussr: main representatives
- •73. Les Kurbas and Berezil
- •74. O.Dovzhenko and Ukrainian cinematograph
- •75. Cubism in Ukrainian painting
- •76. Constructivism in Ukrainian arts
- •77. Ukrainian Impressionist Painters
- •78 Creative activity of o.Archipenko
- •79. Symbolism in Ukrainian literature
- •80. Expressionism in Ukrainian plastic arts
- •82. M.Khvylovy and Vaplite
- •83. M.Zerov and Ukrainian Neoclassicists
- •84. Ukrainian poetry of the 20th century (m.Bazhan, p.Tychina, m.Rylsky)
- •85. Cultural meaning of Shistdesiatnyky
- •86 Shistdesiatnyky: main representatives in Ukrainian literature
Th.Prokopovich and his role in Ukrainian culture
. Prokopovych, Teofan (secular name: Eleazar), b 18 June 1681 in Kyiv, d 19 September 1736 in Saint Petersburg. (Portrait: Teofan Prokopovych.) Orthodox archbishop, writer, scholar, and philosopher. He graduated from the Kyivan Mohyla Academy in 1696 and continued his education in Lithuania, Poland, and at the Saint Athanasius Greek College in Rome. In 1704 he returned to the Mohyla Academy to teach poetics, rhetoric, philosophy, and theology. He also served as prefect from 1708 and rector in 1711–16. He gained prominence as a writer and as a supporter of Hetman Ivan Mazepa. His most famous work, Vladimir, is dedicated to the hetman, whom he depicted as the figure of the Grand Prince of Kyiv. Prokopovych also praised Mazepa in his sermons and propounded Kyiv as the second Jerusalem. Following Mazepa's unsuccessful revolt against Tsar Peter I in 1709, however, Prokopovych denounced him and expressed his complete allegiance to Peter. He participated in the campaign to vilify Mazepa, calling him ‘the one filled with the Devil's spirit’ and ‘the new Judas.’ From then he became a favorite of Peter's and was rewarded with several promotions. He was called to Saint Petersburg to be a preacher and adviser to the tsar, was consecrated bishop (1718) and then archbishop (1720) of Pskov, was appointed vice-president of the new Holy Synod in 1721, and finally was made archbishop of Novgorod in 1725.
In the 1720s Prokopovych played a crucial role in the reform of the Russian Orthodox church. He supported the liquidation of the position of patriarch and the creation of the Holy Synod under the direct authority of the tsar. In 1721 he wrote the Dukhovnyi reglament, a reform statute under which the church was transformed into a state bureaucracy. He was also one of the major theorists of Russian autocracy. These positions brought him into conflict with the traditional church establishment and the boyars, who succeeded in isolating him from Russian political and cultural life after Peter's death.
Prokopovych's most notable contribution to Ukrainian literature was the drama Vladimir (1705). Although filled with Old Church Slavonic expressions, it is innovative in its use of dialogue and varied patterns of verse. His other poetic works include a panegyric on the Battle of Poltava in Ukrainian, German, and Latin; various elegies; and other works. He wrote an authoritative textbook on poetics, De arte poetica..., which was influenced more by classical poetics than by prevailing baroque theory. In this he introduced the use of the hexameter and developed the epigram and other poetic forms. After his departure to Saint Petersburg, Prokopovych lost contact with Ukrainian literary development. His subsequent works were all in Russian and often devoted to praising Peter I and his imperial reforms.
He wrote many theological works in Latin and Old Church Slavonic. His course notes on theology from the Kyivan Mohyla Academy were published as Christianae orthodoxae theologiae in Academia Kijoviensi (5 vols, 1773–5) and Compendium sacrae orthodoxae theologiae (1802). His theology showed the influence of Protestant theologians and his conscious departure from the Catholic influences that earlier predominated at the academy. His Philosophia peripatetica is a philosophical text that embraces logic, natural philosophy, mathematics, and ethics. In it he set out the ideas of Descartes, Locke, Bacon, Hobbes, and Spinoza and supported the theories of Galileo, Kepler, and Copernicus. He also introduced the teaching of mathematics and geometry into the curriculum of the Kyivan Academy. His text on rhetoric, De arte rhetorica libri X (which appeared in Ukrainian translation as Pro rytorychne mystetstvo, 1979), criticized the baroque style in speeches, sermons, and panegyrics and argued for the dominance of content over form.
Most of Prokopovych's historical writings deal with the reign of Peter I. The most important of these is Istoriia imperatora Petra Velikogo ot rozhdeniia ego do Poltavskoi batalii (The History of Emperor Peter the Great from His Birth to the Battle of Poltava, 1788).
The most complete collections of his works appeared in 1961 (ed I. Eremin) and in 3 vols in 1979–81 (published in Ukrainian translation by the AN URSR [now NANU]). A bibliography of his works, compiled by J. Cracraft, appeared in Oxford Slavonic Papers (1975).