
- •Communicative Language Teaching
- •C ommunicative situations
- •Input reading 1
- •Humanistic approach Warming-up discussion 1.1
- •Intensification tendency
- •What features of communicative teaching can you detect in the following activities?
- •Match the following tasks the methods
- •Exploratory task 1.5
- •Exploratory task 1.6
- •Input reading 2
- •C ommunicative competence
- •Exploratory task 2.1 What functions and roles to the people perform in the following oral and written quotations? Some have been done for you
- •Exploratory task 2.2
- •Exploratory task 2.3
- •Describe non-verbal communication in your native culture
- •How would you say the following sentences without words, using the gestures only?
- •Exploratory task 2.6
- •Exploratory task 2.8 What language knowledge (associated vocabulary) and world knowledge (knowledge on the topic) do we need to know in order to understand this text?
- •Input reading 3
- •Exploratory task 3.1
- •Match the following techniques and their features
- •Exploratory task 3.2
- •Exploratory task 3.3
- •Integrated task
- •Illustrate the tasks for teaching pronunciation, grammar and lexis (indicate the source)
- •Answer keys
- •Exploratory task 1.1
- •Glossary
- •References and further reading
- •Brown, g. And g. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cup Bygate, m. 1987. Speaking. Oup
- •Ellis, r. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Cup
Exploratory task 1.5
Give your definitions of the concepts in the spaces provided
Communicative approach is used differently in different teaching cultures. “Teaching culture” is the collective teaching experience, beliefs and practices, which are typical of a certain community or society. Communicative approach is not universally relevant for different teaching cultures. The learners can question the effectiveness of the lesson during which they practice communication but do not learn anything concrete. “What have we learned during this lesson of incessant talk?”, is a typical question asked by the learners in Asian communities. In Japan languages are taught in the typically teacher-fronted and teacher-centered classrooms. A typical lesson consists of the teacher's checking the learner's sentence by sentence translations of a text. Chinese students can be unwilling to ask questions during a communicative lesson because students they do not want to interrupt other students or the teacher, it is better to ask after the lesson etc. (Coleman H. 1996.Society and the Language Classroom. CUP). A lesson of English in Russia includes homework check up, presentation of the new material and reinforcement of the new material. The teacher, who signals when a particular learner is invited to speak, will regulate learners' participation in the lesson (Millrood, R. 1999. How Native English Speakers Can be Better English Teachers in Russia. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol..5 No 1 1999. Ellis, G. 1996. How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELTJ. Volume 50/3. P. 213-218)
Exploratory task 1.6
Given below are the features of the BANA (British, Australian and North-American) teaching culture. Supply the corresponding features of the “Non-BANA” teaching culture
BANA teaching culture |
Non-BANA teaching culture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Input reading 2
Warming up discussion 2.1
Brain-storm the concept of “communicative competence” i.e. the knowledge and skills a learner needs for successful communication and draw a “tree diagram” of this concept
C ommunicative competence
Communicative competence and ability
Communication is the process of interpersonal interaction and requires the knowledge of social conventions. In accordance with the social conventions, participants in communication perform communicative functions (to socialize, to inform, to persuade, to elicit information, to manipulate behavior and opinions, to perform rituals etc), communicative roles (leader, informer, witness, participant, catalyst, entertainer etc), social roles (family status, profession, social class etc) and masquerade roles (pretending to be somebody they are not) (Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. OUP. P. 160)